Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction NOTES Introduction 1. Cf. Daniel Szechi and David Hayton's essay, :John Bull's Other Kingdoms', in Clyve Jones (ed.), Britain in the First Age of Party 1680-1750 (London and Ronceverte, 1987). 2. For an examination ofJacobitism in these terms, see Paul Monod,jacobitism and the English People (Cambridge, 1989) and Daniel Szechi, Thejacobites (Manchester, 1994). 3. Murray G. H. Pittock, The Myth ofthejacobite Clans (Edinburgh, 1995), p. 25. 4. John Kenyon, The History Men (London, 1983), p. 155 and passim. 5. Cited in Pittock, Myth, p. 10. 6. Paul Langford, A Polite and Commercial People (Oxford, 1989), p. 197; the phrase is Jeremy Black's. 7. A. D. Innes, A History of the British Nation From the Earliest Times to the Present Day (London and Edinburgh, 1912), p. 601. 8. Cf. Murray G. H. Pittock, The Invention ofScotland (London and New York, 1991 ), pp. 120 ff. 9. For a recent discussion ofEpiscopalian Nonjurors and their impact on Tractarianism, see Peter Nockles, '"Our Brethren of the North": The Scottish Episcopal Church and the Oxford Movement', journal ofEcclesiastical History (1996), 655-82. 10. Cf. Sir Charles Petrie, 'If: a Jacobite Fantasy', which first appeared in The J#ekly J#stminster for 30 January 1926, and thereafter in The jacobite Movement: the Last Phase, revised edn (London, 1950). 11. Eveline Cruickshanks, writing in Romney Sedgwick (ed.), The History ofParliament: the House ofCommons 1715-1754, 2 vols. (London, 1970), I: 62-78. 12. Cf. Ian Christie, 'The Tory Party,Jacobitism and the 'Forty-Five: A Note', Historical journal, 30:4 (1987), 921-31. 13. Cf. E. P. Thompson, WhigsandHunters(Harmondsworth, 1975). 14. J. G. A. Pocock, 'British History: A Plea for a New Subject', journal ofModern History, 47:4 (1975), 601-21; 'The Limits and Divisions ofBritish History: In Search of an Un­ known Subject', American Historical Review, 87 (1982), 311-36. 15. Further details ofMonod's work are to be found in his 1985 Yale Ph.D. thesis, 'For the King to Enjoy his Own Again'. 16. Cf. also Clark's essay, 'On Moving the Middle Ground: the Significance of Jacobitism in Historical Studies' in Eveline Cruickshanks and Jeremy Black (eds.), Thejacobite Challenge (Edinburgh, 1988). 17. Among them The Invention ofScotland(1991), by the present author. 18. Cf. Elizabeth Carmichael, :J acobitism in the Scottish Commission ofthe Peace, 1707- 1760', Scottish Historical Review, 58 ( 1979), 58-69. 19. Daniel Szechi, 'Mythhistory versus History: the Fading of the Revolution of 1688', Historical]ournal, 33:1 (1990), 143-54 (143). 20. Cf. in particular Bob Woosnam-Savage's 1995 Glasgow Museums exhibition. 138 Notes 139 1 A Foreign King and a Patriot Queen 1. Keith Brown, Kingdom or Province? Scotland and the Regal Union, 1603-1715 (Basingstoke, 1992), p. 80; Keith Brown, 'The vanishing emperor: British kingship and its decline, 1603-1707', in Roger A. Mason (ed.), Scots and Britons (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 58-87 (87). 2. Brown in Mason, Scots and Britons, p. 86. 3. Michael Lynch, Scotland: A New History (London, 1991 ), p. 288. 4. Sir Charles Petrie, The jacobite Movement: the First Phase, revised edn (London, 1948), p.226. 