DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution/Creation Debate: a Rhetorical Analysis James V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1989 Evolution/Creation Debate: A Rhetorical Analysis James V. Miteff Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Speech Communication at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Miteff, James V., "Evolution/Creation Debate: A Rhetorical Analysis" (1989). Masters Theses. 2546. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2546 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS REPRODUCTION CERTIFICATE TO: Graduate Degree Candidate• who have written formal theses. SUBJECT: Permission to reproduce the11e11. The University Library is r�ceiving a num�er of requests from other institutions asking permission to reproduce. dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyri�ht laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy de�ands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow theses to be copied. Please sign one of the following statements: Booth Library of Eastern Illinoi� University has my permission to lend my thee.is to a reputable ·college or 'QJliversity for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that institution's library or· research holdings. Date I respectfully re.quest Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University not allow my thesis be reproduced because -------------- Date Author m EVOLUTIOR/CREATION DEBATE: A Rhetorical Analysis (TITLE) BY JAMES V. MITEFF THESIS SUBMITIED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts IN THE GRADUATESCHOOL, EASTERN IWNOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, IUINOIS 1989 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THIS THESIS BE ACCTPTEDAS FULFIWNG THIS PART OF THEGRADUATE DEGREECITED ABOVE 03- t1 I DATE , , ...... • ·r,· .,,. • :1,. ABSTRACT During the course of human history, many social issues have come and gone. One argull!ent that caught the writer's eye is the argument about how man came to exist. Purpose of Study The purpose of this study is to analyze an evolution/ creation debate that took place at Columbus College, Georgia, on May 6, 1981. Evolutionary theory was supported by Dr. Schwinner, a paleontologist from Columbus College. His partner was Dr. Frazier, a professor of geology at Columbus College. Creation theory was supported by Dr. Henry Morris, President of the Institute for Creation Research, San Diego, and Dr. Slusher, an astronomer and geophysicist from the University of Texas, El Paso. Hypothesis The working hypothesis is that an analysis of the language, arguments, and philosophical frameworks employed during a debate between scientists would yield a responsible perspective on theories of origin. Materials A transcript was made from a cassette tape of the evolution/ creation debate that took place at Columbus College. This debate was chosen because of its comprehensive coverage of arguments supporting evolution and creation. The debate was complete and uncut without editing. Methodology This paper applies a methodology created by B. F. McClerren and demonstrated in his rhetorical analysis: "The Rhetoric of Abortion: An Analysis," (unpublished paper, Eastern Illinois University, 1989). This methodology provides for three basic identifications: emotive language, modes of argument, and philosophical frameworks. Each is described in the paper. This methodology is applied to each debater. Conclusion The hypothesis was supported. The analysis revealed that the debaters marshaled their language and arguments to responsibly and clearly defend their respective philosophical frameworks. Because the writer cannot claim that all possible arguments about the evolution/creation issue were employed in the one debate studied, the following suggestions for further study using the same methodology are offered: 1. A study of the same debaters in different settings. 2. A study of other evolution/creation debates by other responsible debaters. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION. • . • • • . • 1 Purpose of the Study. • . 2 Signi ficance of the Study •••• 3 Review of Literature ••.••.•••• 4 Materials 5 Method. • 6 Procedure . • . 11 Organization of Study 11 I I. ANALYSIS. 13 I II. