Nevadagascar Article Final Proof CSJ Nov 2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nevadagascar Article Final Proof CSJ Nov 2005 Special Conservation Report ing cactus and succuelnt species not adapted to humans with a fantastically diverse mix of dry burning. The problem is only likely to get worse tropical forest, seasonally arid deciduous wood- unless controls can be found for the most prob- land, and near-desert scrub located primarily in Nevadagascar? lematic weeds. the western half of the island. The eastern half contains an equally rich and varied mix of other The Threat that Invasive Weeds and Wildfires Pose Madagascar is well-known habitat types less conducive to succulents includ- to naturalists and biologists all over the globe for ing belts of wet tropical forest, cloud forest, man- to our North American Desert Biomes its rich biotic diversity and its marvelous array grove swamp, and evergreen mountain forest. of unique and endemic plants and animals. Unlike most of earth’s large landmasses, Part 1: The Mojave Desert and Joshua Tree woodlands Of course lovers of succulent and caudiciform Madagascar was populated by humans only 1500 plants are familiar with many natives of this fan- years ago. Groups of Indo-Malayan, African and tastic land. Some of the most charismatic and Arabian peoples arrived over the centuries begin- JAN EMMING widely-appreciated succulent and xeric plants ning about 500 AD, and each successive wave took are native to this country, including many its toll upon the island’s environment. Many of the pachypodiums, euphorbias, aloes, and seven of largest and most unusual animals were quickly the eight species of baobab trees in the genus hunted into extinction, and the remaining spe- t is ironic that, Adansonia. These plants need little introduc- cies of fauna are in most cases suffering severely Figure 1 Joshua Trees growing in a dense 60 cm tall stand of while the well- cheatgrass in Delamar Valley, Lincoln County, Nevada. tion to most succulentists, and certain repre- reduced populations and/or near extinction every- used term sentatives of these genera are even recognized where they come into contact with humanity. “desertification” by novice gardeners as houseplants. Naturally, the plants have suffered badly since of semiarid grass- Located primarily in the tropical and subtropi- the arrival of humankind as well. A social system lands and savan- cal arid and semiarid zones that sandwich the wet developed among the newly-arrived Malagasy nas like those equatorial tropics (mainly from approximately 25 peoples that values the possession of large num- of sub-Saharan to 40 degrees north and south in latitude), much bers of zebu cattle as a measure of social status Africa is taken correctly of Madagascar was covered before the arrival of and personal wealth. As such, a regime of regular, Ito mean a decline of the native ecosystem into barren desert, something Figure 2 Joshua Tree woodland, western resembling the reverse slope of Delamar Mountains, Lincoln is happening in North County, Nevada. America. We are see- ing diverse native desert communities suffering a decline into degraded weedy grasslands with but a fraction of their former diversity. In fact, many ecosystems worldwide (both wet and dry) are experiencing a shift away from diverse native floras and being replaced by similar-looking, though highly despoiled habitats with a relatively few spe- cies adapted to human disturbance: weeds. In the North American West and Southwest, a heavy infestation of inva- sive alien weeds, spurred by the very wet winter of 2004–05, have fueled unprecedented wildfires in our deserts and semi- arid regions, threatening the survival of slow-grow- 2 CACTUS AND SUCCULENT JOURNAL 2005 VOLUME 77 NUMBER 6 3 Figure 5 (Top) Destruction by fire of a high-density, mature, centuries-old grove of Joshua Trees. Although it is hard to date the precise age of Joshua Trees, based upon average annual growth rates the largest of these trees are at least 200–300 years old. Figure 6 (Bottom) The foothills of the Beaver Dam Mountain Range in southwestern Washington County, Utah, sport a dust devil that vacuums up the ash remaining from the Westside Fire complex, which burned through the region in late June, 2005. The cacti are mainly Buckhorn Chollas, and the other yuccas are Banana Yuccas. Figure 3 (Top) View of the Delamar Fire in the distant foothills of the Delamar Mountains. Fire- carrying Cheatgrass in the foreground Joshua Tree forest is so thick that only the tops of the native blackbrush and sagebrush shrubs are visible amongst the grasses. Figure 4 (Bottom) A sweep of (former) Joshua Tree forest burned near Lime Mountain, Nevada east to the Beaver Dam Mountains, Utah. and in most cases virtually annual, fires has been fire-tolerant native plants. This exchange of one implemented to encourage the growth of grasses natural ecosystem for another far less diverse one palatable to cattle. This has resulted in the near is especially apparent