DOCSLIB.ORG

Bakalářská Práce

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bakalářská Práce Univerzita Karlova v Praze Přírodovědecká fakulta Studijní program: Biologie Studijní obor: Biologie Bakalářská práce Mechanismy a efektivita antipredační obrany v rámci černo-červeného mimetického komplexu Mechanisms and effectiveness of antipredatory defences within black-and- red mimetic complex Lucie Kotlíková Vedoucí práce: doc. Mgr. Alice Exnerová, Ph.D. Konzultant: RNDr. Jan Raška, Ph.D. Konzultant: Mgr. Kateřina Hotová-Svádová, Ph.D. Praha, 2021 Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem závěrečnou práci zpracovala samostatně a že jsem uvedla všechny použité informační zdroje a literaturu. Tato práce ani její podstatná část nebyla předložena k získání jiného nebo stejného akademického titulu. V Praze dne Lucie Kotlíková …..…………………….. Poděkování Děkuji své školitelce doc. Mgr. Alice Exnerové, Ph.D. za odborné konzultace a trpělivost při psaní této práce. Dále bych chtěla poděkovat RNDr. Janu Raškovi, Ph.D. a Mgr. Kateřině Hotové Svádové, Ph.D. za pomoc a cenné rady při zpracování této práce. Dále bych ráda poděkovala své rodině a partnerovi za velkou podporu během studia. Abstrakt: Nápadně zbarvené druhy mohou vytvářet mimetické komplexy. Jedním z nich je rozsáhlý černo- červený mimetický komplex v palearktické oblasti. Tvoří ho zástupci napříč taxony členovců s různou úrovní obrany a investicí do ní. K popsání jednotlivých mimetických vztahů v tomto komplexu je třeba poznat efektivitu těchto obranných mechanismů vůči predátorům. Reakce jednotlivých predátorů se značně liší. Odlišnost reakcí primárně závisí na schopnosti vnímat prostředky obrany, pomocí smyslových a kognitivních schopností. Mechanismy a efektivita antipredační obrany jsou předmětem řady studií, avšak stále chybí popis některých mechanismů u řady zástupců tohoto mimetického komplexu. Z tohoto důvodu jsou potřeba další studie, umožňující v budoucnosti vyvození mimetických vztahů panujících v tomto mimetickém komplexu. Klíčová slova: mimikry, aposematismus, antipredační obrana, zbarvení, mimetický komplex Abstract: Strikingly coloured species can form mimetic complexes. One of them is an extensive black-and- red mimetic complex in the Palearctic region. It consists of representatives across arthropod taxa with different levels of defense and investment in it. To describe individual mimetic relationships in this complex, it is necessary to know the effectiveness of these defense mechanisms against predators. Reactions of individual predators vary considerably. Differences in reactions primarily depend on the ability to perceive some components of defense, using sensory and cognitive abilities. Mechanisms and effectiveness of antipredatory defence are the subject of numerous studies, but there is still a lack of description of some mechanisms among many representatives forming this mimetic complex. For this reason, further studies are needed to allow the derivation of mimetic relationships prevailing in this mimetic complex in the future. Keywords: mimicry, aposematism, antipredatory defense, colouration, mimetic complex Obsah 1. Úvod ................................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Antipredační zbarvení a související prostředky obrany .................................................................. 2 3. Mimetické spektrum ........................................................................................................................ 3 4. Vymezení červenočerného komplexu ............................................................................................. 4 5. Antipredační obrana ........................................................................................................................ 4 5.1. Hemiptera: Heteroptera ........................................................................................................... 4 5.1.1. Lygaeidae ........................................................................................................................ 4 5.1.1.1. Lygaeus equestris ........................................................................................................ 5 5.1.1.2. Spilostethus spp. .......................................................................................................... 6 5.1.2. Pyrrhocoridae .................................................................................................................. 6 5.1.2.1. Pyrrhocoris apterus ..................................................................................................... 6 5.1.2.2. Scantius aegyptius ....................................................................................................... 7 5.1.3. Reduviidae ....................................................................................................................... 