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION. 48 Summary • • • 48 Conclusion. • 55 APPEND IX A 57 REFERENCES • 201 ii Evol ution/Creation Page 1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCT ION During the course of human history a myriad of social issues have come and gone. In my br ief lifetime alone , I have witnessed the rise of such issues as the Vietnam War , abortion, the war on drugs , and others. One argument , however, which caught this wr i ter 's attention is the argument about how man came to ex ist. Although theor ies of the or igin of humankind have been debated since the dawn of recorded history, the debate has been of particular interest in the Uni ted States of America as shown by conf licting court cases and public debates. The speci fics that fol low indicate the historical conti nuum of the debate about origins. In 1926 , John T. Scopes was convi cted and fined for teaching the theory of evolution in Dayton , Tennessee . In 1976 <Ohio v. Wisner> the state court brought criminal charges against parents who put thei r children in a Christian school because the public school was teaching evolution and secular humanism. The Ohio Supreme Court ruled in favor of the parents and verified that secular humanism is a rel igion. In 1982 <McLean v. Arkansas) the Arkansas Supreme Court disal lowed al l views in science cl asses except those compat ible with Evolution/Creation Page 2 purely natural istic rel igions. Theories of evolution were retained. Creation theory was disal lowed. Clearly, the debate over origins is not settled. On the one hand , there is the evolutionist 's camp , and on the other there is the creationist 's camp. The evolut ionists have won the educational victory, but the ideological victory must still be won. The debates between these two factions wi ll no doubt continue for years to come. Mul finger (1970 , p.39> claims maki ng plausible guesses as to the origin of the uni verse is evidently a challenging pastime. To many , however , the debate is more than idle chatter. For the past fifteen years some very responsi ble debates about origins have taken place on col lege campuses in the United States. For example, creation scientists from the Institute for Creat ion Research have met evolution scientists before many col lege audiences. <A list is provi ded of these debates on page 5.) PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study is to anal yze a creation v. evolution debate that took place at Columbus Col lege Georgia, on May 6, 1981. Evolutionary theory was supported by Dr. Schwinner , a paleontologist from Columbus Col lege. His partner , Dr. Frazier, is a professor of Evolution/Creation Page 3 geology at Columbus Col lege. Creation theory was supported by Dr . Henry Morris, president of the Institute for Creation Research , San Diego , and Dr . Slusher , an astronomer and geophysicist from the University of Texas , El Paso . The wor king hypothesis is that an analysis of the language , arguments, and phi losophical frameworks employed during a debate between scientists would yield a responsible perspective on theor ies of or igin. SIGNif ICANCE OF THE STUDY The si gni ficance of this study is threefold: rhetorical , social , and personal . First the study is of value to those having an interst in rhetoric and public address. Weaver (1970, p. 105) insists that a large part of the world 's oral and written expression takes the form of argumentation. Examining the speeches of each participant in a debate provides rhetor ical insights. This study deals with a controversial issue that is current and of great interest in· our soc iety. Faced with opposing theories about ori gins, it seems most unscientific to withhold consideration of one of the theories if it does not fit one 's personal ideas of haw something happened <Hei nze, 1980 , p. 11> . This study gives society a bal anced view. Evoluti on/Creation Page 4 Final ly, this study is of personal value. It is a learning experience for the author. Thompson <1947 , p. 227> notes: The preparation of the thesis can be a rich educational experience which provides trai ning in research methods; requires the integration of the knowledge and the ski lls of several fields •••makes the student and expert within a defined area: and leads ta concl usi ons regarding the theory and practice of rhetoric in our own time. Hockett <1955 , p. 12> also advocates the personal value of a thesis • He claims: •••a master 's essay may make a real even if minor contribution ta historical knowledge and thus become a source of justifiable pr ide an the part of the author. More important •••is the discipl ine which should result from the use of the critical methods. REVIEW OF LITERATURE A review of literature revealed that this is an or iginal topic for a rhetor ical anal ysi s. The Index to Journal s in Communication Studies Through _1985 , was consul ted to determine if there lfJere any rel evant studies concerning theories of creation and evol ution. Several books did ai d in providing general background information. What is Creation Science? <Morris � Parker , 1984) . Creation vs. Evol ution Handbook , <Hei nz, 1980) �as also helpful . Evol ution/Creation Page 5 The other creati on-evolution debates , avai lable on tape and listed below, also aided my review. The creation debaters are listed first: 1. Morris, Gish v. Schweitzer , �ones, University of Tennessee , January 14, 1975. 2. Gish v. Robi nson , University of Wisconsin, February 10, 1978. 3. Morris, Gi sh v. Edward , Nol a, San Diego , Cal ifornia, April 12, 1978.
Recommended publications
  • The DIY STEN Gun

