DOCSLIB.ORG

C:\Mike's Documents\Book\Thirdedition\Temp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C:\Mike's Documents\Book\Thirdedition\Temp Itea virginica L. Virginia Sweetspire Other Common Names: Sweet-Spine, Sweetspire, Tassel-White, Virginia Tea, Virginia Willow. Family: Saxifragaceae (variously segregated by one authority or another into the Escalloniaceae, Iteaceae, or Grossulariaceae); the familial classification of this species is very confused. Cold Hardiness: Virgininia Sweetspire is hardy as a species in USDA zones 5(4) to 9, although individual plant hardiness varies by cultivar. Foliage: Simple; tardily deciduous, unless early defoliation occurs due to drought; alternate; obovate- elliptic; 2O to 4O long by ½O to 1¼O wide; tips acute to short acuminate; bases acute to nearly rounded; margins finely serrate; veins pinnate, arching forward and following edge the near the margins; veins impressed above and raised beneath; glabrous; light to dark green, sometimes flushed red, in summer, developing yellow, orange, or red fall colors in good years; fall colors develop better in cooler climates; petioles short, cO to ¼O long, green, often flushed red. Flower: Terminal 2O to 6O long tassel-like racemes of small ¼O long five-petal white bell-shaped slightly fragrant flowers appear in mid-spring in warmer climates to early summer in cooler regions; flowers can be very showy when present en masse. Fruit: Small capsules in nodding racemes; capsules ¼O to dO long containing very tiny seeds; persistent, but not particularly ornamental. Stem / Bark: Stems — green, then red, eventually gray-brown; minutely downy, becoming glabrous; moderately thin, often nodding at the tips and tending to be rather wandering in form, sometimes 1 described as wand-like; pith white and excavated; Buds — imbricate; tiny, /16O to cO long; green to tan; may be superposed when flower buds are present; Bark — mature bark smooth gray brown to brown, exfoliating with age. Habit: Individual stems are erect, then nodding, tending to branch near the ends of the stems; stems sucker from short underground rhizomes, eventually growing 3N to 8N tall and continuing to slowly spread as the plant ages; many of the available cultivars are selected from the lower growing forms; shrubs are medium in overall texture. Cultural Requirements: Virginia Sweetspire requires a moist site and can tolerate less than perfect drainage, but does not handle extended drought well; shrubs grow best on rich moist acidic soils, but will tolerate neutral pH; full sun is acceptable with adequate moisture, but this species benefits from afternoon shade in much of our region; soil quality and available moisture become more critical the further south and west one cultivates the plant; prune plants immediately after flowering as flowers are borne from overwintering buds. Pathological Problems: Defoliation and marginal necrosis can be a problem on dry sites; few disease or pest problems are serious, although a leafspot caused by fungi in the genus Phyllosticta and foliar feeding from chewing insects can be periodic problems. Ornamental Assets: Assets include a nice spreading irregular mound-like growth habit, handsome summer and fall foliage, and of course showy fragrant flowers. Limitations & Liabilities: Drought tolerance and high pH soil tolerance is limited; this species performs much better in the eastern portions of our region; in stressful sites, foliage tends to look worn by season’s end. Landscape Utilization: Where adapted plants are can be effective for large scale massing, foundation plantings and general purpose uses for small and medium size shrubs; in our region, plants will benefit from siting where they will receive at least afternoon shade; winter forms are less appealing than in summer as plants are deciduous, so avoid using them where they screen winter views; Itea virginica could be useful in moist to wet problem areas and works well where growth conditions permit naturalizing. Other Comments: I have come to appreciate the beauty of this species were it can be grown successfully, unfortunately it is often offered in portions of our region where it is marginally adapted; the genus name is the ancient Greek name for a willow (plants usually classified in the genus Salix); the specific epithet honors the state of Virginia. Native Habitat: Native to moist swampy areas and stream banks in the Eastern U.S., its range extending as far west as East Texas. Related Taxa: Itea virginica is the lone North American member of this genus, but several other species are native to Asia and may also prove useful in regional landscapes. References: Dirr, 1998; Foote and Jones, 1989; Grimm, 1993; Odenwald and Turner, 1996; Vines, 1960. Copyright 2006 with all rights reserved by Michael A. Arnold; intended for future inclusion in Landscape Plants For Texas, Third Edition..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Lists of the Vascular Plant Families with Their Phylogenetic
