DOCSLIB.ORG

J.J1!Itm1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BR.OWDY AND N EIMAR.K AITOR.NEYS AT lAW TELECOPIER. FACSIMILE PATENT AND TRADEMARK CAUSES (CROUPS I. II. 8 IIIl SHERIDAN NEIMARK (202) 737-3528 SUITE 300 ROGER L BROWDY (202) 393-1012 419 SEVENTH STREET. N. W. ANNE M. KORN BAU TELEX. 248633 WASHINGTON. D. C. 20004 NORMAN J. LATKER SENIOR COUNSEL JEROME J. NORRIS- TELEPHONE (202)-628-5197 ALVIN BROWDY (·NOT ....OMITTEO IN D.C.) PATENT ....CENTS Of COUNSEL JOHN E. TARCZA IVER P. COOPER G. KEVIN TOWNSEND A. FRED STAROBIN 'IELEFAXCONIROLSHEET SENT TO: DATE SENT: SUBJECT: No. of pages (inc1uding this cover sheet): Sent by: _-J.J1!itM1 bTlce< Remarks: CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE This confidential facsimile message is intended only for the individual entity named above, and may contain information that is privileged and exempt [rom disclosure under applicable law. If you, the reader of this message, are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you should not copy this facsimile or distribute it to anyone other than the intended recipient. In addition, if you have received this telecopy in error please immediatelr notify us by telephone or telefax and retum the original message to us at the address above via the bnited States Posta Service. Finally, itit would not inconvenience you, we would appreciate it ifyou would first refax this message to the intended recipient. Thank.you. If this transmission is not well received, please advise us at ........... ~ .... .., .... ~......... 1" .... _, 01- ..,.., n~~~ " CUNTON RNO GORE BUI~O THEIR TECHNO~OGY TERM Po irj 81;./5 hq """ By Brett Berlin /~t G!C;~..&("Y-C312.. The list of earlij appointees reveals the vice president's hand and acommitment to acMon f the first round of technology ap­ .. pointees are an indication, President Bill Cliuton and Vice President Al I Gore may be succeeding in putting political "business as usual" to the test. This team could effectively tran­ scend agency boundaries, yielding a de­ gree of unity that will help federal and corporate technology. Taken as a group, the current ap­ pointees reveal some of the inner dynam­ ics of Clinton's strategy for managing the federal. science and technology enter­ prise. Three things particularly stand out . • The vice president is playing a sub­ stantial role in technology and competi­ tiveness matters, including recruitment of key personnel. • Senior White House economic and technology policy staff and relevant agency principals are being shaped into a Democratic candidates Bill Clinton and AI Gore visit a steel mill continued on page 24 during the 1992 campaign. continuedfrom page 23 CONSENSUS IN THE WHITE HOUSE pragmatic. consensus-driven team. • Early sub-cabinet appointments in Successful technology policy and the departments of Defense and Com­ action are completely dependent on the merce signal a commitment to visionary president's ability to create a working action, as opposed to political patronage. consensus. Clinton made progress in that direction by creating a White House tech­ nology policy team with three success­ THE GORE CONNECTION: oriented characteristics: consensus, mod­ ACTIVE ROLE FOR THE VICE PRESIOENT erate activism and effective outreach. Consensus is a hallmark of the Clin­ The vice president is clearly dedi­ ton leadership style. Particnlarly impor­ cated to recruiting major technology op­ tant in setting this tone will be National eratives. Economic Council Chairman Robert E. John Gibbons, former director of Rubin. Rubin's role as policy integrator is Congress' Office of Technology Assess­ expected to impact technology and com­ ment and a veteran of Oak Ridge Na­ petitiveness initiatives. tional Laboratory, was selected as assis­ When given Rubin's assignment, the tant to the president for science and direc­ typical White House powerbroker would DefenseSecretary LesAspin tor of the Office ofScience and Technol­ consolidate turf. But Rubin moved in the believes strongly in making ogy Policy. opposite direction, even to the point of defensetechnologies workin the Carol Browner, formerly a Gore aide sharing a staff group with the National commercial marketplace. and Florida environmental regulation Security Council to ensure closer coordi­ secretary, was chosen as administrator of nation. He will also rely on Gibbons' Of­ the Environmental Protection Agency. fice of Science and Technology Policy Former Cray Research Chairman concerning such issues. Petty infighting and CEO John Rollwagen, a Gore inti­ is obviously not part of Rubin's agenda. mate, was tapped to be deputy secretary The president has set a decidedly ofCommerce. moderate, though activist, tone. "This With the elimination of the Space team is not extremist in either direction." and Competitiveness Councils in the Of­ said Craig Fields, former Defense Ad­ fice of the Vice President and concentra­ vanced Research Projects Agency, or tion of all White House science and tech­ DARPA, chief and now CEO with Mi­ nology staff, Gore is expected to be a ma­ croelectronics and Computer Technology jor unifying force for cohesive technol­ Corp. Fields