DOCSLIB.ORG

Taxonomic Status of the Colubrid Snake Sibynophis Subpunctatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taxonomic Status of the Colubrid Snake Sibynophis Subpunctatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854) Hamadryad Vol. 28, Nos. 1 & 2, pp. 90 – 94, 2004. Copyright 2004 Centre for Herpetology, Madras Crocodile Bank Trust. TAXONOMIC STATUS OF THE COLUBRID SNAKE SIBYNOPHIS SUBPUNCTATUS (DUMÉRIL, BIBRON & DUMÉRIL, 1854) Ashok Captain1, David J. Gower2, Patrick David3 and Aaron M. Bauer4 13/1 Boat Club Road, Pune 411 001, Maharashtra, India. 2Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK. Email: [email protected] 3Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Evolution et Systématique, UMS 602 - Taxonomie-Collection - Reptiles & Amphibiens, Case Postale N° 30, 25 Rue Cuvier, F-75231 Paris Cedex 05, France. 4Department of Biology, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, U.S.A. ABSTRACT.– There is confusion in the literature regarding the taxonomic status of the colubrid snake Sibynophis subpunctatus (Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854). Originally described from the Western Ghats of India, occasionally S. subpunctatus has been considered a junior synonym of its north-eastern Indian congener S. sagittarius. Our preliminary re-examination of material, including type specimens, is consistent with the view that the two species are morphologically distinct. The two species appear to be geographically disjunct, with S. subpunctatus occuring in Sri Lanka and western peninsular India, and S. sagittarius in North and North East India. A more detailed reassessment is required. KEYWORDS.– Sibynophis, Colubridae, India, Sri Lanka, Western Ghats. INTRODUCTION including Smith (1943) and Taylor (1950) fol- The colubrid snake genus Sibynophis lowed this. Fitzinger, 1843 comprises some nine species In a revision of sibynophiines, Morgan (1973) (Appendix I) distributed in southern and considered Sibynophis subpunctatus a synonym south-eastern Asia. Up to three species are of Sibynophis sagittarius (Cantor, 1839), a spe- known from mainland India, S. collaris, S. cies originally described from Bengal, NE India. subpunctatus,andS. sagittarius (Das, 1994, Morgan (1973: 71) wrote, “Although Wall 1997), though the taxonomy of the latter two is (1907) suggested that Polyodontophis confused. Sibynophis subpunctatus (sensu subpunctatus (= S. subpunctatus), the name ap- Smith, 1943) was first referred to and figured plied to specimens from southern India and Cey- by Seba (1734: plate XI). Jerdon’s (1853: 528) lon, should be considered a synonym of P. mention of “Calamaria sagittaria”inpeninsu- sagittarius (= S. sagittarius), most workers have lar India probably also corresponds to S. continued to follow Boulenger’s arrangement subpunctatus (see Wall 1921: 84). Duméril et recognizing 2 species (e.g. Bourret, 1936; Tay- al. (1854) described Oligodon subpunctatum lor, 1950). In view of the clinal variation exhib- based on a single specimen from “Malabar” in ited in ventral numbers and dorsal coloration, I the Western Ghats region of peninsular India. feel that the recognition of only 1 species is war- Boulenger (1890) transferred the species to his ranted.” new genus Polyodontophis, and this was fol- Wall’s (1907: 824) proposed suppression of lowed by Wall (1907, 1921 and 1923), Prater S. subpunctatus was based on a single specimen (1924) and Fraser (1936-7). Schmidt (1926) with eight supralabials on the left side (with the may have first used the combination fourth and fifth contacting the eye) and nine Sibynophis subpunctatus, and later workers, supralabials on the right (with the fourth, fifth February, 2004] SYSTEMATIC STATUS OF SIBYNOPHIS SUBPUNCTATUS 91 and sixth contacting the eye). Boulenger (1890) the Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris had considered the number of supralabials to be a (MNHN) and The Natural History Museum, key character for distinguishing Polyodontophis London (NHM), respectively. Tooth counts for (now Sibynophis) subpunctatus from P. (= S.) seven specimens are presented in Table 1. Where sagittarius. After sending his specimen to Lon- observations overlap, our counts essentially don for examination, Wall (1907: 824) followed match those given by Wall (1923). Morgan Boulenger’s advice and united the two taxa. (1973: table 33) also presented data on the varia- However, Wall (1923: 599) later changed his tion in the number of maxillary teeth (32 to 48) in view: “Note.