DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplementary Material

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplementary Material Scolopax rusticola (Eurasian Woodcock) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 4 Sources of reported national population data p. 6 Species factsheet bibliography p. 11 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Scolopax rusticola (Eurasian Woodcock) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (calling/lekking Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality males)3 Albania 0-50 <1 2002-2012 poor ? ? Andorra 15-30 <1 1999-2001 poor ? ? Armenia 200-400 <1 2002-2012 medium ? ? Austria 2,000-10,000 <1 2001-2012 poor ? ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Belarus 100,000-120,000 1 2000-2012 medium 0 0 2000-2012 medium 0 0 1980-2012 medium Belgium 1,000-5,000 <1 2008-2012 poor 0 0 2000-2012 poor 0 0 1973-2012 poor Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Bosnia & HG 50-100 <1 2010-2014 poor ? F 20-30 1980-2013 poor Bulgaria 90-180 <1 2005-2012 medium ? ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Croatia 10-50 <1 2010 poor ? ? Czech Rep. 2,000-4,000 <1 2001-2003 good ? + 1985-2003 poor Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Denmark 2,000 <1 2011 medium 0 0 1999-2011 medium + 50-100 1980-2011 medium Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Estonia 30,000-60,000 1 2008-2012 medium 0 0-10 2001-2012 medium 0 0-10 1980-2012 medium Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Finland 150,000-220,000 2 2006-2012 good 0 0 2006-2012 good + 17-156 1983-2012 good Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa France 10,000 <1 2008-2012 poor 0 0 2001-2012 good 0 0 1992-2012 good Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Georgia Present <1 ? ? Germany 20,000-39,000 <1 2005-2009 good 0 0 1998-2009 medium 0 0 1985-2009 medium Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Greece 0-10 <1 2008-2012 poor 0 0 2001-2012 poor 0 0 1980-2012 poor Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Hungary 10 <1 2000-2002 poor ? ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Rep. Ireland Present <1 1991 poor 0 0 2000-2011 medium ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Italy 50-150 <1 2004 poor ? ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Kosovo 50-80 <1 2009-2014 good ? ? Latvia 10,925-104,363 <1 2007 poor - 2-99 2005-2012 poor + 0-150 1994-2012 poor Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Liechtenstein 5-8 <1 2009-2014 good 0 0 2003-2014 good + 40-50 1980-2014 medium Lithuania 10,000-20,000 <1 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 medium 0 0 1980-2012 medium Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Luxembourg Present <1 ? ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa FYRO Macedonia 30-90 <1 2001-2012 poor ? ? Montenegro 100-200 <1 2002-2012 medium ? ? Netherlands 1,000-5,000 <1 2008-2011 poor ? ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Norway 50,000-100,000 1 2013 poor ? ? Poland 20,000-100,000 1 1992-2004 poor ? ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa PT: Azores 1,900-3,800 <1 2002-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 medium ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Scolopax rusticola (Eurasian Woodcock) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (calling/lekking Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality males)3 PT: Madeira 162 <1 2010 good - 2001-2012 poor - 1980-2012 poor Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Romania 1,000-5,000 <1 2001-2013 poor ? ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Russia 6,000,000-7,000,000 84 2000-2010 medium 0 0 2000-2012 medium - 5-30 1980-2012 poor Serbia 600-900 <1 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2000-2012 medium 0 0 1980-2012 medium Slovakia 1,300-2,500 <1 2009-2011 medium - 10-20 2000-2012 medium - 10-30 1980-2012 medium Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Slovenia 20-40 <1 1998-2011 medium - 50-70 2001-2012 poor - 70-80 1980-2012 medium Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Spain 3,600-4,000 <1 1998-2002 medium 0 0 1998-2002 medium 0 0 1980-2002 medium Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa ES: Canary Is 1,000-2,500 <1 1997-2003 poor ? ? Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Sweden 396,000-774,000 8 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 good 0 0 1980-2012 medium Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Switzerland 1,130-1,630 <1 2008-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 poor - 29-59 1990-2012 poor Turkey 10-100 <1 2013 poor ? - 20-29 1990-2013 poor Ukraine 7,600-12,800 <1 2000 medium F 10-20 1998-2010 medium F 20-30 1980-2010 medium United Kingdom 64,000-100,000 1 2003 medium - 25 2003-2012 medium - 15 1980-2010 medium Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa EU27 728,000-1,470,000 13 Decreasing Europe 6,890,000-8,710,000 100 Stable 1 See 'Sources' at end of factsheet, and for more details on individual EU Member State reports, see the Article 12 reporting portal at http://bd.eionet.europa.eu/article12/report. 2 The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. 3 In the few cases where population size estimates were reported in units other than those specified, they were converted to the correct units using standard correction factors. 4 The robustness of regional trends to the effects of any missing or incomplete data was tested using plausible scenarios, based on other sources of information, including any other reported information, recent national Red Lists, scientific literature, other publications and consultation with relevant experts. 5 Trend directions are reported as: increasing (+); decreasing (-); stable (0); fluctuating (F); or unknown (?). 6 Trend magnitudes are rounded to the nearest integer. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Trend maps A symbol appears in each country where the species occurs: the shape and colour of the symbol represent the population trend in that country, and the size of the symbol corresponds to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. KEY Ç Large increase (≥50%) È Large decrease (≥50%) Ç Moderate increase (20–49%) È Moderate decrease (20–49%) Ç Small increase (<20%) È Small decrease (<20%) ñ Increase of unknown magnitude ò Decrease of unknown magnitude å Stable or fluctuating 0 Unknown ¢ Present (no population or trend data) Ð Extinct since 1980 Each symbol, with the exception of Present and Extinct, may occur in up to three different size classes, corresponding to the proportion of the European population occurring in that country. ñ Large: ≥10% of the European population ñ Medium: 1–9% of the European population ñ Small: <1% of the European population The designation of geographical entities and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Figure 1. Breeding population sizes and short-term trends across Europe. Figure 2. Breeding population sizes and long-term trends across Europe. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Scolopax rusticola (Eurasian Woodcock) Sources Albania Breeding population size: Bino pers. obs. Andorra Breeding population size: BirdLife International 2004 Armenia Breeding population size: ASPB data Austria: Europe/South & West Europe & North Africa Breeding population size: BirdLife Austria, extrapolation on the basis of available unpublished and published population and density data Breeding short-term trend: BirdLife Austria, estimate on the basis of available unpublished and published trend data Belarus Breeding population size: Karlionova N.V. - personal communication Pinchuk P.V.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio Birding Checklist with Difficulty Codes Daily/Year/Life
    Ohio Birding Checklist with ____ Common Merganser 2 ____ Belted Kingfisher 1 ____ Louisiana Waterthrush 2 ____ Red-breasted Merganser 1 ____ Red-headed Woodpecker 2 ____ Northern Waterthrush 2 Difficulty Codes ____ Ruddy Duck 1 ____ Red-bellied Woodpecker 1 ____ Blue-winged Warbler 1 ____ Wild Turkey 2 ____ Yellow-bellied Sapsucker 2 ____ Black-and-white Warbler 1 Daily/Year/Life ________________ ____ Pied-billed Grebe 1 ____ Downy Woodpecker 1 ____ Prothonotary Warbler 2 ____ Horned Grebe 1 ____ Hairy Woodpecker 1 ____ Tennessee Warbler 2 This checklist is arranged in three sections, each ____ Rock Pigeon 1 ____ Northern Flicker 1 ____ Nashville Warbler 1 corresponding to a pair of difficulty codes. The ____ Mourning Dove 1 ____ Pileated Woodpecker 1 ____ Kentucky Warbler 2 six codes/descriptions are based primarily on the ____ Yellow-billed Cuckoo 2 ____ American Kestrel 1 ____ Common Yellowthroat 1 collective experience of Greg Miller and Dan ____ Common Nighthawk 2 ____ Eastern Wood-Pewee 2 ____ Hooded Warbler 1 Sanders. Overall abundance and ease of ____ Chimney Swift 1 ____ Acadian Flycatcher 2 ____ American Redstart 1 identification have been factored into each of the ____ Ruby-throated Hummingbird 1 ____ Willow Flycatcher 2 ____ Cape May Warbler 2 six codes and are as follows: ____ Virginia Rail 2 ____ Least Flycatcher 1 ____ Cerulean Warbler 2 ____ Sora 1 ____ Eastern Phoebe 1 ____ Northern Parula 2 Easier to See Birds ____ Common Gallinule 2 ____ Great Crested Flycatcher 1 ____ Magnolia Warbler 1 1. Readily found within expected habitat ____ American Coot 1 ____ Eastern Kingbird 1 ____ Bay-breasted Warbler 2 during at least one season of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Red and Fallow Deer Determine the Density of Ixodes Ricinus Nymphs Containing Anaplasma Phagocytophilum