is a key technology adviser ogy policy. to the new administration. Rather than A system-wide team concept, with ideology, Fields said, this team stands out the vice president at point, becomes a for its "depth and breadth [of understand­ new template for technology and compet­ ing]. This team has a willingness to act." itiveness coordination. The team effort Laura d'Andrea Tyson, the new gives initiatives such as the embryonic chairwoman of the Council of Economic manufacturing technology program a Advisers, is known as a thoughtful advo­ chance ofrising above interagency turf. cate ofgovernment exercising an "appro­ "In the previous administration, the priate" role. She refers to herself as a lack of an effective consensus-forcing "cautious activist." She is expected to be mechanism in the White House often a stark contrast to her predecessor. One LaborSecretary RobertReich stood in the way of even simple propos­ economist familiar with Tyson said: "To mustpreparethe country to cope als," said Denise Michele, director of the extent that any of these [technology withthe changethattechnology Technology and Manufacturing Policy policy matters] are discussed, the [coun­ for the American Electronics Associa­ cil's] role will be to facilitate and encour­ brings to the workplace. tion. With Gore fully engaged and a con­ age, rather than to block action." sensus-driven senior team, "many bu­ Tyson can be expected to be a strong reaucratic impediments could simply supporter of key technology initiatives evaporate, and any problem will at least such as those in high-performance com­ be workable." puting, manufacturing technology and 24 TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER BUSINESS SPRING 1 (j(j~ materials. She advocates an active tech­ ACTION ATTHE FRONT LINES nology policy approach to both trade and internal competitiveness challenges such When Clinton took office, there was as defense conversion. immediate public concern that he would "Laura brings a special measure of not be able to attract the talent necessary creativity" to her responsibility for char­ to address technology competitiveness. acterizing the economy, according to The Department of Commerce, where the Skip Johns, fanner associate director of bulk of new initiatives will be imple­ the Office of Technology Assessment mented, was of particular concern. and now top aide to science adviser Gib­ According to a number of media re­ bons. By applying that creativity to her ports, Hewlett-Packard's John Young re­ understanding of the state of industry and fused the secretary position partly be­ the economy, Tyson is "a high detector of cause he did not believe that Commerce change with an open-rnindedness about could be turned into the lead agency re­ how one deals with change and gets to quired to accomplish many of the emerg­ goals," Johns said. ing initiatives. Clinton's selection of Gibbons to the While many applauded Ron senior technology position in the White Brown's managerial and consensus­ House emphasizes a commitment to ef­ building talents, questions were raised Commerce Secretary Ron Brown fective outreach in technology policy. about his ability to lead the department "The President wants to see more part­ into its new role. leadsa department that has been nership and wants to facilitate more out­ Enter John Rollwagen, the bright, given a much largerroletoplay side involvement," Johns said; And for energetic former chairman and CEO of in technology policy. that task, "when it comes to science and Cray Research Inc., as the person to be technology policy, John Gibbons would the Commerce deputy secretary. The pic­ be at the top of anyone's short list." ture at Commerce changed. Rollwagen is A top scientist in his own right, Gib­ a potentially potent combination of an ef­ bons spent the last 13 years building the fective manager and political power­ Office of Technology Assessment into a house, and an action-oriented technology bipartisan organization with a specialty in CEO who has been in the trenches fight­ reaching out to all sides of issues in order ing all of the battles higblighted in the to present Congress with non-ideological campaign, and probably hand-picked by policy options. During that tenure, Gib­ the vice president. bons demonstrated an ability to listen, This team gives Commerce its and to integrate highly diverse points of strength to become the major technology view. A key Gibbons strength is to ensure and competitiveness player, with near di­ the interests and view of the public are rect access to both the president and vice not overruled by the experts, even while president, strong support from the Con­ absorbing what the experts are saying, gress, and, via Rollwagen, the potential Johns said. for a well-tuned policy consensus with In his new role as the White House Tyson, Gibbons and Rubin. fulcrum for technology initiatives, Gib­ bons will reach outside of Washington and to agencies not traditionally involved DEFENSE INTO THE MAINSTREAM in technology.
Recommended publications
  • House State and Local Government Committee House Bill 195 – Women Veterans’ Day Sponsor Testimony 1 MAY 2019