5. Brown, 'Vanishing emperor', in Mason, Scots and Britons, p. 87. 6. J. G. A. Pocock, 'Two kingdoms and three histories? Political thought in British con­ texts', in Mason, Scots and Britons, pp. 293-312 (307). 7. Allan Macinnes, Clanship, Commerce and the House ofStuart 1603-1788 (East Linton, 1996), pp. 79, 139, 140. 8. Ibid., pp. 139, 191. 9. A. H. Dodd, Studies in Stuart Wales, 2nd edn (Cardiff, 1971 (1952)), pp. 1, 19, 33-4. 10. Cf. ibid., and Murray G. H. Pittock, Inventing and Resisting Britain (London: Macmillan, 1997), p. 15. 11. Cf. Pittock, Inventing, pp. 10-11. 12. J. G. Simms, jacobite Ireland(London, 1969), pp. 1, 3, 8; S. J. Connolly, Religion, Law and Power: The Making ofProtestant Ireland 1660-1760(0xford, 1992), pp. 14-15, 19, 21,23,32. 13. Simms, jacobite Ireland, pp. 25, 32. 14. J. Kenyon and J. Miller in Eveline Cruickshanks (ed.), By Force or by Default? (Edinburgh, 1989), pp. 1-27; cf. Petrie, jacobite Movement, p. 73. 15. W. H. Murray,RobRoy(Edinburgh, 1993) (1982)),p. 84;JohnMillerJamesii,2ndedn (London, 1989), pp. 190ff. 16. Philip Aubrey, The Defeat of james Stuart's Armada 1692 (Leicester, 1979), p. 22; Magnus Linklater and Christian Hesketh, For King and Conscience :james Graham of Claverhouse, Viscount Dundee (London, 1989), p. 144; Cruickshanks, By Force, pp.28-43. 17. Cruickshanks, By Force, p. 32. 18. Aubrey, Defeat, p. 23. 19. Linklater and Hesketh, For King, pp. 147-9. 20. Cruickshanks, By Force, p. ii. 21. Murray G. H. Pittock, Poetry and jacobite Politics in Eighteenth- Century Britain and Ire­ land (Cambridge, 1994), Ch. 1. 22. Eveline Cruickshanks, 'Attempts to Restore the Stuarts, 1689-96', in Eveline Cruickshanks and Edward Corp (eds.), The Stuart Court in Exile and thejacobites (Lon­ don and Rio Grande, 1995), pp. 1-13 (1-2); cf.Letters ofGeorge Lockhart ofCarnwath, ed. Daniel Szechi (Edinburgh: Scottish History Society, 1989). 23. Pittock, Poetry, Ch. 5. 24. Tim Harris, 'London Crowds and the Revolution of 1688', in Cruickshanks,ByForce, pp. 44-64 (58). 25. Daniel Szechi, 'Mythhistory versus History: The Fading of the Revolution of 1688', Historical]ournal, 33:1 (1990), 143-54 (150). 26. Cf. Chris Fitter, 'Henry Vaughan's Landscapes of Military Occupation', in Essays in Criticism (1992), pp. 123-47 and james Turner, The Politics of Landscape (Oxford, 1979). 27. Paul Monod, 'Pierre's White Hat', in Cruickshanks,By Force, pp. 159-89 (160). 28. Charles Dalton, The Scots Army 1661-1688 With Memoirs ofthe Commanders in Chief, 2 parts (London and Edinburgh, 1909), p. xxvii. 140 Notes 29. Linklater and Hesketh, For King, pp. 148-51; Cruickshanks,By Force, pp. 28-43 (32). 30. Aubrey, Defeat, pp. 33-4; Anon., An Account ofthe Proceedings ofthe Meeting ofthe Es­ tates in Scotland (London, 1689), p. 1. 31. Anon., A Letter to a Member of The Convention ofStates in Scotland (Edinburgh, 1689), pp.6-7. 32. Bruce Lenman, 'The Scottish Nobility and the Revolution of 1688-1690', in Robert Beddard (ed.), The Revolutions of1688: The Andrew Browning Lectures 1988 (Oxford, 1991), pp. 137-61 (143, 153, 156). 33. Linklater and Hesketh, For King, pp. 152-65. For a discussion of Philp's poem, see Pittock, Poetry, Ch. 1. 34. Aubrey, Defeat, pp. 33-4; Daniel Szechi, Thejacobites (Manchester, 1994), p. 43. 