DOCSLIB.ORG

Odense Fjord, Water Management Plan Provisional Management Plan Pursuant to the EU Water Framework Directive

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Odense Fjord, Water Management Plan Provisional Management Plan Pursuant to the EU Water Framework Directive "%2.%4#!4#( Network on the implementation of EU Water Framework Directive in the Baltic Sea Catchment BERNET CATCH Regional Report: Odense Fjord, Water Management Plan Provisional Management Plan pursuant to the EU Water Framework Directive January 2006 Project part-fi nanced This project has received European by the European Union Regional Development Funding through the INTERREG III B &YN#OUNTY Community Initiative Title: BERNET: Odense Fjord, Water Management Plan, Provisional Management Plan pursuant to the Water Framework Directive. Publisher: Fyn County Nature Management and Water Environment Division Environmental and Land Use Management Division DK - Ørbækvej 100 5220 Odense SØ Telephone: +45 6556 1000 +45 6556 1505 Email: [email protected] Website: www.Bernet.org Editors: Stig Eggert Pedersen, Nanna Rask, Rikke Clausen, Morten Sørensen, Jørgen Windolf, Peter Wiberg-Larsen, Mikael Hjorth Jensen. Layout: Inge Møllegaard Kari Bach Nielsen Birte Vindt Maps: Copyright KMS National Survey and Cadastre 1992/KC.86.1023 Year of publication: January 2006 Printed by: Fyns Amt ISBN: 87-7343-635-6 BERNET - Odense Fjord, Water Management Plan Table of contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 4 1. Description of the geographical area .................................................................. 6 1.1 Odense Fjord .........................................................................................................6 1.2 Running waters and lakes ......................................................................................7 1.3 Groundwater .........................................................................................................7 1.4 The catchment .......................................................................................................8 2. Pressures and risk analysis .................................................................................... 12 2.1 Pressures ...........................................................................................................12 2.2 Risk analysis, the fjord ........................................................................................ 16 2.3 Risk analysis, running waters and lakes ............................................................. 18 2.4 Risk analysis, groundwater ................................................................................. 19 3. Protected areas ........................................................................................................... 20 3.1 Surface waters and wetlands ................................................................................20 3.2 Groundwater .......................................................................................................21 4. Provisional environmental objectives ............................................................... 22 4.1 The fjord ...........................................................................................................22 4.2 Running waters and lakes ....................................................................................23 4.3 Groundwater .......................................................................................................23 5. Programme of measures ........................................................................................ 24 5.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................24 5.2 Coastal waters .....................................................................................................26 5.3 Running waters (In preparation) .........................................................................32 5.4 Groundwater (In preparation) .............................................................................32 5.5 Lakes (In preparation) .........................................................................................32 5.6 Wetlands (In preparation) ....................................................................................32 6. Monitoring programme ......................................................................................... 34 6.1 Coastal waters .....................................................................................................34 6.2 Running waters ...................................................................................................34 6.3 Lakes ...........................................................................................................35 6.4 Pressures on surface waters ................................................................................. 36 6.5 Groundwater .......................................................................................................36 7. Public Participation ................................................................................................. 38 7.1 Who was involved and when? ............................................................................. 