    House State and Local Government Committee House Bill 195 – Women Veterans’ Day Sponsor Testimony 1 MAY 2019

    House State and Local Government Committee House Bill 195 – Women Veterans’ Day Sponsor Testimony 1 MAY 2019 Chair Perales, Vice Chair Hood, and members of the House Armed Services and Veterans Affairs Committee thank you for the opportunity to testify today regarding House Bill 195. And thank you to my joint sponsor, Assistant Majority Whip Lanese, for working with me on this important piece of legislation. While President Truman signed the Women’s Armed Services Integration Act in 1948, it would be 45-years before the Pentagon, under the direction of Defense Secretary Les Aspin, would lift the ban on women serving on combat aircraft and warships in 1993. It took time for Aspin’s directive to make an impact. It wasn’t until 1998 that female fighter pilots flew into combat for the first time as part of a four- day bombing campaign on Iraq and Kathleen McGrath became the first woman to command a Navy warship. In that same year, Heather Wilson—now Secretary of the Air Force—was elected to represent New Mexico’s First Congressional District, becoming the first female military veteran to complete a full term in Congress. It was a privilege of mine to intern for her. In 2005, Leigh Ann Hester, an Army National Guard soldier would become the first woman since the end of WWII to earn the Silver Star for her service after she outmaneuvered 50-insurgent fighters in Iraq, assaulting and clearing two trenches 8-years before Secretary Leon Panetta lifted the ban on women serving in combat altogether. This is not to say the progress women veterans have made have been limited to our most recent history.
  • ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7

    ("DSCC") Files This Complaint Seeking an Immediate Investigation by the 7

    COMPLAINT BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION CBHMISSIOAl INTRODUCTXON - 1 The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee ("DSCC") 7-_. J _j. c files this complaint seeking an immediate investigation by the 7 c; a > Federal Election Commission into the illegal spending A* practices of the National Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee (WRSCIt). As the public record shows, and an investigation will confirm, the NRSC and a series of ostensibly nonprofit, nonpartisan groups have undertaken a significant and sustained effort to funnel "soft money101 into federal elections in violation of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended or "the Act"), 2 U.S.C. 5s 431 et seq., and the Federal Election Commission (peFECt)Regulations, 11 C.F.R. 85 100.1 & sea. 'The term "aoft money" as ueed in this Complaint means funds,that would not be lawful for use in connection with any federal election (e.g., corporate or labor organization treasury funds, contributions in excess of the relevant contribution limit for federal elections). THE FACTS IN TBIS CABE On November 24, 1992, the state of Georgia held a unique runoff election for the office of United States Senator. Georgia law provided for a runoff if no candidate in the regularly scheduled November 3 general election received in excess of 50 percent of the vote. The 1992 runoff in Georg a was a hotly contested race between the Democratic incumbent Wyche Fowler, and his Republican opponent, Paul Coverdell. The Republicans presented this election as a %ust-win81 election. Exhibit 1. The Republicans were so intent on victory that Senator Dole announced he was willing to give up his seat on the Senate Agriculture Committee for Coverdell, if necessary.
  • Peter Conti-Brown*