in the semiarid and season- total displacement of forests across most of the ally dry zones more conducive to cattle-raising2. island by non-native savanna. The gloriously Of course, our cultural love affair with the diverse natural ecosystem of Madagascar that cowboy myth notwithstanding, America’s use of once existed is today little more than an impover- cattle has little to do with the destruction by fire ished selection of a few non-native grasses inter- of the North American Deserts. So why are fires spersed with a drastically reduced selection of threatening ecosystems here? 4 CACTUS AND SUCCULENT JOURNAL 2005 VOLUME 77 NUMBER 6 5 Figure 7 (Top) A collection of Red Barrel Cacti, including a rare crested specimen, killed by the passage of the 350,000 acre Duzak Fire near Lime Mountain in Lincoln County, Nevada. Figure 8 (Bottom) Steep, succulent-diverse limestone hills above Bull Valley Wash near Upper Lime Mountain Well in Lincoln County, Nevada. Succulents in this photo include Red Barrel Cactus, Engelmann Hedgehog, Buckhorn Cholla and the flowering spikes of Utah Agave. Fires are not a natural part of most desert com- munities worldwide. In fact, if there are any desert biomes on Earth that experience widespread fires on a regular basis, I am unaware of them. This is counterintuitive, because deserts are such dry environments; one would think they ought to be extremely fire-prone. But it is precisely the aridity of deserts that prevents them from experiencing fires. The native vegetation is typically too sparse to support the spread of flames from one plant to another. Thus, a wetter, better-vegetated ecologi- cal community such as chaparral, pinon-juniper scrub, or montane evergreen forest is more prone to being periodically scorched than a desert nor- mally ever would be. Figure 9 A grove of Joshua Trees, possibly of the variant Yucca brevifolia var jaegeriana, Many non-desert life zones require periodic stands at the upper limits of Joshua Tree habitat as it transitions into Pinon-Juniper woodland burning of low to moderate intensity for best eco- on a hill in the Bull Valley Wash drainage of Nevada. Such plants might be able to recover logical health and optimal diversity. Some plants from fire from the root zone, unlike most lower-altitude, true desert Joshua Trees, which gen- in these communities cannot reproduce without erally reproduce from seed. a scorching by fire, and many of them have devel- oped strategies to live through and even to benefit are colonizing desert ecosystems, filling in the native ecological functioning and integrity. from fire and the years immediately afterward blank spaces between plants, and promoting There are at least two main dangers asso- one. But none of these qualities is shared by most large-scale fires in a community entirely unable ciated with invasive weeds: First, they sim- desert plants or ecosystems. The large majority to cope with such hazards. ply crowd and out-compete native species or of succulent plants cannot withstand even a mild These culprit species in the American their seedlings for limited water and nutrient burning, much less an outright immolation, and Southwest include grasses such as Cheatgrass resources by germinating earlier, faster, or their populations would suffer tremendously for (Bromus tectorum), Red Brome Grass (B. more densely than natives can with the effect many decades if fire were to ever rear its orange rubens), Buffelgrass (Pennisetum ciliare), of reducing native plant density and diversity. head in the deserts of North America. Fountain Grass (P. setaceum) and Mediterranean For instance, once glorious displays of annual But fires have become a regular feature in grasses (Schismus barbatus and S. arabicus) desert wildflowers like Mexican Goldpoppy, all four of the North American deserts. How did along with weedy annual forbs (broad leaved Sand Verbena, Evening Primrose, Lupine, and this happen? The answer lies primarily with herbs other than grasses) such as Red-leaved Owl’s Clover have diminished in recent years. non-native, invasive weeds, which arrived as a Filaree (Erodium cicutarium), Sahara Mustard And while adult perennial species can survive side effect of human activity. There is a handful (Brassica tournefortii), several knapweeds the onslaught from annual weeds, seedlings may of aggressive species with an uncanny ability to and Yellow Star Thistle (Centaurea spp) and have trouble becoming established. rapidly reproduce and spread into untouched Oriental Hedge Mustard (Sisymbrium orien- The second and graver threat is fire. September terrain. There are two main reasons the term tale). All of these plants are non-native (primar- 2004 to March 2005 was one of the wettest periods invasive is used to describe these plants. The ily African and Eurasian species), and all have on record in the southwest. The Mojave Desert first is that they spread unaided by human become firmly established in the desert habitats regions, spanning from southeastern California effort.
