Archaeological Desk Based Assessment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ARCHAEOLOGICAL DESK BASED ASSESSMENT Proposed Sustainable Urban Extension HILLBOROUGH, HERNE BAY, KENT NGR: 620215 167564 Report for Kitewood Estates SWAT. ARCHAEOLOGY Swale and Thames Archaeological Survey Company School Farm Oast, Graveney Road Faversham, Kent ME13 8UP Tel; 01975 532548 or 07885 700 112 Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment in Advance of Development at Hillborough, Herne Bay, Kent Summary Swale & Thames Survey Company (SWAT) has been commissioned to carry out an archaeological desk- based assessment of a proposed development at Hillborough, Herne Bay, Kent. The site is located within an area of high archaeological potential associated with the prehistoric periods, in particular potential Bronze Age and Iron Age settlements with strong domestic, industrial economic, political and religious functions. This evidence is reviewed and it is recommended in this case that further archaeological assessment will be required and that an archaeological field evaluation comprising trial trenching should be carried out. This will provide an additional assessment of the nature, depth and level of survival of any archaeological deposits present within the extents of the site and used to inform further mitigation as necessary. i Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment in Advance of Development at Hillborough, Herne Bay, Kent Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................... 5 2 SITE LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHY AND GEOLOGY .................................................................................. 6 2.1 SITE LOCATION .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3 GEOLOGY ................................................................................................................................................. 6 3 AIMS AND OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................................... 7 OVERALL OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................................ 7 3.2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL STANDARDS AND GUIDANCE (INSTITUTE OF FIELD ARCHAEOLOGISTS 1999) ................................ 7 4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL LEGISLATION............................................................................. 8 4.1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 8 4.2 LISTED BUILDING ....................................................................................................................................... 8 4.3 THE REGISTER OF PARKS & GARDEN ............................................................................................................. 8 4.4 CONSERVATION AREAS ............................................................................................................................... 8 4.5 WORLD HERITAGE SITES ............................................................................................................................. 8 4.6 HISTORIC BATTLEFIELDS .............................................................................................................................. 8 4.7 SCHEDULED ANCIENT MONUMENTS .............................................................................................................. 8 4.8 PLANNING POLICY GUIDELINE 16: ARCHAEOLOGY AND PLANNING (PPG 16)........................................................ 9 5 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................... 10 5.1 SOURCES ............................................................................................................................................... 10 6 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF HILLBOROUGH .......................................... 11 6.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 11 6.2 PALAEOLITHIC AND MESOLITHIC PERIODS ..................................................................................................... 11 6.3 LATER PREHISTORY .................................................................................................................................. 12 6.4 LATE IRON AGE & ROMANO-BRITISH PERIOD (DATE) ..................................................................................... 24 6.5 ANGLO-SAXON, MEDIEVAL AND POST-MEDIEVAL PERIODS (DATE) ................................................................... 27 7 KENT HISTORIC ENVIRONMENTAL REGISTERS AND PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS 29 7.1 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL HISTORIC ENVIRONMENT REGISTER (KHER) ................................................................ 29 7.2 PREVIOUS ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS WITHIN THE STUDY AREA ................................................................ 29 8 CARTOGRAPHIC SOURCES AND MAP REGRESSION .......................................................................... 29 ii Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment in Advance of Development at Hillborough, Herne Bay, Kent 9 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHIC ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................. 30 9.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 30 9.2 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 1946, F/20 4028/4029 ................................................................................. 30 9.3 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 1961, RUN 9 1655 ......................................................................................... 30 9.4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 1967, RUN 9 1655 ......................................................................................... 30 9.5 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 1985, LINE 47 51-53 ...................................................................................... 31 9.6 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 1990, LINE 10 132-134 .................................................................................. 31 9.7 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 1995, RUN 13 8903-8904 .............................................................................. 31 9.8 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH DATED 1999, LINE 7 6541 ......................................................................................... 31 9 SUMMARY OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL POTENTIAL .................................................................................. 31 9.1 PALAEOLITHIC AND MESOLITHIC ................................................................................................................. 31 9.2 NEOLITHIC AND BRONZE AGE ..................................................................................................................... 31 9.3 IRON AGE .............................................................................................................................................. 31 9.3 ROMAN ................................................................................................................................................. 32 9.4 ANGLO-SAXON PERIOD ............................................................................................................................ 32 9.5 MEDIEVAL PERIOD ................................................................................................................................... 32 9.6 POST-MEDIEVAL PERIOD .......................................................................................................................... 32 10 ARCHAEOLOGICAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................ 32 10.1 EXISTING IMPACTS ................................................................................................................................... 32 10.2 PROPOSED IMPACTS ................................................................................................................................. 32 11 MITIGATION ..................................................................................................................................... 33 12 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS................................................................................................................. 33 12.1 ARCHIVE ................................................................................................................................................ 33 12.2 RELIABILITY/LIMITATIONS OF SOURCES ......................................................................................................... 33 12.3 COPYRIGHT ............................................................................................................................................ 33 13 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................... 34 BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................................................... 34 CARTOGRAPHIC REFERENCES (CENTRE FOR KENTISH STUDIES, MAIDSTONE)..................................................................