Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 76, No. 7, pp. 3406-3410, July 1979 Evolution Interior remodeling of the shell by a gastropod mollusc (biomineralization/Conus/shell dissolution) ALAN J. KOHN, ELIZABETH R. MYERS, AND V. R. MEENAKSHI Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 Communicated by W. T. Edmondson, April 26, 1979

ABSTRACT As the Conus shell grows by spiraling of the outer lip around the axis, profound internal shell dissolution thins the walls of the protected penultimate whorl from several millimeters to <50&m. Shell material is added to the inside of the spire and the anterior part of the columella. The resulting shell has a uniformly thick last whorl and thickened spire that enhance defense against crushing predators and a greatly ex- panded interior living space for the animal. The molluscan shell has gained prominence in recent years as an especially favorable system for the analysis of biominerali- zation processes (1-4). Much less attention has been paid to shell dissolution, a continuing, permanent, and profound process that alters exterior and interior surfaces of the shell in certain pro- sobranch gastropods (5-7). In the genus Conus, dissolution of the internal walls of the shell is particularly striking while shell material is added from within to thicken regions of the shell some distance from its growing edge. Although these renova- tions have not been studied previously, the resulting very thin inner wall structure has long been known (8) and was used as the primary character separating subfamilies of the Conidae in an early classification (9). In this study we addressed the following questions: (i) What regions and layers of the shell are involved in dissolution and FIG. 1. Axial section of shell of C. lividus Hwass in Bruguiere, thickening? (ii) Of the shell material deposited by the animal illustrating terms used. The outer lip is at right (also the animal's right during its life, how much is later dissolved? (iii) How much of side); the anterior end is at the bottom. Outermost calcified layer 1 the animal's living space within the shell does dissolution pro- appears white but contains a yellow pigment in C. lividus. Layer 2 duce? (iv) What is the adaptive significance of interior shell contains dark purple to brown pigment visible in the photograph. Inner layers 3 and 4 appear white and indistinguishable from each remodeling? other. Lines mark percentages of total aperture height and correspond to cross sections in Figs. 2 and 3. i, Posterior region of whorl where MATERIALS AND METHODS dissolution does not occur; ii, depositional region at adhesion zone on previous whorl; iii, depositional region on abapical surface ofdis- We selected Conus lividus Hwass in Bruguiere, an inhabitant solved previous whorl; col, anterior thickening of columella; ridge, of tropical Indo-West Pacific coral reefs, as representative of spiral ridge in last whorl. the genus. Shells collected in Hawaii were filled with resin to preserve the integrity of the inner whorls and then were sec- tioned axially or transversely to permit measurements of shell the several layers comprising the gastropod shell (11). The thickness. Etched, polished, gold-coated sections were used to mantle on the animal's right side secretes the growing edge or aid visualization of boundaries between shell layers. For scan- outer lip of the dextrally coiled shell. The outermost shell layer ning electron microscopy, pieces of fractured shell were cleaned is the uncalcified proteinaceous periostracum. Inward of this in dilute sodium hypochlorite and coated with gold or gold/ are several layers of crystalline CaCO3 with a glycoprotein palladium. matrix of 2% or less by weight (1, 12). Primitive prosobranch gastropods (order Archaeogastropoda) vary widely in crystal RESULTS form and architecture (13). Shells of the most derived order Neogastropoda are structurally more uniform, consisting pri- In C. lividus as well as most species in the genus, both spire and marily of three or four aragonitic layers of linear or branching last whorl are conic; thus, the whole shell appears biconic, with This consists of a long, narrow aperture (Fig. 1). As the shell grows, its shape crossed lamellar crystal architecture (14, 15). remains constant (10). series of elongate, curved, branching and interdigitating pri- To appreciate dissolution, one must understand how the shell mary lamels, each comprised of secondary lamels oriented as is produced. Histochemically differentiated regions of outer parallel laths. Each secondary lamel consists of tertiary lamels; and calcium cells secrete these are parallel needle- or rod-like crystals (Fig. 2E) (13-17). mantle epithelium underlying gland The secondary lamels in adjacent primary lamels are oriented at a characteristic angle [commonly, 82° (14); mean d SD, 82.90 The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page L charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "ad- 5.50 in layers 1 and 3 of a specimen of C. lividus]. This is a vertisement" in accordance with 18 U. S. C. §1734 solely to indicate strong, interwoven or interlocking structure analogous to ply- this fact. wood (16, 17). Although the pattern is not rigidly maintained 3406 Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 Evolution: Kohn et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979) 3407 Thickness of the shell, and of each component layer, is rather uniform proximal to the growth region of the outer lip in the posterior region of the last whorl (Figs. 2B, 3 A, B, E, and F). ! Layer 2 is the thickest (Fig. 2E) and strongest; it determines the I path of