DOCSLIB.ORG

Law Enforcement and Traffic Safety

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

13 Law Enforcemenl and '.. •••:••'..••• , -^ •;;.-,:V • ' ••:••••.•• •..:•.••••-/••• •'•• ^^"- • THE STATEWIDE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES* X RIME repression and traffic law en­ In the field of crime repression and G forcement continue'to stand out as prevention ,.the load thrust upon the the two major responsibilities of state state ^enforcement agencies has been es-; law enforcement agencies, but the impact pecraily burdensome. Counted among of the War is evidenced in every phase the/newer and pressing responsibilities of their activities. In the field of motor during 1912 were the protection of in­ vehicle traffic, the war effort has required dustrial areas, combatting of subversive especial attention to such important activities, training of auxiliary personnel, problems as the movement of fnen and . and the maintenance of an ever watchful niatenals to and from war plants and eye over the rising tide of crime and supply depots, the escort of military cara­ juvenile delinquency.^ These and many vans, the planning of convoy routes, -the of motor vehicle equipment, the replacement study' of evacuation areas in the event' and repair of which becomes a critical problem of disaster, and the enforcement of the because of priorities and scarcity of materials. gasoline and tire rationing programs.' The above data was supplied through the cour­ Above all Iqomcd the critical problem tesy of the National Safety Council. 3 Xake the situation in West Virginia as an ex­ of combatting injuries, accidents and ample. During the biennium, July I. igjb-June deaths on the highways—a problem which 30, 1912, the state police travelled^ ' t.9% miles 'struck at the heart of the war effort.^ and enSployed 919 man hours in assisting selec­ tive service i)oards; 4,984 miles and .joG man 1 Attention directed to convoying of military hours in assisting sugar, and gasolincl rationing caravans is. illusbative of the war load. The . boards; 27,780 miles and 4,630 man hours in ifi- Connecticut State Police averaged G15 convoys ternal security investigation: 12,61/', miles and per month in 1942, the Pennsylvania Motor Po­ 1,927 man hours in civilian defense activities. In lice 300," the, Klaisachusetts State Police 170. Maine, the State Bureau of Identification as­ Members of the California Highway Patrol tra­ sumed the' principal responsibility for finger­ velled about 57^^000 miles per month in convoy printing all members of the civilian defense, duty, those of the Florida .Highway Patrol :ap- corps. .Some 22,000 fingerprints were taken. In piroximately 40,000' miles. From the meinoran- Ohio, the State Highway Patrol launched^acom- dura of Edward J. Hickey, Chairman, State and . prehensive trajning program which included Provincial Section, International Association of training of plant guards, in 1G2 war industries, • Chiefs, of Police, to state police executives, dated trainiifg of civilian and police personnel in emer­ January rg. 1943. • V gency police duties~in 74 cities and. towns, and :'2This is evidenced by the crippling toll of giving motor corps unit and. safety driving in­ deaths, injuries,.and accidents during 1942. Esti­ struction in 34 cities. More, than 2,000. investiga­ mates now available count deaths over the na­ tions per month were made for the FBI by the tion at 27,800, non-fatal injuries at 1,000,000 • state police in California, Illinois. Maine, Massa­ .(about 8oi,ooo persons were left permanently in­ chusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Alexico, Penn- jured), and accidents involving only property sylvania; Rhode Island, Texas, and Washington. damage at 4,170,000. The hyin evils of this situa­ \ • Prepared tjy David Geeting Monroe, Interna­ tion in relation to the war effort are obvioiis: tional As.sbciation of Chi^ of Police, Safety Divi­ loss of man-hour time in war production and loss sion,. Evanston, Illinois.' 273 ^•\ 274 THE BOOK OF THE iSTA TES • tf other activities have created an enormous respect to the serving of civil processes.^ drain on men and materials, and account As many officials had anticipated, the for many of the shifts and changes in inanpowc^" problem became a distressing police organization and proccdihes which isr>ue of first magnitude during the year, occurred during the year. Members of. the state police and highway The situation wit^ reference to the patrols are exceptionally vulnerable to authority, exercised by the various state military service because of their low avr enfprc-enient' agencies remained more or erage age and their aboyc-averagc physi- less static during 1942. A majority of cal coiiclition. As of October 1, 1942, for the departments (31) of the 48). cohtin- example, 16 per cent of the personnel in ued to operaie under broad authorities, the 17 departments for which informa- permitting enforcement of both criminal Vtion is avaflable was alieady in the armed and motor vehicle laws. Thirteen de- keJivices and 58 per cent^^if the remaining partments continued to be con.stricted to personnel was under ^35 5|?ars of age and enforcement of niotor vehicle laws only.