    The DIY STEN Gun

    The DIY STEN Gun Practical Scrap Metal Small Arms Vol.3 By Professor Parabellum Plans on pages 11 to 18 Introduction The DIY STEN Gun is a simplified 1:1 copy of the British STEN MKIII submachine gun. The main differences however include the number of components having been greatly reduced and it's overall construction made even cruder. Using the simple techniques described, the need for a milling machine or lathe is eliminated making it ideal for production in the home environment with very limited tools. For obvious legal reasons, the demonstration example pictured was built as a non-firing display replica. It's dummy barrel consists of a hardened steel spike welded and pinned in place at the chamber end and a separate solid front portion protruding from the barrel shroud for display. It's bolt is also inert with no firing pin. This document is for academic study purposes only. (Disassembled: Back plug, recoil spring, bolt, magazine, sear and trigger displayed) (Non-functioning dummy barrel present on display model) Tools & construction techniques A few very basic and inexpensive power tools can be used to simulate machining actions usually reserved for a milling machine. Using a cheap angle grinder the average hobbyist has the ability to perform speedy removal of steel using a variety of cutting and grinding discs. Rather than tediously using a hacksaw to cut steel sheet, an angle grinder fitted with a 1mm slitting disc will accurately cut a straight line through steel of any thickness in mere seconds. Fitted with a 2mm disc it can be used to easily 'sculpt' thick steel into any shape in a fraction of the time it takes to manually use a hand file.
  • Dolerites of Svalbard, North-West Barents Sea Shelf: Age, Tectonic Setting and Significance for Geotectonic Interpretation of Th

    Dolerites of Svalbard, North-West Barents Sea Shelf: Age, Tectonic Setting and Significance for Geotectonic Interpretation of Th

    RESEARCH/REVIEW ARTICLE Dolerites of Svalbard, north-west Barents Sea Shelf: age, tectonic setting and significance for geotectonic interpretation of the High-Arctic Large Igneous Province Krzysztof Nejbert1, Krzysztof P. Krajewski2, Elz˙bieta Dubin´ ska1 & Zolta´ nPe´ cskay3 1 Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Warsaw, Al. Z˙ wirki i Wigury 93, PL-02089 Warsaw, Poland 2 Institute of Geological Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, Research Centre in Warsaw, ul. Twarda 51/55, PL-00818 Warsaw, Poland 3 Institute of Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Bem te´ r 18/c, HU-4026 Debrecen, Hungary Keywords Abstract Dolerite; geochemistry; petrogenesis; KÁAr whole rock ages; Svalbard; Cretaceous. The dolerites of Svalbard are mineralogically and geochemically homogeneous with geochemical features typical of continental within-plate tholeiites. Their Correspondence geochemistry is similar to tholeiites belonging to a bimodal suite defined as the Krzysztof P. Krajewski, Institute of Geologi- High-Arctic Large Igneous Province (HALIP). KÁAr dating of numerous cal Sciences, Polish Academy of Sciences, dolerites sampled from many locations across Svalbard define a narrow time Research Centre in Warsaw, ul. Twarda 51/ span of this magmatism from 125.593.6 to 78.392.6 Mya. Discrete peaks of 55, PL-00818 Warsaw, Poland. E-mail: [email protected] intensive activity occurred at 115.3, 100.8, 91.3 and 78.5 Mya corresponding to (1) breakup of the continental crust and formation of an initial rift as a result of mantle plume activity, located in the southern part of the Alpha Ridge; (2) magmatic activity related to spreading along the Alpha Ridge that led to the development of the initial oceanic crust and (3) continuation of spreading along the Alpha Ridge and termination of magmatic activity related to HALIP (last two peaks at 91.3 and 78.5 Mya).
  • General Guide to the Science and Cosmos Museum

