DOCSLIB.ORG

Section 7 Consultation Programmatic Biological Opinion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Section 7 Consultation Programmatic Biological Opinion Endangered Species Act - Section 7 Consultation Programmatic Biological Opinion Addressing Oil and Hazardous Substance Spill/Release Response Activities in Selected Areas of Idaho, Washington, and Oregon U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Reference Number: 01E00000-2015-F-0001 Action Agencies: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 U.S. Coast Guard, 13th Coast Guard District Prepared By: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Interior Region 9 - Columbia-Pacific Northwest _____________________________________________ Marjorie Nelson, Acting Assistant Regional Director Ecological Services ___________________________ Date 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .........................................................................2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................7 Consultation History ................................................................................8 BIOLOGICAL AND CONFERENCE OPINION ...................................12 Description of the Proposed Action ......................................................................... 12 Response Planning Under the Northwest Area Contingency Plan .................... 13 Response Action Command Structure and Coordination .................................. 15 Role of Geographic Response Plans (GRPs) ..................................................... 17 Coordination of Response Activities with the ESA ............................................ 18 Decision Process for Use of Non-Mechanical Countermeasures ..................... 19 Chemical Dispersion .......................................................................................... 20 In Situ Burning ................................................................................................... 21 Emergency Consultation .................................................................................... 22 Summary ............................................................................................................ 23 Description of Response Tools and Methods ..................................................... 24 Protected Species and Habitat in the Action Area ............................................ 35 Description of Habitats within the Action Area ................................................. 36 Conservation Measures ..................................................................................... 40 Term of the Action .............................................................................................. 40 Action Area ........................................................................................................ 40 Analytical Framework for the Jeopardy and Destruction/Adverse Modification of Critical Habitat Determinations ......................................... 41 Jeopardy Determination .................................................................................... 42 Destruction/Adverse Modification Determination ............................................. 43 Potentially-affected Species and Critical Habitat ................................................... 44 Spalding’s Catchfly ................................................................................................... 44 Rangewide Status of the Spalding’s Catchfly .................................................... 44 Status of the Spalding’s Catchfly in the Action Area ......................................... 47 Effects of the Action on the Spalding’s Catchfly ................................................ 48 Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................. 49 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 50 Bliss Rapids Snail ...................................................................................................... 50 Rangewide Status of the Bliss Rapids Snail ....................................................... 50 Status of the Bliss Rapids Snail in the Action Area ........................................... 52 Effects of the Action on the Bliss Rapids Snail .................................................. 53 Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................. 56 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 56 Oregon Spotted Frog ................................................................................................. 57 Rangewide Status of the Oregon Spotted Frog .................................................. 57 Status of the Oregon Spotted Frog in the Action Area ...................................... 57 3 Effects of the Action on the Oregon Spotted Frog ............................................. 61 Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................. 66 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 67 Oregon Spotted Frog Critical Habitat ..................................................................... 67 Rangewide Status of Oregon Spotted Frog Critical Habitat ............................. 67 Status of Oregon Spotted Frog Critical Habitat in the Action Area ................. 68 Effects of the Action on Oregon Spotted Frog Critical Habitat ........................ 68 Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................. 69 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 69 Bull Trout ................................................................................................................... 70 Rangewide Status of the Bull Trout ................................................................... 70 Status of the Bull Trout in the Action Area ........................................................ 71 Effects of the Action on the Bull Trout ............................................................... 82 Cumulative Effects ............................................................................................. 89 Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 91 Bull Trout Critical Habitat ....................................................................................... 91 Rangewide Status of Bull Trout Critical Habitat ............................................... 91 Status of Bull Trout Critical Habitat in the Action Area ................................... 98 Effects of the Action on Bull Trout Critical Habitat ........................................ 101 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................... 