* thus immediately sid)ject fe) military call.'' But, as a rule, most 6t the departments Added to the pr.oblemof losses to the which were authorized to enforce the armed services was ,the difficulty of ob­ criminal laws did not regularly and com­ taining replacements, The experience of pletely exercise sudi powers except as die Texas pepariment of Public Safety they relatecl'to special war problems is typical.. Ordinaiily, 700 ()r more candi- Police activities centered principally in dates can be counted upon to apply for the field of traffic law enlorccment. As in entrance examinations for the police serv­ previous years, the carrying on of a va­ ice. Only 130 applicants were available riety of regulatory atl ivities remainefl the for the 1942 summer examination; and responsibility of many other slate agen­ their physical and mental caliber was cies ojserating independently of the state definitely below previous levels, In:view: police departnients or liighway patrols.^ of the strate;gic position which state po­ . Jurisdictionally, siatejividc enforcement lice agencies occiipy in the enforcement continued about the same. The invesli- field and their exceptional usefulness in gation'and enforcement of criminal laws times of war and crisis, the situation is within municipalhies was enjoinedordi- ' one which is'fraught with the greatest narily, save when a state officer wit- . danger," nessed a crime perpetrated within the Diiferences in the areas of the various municipal limits, or was in pursuit of a states, their, population, road mileage, fif. violator or suspected, violator, or was nancial resources, and ideologies regard- . calledn])on for 'assistance by municipal jng enforcement continue to emphasize, authorities or the govcnior. Similarly, major variations in the . numerical-," legislative provisions which prohibited utilization of state ciiforcement agencies fi yV'ith respect to authority aiid jurisdiction of in industrial disputes were continued. the state agencies consult State-and Pwvijicial Police, hy David Geeting Monroe (Evanston, Illi­ This Was likewise i!rue, as a rule, with nois, i<):ii),Ch. 11. ' .t •f From the Report of Commissioner Edward J. ••Sec tabic-on page 277^ - • Hickey, Chairman. o£/,the State and Provincial 5\i\inong these regulatory activities are: fish Section of the Internaiipnal./Vssociation of Chiefs and game control, forestry and plant quarUiitine, of Police,'to Nfajor'GeiierarXllen W. Gullfdn, ~ housing inspection, narcotics control, factory \in(i Provost Nfai-shal General, United States Army, workshop inspection, and food inspection. I'ITC dated October 31, 1942, pp. 12-14. number of agencies involved iii these activities in 8 Knfoixcinent bj' the state police ^d highway each state varies from one to twenty-five or niore. |)atrols is; unique in many respects. TheV alone Some agencies arc mere fact findin3|Snnes whose operate throughout, the territorial jurisdiction of principal task is that of gathering and analy/in.g their respective states; their organization and dis­ statistical inforination. Others, and these arc \\\ cipline are quasi-military and membci-s arc'sub- the majority, ;\*;e actively engaged in forms of ject to call.throughout the 24-.hour period; fheir activity which rc(f<iire the services of inspectors, membei-s possess strategic knowledge of the geog- • special investigators.-and the like. Indications raphy of .their jurisdictions; they have ihe^ad-. are that employees of such agencies outiniinber vantage of elfective statewide comminiicatiori sys-- the state police and highway patrol personnel in tems and record devices which,are immeasurably a majority of states. hnportant aids to enforcement. ' . •V t LAW ENFORCEMENT AND TRAFFIC SAFET}\ 275 strength of the various statewicle depart­ of police^personnel, the upward swing' ments. In all, these departments em­ toward enlargement of state police forces z ployed.9,271 police personnel and 2,209 was appareiU in nearly all tlcpartments, -civilian personnel, or a total of '11,480." This made possible ainore intensive Distribution of departments according to territorial coverage—a coverage possible their numerical strength was as follows: in large measure only by increased, adop- •; tion of. motor v'ehicle and communica'/" DisrRinuTioN OF POI.ICK STRENGTH OF ST.vrE\viDF. tion facilities. As (if March, 1941, for . I DKPARTMENTS ; » • example, the number of patrol cars .Of • Police Ntimljcrof. Per Cent Personnel-. Departments , - ofTotal the statewide departmt'nts totalled ab(5ut Less than/;-,(). 8 !7 .4,700. Two years later (March, ,:i'943) 50 to 99.,.;..,....; 11 . .23 the nuniber exceeded 6,400, or a gain of . 100.to 199........... iG 33 200 to 299........... 5 n roughly 1,700 patrolcar iihits.'VtJnques- 300 to 399........... 3. ^ () tionably, however, gains have levelled 400 to .199 2 j 4 .off in iecentmonths due to priority and /J - 500 to 999 2 1 - -1 other war difficidtie.s. In the use of mo­ 1,000 and over , 1 27 torcycles, decline is also, in evidence.
Recommended publications
  • August 2020 Meeting Minutes

