The Boko Haram Insurgency Revisited
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PRISM Syrian Supplemental
PRISM syria A JOURNAL OF THE CENTER FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS About PRISM PRISM is published by the Center for Complex Operations. PRISM is a security studies journal chartered to inform members of U.S. Federal agencies, allies, and other partners Vol. 4, Syria Supplement on complex and integrated national security operations; reconstruction and state-building; 2014 relevant policy and strategy; lessons learned; and developments in training and education to transform America’s security and development Editor Michael Miklaucic Communications Contributing Editors Constructive comments and contributions are important to us. Direct Alexa Courtney communications to: David Kilcullen Nate Rosenblatt Editor, PRISM 260 Fifth Avenue (Building 64, Room 3605) Copy Editors Fort Lesley J. McNair Dale Erikson Washington, DC 20319 Rebecca Harper Sara Thannhauser Lesley Warner Telephone: Nathan White (202) 685-3442 FAX: (202) 685-3581 Editorial Assistant Email: [email protected] Ava Cacciolfi Production Supervisor Carib Mendez Contributions PRISM welcomes submission of scholarly, independent research from security policymakers Advisory Board and shapers, security analysts, academic specialists, and civilians from the United States Dr. Gordon Adams and abroad. Submit articles for consideration to the address above or by email to prism@ Dr. Pauline H. Baker ndu.edu with “Attention Submissions Editor” in the subject line. Ambassador Rick Barton Professor Alain Bauer This is the authoritative, official U.S. Department of Defense edition of PRISM. Dr. Joseph J. Collins (ex officio) Any copyrighted portions of this journal may not be reproduced or extracted Ambassador James F. Dobbins without permission of the copyright proprietors. PRISM should be acknowledged whenever material is quoted from or based on its content. -
Afghan Women at the Crossroads: Agents of Peace—Or Its Victims?
AFGHAN WOMEN AT THE CROSSROADS: AGENTS OF PEACE—OR ITS VICTIMS? ORZALA ASHRAF NEMAT A CENTURY FOUNDATION REPORT The Century Foundation Headquarters: 41 East 70th Street, New York, New York 10021 D 212.535.4441 D.C.: 1333 H Street, N.W., 10th floor, Washington, D.C. 20005 D 202.387.0400 THE CENTURY FOUNDATION PROJECT ON AFGHANISTAN IN ITS REGIONAL AND MULTILATERAL DIMENSIONS This paper is one of a series commissioned by The Century Foundation as part of its project on Afghanistan in its regional and multilateral dimensions. This initiative is examining ways in which the international community may take greater collective responsibility for effectively assisting Afghanistan’s transition from a war-ridden failed state to a fragile but reasonably peaceful one. The program adds an internationalist and multilateral lens to the policy debate on Afghanistan both in the United States and globally, engaging the representatives of governments, international nongovernmental organizations, and the United Nations in the exploration of policy options toward Afghanistan and the other states in the region. At the center of the project is a task force of American and international figures who have had significant governmental, nongovernmental, or UN experience in the region, co-chaired by Lakhdar Brahimi and Thomas Pickering, respectively former UN special representative for Afghanistan and former U.S. undersecretary of state for political affairs. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors. Nothing written here is to be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Century Foundation or as an attempt to aid or hinder the passage of any bill before Congress. -
Crisiswatch, Nr. 73
1 September 2009, No73 Board of Trustees Co-Chairs CrisisWatch: Christopher Patten summarises briefly developments during the previous month in some 70 situations of current or potential Thomas Pickering conflict, listed alphabetically by region, providing references and links to more detailed information sources (all references mentioned are hyperlinked in the electronic version of this bulletin); President and CEO assesses whether the overall situation in each case has, during the previous month, significantly deteriorated, Louise Arbour significantly improved, or on balance remained more or less unchanged; alerts readers to situations where, in the coming month, there is a particular risk of new or significantly Executive Committee escalated conflict, or a particular conflict resolution opportunity (noting that in some instances there may in Morton Abramowitz Emma Bonino* fact be both); and Cheryl Carolus summarises Crisis Group’s reports and briefing papers that have been published in the last month. Maria Livanos Cattaui Yoichi Funabashi CrisisWatch is compiled by Crisis Group’s Brussels Research Unit, drawing on multiple sources including Frank Giustra the resources of our some 130 staff members across five continents, who already report on some 60 of the Stephen Solarz situations listed here. Comments and suggestions can be sent to [email protected]. George Soros Pär Stenbäck To search past issues of CrisisWatch visit our databases and resources page at www.crisisgroup.org. *Vice-Chair Adnan Abu-Odeh August 2009 Trends Kenneth Adelman Turki al-Faisal Deteriorated Situations Improved Situations Kofi Annan Louise Arbour Chechnya (Russia) (p. 8) Armenia/Turkey (p. 8) Richard Armitage Niger (p. 4) Mali (p. 4) Paddy Ashdown North Caucasus (non-Chechnya) (p. -