35. Francis Godwin James, Ireland in the Empire 1688-1770 (Cambridge, MA, 1983), p.15. 36. Simms ,jacobite Ireland, p. 80. 3 7. Raymond Gillespie, 'The Irish Protestants and James II', Irish Historical Studies, XXVIII:10 (1992), 124-33 (131). 38. Letters ofjohn Grahame ofClaverhouse Viscount ofDundee with Illustrative Documents, ed. George Smythe (Edinburgh: Bannatyne Club, 1843), pp. 35-7. 39. Szechi, jacobites, p. 43. 40. Letters .. Dundee, pp. 38-41; Macinnes, Clanship, pp. 182n, 190. 41. Linklater and Hesketh, For King, pp. 178-9, 190. 42. Letters . .. Dundee, p. 48. 43. Ibid., p. 79. 44. Bruce Lenman, The jacobite Cause (Glasgow, 1986), p. 24; Letters . .. Dundee, pp ..67, 70, 78. 45. Lenman, jacobite Cause, p. 27. 46. Cf. Aubrey, Defeat, p. 46. 4 7. Memoirs of Sir Ewan Cameron of Locheil~ ed. Bindon Blood and James MacKnight (Edinburgh: Abbotsford Club, 1842), pp. 294 ff. 48. Petrie jacobite Movement, p. 84. 49. Aubrey, Defeat, p. 57. 50. Szechi, jacobites, p. 49; Simms, jacobite Ireland, p. 242; Frank McLynn, Thejacobites (London, 1985), pp. 15-18. 51. Szechi ,jacobites, p. 50. 52. Connolly, Religion, pp. 147 ff. 53. Simms, jacobite Ireland, pp. 242, 252-3, 258, 260-2, 263-4, 267. 54. John Childs, 'The Abortive Invasion of 1692', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. 61-72 (68-9). 55. Aubrey,Defeat, p. 78. 56. Childs, 'Abortive Invasion', p. 66. 57. Szechi,]acobites, p. 55. 58. Aubrey, Defeat, pp. 116, 128. 59. Cruickshanks, 'Attempts', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. 1-13 (4). 60. Aubrey,Defeat, pp. 74, 87. 61. Petrie, jacobite Movement, p. 74. 62. Edward Corp, 'Introduction', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. ix-xxiv (xiv-xv). 63. Nathalie Genet-Rouffiac, jacobites in Paris and Saint-Germain-en-Laye', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. 15-38 (18). 64. Corp, 'Introduction', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. xvii, xx. 65. Ibid., pp. xx, xxi. 66. Rouffiac, in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, p. 27. 67. Ibid., pp. 34-5,38. 68. Ibid., p. 33. Notes 141 69. Eveline Cruickshanks, 'Introduction', in Cruickshanks (ed.),Ideology and Conspiracy: Aspects of]acobitism, 1689-1759 (Edinburgh, 1982), pp. 1-14 (5-6). 70. Daniel Szechi, 'The Jacobite Revolution Settlement', English Historical Review (1993), 610-28 (624). 71. Paul Hopkins, 'Sham Plots and Real Plots in the 1690s', in Cruickshanks, Ideology, pp. 89-110 (89). 72. Cf. Szechi ]acobites, p. xiv. 73. Ibid., p. 56. 74. Cruickshanks, 'Introduction', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. 1-13 (7-10). 75. Petrie]acobiteMovement,p.112. 76. Szechi ,]acobites, p. xv. 7 7. H. T. Dickinson, 'TheJacobite Challenge', in Michael Lynch {ed.), ]acobitism and the '45(London, 1995), pp. 7-22 (11-13). 78. Anon., 'How the Risings of 1715 and 1745 affected Kincardineshire', Aberdeen]our­ nal: Notes and Queries, I (1908), 83-4 (84). 79. Murray G. H. Pittock, The Myth ofthe]acobite Clans(Edinburgh, 1995), p. 47; also see Jean McCann, 'The Organisation of the Jacobite Army, 1745-46', unpublished Ph.D. thesis (University of Edinburgh, 1963), pp. 137, 146, 147. 80. Aberdeen]ournal: Notes and Qyeries, II {1909), p. 146. 81. Szechi,]acobites, p. 67; Macinnes, Clanship, pp. 174, 176.