shell breakage, particularly near the outer lip where the growing shell is thin and most susceptible to damage from ac- cident or attempted predation (18). The shell is thickened in two ways anterior to the midregion I of the last whorl, primarily by layer 3: (i) between about 2250 and the columella (Fig. 1, col; Fig. 2 C and D; major peaks in Fig. 3C; high end points of curves in Fig. 3D), and (i) a spiral ridge characteristic of C. lividus and certain other species of Conus but not of general occurrence in the genus (Figs. 1 and .i. 2C; peaks in Fig. 3D and at left in Fig. 3C). Figs. 2B and 4 show that the shell does not merely gradually t1 thicken as it grows. The walls of the penultimate and earlier whorls are extremely thin, due to dissolution that begins slightly I I4 more than one revolution in from the outer lip (range 3720- 4560; mean, 413°; n = 13) and is mostly completed within an arc of 85°-160° (mean, 1120; n = 8). If thinning of the penul- timate whorl did not keep pace with thickening of the last whorl, the narrow aperture of the shell would be nearly oc- cluded (Fig. 2B). Etched, polished sections and scanning electron micrographs of fractured shells in the region of dissolution show that shell material is dissolved smoothly and without regard to crystal architecture (Fig. 4C). We assume that the mantle on the ani- mal's left side is applied to the shell and causes its dissolution in this region, but we base this on anatomy of the animal re- moved from its shell rather than on direct observation. Layer 1 is dissolved first, at about 390°-400° at the 80% level (Figs. 2B and 3E) and further inward (420°-470°) anteriorly (Figs. 3 and 4A). Thinning of layer 2 begins immediately at the point of its exposure to the mantle; it completely disappears at FIG. 2. C. lividus. (A) Cross section of outer lip, showing 450°-495° (Figs. 3 and 4 B and C). Layer 3 then immediately crossed-lamellar crystal microstructure oflayer 1 at growing edge (left) begins to thin (Fig. 4C). Generally it does not completely dis- and layer 2 beginning on inner depositional surface (arrow). (Light appear, but some regions of inner whorls in the posterior third micrograph of etched, polished, gold-coated specimen; scale bar = consist of 4 The innermost 0.5 mm.) (B) Cross section at 80% level (Fig. 1), showing system of only layer (Fig. 3E). walls, consisting indicating position by degrees from outer lip and regions of thickening of layer 3 or 4 or both, remain patent throughout (Fig. 4D; gaps (0°-90°) and dissolution (380o°480'). (C) Cross section at 32%o level, in Fig. 2B are artifacts of preparation), but they are extremely showing spiral ridge and thickening of central columellar region, thin, often 35-50 Am (Figs. 1 and 2B). They presumably primarily by layer 3. (D) Cross section at 20%o level, showing columellar function to support the digestive gland, which fills all early thickening. (B-D, etched, polished, uncoated specimens; scale bars whorl space within the spire. = 5 mm.) (E) Cross section at 50% level, about 900 from outer lip, showing lamel structure and orientation in layers 1, 2, and 3. Outer As the Conus shell grows by helical progression of the outer shell surface is at top; inner or depositional surface is at bottom right. lip around the axis of coiling, the new growth covers all but the 1', width of primary lamel; 2', arrow indicates secondary lamels within most posterior part of the previous whorl. This results in a spire primary lamel; 3', arrows indicate edges oftertiary lamels on surface that, unlike the last whorl, is not covered by subsequent external of primary lamel. (Scanning electron micrograph of fractured, gold- deposition of shell, but remains exposed to attack by predators, coated specimen; scale bar = 0.05 mm.) boring organisms, and physical environmental stresses for the animal's entire life. because the primary lamels curve, the long axes of primary The thick shell in the spire (Fig. 1) results from three fac- lamels of adjacent layers are oriented generally perpendicularly tors. to each other, further strengthening the shell in all planes (18, (i) Shell dissolution does not occur in about the posterior 25% 19). of the aperture length (indicated by the dark pigment bands The outer lip or growing edge of the shell consists only of in layer 2 of the spire; Fig. 1, i); periostracum and outermost calcified layer (layer 1); the long (ii) A broad adhesion zone between successive whorls (Fig. axes of the primary lamels of layer 1 lie generally in the plane 1) formed by deposition of layer 1 on the outside of the of Fig. 2E. Layer 2 begins within 100 of the outer lip; the long underlying layer 1 at the posterior end of the aperture; depo- axes of its primary lamels parallel the outer lip (Figs. 2 A and sition of layers 2 and 3 fills the space just anterior to the recurved E). Layer 3 begins about 30-50° from the outer lip; its-primary layer 1 (Fig. 1, ii); this filling is complete about 400 from the lamels are oriented as in layer 1 (Fig. 2E). Layer 4 (Figs. 3 and outer lip; 4A) begins about 900 from the outer lip, but occurs only in the (iii) Deposition of layer 4, starting at about 2600, on the posterior third of the shell; its primary lamels are generally abapical surface of shell that has remained undissolved in the oriented as in layer 2, but the crystal architecture of its inner previous whorl (Fig. 1, iii). portion is often less clearly organized (Fig. 4D). At 180° intervals on projections of axial sections such as Fig. Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 3408 Evolution: Kohn et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sca. USA 76 (1979)