8 5.1.4. Pentatomidae ................................................................................................................... 8 5.1.4.1. Graphosoma italicum, Graphosoma lineatum ............................................................ 9 5.1.5. Další zástupci Heteroptera ............................................................................................. 10 5.2. Hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha ............................................................................................... 11 5.2.1. Cercopidae ..................................................................................................................... 11 5.3. Coleoptera ............................................................................................................................. 11 5.3.1. Coccinelidae .................................................................................................................. 11 5.3.1.1. Harmonia axyridis ..................................................................................................... 12 5.3.1.2. Hippodamia convergens ............................................................................................ 13 5.3.1.3. Coccinella septempunctata ........................................................................................ 13 5.3.1.4. Adalia bipunctata ...................................................................................................... 14 5.3.1.5. Další zástupci Coccinelidae ....................................................................................... 14 5.3.2. Chrysomelidae ............................................................................................................... 15 5.3.2.1. Chrysomela lapponica ............................................................................................... 15 5.3.2.2. Chrysomela populi .................................................................................................... 16 5.3.2.3. Gonioctena viminalis ................................................................................................. 16 5.3.2.4. Další významné podčeledi Chrysomelidae................................................................ 17 5.3.3. Staphylinidae ................................................................................................................. 17 5.3.4. Cleridae ......................................................................................................................... 19 5.3.5. Silphidae ........................................................................................................................ 19 5.3.6. Další významné čeledi Coleoptera ................................................................................ 20 5.4. Lepidoptera ............................................................................................................................ 21 5.4.1. Zygaenidae .................................................................................................................... 21 5.4.2. Arctiidae ........................................................................................................................ 22 5.5. Araneae .................................................................................................................................. 23 5.5.1. Eresidae ......................................................................................................................... 23 5.5.2. Salticidae -Philaeus chrysops ........................................................................................ 24 5.5.3. Thomisidae – Synema globosum ................................................................................... 24 6. Efektivita obranných mechanismů ................................................................................................ 24 6.1. Pokusy testující efektivitu s ptačími predátory ..................................................................... 24 6.2. Pokusy testující efektivitu s dalšími obratlovčími predátory ................................................ 27 6.3. Pokusy testující efektivitu s predátory z kmene členovců ..................................................... 28 7. Závěr.............................................................................................................................................. 30 8. Literární zdroje .............................................................................................................................. 31 1. Úvod V důsledku časté interakce mezi kořistí a predátorem došlo k evoluci antipredačních mechanismů. Vytváření a udržování jednotlivých složek obrany může být pro jedince energeticky velice náročné. V mnohých situacích mu to ale
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Effects of Sexual Dimorphism on Toxic Prey Avoidance in the Chinese Praying Mantis, Tenodera Sinensis