104 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 104 Kootenai River White Sturgeon ............................................................................. 105 Rangewide Status of the Kootenai River White Sturgeon ................................ 105 Status of the Kootenai River White Sturgeon in the Action Area .................... 112 Effects of the Action on the Kootenai River White Sturgeon ........................... 117 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................... 119 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 119 Kootenai River White Sturgeon Critical Habitat ................................................. 120 Rangewide Status of the Kootenai River White Sturgeon Critical Habitat ..... 120 Status of the Kootenai River White Sturgeon Critical Habitat in the Action Area ...................................................................................................... 124 Effects of the Action on the Kootenai River White Sturgeon Critical Habitat ................................................................................................. 125 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................... 127 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 127 Marbled Murrelet .................................................................................................... 128 Rangewide Status of the Marbled Murrelet ..................................................... 128 Status of the Marbled Murrelet in the Action Area ......................................... 134 Effects of the Action on the Marbled Murrelet ................................................ 140 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................... 153 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 154 Marbled Murrelet Critical Habitat ....................................................................... 155 Rangewide Status of the Marbled Murrelet Critical Habitat .......................... 155 Status of the Marbled Murrelet Critical Habitat in the Action Area ............... 160 Effects of the Action on the Marbled Murrelet Critical Habitat ...................... 163 Cumulative Effects ........................................................................................... 164
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 12. Owyhee Uplands Section
    12. Owyhee Uplands Section Section Description The Owyhee Uplands Section is part of the Columbia Plateau Ecoregion. The Idaho portion, the subject of this review, comprises southwestern Idaho from the lower Payette River valley in the northwest and the Camas Prairie in the northeast, south through the Hagerman Valley and Salmon Falls Creek Drainage (Fig. 12.1, Fig. 12.2). The Owyhee Uplands spans a 1,200 to 2,561 m (4,000 to 8,402 ft) elevation range. This arid region generally receives 18 to 25 cm (7 to 10 in) of annual precipitation at lower elevations. At higher elevations, precipitation falls predominantly during the winter and often as snow. The Owyhee Uplands has the largest human population of any region in Idaho, concentrated in a portion of the section north of the Snake River—the lower Boise and lower Payette River valleys, generally referred to as the Treasure Valley. This area is characterized by urban and suburban development as well as extensive areas devoted to agricultural production of crops for both human and livestock use. Among the conservation issues in the Owyhee Uplands include the ongoing conversion of agricultural lands to urban and suburban development, which limits wildlife habitat values. In addition, the conversion of grazing land used for ranching to development likewise threatens wildlife habitat. Accordingly, the maintenance of opportunity for economically viable Lower Deep Creek, Owyhee Uplands, Idaho © 2011 Will Whelan ranching operations is an important consideration in protecting open space. The aridity of this region requires water management programs, including water storage, delivery, and regulation for agriculture, commercial, and residential uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Usage by the Page Springsnail, Pyrgulopsis Morrisoni (Gastropoda: Hydrobiidae), from Central Arizona
    THE VELIGER ᭧ CMS, Inc., 2006 The Veliger 48(1):8–16 (June 30, 2006) Habitat Usage by the Page Springsnail, Pyrgulopsis morrisoni (Gastropoda: Hydrobiidae), from Central Arizona MICHAEL A. MARTINEZ* U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2321 W. Royal Palm Rd., Suite 103, Phoenix, Arizona 85021, USA (*Correspondent: mike࿞[email protected]) AND DARRIN M. THOME U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, Rm. W-2605, Sacramento, California 95825, USA Abstract. We measured habitat variables and the occurrence and density of the Page springsnail, Pyrgulopsis mor- risoni (Hershler & Landye, 1988), in the Oak Creek Springs Complex of central Arizona during the spring and summer of 2001. Occurrence and high density of P. morrisoni were associated with gravel and pebble substrates, and absence and low density with silt and sand. Occurrence and high density were also associated with lower levels of dissolved oxygen and low conductivity. Occurrence was further associated with shallower water depths. Water velocity may play an important role in maintaining springsnail habitat by influencing substrate composition and other physico-chemical variables. Our study constitutes the first empirical effort to define P. morrisoni habitat and should be useful in assessing the relative suitability of spring environments for the species. The best approach to manage springsnail habitat is to maintain springs in their natural state. INTRODUCTION & Landye, 1988), is medium-sized relative to other con- geners, 1.8 to 2.9 mm in shell height, endemic to the The role that physico-chemical habitat variables play in Upper Verde River drainage of central Arizona (Williams determining the occurrence and density of aquatic micro- et al., 1985; Hershler & Landye, 1988; Hershler, 1994), invertebrates in spring ecosystems has been poorly stud- with all known populations existing within a complex of ied.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitivity of Freshwater Snails to Aquatic Contaminants: Survival and Growth of Endangered Snail Species and Surrogates in 28-D
