CSGR 3rd Annual Conference AFTER THE GLOBAL CRISES: WHAT NEXT FOR REGIONALISM? Scarman House, University of Warwick 16–18 September 1999 Regional Responses to the Southeast Asian Financial Crisis: A Case of Self-Help or No Help? CHANG LI LIN* AND RAMKISHEN S. RAJAN** * Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), Singapore ** School of Economics, University of Adelaide, Australia and Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), Singapore 1 REGIONAL RESPONSES TO THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS: A CASE OF SELF-HELP OR NO HELP? By Chang Li Lin* and Ramkishen S. Rajan** * Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), Singapore. E-mail:
[email protected] ** School of Economics, University of Adelaide, Australia and Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), Singapore. E-mail:
[email protected] The views expressed are strictly personal. Unless otherwise stated, all $ refer to US$. 2 REGIONAL RESPONSES TO THE SOUTHEAST ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS: A CASE OF SELF-HELP OR NO HELP? Abstract The currency crises of the 1990s, particularly the one that hit Southeast Asia since the devaluation of the Thai baht on July 2, 1997, are suggestive of the relevance and pervasiveness of contagion or negative spillover effects that are largely regional in scope. As such, one of the mantras since the onset of the Southeast Asian financial crisis has been the need for “regional solutions to regional problems”. Given that the two focal institutions in Southeast Asia, viz. the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) were perceived as being successful in their past attempts in problem-solving, there were high expectations that such regionalism would be key in finding solutions to the Southeast Asian financial crisis and mitigating the after- shocks.