38 7.2 What comments have the Water Authority received? ........................................ 38 8. References .........................................................................................42 9. Appendices .........................................................................................44 9.1 Basis for the selection of the EU habitat sites in Odense River Basin (habitats and species) ...........................................................................................................44 9.2 EC Bird Protection sites in the Odense River Basin ...........................................46 BERNET - Odense Fjord, Water Management Plan 3 Introduction Introduction This Water Management Plan “Odense Fjord, details including all waters and all relevant pres- Water Management Plan, Provisional Management sures within the pilot river basin. Plan pursuant to the Water Framework Directive”, A fully management plan of “Odense Pilot is a part of the BERNET CATCH project. River Basin” will be elaborated in connection BERNET is a network co-operation between with the LIFE-founded project “Odense PRB- seven regions from seven countries around the AgriPom-Agricultural Programme of Measures”, Baltic Sea. BERNET CATCH focuses on the which ends summer 2007. integrated management of catchments and the The program of measures is a central part of a regional implementation of the EU Water Frame- management plan. Such programs tell what to do work Directive (WFD). Through the activities to assure “good ecological quality” in every part in BERNET CATCH, the partners wish to pre- of the aquatic environment in the river basin by pare the regional implementation of the WFD, 2015. I.e. how to reduce outlets of nutrients from and evaluate the different regional solutions to point sources and diffuse sources. the implementation of the WFD. In BERNET The aim of the Water Framework Directive is CATCH every partner has to make a provisional to assure good ecological quality in all parts of Water Management Plan for a pilot river basin. the aquatic environment by 2015. This aim has to The basis of this management plan is a result of be fulfi lled through the making and implementa- the following activities/products: tion of Water Management Plans. The program of measures presented in this • Article 5 reporting (Odense Pilot River Basin management plan is only focusing on the manage- - Provisional Article 5 Report pursuant to ment of eutrophication problems related Odense the water framework directive, Fyn County Fjord, and includes thus programs of measures November 2003) regarding outlets of sewage from households and • Reporting on program of measures (coastal industries, and outlets from agricultural activi- waters, lakes, watercourses, groundwater’s, ties. Specifi c measures related lakes, groundwa- and nature (wetlands)) including economy of ters, rivers and wetlands are not included yet. measures The making of programmes of measures is an • Monitoring program according to WFD iterative process illustrated in fi gure 1.1, involv- • Involvement of public stakeholders ing stakeholders and political decisions. The programme of measures related Odense This management plan is mainly focuss- Fjord is one of many programmes of measures ing Odense Fjord, and do not fully present an for all the waters within Odense Pilot River integrated Water Management Plan including basin. These waters enter all together the Odense all waters (watercourses, coastal waters, lakes, Pilot River Basin Water Management Plan. Pro- ground waters and wetlands) in the pilot river grammes of measures regarding rivers, lakes basin. The BERNET resources and timetables do and groundwater within Odense Pilot River not fi t the making of a fully management plan in Basin are also included in this reporting. These programs of measures are at the moment made individually for each type of water, and the pro- Figure 1.1 Programme of Measures grams are not balanced against each other. Some Making programmes of the measures targeted Odense Fjord, will also of measures – Decision Decision Diagram diagram. enhance the protection of groundwater’s, lakes Reference and rivers. Vice versa there will be measures tar- Environmental Objectives Conditions Economy ok? geted the protection off rivers, lakes and ground- Environmental water’s, which affect the protection of Odense State Max. acceptable Fjord. Therefore the fi nal Odense Pilot River loading/pressure Basin Water Management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Odense – a City with Water Issues Urban Hydrology Involves Many Different Aspects