- In the Bombay Natural History 22 specimens matching his concept of S. sagit- Journal (Vol. XVII, p 823) I referred to a speci- tarius. The majority (18) of these specimens had men, that appeared to unite the characters of counts of 42 or greater, while two (32 and 35 subpunctatus and sagittarius, and which sug- maxillary teeth) match Wall’s counts for his con- gested the union of the two species under the lat- cept of S. sagittarius. Only two specimens (37 ter and older name. I am now in a position to and 39 maxillary teeth) fall between these values. show that the two species previously held as such Morgan did not explicitly link maxillary tooth are both valid, and that the specimen referred to counts with locality, but there is nothing to sug- is an aberrant subpunctatus. This view is based gest that the specimens with low tooth counts on skulls in my collection. The dentition is as fol- comprised anything other than the few available lows:- subpunctatus. Maxillary 44 to 45. Pala- northern Indian specimens, that can be putatively tine 23 to 24. Pterygoid 21. Mandibular 40. – identified as S. sagittarius. sagittarius. Maxillary 32. Palatine 14 to16. Morgan (1973) also considered variation in Pterygoid 13. Mandibular 30. The specimen re- putative S. subpunctatus and S. sagittarius in ferred to was probably from the Northern part of terms of scalation (numbers of supralabials, the Western Ghats as it was preserved in the infralabials, temporals, ventrals, and subcaudals) same bottle as a Lycodon flavomaculatus, which and coloration, and concluded that only a single has a very limited distribution. (q. v.)” Morgan species should be recognized. The majority (37 (1973) neither referred to Wall’s (1923) of 48) of the specimens examined by Morgan revalidation nor otherwise cited this publication. (1973: table 9) are from Sri Lanka and peninsular Wall’s (1907) earlier proposed synonymy India, and no substantial differences in mean and later (1923) revalidation may have caused ventral scale counts was detected between the some taxonomic instability. For example, Daniel samples from these two areas (contrary to De & Shull (1964: 740) noted that “There appears to Silva, 1969, who proposed Sri Lankan S. be confusion in collection records between this subpunctatus to comprise a distinct subspecies, species and S. sagittarius.” Morgan’s proposed S. s. ceylanicus). Thus, the supposed clinal varia- synonymy has received a varying reception, be- tion in S. sagittatius (sensu Morgan) is unevenly ing both ignored/rejected (though not explicitly distributed across its range, being absent across by e.g. Whitaker, 1978; P. De Silva, 1980; Sri Lanka and peninsular India, but present be- Deoras, 1981; Mahendra, 1984; Murthy, 1985, tween these areas and North/North East India. 1986, 1990; Welch, 1988; A. De Silva, 1990, Importantly, Morgan (1973: 66) noted that 1996, 1998; Das, 1994, 1996; Sharma, 1998, “Analysis of geographic variation in S. sagittar- 2002, 2003; Schleich & Kästle, 2002) and fol- ius is impeded by a low number of specimens lowed (e.g., implicitly by Murthy and Sharma, from the northern areas of the range.” 