    August 2020 Meeting Minutes

    STATE OF ALASKA Alaska Police Standards Council Minutes of the 138th Regular Meeting August 26, 2020 Statewide Teleconference 1. CALL TO ORDER Chair Doll called the 138th Regular Meeting of the Alaska Police Standards Council to order on August 26, 2020, at 12:00 p.m. A roll call was conducted as follows: APSC Members Present Chair Justin Doll, Chief, Anchorage PD Vice-Chair Kelly Goode, Deputy Commissioner, DOC Michael Craig, Public Member Steve Dutra, Chief, North Pole PD David Knapp, Sergeant, Correctional Officer IV DOC Ed Mercer, Chief, Juneau PD Leon Morgan, Deputy Commissioner, DPS Wendi Shackelford, Public Member Joe White, Chief, Ketchikan PD Jen Winkelman, Director of Probation/Parole, DOC APSC Members Absent Rebecca Hamon, Public Member Shane Nicholson, Sergeant, Kodiak AWT Dan Weatherly, Public Member APSC Administrative Staff Present Robert Griffiths, Executive Director Wendy Menze, Administrative Assistant Sarah Hieb, Administrative Investigator Rob Heide, Training Coordinator Department of Law Representatives Present Jack McKenna, Department of Law Stephanie Galbraith, Department of Law John Skidmore, Department of Law Kaci Schroeder, Department of Law Alaska Police Standards Council Meeting Minutes – 8-26-2020 1 2. AUDIENCE INTRODUCTIONS Greg Russell, Retired Chief Joshua Wilson, ACOA Randi Breager, DPS April Wilkerson, DOC Tabitha Timmerman, DOC Tim Putney, Chief, Kodiak Megan Stencel Kimberly Clark 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Executive Director Griffiths asked that the agenda be amended to include consideration of a regulation change dealing with U.S. nationals under Agenda Item 9, New Business. It was moved by Winkelman and seconded by Shackelford to approve the amended agenda. The motion passed with unanimous consent.
  • Connecticut State Police Topics in Public Safety the Number to Call in an Emergency