    Colligo 2 (1) : 3-10 BOTANIQUE Alphabetical lists of the vascular plant families with their phylogenetic classification numbers Listes alphabétiques des familles de plantes vasculaires avec leurs numéros de classement phylogénétique FRÉDÉRIC DANET* *Mairie de Lyon, Espaces verts, Jardin botanique, Herbier, 69205 Lyon cedex 01, France - [email protected] Citation : Danet F., 2019. Alphabetical lists of the vascular plant families with their phylogenetic classification numbers. Colligo, 2(1) : 3- 10. https://perma.cc/2WFD-A2A7 KEY-WORDS Angiosperms family arrangement Summary: This paper provides, for herbarium cura- Gymnosperms Classification tors, the alphabetical lists of the recognized families Pteridophytes APG system in pteridophytes, gymnosperms and angiosperms Ferns PPG system with their phylogenetic classification numbers. Lycophytes phylogeny Herbarium MOTS-CLÉS Angiospermes rangement des familles Résumé : Cet article produit, pour les conservateurs Gymnospermes Classification d’herbier, les listes alphabétiques des familles recon- Ptéridophytes système APG nues pour les ptéridophytes, les gymnospermes et Fougères système PPG les angiospermes avec leurs numéros de classement Lycophytes phylogénie phylogénétique. Herbier Introduction These alphabetical lists have been established for the systems of A.-L de Jussieu, A.-P. de Can- The organization of herbarium collections con- dolle, Bentham & Hooker, etc. that are still used sists in arranging the specimens logically to in the management of historical herbaria find and reclassify them easily in the appro- whose original classification is voluntarily pre- priate storage units. In the vascular plant col- served. lections, commonly used methods are systema- Recent classification systems based on molecu- tic classification, alphabetical classification, or lar phylogenies have developed, and herbaria combinations of both.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant Catalog
    native plant catalog HERBACEOUS PLANTS Page 1 Botanical Name Common Name Color Bloom Light Soil Height Agastache 'Black Adder' Hyssop Violet-Blue June-Sept Full Sun M-D 2-3' Fragrant flowers attract bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds; Compact and good for containers; Deer resistant. Allium cernuum Nodding Onion Lt Pink May-June Sun-Pt Shade D 12-18” Attracts bees and butterflies; perfect for rocky soils; tolerates drought once established. Amsonia 'Blue Ice' Blue Star Dark Blue Apr-May Sun-Pt Shade M 12-15" Attracts hummingbirds, bees, and butterflies; foliage turns golden yellow in fall, adding stunning color to the garden. Amsonia tab. var. salicifolia Eastern Bluestar Lt Blue Apr-May Sun-Pt Shade M 2-3’ Attracts bees and butterflies; tolerates clay soil and drought; attractive yellow fall color. Stake in moist soils. Aquilegia canadensis Wild Columbine Red and Yellow Apr-May Part Shade M-D 1-3' Attracts hummingbirds and butterflies; self sows in woodland garden. Tolerates dry soil and deer. Arisaema triphyllum Jack-in-the-Pulpit Green/Maroon Apr-June Shade M 1-2' Bright red berry cluster in fall provides food for birds, mammals, and turtles. A true specimen plant for the woodland garden. Asarum canadense Wild Ginger Maroon May-June Shade M 6" Alternate larval host plant for pipevine swallowtail butterfly; a wonderful slow-spreading groundcover for deep shade. Asclepias incarnata Swamp Milkweed Rose-Pink July-Sept Full Sun M-W 3-5’ Larval host for monarch butterfly; attracts bees, butterflies, and hummingbirds; a good choice for rain gardens; tolerates clay soils. Asclepias syriaca Common Milkweed Pale Pink July-Sept Full Sun M-D 2-4' Larval host for monarch butterfly; attracts bees, butterflies and hummingbirds; tolerates clay soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary History of Floral Key Innovations in Angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes
    Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes To cite this version: Elisabeth Reyes. Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms. Botanics. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2016. English. NNT : 2016SACLS489. tel-01443353 HAL Id: tel-01443353 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01443353 Submitted on 23 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. NNT : 2016SACLS489 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY, préparée à l’Université Paris-Sud ÉCOLE DOCTORALE N° 567 Sciences du Végétal : du Gène à l’Ecosystème Spécialité de Doctorat : Biologie Par Mme Elisabeth Reyes Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Thèse présentée et soutenue à Orsay, le 13 décembre 2016 : Composition du Jury : M. Ronse de Craene, Louis Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux d’Édimbourg M. Forest, Félix Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux de Kew Mme. Damerval, Catherine Directrice de recherche au Moulon Président du jury M. Lowry, Porter Curateur en chef aux Jardins Examinateur Botaniques du Missouri M. Haevermans, Thomas Maître de conférences au MNHN Examinateur Mme. Nadot, Sophie Professeur à l’Université Paris-Sud Directeur de thèse M.
