DOCSLIB.ORG

Intraspecific Molecular Phylogeny in the Yellow Warbler (Dendroica Petechia), and Implications for Avian Biogeography in the West Indies

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intraspecific Molecular Phylogeny in the Yellow Warbler (Dendroica Petechia), and Implications for Avian Biogeography in the West Indies Evolution, 48(6), 1994, pp, 1914-1932 INTRASPECIFIC MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY IN THE YELLOW WARBLER (DENDROICA PETECHIA), AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AVIAN BIOGEOGRAPHY IN THE WEST INDIES NEDRA K. KLEIN'AND WESLEY M. BROWN Museum ojZoology and Department ofBiology, University ojMichigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 E-mail: Wesley.Brownenon.cc.umich.edu Abstract.-A phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) restriction sites was used to examine the evolutionary history of populations of yellow warbler (Dendroica petechia) sampled from North America, Central America, South America, and the West Indies. Thirty-seven hap­ lotypes were identified, and only one was found in more than one of these regions. Estimated sequence divergence among haplotypes ranged from 0.14 to 3.17%, and mtDNAs from North American migratory populations clearly were differentiated from those ofmost tropical sedentary populations. Parsimony analysis ofhaplotypes suggested multiple colonizations ofthe West Indies archipelago and of individual Caribbean islands. The inference of multiple colonizations has important implications for studies ofavian ecology and evolution in this region. Key words.-Bird, Caribbean region, Dendroica petechia, island biogeography, mtDNA, phylogeny, West Indies. Received September 28, 1992. Accepted March 18, 1994. Studies of island biogeography have contrib­ er taxa, and most likely have arrived at their uted greatly to our understanding of ecological present distributions via dispersal from sur­ andevolutionary processes (MacArthurand Wil­ rounding continental areas and from other is­ son 1963, 1967; Lack 1976; Berry 1983; Wil­ lands (Bond 1963, 1978; Seutin et al. 1993). liams 1989). Such inferences about process can Nevertheless, testable predictions of sources become even more powerful, however, when they of colonists can be made based on distances to are made within an historical framework pro­ the nearest land masses. In a series ofpapers on vided by estimates of phylogenetic relationship WestIndian birds, Bond (1948, 1961, 1963, 1978, among island populations and species (Rosen 1979, 1993) documented distributions and dis­ 1975; Eldredge and Cracraft 1980; Wiley 1981; cussed taxonomic relationships of West Indian Guyer and Savage 1986; Kluge 1988; Miller and birds. Basing his hypotheses on current faunal Miller 1989). distributions, phenotypic similarities, and in­ Caribbean islands have acquired their fauna ferred affinities to mainland groups, he proposed eitherfrom overwaterdispersal (Darlington 1938; two main sources of the Caribbean avifauna: Bond 1963, 1978; Pregill198l; Koopman 1989), northern South America for many ofthe Lesser or as relicts through fragmentation ofa formerly Antillean species, and Central and North Amer­ widespread distribution (Rosen 1975; Kluge ica for Greater Antillean and some Lesser An­ 1988). Vicariance explanations of distribution tillean species. He proposed multiple coloniza­ and evolutionary diversification have been pro­ tions from these sources for island populations posed for several faunal groups on Caribbean of widespread species. islands (Rosen 1975; Kluge 1988; Miller and Whether single or multiple colonizations have Miller 1989). However, many avian species are occurred in the West Indies is an important dis­ too recent in origin (Brodkorb 1971; Feduccia tinction for inferences about evolution within and Martin 1976; Feduccia 1977; Olson 1985) this region. The implication ofa widespread spe­ for the vicariance explanations proposed for oth- cies having colonized the archipelago multiple times from different sources is that island pop­ ulations would not constitute a monophyletic group and would thus not be each others' closest I Present address: Department ofOrnithology, Amer­ relatives. Monophyly ofisland populations is an ican Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th, New York, NY 10024-5192, E-mail: implicit assumption of many evolutionary and [email protected]. ecological studies of species on archipelagoes 1914 © 1994 The Society for the Study ofEvolution. All rights reserved. YELLOW WARBLER MTDNA PHYLOGENY 1915 (MacArthur and Wilson 1967; Ricklefs and Cox We present here an estimate