    MUShare Undergraduate Research Symposium (URS) College of Arts and Sciences 12-5-2018 The Effects of Sexual Dimorphism on Toxic Prey Avoidance in the Chinese Praying Mantis, Tenodera sinensis Sophie Podgorski [email protected] Emma Swartz [email protected] Tisa Steinmeyer [email protected] Kayla I. Miller Ph.D. [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://mushare.marian.edu/urs Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Podgorski, Sophie; Swartz, Emma; Steinmeyer, Tisa; and Miller, Kayla I. Ph.D., "The Effects of Sexual Dimorphism on Toxic Prey Avoidance in the Chinese Praying Mantis, Tenodera sinensis" (2018). Undergraduate Research Symposium (URS). 4. https://mushare.marian.edu/urs/4 This Poster is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts and Sciences at MUShare. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Research Symposium (URS) by an authorized administrator of MUShare. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Effects of Sexual Dimorphism on Toxic Prey Avoidance in the Chinese Praying Mantis, Tenodera sinensis Sophie Podgorski, Emma Swartz, Tisa Steinmeyer, and Kayla I. Miller, PhD College of Arts and Sciences, Marian University Indianapolis 3200 Cold Spring Rd, Indianapolis, IN 46222 INTRODUCTION 0 MM AND 50 MM CONCENTRATION • This experiment strives to investigate if sex based behaviors in Figure 1. Figure 2. praying mantid feeding habits hold true when sexual Ethogram Ethogram dimorphism is not obvious in juvenile mantids showing the showing the • Sensitivity to bitter tastes provides an important means for activity activity happening happening animals to detect various toxic compounds in food (Wooding et during the during the al.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of the Search Image on the Lizard Ability to Reveal a Batesian Mimic
    University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice Faculty of Science Effect of the search image on the lizard ability to reveal a Batesian mimic Master thesis Bc. Josef Beneš Školitel: RNDr. Petr Veselý, Ph.D. České Budějovice 2016 Master thesis: Beneš, J. (2015). Effect of the search image on the lizard ability to reveal a Batesian mimic. Mgr. Thesis, in English with Czech introduction. – 58 pp., Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Czech Republic. Annotation: The effect of the search image on the ability of hand reared skinks (Chalcides sexlineatus) to reveal a “fake” Batesian mimic was tested with respect to their previous experience with palatable experimental prey (Guyana spotted cockroach – Blaptica dubia) which served as a motivational prey as well as midsized mealworm beetle larvae (Tenebrio molitor). The red firebug (Pyrrhocoris apterus) was used as an aposematic model. Prohlašuji, že svoji diplomovou práci jsem vypracoval samostatně pouze s použitím pramenů a literatury uvedených v seznamu citované literatury. Prohlašuji, že v souladu s § 47b zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. v platném znění souhlasím se zveřejněním své diplomové práce, a to v nezkrácené podobě elektronickou cestou ve veřejně přístupné části databáze STAG provozované Jihočeskou univerzitou v Českých Budějovicích na jejích internetových stránkách, a to se zachováním mého autorského práva k odevzdanému textu této kvalifikační práce. Souhlasím dále s tím, aby toutéž elektronickou cestou byly v souladu s uvedeným ustanovením zákona č. 111/1998 Sb. zveřejněny posudky školitele a oponentů práce i záznam o průběhu a výsledku obhajoby kvalifikační práce. Rovněž souhlasím s porovnáním textu mé kvalifikační práce s databází kvalifikačních prací Theses.cz provozovanou Národním registrem vysokoškolských kvalifikačních prací a systémem na odhalování plagiátů.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantodea (Insecta), with a Review of Aspects of Functional Morphology and Biology
    aua o ew eaa Ramsay, G. W. 1990: Mantodea (Insecta), with a review of aspects of functional morphology and biology. Fauna of New Zealand 19, 96 pp. Editorial Advisory Group (aoimes mae o a oaioa asis MEMBERS AT DSIR PLANT PROTECTION Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa Ex officio ieco — M ogwo eae Sysemaics Gou — M S ugae Co-opted from within Systematics Group Dr B. A ooway Κ Cosy UIESIIES EESEAIE R. M. Emeso Eomoogy eame ico Uiesiy Caeuy ew eaa MUSEUMS EESEAIE M R. L. ama aua isoy Ui aioa Museum o iae ag Weigo ew eaa OESEAS REPRESENTATIVE J. F. awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy GO o 1700, Caea Ciy AC 2601, Ausaia Series Editor M C ua Sysemaics Gou SI a oecio Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa aua o ew eaa Number 19 Maoea (Iseca wi a eiew o asecs o ucioa mooogy a ioogy G W Ramsay SI a oecio M Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa emoa us wig mooogy eosigma cooaio siuaio acousic sesiiiy eece eaiou egeeaio eaio aasiism aoogy a ie Caaoguig-i-uicaio ciaio AMSAY GW Maoea (Iseca – Weigo SI uisig 199 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533 ; o 19 IS -77-51-1 I ie II Seies UC 59575(931 Date of publication: see cover of subsequent numbers Suggese om o ciaio amsay GW 199 Maoea (Iseca wi a eiew o asecs o ucioa mooogy a ioogy Fauna of New Zealand [no.] 19. —— Fauna o New Zealand is eae o uicaio y e Seies Eio usig comue- ase e ocessig ayou a ase ie ecoogy e Eioia Aisoy Gou a e Seies Eio ackowege e oowig co-oeaio SI UISIG awco – sueisio o oucio a isiuio M C Maews – assisace wi oucio a makeig Ms A Wig – assisace wi uiciy a isiuio MOU AE ESEAC CEE SI Miss M oy
