Introduction
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
NOTES Introduction 1. Cf. Daniel Szechi and David Hayton's essay, :John Bull's Other Kingdoms', in Clyve Jones (ed.), Britain in the First Age of Party 1680-1750 (London and Ronceverte, 1987). 2. For an examination ofJacobitism in these terms, see Paul Monod,jacobitism and the English People (Cambridge, 1989) and Daniel Szechi, Thejacobites (Manchester, 1994). 3. Murray G. H. Pittock, The Myth ofthejacobite Clans (Edinburgh, 1995), p. 25. 4. John Kenyon, The History Men (London, 1983), p. 155 and passim. 5. Cited in Pittock, Myth, p. 10. 6. Paul Langford, A Polite and Commercial People (Oxford, 1989), p. 197; the phrase is Jeremy Black's. 7. A. D. Innes, A History of the British Nation From the Earliest Times to the Present Day (London and Edinburgh, 1912), p. 601. 8. Cf. Murray G. H. Pittock, The Invention ofScotland (London and New York, 1991 ), pp. 120 ff. 9. For a recent discussion ofEpiscopalian Nonjurors and their impact on Tractarianism, see Peter Nockles, '"Our Brethren of the North": The Scottish Episcopal Church and the Oxford Movement', journal ofEcclesiastical History (1996), 655-82. 10. Cf. Sir Charles Petrie, 'If: a Jacobite Fantasy', which first appeared in The J#ekly J#stminster for 30 January 1926, and thereafter in The jacobite Movement: the Last Phase, revised edn (London, 1950). 11. Eveline Cruickshanks, writing in Romney Sedgwick (ed.), The History ofParliament: the House ofCommons 1715-1754, 2 vols. (London, 1970), I: 62-78. 12. Cf. Ian Christie, 'The Tory Party,Jacobitism and the 'Forty-Five: A Note', Historical journal, 30:4 (1987), 921-31. 13. Cf. E. P. Thompson, WhigsandHunters(Harmondsworth, 1975). 14. J. G. A. Pocock, 'British History: A Plea for a New Subject', journal ofModern History, 47:4 (1975), 601-21; 'The Limits and Divisions ofBritish History: In Search of an Un known Subject', American Historical Review, 87 (1982), 311-36. 15. Further details ofMonod's work are to be found in his 1985 Yale Ph.D. thesis, 'For the King to Enjoy his Own Again'. 16. Cf. also Clark's essay, 'On Moving the Middle Ground: the Significance of Jacobitism in Historical Studies' in Eveline Cruickshanks and Jeremy Black (eds.), Thejacobite Challenge (Edinburgh, 1988). 17. Among them The Invention ofScotland(1991), by the present author. 18. Cf. Elizabeth Carmichael, :J acobitism in the Scottish Commission ofthe Peace, 1707- 1760', Scottish Historical Review, 58 ( 1979), 58-69. 19. Daniel Szechi, 'Mythhistory versus History: the Fading of the Revolution of 1688', Historical]ournal, 33:1 (1990), 143-54 (143). 20. Cf. in particular Bob Woosnam-Savage's 1995 Glasgow Museums exhibition. 138 Notes 139 1 A Foreign King and a Patriot Queen 1. Keith Brown, Kingdom or Province? Scotland and the Regal Union, 1603-1715 (Basingstoke, 1992), p. 80; Keith Brown, 'The vanishing emperor: British kingship and its decline, 1603-1707', in Roger A. Mason (ed.), Scots and Britons (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 58-87 (87). 2. Brown in Mason, Scots and Britons, p. 86. 3. Michael Lynch, Scotland: A New History (London, 1991 ), p. 288. 4. Sir Charles Petrie, The jacobite Movement: the First Phase, revised edn (London, 1948), p.226. 