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Available online at www.sciencedirect.com 2 Laursen et al./ Procedia Engineering 00 (2017) 000–000 Procedia Engineering 00 (2017) 000–000 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia ScienceDirect underground specialists on one side and the surface planners, decision makers and politicians on the other. There is a strong need 2for positive interaction and sharing of knowledgeLaursen et al./ between Procedia all Engineering involved parties. 00 (2017) It is000–000 important to acknowledge the given natural Procedia Engineering 209 (2017) 104–118 conditions and work closely together to develop a smarter city, preventing one solution causing even greater problems for other parties. underground specialists on one side and the surface planners, decision makers and politicians on the other. There is a strong need forKeyword positive: Abstraction; interaction groundwater; and sharing climate of knowledge change; city between planning; all exponential involved parties.growth; excessiveIt is important water to acknowledge the given natural Urban Subsurface Planning and Management Week, SUB-URBAN 2017, 13-16 March 2017, conditions and work closely together to develop a smarter city, preventing one solution causing even greater problems for other parties. Bucharest, Romania Keyword1. Introduction: Abstraction; and groundwater; background climate change; city planning; exponential growth; excessive water Odense – A City with Water Issues Urban hydrology involves many different aspects. In our daily work as geologists at the municipality and the local water1. Introduction supply, it isand rather background difficult to “force” city planners, decision makers and politicians to draw attention to “the a b* Underground”. Gert Laursen and Johan Linderberg RegardingUrban hydrology the translation involves many and differentcommunication aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Community by Producing Honk! Jr., a Musical Based on the Glu Y Duckling Heidi Louise Jensen
    University of Northern Colorado Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC Theses Student Research 5-1-2013 Two hundred year old lesson in bullying: building community by producing Honk! Jr., a musical based on The glU y Duckling Heidi Louise Jensen Follow this and additional works at: http://digscholarship.unco.edu/theses Recommended Citation Jensen, Heidi Louise, "Two hundred year old lesson in bullying: building community by producing Honk! Jr., a musical based on The Ugly Duckling" (2013). Theses. Paper 38. This Text is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship & Creative Works @ Digital UNC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © 2013 HEIDI LOUISE JENSEN ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO Greeley, Colorado The Graduate School A TWO HUNDRED YEAR OLD LESSON IN BULLYING: BUILDING COMMUNITY BY PRODUCING HONK! JR., A MUSICAL BASED ON “THE UGLY DUCKLING” A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Heidi Louise Jensen College of Performing and Visual Arts School of Theatre Arts and Dance Theatre Education May 2013 This Thesis by: Heidi Louise Jensen Entitled: A Two Hundred Year Old Lesson in Bullying: Building Community by Producing HONK! Jr., A Musical Based on “The Ugly Duckling”. has been approved as meeting the requirement for the Degree of Master of Arts in College of Performing and Visual Arts in School of Theatre and Dance, Program of Theatre Educator Intensive Accepted by the Thesis Committee _______________________________________________________ Gillian McNally, Associate Professor, M.F.A., Chair, Advisor _______________________________________________________ Mary J.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of the Environment in Denmark, 2001 National
    The aquatic environment The water resource in Denmark is generally suffi cient, but the groundwater is threatened by nitrate and pesticides in some areas. Nutrient loading of the aquatic environment has decreased markedly over the past 10–15 years, but the environmental state of many water bodies is still poor. Hazardous substances 3are increasingly being detected in the aquatic environment. Photo: NERI/Jens Skriver 3.1 Introduction abstracted. After periods of dry years, Physical destruction some watercourses can consequently of water bodies Pressure on the aquatic environment dry out temporarily due to excessive Watercourses have been altered by so- is generally related to three factors: abstraction. cietal development – especially agri- Part of Denmark’s groundwater is cultural. Fields have been extensively • Water resources and excessive water unsuitable as a source of drinking water drained, and many watercourses have abstraction due to contamination with pesticides, been channelized and culverted. More- • Physical destruction of water bodies, nitrate and other substances. If the over, weed clearance has been carried e.g. channelization of watercourses, future drinking water supply is to be out in the watercourses to ensure that drainage of river valleys and recla- safeguarded, we must prevent further the water can fl ow away freely. With mation of lakes and closed fjords contamination and economize on the 90% of the formerly natural water- • Discharge of pollutants, including remaining pure groundwater. courses, this physical intervention has nutrients and hazardous substances. Figure 3.1.1 Water resources Conceptual diagram illustrating the relationship between water consumption and water resources. For exploitation of the groundwater The percentages indicate the share of total water consumption (average 1996–2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Oplev Fyn Med Bussen!