Recommended publications
  • ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona
    October 2015 BLM DOI-BLM-AZ-0000-2013-0001-EA ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona Final Environmental Assessment Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation ADOT Herbicide Treatment Program on Bureau of Land Management Lands in Arizona DOI-BLM-AZ-0000-2013-0001-EA Bureau of Land Management Arizona State Office One North Central Avenue, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4427 October 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. iii Acronym List ................................................................................................................................... iv Section 1 – Proposed Action, Purpose and Need, and Background Information ........................... 1 1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Proposed Action Overview ............................................................................................... 3 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Uranium 2001: Resources, Production and Demand
    A Joint Report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency Uranium 2001: Resources, Production and Demand NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: − to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; − to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and − to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The following countries became Members subsequently through accession at the dates indicated hereafter: Japan (28th April 1964), Finland (28th January 1969), Australia (7th June 1971), New Zealand (29th May 1973), Mexico (18th May 1994), the Czech Republic (21st December 1995), Hungary (7th May 1996), Poland (22nd November 1996), Korea (12th December 1996) and the Slovak Republic (14 December 2000). The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD (Article 13 of the OECD Convention).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources-Reconnaissance Series Report 54
    STATE OF NEVADA ·DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Carson City / Photograph by Lawrence Radiation Laboratory· Sedan Crater was formed in the dry a ll uv ium of Yucca Flat by on underground atomic detonation. WATER RESOURCES-RECONNAISSANCE SERIES REPORT 54 REGIONAL GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS IN THE NEVADA TEST SITE AREA, NYE, LINCOLN, AND CLARK COUNTIES, NEVADA By F. Eugene Rush Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, U.S. Department of the Interior 1970 WATER RESOURCES - RECONNAISSANCE: SEJUES REPORT 54 ·. REGIONAL GROUND-WATER SYSTEMS·IN THE NEVADA TEST SITE AREA, NYE, LINCOLN, AND CLARK COUN'riE:S, NEVADA By F. Eugene Rush PreparBd cooperatively by the Geological Survey, u.s. Department of the Interior 1971 -\ FOREWORD The progr~m of reconnaissance water-resources studies was authorized by the 1960 Legislature to be carried on by Division of Water Resources of the Departc.ment of· Conservation and Natural Resources in cooperation with the u.s. Geological Survey. This report is the 54th in the series to be prepared by the staff of the Nevada District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey. These 54 reports describe the hydrology of 185 valleys. The reconnaissance surveys make available pertinent information of great and immediate value to many State and Federal agencies, the State cooperating agency, and the public. As development takes place in any area, ,]c,,mands for more detailed information will arise, and studies to supply such information will be undertaken. In the meantime, these reconnaissance studies are timely and adequately In<'eet tlle immediate needs for information on the wate.r resources of the areas covered by the reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Ar Iz Onautah California Cal If Orn Ia Oregon Idaho
    DESIGNATED GROUNDWATER BASINS OF NEVADA £ * # £ 47N £ £ J OREGON IDAHO k a 11 e Jackpot r 18E 19E 10 24E 25E e b 20E 21E 5 McDermitt r 47N Denio £ 22E 26E 28E i 23E C 27E d E E Owyhee g e 2 2 68E 69E 70E / / 1 66E 67E 1 55E 6 1 47N 63E 64E 65E 4 46N 3 44E 46E 49E 50E 51E 52E 53E 57E 59E 60E 61E 62E 45E 47E 48E 5 2 54E 47N 56E 58E 30E 31E 32E 33E s 140 34E 35E 38E 41E B l 36E 37E 39E l 13 U 40E 42E 43E ru C V a K n a r e n F i R 46N n e a y g 39 o v u Mountain i n s i v 41 R 12 R e iv r Jarbidge Peak City e * 45N 2 *Capitol Peak 34 46N r 46N * Matterhorn C O re w ek 45N No y Copper Mtn. rth h n Fo e * o R rk e 33B 37 lm i L R a 44N v it 45N S 30A e t iv 4 140 r le e VU r 7 45N H u m Sun C 44N n bo 38 reek n ld 0 i t 40 u 68 9 Q Granite Peak 35 Wildhorse 44N 1 43N 33A * 8 3 29 Reservoir 9 44N 43N Vya U M a r 42N 43N ys Orovada* Santa Rosa Peak 30B 43N T 42N 27 *McAfee Peak 14 67 41N *Jacks Peak 42N A R S N 42N out h i F o v 41N e o r r r k t h 189B 189C L i 189A H t t l 40N Chimney e 41N 15 F 41N H Reservoir o u r r 25 e m k Tecoma v 42 40N i b 44 R o l d Humboldt t 36 R 40N i 39N 69 v r e 40N r e 93 v H U M B O L D T i £ 26 ¤ 189D 39N R t Montello ld 63 o b 39N 32 m R 38N 39N u E Li K O v 233 H e VU r 38N e 225 n l t VU in t u i Q ¤£95 L 31 38N 38N 66 Cobre 37N 16 37N Wells Ma 28 gg 80 ie ¨¦§ 37N Pilot Peak* A 37N Oasis 36N 36N C I r R e 93 e o ¤£ k c k 36N * Hole in the 36N Mtn.