Recommended publications
  • Les Rois Thaumaturges
    Les Rois Tha uma turg es . Étud e su rle Cara ct Ère SURNATUREL At TRIBUE A LA PUISSANCE ROYALE Par ti cu li er eme nt en Fran ce et en Angl e - te rre . By Marc Bloch, Professeur a I’Universite de Strasbourg. En Depot: Librairie Istra, Maison d’Edition, Strasbourg, 15, rue des Juifs, Paris, 57, rue de Richelieu. Humphrey Milford: Oxford University Press, 1924. Professor Bloch has written a most exhaustive and erudite study of the “divinity that doth hedge a king.” As he states, the origins of the conception of mystic powers possessed by royal persons are lost in the obscurity attendant upon the beginnings of most human institutions. Certain it is that from the earliest periods down to a comparatively few centuries ago certain superhuman attributes were ascribed to those hereditary rulers who reigned by divine right. Because the supposed power of healing by the royal touch or other means figured among the origin of the tradition. He states that these, we must by no means allow ourselves to Henry i was most anxious to conciliate his think that the European or English kings whose English subjects. He married an English wife thaumaturgic properties are the special object and was anxious to attach his dynasty in every of study by Professor Bloch were considered possible way to that of the English kings before either by themselves or their subjects in the the Conquest. The most ancient narratives that light of mere sorcerers. Their mystical functions tell of the miraculous cures wrought by Edward were merely an appanage of their office, the the Confessor were written during the reign essential duties of which were to rule their of Henry i, and the official interpretation of the people, administer justice and conduct their cures brought about by the royal touch of affairs in war and peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Dr. Éamonn Ó Ciardha Senior Lecturer School of English, History and Politics Room MI208 Aberfoyle House Magee Campus University of Ulster Northland Road Derry/Londonderry BT 48 7JL Tel.: 02871-375257 E.Mail: [email protected] Education: Ph.D., 1992-98 (Clare Hall, Cambridge University). 'A Fatal Attachment: Ireland and the Jacobite cause 1684-1766'. Supervisor: Dr. B. I. Bradshaw [Queens' College Cambridge] M.A., 1989-91 (University College Dublin). “Buachaillí an tsléibhe agus bodaigh gan chéille” [‘Mountain boys and senseless churls’], Woodkerne, Tories and Rapparees in Ulster and North Connaught in the Seventeenth Century'. Supervisor: J.I. Mc Guire B.A., 1986-89 (University College Dublin). History and Irish Appointments: Lecturer, School of English, History and Politics, University of Ulster (Oct 2005-) Program Coordinator and Director of Undergraduate Studies, Keough Institute for Irish Studies, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, USA, (Aug 2004-Jun 2005) IRCHSS (Government of Ireland) Post-Doctoral Fellow, Department of Modern History, Trinity College Dublin. (Oct 2002-Oct 2004) Visiting Adjunct Professor, Keough Institute of Irish Studies, University of Notre Dame and Assistant Professional Specialist in University Libraries, University of Notre Dame (Aug, 2001-Jul 2002) Visiting Professor of Irish Studies, St. Michael’s College, University of Toronto. (Sept, 2000-Dec 2000) Researcher for the Royal Irish Academy-sponsored Dictionary of Irish Biography (Nov 1997-Nov 1999), researching and writing articles for the forthcoming Dictionary of Irish Biography, 9 vols (Cambridge, 2009) Research assistant, University of Aberdeen, Faculty of Modern History. (Oct 1996- Oct 1997) Bibliographer, Bibliography of British History, under the auspices of the Royal Historical Society and Cambridge University.
    [Show full text]
  • Maurice-Quentin De La Tour
    Neil Jeffares, Maurice-Quentin de La Tour Saint-Quentin 5.IX.1704–16/17.II.1788 This Essay is central to the La Tour fascicles in the online Dictionary which IV. CRITICAL FORTUNE 38 are indexed and introduced here. The work catalogue is divided into the IV.1 The vogue for pastel 38 following sections: IV.2 Responses to La Tour at the salons 38 • Part I: Autoportraits IV.3 Contemporary reputation 39 • Part II: Named sitters A–D IV.4 Posthumous reputation 39 • Part III: Named sitters E–L IV.5 Prices since 1800 42 • General references etc. 43 Part IV: Named sitters M–Q • Part V: Named sitters R–Z AURICE-QUENTIN DE LA TOUR was the most • Part VI: Unidentified sitters important pastellist of the eighteenth century. Follow the hyperlinks for other parts of this work available online: M Matisse bracketed him with Rembrandt among • Chronological table of documents relating to La Tour portraitists.1 “Célèbre par son talent & par son esprit”2 – • Contemporary biographies of La Tour known as an eccentric and wit as well as a genius, La Tour • Tropes in La Tour biographies had a keen sense of the importance of the great artist in • Besnard & Wildenstein concordance society which would shock no one today. But in terms of • Genealogy sheer technical bravura, it is difficult to envisage anything to match the enormous pastels of the président de Rieux J.46.2722 Contents of this essay or of Mme de Pompadour J.46.2541.3 The former, exhibited in the Salon of 1741, stunned the critics with its achievement: 3 I.