of the phyloge­ 1972, 1978). netic relationships among populations ofyellow Another assumption of many island biogeo­ warbler (Dendroica petechia), a widespread, pol­ graphic studies ofcolonizing species is that pop­ ytypic avian species. The phylogenetic recon­ ulations on adjacent islands are each others' clos­ struction is based on a restriction endonuclease est relatives; that is, their distributions are the analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). We result ofa stepping-stone process ofcolonization use the mtDNA phylogeny to examine the evo­ (Darlington 1938; MacArthur and Wilson 1967; lutionary history of resident populations in the Ricklefs and Cox 1972, 1978). An alternative is West Indies and tropical continental areas. We a colonization pattern that is random with re­ test the hypothesis that the West Indies has been spect to geography. Under the stepping-stone colonized multiple times by different source pop­ model, islands arranged linearly (e.g., the Lesser ulations ofyellow warbler, as suggested by Bond Antilles) are colonized sequentially, beginning (1963, 1978) for widespread Caribbean birds. If with that closest to the mainland source (Wil­ multiple colonizations have occurred, the Carib­ liams 1989). Individual island populations would bean samples should not form a monophyletic be derived from those on other islands or the group relative to othersamples. The analysis also adjacent mainland, and heritable differences is used to infer colonization sources, as has been among them should thus be due to selection or done for other groups ofisland organisms (Ash­ random differentiation processes rather than to ley and Wills 1987; Phillips et al. 1989), and to different phylogenetic histories. If, however, a test the critical prediction of the stepping-stone widespread species has colonized the archipelago colonization model that populations on adjacent multipletimesfrom different source populations, islands are closely related to each other. there may be areas where populations on adja­ cent islands are descendants ofdifferent ancestral METHODS colonizers. Differences among such populations Specimens were collected by shotgun or mist may thus be due to their different genealogies. net from 1986-1990. A total of 194 yellow war­ A phylogenetic inference of relationships blers was used in this study. General localities among island and mainland populations of a and sample sizes were: Michigan (17), North widespread taxon is useful both because it allows Carolina (9), Washington (6), Baja California (1), testing the models of single and multiple colo­ Florida Keys (1), Jamaica (9), Dominican Re­ nizations of archipelagoes (different patterns of public (10), Puerto Rico (17), U.S. Virgin Islands relationship are predicted under each) and be­ (24), Montserrat (8), Guadeloupe (5), Dominica cause potential interpretive problems associated (6), Martinique (4), St. Lucia (4), Venezuela (40), with missing taxa (islands that were never col­ Panama (13), Costa Rica (20). Populations from onized or whose populations have been extir­ Michigan, North Carolina, and Washington are pated) can be eliminated. Under the model of a wholly migratory. The rest are wholly sedentary single colonization ofan archipelago, monophyly tropical residents. of island populations is predicted. Polyphyly is Although a few estimates of historical rela­ predicted under the multiple-colonization mod­ tionships among paruline warblers exist (Mengel el, provided founders came from different source 1964; Barrowclough and Corbin 1978; Raikow populations. It is difficult to test models ofisland 1978; Bledsoe 1988; Sibley and Ahlquist 1990), colonization pattern within archipelagoes, how­ none of the studies include Dendroica petechia. ever, because (1) any tree topology is consistent Preliminary allozyme evidence (Avise et al. 1980) with a random colonization model (i.e., the ran­ suggests that the yellow warbler may fall outside dom model is not falsifiable), and (2) although a ofa group consisting ofother Dendroica. In the pectinate tree is predicted under the stepping­ absence ofan explicit hypothesis ofrelationship stone model, if colonization has occurred rap­ among D. petechia and other warblers, choice of idly, or if there has been any postcolonization outgroup taxa was done with the goal ofencom­ movement among islands, the comblike pattern passinga wide range ofinferred divergence levels ofhistorical relationship will not be recoverable. relative to the ingroup (Maddison et al. 1984). Nevertheless, one can test the prediction of the Outgroup species (with sample sizes