    BUSSER I ODENSE BUSES IN ODENSE 10H 10H 81 82 83 51 Odense 52 53 Havnebad 151 152 153 885 OPLEV FYN 91 122 10H 130 61 10H 131 OBC Nord 51 195 62 61 52 140 191 110 130 140 161 191 885 MED BUSSEN! 62 53 141 111 131 141 162 195 3 110 151 44 122 885 111 152 153 161 195 122 Byens Bro 162 130 EXPLORE FUNEN BY BUS! 131 141 T h . 91 OBC Syd B 10H Østergade . Hans Mules 21 10 29 61 51 T 62 52 h 22 21 31 r 53 i 23 22 32 81 g 31 151 e 82 24 23 41 152 s 32 24 83 153 G Rugårdsvej 42 885 29 Østre Stationsvej 91 a Klostervej d Gade 91 e 1 Vindegade 10H 2 Nørregade e Vestre Stationsvej ad Kongensgade 10C 51 eg 41 21 d 10C Overgade 31 52 in Nedergade 42 22 151 V 32 81 23 152 24 41 Dronningensgade 5 82 42 83 61 10C 51 91 62 52 31 110 161 53 Vestergade 162 32 Albanigade 111 41 151 42 152 153 10C 81 10C 51 Ma 52 geløs n 82 31 e 83 151 Vesterbro k 32 k 152 21 61 91 4a rb 22 62 te s 23 161 sofgangen lo 24 Filo K 162 10C 110 111 Søndergade Hjallesevej Falen Munke Mose Odense Å Assistens April 2021 Kirkegård Læsøegade Falen Sdr. Boulevard Odense Havnebad Der er fri adgang til havnebadet indenfor normal åbningstid. Se åbnings- Heden tider på odense-idraetspark.dk/faciliteter/odense-havnebad 31 51 32 52 PLANLÆG DIN REJSE 53 Odense Havnebad 151 152 Access is free to the harbour bath during normal opening hours.
    [Show full text]
  • Rønninge - Birkende - 491 Langeskov
    RØNNINGE - BIRKENDE - 491 LANGESKOV Gyldig pr. 9. ugust 2021 491 HVERDAG Rønninge - Birkende - Langeskov Rønninge KirkeVesterskovvej Røjrupvej Langeskov RådhusLangeskov StationNonnebovej Bispehaven Tave Bonden Risvænget Hvileholmsvej Birkevej Langeskov Kro Kastanievej Materielgården Langeskov StationBha. MælkevejenLangeskov RådhusLangeskov Skole, afd. Bakken 07.11 07.13 07.15 07.17 07.19 07.22 07.24 07.24 07.26 07.28 07.30 07.34 07.36 07.36 07.39 07.41 07.43 07.46 Bemærk kører ikke: 18.-22. oktober 2021 22. december - 4. januar 2022 14.-18. februar 2022 11.- 13. april 2022 27. maj 2022 27. juni - 5. august 2022 Rønninge - Birkende - Langeskov Bha. MælkevejenLangeskov RådhusLangeskov Skole,Åvej afd. Bakken Rønninge Kirke Vesterskovvej Industrivej / RøjrupvejLangeskov RådhusLangeskov StationLangeskov Kro Kastanievej Birkevej Hvileholmsvej Hans TausensgadeTave Bonden Birkende / OdensevejNonnebovej Engvej Langeskov StationLangeskov Rådhus 13.52 14.2913.53 13.56 14.00 14.01 14.03 14.05 14.07 14.08 14.10 14.11 14.14 14.15 14.17 14.19 14.21 14.22 14.23 14.26 14.29 14.52 14.53 14.56 15.00 15.01 15.03 15.05 15.07 15.08 15.10 15.11 15.14 15.15 15.17 15.19 15.21 15.22 15.23 15.26 15.29 Bemærk kører ikke: 18.-22. oktober 2021 Det er muligt at benytte rute 490 og rute 491 til / fra Langeskov Bibliotek 22. december - 4. januar 2022 (Langeskov Skole, afd. Bakken) 14.-18. februar 2022 11.- 13. april 2022 27. maj 2022 27. juni - 5. august 2022 Korshavn Agernæs Nordskov Langø 43 Snave Roerslev Stubberup Uggerslev Hersnap Gabet Dalby Midskov Mesinge Salby Måle Viby 44 41 Bregnør Tårup Lindø Drigstrup Munkebo Allesø Kerteminde Lille Viby Næsbyhoved Kertinge 42 Broby 5 150 Ladby Kølstrup Revninge Fiskerhuse 49 Tarup Holev Hundslev Skovhuse Pårup Bækskov Rynkeby Marslev Bolbro 195 Vejruplund Urup 920 45 Elmelund 490 Birkende Marslev Hvileholm Dalum St.by Nonnebo Højme Ullerslev Langeskov 491 195 920 Rønninge Skt.