A 80% 4.0-

3.0-

2.0- 0 0 . 0 0 0

1.0

I * . I I I

E E 1. c 4) (. to C, 0 - C.)0

-O 4C 0.0 0 c -I- 0t0o

32%

3.1

* *

1

180 270 360 450 540 630 720 Outer 180 !:) 270 360 450 720 -1< lip ~~~~~~90 Last whorl Penultimate whorl >- < Last whorl |< Penultimate-*i Degrees inward from outer lip whorl FIG. 3. (Legend appears at the bottom of the next page.) Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 Evolution: Kohn et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979) 3409

4 d iL t

FIG. 4. C. lividus. Cross sections of shells showing crystal architecture and dissolution of internal walls at about 80% level (Fig. 1). (A) Between 390° and 4000. Primary lamels in layers 1 and 3 are approximately parallel and those in layers 2 and 4 are approximately perpendicular to the plane of the section. Dissolution is proceeding from left (inward, toward columella) to right (outward, toward outer lip) along the exterior (abaxial) surface (upper right). Arrowhead indicates point of disappearance of layer 1 and beginning of thinning of layer 2. (B) Between 4750 and 495°. Arrowhead indicates point of disappearance of layer 2 and beginning of thinning of layer 3. Spiral lines through layers 3 and 4 probably indicate temporary growth cessations. (A and B, light micrographs of etched, polished, gold-coated sections; scale bars = 0.5 mm. (C) At 475°. Specimen is tilted to show the dissolution surface (dis) smoothly crossing axes of crystals. Arrowhead indicates point of disappearance of layer 2. (D) At 4800. Detail of layers 3 and 4, showing curvature of primary lamels in layer 3. (C and D, scanning electron micrographs of fractured, gold-coated specimens; scale bars = 100,um.)

1, we estimated the area of shell added to the spire, the total area iii) contributed the remainder. Of all shell material secreted of shell secreted, and the area later dissolved. We then calcu- during these animals' lives, 24% and 26% had been dissolved lated ratios of these values raised to the 3/2 power to approxi- at the time of death. Inward of the point where shell thinning mate shell volume or mass. For two specimens of C. lividus 36 begins, this dissolution provided 70% and 60% of the living and 42 mm long, the intact region posterior to the dissolution space within the two shells. An alternative method of calcula- zone (factors i and ii) accounted for 71% and 73%, respectively, tion, based on treating the projections of spire and last whorl of the shell material of the spire. Addition from within (factor as conic sections, gave values within 3% of these.