and locali­ stepping-stone model that populations on adja­ ties) were: D. pensylvanica (2, Michigan), D. dis­ cent islands should be each others' closest rela­ color (2, Florida), Setophaga ruticilla (1, Mich­ tives. igan), Parula americana (1, North Carolina), 1916 N. K. KLEIN AND W. M. BROWN Geothlypis triehas (2, Michigan), and Basileute­ passing the geographic range ofsamples) digested rus eulicivorus (I, Venezuela). All outgroups ex­ with that enzyme were run together on one set ceptB. eulicivorus are migratory NorthAmerican of agarose and polyacrylamide gels to facilitate species. Basileuterus is a wholly sedentary, Neo­ comparison of fragment sizes among different tropical genus that is the probable sister taxon haplotypes. Other gel sets
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report
    MIOMBO ECOREGION VISION REPORT Jonathan Timberlake & Emmanuel Chidumayo December 2001 (published 2011) Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 20 WWF - SARPO MIOMBO ECOREGION VISION REPORT 2001 (revised August 2011) by Jonathan Timberlake & Emmanuel Chidumayo Occasional Publications in Biodiversity No. 20 Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P.O. Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe PREFACE The Miombo Ecoregion Vision Report was commissioned in 2001 by the Southern Africa Regional Programme Office of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF SARPO). It represented the culmination of an ecoregion reconnaissance process led by Bruce Byers (see Byers 2001a, 2001b), followed by an ecoregion-scale mapping process of taxa and areas of interest or importance for various ecological and bio-physical parameters. The report was then used as a basis for more detailed discussions during a series of national workshops held across the region in the early part of 2002. The main purpose of the reconnaissance and visioning process was to initially outline the bio-physical extent and properties of the so-called Miombo Ecoregion (in practice, a collection of smaller previously described ecoregions), to identify the main areas of potential conservation interest and to identify appropriate activities and areas for conservation action. The outline and some features of the Miombo Ecoregion (later termed the Miombo– Mopane Ecoregion by Conservation International, or the Miombo–Mopane Woodlands and Grasslands) are often mentioned (e.g. Burgess et al. 2004). However, apart from two booklets (WWF SARPO 2001, 2003), few details or justifications are publically available, although a modified outline can be found in Frost, Timberlake & Chidumayo (2002). Over the years numerous requests have been made to use and refer to the original document and maps, which had only very restricted distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Unlocking the Black Box of Feather Louse Diversity: a Molecular Phylogeny of the Hyper-Diverse Genus Brueelia Q ⇑ Sarah E
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 94 (2016) 737–751 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Unlocking the black box of feather louse diversity: A molecular phylogeny of the hyper-diverse genus Brueelia q ⇑ Sarah E. Bush a, , Jason D. Weckstein b,1, Daniel R. Gustafsson a, Julie Allen c, Emily DiBlasi a, Scott M. Shreve c,2, Rachel Boldt c, Heather R. Skeen b,3, Kevin P. Johnson c a Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA b Field Museum of Natural History, Science and Education, Integrative Research Center, 1400 S. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605, USA c Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois, 1816 South Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA article info abstract Article history: Songbirds host one of the largest, and most poorly understood, groups of lice: the Brueelia-complex. The Received 21 May 2015 Brueelia-complex contains nearly one-tenth of all known louse species (Phthiraptera), and the genus Revised 15 September 2015 Brueelia has over 300 species. To date, revisions have been confounded by extreme morphological Accepted 18 September 2015 variation, convergent evolution, and periodic movement of lice between unrelated hosts. Here we use Available online 9 October 2015 Bayesian inference based on mitochondrial (COI) and nuclear (EF-1a) gene fragments to analyze the phylogenetic relationships among 333 individuals within the Brueelia-complex. We show that the genus Keywords: Brueelia, as it is currently recognized, is paraphyletic. Many well-supported and morphologically unified Brueelia clades within our phylogenetic reconstruction of Brueelia were previously described as genera.