    Peter Conti-Brown*

    CONTI-BROWN 64 STAN. L. REV. 409 (DO NOT DELETE) 2/16/2012 3:58 PM ELECTIVE SHAREHOLDER LIABILITY Peter Conti-Brown* Government bailouts are expensive, unjust, and unpopular, and they usually represent dramatic deviations from the rule of law. They are also, in some cases, necessary. The problem that bailouts pose, then, is that they are almost always inimical to the interests of society, except when they are not. This complexity is ignored under the recent Dodd-Frank Act, which improbably guarantees an end to taxpayer bailouts. Indeed, much of the Act makes bailouts more likely, not less, by making the wrong kind of bailouts available far too often. This Article proposes to solve the problem of bailouts by retaining governmental ability to make the right kinds of bailouts possible through forcing the bailed-out firms to internalize the bailout costs. The proposal—called “elective shareholder liability”—allows bank shareholders two options. They must either change their bank’s capital structure to include dramatically less debt, consistent with the consensus recommendation of leading economists; or alternatively, they must add a bailout exception to their bank’s limited- shareholder-liability status, thus requiring shareholders—not taxpayers—to cover the ultimate costs of the bank’s failure. This liability would be structured as a governmental collection, similar to a tax assessment, for the recoupment of all bailout costs against the shareholders on a pro rata basis. It would also include an up-front stay on collections to ensure that there are, in fact, taxpayer losses to be recouped and to mitigate government incentives for overbailout, political manipulation, and crisis exacerbation.
  • The Future of Work of Future The

    The Future of Work of Future The

    Communications and Society Program Bollier THE FUTURE OF WORK What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments THE FUTURE OF WORK By David Bollier Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, MD 21658 11-003 THE FUTURE OF WORK What It Means for Individuals, Businesses, Markets and Governments By David Bollier Communications and Society Program Charles M. Firestone Executive Director Washington, D.C. 2011 To purchase additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute Publications Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (410) 820-5326 Fax: (410) 827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] For all other inquiries, please contact: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 736-5818 Fax: (202) 467-0790 Charles M. Firestone Patricia K. Kelly Executive Director Assistant Director Copyright © 2011 by The Aspen Institute This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2010 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-543-9 11/004 Contents FOREWORD, Charles M. Firestone .............................................................vii THE FUTURE OF WORK: WHAT IT MEANS FOR INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESSES, MARKETS AND GOVERNMENTS, David Bollier Introduction ...............................................................................................
  • Washington Update

    Washington Update

    WASHINGTON UPDATE A MONTHLY NEWSLETTER Vol 5 No 3 Published by the AUSA Institute of Land Warfare March 1993 PRESIDENT CLINTON'S ECONOMIC PLAN, ASPIN'S $10.8 BILLION BUDGET CUT hits the announced Feb. 17, calls for defense spending cuts of Army to the tune of $2.5 billion. The Army reportedly $127 billion in budget authority by 1997 from the pro­ met the Defense Secretary's Feb. 2 order to cut that posal of former President Bush. Details of just where the amount from a $64.1 billion proposed FY 1994 budget cuts will come must wait until release of the Clinton FY by offering to cancel a number of major weapons now in 1994 Defense budget-expected around the end of production or development and by accelerating the draw­ March. All that is known to date is that the President down of troops from Europe. How many of these will plans a 1.4 million active-duty force (vice Bush's 1.6 make it through the budget process is pure speculation at million); cuts the U.S. force in Europe to about 100,000, this point. The specific reductions won't be known until (Bush projected 150,000); freezes the SDI program at President Clinton sends his FY 1994 budget to Capitol $3.8 billion a year, (Bush saw $6.3 billion request for FY Hill (expected late March), but "Pentagon officials" have 1994 alone); and imposes a freeze on federal pay in­ commented in the media that the Army proposes to cut: creases in 1994 and limited raises thereafter.
  • The History and Politics of Defense Reviews