    Red and Fallow Deer Determine the Density of Ixodes Ricinus Nymphs Containing Anaplasma Phagocytophilum Katsuhisa Takumi ( [email protected] ) Centre for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology Centre for Infectious Disease Control National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) Bilthoven The Netherlands Tim Hofmeester Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences Hein Sprong Centre for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology Centre for Infectious Disease Control National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) Bilthoven The Netherlands Research Keywords: Ixodes ricinus nymphs, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, phagocytophilum, anaplasmosis Posted Date: October 26th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-96286/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published on January 19th, 2021. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04567-4. 1 Red and fallow deer determine the density of Ixodes ricinus 2 nymphs containing Anaplasma phagocytophilum 1, 2 1 3 Katsuhisa Takumi ✉, Tim R. Hofmeester , and Hein Sprong 4 1 Centre for Zoonoses and Environmental Microbiology Centre for Infectious Disease Control 5 National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) Bilthoven The Netherlands 6 2 Department of Wildlife Fish and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural 7 Sciences Skogsmarksgränd 7 907 36 Umeå Sweden 8 ✉ Correspondence: Katsuhisa Takumi <[email protected]> 9 1 10 Abstract 11 Background: The density of Ixodes ricinus nymphs infected with Anaplasma phagocytophilum 12 is one of the parameters that determines the risk for humans and domesticated animals to 13 contract anaplasmosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Weather Conditions on the Spring Migration of Eurasian Woodcock and Consequences for Breeding
    Ibis (2018) doi: 10.1111/ibi.12657 Effect of weather conditions on the spring migration of Eurasian Woodcock and consequences for breeding KEVIN LE REST,1* ANDREW HOODLESS,2 CHRISTOPHER HEWARD,2 JEAN-LOUIS CAZENAVE3 & YVES FERRAND1 1Office National de la Chasse et de la Faune Sauvage, 8 boulevard Albert Einstein, Nantes, 44300, France 2Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK 3Club National des Becassiers, 105 rue Louis Pergaud, Villeneuve, Champniers, 16430, France Migration is a critical period of time with fitness consequences for birds. The develop- ment of tracking technologies now allows researchers to examine how different aspects of bird migration affect population dynamics. Weather conditions experienced during migration are expected to influence movements and, subsequently, the timing of arrival and the energetic costs involved. We analysed satellite-tracking data from 68 Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola fitted with Argos satellite tags in the British Isles and France (2012–17). First, we evaluated the effect of weather conditions (temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, atmospheric stability and visibility) on migration movements of individuals. Then we investigated the consequences for breeding success (age ratio) and brood precocity (early-brood ratio) population-level indices while accounting for cli- matic variables on the breeding grounds. Air temperature, wind and relative humidity were the main variables related to migration movements, with high temperatures and northward winds greatly increasing the probability of onward flights, whereas a trend towards greater humidity over 4 days decreased the probability of movement. Breeding success was mostly affected by climatic variables on the breeding grounds. The propor- tion of juveniles in autumn was negatively correlated with temperature in May, but posi- tively correlated with precipitation in June and July.