    [Show full text]
  • Munkebo Kirke Bjerge Herred
    4125 Fig. 1. Kirken set fra sydøst. Foto Arnold Mikkelsen 2016. – The church seen from the south east. MUNKEBO KIRKE BJERGE HERRED Munkebo optræder to gange i Kong Valdemars Jor- Kirken er tidligst omtalt 1392, da et afladsbrev ud- debog 1231 (hhv. »Munkæbothæ« og »Munkæboth«).1 stedtes.7 Præsteembedet tilhørte i 1400-tallet et kan- Om oprindelsen til stednavnet med betydningen nikkepræbende, og gudstjeneste må følgelig være for- ‘munkenes boder’ er fremsat forskellige hypoteser.2 rettet af en vikar. Således nævnes Knud Foged 1468 Mens intet indikerer eksistensen af et klostersamfund, som ‘kannik i Århus og præst i Munkebo’.8 Senere (jf. kan lokaliteten have taget navn efter boder tilhørende †monstransskab) tilhørte embedet hans formodede Odensedomkirkens benediktinermunke.3 Placeringen slægtning, Otto Hansen Foged, der 1477-88 nævnes på tangen mellem Odense Fjord og Kertinge Nor har som kannik ved Odense Skt. Knuds Kirke, hvor han må gjort stedet velegnet til såvel fiskeri4 som til ladeplads, være tildelt et kanonikat efter domkapitlets verdslig- og Munkebo har i ældre middelalder antagelig funge- gørelse 1474 (jf. s. 76-77).9 Munkebo præstegård blev ret som sådan, beskyttet mod øst af en pælespærring på som kapitelgods forlenet af Frederik I til enken Mette tværs af fjordløbet ved Snekkeled.5 Ved anlæggelsen af Skinkel,10 måske 1527 sammen med en del af Møn- Kerteminde o. 1300 (jf. s. 1913), købstadens privilegier tergårdens tilliggende gods.11 En trætte herom mellem 1413 og den efterfølgende spærring af indsejlingen hende og sognepræsten, Knud Henningsen, blev 1538 til noret med en fast bro må handelsaktiviteterne ved løst, således at præsteembedet i Mette Skinkels levetid Munkebo være reduceret kraftigt.6 fik udlagt en anden gård tilhørende kirken.12 4126 BJERGE HERRED Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Viking-Age Sailing Routes of the Western Baltic Sea – a Matter of Safety1 by Jens Ulriksen
    Viking-Age sailing routes of the western Baltic Sea – a matter of safety1 by Jens Ulriksen Included in the Old English Orosius, com- weather conditions, currents, shifting sand piled at the court of King Alfred the Great of bars on the sea fl oor and coastal morphol- Wessex around 890,2 are the descriptions of ogy. Being able to cope with the elements of two diff erent late 9th-century Scandinavian nature is important for a safe journey, but sailing routes. Th ese originate from Ohthere, equally important – not least when travelling who sailed from his home in Hålogaland in like Ohthere – is a guarantee of safety for northern Norway to Hedeby, and Wulfstan, ship and crew when coming ashore. Callmer probably an Englishman,3 who travelled suggests convoying as a form of self-protec- from Hedeby to Truso. Th e descriptions are tion, but at the end of the day it would be not detailed to any degree concerning way- vital to negotiate a safe passage with “supra- points or anchorages, and in spite of the fact regional or regional lords”.7 Th ey controlled that lands passed are mentioned in both ac- the landing sites that punctuate Callmer’s counts, the information provided is some- route as stepping-stones. times unclear or confusing. For example, In consequence of the latter, Callmer departing from Hålogaland, Ohthere refers focuses on settlement patterns in order to to both Ireland and England on his starboard identify political and military centres – cen- side even though he obviously has been un- tres with lords who controlled certain areas able to glimpse these lands when sailing of land (and sea) and were able to guaran- along the Norwegian coast.4 Th e same pecu- tee safety within their ‘jurisdiction’.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement of Storm Xaver Over Europe in December 2013: Overview of Energy Impacts and North Sea Events