1978; Das, 1997; Vyas, 2000). Morgan (1973) discussed only maxillary tooth counts, but there are also substantial differ- REASSESSMENT ences in tooth counts for the palatal and mandib- We briefly reassessed Morgan’s proposed syn- ular elements between putative S. subpunctatus onymy by examining material of S. subpunctatus and S. sagittarius (Table 1). Sample sizes remain and S. sagittarius, including the types stored in small, but we consider these differences to be 92 HAMADRYAD [Vol. 28, Nos.1&2, substantial and taxonomically significant. Wall was an avid and insightful counter of teeth, and he considered the differences he observed be- nt missing or tween putative S. subpunctatus and S. sagittarius Mandible to be indicative of separate species. Smith (1943) listed some other differences in the external morphology of these two species, most notably the number of supralabials (seven Pterygoid or eight in S. sagittarius, nine or rarely eight in S. subpunctatus) and anterior temporals (usually one in S. sagittarius, two in S. subpunctatus - where the lower ‘anterior temporal’ is not in con- tact with a postocular). These differences hold Tooth Counts (left/right) true for the type specimens of S. sagitttarius and S. subpunctatus, which have seven and nine supralabials, and one and two anterior (and pos- terior) temporals, respectively, on each side (PD, . Counting was difficult for wet, whole specimens, so that DJG, pers. obs.). In conclusion, we do not find Morgan’s Maxilla Palatine Pterygoid Palatine + (1973) evidence to be sufficient basis for the sup- pression of Sibynophis subpunctatus, and thus S. sagittarius we recognise this species as valid pending a more and detailed reassessment. Sibynophis subpunctatus and S. sagittarius appear to be geographically disjunct, with the former species occurring in Sri d skull 46/44 24/23Lanka 21/21 and western 45/44 peninsular ?/40 India, and the lat- lls are part of Wall’s collection. Abbreviations: - = count not made; ? = eleme ter in central and northeastern India and neigh- bouring countries. Abdulali (1948) reported a aa dried skull dried skull 35/? ?/? 16/16 16/16 18/15 15/13 34/31 31/29 ?/? ?/30 specimen from Ambarnath, near Bombay Sibynophis subpunctatus (Mumbai) at the northern end of the Western Ghats of peninsular India as S. sagittarius. How- ever, examination (by AC and Varad Giri) of the only Ambarnath specimen of Sibynophis in the Bengal wet, whole specimen ~32/32 -/- -/- <30/27 29/>26 “Malabar”no data wet, whole specimen 42/>42? wet, whole specimen -/- 44/47collections -/- -/-of 44/42 the -/- Bombay 37/38 45/44 Natural 41/40 History Soci- ety (BNHS S.1312, deposited by Abdulali in 1956), found its supralabial and temporal scalation to agree with that of the holotype of S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 4 Issue 1B
    Captive & Field Herpetology Volume 4 Issue 1 2020 Volume 4 Issue 1 2020 ISSN - 2515-5725 Published by Captive & Field Herpetology Captive & Field Herpetology Volume 4 Issue1 2020 The Captive and Field Herpetological journal is an open access peer-reviewed online journal which aims to better understand herpetology by publishing observational notes both in and ex-situ. Natural history notes, breeding observations, husbandry notes and literature reviews are all examples of the articles featured within C&F Herpetological journals. Each issue will feature literature or book reviews in an effort to resurface past literature and ignite new research ideas. For upcoming issues we are particularly interested in [but also accept other] articles demonstrating: • Conflict and interactions between herpetofauna and humans, specifically venomous snakes • Herpetofauna behaviour in human-disturbed habitats • Unusual behaviour of captive animals • Predator - prey interactions • Species range expansions • Species documented in new locations • Field reports • Literature reviews of books and scientific literature For submission guidelines visit: www.captiveandfieldherpetology.com Or contact us via: [email protected] Front cover image: Timon lepidus, Portugal 2019, John Benjamin Owens Captive & Field Herpetology Volume 4 Issue1 2020 Editorial Team Editor John Benjamin Owens Bangor University [email protected] [email protected] Reviewers Dr James Hicks Berkshire College of Agriculture [email protected] JP Dunbar
    [Show full text]
  • The Predation of an Adult Colubrid Snake, Sibynophis Triangularis, by the Scorpion Heterometrus Laoticus in the Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve
    Captive & Field Herpetology Volume 4 Issue 1 2020 Inverting the Food Web: The Predation of an Adult Colubrid Snake, Sibynophis triangularis, by the Scorpion Heterometrus laoticus in the Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve Jack Christie1, Everett Madsen1, Surachit Waengsothorn1, Max Dolton Jones1, 2,* 1Sakaerat Environmental Research Station, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. 2Suranree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand. *Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: system they occupy, is a well-researched and understood topic (Belovsky & Slade 1993; The predation of vertebrates by large tropical Murkin & Batt 1987; Nordberg et al. 2018). invertebrates is a rare phenomenon in nature, This particularly pertains to the predation of though not unprecedented. Scorpions in invertebrates by larger vertebrate predators. particular are evolutionarily equipped to take However, there are far fewer instances of on such a task. Despite the hunting strategy invertebrates consuming vertebrate prey items and primarily insectivorous diet of scorpions, within the available literature. Scorpions are they are known to opportunistically prey upon primarily fossorial ambush predators, emerging small vertebrate prey such as lizards, frogs and from their burrows and lying in wait at the birds. Herein, we describe the observation of entrance for unsuspecting prey to wander too an adult Asian forest scorpion (Heterometrus close (Williams 1987). Scorpions typically laoticus; Scorpiones; Scorpionidae) predating exhibit an insectivorous diet, with the upon an adult triangle many-toothed snake exception of a few species (Williams 1987), (Sibynophis triangularis; Squamata: and have been known to prey on frogs, birds, Colubridae). Although the opportunistic lizards and even snakes (McCormick & Polis, predation on snakes by scorpions has been 1982).
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Snakes (Squamata: Serpentes) from Hoa Binh Province, Northwestern Vietnam
    Bonn zoological Bulletin 67 (1): 15–24 May 2018 New records of snakes (Squamata: Serpentes) from Hoa Binh Province, northwestern Vietnam Truong Quang Nguyen1,2,*, Tan Van Nguyen 1,3, Cuong The Pham1,2, An Vinh Ong4 & Thomas Ziegler5 1 Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet Road, Hanoi, Vietnam 2 Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 18 Hoang Quoc Viet Road, Hanoi, Vietnam 3 Save Vietnam’s Wildlife, Cuc Phuong National Park, Ninh Binh Province, Vietnam 4 Vinh University, 182 Le Duan Road, Vinh City, Nghe An Province, Vietnam 5 AG Zoologischer Garten Köln, Riehler Strasse 173, D-50735 Cologne, Germany * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. We report nine new records of snakes from Hoa Binh Province based on a reptile collection from Thuong Tien, Hang Kia-Pa Co, Ngoc Son-Ngo Luong nature reserves, and Tan Lac District, comprising six species of Colubri- dae (Dryocalamus davisonii, Euprepiophis mandarinus, Lycodon futsingensis, L. meridionalis, Sibynophis collaris and Sinonatrix aequifasciata), one species of Pareatidae (Pareas hamptoni) and two species of Viperidae (Protobothrops mu- crosquamatus and Trimeresurus gumprechti). In addition, we provide an updated list of 43 snake species from Hoa Binh Province. The snake fauna of Hoa Binh contains some species of conservation concern with seven species listed in the Governmental Decree No. 32/2006/ND-CP (2006), nine species listed in the Vietnam Red Data Book (2007), and three species listed in the IUCN Red List (2018). Key words. New records, snakes, taxonomy, Hoa Binh Province.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography and Scientific Name Index to Amphibians