    General Guide to the Science and Cosmos Museum

    General guide to the Science and Cosmos Museum 1 Background: “Tenerife monts” and “Pico” near of Plato crater in the Moon PLANTA TERRAZA Terrace Floor 5 i 2 1 4 6 3 ASCENSOR 4 RELOJ DE SOL ECUATORIAL Elevator Analemmatic sundial i INFORMACIÓN 5 BUSTO PARLANTE Information “AGUSTÍN DE BETANCOURT” Agustín de Betancourt 1 PLAZA “AGUSTÍN DE talking bust BETANCOURT” Agustín de Betancourt 6 ZONA WI-FI Square Wi-Fi zone 2 ANTENA DE RADIOASTRONOMÍA Radioastronomy antenna 3 TELESCOPIO Telescope PLANTA BAJA Ground Floor WC 10 9 8 11 7 1 6 5 4 12 2 3 ASCENSOR Cosmos Lab - Creative Elevator Laboratory 1 EXPOSICIÓN 7 PLANETARIO Exhibition Planetarium 2 TALLER DE DIDÁCTICA 8 SALIDA DE EMERGENCIA Didactic Workshop Emergency exit 3 EFECTOS ÓPTICOS 9 MICROCOSMOS Optical illusions 10 SALÓN DE ACTOS 4 SALA CROMA KEY Assembly hall Chroma Key room 11 EXPOSICIONES TEMPORALES 5 LABERINTO DE ESPEJOS Temporary exhibitions Mirror Labyrinth 12 ZONA DE DESCANSO 6 COSMOS LAB - LABORATORIO Rest zone CREATIVO CONTENIDOS Contents 7 LA TIERRA The Earth 23 EL SOL The Sun 33 EL UNIVERSO The Universe 45 CÓMO FUNCIONA How does it work 72 EL CUERPO HUMANO The human body 5 ¿POR QUÉ PIRÁMIDES? Why pyramids? 1 Sacred places have often been con- ceived of as elevated spaces that draw the believer closer to the divi- nity. For this reason, once architec- tural techniques became sufficiently refined, mosques or cathedrals rai- sed their vaults, minarets, towers and spires to the sky. However, for thousands of years, the formula fa- voured by almost every culture was the pyramid.
  • A Christian Physicist Examines Noah's Flood and Plate Tectonics

    A Christian Physicist Examines Noah's Flood and Plate Tectonics

    A Christian Physicist Examines Noah’s Flood and Plate Tectonics by Steven Ball, Ph.D. September 2003 Dedication I dedicate this work to my friend and colleague Rodric White-Stevens, who delighted in discussing with me the geologic wonders of the Earth and their relevance to Biblical faith. Cover picture courtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey, copyright free 1 Introduction It seems that no subject stirs the passions of those intending to defend biblical truth more than Noah’s Flood. It is perhaps the one biblical account that appears to conflict with modern science more than any other. Many aspiring Christian apologists have chosen to use this account as a litmus test of whether one accepts the Bible or modern science as true. Before we examine this together, let me clarify that I accept the account of Noah’s Flood as completely true, just as I do the entirety of the Bible. The Bible demonstrates itself to be reliable and remarkably consistent, having numerous interesting participants in various stories through which is interwoven a continuous theme of God’s plan for man’s redemption. Noah’s Flood is one of those stories, revealing to us both God’s judgment of sin and God’s over-riding grace and mercy. It remains a timeless account, for it has much to teach us about a God who never changes. It is one of the most popular Bible stories for children, and the truth be known, for us adults as well. It is rather unfortunate that many dismiss the account as mythical, simply because it seems to be at odds with a scientific view of the earth.
  • Wegener and His Theory of Continental Drift