    [Show full text]
  • Morton Virginia Sweetspire – Scarlet Beauty™ Itea Virginica ‘Morton’
    CHICAGOLAND GROWS®, INC. Plant Introduction Program - Plant Release Bulletin #28 Morton Virginia Sweetspire – Scarlet Beauty™ Itea virginica ‘Morton’ The Morton Virginia sweetspire is a summer-flowering shrub with excellent fall color. This selection has superior hardiness and a higher soil pH tolerance than other cultivars of the species. An easy-to-grow native shrub selected from the collections at The Morton Arboretum. Chicagoland Grows® is a nonprofit corporation of the Chicago Botanic Garden, The Morton Arboretum, and the Ornamental Growers Association of Northern Illinois (OGA). Morton Virginia Sweetspire – Scarlet Beauty™ Itea virginica ‘Morton’ Botanical Name Ornamental Characteristics Itea virginica ‘Morton’ The white flowers are densely borne on numerous pendant 3-inch-long inflorescences that are produced from mid-June Common Name to early July, when few other shrubs are in bloom. The flowers Morton Virginia Sweetspire have a faint but pleasing fragrance and are attractive to butterflies. Medium-green foliage all summer changes to deep Family orange-red to red-purple in autumn, peaking in early November Iteaceae and persisting through a very hard frost. In milder climates, the colorful foliage can persist much of the winter. The stems can Origin also turn a pleasing red color during winter months. Selected in 1999 by Kris Bachtell of The Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illinois, from a plant that has been in the Arboretum’s Culture collection since the late 1950s. The species is native throughout Best grown on moist to wet soils with ample organic matter. the southeastern United States, from coastal Florida north to As with most selections of Virginia sweetspire, ‘Morton’ prefers New Jersey and from eastern Texas north into southern Illinois.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fossil Record of Angiosperm Families in Relation to Baraminology
    The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism Volume 7 Article 31 2013 The Fossil Record of Angiosperm Families in Relation to Baraminology Roger W. Sanders Bryan College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings DigitalCommons@Cedarville provides a publication platform for fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the Internet to all users immediately upon publication. However, the opinions and sentiments expressed by the authors of articles published in our journals do not necessarily indicate the endorsement or reflect the views of DigitalCommons@Cedarville, the Centennial Library, or Cedarville University and its employees. The authors are solely responsible for the content of their work. Please address questions to [email protected]. Browse the contents of this volume of The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism. Recommended Citation Sanders, Roger W. (2013) "The Fossil Record of Angiosperm Families in Relation to Baraminology," The Proceedings of the International Conference on Creationism: Vol. 7 , Article 31. Available at: https://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/icc_proceedings/vol7/iss1/31 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Creationism. Pittsburgh, PA: Creation Science Fellowship THE FOSSIL RECORD OF ANGIOSPERM FAMILIES IN RELATION TO BARAMINOLOGY Roger W. Sanders, Ph.D., Bryan College #7802, 721 Bryan Drive, Dayton, TN 37321 USA KEYWORDS: Angiosperms, flowering plants, fossils, baramins, Flood, post-Flood continuity criterion, continuous fossil record ABSTRACT To help estimate the number and boundaries of created kinds (i.e., baramins) of flowering plants, the fossil record has been analyzed. To designate the status of baramin, a criterion is applied that tests whether some but not all of a group’s hierarchically immediate subgroups have a fossil record back to the Flood (accepted here as near the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary).