    [Show full text]
  • DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL TRANSACTIONS VOLUME 8 A
    DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL TRANSACTIONS VOLUME 8 a Desert Bighorn Council A COMPILATION OF FORMAL PAPERS PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL AT THE EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING, APRIL 7, 8, AND 9, 1964, IN MEXICO AT THE AUDITORIO DE SOCIAL SEGURIDO IN MEXICALI AND AT THE HOTEL VILLA DEL MAR AT PUERTO SAN FELIPE, BAJA CALIFORNIA. THE DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL TRANSACTIONS ARE PUBLISHED ANNUALLY AND ARE AVAILABLE BY WRITING THE . "DESERT BIGHORN COUNCIL" P. 0. BOX 440, LAS VEGAS, NEVADA. COVER DRAWING. BY PAT HANSEN. EIGHTH ANNUAL MEETING DESERT BHGI3ORN COUNCIL April 7, 8, 9, 1964 Mexicali and Puerto San Felipe, Baia California TABLE OF CONTEWS Page .. - program ........................................................ 111 Group Picture ................................................... vii Opening Remarks Dr. Rodolfo Hernandez Corzo, Chairman ............................. xv John P. Russo, Vice-Chairman ................................... x.ix . pp-ppp- . ........................................- -- ... -- --- - .- FORMAL PAPERS AND DISCUSSIONS DESERT BIGHORN SHEEP AT THE SAN DIEGO ZOOLOGICAL GARDEN George H. Pournelle, Curator of hlammals ............................ 1 .~DIXTIOSALNOTES ON PARASITES OF BIGHORN SHEEP ON THE DESERT GAME RANGE, NEVADA Rex W. Allen .............................................. 5 1-OXG-DISTASCE AND NIGHTTLME MOVEMENTS OF DESERT BIGHORh' SHEEP Gale hlonson ............................................... 11 IIESERT BIGHORN MAVAGEMENT NEEDS FROM THE ACADEhllC . porn?; OF VIEW U'ilIiamGraf ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamental Concepts of Recharge in the Desert Southwest: A
    Water Sci. and Appl. Groundwater Recharge in a Desert Environment: The Southwestern United States Vol. 9 FundamentalConcepts of Rechargein the Desert Southwest: A RegionalModeling Perspective Alan L. Flint, LorraineE. Flint, and JosephA. Hevesi U.S. GeologicalSurvey, Sacramento, California JoanB. Blainey U.S. GeologicalSurvey, Tucson, Arizona Rechargein arid basinsdoes not occur in all years or at all locationswithin a basin.In the desertSouthwest potential evapotranspiration exceeds precipitation on an averageannual basis and, in many basins,on an averagemonthly basis. Groundwatertravel time from the surfaceto the water table and rechargeto the water table vary temporallyand spatiallyowing to variationsin precipitation,air temperature,root zone and soil propertiesand thickness,faults and fractures,and hydrologicproperties of geologicstrata in the unsaturatedzone. To highlightthe fundamentalconcepts controlling recharge in the Southwest,and addressthe tem- poral and spatial variability of recharge, a basin characterizationmodel was developedusing a straightforwardwater balanceapproach to estimatepotential rechargeand runoff and allow for determinationof the locationof rechargewith- in a basin.It providesa meansfor interbasincomparison of the mechanismsand processesthat result in rechargeand calculatesthe potential for rechargeunder current,wetter, and drier climates.Model estimatesof rechargecompare favor- ably with othermethods estimating recharge in the Great Basin. Resultsindicate that net infiltration occursin less than 5 percentof
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Hydrographic Areas and Sub-Areas/Listed Alphabetically by Primary County of Location Basin Area Area Area Num