    The History and Politics of Defense Reviews

    C O R P O R A T I O N The History and Politics of Defense Reviews Raphael S. Cohen For more information on this publication, visit www.rand.org/t/RR2278 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN: 978-0-8330-9973-0 Published by the RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, Calif. © Copyright 2018 RAND Corporation R® is a registered trademark. Limited Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited. Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions. The RAND Corporation is a research organization that develops solutions to public policy challenges to help make communities throughout the world safer and more secure, healthier and more prosperous. RAND is nonprofit, nonpartisan, and committed to the public interest. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. Support RAND Make a tax-deductible charitable contribution at www.rand.org/giving/contribute www.rand.org Preface The 1993 Bottom-Up Review starts with this challenge: “Now that the Cold War is over, the questions we face in the Department of Defense are: How do we structure the armed forces of the United States for the future? How much defense is enough in the post–Cold War era?”1 Finding a satisfactory answer to these deceptively simple questions not only motivated the Bottom-Up Review but has arguably animated defense strategy for the past quarter century.
  • White House Staffs: a Study

    White House Staffs: a Study

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Supervised Undergraduate Student Research Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects and Creative Work 5-1997 White House Staffs: A Study Eric Jackson Stansell University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj Recommended Citation Stansell, Eric Jackson, "White House Staffs: A Study" (1997). Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/241 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Supervised Undergraduate Student Research and Creative Work at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chancellor’s Honors Program Projects by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNIVERSITY HONORS PROGRAM SENIOR PROJECT - APPROVAL Name: _Er~ __ ~t~~~g.Jl ____________________________________ _ College: J:..t"j.§_~ __~=i.~~~,=-~___ Department: _Cc:.ti~:a-t:;..-_~~_~~l~!:"~ __ - Faculty Mentor: __Q~!.. ___ M~~69&-1 ___ f~j"k%~.r~ld _________________ _ PROJECT TITLE: __~_\i.hik_H<?.~&_~t",-{:f~~ __ ~__ ~jM-/_: ________ _ I have reviewed this completed senior honors thesis with this student and certify that it is a project commensurate with honors level undergraduate research in this field. Signed: ~~#_~::t~~ Faculty Mentor ______________ , Date: ~/l7.t-~EL ______ --- Comments (Optional): "White House Staffs: A Study" by Eric Stansell August 11, 1997 "White House StatTs: A Study" by Eric Stansell Abstract In its current form, the modem presidency consists of much more than just a single individual elected to serve as the head of government.
  • 9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp

    9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp

    Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5.
  • Michael Krasny Has Interviewed a Wide Range of Major Political and Cultural Figures Including Edward Albee, Madeleine Albright

    Michael Krasny Has Interviewed a Wide Range of Major Political and Cultural Figures Including Edward Albee, Madeleine Albright

