Traumaticinjuryto Peripheral Nerves
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Jpn J Rehabil Med 2005; 42: 89-98 2004年/第 41回 日本リハビリテーション医学会 学術集会/東京 Invited Lecture Traumatic Injury to Peripheral Nerves Lawrence R Robinson, MD isolated nervous system injury, but may also Epidemiology of Peripheral Nerve often accompany CNS trauma, not only Trauma compounding the disability, but making recog- nition of the peripheral nerve lesion problem- Traumatic injury to peripheral nerves results atic. Of patients with peripheral nerve injuries, in considerable disability across the world. In about 60% have a traumatic brain injury. peacetime, peripheral nerve injuries commonly Conversely, of those with traumatic brain result from trauma due to motor vehicle acci- injury admitted to rehabilitation units,10-34% dents, and less commonly from penetrating have associated peripheral nerve injuries. trauma, falls and industrial accidents. Out of It is often easy to miss peripheral nerve injuries all patients admitted to Level I trauma centers, in the setting of CNS trauma. Since the neuro- it is estimated that roughly 2-3% have periph- logic history and examination is limited, early eral nerve injuries. If plexus and root hints to a superimposed peripheral nerve lesion injuries are also included,the incidence is about might be only flaccidity,areflexia,and reduced 5%. movement of a limb. In the upper limb,the nerve most commonly Peripheral nerve injuries are of significant reported injured is the radial nerve,followed by import as they impede recovery of function and ulnar and median nerves. Lower limb return to work, and carry risk of secondary peripheral nerve injuries are less common,with disabilities from falls,fractures,or other secon- the sciatic most frequently injured,followed by dary injuries. An understanding of the classifi- peroneal and rarely tibial or femoral nerves. cation,pathophysiology and electrodiagnosis of Fractures of nearby bones are commonly as- these lesions is critical to the appropriate diag- sociated,such as humeral fractures with radial nosis, localization and management of periph- neuropathy. eral nerve trauma. In wartime,peripheral nerve trauma is much more common and much of our knowledge Classification of Nerve Injuries about peripheral nerve injury,repair and recov- ery comes from experience derived in World There are two predominant schemes that War I and II, and subsequent wars. have been proposed for classification of periph- Peripheral nerve injuries may be seen as an eral nerve traumatic injuries; that of Seddon Used by permission, copyright 2000AAEM. This manuscript is based on the monograph “Traumatic Injury to Peripheral Nerves”published by the AAEM in Muscle& Nerve 2000; 23: 863-873. The monograph can be purchased from AAEM at (507)-288-0100. Professor and Chair, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 リハビリテーション医学 VOL.42 NO.2 2005年 2月 Lawrence R ROBINSON Table 1 Classification systems for nerve injury Seddon Sunderland Pathology Prognosis Classification Classification Neurapraxia First Degree Myelin Injury or Ischemia Excellent recovery in weeks to months Axonotmesis Axons Disrupted Good to poor, depending upon integrity of Variable Stromal Disruption supporting structures and distance to muscle Second Degree Axons Disrupted Good, depending upon distance to muscle Endoneurial Tubes Intact Perineurium Intact Epineurium Intact Third Degree Axons Disrupted Poor Endoneurial Tubes Disrupted Axonal misdirection Perineurium Intact Surgery may be required Epineurium Intact Fourth Degree Axons Disrupted Poor Endoneurial Tubes Disrupted Axonal misdirection Perineurium Disrupted Surgery usually required Epineurium Intact Neurotmesis Fifth Degree Axon Disrupted No spontaneous recovery Endoneurial Tubes Disrupted Surgery required Perineurium Disrupted Prognosis after surgery guarded Epineurium Dis rupted Adapted from Dillingham. and that of Sunderland(Table 1). The for- scar tissue that axonal regrowth is impossible. mer is more commonly used in the literature. Examples are s harp injury, some traction Seddon has used the terms neurapraxia, axono t- injuries or injection of noxious drugs. Progno- mesis, and neurotmesis to describe peripheral sis for spontaneous recovery is extremely poor nerve injuries.Neurapraxia is a comparative- without surgical intervention. Sunderland ly mild injury with motor and sensory loss but uses a more subdivided scheme to describe no evidence of Wallerian degeneration. The peripheral nerve injuries, with five groups nerve distally conducts normally. Focal instead of three. demyelination and/or ischemia are thought to be the etiologies of the conduction block. Electrodiagnosis: Timing of Changes and Recovery may occur within hours,days,weeks, Determining Degree of Injury or up to a few months. Axonotmesis