    Connecticut State Police Topics in Public Safety the Number to Call in an Emergency

    Connecticut State Police Do NOT call 911: TIPS Topics in Public Safety For directory assistance.. To ask for traffic status. To report a power outage. 911 For directions. To request non-emergency The number to call in an emergency transportation. To discuss traffic tickets is- Police, fire or medical emergencies require immediate help. sued by police. Never hesitate to call 911 to protect life and property. As a prank with friends. 911 operators are trained professionals who will ask perti- When in doubt, always call 911. Specially trained 911 operators nent questions to get you the help needed in the shortest time will determine whether or not the situation is an emergency and possible. In emergency situations, minutes—even seconds— requires assistance. Remember to speak clearly and calmly and can make a crucial difference – that’s why early intervention answer all questions posed by the operator. Tell the operator the is critical. Call 911 first, then family and friends if necessary. nature of the emergency and its location. Call 911: Teach children to call 911 only in an emergency. For all emergencies that require po- lice, fire or medical assistance to protect Many times, people dial 911 by mistake or a child calls 911 when lives or property. no emergency exists. If this occurs, do NOT hang up the phone. To report a crime in progress. 911 Hanging up the phone could lead a 911 operator to believe that a To report a fire. true emergency exists, and will send responders to your location. If someone suffering from life- Instead, simply explain to the 911 operator that a mistake was threatening injuries Medical emergencies made.
  • Service Patrol Handbook

    Service Patrol Handbook

    FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION SERVICE PATROL HANDBOOK November 2008 NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the department of transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade and manufacturers’ names appear in this report only because they are considered essential to the object of the document. i Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HOP-08-031 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Service Patrol Handbook November 2008 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Nancy Houston, Craig Baldwin, Andrea Vann Easton, Steve Cyra, P.E., P.T.O.E., Marc Hustad, P.E., Katie Belmore, EIT 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Booz Allen Hamilton HNTB Corporation 8283 Greensboro Drive 11414 West Park Place, Suite 300 McLean, Virginia 22102 Milwaukee, WI 53224 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Federal Highway Administration, HOTO-1 Final Report U. S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, D. C. 20590 HOTO, FHWA 15. Supplementary Notes Paul Sullivan, FHWA Office of Operations, Office of Transportation Operations, Contracting Officer’s Technical Representative (COTR). Handbook development was performed under contract to Booz Allen Hamilton. 16. Abstract This Handbook provides an overview of the Full-Function Service Patrol (FFSP) and describes desired program characteristics from the viewpoint of an agency that is responsible for funding, managing, and operating the services.
  • AGENCY for HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN INTRODUCTION the State of Florida Has Developed a Plan to Respon

    AGENCY for HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN INTRODUCTION the State of Florida Has Developed a Plan to Respon

    AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN INTRODUCTION The State of Florida has developed a plan to respond to natural and man-made disasters, that provides a method for the delivery of goods and services to affected areas quickly and decisively. The plan is initiated in Tallahassee at the State Emergency Operations Center (SEOC) where the seventeen emergency Support Functions (ESF’s) are activated. A brief description of each ESF is contained in this manual. OVERVIEW OF EMERGENCY SUPPORT FUNCTIONS (ESF) In a widespread emergency the needs may be complex and far-reaching. Seventeen areas of responsibility have been established to coordinate emergency preparedness, response, and recovery. Those areas are known as Emergency Support Functions (ESF). There is one agency with primary responsibility for operating each ESF. Other agencies are tasked with supporting roles. ESF’s are the functional support roles of the State Emergency Response Team (SERT). The details of each function are in the state plan. The details of how the jobs are to be done are in procedures developed by the primary agency of an ESF. These are the emergency support functions and the agencies with primary responsibility for them. These seventeen Emergency Support Functions are the backbone of Florida’s emergency management program. Listed below are the Emergency Support Functions and their agencies with primary and support responsibility: ESF 1 TRANSPORTATION Primary Agency: Department of Transportation Coordinate the use of transportation resources to support the needs of local governments, voluntary organizations and other emergency support groups requiring transportation capacity to perform their emergency response, recovery and assistance missions.
  • Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, 2004 by Brian A

    Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, 2004 by Brian A

    U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin June 2007, NCJ 212749 Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies, 2004 By Brian A. Reaves, Ph.D. State and local law enforcement agencies added fewer BJS Statistician officers from 2000 to 2004 than in prior 4-year periods In September 2004, 17,876 State and local law enforce- Four-year period ment agencies with the equivalent of at least 1 full-time officer were operating in the U.S. The total included: 2000-2004 • 12,766 local police departments 1996-2000 • 3,067 sheriffs' offices • 49 primary State law enforcement agencies 1992-1996 • 1,481 special jurisdiction agencies • 513 other agencies, primarily county constable offices 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 in Texas. Net increase in number of State and local full-time sworn personnel State and local law enforcement agencies employed nearly 1.1 million persons on a full-time basis, including 732,000 The number of total full-time employees per 100,000 resi- sworn personnel (defined in the census as those with gen- dents rose from 362 in 2000 to 367 in 2004; however, the eral arrest powers). These agencies also employed approx- number of full-time sworn officers per 100,000 residents imately 105,000 part-time employees, including 46,000 declined from 252 to 249. sworn officers. From 2000 to 2004, sworn employment rose by 1% in local Local police departments were the largest employer of police departments, 6% in sheriffs’ offices, and 2% in State sworn officers, accounting for 61% of the total.
  • State of Connecticut Criminal History Record Request Form (Please Type Or Print Clearly)

    State of Connecticut Criminal History Record Request Form (Please Type Or Print Clearly)

    STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY SERVICES AND PUBLIC PROTECTION Division of State Police State Police Bureau of Identification STATE OF CONNECTICUT CRIMINAL HISTORY RECORD REQUEST FORM (PLEASE TYPE OR PRINT CLEARLY) Check Type of Background Search Requested: ( ) CT Only search by Name/Date of Birth-$36.00 (will only provide existence of a record and not actual record) ( ) CT Only Criminal Conviction History Record Search-$75.00 (Name/DOB Search will provide a copy only if a record exists) ( ) CT Only Criminal Conviction History Record searched by Fingerprint-$75.00* *Fingerprinting completed at a Connecticut State Police location - $15.00 Name of Requester:____________________________________Date:____________________ Requester Address:____________________________________________________________ City:___________________State:______Zip:________Phone Number:___________________ E-Mail Address:________________________________________________________________________ (NOTE: If e-mail address is provided, results will be sent solely via e-mail) 1. Print full name and date of birth, maiden or alias names for each subject requested. 2. If a fingerprinted criminal history record check is required submit a Fingerprint card along with this form. 3. Enclose a Check or Money Order for the applicable amount made payable to: “Treasurer-State of CT” 4. If you are requesting more than one name please submit one check for the total dollar amount of all subjects requested. A separate form will be required for each search requested. 5. Mail Request
  • Research and Best Practices from the IACP Study on In-Car Cameras Field Research and Final Development Team

    Research and Best Practices from the IACP Study on In-Car Cameras Field Research and Final Development Team