    Supplement of Adv. Geosci., 54, 137–147, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-54-137-2020-supplement © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Supplement of Storm Xaver over Europe in December 2013: Overview of energy impacts and North Sea events Anthony James Kettle Correspondence to: Anthony James Kettle ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 4.0 License. SECTION I. Supplement figures Figure S1. Wind speed (10 minute average, adjusted to 10 m height) and wind direction on 5 Dec. 2013 at 18:00 GMT for selected station records in the National Climate Data Center (NCDC) database. Figure S2. Maximum significant wave height for the 5–6 Dec. 2013. The data has been compiled from CEFAS-Wavenet (wavenet.cefas.co.uk) for the UK sector, from time series diagrams from the website of the Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrolographie (BSH) for German sites, from time series data from Denmark's Kystdirektoratet website (https://kyst.dk/soeterritoriet/maalinger-og-data/), from RWS (2014) for three Netherlands stations, and from time series diagrams from the MIROS monthly data reports for the Norwegian platforms of Draugen, Ekofisk, Gullfaks, Heidrun, Norne, Ormen Lange, Sleipner, and Troll. Figure S3. Thematic map of energy impacts by Storm Xaver on 5–6 Dec. 2013. The platform identifiers are: BU Buchan Alpha, EK Ekofisk, VA? Valhall, The wind turbine accident letter identifiers are: B blade damage, L lightning strike, T tower collapse, X? 'exploded'. The numbers are the number of customers (households and businesses) without power at some point during the storm.
    [Show full text]
  • Kommuneplan 2013-2025 Kerteminde Kommune
    Kommuneplan 2013-2025 Kerteminde Kommune Hovedstruktur Kerteminde Kommune Miljø- & Kulturforvaltningen Plan & Byg Tlf. 65 15 15 15 www.kerteminde.dk [email protected] KERTEMINDE KOMMUNEPLAN 2013 - 2025 INDHOLD VISION & INDSATSOMRÅDER ............................................................................................................. 7 Vision ........................................................................................................................................................................10 Tilgængelighed ..........................................................................................................................................................16 Klima .........................................................................................................................................................................24 Arkitektur ..................................................................................................................................................................34 BYER & BOSÆTNING .......................................................................................................................... 45 Befolkning og Bolig ....................................................................................................................................................48 Byudvikling ................................................................................................................................................................56 Kerteminde By ...........................................................................................................................................................72
    [Show full text]
  • Fjordens Dag 2010
    Forside 2 Velkommen til Fjordens Dag Indhold Enebærodde – særegen natur Cykeltur Fjorden Rundt 4 Gå på opdagelse i Fyns største sammen- Fiskekonkurrence Fjorden Rundt 5 hængende hedeområde, beliggende Handicapvurdering 5 mellem Kattegat og Odense Fjord. Oplev Kajaktur Fjorden Rundt 4 den fredede odde til fods, på cykel, eller Naturtelte 9, 14, 25 med hestevogn. Oversigtskort 3 Sejlads 29 Børnehavens Natursted Særbusser 30-31 Nær Enebæroddes P-plads er der lege- muligheder og bålmad. Aktivitetssteder Boels Bro / Munkebo 19-21 Hasmark Strand Bregnør Fiskeleje 21 Maleriudstilling i Galleri ”Digehuset”. Egensedybet / Bogø 8 Enebærodde 6-7 Egensedybet / Bogø Hasmark Strand 7 Egensedybets Sejlbådehavn er en lille Havnegade 16 hyggelig havn 6 km fra Otterup By, med Kerteminde 25-26 en enestående udsigt over fjorden. Klintebjerg 9-12 Lodshuset / Gabet 22-24 Klintebjerg – masser af aktivitet Seden Strandby 17-18 Den hyggelige, gamle havn i Klintebjerg Stige Ø 14-15 er med hjælp fra Klintebjerg Efterskole ble- Vigelsø 13 vet ramme om et af vores største aktivitets- steder. Herfra kan du også sejle til Vigelsø. Vigelsø – naturperlen i fjorden Odense Fjords Naturskole ligger på den- ne fredelige og smukke ø, der er et af Fyns vigtigste naturområder. Stige Ø – fra losseplads til tumleplads Tæt på byen og midt i naturen ligger Odenses mest unikke rekreative område Redaktion: Allan Iversen, med en speciel fortid som affaldsplads. Rasmus S. Larsen Fjorden Rundt i kajak Forside: Birgitte Pliniussen - er blot et af flere tilbud, der omfatter hele fjorden (se side 4-5). Layout: Rasmus S. Larsen Havnegade Fotos: Korsløkke Her finder du bl.a. Fynsværket og H.