    Wegener and His Theory of Continental Drift

    GENERAL I ARTICLE Wegener and his Theory of Continental Drift Ramesh Chander Alfred Wegener, an astronomer by training and meteorologist by profession, visualised that there was once a single very large landmass on the surface of the earth. Gradually it broke up into smaller fragments which drifted away to form the present continents. In a few cases, the drifting fragments subsequently collided, coalesced and Ramesh Chander is a formed larger landmasses again. Wegener could thus Professor at the Universit}' explain in a simple way (i) similarities in shapes of of Rool'kee, engaged in diverse studies related to continental coast lines separated by wide oceans, (ii) natural earthquakes in the similarities in the rocks and fossils occurring on such Himalaya as well as coasts and in the fauna and flora inhabiting them, (ill) the modelling of reservoir­ formation of several major mountain ranges of the world, induced earthquakes in that region. and (iv) the evidence in rocks on past climates ofthe earth. Introduction Astronomers take immense delight in enumerating the various motions that we partake even as we are apparently stationary on the surface of the earth. Geophysicists, the people who apply the principles of physics to investigate the earth, gleefully add that the surface of the terra firma itself is not steady but responds pliantly to many causes in the earth's interior and on its surface as well as to a few causes in the solar system. Occasionally, we can feel the motion of the earth's surface directly for brief periods, as during a major earthquake or when a heavy object moves near us.
  • The Owen Gun Story in Brief

    The Owen Gun Story in Brief

    lllawarra Historical Society Bulletin 1st November, 1982 71 THE OWEN GUN STORY IN BRIEF Around July 1939, the late Evelyn (Evo) Owen, then a civilian, submitted the .22 submachine gun he had invented to the Army Inventions Board, Victoria Barracks, Melbourne. After study, they stated they had no interest in it nor in any submachine gun-the policy of the British Army until the outbreak of World War II in Sep­ tember 1939. Owen enlisted and when on final leave in September 1940 he was seconded to the Army Inventions Board with an offer from Lysaght's Works Pty. Ltd., Port Kembla, to assisst the A.I.B. in mak­ ing up a trial model for the testing of Owen's last ideas. After some months of delay, Owen was given leave of absence and came to Lysaght's with a personal request from Captain C. M. Dyer, the Sec­ retary of the A.I.B., that Lysaght's make a trial gun to Owen's ideas. Though the Army stated that the gun should be for .38 revolver ammunition-the only small ammunition projected for manufacture in Australia-none was available, so .32 was chosen. The gun with single line side magazine was made by Lysaght's in three weeks and successfully test fired by the end of January 1941. Owen returned to the A.I.B. and after further discussions came back to Lysaght's at the end of February 1941 with fresh ideas. These were for a gun in .45 calibre (standard with the Thompson) operating on the same principle as the .32 but with a completely different configuration.
  • Owen Submachine Gun.Nomination

    Owen Submachine Gun.Nomination

    Nomination of OWEN SUBMACHINE GUN for an Engineering Heritage National Marker Owen Gun Mark 1/42 - skeleton stock, cooling fins on barrel source gunshows.com.nz Owen Gun Mark 1/43 - wooden stock, camouflage finish by Doug Boleyn Engineering Heritage Sydney January 2017 Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Nomination Letter 4 3. Nomination Support Information Basic Data 5 4. Basic History 8 5. Engineering Heritage Assessment 11 6. Interpretation Plan 14 7. References & Acknowledgements 15 Appendices 1. Statement of Support for Engineering Heritage Recognition 16 2. History Time Line of the Owen Submachine Gun 17 3. Photos of the Owen Submachine Gun and other submachine guns used 28 in World War 2 4. Drawings of the Owen Submachine Gun 34 5. Statistics of the various models of the Owen Gun and Comparison Table 35 6. Biographies of Companies and People Associated with the Owen Gun 39 7. Glossary Terminology and Imperial Unit Conversions 44 8. Author's Assessment of Engineering Heritage Significance Check List 45 Rev 05 01 17 Page 1 1. Introduction. The Owen submachine gun [SMG] (1) that bears its designer's name was the only weapon of World War 2 used by Australian troops that was wholly designed and manufactured in Australia. Conceptually designed by Evelyn Owen, a committed young inventor, the concept was further developed to production stage by Gerard Wardell Chief Engineer Lysaght's Newcastle Works Pty Limited - Port Kembla Branch (2) [Lysaghts] with the assistance of Evelyn Owen ( and Fred Kunzler a Lysaght employee who had been a gunsmith in his native Switzerland.
  • Planetarium Handbook