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 ON THE COVER Duck potato (Sagittaria latifolia) at Ocmulgee National Monument. Photograph by: Sarah C. Heath, SECN Botanist. Vegetation Community Monitoring at Ocmulgee National Monument, 2011 Natural Resource Data Series NPS/SECN/NRDS—2014/702 Sarah Corbett Heath1 Michael W. Byrne2 1USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network Cumberland Island National Seashore 101 Wheeler Street Saint Marys, Georgia 31558 2USDI National Park Service Southeast Coast Inventory and Monitoring Network 135 Phoenix Road Athens, Georgia 30605 September 2014 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colorado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Data Series is intended for the timely release of basic data sets and data summaries. Care has been taken to assure accuracy of raw data values, but a thorough analysis and interpretation of the data has not been completed. Consequently, the initial analyses of data in this report are provisional and subject to change. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Paleobotanical Studies of the Early Eocene Okanagan (Okanogan) Highlands Floras of British Columbia, Canada and Washington, USA
    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences A review of paleobotanical studies of the Early Eocene Okanagan (Okanogan) Highlands floras of British Columbia, Canada and Washington, USA. Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2015-0177.R1 Manuscript Type: Review Date Submitted by the Author: 02-Feb-2016 Complete List of Authors: Greenwood, David R.; Brandon University, Dept. of Biology Pigg, KathleenDraft B.; School of Life Sciences, Basinger, James F.; Dept of Geological Sciences DeVore, Melanie L.; Dept of Biological and Environmental Science, Keyword: Eocene, paleobotany, Okanagan Highlands, history, palynology https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Page 1 of 70 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 1 A review of paleobotanical studies of the Early Eocene Okanagan (Okanogan) 2 Highlands floras of British Columbia, Canada and Washington, USA. 3 4 David R. Greenwood, Kathleen B. Pigg, James F. Basinger, and Melanie L. DeVore 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Draft 12 David R. Greenwood , Department of Biology, Brandon University, J.R. Brodie Science 13 Centre, 270-18th Street, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada; 14 Kathleen B. Pigg , School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, PO Box 874501, 15 Tempe, AZ 85287-4501, USA [email protected]; 16 James F. Basinger , Department of Geological Sciences, University of Saskatchewan, 17 Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada; 18 Melanie L. DeVore , Department of Biological & Environmental Sciences, Georgia 19 College & State University, 135 Herty Hall, Milledgeville, GA 31061 USA 20 21 22 23 Corresponding author: David R. Greenwood (email: [email protected]) 1 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/cjes-pubs Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 70 24 A review of paleobotanical studies of the Early Eocene Okanagan (Okanogan) 25 Highlands floras of British Columbia, Canada and Washington, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Woody Shrubs for Stormwater Retention Practices 1 TABLE of CONTENTS
    Woody Shrubs for Stormwater Retention Practices School of Integrative Plant Science, Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regions Horticulture Section Second Edition Ethan M. Dropkin, Nina Bassuk and Trevan Signorelli Woody Shrubs for Stormwater Retention Practices 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS What is Stormwater? ................................................................................... 3 Stormwater Issues ....................................................................................... 4 Combined Sewer Overflow......................................................................... 5 Municipal, State and Federal Stormwater Regulations ............................ 6 Stormwater Infiltration Practices ............................................................... 6 Why Use Plants? .......................................................................................... 7 What Plants are Best? ................................................................................. 8 Site Assessment .......................................................................................... 9 Site Assessment Checklist ......................................................................... 12 Design Consideration Prior to Plant Selection ......................................... 13 Establishment .............................................................................................. 14 Maintenance ................................................................................................. 