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrrhocoris Apterus (Linnaeus, 1758) - a New Record of Firebug (Hemiptera, Pyrrhocoridae) from Malta
    Correspondence BULL. ENT. SOC. MALTA (2019) Vol. 10 : 106–107 DOI: 10.17387/BULLENTSOCMALTA.2019.12 Pyrrhocoris apterus (Linnaeus, 1758) - a new record of firebug (Hemiptera, Pyrrhocoridae) from Malta Thomas CASSAR1 True bugs of the family Pyrrhocoridae, more commonly known as red bugs, cotton stainers or (in the case of Pyrrhocoris apterus) firebugs, are represented by 43 species from 13 genera in the Palaearctic (AUKEMA & RIEGER, 2001). The Heteroptera of the Maltese Islands have been relatively well-studied, with 141 species recorded (CUESTA SEGURA et al., 2010; CARAPEZZA & MIFSUD, 2015; 2016). Of these, only one species belongs to the family Pyrrhocoridae - Scantius aegyptius aegyptius. However, specimens collected in summer of 2018 were confirmed to bePyrrhocoris apterus, a new Pyrrhocorid record for Malta. Pyrrhocoris apterus (Linnaeus, 1758) Material examined: Malta, Ħaż-Żebbuġ, 20.vi.2018, leg. T. Cassar (1 macropterous); Rabat, Chadwick Lakes, 16.ix.2018, leg. T. Cassar (1 brachypterous); Rabat, Chadwick Lakes, 19.ix.2018, leg. T. Cassar (1 brachypterous). Notes: Pyrrhocoris apterus has a predominantly Palaearctic distribution, being present from the Iberian Peninsula eastwards into Siberia and China, including most of central and southern Europe. In controlled conditions, eggs take seven and a half days to hatch (MATOLÍN, 1973). P. apterus goes through five larval instars, the last of which lasts the longest – typically about seven days R( IZKI & SLÁMA, 1968). Adults can be either brachypterous or macropterous, though various intermediate morphs exist. Brachypters’ wings are reduced to vestigial scales whilst macropterous individuals have well-developed pairs of wings which extend to the abdomen tip or past it (SEIDENSTÜCKER, 1953).
    [Show full text]
  • Cryptic Female Mantids Signal Quality Through Brightness
    Functional Ecology 2015, 29, 531–539 doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.12363 Sexual signals for the colour-blind: cryptic female mantids signal quality through brightness Katherine L. Barry*, Thomas E. White, Darshana N. Rathnayake, Scott A. Fabricant and Marie E. Herberstein Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Summary 1. Cryptic coloration may evolve in response to selective pressure imposed by predators, yet effective intraspecific communication may require some level of detectability. This creates a tension between the benefits of sexually selected visual traits and the predatory costs imposed by greater conspicuousness, and little is known about how this tension may be ameliorated in highly cryptic species. 2. We explore these competing demands in the false garden mantid Pseudomantis albofimbriata, a colour-blind and seemingly cryptic insect. We use reflectance spectrometry and receptor-noise modelling to characterize the conspicuousness of mantid body regions in the visual systems of mates (mantids), as well as potential predators (birds) and prey (bees). We then use condition manipulation and conspecific choice tests to further explore the colour traits of interest. 3. Based on visual modelling, we find that male mantids are inconspicuous to conspecifics, prey and predators – that is, they are chromatically and achromatically cryptic. In contrast, female mantids are chromatically cryptic to all potential receivers, but their abdomens are achromatically conspicuous. Our food manipulation experiment shows that females in good condition (and therefore with more eggs) have brighter abdomens than females in poor condition. Choice assays show male mantids are consistently attracted to females bearing brighter abdomens. 4. Our results reveal brightness-mediated sexual signalling in a colour-blind and classically cryptic insect.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) Hanan H