    Planetarium Handbook

    Portable Planetarium Handbook Susan Reynolds Button, Editor July 2002 Table of Contents Section I. Table of Contents .................................................................................... 1 Section II. Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 Section III. Contributors............................................................................................. 1 Section IV. Practical Applications of Portable Planetariums...................................1 A. Introduction: “Why are Portable Planetariums so Special?” .......................2 1. “Twenty Years on the Road: The Portable Planetarium’s Development and Contributions to the Teaching of Astronomy” ......................................................................................3 2. “Outreach: The Long Arm of STARLAB”.......................................18 3. “Professionalism and Survival Tactics” ..........................................20 B. Outreach with a Planetarium Specialist ....................................................22 1. “Reach Out and Teach Someone” ................................................ 23 2. “Student Intern/Mentor Program Proposal”................................... 26 3. “Student-Directed Planetarium Lessons and Other Creative Uses For STARLAB”..................................................................... 27 C. Outreach-Lending/Rental Programs and Teacher Training ..................... 30 1. “Unmanned Satellite” ...................................................................
  • The Tertiary Orogenic Belt of West-Spitsbergen: Seismic Expressions of the Offshore Sedimentary Basins

    The Tertiary Orogenic Belt of West-Spitsbergen: Seismic Expressions of the Offshore Sedimentary Basins

    The Tertiary orogenic belt of West-Spitsbergen: Seismic expressions of the offshore sedimentary basins OLA EIKEN & ATLE AUSTEGARD Eiken, O. & Austegard, A.: The Tertiary orogenic belt of West-Spitsbergen: Seismic expressions of the offshore sedimentary basins. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, Vol. 67, pp. 383-394. Oslo 1987. ISSN 0029- 196X. Sedimentary basins west of the exposed part of the West-Spitsbergen orogenic belt have been outlined by seismic reflection data. Narrow, fault-bounded grabens are infilled from both sides, with syn­ sedimentary movement and weak compression of the whole sequence. The grabens are probably all of Tertiary age. Sediment thicknesses are up to 4 km and widths are up to 15-20km. The main graben starts in the north with the Forlandsundet graben and is offset outside Isfjorden and possibly south of Bellsund. We are not able to discriminate between an extensional and a strike-slip model of graben-formation. Based on lateral velocity variations and thickness of post-rift sediments on the outer shelf and slope west of Spitsbergen, we assume 1-2 km of Tertiary sediments have been eroded from the offshore basins and 3 km in central Spitsbergen. Ola Eiken, Atle Austegard, Seismological Observatory, University of Bergen, Allegt. 41, 5000 Bergen, Norway. Svalbard is located at the northwestern corner of inner part of the shelf. Schluter & Hinz (1978) the Eurasian plate. A young (Tertiary) fold belt indicate vaguely some faulting inside the exists along its western margin (Fig. 1). Con­ Hornsund Lineament, but Myhre (1984) shows tinuation of this Tertiary orogeny is not seen on no fault interpretation using the same data.
  • Inheriting the Earth

    Inheriting the Earth

    Earth Science, Astronomy and Space Astronomy Inheriting the Earth The Structure of the Earth The Crust as a Dynamic System Earthquakes, Volcanoes and Tsunamis Geological History The Universe The Journey of a Star The Solar System Space Technology Project by Asian Geographic Magazines Pte Ltd Publisher: John Thet Senior: Editor Lunita S V Mendoza Editor: Shreya Gopi Proofreader: Ian Seldrup Writers: J R Kayal, Yoav Bar-Ness, Astrid S Tiefholz and Moustafa Osman (Osman Consulting Ltd.) Designer: Zoey Lim Photos: Wikimedia Commons, USGS, NASA, NOAA Distributed by Young Prodigy Production (Thailand) co., Ltd 71/26 Soi Tan Phu Ying Phahol, Ladyao, Jatujak, Bangkok 10900 Tel: 02 – 9412349 ext 36 Fax: 02 – 941 2969 1 Chapter page CONTENTS 1 4 THE STRUCTURE OF THE EARTH • A Spherical Orb • The Spheres – Inside the Earth • The External Spheres • The Dimensions of the Sphere • The Heart of the Planet • The Furnace at the Core • The Mantle • The Crust: Ocean and Continent 2 10 THE CRUST AS A DYNAMIC SYSTEM • What Are Tectonic Plates? • The Dance of the Continents • Evidence for Continental Drift • The Supercontinents of the Distant Past • Plate Tectonic Boundaries: • Understanding the Map • Divergent Plates – Drivers of Motion • The Mid-Atlantic Ridge – Mover of Continents • Magnetic Stripes • Convergent Plates – Titanic Collisions • Smashing Lands – Continental Convergences • Destruction: Ocean Crust versus Continental Crust • Ocean Crustal Collisions – Arcs of Islands • Transform Boundaries – When Plates Slide Past • On Land and Under Sea 3 20
  • An Access-Dictionary of Internationalist High Tech Latinate English