5. Brown, 'Vanishing emperor', in Mason, Scots and Britons, p. 87. 6. J. G. A. Pocock, 'Two kingdoms and three histories? Political thought in British con texts', in Mason, Scots and Britons, pp. 293-312 (307). 7. Allan Macinnes, Clanship, Commerce and the House ofStuart 1603-1788 (East Linton, 1996), pp. 79, 139, 140. 8. Ibid., pp. 139, 191. 9. A. H. Dodd, Studies in Stuart Wales, 2nd edn (Cardiff, 1971 (1952)), pp. 1, 19, 33-4. 10. Cf. ibid., and Murray G. H. Pittock, Inventing and Resisting Britain (London: Macmillan, 1997), p. 15. 11. Cf. Pittock, Inventing, pp. 10-11. 12. J. G. Simms, jacobite Ireland(London, 1969), pp. 1, 3, 8; S. J. Connolly, Religion, Law and Power: The Making ofProtestant Ireland 1660-1760(0xford, 1992), pp. 14-15, 19, 21,23,32. 13. Simms, jacobite Ireland, pp. 25, 32. 14. J. Kenyon and J. Miller in Eveline Cruickshanks (ed.), By Force or by Default? (Edinburgh, 1989), pp. 1-27; cf. Petrie, jacobite Movement, p. 73. 15. W. H. Murray,RobRoy(Edinburgh, 1993) (1982)),p. 84;JohnMillerJamesii,2ndedn (London, 1989), pp. 190ff. 16. Philip Aubrey, The Defeat of james Stuart's Armada 1692 (Leicester, 1979), p. 22; Magnus Linklater and Christian Hesketh, For King and Conscience :james Graham of Claverhouse, Viscount Dundee (London, 1989), p. 144; Cruickshanks, By Force, pp.28-43. 17. Cruickshanks, By Force, p. 32. 18. Aubrey, Defeat, p. 23. 19. Linklater and Hesketh, For King, pp. 147-9. 20. Cruickshanks, By Force, p. ii. 21. Murray G. H. Pittock, Poetry and jacobite Politics in Eighteenth- Century Britain and Ire land (Cambridge, 1994), Ch. 1. 22. Eveline Cruickshanks, 'Attempts to Restore the Stuarts, 1689-96', in Eveline Cruickshanks and Edward Corp (eds.), The Stuart Court in Exile and thejacobites (Lon don and Rio Grande, 1995), pp. 1-13 (1-2); cf.Letters ofGeorge Lockhart ofCarnwath, ed. Daniel Szechi (Edinburgh: Scottish History Society, 1989). 23. Pittock, Poetry, Ch. 5. 24. Tim Harris, 'London Crowds and the Revolution of 1688', in Cruickshanks,ByForce, pp. 44-64 (58). 25. Daniel Szechi, 'Mythhistory versus History: The Fading of the Revolution of 1688', Historical]ournal, 33:1 (1990), 143-54 (150). 26. Cf. Chris Fitter, 'Henry Vaughan's Landscapes of Military Occupation', in Essays in Criticism (1992), pp. 123-47 and james Turner, The Politics of Landscape (Oxford, 1979). 27. Paul Monod, 'Pierre's White Hat', in Cruickshanks,By Force, pp. 159-89 (160). 28. Charles Dalton, The Scots Army 1661-1688 With Memoirs ofthe Commanders in Chief, 2 parts (London and Edinburgh, 1909), p. xxvii. 140 Notes 29. Linklater and Hesketh, For King, pp. 148-51; Cruickshanks,By Force, pp. 28-43 (32). 30. Aubrey, Defeat, pp. 33-4; Anon., An Account ofthe Proceedings ofthe Meeting ofthe Es tates in Scotland (London, 1689), p. 1. 31. Anon., A Letter to a Member of The Convention ofStates in Scotland (Edinburgh, 1689), pp.6-7. 32. Bruce Lenman, 'The Scottish Nobility and the Revolution of 1688-1690', in Robert Beddard (ed.), The Revolutions of1688: The Andrew Browning Lectures 1988 (Oxford, 1991), pp. 137-61 (143, 153, 156). 33. Linklater and Hesketh, For King, pp. 152-65. For a discussion of Philp's poem, see Pittock, Poetry, Ch. 1. 34. Aubrey, Defeat, pp. 33-4; Daniel Szechi, Thejacobites (Manchester, 1994), p. 43. 