    lb BIBLIOGRAPHY AND SCIENTIFIC NAME INDEX TO AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES IN THE PUBLICATIONS OF THE BIOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON BULLETIN 1-8, 1918-1988 AND PROCEEDINGS 1-100, 1882-1987 fi pp ERNEST A. LINER Houma, Louisiana SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE NO. 92 1992 SMITHSONIAN HERPETOLOGICAL INFORMATION SERVICE The SHIS series publishes and distributes translations, bibliographies, indices, and similar items judged useful to individuals interested in the biology of amphibians and reptiles, but unlikely to be published in the normal technical journals. Single copies are distributed free to interested individuals. Libraries, herpetological associations, and research laboratories are invited to exchange their publications with the Division of Amphibians and Reptiles. We wish to encourage individuals to share their bibliographies, translations, etc. with other herpetologists through the SHIS series. If you have such items please contact George Zug for instructions on preparation and submission. Contributors receive 50 free copies. Please address all requests for copies and inquiries to George Zug, Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC 20560 USA. Please include a self-addressed mailing label with requests. INTRODUCTION The present alphabetical listing by author (s) covers all papers bearing on herpetology that have appeared in Volume 1-100, 1882-1987, of the Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington and the four numbers of the Bulletin series concerning reference to amphibians and reptiles. From Volume 1 through 82 (in part) , the articles were issued as separates with only the volume number, page numbers and year printed on each. Articles in Volume 82 (in part) through 89 were issued with volume number, article number, page numbers and year.
    [Show full text]
  • Reptile Rap Newsletter of the South Asian Reptile Network ISSN 2230-7079 No.15 | January 2013 Date of Publication: 22 January 2013 1
    Reptile Rap Newsletter of the South Asian Reptile Network No.15 | January 2013 ISSN 2230-7079 Date of publication: 22 January 2013 1. Crocodile, 1. 2. Crocodile, Caiman, 3. Gharial, 4.Common Chameleon, 5. Chameleon, 9. Chameleon, Flap-necked 8. Chameleon Flying 7. Gecko, Dragon, Ptychozoon Chamaeleo sp. Fischer’s 10 dilepsis, 6. &11. Jackson’s Frill-necked 21. Stump-tailed Skink, 20. Gila Monster, Lizard, Green Iguana, 19. European Iguana, 18. Rhinoceros Antillean Basilisk, Iguana, 17. Lesser 16. Green 15. Common Lizard, 14. Horned Devil, Thorny 13. 12. Uromastyx, Lizard, 34. Eastern Tortoise, 33. 32. Rattlesnake Indian Star cerastes, 22. 31. Boa,Cerastes 23. Python, 25. 24. 30. viper, Ahaetulla Grass Rhinoceros nasuta Snake, 29. 26. 27. Asp, Indian Naja Snake, 28. Cobra, haje, Grater African 46. Ceratophrys, Bombina,45. 44. Toad, 43. Bullfrog, 42. Frog, Common 41. Turtle, Sea Loggerhead 40. Trionychidae, 39. mata Mata 38. Turtle, Snake-necked Argentine 37. Emydidae, 36. Tortoise, Galapagos 35. Turtle, Box 48. Marbled Newt Newt, Crested 47. Great Salamander, Fire Reptiles, illustration by Adolphe Millot. Source: Nouveau Larousse Illustré, edited by Claude Augé, published in Paris by Librarie Larousse 1897-1904, this illustration from vol. 7 p. 263 7 p. vol. from 1897-1904, this illustration Larousse Librarie by published in Paris Augé, Claude by edited Illustré, Larousse Nouveau Source: Millot. Adolphe by illustration Reptiles, www.zoosprint.org/Newsletters/ReptileRap.htm OPEN ACCESS | FREE DOWNLOAD REPTILE RAP #15, January 2013 Contents A new record of the Cochin Forest Cane Turtle Vijayachelys silvatica (Henderson, 1912) from Shendurney Wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala, India Arun Kanagavel, 3–6pp New Record of Elliot’s Shieldtail (Gray, 1858) in Seshachalam Biosphere Reserve, Eastern Ghats, Andhra Pradesh, India M.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Relationships of the Genus Sibynophis (Serpentes: Colubroidea)