15 Plant Selection ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Native Plants for Wildlife Habitat and Conservation Landscaping Chesapeake Bay Watershed Acknowledgments Contributors: Printing was made possible through the generous funding from Adkins Arboretum; Baltimore County Department of Environmental Protection and Resource Management; Chesapeake Bay Trust; Irvine Natural Science Center; Maryland Native Plant Society; National Fish and Wildlife Foundation; The Nature Conservancy, Maryland-DC Chapter; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Cape May Plant Materials Center; and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Reviewers: species included in this guide were reviewed by the following authorities regarding native range, appropriateness for use in individual states, and availability in the nursery trade: Rodney Bartgis, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Ashton Berdine, The Nature Conservancy, West Virginia. Chris Firestone, Bureau of Forestry, Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources. Chris Frye, State Botanist, Wildlife and Heritage Service, Maryland Department of Natural Resources. Mike Hollins, Sylva Native Nursery & Seed Co. William A. McAvoy, Delaware Natural Heritage Program, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control. Mary Pat Rowan, Landscape Architect, Maryland Native Plant Society. Rod Simmons, Maryland Native Plant Society. Alison Sterling, Wildlife Resources Section, West Virginia Department of Natural Resources. Troy Weldy, Associate Botanist, New York Natural Heritage Program, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Graphic Design and Layout: Laurie Hewitt, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Chesapeake Bay Field Office. Special thanks to: Volunteer Carole Jelich; Christopher F. Miller, Regional Plant Materials Specialist, Natural Resource Conservation Service; and R. Harrison Weigand, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Division for assistance throughout this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Four: Landscaping with Native Plants a Gardener’S Guide for Missouri Landscaping with Native Plants a Gardener’S Guide for Missouri
    Chapter Four: Landscaping with Native Plants A Gardener’s Guide for Missouri Landscaping with Native Plants A Gardener’s Guide for Missouri Introduction Gardening with native plants is becoming the norm rather than the exception in Missouri. The benefits of native landscaping are fueling a gardening movement that says “no” to pesticides and fertilizers and “yes” to biodiversity and creating more sustainable landscapes. Novice and professional gardeners are turning to native landscaping to reduce mainte- nance and promote plant and wildlife conservation. This manual will show you how to use native plants to cre- ate and maintain diverse and beauti- ful spaces. It describes new ways to garden lightly on the earth. Chapter Four: Landscaping with Native Plants provides tools garden- ers need to create and maintain suc- cessful native plant gardens. The information included here provides practical tips and details to ensure successful low-maintenance land- scapes. The previous three chap- ters include Reconstructing Tallgrass Prairies, Rain Gardening, and Native landscapes in the Whitmire Wildflower Garden, Shaw Nature Reserve. Control and Identification of Invasive Species. use of native plants in residential gar- den design, farming, parks, roadsides, and prairie restoration. Miller called his History of Native work “The Prairie Spirit in Landscape Landscaping Design”. One of the earliest practitioners of An early proponent of native landscap- Miller’s ideas was Ossian C. Simonds, ing was Wilhelm Miller who was a landscape architect who worked in appointed head of the University of the Chicago region. In a lecture pre- Illinois extension program in 1912. He sented in 1922, Simonds said, “Nature published a number of papers on the Introduction 3 teaches what to plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Willow (Itea Virginica)
    Virginia willow (Itea virginica) For definitions of botanical terms, visit en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_botanical_terms. Virginia willow is an erect to spreading shrub with showy spikes of tiny white flowers that bloom in late winter through early summer. It occurs naturally in floodplain swamps, seepage slopes, stream and lake edges, and calcareous and mesic hammocks. The plant provides food and cover for wildlife. The inflorescence is a dense terminal spike-like raceme that droops downward. Individual flowers are star- shaped, with five white to pinkish petals and a five-lobed, cup-shaped calyx. Stamens are creamy white with pale pinkish anthers. Ovary and pistil are Photo by Keith Bradley prominent. The dark green, leathery leaves are elliptic to obovate with finely toothed margins and pointed tips. They are petiolate and alternately arranged. In the fall, leaf color changes to orange, red, burgundy or purple. Branches are slender and arching. Seeds are born in inconspicuous brown capsules. Despite its common name, Virginia willow is not a true willow, which are members of the Salix genus in the Salicaceae family. It is also known as Sweetspire and Tassel-white. Family: Iteaceae (Sweetspire family) Native range: Nearly throughout, less in southernmost counties To see where natural populations of Virginia willow have been vouchered, visit www.florida.plantatlas.usf.edu. Hardiness: Zones 8–10 Lifespan: Perennial Soil: Moist to wet, poor to well-drained, acidic sandy, loamy or clay soils Exposure: Mostly shade, but can sometimes tolerate full sun Growth habit: 6–10’ tall with spread of up to 6’ Propagation: Cuttings, seed Garden tips: Virginia willow is best suited for naturalistic or restoration landscapes and in plantings along retention pond edges, streams and other riparian zones where its suckering habit may assist with soil stabilization.
    [Show full text]