Reconstructing Prehistoric Social Organization: a Case Study from the Wansan Site, Neolithic Taiwan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reconstructing Prehistoric Social Organization: a Case Study from the Wansan Site, Neolithic Taiwan Reconstructing Prehistoric Social Organization: A Case Study From the Wansan Site, Neolithic Taiwan By Chih Hua Chiang A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge Professor Ruth Tringham, Chair Professor Rosemary Joyce Professor You-Tien Hsing Spring 2010 Abstract Reconstructing Prehistoric Social Organization: A Case Study From the Wansan Site, Neolithic Taiwan by Chih Hua Chiang Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology University of California, Berkeley Professor Ruth Tringham, Chair The purpose of this dissertation project is to identify characteristics of social organization among the Neolithic people in Taiwan. Specifically, this dissertation aims to examine the potential social differentiation at the inter-household level. Archaeological materials from the Wansan site (ca. 3,500-2,700 B.P.) are analyzed through examining the spatial distribution of house structures and archaeological artifacts. This dissertation explicitly utilized the House Society concept to examine how prehistoric Wansan people organized themselves and explore how and why there were differences among the houses. The House Society concept can offer archaeologists a framework to understand how the prehistoric people organized themselves, and assists us to interpret the differences of the quantity and quality of artifacts which might exist at the house/House level. In this dissertation, various archaeological implications derived from the House society concept were proposed and examined using the archaeological material excavated from the Wansan site in northeastern Taiwan. The results of this analysis illustrate that the residential houses in the Wansan society was not only a place where people resided and interacted with other members on a daily basis, but also where the lives of the living members intertwined with the ancestors through situating of deceased members around the residential houses. Furthermore, the correlation between the presence of possible ancestor symbols and the variations of the artifacts among houses suggests that the social differentiation of the Wansan society was probably related to the people’s ability to claim their association with the ancestors. Inspired from the concept of House Society, I thus propose that these residential houses in the Wansan society probably constituted several Houses. The House, which could probably assure their connections with the ancestors, had better knowledge regarding how to manipulate local resources. At the same time, the House could construct a wider social network to share 1 similar artifacts with other Houses in the society. On the contrary, Houses without the ancestral connections lacked the capability to fully explore local resources and were limited to certain options. As a result, the House’s disparate technological tradition expressed in the artifacts resulted from social differentiation that emerged with differential ability to affirm connections with their ancestors. 2 Dedicated to my parents, Sheng-kuei Chiang (江深貴) and Wen-ying Peng (彭文英), for their unconditional love and support i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of figures vii List of tables xi Acknowledgements xiv CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The House Society 2 1.2 House Societies in Taiwan 3 1.3 Questions 4 1.4 Methods 5 1.5 Results 5 1.6 Interpretation 6 1.7 Dissertation organization 7 CHAPTER 2: THEORETICAL FRAMWORK: THE HOUSE SOCIETY 10 2.1 Lévi-Strauss and the House Society 12 2.1.1 Lévi-Strauss: the concept of the House Society 12 2.1.2 Beyond Lévi-Strauss 14 2.2 House Society: some characteristics 15 2.2.1 House as a social unit: rethinking the meaning of kinship 16 2.2.2 House continuity and social memory 17 2.2.3 House as a ritual site 18 2.2.4 House as microcosm 18 2.3 House Society and archaeological research 20 2.3.1 House, heirloom, grave, and