    Volume 52(12):141-149, 2012 PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE GENUS SIBYNOPHIS (SERPENTES: COLUBROIDEA) 1,6 HUSSAM ZAHER 1,2 FELIPE G. GRAZZIOTIN 1,2 ROBERTA GRABOSKI 1 RICARDO G. FUENTES 1 PAOLA SÁNCHEZ-MARTINEZ 1 GIOVANNA G. MONTINGELLI 3,4 YA-PING ZHANG 3,5 ROBERT W. MURPHY ABSTRACT We present the results of the first molecular analysis of the phylogenetic affinities of the Asian colubroid genus Sibynophis. We recovered a sister-group relationship between Sibynophis and the New World Scaphiodontophis. Although Liophidium sometimes is associated with these genera, the relationship is distant. Morphological characters that Liophidium shares with Sibynophis and Scaphiodontophis are resolved as homoplasies that probably reflect the simi- larities of their specialized feeding habits. The traditional subfamily Sibynophiinae is elevated to the family-level, and Scaphiodontophiinae is placed in its synonymy. Key-Words: Sibynophiidae; Sibynophis; Scaphiodontophis; Phylogeny. INTRODUCTION process that is completely detached from the com- pound bone and teeth are numerous and closely set The genera Liophidium, Sibynophis, and Scaphi- (Duméril et al., 1854; Boulenger, 1890, 1896). odontophis occur on three distinct landmasses— Duméril et al. (1854) were the first authors to Madagascar, Asia, and Central America, respectively. place the four species that share these morphologi- Despite their isolation, these snakes long have been cal characteristics in the subgenus Enicognathus of thought to be closely related to each other. In each ge- their genus Ablabes. Later, Boulenger (1890) substi- nus, the dentary bears a peculiar posterior dentigerous tuted Enicognathus, preoccupied, with Polyodontophis 1. Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo. Caixa Postal 42.494, 04218-970, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Reptiles and Amphibians in the Annapurna-Dhaulagiri Region (Nepal)
    THE DISTRIBUTION OF REPTILES AND AMPHIBIANS IN THE ANNAPURNA-DHAULAGIRI REGION (NEPAL) by LURLY M.R. NANHOE and PAUL E. OUBOTER L.M.R. Nanhoe & P.E. Ouboter: The distribution of reptiles and amphibians in the Annapurna-Dhaulagiri region (Nepal). Zool. Verh. Leiden 240, 12-viii-1987: 1-105, figs. 1-16, tables 1-5, app. I-II. — ISSN 0024-1652. Key words: reptiles; amphibians; keys; Annapurna region; Dhaulagiri region; Nepal; altitudinal distribution; zoogeography. The reptiles and amphibians of the Annapurna-Dhaulagiri region in Nepal are keyed and described. Their distribution is recorded, based on both personal observations and literature data. The ecology of the species is discussed. The zoogeography and the altitudinal distribution are analysed. All in all 32 species-group taxa of reptiles and 21 species-group taxa of amphibians are treated. L.M.R. Nanhoe & P.E. Ouboter, c/o Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie Raamsteeg 2, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. CONTENTS Introduction 5 Study area 7 Climate and vegetation 9 Material and methods 12 Reptilia 13 Sauria 13 Gekkonidae 13 Hemidactylus brookii 14 Hemidactylus flaviviridis 14 Hemidactylus garnotii 15 Agamidae 15 Agama tuberculata 16 Calotes versicolor 18 Japalura major 19 Japalura tricarinata 20 Phrynocephalus theobaldi 22 Scincidae 24 Scincella capitanea 25 Scincella ladacensis ladacensis 26 3 4 ZOOLOGISCHE VERHANDELINGEN 240 (1987) Scincella ladacensis himalayana 27 2g Scincella sikimmensis ^ Sphenomorphus maculatus ^ Serpentes ^ Colubridae ^ Amphiesma platyceps ^
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 25 No. 1 March, 2000 H a M a D R Y a D V O L 25
    NO.1 25 M M A A H D A H O V D A Y C R R L 0 0 0 2 VOL. 25NO.1 MARCH, 2000 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 2% 3% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% 4% 5% HAMADRYAD Vol. 25. No. 1. March 2000 Date of issue: 31 March 2000 ISSN 0972-205X Contents A. E. GREER & D. G. BROADLEY. Six characters of systematic importance in the scincid lizard genus Mabuya .............................. 1–12 U. MANTHEY & W. DENZER. Description of a new genus, Hypsicalotes gen. nov. (Sauria: Agamidae) from Mt. Kinabalu, North Borneo, with remarks on the generic identity of Gonocephalus schultzewestrumi Urban, 1999 ................13–20 K. VASUDEVAN & S. K. DUTTA. A new species of Rhacophorus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from the Western Ghats, India .................21–28 O. S. G. PAUWELS, V. WALLACH, O.