    Sensitivity of freshwater snails to aquatic contaminants: Survival and growth of endangered snail species and surrogates in 28-day exposures to copper, ammonia and pentachlorophenol John M. Besser, Douglas L. Hardesty, I. Eugene Greer, and Christopher G. Ingersoll U.S. Geological Survey, Columbia Environmental Research Center, Columbia, Missouri Administrative Report (CERC-8335-FY07-20-10) submitted to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Project Number: 05-TOX-04, Basis 8335C2F, Task 3. Project Officer: Dr. David R. Mount USEPA/ORD/NHEERL Mid-Continent Ecology Division 6201 Congdon Blvd, Duluth, MN 55804 USA April 13, 2009 Abstract – Water quality degradation may be an important factor affecting declining populations of freshwater snails, many of which are listed as endangered or threatened under the U.S. Endangered Species Act. Toxicity data for snails used to develop U.S. national recommended water quality criteria include mainly results of acute tests with pulmonate (air-breathing) snails, rather than the non-pulmonate snail taxa that are more frequently endangered. Pulmonate pond snails (Lymnaea stagnalis) were obtained from established laboratory cultures and four taxa of non-pulmonate taxa from field collections. Field-collected snails included two endangered species from the Snake River valley of Idaho -- Idaho springsnail (Pyrgulopsis idahoensis; which has since been de-listed) and Bliss Rapids snail (Taylorconcha serpenticola) -- and two non-listed taxa, a pebblesnail (Fluminicola sp.) collected from the Snake River and Ozark springsnail (Fontigens aldrichi) from southern Missouri. Cultures were maintained using simple static-renewal systems, with adults removed periodically from aquaria to allow isolation of neonates for long-term toxicity testing.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-Month Finding on a Petition to Remove the Bliss Rapids Snail
    47536 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 16, 2009 / Proposed Rules (2) The amount of the allotment for (1) The State has submitted to the claimed during a 2-year period of each of the 50 States and the District of Secretary, and has approved by the availability, beginning with the fiscal Columbia, and for each of the Secretary a State plan amendment or year of the final allotment and ending Commonwealths and Territories (not waiver request relating to an expansion with the end of the succeeding fiscal including the additional amount for FY of eligibility for children or benefits year following the fiscal year. 2009 determined under paragraph under title XXI of the Act that becomes Authority: (Section 1102 of the Social (c)(2)(ii) of this section) is equal to the effective for a fiscal year (beginning Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1302) product of: with FY 2010 and ending with FY (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (i) The percentage determined by 2013); and Program No. 93.778, Medical Assistance dividing the amount in paragraph (2) The State has submitted to the Program) (e)(2)(i)(A) by the amount in paragraph Secretary, before the August 31 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (e)(2)(i)(B) of this section. preceding the beginning of the fiscal Program No. 93.767, State Children’s Health (A) The amount of the State allotment year, a request for an expansion Insurance Program)) allotment adjustment under this for each of the 50 States and the District Dated: June 19, 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Unionoida Surveys, Distribution, and Metapopulation Dynamics in the Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage, UT
    Version 1.5 Native Unionoida Surveys, Distribution, and Metapopulation Dynamics in the Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage, UT Report To: Wasatch Front Water Quality Council Salt Lake City, UT By: David C. Richards, Ph.D. OreoHelix Consulting Vineyard, UT 84058 email: [email protected] phone: 406.580.7816 May 26, 2017 Native Unionoida Surveys and Metapopulation Dynamics Jordan River-Utah Lake Drainage 1 One of the few remaining live adult Anodonta found lying on the surface of what was mostly comprised of thousands of invasive Asian clams, Corbicula, in Currant Creek, a former tributary to Utah Lake, August 2016. Summary North America supports the richest diversity of freshwater mollusks on the planet. Although the western USA is relatively mollusk depauperate, the one exception is the historically rich molluskan fauna of the Bonneville Basin area, including waters that enter terminal Great Salt Lake and in particular those waters in the Jordan River-Utah Lake drainage. These mollusk taxa serve vital ecosystem functions and are truly a Utah natural heritage. Unfortunately, freshwater mollusks are also the most imperiled animal groups in the world, including those found in UT. The distribution, status, and ecologies of Utah’s freshwater mussels are poorly known, despite this unique and irreplaceable natural heritage and their protection under the Clean Water Act. Very few mussel specific surveys have been conducted in UT which requires specialized training, survey methods, and identification. We conducted the most extensive and intensive survey of native mussels in the Jordan River-Utah Lake drainage to date from 2014 to 2016 using a combination of reconnaissance and qualitative mussel survey methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Northwest Region Invasive Plant Program Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Pacific Northwest Region Invasive Plant Program Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Region States of Oregon and Washington, Including Portions of Del Norte and Siskiyou Counties in California, and Portions of Nez Perce, Salmon, Idaho, and Adams Counties in Idaho Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Responsible Official: Linda Goodman, Regional Forester Pacific Northwest Region 333 SW First Ave. PO Box 3623 Portland, OR 97208 For More Information: IPEIS, Eugene Skrine, Team Leader PO Box 3623 Portland, OR 97208 Ph: (503) 808-2685 Fax: (503) 808-2699 Email: [email protected] www.fs.fed.us/r6/invasiveplant-eis Abstract: The Forest Service proposes to add management direction to all existing National Forest Land and Resource Management Plans in the Pacific Northwest Region (Region Six). This direction would standardize invasive plant prevention, and expand the set of invasive plant treatment tools available for use on National Forests in Region Six. The FEIS considers four alternatives in detail (including No Action). Adoption of the standards in any of the action alternatives would likely reduce the extent and rate of spread of invasive plants across the region, and help prevent new infestations. All of the action alternatives include standards to protect human health and the environment. The Forest Service preferred alternative is the Proposed Action. Preventing and Managing Invasive Plants Final Environmental Impact Statement April 2005 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status.