    [Show full text]
  • NESTLING MOUTH Marklngs It '" "' of OLD WORLD FINCHES ESTLLU MIMICRY and COEVOLUTION of NESTING
    NESTLING MOUTH MARklNGS It '" "' OF OLD WORLD FINCHES ESTLLU MIMICRY AND COEVOLUTION OF NESTING r - .. ;.-; 5.i A&+.FINCHES .-. '4 AND THEIR VIDUA BROOD PARASITES - . , , . :.. - i ' -, ,' $*.$$>&.--: 7 -.: ',"L dt$=%>df;$..;,4;x.;b,?b;.:, ;.:. -, ! ,I Vt .., . k., . .,.-. , .is: 8, :. BY ERT B. PAYNE MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 194 Ann ntwi day, 2005 lSSN 0076-8405 PUBLICATIONS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN NO. 194 J. B. BLJR(.H,Editor JI.:NNIFERFBLMLEE, Assistcint Editor The publications of the Museum of Zoology, The University of Michigan, consist primarily of two series-the Mi.scel/aneous Pziblications and the Occa.siona1 Papers. Both series were founded by Dr. Bryant Walker, Mr. Bradshaw H. Swales, and Dr. W.W. Newcomb. Occasionally thc Museum publishes contributions outside of these series; beginning in 1990 thcsc arc titled Special Publications and arc numbered. All submitted manuscripts to any of the Museum's publications receive external review. The Occasional Papers, begun in 1913, serve as a medium for original studies based principally upon the collections in the Museum. They arc issued separately. When a sufficient number of pages has been printed to make a volume, a title page, table of contents, and an index are supplied to libraries and individuals on the mailing list for the series. The Miscellaneotls Pt~hlication.~,initiated in 1916, include monographic studies, papers on field and museum techniques, and other contributions not within the scope of the Occasional Papers, and are published separately. It is not intended that they be grouped into volurnes. Each number has a title page and, when necessary, a table of contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Vital but Vulnerable: Climate Change Vulnerability and Human Use of Wildlife in Africa’S Albertine Rift
    Vital but vulnerable: Climate change vulnerability and human use of wildlife in Africa’s Albertine Rift J.A. Carr, W.E. Outhwaite, G.L. Goodman, T.E.E. Oldfield and W.B. Foden Occasional Paper for the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 48 The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or the compilers concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN or other participating organizations. Published by: IUCN, Gland, Switzerland Copyright: © 2013 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Carr, J.A., Outhwaite, W.E., Goodman, G.L., Oldfield, T.E.E. and Foden, W.B. 2013. Vital but vulnerable: Climate change vulnerability and human use of wildlife in Africa’s Albertine Rift. Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission No. 48. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. xii + 224pp. ISBN: 978-2-8317-1591-9 Front cover: A Burundian fisherman makes a good catch. © R. Allgayer and A. Sapoli. Back cover: © T. Knowles Available from: IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature) Publications Services Rue Mauverney 28 1196 Gland Switzerland Tel +41 22 999 0000 Fax +41 22 999 0020 [email protected] www.iucn.org/publications Also available at http://www.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/edocs/SSC-OP-048.pdf About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa Mega II Trip Report 8Th October to 1St November 2016
    South Africa Mega II Trip Report 8th October to 1st November 2016 Drakensberg Rockjumper by Adam Riley Trip report compiled by Tour Leader: Andre Bernon RBT South Africa – Mega II Trip Report 2016 2 Top 10 birds seen on the trip (as voted by the participants) 1. Drakensberg Rockjumper 2. Blue Crane 3. Botha’s Lark 4. Cape Rockjumper 5. African Penguin 6. Eastern Bronze-naped Pigeon 7. Pink-throated Twinspot 8. Cape Sugarbird 9. Blue Swallow 10. Spotted Eagle-Owl Tour Summary The southern African sub-region has one of the highest number of endemic and near-endemic bird species on the continent. This, coupled with great infrastructure, makes South Africa a highly rewarding country to explore. Our first day was set to be an arrival day where everyone was met by their Rockjumper tour leader at our accommodation in South Africa’s largest city - Johannesburg. This did not stop us from ticking off a few bird species; these came in the form of Karoo Thrush, Crested Barbet, Cape Robin-Chat, Red- headed Finch, Cape Wagtail, Southern Masked Weaver and Southern Red Bishop. After an introductory chat during our first dinner together, talking about the day planned ahead, we made our way to bed in preparation for an early start the following morning. We managed to leave before sunrise and arrived at our first birding destination north of Pretoria, in the Rust de Winter area, when the temperature was still cool and the sky a bit overcast. This aided us in our birding success as we managed to get great views of some target species reaching their easternmost distribution here.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds, Reptiles, Fish, Insects, Aquatic Invertebrates and Ecosystems