social relation and memory 22 2.3.2 Gender relations 23 2.3.C House as a microcosm 25 2.3.4 Temple as “ritual attractor”, as “holy houses” 26 2.4 Discussion 27 CHAPTER 3: HOUSE SOCIETIES IN TAIWAN 29 3.1. Research on Neolithic social organization in Taiwan 30 3.1.1 The prehistoric OLP society 30 3.1.2 The prehistoric Peinan society and the Ciyubin society 31 3.1.3 The impact of rescue archaeology 32 3.1.4 Summary 32 3.2. Linguistic reconstruction of the prehistoric Austronesian society 34 3.2.1 The Austronesian languages in Taiwan 34 3.2.2 The social organization of early Austronesian society: linguistic reconstruction 35 3.3. Ethnographic research on social organization of the Austronesian societies in Taiwan 36 3.3.1 Lineage-centered approach 36 3.2.2 House-centered approach 38 3.4. House society model as an interpretive framework for exploring Neolithic Taiwanese societies 40 ii 3.4.1 House structures 40 3.4.2 Burials 41 3.4.3 Anthropomorphic motif, inalienable possessions, heirloom valuables 43 3.5 Conclusion 45 CHAPTER 4: RESEARCH BACKGROUND: THE WANSAN SITE AND THE 1998 EXCAVATION 47 4.1 The Ilan Plain and the Wansan site 47 4.1.1 Natural environment: geologic formation, climate, Holocene transgression 49 4.1.2 Current population: the Austronesian peoples in Ilan 51 4.1.3 Previous research on the Wansan site 52 4.2 The 1998 excavation 53 4.2.1 Rescue archaeology 53 4.2.2 Excavation 53 4.2.2.A Excavation area 53 4.2.2.B Excavation method 55 4.2.3 stratigraphy 55 4.2.3.A The First Layer I (Recent agricultural field) 55 4.2.3.B The Second Layer 55 4.2.3.C The Third Layer(the Second Phase of the Settlement) 55 4.2.3.D The Fourth Layer (the initial phase of the Wansan society) 56 4.2.4 Radiocarbon dates 56 4.2.5 Empirical findings 59 4.2.5.A Features 59 4.2.5.B Artifacts 62 4.3 Discussion 66 CHAPTER 5:RESEARCH QUESTIONS, HYPOTHESES, DATASETS, AND METHODS 68 5.1 Questions and hypotheses 68 5.2 Datasets 69 5.3 Methods 70 5.3.1 Identifying dwellings from the distribution of postholes 70 5.3.2 Examining the presence of dwelling groups from the distribution of features and artifacts 73 5.3.3 Examining temporal change 73 5.3.4 Examining the association between ancestral rituals and the dwellings/ dwelling groups 74 5.3.5 Examining the association between the zoo-anthropomorphic objects with the dwellings/ dwelling groups 74 5.3.6 Analyzing the variety of artifacts among the dwellings 75 5.3.7 Analyzing artifact attributes among dwellings 76 5.4 Conclusion 77 iii CHAPTER 6: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF FEATURES: IDENTIFYING THE NUMBER AND EXTENT OF DWELLINGS 79 6.1 Identifying the number of dwellings: spatial distribution of postholes 79 6.1.1 The distribution of the postholes 80 6.1.2 Analysis of the horizontal distribution of postholes 80 6.1.2.A The Northern Excavation Area 80 6.1.2.B The Southern Excavation Area 82 6.1.3 Analysis of the depth of postholes 83 6.1.3.A The Northern Excavation Area 83 6.1.3.B The Southern Excavation Area 83 6.1.4 Summary 83 6.2 Identifying the extent of the dwellings: the spatial distribution of features 84 6.2.1 The distribution of the features 84 6.2.1.A Stone walls 84 6.2.1.B Hearths 84 6.2.1.C Stone tool workshop 85 6.2.1.D Storage pit: Underground carved holes 85 6.2.1.E Possible ritual locus 85 6.2.1.F Stone coffins 85 6.2.1.G Urn burials 85 6.2.2 Discussion: the possible number of dwellings 89 6.3 Identifying dwelling groups 91 6.3.1 Distribution of lithic artifacts 92 6.3.1.A The Northern Excavation Area 93 6.3.1.B The Southern Excavation Area 93 6.3.2 Distribution of pottery artifacts 96 6.3.2.A The Northern Excavation Area 97 6.3.2.B The Southern Excavation Area 98 6.3.3 Discussion: the number of dwelling groups 101 6.4 The spatial association between the identified dwellings and ritual activities 102 6.5 Summary: the development of the dwellings/ dwelling groups 103 CHAPTER 7: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ARTIFACTS:IDENTIFYING THE USE OF EACH HOUSE CLUSTER 105 7.1 The distribution of the zoo-anthropomorphic object 107 7.2 Lithic artifacts 111 7.2.1 Temporal change 111 