    [Show full text]
  • Listing Decisions Under the Endangered Species Act: Why Better Science Isn't Always Better Policy
    Washington University Law Review Volume 75 Issue 3 January 1997 Listing Decisions Under the Endangered Species Act: Why Better Science Isn't Always Better Policy Holly Doremus University of California, Berkeley Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Environmental Law Commons, Evidence Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Holly Doremus, Listing Decisions Under the Endangered Species Act: Why Better Science Isn't Always Better Policy, 75 WASH. U. L. Q. 1029 (1997). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol75/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Law Quarterly VOLUME 75 NUMBER 3 1997 ARTICLES LISTING DECISIONS UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: WHY BETTER SCIENCE ISN'T ALWAYS BETTER POLICY HOLLY DOREMUS* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1031 II. DEVELOPMENT OF THE LEGISLATIVE SCIENCE MANDATE .................. 1037 A. Background................................................................................. 1037 1. Ambivalence Toward Science ............................................ 1037 2. The HistoricDominance ofScience
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion for the Idaho Water Quality Standards for Numeric Water Quality Criteria for Toxic Pollutants
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE 911NE11 th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232-4181 In Reply Refer To: FWS/Rl/AES Dan Opalski, Director JUN 2 5 2015 Office of Water and Watersheds U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Sixth A venue Seattle, Washington 98101 Dear Mr. Opalski: Enclosed are the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) Biological Opinion (Opinion) and concurrence determinations on the Idaho Water Quality Standards for Numeric Water Quality Criteria for Toxic Pollutants (proposed action). The Opinion addresses the effects of the proposed action on the following listed species and critical habitats: the endangered Snake River physa snail (Physa natricina), threatened Bliss Rapids snail (Taylorconcha serpenticola), endangered Banbury Springs lanx (Laroe sp.; undescribed), the endangered Bruneau hot springsnail (Pyrgulopsis bruneauensis), the threatened bull trout (Salvelinus confluenlus) and its critical habitat, and the endangered Kootenai River white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) and its critical habitat. The concurrence determinations address the following listed species: the threatened grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis), endangered Southern Selkirk Mountains woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou), threatened Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis), threatened northern Idaho ground squirrel (Spermophilus brunneus brunneus), threatened MacFarlane's four-o'clock (Mirabilis macfarlanei), threatened water howellia (Howellia aquatilis), threatened Ute ladies' -tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis),
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Genera of Hydrobiid Snails (Prosobranchia: Rissooidea) from the Northwestern United States
    THE VELIGER © CMS, Inc., 1994 The Veliger 37(3):221-243 (July 1, 1994) Two New Genera of Hydrobiid Snails (Prosobranchia: Rissooidea) from the Northwestern United States by ROBERT HERSHLER Department of Invertebrate Zoology (Mollusks), National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA TERRENCE J. FREST AND EDWARD J. JOHANNES DEIXIS Consultants, 2517 NE65th Street, Seattle, Washington 98115, USA PETER A. BOWLER Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, California 92717, USA AND FRED G. THOMPSON Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA Abstract. Based on morphological study of recently collected material, Bythinella hemphilli, distributed within the lower Snake-Columbia River basin, is transferred to a new genus, Pristinicola; and Tay- lorconcha serpenticola, new genus and new species, a federally listed taxon restricted to a short reach of the Middle Snake River in Idaho and previously known by the common name, Bliss Rapids Snail, is described. These genera do not appear closely related either to one another or to other North American Hydrobiidae. INTRODUCTION known. Perhaps the most significant unresolved question pertaining to the local described fauna involves the status Among the large freshwater molluscan fauna of the United of Bythinella hemphilli. Pilsbry's original placement of this States, prosobranch snails of the family Hydrobiidae com- species in Bythinella, which is otherwise known only from pose one of the most diverse groups, totaling about 170 Europe (Banarescu, 1990:342), has long been questioned, described species. Although the state of knowledge of these and two other generic assignments have been offered.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruneau Hot-Spring Springsnail (Pyrgulopsis Bruneauensis)