-A. LAOHAWAT, C. CHIMSUNCHART, P. DAVID & M. J. COX. Ethnozoology of the “ngoo-how-pak-pet” (Serpentes: Typhlopidae) in southern peninsular Thailand ................29–37 S. K. DUTTA & P. RAY. Microhyla sholigari, a new species of microhylid frog (Anura: Microhylidae) from Karnataka, India ....................38–44 Notes R. VYAS. Notes on distribution and breeding ecology of Geckoella collegalensis (Beddome, 1870) ..................................... 45–46 A. M. BAUER. On the identity of Lacerta tjitja Ljungh 1804, a gecko from Java .....46–49 M. F. AHMED & S. K. DUTTA. First record of Polypedates taeniatus (Boulenger, 1906) from Assam, north-eastern India ...................49–50 N. M. ISHWAR. Melanobatrachus indicus Beddome, 1878, resighted at the Anaimalai Hills, southern India .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Lotus Wind Power Project
    Initial Environmental Examination – Appendix H Project Number: 54211-001 March 2021 Document Stage: Draft Viet Nam: Lotus Wind Power Project Prepared by ERM Vietnam for Lien Lap Wind Power Joint Stock Company, Phong Huy Wind Power Joint Stock Company, and Phong Nguyen Wind Power Joint Stock Company as a requirement of the Asian Development Bank. The initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Biodiversity survey Wet season report Phong Huy Wind Power Project, Huong Hoa, Quang Tri, Viet Nam 7 July 2020 Prepared by ERM’s Subcontractor for ERM Vietnam Document details Document title Biodiversity survey Wet season report Document subtitle Phong Huy Wind Power Project, Huong Hoa, Quang Tri, Viet Nam Date 7 July 2020 Version 1.0 Author ERM’s Subcontractor Client Name ERM Vietnam Document history Version Revision Author Reviewed by ERM approval to issue Comments Name Date Draft 1.0 Name Name Name 00.00.0000 Text Version: 1.0 Client: ERM Vietnam 7 July 2020 BIODIVERSITY SURVEY WET SEASON REPORT CONTENTS Phong Huy Wind Power Project, Huong Hoa, Quang Tri, Viet Nam CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Fauna of Morankanda-Mukalana Secondary Forest Patch in Sri Lanka: a Checklist Reported from 2004-2008 Survey
    RUHUNA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE Vol 6: 21- 41, June 2015 ISSN: 1800-279X Faculty of Science University of Ruhuna Vertebrate fauna of Morankanda-Mukalana secondary forest patch in Sri Lanka: A checklist reported from 2004-2008 survey Hareschandra Bandula Jayaneththi Young Zoologists’ Association of Sri Lanka, National Zoological Gardens, Sri Lanka Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26th February 2015, Revised: 29th June 2015, Accepted: 30th June 2015 Abstract. Morankanda-Mukalana is a fragmented forest patch which is located in the Galle district, Southern wet zone of Sri Lanka. Biogeography of the Morankanda is noteworthy because it is located in the middle of the transition area of forest reserves or proposed forest reserves, which includes Beraliya Mukalana. This basic field survey was carried out upon the request made by Morakanda Estate management to define vertebrate checklist in the related area with the aim of starting analogue forestry as a future practice. During the study, a total of nine freshwater fish species were recorded (including four endemics), together with 14 species of amphibians (8 endemics), 43 reptile species (20 tetrapods and 23 serpentoids incl. 16 endemics), and 26 mammals (3 endemics). Avifauna comprised of 112 species (9 migrants) with 12 endemic birds (including proposed endemics). The high vertebrate faunal diversity revealed in this study paved the way for the estate management to change their plantation practice by maintaining partially analogue forestry following conservation practices which will positively affect to improve the status of wild fauna. Keywords. Agro-ecosystem, analogue forestry, endemic fauna, rain forests, vertebrate checklist. 1 Introduction Sri Lanka is an island off the southern tip of India, and is a biodiversity hotspot.