    [Show full text]
  • Migration Timing, Routes, and Connectivity of Eurasian Woodcock Wintering in Britain and Ireland
    Migration Timing, Routes, and Connectivity of Eurasian Woodcock Wintering in Britain and Ireland ANDREW N. HOODLESS,1 Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK CHRISTOPHER J. HEWARD, Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust, Burgate Manor, Fordingbridge, Hampshire SP6 1EF, UK ABSTRACT Migration represents a critical time in the annual cycle of Eurasian woodcock (Scolopax rusticola), with poten- tial consequences for individual fitness and survival. In October–December, Eurasian woodcock migrate from breeding grounds in northern Eurasia over thousands of kilometres to western Europe, returning in March–May. The species is widely hunted in Europe, with 2.3–3.5 million individuals shot per year; hence, an understanding of the timing of migra- tion and routes taken is an essential part of developing sustainable flyway management. Our aims were to determine the timing and migration routes of Eurasian woodcock wintering in Britain and Ireland, and to assess the degree of connec- tivity between breeding and wintering sites. We present data from 52 Eurasian woodcock fitted with satellite tags in late winter 2012–2016, which indicate that the timing of spring departure varied annually and was positively correlated with temperature, with a mean departure date of 26 March (± 1.4 days SE). Spring migration distances averaged 2,851 ± 165 km (SE), with individuals typically making 5 stopovers. The majority of our sample of tagged Eurasian woodcock migrated to breeding sites in northwestern Russia (54%), with smaller proportions breeding in Denmark, Scandinavia, and Finland (29%); Poland, Latvia, and Belarus (9.5%); and central Russia (7.5%). The accumulated migration routes of tagged individ- uals suggest a main flyway for Eurasian woodcock wintering in Britain and Ireland through Belgium, the Netherlands, and Germany, and then dividing to pass through the countries immediately north and south of the Baltic Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Illegal Killing and Taking of Birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus
    Review of illegal killing and taking of birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus Overview of main outputs of the project The information collated and analysed during this project has been summarised in a variety of outputs: 1. This full report Presenting all the aspects of the project at regional and national levels http://www.birdlife.org/illegal-killing 2. Scientific paper Presenting results of the regional assessment of scope and scale of illegal killing and taking of birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus1 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bird-conservation-international 3. Legislation country factsheets Presenting a review of national legislation on hunting, trapping and trading of birds in each assessed country http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/country (under ‘resources’ tab) 4. ‘The Killing 2.0’ Layman’s report Short communications publication for publicity purposes with some key headlines of the results of the project and the previous one focussing on the Mediterranean region http://www.birdlife.org/illegal-killing Credits of front cover pictures 1 2 3 4 1 Hen harrier Circus cyaneus © RSPB 2 Illegal trapping of Hen Harrier in the UK © RSPB 3 Common Coot (Fulica atra) © MISIK 4 Illegal trade of waterbirds illegally killed in Azerbaijan © AOS Citation of the report BirdLife International (2017) Review of illegal killing and taking of birds in Northern and Central Europe and the Caucasus. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International. 1 Paper in revision process for publication in Bird Conservation International in October 2017 when this report is released 1 Executive Summary The illegal killing and taking of wild birds remains a major threat on a global scale.
    [Show full text]
  • Survival Rates of Russian Woodcocks
    Proceedings of an International Symposium of the Wetlands International Woodcock and Snipe Specialist Group Survival rates of Russian Woodcocks Isabelle Bauthian, Museum national d’histoire naturelle, Centre de recherches sur la biologie des populations d’oiseaux, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] Ivan Iljinsky, State University of St Petersburg, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Sergei Fokin, State Informational-Analytical Center of Game Animals and Environment Group. Woodcock, Teterinsky Lane, 18, build. 