International Initiatives Committee Book Discussion
INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVES COMMITTEE BOOK DISCUSSION POSSIBILITIES Compiled by Krista Hartman, updated 12/2015 All titles in this list are available at the MVCC Utica Campus Library. Books already discussed: Achebe, Chinua. Things Fall Apart. (Nigeria ; Fiction) Badkken, Anna. Peace Meals: Candy-Wrapped Kalashnikovs and Other War Stories. Cohen, Michelle Corasanti. The Almond Tree. (Palestine/Israel/US ; Fiction) Hosseini, Khaled. A Thousand Splendid Suns. (Afghanistan ; Fiction) Lahiri, Jhumpa. The Namesake. (East Indian immigrants in US ; Fiction) Maathai, Wangari. Unbowed: a Memoir. (Kenya) Menzel, Peter & D’Alusio, Faith. Hungry Planet: What the World Eats. Barolini, Helen. Umbertina. (Italian American) Spring 2016 selection: Running for My Life by Lopez Lomong (Sudan) (see below) **************************************************************************************** Abdi, Hawa. Keeping Hope Alive: One Woman—90,000 Lives Changed. (Somalia) The moving memoir of one brave woman who, along with her daughters, has kept 90,000 of her fellow citizens safe, healthy, and educated for over 20 years in Somalia. Dr. Hawa Abdi, "the Mother Teresa of Somalia" and Nobel Peace Prize nominee, is the founder of a massive camp for internally displaced people located a few miles from war-torn Mogadishu, Somalia. Since 1991, when the Somali government collapsed, famine struck, and aid groups fled, she has dedicated herself to providing help for people whose lives have been shattered by violence and poverty. She turned her 1300 acres of farmland into a camp that has numbered up to 90,000 displaced people, ignoring the clan lines that have often served to divide the country. She inspired her daughters, Deqo and Amina, to become doctors. Together, they have saved tens of thousands of lives in her hospital, while providing an education to hundreds of displaced children. -
Transitional Justice and Violent Extremism
i n s t i t u t e f o r i n t e g r at e d t r a n s i t i o n s Transitional Justice and Violent Extremism September 2020 About IFIT The Institute for Integrated Transitions (IFIT) aims to help fragile and conflict-affected states achieve more sustainable transitions out of war or authoritarianism by serving as an inde- pendent expert resource for locally-led efforts to improve political, economic, social and security conditions. IFIT seeks to transform current practice away from fragmented inter- ventions and toward more integrated solutions that strengthen peace, democracy and human rights in countries attempting to break cycles of conflict or repression. The ideas in this publication are informed by the diverse global experiences of IFIT’s Law and Peace Practice Group, whose members have had direct involvement in the negotia- tion of amnesty and accountability issues in over 20 countries. About the Project This publication is part of a project that aims to fill a major gap in policy making: the fail- ure to integrate lessons learnt and best practices from the field of transitional justice in relation to conflict resolution strategies with two kinds of unconventional armed actors: 1) “violent extremist” groups, such as jihadists; and 2) organised crime groups, such as mafia, gang networks and drug cartels. IFIT’s work on the former began in 2017 with the UN University Centre for Policy Research (UNU-CPR). The project was concerned with the fact that, to date, what has reigned is an overwhelmingly punitive and dragnet approach which, rather than helping address root causes and break cycles of resentment and vio- lence, instead risks renewing or reinforcing them. -
Muslim Democratic Parties: Economic Liberalization and Islamist Moderation in the Middle East
Muslim Democratic Parties: Economic Liberalization and Islamist Moderation in the Middle East Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Abdulkadir Yildirim, M.A. Graduate Program in Political Science The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Sarah M. Brooks, Co-Chair Amaney A. Jamal, Co-Chair Marcus J. Kurtz Irfan Nooruddin Copyright by Abdulkadir Yildirim 2010 Abstract Islamist political parties – once marked by their uniformity across countries in their oppositional and non-democratic platforms, and the goal of Islamizing state and society – face challenges leading to the emergence of a qualitatively-different and more moderate kind of political party: the Muslim democratic party (MDP). My dissertation answers two interrelated questions on the rise of MDPs: What explains the emergence of Muslim Democratic Parties recently, and why have these parties been successful in some cases, but not others? I theorize that the way in which a country liberalizes its economy shapes the social foundations of Islamic party politics. MDPs emerge and find societal support when Islamic peripheral businesses find a chance to compete economically – a feature of competitive liberalization –, and peripheral masses experience an improved income. In contrast, when economic liberalization’s reach remains limited because of its uncompetitive character and the perpetuation of pre-liberalization economic structure, societal support for MDPs fails to materialize, leaving Islamist parties’ societal support intact. I call this process crony liberalization. I test my theory in a three-country, structured comparison of Egypt, Morocco and Turkey. These countries were selected in order to maximize the variance I observe on my key causal variables while holding other factors constant following the most similar systems design. -