    [Show full text]
  • French Travellers to Scotland, 1780-1830
    French Travellers to Scotland, 1780-1830: An Analysis of Some Travel Journals. Elizabeth Anne McFarlane Submitted according to regulations of University of Stirling January 2015 Abstract. This study examines the value of travellers’ written records of their trips with specific reference to the journals of five French travellers who visited Scotland between 1780 and 1830. The thesis argues that they contain material which demonstrates the merit of journals as historical documents. The themes chosen for scrutiny, life in the rural areas, agriculture, industry, transport and towns, are examined and assessed across the journals and against the social, economic and literary scene in France and Scotland. Through the evidence presented in the journals, the thesis explores aspects of the tourist experience of the Enlightenment and post - Enlightenment periods. The viewpoint of knowledgeable French Anglophiles and their receptiveness to Scottish influences, grants a perspective of the position of France in the economic, social and power structure of Europe and the New World vis-à-vis Scotland. The thesis adopts a narrow, focussed analysis of the journals which is compared and contrasted to a broad brush approach adopted in other studies. ii Dedication. For Angus, Mhairi and Brent, who are all scientists. iii Acknowledgements. I would like to thank my husband, Angus, and my daughter, Mhairi, for all the support over the many years it has taken to complete this thesis. I would like to mention in particular the help Angus gave me in the layout of the maps and the table. I would like to express my appreciation for the patience and perseverance of my supervisors and second supervisors over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Body Royal Holloway, University of London 2-‐4 April
    The Royal Body Royal Holloway, University of London 2-4 April 2012 PROGRAMME Monday 2nd April 8.45-9.15: Registration and coffee 9.30-9.35: Introductions 9.35-10.45: Session 1 Plenary Lecture Philip Mansel [Chair: Maria Hayward, University of Southampton] Dressed to Rule: Dress and Monarchy from Louis XIV to Elizabeth II 10.45-11.10: Coffee 11.10-12.10: Session 2 Panel 2A: The physical body of queens: 17th and 18th century France and Sardinia [Chair: John MCCormaCk] Pascale Mormiche, l’Université de Cergy Pontoise PrinCesses and PreGnant Queens at the Court of Versailles in the seventeenth and eiGhteenth Centuries Federica Contu, University of Studies of Cagliari ReasoninG about the politiCal and the spiritual funCtion of the body. The case of Marie Clotilde of FranCe Queen of Sardinia. Panel 2B: The Effigial Body [Chair to be Confirmed] Lynsey McCulloch, Anglia Ruskin University The effiGial body: readinG a reliC of early modern monarchy Kosana Jovanovic, University of Rijeka, Croatia The Portable EffiGies Role in the Queens Funeral Ceremonies and Their ConneCtion with the KinG’s Two Bodies Theory. Panel 2C: Representing the Body: The case of Queen Victoria and King George V and VI [Chair to be Confirmed] Tracy Jane Anderson, University of Sussex ReGina Imperatrix: The royal and imperial bodies of Queen ViCtoria Ina Zweiniger-Bargielowska, University of Illinois (Chicago) Royal Death and LivinG Memorials: The Commemoration of George V and George VI Panel 2D: Memory and Commemoration: The Case of Henry VII [Chair to be Confimed] Christine Merie Fox, Royal Holloway, University of London Henry VII preparation for his memorial at Westminster Abbey Mark R.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851
    Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 Rosemary Hill Queen Mary, University of London Submitted for the degree of PhD March 2011 1 I confirm that the work presented in this thesis and submitted for the degree of PhD is my own. Rosemary Hill 2 Abstract The thesis concentrates on the work of fourteen antiquaries active in the period from the French Revolution to the Great Exhibition in England, Scotland and France. I have used a combination of the antiquaries’ published works, which cover, among other subjects, architecture, topography, costume history, Shakespeare and the history of furniture, alongside their private papers to develop an account of that lived engagement with the past which characterised the romantic period. It ends with the growing professionalistion and specialisation of historical studies in the mid-nineteenth century which left little room for the self-generating, essentially romantic antiquarian enterprise. In so far as this subject has been considered at all it has been in the context of what has come to be called ‘the invention of tradition’. It is true that the romantic engagement with history as narrative led to some elaboration of the facts, while the newness of the enterprise laid it open to mistakes. I have not ignored this. The restoration of the Bayeux Tapestry, the forged tartans of the Sobieski Stuarts and the creation of Shakespeare’s Birthplace are all considered. Overall, however, I have been concerned not to debunk but as it were to ‘rebunk’, to see the antiquaries in their historical context and, as far as possible, in their own terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Edward Stuart