    Michael Krasny has interviewed a wide range of major political and cultural figures including Edward Albee, Madeleine Albright, Sherman Alexei, Robert Altman, Maya Angelou, Margaret Atwood, Ken Auletta, Paul Auster, Richard Avedon, Joan Baez, Alec Baldwin, Dave Barry, Harry Belafonte, Annette Bening, Wendell Berry, Claire Bloom, Andy Borowitz, T.S. Boyle, Ray Bradbury, Ben Bradlee, Bill Bradley, Stephen Breyer, Tom Brokaw, David Brooks, Patrick Buchanan, William F. Buckley Jr, Jimmy Carter, James Carville, Michael Chabon, Noam Chomsky, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Cesar Chavez, Bill Cosby, Sandra Cisneros, Billy Collins, Pat Conroy, Francis Ford Coppola, Jacques Cousteau, Michael Crichton, Francis Crick, Mario Cuomo, Tony Curtis, Marc Danner, Ted Danson, Don DeLillo, Gerard Depardieu, Junot Diaz, Leonardo DiCaprio, Joan Didion, Maureen Dowd. Jennifer Egan, Daniel Ellsberg, Rahm Emanuel, Nora Ephron, Susan Faludi, Diane Feinstein, Jane Fonda, Barney Frank, Jonathan Franzen, Lady Antonia Fraser, Thomas Friedman, Carlos Fuentes, John Kenneth Galbraith, Andy Garcia, Jerry Garcia, Robert Gates, Newt Gingrich, Allen Ginsberg, Malcolm Gladwell, Danny Glover, Jane Goodall, Stephen Greenblatt, Matt Groening, Sammy Hagar, Woody Harrelson, Robert Hass, Werner Herzog, Christopher Hitchens, Nick Hornby, Khaled Hosseini, Patricia Ireland, Kazuo Ishiguro, Molly Ivins, Jesse Jackson, PD James, Bill T. Jones, James Earl Jones, Ashley Judd, Pauline Kael, John Kerry, Tracy Kidder, Barbara Kingsolver, Alonzo King, Galway Kinnell, Ertha Kitt, Paul Krugman, Ray
  • Administration Officials' Biographies

    Administration Officials' Biographies

    THE PRESIDENT ’S MANAGEMENT ADVISORY BOARD Administration Officials Senior Executive Service (SES) Session Scott Gould, Deputy Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs Seth Harris, Deputy Secretary, Department of Labor Christine Kluh, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs David Lebryk, Commissioner of the Financial Management Service, Department of the Treasury Katie Malague, Performance Manager, White House Office of Management and Budget Catherine Murphy, Regional Solicitor, Department of Labor Stephen Shih, Deputy Associate Director for Executive Resources and Employee Development, Office of Personnel Management Denise Wells, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Resources and Chief Human Capital Officer, Department of Health and Human Services W. SCOTT GOULD, DEPUTY SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS W. Scott Gould was nominated by President Obama to serve as Deputy Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and subsequently confirmed by the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee on April 2, 2009. As Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Gould serves as the chief operating officer of the federal government's second largest department, responsible for a nationwide system of health care services, benefits programs and national cemeteries for America’s veterans and their dependents. Prior to his appointment to the VA, Gould was Vice President for public sector strategy at IBM Global Business Services where he focused on strategy and innovation. Previously, he was Chief Executive Officer of The O’Gara Company, a strategic advisory and investment services firm, and Chief Operating Officer of Exolve, a technology services company. The former Chief Financial Officer and Assistant Secretary for Administration at the Department of Commerce, Gould has also served as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Finance and Management at the Treasury Department.
  • Speaker Listing