    [Show full text]
  • Kedar Bhide Its All About Hisssssss
    Its all about Hisssssss Kedar Bhide Snake and you § Kill it § Trap it § Push it § Call fire brigade/Police § Call Pest Control § Call snake charmers § Call Snake rescuers/Animal helplines § Live with it Know & I am more understand afraid than about me you I am a wild animal ( Living in state of nature, inhibiting natural haunts, not familiar with ,or not easily approached by Man, not tamed or domesticated),, Web definition of SNAKE 1. Any of numerous scaly, legless, sometimes venomous reptiles of the suborder Serpentes or Ophidia (order Squamata), having a long, tapering, cylindrical body and found in most tropical and temperate regions. 2. A treacherous person. Also called snake in the grass. 3. A long, highly flexible metal wire or coil used for cleaning drains. Also called plumber's snake. 4. Economics A fixing of the value of currencies to each other within defined parameters, which when graphed visually shows these currencies remaining parallel in value to each other as a unit despite fluctuations with other currencies. • Belongs to group of animals called Reptiles ( Class – Reptilia, - Crocodiles, Turtles & Tortoises, Geckos &Lizards) •Limbless reptiles with cylindrical body covered with scales • More than 2900 species in the world, In India represented at the moment by 276 species • Rich diversity in Western Ghats and North East India, many endemic species ( Ecological state of being unique to a particular geographic location) •Ranges from 12 cms to 6 meters, Found in all color forms • Are found in all habitats, terrestrial ( Land) ,
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    CHINESE AMPHIBIANS AND KEPTILES IN THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM By Leonhard Stejneger Head Curator of Biology, United States National Museum The United States National Museum has of late years received a lar^e number of amphibians and reptiles from China, and as there are indications of an increasing interest in these vertebrates among students and collectors in that country, it has been thought best to give as full an account as practicable of the material available, in order to acquaint them not only with what the National Museum possesses, but inferentially with what is still needed before a com- plete herpetology of Qhina proper can be attempted. In my Herpetology of Japan and Adjacent Territory^ I included not only the Russian Coast Province of Siberia, but also Korea, eastern Manchuria, and adjoining parts of northeastern China proper. Each genus and species, the Chinese ones included, were treated in detail, with full synonymy and bibliographic references, etc. In a subsequent paper, The Batrachians and Keptiles of Formosa,- genera and species added to the fauna since 1907 were similarly elaborated in full. It has been considered unnecessary to repeat these synony- mies and references in the present paper, hence only genera and species not found in the two earlier works are here treated in the same manner. However, reference has been given under each species to the page in the Herpetology of Japan and the paper re- lating to Formosa, where the species with synonymy, description, and frequently also illustration may be found. In addition, refer- ences omitted in the earlier work are given in so far as they relate to China proper, but no attempt has been made to include those re- ferring to Hainan and Formosa.
    [Show full text]