    Études écossaises 10 | 2005 La Réputation Charles Edward Stuart Murray G. H. Pittock Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/etudesecossaises/149 DOI: 10.4000/etudesecossaises.149 ISSN: 1969-6337 Publisher UGA Éditions/Université Grenoble Alpes Printed version Date of publication: 31 March 2005 Number of pages: 57-71 ISBN: 2-84310-061-5 ISSN: 1240-1439 Electronic reference Murray G. H. Pittock, “Charles Edward Stuart”, Études écossaises [Online], 10 | 2005, Online since 31 March 2005, connection on 21 September 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ etudesecossaises/149 ; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/etudesecossaises.149 © Études écossaises Murray G.H. Pittock Charles Edward Stuart In April 1746, as events at Culloden drifted away from the Jacobites, Lord Elcho called on his leader Charles to charge forward and save the day. When he failed to do so, and instead left the field, Elcho termed him « an Italian coward and a scoundrel» (Scott, p. 213; Ewald, 1875, II, p. 27-33), sometimes popularized as «There you go, you cowardly Italian». Elcho’s squadron of Lifeguard cavalry were one of the Jacobite army’s few crack units: their wealthy and arrogant commander had already loaned Charles Edward 1500 guineas, a loan that was never repaid: to Charles it was a wager on success, to Elcho a commercial transaction, as Frank McLynn (1988, p. 141) has argued. In April 1746, as events at Culloden drifted away from the Jacobites, a cornet in the Horse Guards noted that the Prince wanted to charge forward and save the day. Colonel O’Sullivan ordered Colonel O’Shea of Fitzjames’s (whose name did not appear in the 1984 Muster Roll) to take Charles to safety (Livingstone, 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Representations of Early Modern German Women Book Collectors (1650-1780)
    CURATING THE COLLECTOR: EXPLORING REPRESENTATIONS OF EARLY MODERN GERMAN WOMEN BOOK COLLECTORS (1650-1780) BY KATHLEEN MARIE SMITH DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in German in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2012 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Professor Mara R. Wade, Chair Associate Professor Laurie Johnson Associate Professor Stephanie Hilger Professor Carl Niekerk Professor Tom D. Kilton, Emeritus ABSTRACT This dissertation examines representations of book collecting by German women in the early modern period in order to explore the role of gender in this activity. Portrayals of book collectors in the modern and early modern eras offer examples of how this identity is constructed, particularly in the underlying assumptions and expectations that determine who is defined as a book collector and what criteria are used to shape that decision. In the case of four early modern women--Elisabeth Sophie Marie of Braunschweig-Lüneburg (1683-1767); Elisabeth Ernestine Antonie of Sachsen-Meiningen (1681-1766); Caroline of Ansbach (1683- 1737); and Wilhelmine of Bayreuth (1709-1758)--the act of collecting is depicted as essential to their social status and an integral part of their lives. Finally, in an in-depth case study of an early modern German woman who was a book collector, Sophie of Hanover (1630-1714), this study analyzes how she represented her collecting activities and textual interaction as well as how she is represented in other texts. The way in which these early modern German women were represented and represented themselves as collectors reveals a great deal about the position of women within wider networks concerning the exchange of texts and information.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephano Torelli's “Coronation Portrait of Catherine II”: Crowns As a Visual Formula of the Lands of the Russian Empire
    UDC 75.04 Вестник СПбГУ. Искусствоведение. 2020. Т. 10. Вып. 2 Stephano Torelli’s “Coronation Portrait of Catherine II”: Crowns as a Visual Formula of the Lands of the Russian Empire* E. A. Skvortcova Saint Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation For citation: Skvortcova, Ekaterina. “Stephano Torelli’s ‘Coronation Portrait of Catherine II’: Crowns as a Visual Formula of the Lands of the Russian Empire”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Arts 10, no. 2 (2020): 274–299. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu15.2020.206 The “Coronation portrait of Catherine II” by Stephano Torelli introduces a new type of ico- nography of the Russian Empress in which she appears as a bearer of multiple (i. e. four) crowns. Whereas originally such a portrait type in European art served as a representation of the several titles of the ruler and correspondent lands joined in a personal union, it became a representation of the titles of Catherine II as the Russian Empress and tsarina of the conquered tsarstva of Kazan, Astrakhan and Siberia. The theme of titles and lands of the Empire had al- ready developed in 18th-century Russia in other forms (allegorical figures, coats-of-arms) and visual media (decorative painting and sculpture). Circa 10 examples collected here for the first time are set side by side with their European counterparts. Three types of representations of native and conquered territories emerged in which the very choice of particular titles and the place of their symbolic representation in composition accentuated different aspects in the con- cept of the Russian Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Silver & Applied Arts (496) Lot