    AWF FOUR CORNERS TBNRM PROJECT : REVIEWS OF EXISTING BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION i Published for The African Wildlife Foundation's FOUR CORNERS TBNRM PROJECT by THE ZAMBEZI SOCIETY and THE BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR AFRICA 2004 PARTNERS IN BIODIVERSITY The Zambezi Society The Biodiversity Foundation for Africa P O Box HG774 P O Box FM730 Highlands Famona Harare Bulawayo Zimbabwe Zimbabwe Tel: +263 4 747002-5 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.biodiversityfoundation.org Website : www.zamsoc.org The Zambezi Society and The Biodiversity Foundation for Africa are working as partners within the African Wildlife Foundation's Four Corners TBNRM project. The Biodiversity Foundation for Africa is responsible for acquiring technical information on the biodiversity of the project area. The Zambezi Society will be interpreting this information into user-friendly formats for stakeholders in the Four Corners area, and then disseminating it to these stakeholders. THE BIODIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR AFRICA (BFA is a non-profit making Trust, formed in Bulawayo in 1992 by a group of concerned scientists and environmentalists. Individual BFA members have expertise in biological groups including plants, vegetation, mammals, birds, reptiles, fish, insects, aquatic invertebrates and ecosystems. The major objective of the BFA is to undertake biological research into the biodiversity of sub-Saharan Africa, and to make the resulting information more accessible. Towards this end it provides technical, ecological and biosystematic expertise. THE ZAMBEZI SOCIETY was established in 1982. Its goals include the conservation of biological diversity and wilderness in the Zambezi Basin through the application of sustainable, scientifically sound natural resource management strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Selection in Estrildid Finches, with Further Review of the Evolution of Nesting Material Holding Display in Relation to Cooperative Parental Nesting
    The Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology, 68, 2, 121-130 (2018) Lecture Sexual selection in Estrildid finches, with further review of the evolution of nesting material holding display in relation to cooperative parental nesting MASAYO SOMA１） Abstract Estrildid finches (family: Estrildidae) are characterised by great intraspecific and intersexual variations in sexual traits, which include courtship song, dance and ornamental colourations of plumage. These features are expected to help us answer some questions about the evolution of sexual signals: (1) why multiple ornaments evolve in socially monogamous species; and (2) why, in certain species, males and females share identical sexual traits. To discuss these, first, I briefly review the past phylogenetic comparative studies of Estrildids and show that the three sexual traits evolved independently. Secondly, I focus on one behavioural component of the courtship dance, nesting material holding display, and test the idea that the display evolved as a signal of nest building ability using phylogenetic comparative approaches. The results showed that males exhibited nesting material holding displays in species where males tend to work harder to prepare nests, which indicates that parental cooperation plays a role in the evolution of sexual signals. Key words：courtship display, Estrildid finches, nest-building, sexual selection, songbird 1. Introduction: The multiple sexual traits of the evolution of birdsong, i.e. mechanisms of Estrildid finches vocal (song) learning, and sexual selection on Estrildid finches (family: Estrildidae) are birdsong (Zann, 1996; Brainard & Doupe, gaining considerable popularity in ethology, 2002; Riebel, 2009; Okanoya, 2004a; Okanoya, comparative cognitive science, neurobehavioral 2004b). In contrast with male song, however, biology, and their related disciplines in recent other intriguing features of Estrildid finches decades, mostly due to the intensive birdsong tend to be neglected.