8, 109004 Moscow, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] Romain Julliard, Museum national d’histoire naturelle, Centre de recherches sur la biologie des populations d’oiseaux, 55 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France. E-mail: [email protected] François Gossmann, Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage, 53 rue Russeil, 44 000 Nantes, France. E-mail: [email protected] Yves Ferrand, Office national de la chasse et de la faune sauvage, BP 20 - 78612 Le-Perray-en-Yvelines Cedex, France. E-mail: [email protected] We analysed 324 recoveries from 2,817 Russian Woodcocks ringed as adult or yearling in two areas in Russia (Moscow and St Petersburg). We suspected that birds belonging to these two areas may experience different hunting pressure or climatic conditions, and thus exhibit different demographic parameters. To test this hypothesis, we analysed spatial and temporal distribution of recoveries, and performed a ringing-recovery analysis to estimate possible survival differences between these two areas. We used methods developed by Brownie et al. in 1985. We found differences in temporal variations of the age ratio between the two ringing areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Iceland Trip Report 2015
    Iceland Trip Report May 27 to June 5, 2015 (10 days) Trip report compiled by Tour Leader Gaukur Hjartarson Iceland May & June 2015 Tour Summary May 27: The tour leader picked up all five participants at Keflavík International Airport at noon. The tour started with a known rarity at Keflavík, namely an adult drake White-winged Scoter, on the way from the pick-up site to a nearby restaurant for lunch. After lunch we scanned the Garðskagi peninsula near the international airport at Keflavík. We picked up many of the common local birds, including several Manx Shearwaters and a Purple Sandpiper. Luckily we also discovered two vagrants near Garður and had good views of a beautiful male Lapland Longspur and a Canada Goose. We then continued birding along the road to our first accommodation at Borgarnes. At Akranes we managed to see a vagrant Common Swift that had been seen there for some days. After finishing dinner at our hotel we made an evening tour to search for Eurasian Woodcocks. On the way to the site we saw a distant adult White-tailed Eagle and some Common Shelducks. We then managed to find a single Woodcock at an expected site despite some extremely cold weather. On the first day we saw a total of 45 species of birds. Photo 1. White-winged Scoter, Keflavík. Photo: Merilyn Browne. May 28: On the second day we left Borgarnes and drove to the Snæfellsnes peninsula. The day started very well with good views of an immature White-tailed Eagle near the road at Mýrar.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax Rusticola
    Key concepts of Article 7(4): Version 2008 Species no. 50: Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola Distribution: The Eurasian Woodcock has an extensive Palaearctic distribution. It breeds from the Azores and Ireland to the pacific coast of Russia. Birds winter in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, India and Southeast Asia to Japan. In Europe breeding occurs from Fennoscandia and Russia to the Mediterranean basin and the Canary Islands. Movements: Breeding populations in western maritime countries are sedentary, whilst those elsewhere are migratory. Scandinavian populations move southwest to winter mainly in Britain and France. Finnish birds move mainly south and winter mostly in Italy and the Balkans. Autumn movements start after the onset of frosts. Birds from the large Russian population are recorded wintering across most of West and Central Europe. The majority of birds are in their winter quarters by November but further (sometimes large scale) movements may occur in response to cold weather. Return migration starts in February in the Mediterranean region and the first half of March elsewhere. Population size and trends: The Woodcock is a difficult bird to count accurately. The European breeding population is estimated at 1,800,000 – 6,600,000 pairs of which 1,200,000 - 5,000,000 breeds in Russia (BirdLife Int. 2004A). The EU 27 population is estimated at 460,000 - 1,500,000 pairs (BirdLife Int. 2004A, 2004B). During 1990-2000 trends were stable across most of its European range, but declining in its Russian stronghold resulting in an overall moderate decline in Europe (>10%) (BirdLife Int. 2004A). Biological and behavioural aspects: Breeding: clutch size is usually 4 eggs (2-5); incubation 21-24 days; fledging period 15-20 days but sometimes able to get off ground at 10 days; independence: 5-6 weeks after hatching; brood: normally one brood.
    [Show full text]
  • Etc 2015 Award Winners