    Vol 20, No. 5;May 2013 Some Biological Parameters and Morphological Descriptions Study on the Milkweed Bug, Spilostethus Pandurus Scop., (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) Hanan H. Awad*, Heba A. S. Elelimy, Aziza H. Omar and Afaf A. Meguid Entomology Dep., Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Egypt * Corresponding author. Tel.: +20 1005690494; fax: +20 235728843. E-mail address: [email protected] Abstract The milkweed bug, Spilostethus pandurus, is an agricultural pest in Egypt and some other tropical and subtropical areas. The objective of the present work is to clarify some biological parameters and morphological descriptions to emphasize the future researches from the ecological view point to the physiological study, biochemical study and control programs, integrated pest management program, study. Adult emergence of S. pandurus in summer season was higher than that in winter season. The increased longevity of S. pandurus was associated with prolonged rate of sexual maturation and low mean daily fecundity and that the life span increased during the cold months of the year and decreased during the hot summer and the males lived longer than females. The morphological descriptions of the adult and immature stages of S. pandurus were agreed with the taxonomic illustrations. Key words: Milkweed bug; Biology; development; morphology. Introduction The milkweed bug Spilostethus pandurus, occurs throughout Egypt all the year round (Priesner and Alfieri, 1953). The Hemipteran bugs have long been established in Egypt as one of the serious pests infesting the seeds of great number of plants (Schaefer and Panizzi, 2000; Meguid et al., 2013). The milkweed bug S. pandurus is widely distributed in tropical and subtropical areas where at times it causes serious damage (Kugelberg, 1973a).Their economic importance has been steadily increased in recent years, and the annual losses due to their ravages against vegetables and other crops are sometimes great and immeasurable.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Distance Discrimination Between Stationary Targets in Praying Mantis: an Index of the Use of Motion Parallax
    The Journal of Experimental Biology 198, 2127–2137 (1995) 2127 Printed in Great Britain © The Company of Biologists Limited 1995 VISUAL DISTANCE DISCRIMINATION BETWEEN STATIONARY TARGETS IN PRAYING MANTIS: AN INDEX OF THE USE OF MOTION PARALLAX MICHAEL POTESER AND KARL KRAL* Institut für Zoologie, Karl-Franzens-Universität, Universitätsplatz 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria Accepted 7 June 1995 Summary 1. When larvae of the praying mantis Polyspilota sp. and It is supposed that the distance measurement involves the Tenodera sinensis want to leave an exposed position and larger and faster retinal image shifts that near, as opposed can choose to move between stationary objects at different to more distant, objects evoke. distances, they usually choose the nearest. Their ability to 4. Mantid larvae can distinguish a black-and-white select the nearest object is greatest when the background rectangle in the foreground from a black-and-white striped has horizontal stripes and is least when it has vertical background, even when both are similar with respect to stripes. Object preference is based on a successive distance luminance, contrast and texture. The ability to distinguish comparison, which may involve content-related memory between figures and background could be explained by processes. motion parallaxes, i.e. by the fact that during peering 2. Mantid larvae can determine the absolute distance to movements the nearer object moves faster and by a larger a stationary object. Vertical contrasting borders play an angle than the background structure. important role in this process. 5. From birth onwards, even when the eyes have yet to 3. Side-to-side head movements (peering) are directly develop foveal specialization, mantids are capable of this involved in the distance measurement, as shown (i) by the visually controlled behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Cletus Trigonus
    BIOSYSTEMATICS OF THE TRUE BUGS (HETEROPTERA) OF DISTRICT SWAT PAKISTAN SANA ULLAH DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY HAZARA UNIVERSITY MANSEHRA 2018 HAZARA UNIVERSITY MANSEHRA DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY BIOSYSTEMATICS OF THE TRUE BUGS (HETEROPTERA) OF DISTRICT SWAT PAKISTAN By SANA ULLAH 34894 13-PhD-Zol-F-HU-1 This research study has been conducted and reported as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philisophy in Zoology awarded by Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan Mansehra, The Friday 22, February 2019 BIOSYSTEMATICS OF THE TRUE BUGS (HETEROPTERA) OF DISTRICT SWAT PAKISTAN Submitted by Sana Ullah Ph.D Scholar Research Supervisor Prof. Dr. Habib Ahmad Department of Genetics Hazara University, Mansehra Co-Supervisor Prof. Dr. Muhammad Ather Rafi Principal Scientific Officer, National Agricultural Research Center, Islamabad DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY HAZARA UNIVERSITY