    [Show full text]
  • Vertebrate Pests Committee List of Exotic Vertebrate Animals in Australia, May 2003……………………………………………………
    Vertebrate Pests Committee List of Exotic Vertebrate Animals in Australia May 2003 Contact Details Background Vertebrate Pests Committee Secretary All species on this list (excluding those with B or C c\o Land Protection annotations) form a definitive record of the non- Department of Natural Resources & Mines indigenous vertebrate mammals, birds, amphibians GPO Box 2454 and reptiles held in Australia under State and Territory BRISBANE QLD 4001 legislation. (It is the responsibility of the holder of an Tel. 07 3405 5540 individual animal to ensure that they are also Fax. 07 3405 5551 compliant with Commonwealth legislation relating to Mobile. the possession and quarantine of exotic animals.) Email. [email protected] This list should be used as a reference by the Vertebrate Pests Committee and Commonwealth, Sustainable Wildlife Industries State and Territory agencies in controlling the entry, Environment Australia movement and keeping of exotic vertebrate animals. GPO Box 787 CANBERRA ACT 2601 This list may be subject to change from time to time Tel. 02 6274 2880 (with VPC approval), to incorporate changes in the Fax. 02 6274 1921Email. [email protected] taxonomic name of species. It may also be changed where additions have been made through the legal importation of new exotic species into Australia under References the provisions of the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and the Christidis, L. and Boles, W. E. 1994. The Taxonomy Quarantine Act 1908. and Species of Birds of Australia and its Territories. RAOU Monograph 2. Each species, unless otherwise stated, has so far only be subjected to a general assessment of the risk it Frost, N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Indigenous Animals Regulation 2012
    Non-Indigenous Animals Regulation 2012 As at 4 January 2013 Part 1 – Preliminary 1 Name of Regulation This Regulation is the Non-Indigenous Animals Regulation 2012. 2 Commencement This Regulation commences on 1 September 2012 and is required to be published on the NSW legislation website. This Regulation replaces the Non-Indigenous Animals Regulation 2006 which is repealed on 1 September 2012 by section 10 (2) of the Subordinate Legislation Act 1989. 3 Definitions (1) In this Regulation:"classified" means classified by this Regulation for the purposes of section 6 (d) of the Act."controlled category animal" means a category 1a, 1b, 2, 3a or 3b animal."dangerous animal" means a non-indigenous animal of a controlled category: (a) of a species whose members ordinarily pose a significant risk of death or injury to any person (such as a tiger, lion or bear), or (b) that, because of its particular disposition, health or other condition, poses a significant risk of death or injury to any person. "ear tag" means a tag, label or other means of identification of animals that contains an electronic radio frequency identification device encoded with a unique, unalterable number that is registered in accordance with the scheme for the identification of stock established under the Stock Diseases Act 1923."enclosure" includes a cage or other structure in which an animal is kept or is treated for illness or injury."exhibit", in relation to an animal, means display the animal, or keep the animal for display, for educational, cultural, scientific, entertainment or other purposes prescribed under the Exhibited Animals Protection Act 1986, but does not include display the animal, or keep it for display, solely: (a) in connection with the sale or intended sale of the animal, or (b) for animal research, within the meaning of the Animal Research Act 1985, or (c) in circumstances declared by a regulation under the Exhibited Animals Protection Act 1986 not to constitute an exhibition of the animal for the purposes of that Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Parasitism, Mimicry and Speciation in the Indigobirds and Whydahs of Africa
    BIOLOGY big little liars Parasitism, mimicry and speciation in the indigobirds and whydahs of Africa TEXT GabrieL A. JAMIE It’s the start of the rains in southern Zambia and a small, glossy black finch is singing incessantly from the top of an exposed tree. The song is mostly a hurried ramble of chatters and scratchy warbles, but occasionally the bird intersperses trills and tinkling notes that sound nearly identical to those of a lo- cal species of firefinch. This seemingly inconsequential observation hints at a fascinating evolutionary story unfolding in woodlands and savannas throughout Africa. he finch is an indigobird, a member of the family Viduidae that also includes the whydahs Tand Cuckoo Finch. As the latter’s name suggests, the family’s reproductive be- haviour shares similarities