is common- ly seen in crush injuries. The axons and their 1. The Compound Motor Action Potential myelin sheaths are broken,yet the surrounding Neurapraxia: In purely neurapraxic lesions, stroma (i.e.the endoneurium,perineurium,and the compound muscle action potential(CMAP) epineurium) remains partially or fully intact. will change immediately after injury,assuming Wallerian degeneration occurs, but subsequent one can stimulate both above and below the site axonal regrowth may proceed along the intact of the lesion (Fig.1). When recording from endoneurial tubes. Recovery ultimately distal muscles and stimulating distal to the site depends upon the degree of internal disorgani- of the lesion, the CMAP should always be zation in the nerve as well as the distance to the normal since no axonal loss and no Wallerian end organ. Sunderland’s classification (below) degeneration has occurred. Moving stimulation further divides this category. Neurotmesis proximal to the lesion will produce a smaller or describes a nerve that has been either complete- absent CMAP, as conduction in some or all ly severed or is so markedly disorganized by fibers is blocked. It should be remembered that Jpn J Rehabil Med VOL.42 NO.2 2005 Traumatic Injury to Peripheral Nerves Fig.1 Diagrammatic representation of changes in Fig.2 Diagrammatic representation of changes in the compound muscle action potential the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) after axonotmesis and neurot- (CMAP)after neurapraxia. mesis. amplitudes normally fall with increasing dis- tance between stimulation and recording ; “few days”thereafter, the CMAP and motor hence there is some debate about how much of conduction studies look the same as those seen a drop in amplitude is sufficient to demonstrate in a neurapraxic lesion. Nerve segments distal conduction block. Amplitude drops exceeding to the lesion remain excitable and demonstrate 20% over a 25cm distance or less are clearly normal conduction while proximal stimulation abnormal; smaller changes over smaller dis- results in an absent or small response from tances are likely also suggestive of an abnor- distal muscles . Early on,this picture looks the mality. In addition to conduction block,partial same as conduction block and can be confused lesions also often demonstrate concomitant with neurapraxia. Hence neurapraxia and slowing across the lesion. This slowing may be axontomeis can not be distinguished until due to either loss of faster conducting fibers or sufficient time for Wallerian degeneration in all demyelination of surviving fibers. All these motor fibers has occurred, typically about 9 changes in the CMAP will generally persist days post injury(Fig.2). until recovery takes place,typically by no more As Wallerian degeneration occurs,the ampli- than a few months post injury. Most important- tude of the CMAP elicited with distal stimula- ly, the distal CMAP will never drop in ampli- tion will fall. This starts at about day3and is tude in purely neurapraxic injuries, since no complete by about day 9. Neuromuscular axon loss or Wallerian degeneration occurs and junction transmission fails before nerve ex- the distal nerve segment remains normally citability.Thus in complete axonotmesis at excitable. day 9, one has a very different picture from Axonotmesis and Neurotmesis : Electro- neurapraxia. There are absent responses both diagnostically, complete axonotmesis (equiva- above and below the lesion. Partial axon loss lent to Sunderland grades 2,3and 4)and com- lesions will produce small amplitude motor plete neurotmesis look the same, since the responses, with the amplitude of the CMAP difference between these types of lesions is in roughly proportional to the number of surviving the integrity of the supporting structures,which axons. One can compare side-to-side CMAP have no electrophysiologic function. Thus amplitudes to estimate the degree of axon loss, these lesions can be grouped together as though inherent side to side variability of up to axonotmesis for the purpose of this discussion. 30-50% limits the accuracy of the estimate. Immediately after axonotmesis and for a Using the CMAP amplitude to estimate the リハビリテーション医学 VOL.42 NO.2 2005年 2月 Lawrence R ROBINSON 2. Compound or Sensory Nerve Action Potentials Neurapraxia: The sensory nerve action potential (SNAP)and compound nerve action potential(CNAP)will show changes similar to the CMAP after focal nerve injury. In the setting of neurapraxia,there is a focal conduc- tion block at the site of the lesion,with preser- ved distal amplitude. However,the criteria for establishing conduction block in sensory nerve Fig.3 Diagrammatic representation of changes in fibers are substantially different than that for the compound muscle action potential the CMAP. When recording nerve action (CMAP)after