    Appendix A-4--Nevada Hydrographic Areas and Sub-Areas/Listed Alphabetically by Primary County of Location Basin Area Area Area Num. Num. (sq.mi.) (acres) Desig Hydrograph Area/Sub-Area Counties [1] [2] [3] [4] Nearest Cities [6] Name Included [5] Carson City, 8 104 69 44,160 Eagle Valley Carson City Yes Douglas Frenchman, 10 125 43 27,520 Stingaree Valley Churchill Yes Eastgate 5 77 58 37,120 Fireball Valley Churchill Nixon, Fernley No Frenchman, 10 126 110 70,400 Cowkick Valley Churchill Yes Eastgate 10 133 416 266,240 Edwards Creek Valley Churchill Eastgate, Austin No 10 127 216 138,240 Eastgate Valley Area Churchill Eastgate Yes Bradys Hot Springs, 5 75 178 113,920 Brady Hot Springs Area Churchill, Lyon Yes Fernley Churchill, Frenchman, Fallon, 10 124 285 182,400 Fairview Valley Yes Mineral Eastgate Churchill, 10 123 227 145,280 Rawhide Flats Schurz, Fallon No Mineral, Lyon Churchill, 4 74 164 104,960 White Plains Lovelock, Fernley Yes Pershing Churchill, 10 128 1,303 833,920 Dixie Valley Dixie Valley, Fallon Yes Pershing, Lander Churchill, 8 101 2,022 1,294,080 Carson Desert Fallon, Stillwater Yes Pershing, Lyon North Las Vegas, 13 217 80 51,200 Hidden Valley Clark No Moapa Boulder City, 10 167 530 339,200 Eldorado Valley Clark Yes Searchlight Las Vegas, 13 212 1,564 1,000,960 Las Vegas Valley Clark Yes Henderson 13 223 533 341,120 Gold Butte Area Clark Overton, Logandale No 10 165 96 61,440 Jean Lake Valley Clark Jean, Goodsprings Yes Three Lakes Valley-Southern 13 211 311 199,040 Clark Indian Springs Yes Part Bunkerville, 13 224
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography on the Conservation of Biological Diversity: Biological
    Bibliography on the Conservation of Biological Diversity: $4 Biological/Ecological, Economic, and Policy Issues 0, Stephen Polasky, Associate Professor Steve Pavich, M.S. Student Michael Jaspin, M.S . Student Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Oregon State University, 213 Ballard Extension Hall, Corvallis, OR 9733 1-3601 Nmcy Bergeron, Ph.D. Student Department of ~griculturaland Resource Economics, University of Maryland Dedicated to the memory of our friend and colleague Susanne Szentandrasi. October 3 1, 1994 Comments, additions, and corrections welcomed (Please direct to Stephen Polasky or Steve Pavich at Oregon State University Phone: (541) 737-1406; e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]) Prepared in part for and with support from the Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Project 143 and the Environment, Mhstructure, and Agriculture Division, Policy I Research Department, World Bank, RPO ##679-40. General Biodiversity Conservation . General B~odversityConservation .......................................... :................................... 1 . * Marine and Freshwater Biodversity ........................................................................... Area Case Studies...................................................................................................... Environmental Ethics................................................................................................. Patterns and History of Extmct~ons...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    B L M U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment Mojave Desert Burned Area Restoration of Desert Tortoise Habitat DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2016-0029-EA PREPARING OFFICE U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management 4701 N. Torrey Pines Dr. Las Vegas, Nevada 89130 702–515–5000 Environmental Assessment Mojave Desert Burned Area Restoration of Desert Tortoise Habitat DOI-BLM-NV-S010-2016-0029-EA This page intentionally left blank Environmental Assessment iii Table of Contents _1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 _1.1. Identifying Information ................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1. Title, EA Number, and Type of Project ................................................................. 1 1.1.2. Location of Proposed Action ................................................................................. 1 1.1.3. Preparing Office and Lead Agency ........................................................................ 1 _1.2. Purpose and Need for Action .......................................................................................... 1 _1.3. Background ..................................................................................................................... 2 _1.4. Scoping, Public Involvement and Issues ........................................................................ 6 _2. Proposed Action and Alternatives
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3 Water Resources and Use Assessment