35. Francis Godwin James, Ireland in the Empire 1688-1770 (Cambridge, MA, 1983), p.15. 36. Simms ,jacobite Ireland, p. 80. 3 7. Raymond Gillespie, 'The Irish Protestants and James II', Irish Historical Studies, XXVIII:10 (1992), 124-33 (131). 38. Letters ofjohn Grahame ofClaverhouse Viscount ofDundee with Illustrative Documents, ed. George Smythe (Edinburgh: Bannatyne Club, 1843), pp. 35-7. 39. Szechi, jacobites, p. 43. 40. Letters .. Dundee, pp. 38-41; Macinnes, Clanship, pp. 182n, 190. 41. Linklater and Hesketh, For King, pp. 178-9, 190. 42. Letters . .. Dundee, p. 48. 43. Ibid., p. 79. 44. Bruce Lenman, The jacobite Cause (Glasgow, 1986), p. 24; Letters . .. Dundee, pp ..67, 70, 78. 45. Lenman, jacobite Cause, p. 27. 46. Cf. Aubrey, Defeat, p. 46. 4 7. Memoirs of Sir Ewan Cameron of Locheil~ ed. Bindon Blood and James MacKnight (Edinburgh: Abbotsford Club, 1842), pp. 294 ff. 48. Petrie jacobite Movement, p. 84. 49. Aubrey, Defeat, p. 57. 50. Szechi, jacobites, p. 49; Simms, jacobite Ireland, p. 242; Frank McLynn, Thejacobites (London, 1985), pp. 15-18. 51. Szechi ,jacobites, p. 50. 52. Connolly, Religion, pp. 147 ff. 53. Simms, jacobite Ireland, pp. 242, 252-3, 258, 260-2, 263-4, 267. 54. John Childs, 'The Abortive Invasion of 1692', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. 61-72 (68-9). 55. Aubrey,Defeat, p. 78. 56. Childs, 'Abortive Invasion', p. 66. 57. Szechi,]acobites, p. 55. 58. Aubrey, Defeat, pp. 116, 128. 59. Cruickshanks, 'Attempts', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. 1-13 (4). 60. Aubrey,Defeat, pp. 74, 87. 61. Petrie, jacobite Movement, p. 74. 62. Edward Corp, 'Introduction', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. ix-xxiv (xiv-xv). 63. Nathalie Genet-Rouffiac, jacobites in Paris and Saint-Germain-en-Laye', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. 15-38 (18). 64. Corp, 'Introduction', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. xvii, xx. 65. Ibid., pp. xx, xxi. 66. Rouffiac, in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, p. 27. 67. Ibid., pp. 34-5,38. 68. Ibid., p. 33. Notes 141 69. Eveline Cruickshanks, 'Introduction', in Cruickshanks (ed.),Ideology and Conspiracy: Aspects of]acobitism, 1689-1759 (Edinburgh, 1982), pp. 1-14 (5-6). 70. Daniel Szechi, 'The Jacobite Revolution Settlement', English Historical Review (1993), 610-28 (624). 71. Paul Hopkins, 'Sham Plots and Real Plots in the 1690s', in Cruickshanks, Ideology, pp. 89-110 (89). 72. Cf. Szechi ]acobites, p. xiv. 73. Ibid., p. 56. 74. Cruickshanks, 'Introduction', in Cruickshanks and Corp, Stuart Court, pp. 1-13 (7-10). 75. Petrie]acobiteMovement,p.112. 76. Szechi ,]acobites, p. xv. 7 7. H. T. Dickinson, 'TheJacobite Challenge', in Michael Lynch {ed.), ]acobitism and the '45(London, 1995), pp. 7-22 (11-13). 78. Anon., 'How the Risings of 1715 and 1745 affected Kincardineshire', Aberdeen]our nal: Notes and Queries, I (1908), 83-4 (84). 79. Murray G. H. Pittock, The Myth ofthe]acobite Clans(Edinburgh, 1995), p. 47; also see Jean McCann, 'The Organisation of the Jacobite Army, 1745-46', unpublished Ph.D. thesis (University of Edinburgh, 1963), pp. 137, 146, 147. 80. Aberdeen]ournal: Notes and Qyeries, II {1909), p. 146. 81. Szechi,]acobites, p. 67; Macinnes, Clanship, pp. 174, 176.