    10. ETC ® Oulu / Finland, May 11 – 17, 2015 Winners List (all awards and special awards): Novice Division (Best of Division Places): 1. Sandie Miransky (Denmark), Category NB, Rook ( Corvus frugilegus ) 2. Marko Väkiparta (Finland), Category NG, White-tailed Deer ( Odocoileus virginianus ) 3. Marko Väkiparta (Finland), Category NM, Lynx ( Lynx lynx ) Professional Division (Best of Category Places): (there must be at least 90 out of 100 points achieved, so it can happen that in some categories not all or even no places were given out) Category PB2 „Medium Birds“ 1. Roland Csernák (Hungary), Eurasian Woodcock ( Scolopax rusticola ) 2. Narvydas Stankevicius (Lithuania), Mandarin Duck ( Aix galericulata ) Category PB4 „Bird Groups“ 1. Jaap van den Berg (Netherlands), 2 Garganeys ( Anas querquedula ) Category PM2 „Medium Mammals“ 1. Darius Dauksa (Lithuania), Crested Porcupine ( Histrix cristata ) Category PG1 „Small Game Heads“ 1. Jaakko Tauriainen (Finland), Red Fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) Category PG3 „Large Game Heads“ 1. Kestutis Bybartas (Lithuania), Moose ( Alces alces ) 2. Ivan Prokaza (Latvia), Wild Boar ( Sus scrofa ) Category PRA1 „Reptiles/Amphibians“ 1. Tom Hoogesteger (Finland), Massasauga Rattlesnake (Sistrurus catenatus ) Masters Division (Best of Europe Titles): (there must be at least 90 out of 100 points achieved, so it can happen that in some categories not all or even no titles were given out) Birds „Best of Europe” Jürgen Fiebig (Germany), MB4 Helmeted Curassow (Pauxi pauxi ) „Second of Europe“ Robert Stein (Germany), MB3 Southern Cassowary ( Casuarius casuarius ) „Third of Europe“ Zsombor Pünkösti (Hungary), MB1 Blue-winged Siva (Siva cyanouroptera ) Mammals „Best of Europe” Kestutis Bybartas (Lithuania), MM4 Siberian Roe Deer (Capreolus pygargus ) Reconstructions/Scientific Models „Best of Europe“ Bo Wessman (Sweden), Zander (Sander lucioperca ) Collective Artists Division: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Table and Recommended Band Sizes the Table on the Left Is from the USGS Bird Banding Laboratory
    Species Table and Recommended Band Sizes The table on the left is from the USGS Bird Banding Laboratory. If there is more than one size listed then the first one is the preferred recommended size. The table on the right may be used to find the National Band & Tag Company butt-end band style that matches the federal band size you are looking for. This Size Chart should be used as a guide only! We cannot be responsible for incorrect sizes being ordered based on this chart. Please measure your bird’s leg for accurate sizing, if you are unsure we will gladly send samples. Common Federal Federal NB&T Inside Inside Name Band Size Size Size Dia. (IN) Dia. (MM) Abert's Towhee 1A, 2, 1D 0A None .078 1.98 Acadian Flycatcher 0A, 0 0 None .083 2.11 Acorn Woodpecker 2, 3 1 1242-3 .094 2.39 Adelaide's Warbler 0A, 0 1B None .109 2.77 Adelie Penguin 9 1P None .112 2.84 African Collared-Dove 3A 1A 1242-4 .125 3.17 African Penguin 9 1D None .138 3.50 African Silverbill 0, 1C, 1 2 1242-5 .156 3.96 Akekee 1B, 1C, 1 3 1242-6 .188 4.78 Akepa 0 3B None .203 5.16 Akiapolaau 1A 3A 1242-7 .219 5.56 Akikiki 0, 1C, 1 4 1242-8 .250 6.35 Akohekohe 1A 4S 1242-8 .250 6.35 Alaska Marbled Murrelet 3B, 3 4A None .281 7.14 Alder Flycatcher 0, 0A 4AS None .281 7.14 Aleutian Canada Goose 7B 5 1242-10 .313 7.95 Aleutian Tern 2, 1A, 1D 5A None .344 8.73 Allen's Hummingbird X 6 1242-12 .375 9.53 Altamira Oriole 3 7A 1242-14 .438 11.13 American Avocet 4, 4A 7AS 1242-14 .438 11.13 American Bittern M: 7A F: 6 7 1242-16 .500 12.70 American Black Duck 7A 7B None .531 13.49 American
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Wintering Eurasian Woodcock in Western Europe
    Survey of Wintering Eurasian Woodcock in Western Europe DAVID GONÇALVES,1 CIBIO-InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4485-661 Vairão, Portugal and Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, R. Campo Alegre s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal TIAGO M. RODRIGUES, Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, R . Campo Alegre s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal and Direção Regional dos Recursos Florestais, Rua do Contador, 23, 9500-050 Ponta Delgada, Portugal PAOLO PENNACCHINI, Féderation des Associations Nationales des Bécassiers du Palearctique Occidental (FANBPO), Via Fausto Vagnetti 12, 52031 Anghiari, Italy JEAN-PIERRE LEPETIT, Club National des Bécassiers (CNB), 3 , Allée des chénes, 87220 Feytiat, France LARRY TAAFFE, The National Woodcock Association of Ireland (NWAOI), Effoldstown House, Lusk, Co. Dublin, Ireland MARCO TUTI, Beccacciai d’Italia (BDI), C lemente Rebora 14 - 73100 Lecce, Italy BRUNO MEUNIER, Club National des Bécassiers (CNB), 105, Rue Louis Pergaud, Villeneuve, 16430 Champniers, France JEAN-PIERRE CAMPANA,2 Club National des Bécassiers (CNB), 8 , Impasse des Bois, La Granje À Robin, 17770 Aumagne, France GIANLUIGI GREGORI, Club della Beccaccia (CDB), L oc. Morani di sotto, 22 – 61040 Mercatello sul Metauro (PU), Italy ALBERTO PELLEGRINI, Club della Beccaccia (CDB), L oc. Morani di sotto, 22 – 61040 Mercatello sul Metauro (PU), Italy GIUSEPPE RAHO, Beccacciai d’Italia (BDI), Clemente Rebora 14 - 73100 Lecce, Italy PAUL DUCHEIN, Association Suisse des Bécassiers (ASB), P lanafaye 118, CH - 1752 Villars sur Glâne, Switzerland COLIN TROTMAN, Welsh Woodcock Club (WWC), Department of Adult Continuing Education (DACE), K eir Hardie Building, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, Wales, UK MIGUEL MINONDO, Club de Cazadores de Becada (CCB), A venida Schulz 8, 4°Dcha.
    [Show full text]