7.2.2 Spatial variation 113 7.2.2.A The Initial Phase: the Fourth Layer 113 7.2.2.B The Second Phase: the Third Layer 116 7.2.3 Summary of the distribution of lithic artifacts 121 7.3 Pottery artifacts 123 7.3.1 Temporal change 123 7.3.2 Spatial variation 124 7.3.2.A The Initial Stage: The Fourth Layer 124 iv 7.3.2.B The second Phase: The Third Layer 131 7.3.3 Summary of pottery artifacts 138 7.4 Discussion: daily life in the Houses 139 CHAPTER 8: SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF ARTIFACTS WITH DIFFERENT ATTRIBUTES 141 8.1 The distribution of jade artifacts among dwellings 142 8.1.1 The variations of artifact type among dwellings 142 8.1.2 The variations of the artifact attributes 145 8.1.3 Summary 147 8.2 The distribution of lithic artifacts with different attributes among dwellings 147 8.2.1 Raw Material 148 8.2.2 Stylistic attributes 154 8.2.2.A Knife 154 8.2.2.B Adze-axe 158 8.2.2.C Arrowhead 160 8.2.2.D Spearhead 164 8.2.2.E Net sinker 165 8.2.2.F Bracelet/earring 167 8.2.3 Summary of lithic artifacts 171 8.3 The distribution of pottery artifacts with different attributes among dwellings 172 8.3.1 Vessels 172 8.3.1.A The distribution of ware types among dwellings/ dwelling groups 173 8.3.1.B The distribution of rim forms among dwellings/ dwelling groups 175 8.3.1.C The distribution of other parts of jars among dwellings/ dwelling groups 178 8.3.2 Non-vessel 184 8.3.2.A Spindle whorl 184 8.3.2.B Bracelet 186 8.3.2.C Figurine 188 8.3.3 Summary of pottery 189 8.4 Summary: difference between the dwellings/ dwelling groups 190 CHAPTER 9: DISCUSSION
Recommended publications
  • Safety of Immigrant, Refugee and Non-Status Women Annotated Bibliography
    Safety of Immigrant, Refugee and Non-Status Women Annotated Bibliography By Ju Hui Judy Han June 9, 2009 1. Research Reports (in chronological order) Sponsorship... For Better or for Worse: The Impact of Sponsorship on the Equality Rights of Immigrant Women (2001) (246 pages) Funded by the Status of Women Canada’s Policy Research Fund and the Joint Centre of Excellence for Research on Immigration and Settlement (CERIS) in Toronto. The report criticizes the detrimental effects of the “sponsorship regime,” defined as the constellation of various laws, regulations and guidelines from the federal and provincial governments defining sponsorship, the obligations of sponsored persons and their sponsors.” It discusses misunderstandings of sponsorship, integration barriers, and spousal maltreatment, and concludes that sponsorship “poses the question of the responsibility of the family to ensure the well-being and the socio-economic security of its members in relation to the state.” The report finds that given “the fact that sponsorship involves the undertaking of responsibility for women by the spouse, the fact that the application for permanent residence may be refused if the spouse withdraws his sponsorship and the fact that the access of sponsored women to social assistance is limited by provincial regulations (and remains so for the entire duration of the sponsorship, even after citizenship has been obtained), mean that the equality rights of women immigrants are being violated. Indeed, our research revealed that the sponsorship regime has
    [Show full text]
  • St. Joseph's College for Women, Tirupur, Tamilnadu
    ==================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 Vol. 18:10 October 2018 India’s Higher Education Authority UGC Approved List of Journals Serial Number 49042 ==================================================================== St. Joseph’s College for Women, Tirupur, Tamilnadu R. Rajalakshmi, Editor Select Papers from the Conference Reading the Nation – The Global Perspective • Greetings from the Principal ... Rev. Sr. Dr. Kulandai Therese. A i • Editor's Preface ... R. Rajalakshmi, Assistant Professor and Head Department of English ii • Caste and Nation in Indian Society ... CH. Chandra Mouli & B. Sridhar Kumar 1-16 =============================================================================== Language in India www.languageinindia.com ISSN 1930-2940 18:10 October 