    Research and Best Practices from the IACP Study on In-Car Cameras Field Research and Final Development Team: IACP Staff Editors: Technical Contributors: William Albright Grant Fredericks Project Assistant Vancouver Police Department (Ret.) Research Center Directorate Forensic Video Analyst, Avid Technology Cassie Cullen Jonathan W. Hak Research Intern Crown Prosecutor The Department of Justice, Alberta, BC Jack Grant Manager Christopher A. Kadoch State and Provincial Directorate Physicist, Video Evidence Management Expert Laura J. Nichols Charles Mazzone Project Manager Lt. Colonel (Retired) Programs & Research Activities Directorate Maryland State Police Angelique Savvakis John Oliphant Acting Project Assistant Grant Program Specialist Research Center Directorate Community Oriented Policing Services Laura Strick Krista Threefoot Research Intern Grant Program Specialist Community Oriented Policing Services Alison Vaughn Project Manager Lonnie J. Westphal Research Center Directorate Chief (Retired) Colorado State Patrol Acknowledgements: The International Association of Chiefs of Police, In-Car Camera Project staff would like to extend our sincerest appreciation to the following: • The Evaluation Team Members for their experience, diligence, and commitment throughout the evaluation process • The Advisory Board for their expertise and guidance to the In-Car Camera Project • The Chiefs, Commissioners, Directors and Superintendents of the 47 state and 2 beta sites for their support and cooperation throughout the evaluation process • The police
  • (Mefs) and Crash Modification Factors (Cmfs) for TSM&O Strategies

    (Mefs) and Crash Modification Factors (Cmfs) for TSM&O Strategies

    Developing Florida-specific Mobility Enhancement Factors (MEFs) and Crash Modification Factors (CMFs) for TSM&O Strategies Final Report FDOT Contract No: BDV29-977-46 Prepared by: Florida International University University of North Florida Dept. of Civil & Environmental Engineering School of Engineering 10555 West Flagler Street, EC 3628 1 UNF Drive Miami, FL 33174 Jacksonville, FL 32224 Prepared for: Research Center Florida Department of Transportation 605 Suwannee Street, MS 30 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Project Manager: Raj Ponnaluri, Ph.D., P.E., PTOE, PMP Co-Project Manager: Yujing "Tracey" Xie, P.E. March 2020 DISCLAIMER The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the State of Florida Department of Transportation. ii METRIC CONVERSION TABLE U.S. UNITS TO SI* (MODERN METRIC) UNITS SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.400 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.610 kilometers km mm millimeters 0.039 inches in m meters 3.280 feet ft m meters 1.090 yards yd km kilometers 0.621 miles mi SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL AREA in2 square inches 645.200 square mm2 millimeters ft2 square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.590 square kilometers km2 mm2 square millimeters 0.0016 square inches in2 m2 square meters 10.764 square feet ft2 m2 square meters 1.195 square yards yd2 ha hectares 2.470 acres ac km2 square kilometers 0.386 square miles mi2 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.570 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 mL milliliters 0.034 fluid ounces fl oz L liters 0.264 gallons gal m3 cubic meters 35.314 cubic feet ft3 m3 cubic meters 1.307 cubic yards yd3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1,000 L shall be shown in m3.
  • Connecticut 9-1-1 Public Safety Answering Points As of January 1St, 2014

    Connecticut 9-1-1 Public Safety Answering Points As of January 1St, 2014

    Connecticut 9-1-1 Public Safety Answering Points As of January 1st, 2014 North Canaan Enfield Colebrook Hartland Suffield PD ! Somers Union Salisbury Stafford Thompson Norfolk ! Enfield Granby PD Suffield Woodstock Canaan PD Granby ! East Winsted PD Granby Windsor Barkhamsted ! WLoin!cdskosr! East Tolland County Mutual Aid ECC ! CSP Troop H Locks Putnam Winchester PD Windsor Ellington (Bradley Intl CSP Troop C Eastford Putnam PD Simsbury PD Tolland Ashford ! Arpt) Windsor East Windsor )" Willington # Pomfret Canton Simsbury PD Sharon Bloomfield South Windsor Cornwall Goshen New PD ! Vernon PD Windsor South # Torrington Hartford Canton PD ! ! ! Windsor Vernon UConn PD Killingly Litchfield CD ! ! Bloomfield PD Quinebaug Valley ECC PD Hampton Brooklyn # Hartford Manchester Chaplin Avon PD West ! East ! Avon Hartford ECC ! Coventry Mansfield HaEratsft ord Manchester Burlington PD! Litchfield Harwinton ! )" HartPfoDrd PD Bolton Warren West HartforCdSP Troop H Kent )" Farmington PD Hartford Andover CSP Troop L Farmington ! ! ! Windham Scotland Sterling NewingW-Wetehethrsefierlsd- Glastonbury PD Columbia Plainfield Morris Bristol PD New ! Canterbury Thomaston ! Plainville New ton PD field PD Glastonbury Willimantic ! ! Britain New- Thomaston !PD Brita!in ! Switchboard Washington PD Plymouth Bristol Plainville ERC ington Rocky Hebron Watertown PD Rocky Hill ECC Bethlehem Plymouth Hill PD Watertown Southington Marlborough Lebanon Sprague New Milford ! ! Cromwell PD Wolcott Berlin PD Cromwell Franklin PD Southington PD Lisbon ! Berlin ! ! PD PD
  • Police Department