    BLM LIBRARY xy-A MONITORING REPOR1 BRUNEAU HOT-SPRING SPRINGSNA (PYRGULOPSIS BRUNEAUENSIS) by Jeffrey T. Varricchione G. Wayne Minshall A mobile home doesn't guarantee a place to live. (The Nature Conservancy) IDAHO BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL BULLETIN NO. 95-14 JUNE 1995 w ...i- ,. "imnTrw— wMmam Itf ^ ANNUAL MONITORING REPORT Bruneau Hot-spring Springsnail (Pyrgulopsis bruneauensis) Jeffrey T. Varricchione and G. Wayne Minshall Stream Ecology Center Department of Biological Sciences Idaho State University Pocatello, Idaho 83209 31 December 1994 Table of Contents List of Figures ii Summary 1 Introduction 1 Results 2 Size Distribution 2 Population Fluctuations 8 Temperature And Water Chemistry Fluctuations 11 Periphyton Levels 13 Conditions At Indian Bathtub And Hot Creek 16 Acknowledgements 19 Literature Cited 20 .. List of Figures Figure la-e. Size histograms for snail populations from the three study sites 3 Figure 2 Snail abundance at the study sites 10 Figure 3 Discharge and maximum temperature at Site 1 (Hot Creek) 12 Figure 4 Maximum/minimum water temperatures at the monitoring sites 14 Figure 5. Water chemistry of the monitoring sites 15 Figure 6. Chlorophyll a of periphyton for the study sites 17 Figure 7 Periphyton biomass (as AFDM) for the study sites 18 ii SUMMARY This report presents the 1994 monitoring results from four sites near the Indian Bathtub that contain populations, of the Bruneau Hot-spring Springsnail {Pyrgulopsls bruneauensis) . Three of these sites were monitored in 1990 and 1991 by Mladenka (1992), in 1992 by Robinson et al. (1992), and in 1993 by Royer and Minshall (1993) . An additional seep at Site 3 was included in the 1994 monitoring efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Biological Assessment for Boise District Noxious Weed and Invasive Plant Management DOI-BLM-ID-B000-2016-0002-EA ESA-Listed Aquatic Invertebrates Bruneau hot springsnail (Pyrgulopsis bruneauensis) ESA-Listed Plants Slickspot peppergrass (Lepidium papilliferum) Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 7 Relationship of the Proposed Action to Future Federal Actions ................................................ 8 Consultation History ................................................................................................................... 9 Relationship of Section 7 Consultation for Future Federal Actions of the Proposed Action ..... 9 Species and Critical Habitats .................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 2 – Proposed Action ........................................................................................................ 13 Targeted Plant Communities..................................................................................................... 13 Noxious Weeds ..................................................................................................................... 13 Invasive Plants .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Capstone Study Invasive Species in Riparian Habitats of Washington
    Capstone Study Invasive Species in Riparian Habitats of Washington: Using Species Distribution Models to Guide Monitoring Efforts Samantha Nicole Smiley Masters of Natural Resources Oregon State University Capstone Project March 5, 2021 Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Objectives ...................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Review of Literature on Select Washington Invasive Species ....................................................................................... 8 Potamopyrgus antipodarum (New Zealand mudsnail) .............................................................................................. 8 Lithobates catesbeianus (American Bullfrog) .......................................................................................................... 11 Cipangopaludina chinensisis (Chinese Mystery Snail) ............................................................................................. 14 Myriophyllum spicatum (Eurasian Watermilfoil) ..................................................................................................... 17 Egeria densa (Brazilian Elodea)...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]