    An Access-Dictionary of Internationalist High Tech Latinate English

    An Access-Dictionary of Internationalist High Tech Latinate English Excerpted from Word Power, Public Speaking Confidence, and Dictionary-Based Learning, Copyright © 2007 by Robert Oliphant, columnist, Education News Author of The Latin-Old English Glossary in British Museum MS 3376 (Mouton, 1966) and A Piano for Mrs. Cimino (Prentice Hall, 1980) INTRODUCTION Strictly speaking, this is simply a list of technical terms: 30,680 of them presented in an alphabetical sequence of 52 professional subject fields ranging from Aeronautics to Zoology. Practically considered, though, every item on the list can be quickly accessed in the Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary (RHU), updated second edition of 2007, or in its CD – ROM WordGenius® version. So what’s here is actually an in-depth learning tool for mastering the basic vocabularies of what today can fairly be called American-Pronunciation Internationalist High Tech Latinate English. Dictionary authority. This list, by virtue of its dictionary link, has far more authority than a conventional professional-subject glossary, even the one offered online by the University of Maryland Medical Center. American dictionaries, after all, have always assigned their technical terms to professional experts in specific fields, identified those experts in print, and in effect held them responsible for the accuracy and comprehensiveness of each entry. Even more important, the entries themselves offer learners a complete sketch of each target word (headword). Memorization. For professionals, memorization is a basic career requirement. Any physician will tell you how much of it is called for in medical school and how hard it is, thanks to thousands of strange, exotic shapes like <myocardium> that have to be taken apart in the mind and reassembled like pieces of an unpronounceable jigsaw puzzle.
  • Page 207 TITLE 18—CRIMES and CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 921

    Page 207 TITLE 18—CRIMES and CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 921

    Page 207 TITLE 18—CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE § 921 Mandatory punishment provision was rephrased in CHAPTER 44—FIREARMS the alternative. Minor changes were made in phraseology. Sec. 921. Definitions. AMENDMENTS 922. Unlawful acts. 1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted ‘‘fined under this 923. Licensing. title’’ for ‘‘fined not more than $5,000’’. 924. Penalties. 925. Exceptions: Relief from disabilities. § 916. 4–H Club members or agents 925A. Remedy for erroneous denial of firearm. 926. Rules and regulations. Whoever, falsely and with intent to defraud, 926A. Interstate transportation of firearms. holds himself out as or represents or pretends 926B. Carrying of concealed firearms by qualified himself to be a member of, associated with, or law enforcement officers. an agent or representative for the 4–H clubs, an 926C. Carrying of concealed firearms by qualified retired law enforcement officers. organization established by the Extension Serv- 927. Effect on State law. ice of the United States Department of Agri- 928. Separability. culture and the land grant colleges, shall be 929. Use of restricted ammunition. fined under this title or imprisoned not more 930. Possession of firearms and dangerous weapons than six months, or both. in Federal facilities. 931. Prohibition on purchase, ownership, or pos- (June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 743; Pub. L. session of body armor by violent felons. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(F), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.) AMENDMENTS 2004—Pub. L. 108–277, §§ 2(b), 3(b), July 22, 2004, 118 HISTORICAL AND REVISION NOTES Stat. 866, 867, added items 926B and 926C. Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 76c (June 5, 1939, 2002—Pub.