FIG. 3 (on preceding page). Thickness of the last and penultimate whorls and their component layers in C. lividus, to illustrate regions of shell growth and dissolution. (A-D) Total shell thickness of three specimens from Hawaii (each indicated by a different symbol and line), measured from cross sections at 32, 50, 64, and 80% of aperture height (Fig. 1). (E-H) Proportion of total shell thickness represented by each layer at levels corresponding to A-D. The lines plot mean values of the three specimens; numbers on the lines indicate layers. X intercepts at left indicate initiation of each layer; X intercepts at right indicate disappearance of layers due to dissolution. Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021 3410 Evolution: Kohn et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76 (1979)

DISCUSSION 1. Gregoire, C. (1972) in Chemical Zoology, eds. Florkin, M. & Scheer, B. T. (Academic, New York, NY), Vol. 7, pp. 45-102. An evolutionary trend toward increasing thickness of marine 2. Wilbur, K. M. (1972) in Chemical Zoology, eds. Florkin, M. & gastropod shells in the late Mesozoic and early Tertiary was Scheer, B. T. (Academic, New York, NY), Vol. 7, pp. 103-145. associated with increasing intensity of predation by shell 3. Clark, G. R. (1976) Am. Zool. 16,617-626. crushing (20). Conus, which first appears in the fossil record 4. Watabe, N. & Wilbur, K. M., eds. (1976) The Mechanisms of in late Cretaceous (N. F. Sohl, personal communication), Mineralization in the Invertebrates and Plants (Univ. of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC). spearheaded this trend. Its thick last whorl and spire clearly 5. Carriker, M. R. (1972) Veliger 15,69-74. enhance protection from predation (18). However, the walls 6. Morton, J. E. (1955) Proc. Zool. Soc. London 125, 127-168. of the penultimate and earlier whorls are no longer exposed 7. Vermeij, G. J. (1973) Mar. Biol. 20, 319-346. (Fig. 2B), and shell material can thus be dissolved from these 8. Schroter, J. S. (1783) Ueber den innern Bau der See- und einiger inner whorls without reducing protection. ausldndischen Erd- und Flussschnecken (Varrentrapp Sohn & We conclude that the internal shell remodeling we have Wenner, Frankfurt, Germany). described is adaptively significant to Conus in two ways: 9. Cossmann, M. (1896) Essais de paleoconchologie comparee (M. Cossmann, Paris), Vol. 2. (i) Shell weight is reduced while thickness of the last whorl 10. Kohn, A. J. & Riggs, A. C. (1975) Syst. Zool. 24,346-359. and spire is maintained or enhanced in defense against attack 11. Timmermans, L. P. M. (1969) Neth. J. Zool. 19,417-523. by enemies and physical stresses of the reef environment, 12. Weiner, S. & Hood, L. (1975) Science 190,987-989. and 13. MacClintock, C. (1967) Bull. Peabody Mus. Nat. Hist. Yale Univ. (ii) More space is provided for the animal's body within the 22, 1-140. shell. This is especially important in Conus because of the 14. Boggild, 0. B. (1930) Kgl. Danske Videnskab. Selskabs, Skr. mode of intact Naturvidenskab. Math. Afdel. 2,232-325. typical feeding swallowing large, prey organisms 15. Carter, J. G. (1976) Dissertation (Yale, New Haven, CT). (21) and of the constraints of a conispiral shell that has a long, 16. Currey, J. D. & Taylor, J. D. (1974) J. Zool. 173,395-406. narrow aperture and grows isometrically. 17. Philippon, J. & Plaziat, J. C. (1975) C.R. Hebd. Sci.:Acad. Sci. 281, 617-620. We thank Alan C. Riggs for technical assistance and discussion of 18. Currey, J. D. & Kohn, A. J. (1976) J. Mat. Sci. 11, 1615-1623. the manuscript and Arnold G. Schmidt for aid with the scanning 19. Philippon, J. (1974) C. R. Hebd. Sci. Acad. Sci. 279, 145-147. electron microscopy. This research was supported by National Science 20. Vermeij, G. J. (1977) Paleobiology 3, 245-258. Foundation Grants GB-32105X and DEB 77-24430. 21. Kohn, A. J. (1959) Ecol. Monogr. 29,47-90. Downloaded by guest on September 30, 2021