    Nevada Division of Water Planning Nevada State Water Plan SUMMARY Section 3 Water Resources and Use Assessment Introduction An understanding of the state’s water resources and its usage is a necessary component to the planning and management process. This section provides an overview of the physical characteristics of Nevada’s water resources and historic water use for the last 25 years. Water Resources Background The following discussion provides an overview of Nevada’s surface water and groundwater resources. Topography The topography of Nevada and the surrounding areas makes for a unique and diversified climate. Nearly all of Nevada is in the Basin and Range Province of the Intermountain Plateaus, a rugged elevated area between the Rocky Mountains and the Pacific mountain system. The topography of the Basin and Range province is characterized by isolated, long and narrow, roughly north-south trending, parallel mountain ranges and broad, intervening valleys. Internal drainage is a significant feature of the hydrology of much of Nevada with about 84 percent of the drainage flowing to low areas in enclosed basins rather than to the sea. The topography and related geology of the State has resulted in complex surface and ground water systems, complicating the management of these resources. In the 1960s, the Nevada State Engineer’s Office and the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recognized the need for a systematic identification of the valleys or hydrographic areas, and developed a hydrographic area map. The current hydrographic area map delineates 256 hydrographic areas within 14 major hydrographic regions and basins (Figure 3-1, Table 3-1).
    [Show full text]
  • Monsoon Passage Fact Sheet
    Monsoon Passage Fact Sheet Safe haven stepping stones from the Mojave Desert to the Northern Great Basin East Pass a few years after a fire in the Clover Mountains of the southern Great Basin looking down into the Mojave’s Tule Desert © Louis Provencher/TNC Monsoon Passage The connected mountain ranges and wet valley bottoms of this natural highway provide desert tortoises, bighorn sheep, Cooper’s hawk, mule deer and other species escape routes from growing climate impacts, allowing them to find new homes where they can thrive. The region's name comes from being at the western edge of the summer monsoons that provide needed eastern-facing moisture to buffer rising temperatures and a pathway for species moving north. Imagine populations of raptors, small carnivores, small mammals, mule deer, bighorn sheep, passerine birds, insects, and plant species pushed northward or up and around mountains by warming temperatures and changes in precipitation patterns. Non-migratory species flow from the hot Mojave Desert ecoregion to the cooler Columbia Plateau ecoregion passing through the entirety of the Great Basin ecoregion is not easily guaranteed. There are less than five corridors of passably connected mountains ranges and wet valley bottoms that fully allow species movement within a viable thermal environment that may be viewed as steppingstones of safe havens. The Nevada Chapter is proposing one such thermal corridor in eastern Nevada titled Monsoon Passage. The corridor follows the Nevada-Utah border and is mostly in Nevada. For those familiar
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif
    In Cooperation with the National Park Service Geophysical studies based on gravity and seismic data of Tule Desert, Meadow Valley Wash, and California Wash basins, southern Nevada By Daniel S. Scheirer, William R. Page, and John J. Miller Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government Open-File Report 2006-1396 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Contents Abstract .........................................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction and Geologic Setting.................................................................................................................................1 Gravity Observations.....................................................................................................................................................3 Gravity Analysis............................................................................................................................................................4 Rock Samples ................................................................................................................................................................6 Seismic Reflection Lines ...............................................................................................................................................6 Results ...........................................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]