with that of many cuckoos. Rather than constructing a nest, incubating eggs and feeding young, they adopt a ‘brood-parasitic’ lifestyle, depositing their eggs in the nests of other birds and letting them do all the work. As strategies go, it’s a good one. Rear- ing offspring is a time-consuming and energy-intensive endeavour. While off- spring are young and unable to care for themselves, parents must return fre- quently to the nest site to bring food, carry out nest maintenance and defend their chicks from predators. This se- WARWICK TARBOTON verely curtails the adult’s mobility and parental care, they free up time and en- A male Long-tailed Paradise Whydah increases its own susceptibility to attack. ergy for producing more eggs. These (opposite) surveys his territory. As a nestling, What’s more, the adult literally has all eggs can then be spread across many this bird would have grown up in the nest of its eggs in one basket.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypergerus Atriceps), Green Hylia (Hylia Prasina) and Tit-Hylia (Pholidornis Rushiae)
    Ostrich 2003, 74(1&2): 8–17 Copyright © Birdlife South Africa Printed in South Africa — All rights reserved OSTRICH ISSN 0030–6525 Phylogenetic relationships of African sunbird-like warblers: Moho (Hypergerus atriceps), Green Hylia (Hylia prasina) and Tit-hylia (Pholidornis rushiae) Kristina M Sefc1*, Robert B Payne2,3 and Michael D Sorenson1,2 1 Department of Biology, Boston University, 5 Cummington Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA 2 Museum of Zoology and 3 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA * Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Pholidornis, Hylia, and Hypergerus are monotypic songbird genera that share insectivorous feeding habits and a common habitat in West African forests. Each of these genera has some sunbird-like characters as well as other characters that sug- gest affinities to sylvioid warblers. We briefly review previous phylogenetic hypotheses for these taxa and then present an analysis based on over 2 000 bases of mitochondrial sequence data for a broad range of Old World songbirds representing most families in Sibley and Ahlquist’s (1990) superfamilies Passeroidea and Sylvioidea. Our analyses confirm the placement of Hypergerus and its sister taxon Eminia within a larger monophyletic family of African warblers Cisticolidae. We also find strong support for a sister relationship between Pholidornis and Hylia and evidence that this clade represents just one line- age in a diverse assemblage of Old World warblers that is probably paraphyletic or polyphyletic with respect to other sylvioid families. While a definitive placement of the Pholidornis/Hylia clade within Sylvioidea was not possible, a number of specific previous hypotheses can now be rejected: Pholidornis and Hylia are not closely related to sunbirds Nectariniidae, estrildid finches Estrildidae, or honey-eaters Meliphagidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Botswana Species Checklist
    BOTSWANA SPECIES CHECKLIST InCLudes VICTORIA Falls/LIVIngstonE AFRICA VEGETATION MAP BIOMES Desert (namib; Sahara; danakil) Semi-desert (Karoo; Sahel; Chalbi) Arid savannAH (Kalahari; Masai Steppe; Ogaden) Grassland (Highveld; Abyssinian) SEYCHELLES MEditerranean ScruB / FYnBOS East African Coastal Forest & ScruB Dry WOOdland (including Mopane) Moist woodland (including Miombo) Tropical RAInforest (Congo Basin; upper guinea) Afro-MOntanE Forest & Grassland (drakensberg; nyika; Albertine Rift; Abyssinian Highlands) Granitic IndIAn Ocean IslandS (Seychelles) INTRODUCTION Welcome to the wonderful wildlife of southern Africa. The idea of this booklet is to enable you, as a Wilderness Safaris guest, to keep a detailed record of the mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians that that you observed during your travels. It also serves as a compact record of your African journey for future reference and enjoyment that hopefully sparks interest in other wildlife spheres whether in your home country or abroad. Although always exciting to see, especially for the first-time Africa visitor, once you move beyond the cliché of the ‘Big Five’ you will soon realise that our wilderness areas offer much more. Africa’s large mammals are certainly a big attraction that one never tires of, but it’s often the smaller mammals, diverse birdlife and incredible reptiles that draw one back again and again for another unparalleled visit. Seeing a breeding herd of elephant for instance will always be special but there is a certain thrill in seeing a sitatunga, a serval or a Pel’s fishing-owl – to name but a few. As a globally discerning traveller, look beyond the obvious, and challenge yourself to learn as much about the wildlife and ecosystems through which you will travel on your safari.
    [Show full text]