    Police Department

    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. Enhancing Public Safety by Leveraging Resources 0 --.. A Resource Guide for Law Enforcement Agencies J @ 0 @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ This project was supported by Award No. 2002-DD-BX-0010 awarded by @ the Bureau of Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs. The opinions, @ findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this @ publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the @ views of the Department of Justice. @ @ @ @ @ 0 0 2o 5957 0 0 0 Table of Contents 0 0 0 0 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... i 0 Part h Establishing or Enhancing a Volunteer Program 0 0 Section 1: Introduction .................................................................................................... 1 0 0 Section 2: The Current State of Volunteerism .............................................................. 4 0 Section 3: Building Program Infrastructure ................................................................. 8 0 0 Section 4: Recruitment ....................................................................................................16 0 0 Section 5: Selection and Management ..........................................................................20 0 Section 6: Training ..........................................................................................................24
  • Ground Team Member & Leader Reference Text

    Ground Team Member & Leader Reference Text

    Ground Team Member & Leader Reference Text Developed as part of the National Emergency Services Curriculum Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Description Page Table of Contents................................................................................................................................................i Introduction .........................................................................................................................................................ii Chapter 1 - SAR is an Emergency.....................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2 - Gear Types & Usage .....................................................................................................................4 Chapter 3 - Vehicle Inspection and Clearance ................................................................................................17 Chapter 4 - Natural Hazards, Field Sanitation, & Campsite Selection .........................................................19 Chapter 5 - Land Navigation .............................................................................................................................28 Chapter 6 - Electronic Direction Finding .........................................................................................................43 Chapter 7 - Land Search Methods....................................................................................................................46 Chapter 8 - Knots, Ropes, & Stretchers...........................................................................................................60
  • The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Statement of Agency Organization and Operation

    The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Statement of Agency Organization and Operation

    The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles Statement of Agency Organization and Operation This statement of agency organization and operation has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 28‐101.001, Florida Administrative Code and is available to any person upon request. The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (FLHSMV) was created by Chapter 20.24, Florida Statutes. The mission of FLHSMV is “Providing Highway Safety and Security Through Excellence in Service, Education, and Enforcement.” The department provides services by partnering with county tax collectors and local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies to promote a safe driving environment. The department coordinates with its partners to issue driver licenses and identification cards, facilitate motor vehicle transactions, and provide services related to consumer protection and public safety. The department is composed of four divisions: Florida Highway Patrol, Motorist Services, Administrative Services, and Information Systems Administration; these divisions are overseen by the Office of the Executive Director. The department’s duties, responsibilities, and procedures are mandated through Chapters 207, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 328, 488, and Section 627.730 – 627.7405, Florida Statutes as well as Chapter 15‐1 of the Florida Administrative Code. The agency head of the department is the Governor and Cabinet with authority delegated to the Executive Director. The Executive Director supervises, directs, coordinates, and administers all activities of the department. More information about the Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles can be found at www.flhsmv.gov, or by contacting us at the information below.