MANSEHRA 2018 Dedication Dedicated to my Parents and Siblings ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS All praises are due to Almighty Allah, the most Powerful Who is the Lord of every creature of the universe and all the tributes to the Holy prophet Hazrat Muhammad (SAW) who had spread the light of learning in the world. I wish to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to my supervisor Prof. Dr. Habib Ahmad (TI), Vice Chancellor, Islamia College University, Peshawar, for his enormous support, inspiring guidance from time to time with utmost patience and providing the necessary facilities to carry out this work. He is a source of great motivation and encouragement for me. I respect him from the core of my heart due to his integrity, attitude towards students, and eagerness towards research. I am equally grateful to my Co Supervisor Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • News on True Bugs of Serra De Collserola Natural Park (Ne Iberian Peninsula) and Their Potential Use in Environmental Education (Insecta, Heteroptera)
    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 52 (30/6/2013): 244–248. NEWS ON TRUE BUGS OF SERRA DE COLLSEROLA NATURAL PARK (NE IBERIAN PENINSULA) AND THEIR POTENTIAL USE IN ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION (INSECTA, HETEROPTERA) Víctor Osorio1, Marcos Roca-Cusachs2 & Marta Goula3 1 Mestre Lluís Millet, 92, Bxos., 3a; 08830 Sant Boi de Llobregat; Barcelona, Spain – [email protected] 2 Plaça Emili Mira i López, 3, Bxos.; 08022 Barcelona, Spain – [email protected] 3 Departament de Biologia Animal and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Facultat de Biologia, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Avda. Diagonal 645, 08028 Barcelona, Spain – [email protected] Abstract: A checklist of 43 Heteropteran species collected in the area of influence of Can Coll School of Nature is given. By its rarity in the Catalan fauna, the mirid Deraeocoris (D.) schach (Fabricius, 1781) and the pentatomid Sciocoris (N.) maculatus Fieber, 1851 are interesting species. Plus being rare species, the mirid Macrotylus (A.) solitarius (Meyer-Dür, 1843) and the pentatomid Sciocoris (S.) umbrinus (Wolff, 1804) are new records for the Natural Park. The mirids Alloetomus germanicus Wagner, 1939 and Amblytylus brevicollis Fieber, 1858, and the pentatomid Eysarcoris aeneus (Scopoli, 1763) are new contributions for the Park checklist. The Heteropteran richness of Can Coll suggests them as study group for the environmental education goals of this School of Nature. Key words: Heteroptera, faunistics, new records, environmental education, Serra de Collserola, Catalonia, Iberian Peninsula. Nuevos datos sobre chinches del Parque Natural de la Serra de Collserola (noreste de la península Ibérica) y su uso potencial en educación ambiental (Insecta, Heteroptera) Resumen: Se presenta un listado de 43 especies de heterópteros recolectados dentro del área de influencia de la Escuela de Naturaleza de Can Coll.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Heteroptera of the Canary Islands (Insecta)1
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at A Checklist of the Heteroptera of the Canary Islands (Insecta)1 B. AUKEMA, J.P. DUFFELS & M. BÁEZ Abstract: New records of Heteroptera from the Canary Islands are listed and an updated checklist is presented. A new species of the genus Noualhieria (Lygaeidae) from El Hierro is described, 12 species are recorded from the archipelago for the first time, and 121 new island records are listed. Key words: Canary Islands, checklist, distribution, Heteroptera, Noualhieria heissi nov.sp. Introduction Tenerife by MOULET (1995) is erroneous (KERZHNER 2001). Dicranocephalus medius The first checklist of the Heteroptera of (MULSANT & REY 1870) was cited from the the Canary Islands was published by LIND- Canary Islands by MOULET (1995) and alre- BERG (1953) and supplemented by LINDBERG ady questioned by HEISS (1997). Stictopleu- (1960) and LINDBERG & WAGNER (1965). rus abutilon (ROSSI 1790) was cited from the The second list was compiled by HEISS & Canary Islands by GÖLLNER-SCHEIDING BÁEZ (1990), followed by five supplements: (1975), Odontotarsus intermedius HORVÁTH HEISS & RIBES (1992), HEISS & WOUDSTRA 1923 by GÖLLNER-SCHEIDING (1990). Lygus (1993), HEISS et al. (1996), RIBES & RIBES pratensis (LINNAEUS 1758) and Holcostethus (1997) and HEISS (1997). After the last sup- strictus vernalis (WOLFF 1804) [listed as Dry- plement 372 species were listed from the is- ocoris strictus (FABRICIUS 1803) by BÁEZ et lands. The next list (BÁEZ & ZURITA 2001) al. (2004)] were removed from the list by was included in a book on the biodiversity HEISS & RIBES (1992). Phytocoris (Compse- of the Canary Islands (IZQUIERDO et al. rocoris) sanctipetri CARAPEZZA 1985 is remo- 2001), followed by an update (BÁEZ et al.