    Speaker Listing

    SPEAKER LISTING 2020-21 2010-11 Harrison Hickman ’75 | Peniel Joseph Majora Carter | David Brooks | President Bill Clinton John Avlon & Margaret Hoover (w/Mark Updegrove) Jeannette Walls | Jean-Michel Cousteau Ian Bremmer | Sally Field (w/Pat Mitchell) Paul Nicklen | Theresa May | Colson Whitehead 2009-10 Garry Trudeau | Yo-Yo Ma | Paul Krugman 2019-20 Anna Deavere Smith | David Gregory Laura Bush | Stephen Breyer Doris Kearns Goodwin (w/Mark Updegrove) 2008-09 Khaled Hosseini | Christiane Amanpour & James Rubin 2018-19 Sir Salman Rushdie | Anthony Bourdain @ DPAC Karl Rove & David Axelrod | Kareem Abdul-Jabbar Anna Quindlen Julia Gillard | Dr. Paul Farmer | Diana Nyad 2007-08 2017-18 Kathleen Turner, Louis Gossett Jr. & Jane Seymour Joe & Jill Biden | Lisa Genova | Leslie Odom Jr. Isabel Allende | J.C. Watts | Bob Woodward Reza Aslan | Ted Koppel | Brandon Stanton 2006-07 2016-17 Mary Robinson | David McCullough | Toni Morrison Michael Pollan | Mark & Scott Kelly | Amal Clooney Neil deGrasse Tyson | Bryan Stevenson | Alan Alda 2005-06 Karen Armstrong | Desmond Tutu | Bill Moyers 2015-16 *Garrison Keillor (2 shows) Robin Wright | Atul Gawande | Jon Meacham 2004 - 05 George Takei | Malcolm Gladwell Cokie Roberts | Mikhail Gorbachev | Mary Pipher 2014-15 Michael Beschloss Ron Howard (w/Leonard Maltin) | Bill Bryson 2003-04 Margaret Atwood (w/ Roger Rosenblatt) Dr. Sherwin Nuland | Edward Albee | Ken Burns Robert Reich | Anderson Cooper Sidney Poitier | George J. Mitchell 2013-14 2002-03 Robert Gates | Robert Ballard | Itzhak Perlman Ernest Gaines | Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Elizabeth Alexander | Steve Kroft and Lesley Stahl 2001-02 2012-13 Madeleine Albright | Oscar Arias and Ralph Nader Tina Brown | Tom Brokaw | Geoffrey Canada Bill Bradley, Jeb Bush and Gwen Ifill 2000-01 Thomas Friedman Doris Kearns Goodwin | Jack Miles | Bill Bradley Neil deGrasse Tyson 2011-12 Tony Blair | Twyla Tharp | Sanjay Gupta 1999 *David McCullough @ Reynolds Auditorium Colin Powell Ken Burns | Fareed Zakaria 1996 Thomas Friedman.

  • JFQ 31 JFQ▼ FORUM Sponds to Aggravated Peacekeeping in Joint Pub 3–0

    0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page ii The greatest lesson of this war has been the extent to which air, land, and sea operations can and must be coordinated by joint planning and unified command. —General Henry H. (“Hap”) Arnold Report to the Secretary of War Cover 2 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/27/04 7:18 AM Page iii JFQ Page 1—no folio 0203 C2 & Pgs 1-3 3/3/04 9:07 AM Page 2 CONTENTS A Word from the Chairman 4 by John M. Shalikashvili In This Issue 6 by the Editor-in-Chief Living Jointness 7 by William A. Owens Taking Stock of the New Joint Age 15 by Ike Skelton JFQ Assessing the Bottom-Up Review 22 by Andrew F. Krepinevich, Jr. JOINT FORCE QUARTERLY Living Jointness JFQ FORUM Bottom-Up Review Standing Up JFQ Joint Education Coalitions Theater Missle Vietnam Defense as Military History Standing Up Coalitions Atkinson‘s Crusade Defense Transportation 25 The Whats and Whys of Coalitions 26 by Anne M. Dixon 94 W93inter Implications for U.N. Peacekeeping A PROFESSIONAL MILITARY JOURNAL 29 by John O.B. Sewall PHOTO CREDITS The cover features an Abrams main battle tank at National Training Center (Military The Cutting Edge of Unified Actions Photography/Greg Stewart). Insets: [top left] 34 by Thomas C. Linn Operation Desert Storm coalition officers reviewing forces in Kuwait City (DOD), [bottom left] infantrymen fording a stream in Vietnam Preparing Future Coalition Commanders (DOD), [top right] students at the Armed Forces Staff College (DOD), and [bottom right] a test 40 by Terry J.