Afghanistan Study Group Final Report
Afghanistan Study Group Final Report FEBRUARY 2021 AFGHANISTAN STUDY GROUP Members of the Afghanistan Study Group Co-chairs Senator Kelly A. Ayotte General Joseph F. Dunford Jr. (Ret.) Ms. Nancy Lindborg Study Group Members Ms. Nisha Biswal Ms. Susan Gordon Mr. David Miliband Ambassador James Dobbins Ambassador Mark Green Ms. Lisa Monaco Senator Joe Donnelly Ambassador Marc Grossman Dr. Meghan O’Sullivan Ms. Michèle Flournoy Mr. Stephen J. Hadley General Curtis Scaparrotti (Ret.) This report, which was drafted in December 2020 and January 2021, represents the consensus of a bipartisan and independent Study Group with diverse expertise and affiliations. No member may be satisfied with every formulation and argument in isolation. The findings of this report are solely those of the Afghanistan Study Group. They do not necessarily represent the views of the United States Institute of Peace or the senior advisers who contributed their time and expertise to the deliberations of the Group and the content of this report. All members and senior advisers participated in their personal capacity and on a volunteer basis. Cover includes artwork by Pyty/Shutterstock. Maps on pages 5 and 7 created by Lucidity Information Design. United States Institute of Peace 2301 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20037 Phone: 202.457.1700 Fax: 202.429.6063 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www . usip.org Making Peace Possible Afghanistan Study Group Final Report A Pathway for Peace in Afghanistan FEBRUARY 2021 Contents Letter from the Co-chairs ........................................ 2 Recommendations ................................................ 47 1. Clarify the End State .................................................... 47 Executive Summary ................................................. 4 2. Reinforce the Conditionality of a Final U.S. -
Our Rights Are Fundamental to Peace” Slow Implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) Denies the Rights of Women and Girls in Armed Conflict
HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH “Our Rights are Fundamental to Peace” Slow Implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (2000) Denies the Rights of Women and Girls in Armed Conflict The revolution made us proud to be there on the front line and men were forced to accept us. But now there are some who think it is time for women to go home. S@KV@ BTFG@HFGHR, K@VXDQ @MC GTL@M QHFGSR @BSHUHRS, BDMFG@YH, LHAX@, JTKX 2012 1 On the eve of Libya’s first democratic national election, Haja Nowara held a vigil in the square outside the courthouse in Benghazi, where she had spent many evenings supporting the revolution since early 2011. “I have waited my whole life for tomorrow, which will be a new day for Libya,” said Nowara, who would be voting for the first time in her life. “We sacrificed a lot to get here.” © 2012 Samer Muscati/Human Rights Watch “OUR RIGHTS ARE FUNDAMENTAL TO PEACE” In 2011, women were at the forefront as the Arab Spring erupted in Libya, organizing and demanding their rights to have a voice in their country’s future. The ensuing civil war resulted in the former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi being toppled. In the transitional period following that armed conflict women organized as voters and candidates in preparation for elections, documented human rights abuses, and worked to ensure any new constitution would enshrine women’s rights. Iman and Salwa Bughaighis—sisters and human rights activists—were among the key organizers of the first demonstrations against Gaddafi in Benghazi in February 2011. -
Making the 2004 Constitution of Afghanistan: a History and Analysis Through the Lens Of
Making the 2004 Constitution of Afghanistan: A History and Analysis Through the Lens of Coordination and Deferral Theory Shamshad Pasarlay A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2016 Reading Committee: Clark Lombardi, Chair Joseph Janes Jonathan Eddy Hugh Spitzer Rachel Cichowski Program Authorized to Offer Degree: School of Law © Copyright 2016 Shamshad Pasarlay University of Washington ABSTRACT Making the 2004 Constitution of Afghanistan: A History and Analysis Through the Lens of Coordination and Deferral Theory Shamshad Pasarlay Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Clark Lombardi School of Law My objective in this dissertation is to provide a theoretically informed history of Afghanistan’s many constitutions. While Afghanistan’s constitutional history has attracted considerable scholarly attention, it remains under-examined from a theoretical perspective. Building on insights from coordination theory and constitutional deferral theory, this dissertation attempts to tell a complete, nuanced, and theoretically informed constitutional history of Afghanistan as well as a history of the drafting and reception of the 2004 Constitution of Afghanistan. Through this analysis, it normatively judges Afghan constitutions by examining whether they coordinated the various disparate factions of this deeply divided country. This dissertation finds that the most successful Afghan constitutions deliberately left major issues unresolved when powerful -
And a Void in the Center. Afghanistan's Political Parties and Where They Come from (1902-2006)