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Udviklingsplan for Birkende 2020
    UDVIKLINGSPLAN FOR BIRKENDE 2020 Birkende er et levende og aktivt samfund med et stærkt fællesskab og med en god infrastruktur med nærhed til det meste. Indhold 1. Sammendrag............................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Indledning ................................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Vision for Birkende ................................................................................................................................... 5 4. Karakteristik af Birkende .......................................................................................................................... 6 5. Bosætning ................................................................................................................................................ 7 5.1 Beskrivelse af bosætningsområderne ................................................................................................. 7 5.2 Udvikling i bosætning, herunder nye byggegrunde m.v. ..................................................................... 7 5.3 Argumenter for bosætning i Birkende ................................................................................................ 8 6. Trafik ....................................................................................................................................................... 9 6.1 Betjening med offentlig transport .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MST Miljøstyrelsens Hovedpostkasse Subject: Høring Revideret Vejledning Bkg
    From: Bo Håkansson Sent: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 08:34:36 +0000 To: MST Miljøstyrelsens hovedpostkasse Subject: Høring revideret vejledning bkg. Nr. 1995 af 6. december 2018 udpegning og administration af internationale naturbeskyttelsesområder & beskyttelse af visse arter (MST-821-00402) Miljøstyrelsen Danmarks Naturfredningsforening fremsender her kommentarer til udkastet til revideret vejledning. Venlig hilsen Bo Bo Håkansson, Biolog og naturmedarbejder EU naturbeskyttelse – Jagt og vildtforvaltning, artsbeskyttelse Medlem af IUCN Danmark Sekretær for Det Grønne Kontaktudvalg ..................................................... Danmarks Naturfredningsforening Masnedøgade 20, 2100 København Ø Tlf.: 39 17 40 00 Dir.tlf.: 22 27 51 57 mail: [email protected] ..................................................... Vi ta'r naturens parti. Støt og meld dig ind på her Dato: 14. oktober Til: Miljøstyrelsen [email protected] Masnedøgade 20 2100 København Ø Telefon: 39 17 40 00 Mail: [email protected] Høring af udkast til revideret vejledning til bkg. Nr. 1995 af 6. december 2018 om udpegning og administration af internationale naturbeskyttelses- områder samt beskyttelse af visse arter (MST-821-00402) Danmarks Naturfredningsforening fremsender her kommentarer til udkastet til revideret vej- ledning. Konsekvensvurdering er krævet selvom den relevante bestemmelse måtte mangle i bekendtgørelsen Det er vigtigt at være opmærksom på, at vejledningen også har relevans i forhold til de situati- oner, hvor der ikke er en lovregel herom. Det fremgår af den gældende vejledning i §-gen- nemgangen, jf. Side 55 (ad § 8-9). I udkastets afsnit ”Indledning” (side 6) er dette omtalt men §-gennemgangen er udeladt i udkast til revideret vejledning. Vi anbefaler at man opretholder afsnittet med §-gennemgangen og også i dette afsnit omtaler at der er en pligt til at sikre en konsekvensvurdering, selvom den relevante § måtte mangle i bekendtgørelsen.
    [Show full text]