    Scottish Silver & Applied Arts (496) Wed, 16th Aug 2017, Edinburgh Lot 428 Estimate: £5000 - £7000 + Fees A FINE JACOBITE REVIVAL CARVED WOOD FRAME MID 19TH CENTURY the engraving showing the return of Bonnie Prince Charlie to Edinburgh after the Battle of Prestonpans, engraved by Francis Bacon after the painting by Thomas Duncan, signed in the margin, the heavily carved frame with a cresting of a plumed crown above a central figure of Charles Edward on horseback, draped with colours, canon, shields and including the dress targe presented to Prince Charles Edward Stuart by James, 3rd Duke of Perth, the corners with further clusters of arms and armour, the engraving flanked by bold Highland figures holding flags and standing on scrolls with carved crests in shields for the MacPhersons to the left and MacDonald to the right, the lower section with carved central Royal Standard flanked by oval portrait of Prince Charles Edward Stuart, further trophies of arms and various Scottish musical instruments Dimensions: 112 x 128cm (overall) Provenance: Formerly at Glentruim, with the MacPherson family by descent Note: Although the exact provenance and history of this commission is unknown, its long connection with the MacPherson family and the obvious iconography tells an interesting and important story. The frame dates firmly to the Jacobite/ Highland revival period when the turn in Scots' attitudes to being Scots meant that all parts of a family's history were re-evaluated and relics were not only brought out to display but new 'heritage' was created. It would appear that this frame falls into both camps.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland and Britain Connections
    Poland and Britain Connections http://www.collaborativelearning.org/britainpoland.pdf Poland and Britain - Connections This set of activities is currently developing as a response to racist behaviour towards Polish new arrivals in classrooms in rural areas where the presence of other ethnic groups is new and ignorance is shared by adults and children. The activities are designed to acquaint pupils with the connections that have been taking place since the twelfth century or earlier when Norman knights went crusading in Poland up to the time when after the invasions of Poland in 1939 many Polish soldiers, sailors and airmen came to Britain and made a significant contribution to the war effort. With help of colleagues in Poland I hope we can bring the history closer to the present, but I sense that we will be looking at historical sources which are still very controversial. Currently we have two (maybe three) activities in the pipeline: 1. A 'sort out the clues' activity to complete a timeline introducing events from Polish history (bottom of timeline) and events from joint Great Britain/Polish history (top of timeline). 2. An information/transformations activity introducing a class set and more of people, events, artefacts for sharing and researching. 3. A timeline and mapping activity along the lines of our Anglo Saxon dates activity where small groups study different periods of Polish history to research and present to the rest of the class. I must emphasise at this stage that the activities are tentative and we welcome your comments and suggestions. If you have Polish students or teachers in your school please ask them to help us.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpreting the King's Touch
    James Blair Historical Review Volume 9 Issue 1 James Blair Historical Review, Volume Article 2 9, Issue 1 2019 Interpreting the King’s Touch: Authority and Accessibility in the Reign of Charles II Audrey Spensley Princeton University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/jbhr Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Spensley, Audrey (2019) "Interpreting the King’s Touch: Authority and Accessibility in the Reign of Charles II," James Blair Historical Review: Vol. 9 : Iss. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/jbhr/vol9/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in James Blair Historical Review by an authorized editor of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Spensley: Charles II and the King's Touch Interpreting the King’s Touch: Authority and Accessibility in the Reign of Charles II Audrey Spensley “’Tis call’d the evil:/ A most miraculous work in this good king;/ Which often, since my here-remain in England, I have seen him do./ How he solicits heaven,/ Himself best knows: but strangely- visited people, /All swoln and ulcerous, pitiful to the eye, /The mere despair of surgery, he cures,/ Hanging a golden stamp about their necks,/ Put on with holy prayers: and ‘tis spoken, To the succeeding royalty he leaves/ The healing benediction.”1 The above passage from Shakespeare’s Macbeth is typically omitted from readings of the play; it was
    [Show full text]