Islamists, Leftists – and a Void in the Center. Afghanistan's Political Parties and where they come from (1902-2006) Thomas Ruttig Preface With his new publication Thomas Ruttig presents us with a piece of work that is truly remarkable and unique in various regards. It is far more than a mere enumeration and characterization of political parties in Afghanistan, but rather an abstract of Afghan history with a particular focus on the development of organised political movements. The reader is taken on a journey starting out in the early days of the last century when small groups of independent political thinkers in Afghanistan, for the first time, set about agreeing on political aims and adopting a common political agenda. Thomas Ruttig, who has been working on Afghanistan for more than 25 years, analyses the stream of political groupings and parties, neatly intertwining it with political events and developments in the course of the decades. Using his knowledge of both Dari and Pashto, the author also introduces us to the emerging Afghan literature on this subject. Thus, he provides the reader with a deep and detailed insight into prevailing structures and determinants of political life in Afghanistan. Furthermore, his paper makes us aware that the history of an Afghanistan striving for political pluralism and democracy does certainly not begin only after the fall of the Taliban regime five years ago. This should broaden our knowledge of potential partners, who still are too often overlooked, in our common effort to build a peaceful Afghanistan. Thomas Ruttig’s profound knowledge of this country is necessary in order for the reader not to get lost amidst a political landscape that too often is confusing, for veteran and as well as new observers of Afghanistan. -
Broken, but Not Defeated an Examination of State-Led Operations Against Islamic State Khorasan in Afghanistan and Pakistan (2015-2018)
BROKEN, BUT NOT DEFEATED AN EXAMINATION OF STATE-LED OPERATIONS AGAINST ISLAMIC STATE KHORASAN IN AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN (2015-2018) Amira Jadoon and Andrew Mines | March 2020 Broken, but Not Defeated: An Examination of State-led Operations against Islamic State Khorasan in Afghanistan and Pakistan (2015-2018) Amira Jadoon Andrew Mines Combating Terrorism Center at West Point United States Military Academy www.ctc.usma.edu The views expressed in this report are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect those of the Combating Terrorism Center, United States Military Academy, Department of Defense, or U.S. Government. March 2020 Cover Photo: An ISK militant shown in a video, “Answer the Call 2,” released by ISK in August 2018 COMBATING TERRORISM CENTER acknowledgments Director We are deeply grateful to the Carnegie Corporation of New York, whose generous support made this report possible. We would also like to thank Brian Dodwell various individuals whose assistance and dedication was critical to the completion of this project. Research Director We are thankful to all members of the research team whose efforts con- Dr. Daniel Milton tributed toward the compilation of the data that underpins this report and helped push this project to completion. External reviewers Asfandyar Mir Distinguished Chair and Craig Whiteside provided invaluable feedback that strengthened this LTG (Ret) Dell Dailey report’s overall contribution. We would like to thank CTC Director Brian Dodwell and CTC Research Director Daniel Milton for their enthusiasm George H. GIlmore Senior Fellow and support for this project, and Don Rassler, Darren Hagan, and Na- kissa Jahanbani for their feedback throughout the report’s development. -
The Durability of Constitutional Solutions to Religious Conflicts in Divided Societies: Lessons from the Constitutional History of Afghanistan
The Durability of Constitutional Solutions to Religious Conflicts in Divided Societies: Lessons from the Constitutional History of Afghanistan Shamshad Pasarlay & Mohammad Qadamshah1 This Article explores constitutional solutions to the conflict over defining the role of Islam and the sharia in Afghanistan’s many constitutions. It focuses on the durability of particular religious constitutional arrangements that survived the replacement of a constitutional text. The Article explains how constitutional provisions that define the role of religion (Islam) in Afghan constitutions have endured through various iterations of the formal constitutional text. Building on recent work by Asli Bâli and Hana Lerner, we argue that constitutional solutions to designating the role of Islam in Afghanistan have survived, because they were implicitly deferred from the constitutional arena to the ordinary political process, a deferred order that appeared difficult to reverse. We also draw on scholarship that describes “constitutional stickiness.” We highlight that constitutional solutions to the conflict over the role of Islam and the sharia have frequently “stuck” during constitutional makeovers—although at times arbitrarily—illustrating the endurance of constitutional provisions defining the role of Islam and the sharia. This Article offers two major contributions. First, it provides a complete and theoretically informed history of constitutional solutions to the challenge of designating the role of Islam and the sharia in Afghanistan’s many constitutions. Second, it adds a crucial case study to the literature on constitutional survival, specifically to the underdeveloped scholarship on the durability of constitutional solutions to religious conflicts in religiously divided societies. 1 Shamshad Pasarlay is Assistant Professor of law, Herat University.