    [Show full text]
  • China-1938-Hemiptera-From-Iraq-Iran
    ' l&R.AR...Y Of THE UN!Vf.R._SITY .• or ILLINOIS , . 590.~S = " FI v.~o ~~a.- <- ~ C Return this book on ~~e the Latest Date stamped below. A charge · is made on all overdue books. University of lllinoi1 Library M32 ZOOLOGICAL SERIES OF FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY Volume XX CHICAGO, AUGUST 30, 1938 No. 32 HEMIPTERA FROM IRAQ, IRAN, AND ARABIA BY W. E. CH1NA 1 During the Field Museum Anthropological Expedition to the Near East in 1934, the leader, Dr. Henry Field, and his collaborators obtained a large amount of zoological material. Later, more speci­ mens were acquired by Dr. Field's collector, Yusuf Lazar, in Iraq. From Mr. H. St. J. Philby, in Mecca, Arabia, Field Museum also received, as a much appreciated gift, various zoological specimens from Arabia. Among the insects obtained as indicated were some interesting Hemiptera, which I am recording at the request of the Director of Field Museum and by permission of the Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). A cicada, Melampsalta fraseri, from Iraq, and a genus and species of fulgorid, Philbyella arabica, from Arabia, proved to be new and are, therefore, described. Wherever possible, the spelfing of the locality names conforms to that adopted by the Permanent Committee on Geographical Names of the Royal Geographical Society, London. THE LIBRARY OF THE IIETEROPTERA CYDNIDAE SEP 2 - 1938 Macroscytus brunneus (Fabricius) . UNIVERSJlY OF llUNOJS Iraq: Baghdad, one specimen, June 8, 1936; Yusuf Lazar. Arabia: Mecca District, five specimens, December 22, 1932; January 3, 5, 20, 1933; April 1, 1933; H.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Lawrence E. Hurd Phone: (540) 458-8484 Department of Biology FAX: 540-458-8012 Washington & Lee University Email: [email protected] Lexington, Virginia 24450 USA Education: B.A., Hiram College, 1969 Ph.D., Syracuse University, 1972 Positions (in reverse chronological order): Herwick Professor of Biology, Washington & Lee University 2008-present; Pesquisador Visitante Especial, Universidade Federal do Amazonas (UFAM) 2013-2015. Editor- in-Chief,Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2007 – present. Research supported by John T. Herwick Endowment, Brazilian research fellowship from CAPES, and by Lenfest faculty research grants from Washington and Lee University. Head of Department of Biology, Washington and Lee University, 1993-2008. Editorial Board of Oecologia, 1997 - 2003. Professor of Biology, Program in Ecology, School of Life and Health Sciences, and member of Graduate Faculty, University of Delaware, 1973-1993. Joint appointments: (1) College of Marine Studies (1974-1984); (2) Department of Entomology and Applied Ecology, College of Agriculture (1985-1993). Research supported by grants from NSF, NOAA (Sea Grant), and UDRF (U. Del.). Postdoctoral Fellow, Cornell University, 1972 - 1973. Studies of population genetics and agro-ecosystems with D. Pimentel. Supported by grant from Ford Foundation to DP. Postdoctoral Fellow, Costa Rica, summer 1972. Behavioral ecology of tropical hummingbirds with L. L. Wolf. Supported by NSF grant to LLW. Memberships: American Association for the Advancement of Science Linnean Society
    [Show full text]