2018 R. Rajalakshmi, Editor: Reading the Nation – The Global Perspective • Nationalism and the Postcolonial Literatures ... Dr. K. Prabha 17-21 • A Study of Men-Women Relationship in the Selected Novels of Toni Morrison ... G. Giriya, M.A., B.Ed., M.Phil., Ph.D. Research Scholar & Dr. M. Krishnaraj 22-27 • Historicism and Animalism – Elements of Convergence in George Orwell’s Animal Farm ... Ms. Veena SP 28-34 • Expatriate Immigrants’ Quandary in the Oeuvres of Bharati Mukherjee ... V. Jagadeeswari, Assistant Professor of English 35-41 • Post-Colonial Reflections in Peter Carey’s Journey of a Lifetime ... Meera S. Menon II B.A. English Language & Literature 42-45 • Retrieval of the Mythical and Dalit Imagination in Cho Dharman’s Koogai: The Owl ... R. Murugesan Ph.D. Research Scholar 46-50 • Racism in Nadine Gordimer’s The House Gun ... Mrs. M. Nathiya Assistant Professor 51-55 • Mysteries Around the Sanctum with Special Reference To The Man From Chinnamasta by Indira Goswami ... Mrs. T. Vanitha, M.A., M.Ed., M.Phil., Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering Clan in Tibet
    Are We Legend? Reconsidering Clan in Tibet Jonathan Samuels (University of Heidelberg) 1. Introduction ibetan Studies is relatively familiar with the theme of clan. The so-called “Tibetan ancestral clans” regularly feature in T works of Tibetan historiography, and have been the subject of several studies.1 Dynastic records and genealogies, often labelled “clan histories,” have been examined, and attempts have been made to identify ancient Tibetan clan territories.2 Various ethnographic and anthropological studies have also dealt both with the concept of clan membership amongst contemporary populations and a supposed Tibetan principle of descent, according to which the “bone”- substance (rus pa), the metonym for clan, is transmitted from father to progeny.3 Can it be said, however, that we have a coherent picture of clan in Tibet, particularly from a historical perspective? The present article has two aims. Firstly, by probing the current state of our understanding, it draws attention to key unanswered questions pertaining to clans and descent, and attempts to sharpen the discussion surrounding them. Secondly, exploring new avenues of research, it considers the extent to which we may distinguish between idealised representation and social reality within relevant sections of traditional hagiographical literature. 2. Current Understanding: Anthropological Studies and their Relevance Current understanding of Tibetan clans and descent rules has been 4 informed by several anthropological studies, including those of 1 Stein 1961; Karmay [1986] 1998; Vitali 2003. 2 Dotson 2012. 3 Oppitz 1973; Aziz 1974; Levine 1984. 4 The “current understanding” referred to here is that prevalent amongst members of the Tibetan Studies community; I address the way that evidence from Jonathan Samuels, “Are We Legend? Reconsidering Clan in Tibet,” Revue d’Etudes Tibétaines, no.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Possessions Material Culture Behind Closed Doors
    Home Possessions This page intentionally left blank Home Possessions Material Culture behind Closed Doors Edited by Daniel Miller Oxford • New York First published in 2001 by Berg Editorial offices: 150 Cowley Road, Oxford, OX4 1JJ, UK 838 Broadway, Third Floor, New York, NY 10003-4812, USA © Daniel Miller 2001 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means without the written permission of Berg. Berg is an imprint of Oxford International Publishers Ltd. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the Library of Congress. British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. ISBN 1 85973 580 0 (Cloth) ISBN 1 85973 585 1 (Paper) Typeset by JS Typesetting, Wellingborough, Northants Printed in the United Kingdom by Biddles Ltd, Guildford and King’s Lynn Chang-Kwo’s parents, Stephen Frosh, Helene, Jef and Mariette, Joseph Kushner, George and Katy, Orange, Skien Friends, Susannah This page intentionally left blank Contents List of Figures ix Acknowledgements xi 1 Behind Closed Doors Daniel Miller 1 Part I Mobile Homes 2 The Aesthetics of Social Aspiration Alison J. Clarke 23 3 Organized Disorder: Moving Furniture in Norwegian Homes Pauline Garvey 47 4 The Refurbishment of Memory Jean-Sébastien Marcoux 69 5 The Taste of Home Elia Petridou 87 Part II Estate Agency 6 Possessions Daniel Miller 107 7 Home Sweet Home: Tangible Memories of an Uprooted Childhood Anat Hecht 123 Part III Building Relationships 8 Building Conjugal Relations: The Devotion to Houses amongst the Paiwan of Taiwan Chang-Kwo Tan 149 – vii – Contents 9 A Man will get Furnished: Wood and Domesticity in Urban Romania Adam Drazin 173 10 The ‘Untidy’ Japanese House Inge Maria Daniels 201 Index 231 – viii – List of Figures 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Blood and Bone
    chapter x Blood and bone Recognition of kinship rests upon notions of shared substance, which are differently formulated from society to society. In this chapter, I show how Toraja conceptions of inherited substance are articulated with house mem- bership, rights of inheritance, and the ceremonial obligations which both of these involve. The images used to speak of these things are revealing of how relationships and responsibilities are thought of, and hence of ‘kinship’ as an ideology shaping the social world within which people act. Anthropological analyses of kinship have traditionally taken the system of terminology as a starting point. But the terminology of a cognatic system like that of the Toraja appears to be so simple that it can at best give only a very hazy impression of how kinship actually functions in everyday life. In practice, we find that how terms are actually used often bears little relation to genealogi- cal reality. Rather than constructing formal models derived from terminology, then, I am concerned with what Bourdieu (1977:37) has called ‘practical’ as opposed to ‘official’ kinship. Kinship provides a set of ideas that carry moral force and which are put to tactical use in daily life (Bloch 1971b). Pursuing a similarly processual line of analysis, Benjamin (2004) proposes that kinship systems be thought of as providing distinctive modes of consciousness, which mediate people’s actions in the world and shape group strategies and identities in subtle yet far-reaching ways. It has been repeatedly pointed out, too, that ‘kinship’, often essentialised in anthropology as the foundation of social organ- ization, is often difficult to separate from other forms of relatedness, an argu- ment recently re-explored by Carsten (2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Storm Over Circling Dawn...P.5 DAWN Hung* Ti-NAFT
    Specia.ra\l c:ou©aLxD9GoUectAonSs osnaSeriail APR 1993 Storm over Circling Dawn...p.5 CMPA $2.25 «f« DAWN Hung* ti-NAFT INSTDF News <INESI A caravan to walk all over NAFTA 3 W01-1720 Grant Str< by Ellen Woodsworth 'ancouver, BC V5L 2 Dusk for DAWN? 3 Tel: (604)255-5499 Fax:(604)255-5511 by Susan Briscoe Loss, win or draw for lesbian rights 4 Kinesis welcomes volunteers to work o by Shannon e. Ash all aspects of the paper. Our next Moge after marriage 4 Writers' Meeting is Apr 5 for the May issue at 7 pm at Kinesis. All women by Lissa Geller welcome even if you don't have Poster campaign against Circling Dawn strikes nerve 5 experience. by Jackie Brown New refugee guidelines count women in 5 Kinesis is published ten times a year b the Vancouver Status of Women. I by Smita Patil objectives are to be a non-sectarian feminist voice for women and to work actively for social change, specifically combatting sexism, racism,classism, homophobia, ableism, and imperialism. Features Views expressed in Kinesis are tr Mexico still says no to NAFTA 8 e writer and do not necessarily Detail of On To Ottawa Caravan route 3 VSW policy. All unsigned materia by Patricia Hume and Ellen Woodsworth responsibility of the Kinesis Edi Dialing pro-choice in Ireland 9 by Erin Mullan IWD Speaking out at the International Women's Day rally 10 speeches by Jane Gottfriedsen, Raminder Dosangh, Miche Hill, Anju Gogia, Fatima Jaffer, Shelagh Day, Carmela Allevato Commentary Feminism and the politics of engagement.
    [Show full text]
  • Laskar Jihad Islam, Militancy and the Quest for Identity in Post-New Order Indonesia
    LASKAR JIHAD ISLAM, MILITANCY AND THE QUEST FOR IDENTITY IN POST-NEW ORDER INDONESIA Laskar Jihad Islam, strijdvaardig activisme en de zoektocht naar identiteit in het Indonesië na de val van de Nieuwe Orde (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de Rector Magnificus, Prof. Dr. W.H. Gispen, ingevolge het besluit van het College voor Promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 14 juni 2005 des ochtends te 10.30 uur door Noorhaidi geboren op 7 december 1971 te Amuntai, Indonesië Promotor : Prof. Dr. M.M. van Bruinessen (Universiteit Utrecht, Faculteit der Letteren en International Institute for the Study of Islam in the Modern World) Het onderzoek voor deze dissertatie werd verricht in het kader van het KNAW prioriteitsprogramma "The Dissemination of Religious Authority in Twentieth-Century Indonesia", dat wordt uitgevoerd aan het IIAS. Dit promotieonderzoek werd mede mogelijk gemaakt door aanvullende financiële steun van het CNWS en het ISIM. LASKAR JIHAD ISLAM, MILITANCY AND THE QUEST FOR IDENTITY IN POST-NEW ORDER INDONESIA Noorhaidi Cover page design: Noorhaidi Photo: Gatra 24:7 (5 May 2001) v ABSTRACT This study analyses the intellectual and political history of Laskar Jihad, the most spectacular Muslim paramilitary group that emerged in Indonesia in the aftermath of the collapse of the New Order regime in May 1998. Using an interpretive framework derived from social movement theory and identity politics, this study exposes the roots of the group and its transformation into a militant, jihadist movement. Based on extensive fieldwork, numerous interviews and a study of the movement’s literature, this study demonstrates that the very existence of Laskar Jihad cannot be dissociated from Saudi Arabia’s immensely ambitious global campaign for the Wahhabization of the Muslim umma.
    [Show full text]
  • Claude Lvistrauss (19082009): the Apotheosis of Heroic Anthropology
    Claude Lévi-Strauss (1908-2009) The apotheosis of heroic anthropology Albert Doja Claude Lévi-Strauss died on 30 October 2009. He lived Albert Doja is an Honorary to be a hundred years old and is widely recognized as Research Fellow at the Department of Anthropology, ‘the father of modern anthropology’. Here, Albert Doja University College London, assesses his influence on the discipline and beyond. [Ed.] and Professor of Sociology and Anthropology at the European University, Tirana. The centrality of Claude Lévi-Strauss in the evolution He gained his PhD in social of 20th-century thought shows how he marked the very anthropology from the meaning of the last century and what he might have prom- École des Hautes Études en ised for 21st-century anthropology. Centenary celebra- Sciences Sociales in Paris in 1 2 1993 and is a former research tions and obituaries appeared in a number of places, as fellow of the Laboratoire many anthropologists have written and will continue to d’Anthropologie Sociale write about his life, works, legacy, and his immense contri- founded by Claude Lévi- Strauss. He has held several butions to anthropology. His corpus of work is far-reaching academic positions in France, and comprehensive in scope, encompassing methodology, Britain, Ireland and Albania philosophy, history, humanism, mythology, linguistics, and in 2008 was elected aesthetics, cognition and reasoning. However, his work is to the Albanian Academy of Sciences. His email is often misunderstood and his continuing relevance for con- [email protected]. temporary theory must be acknowledged and accounted for. This is in my view the best way to commemorate his legacy to anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Idioms of House Society in the Leh Area (Ladakh)1
    ‘The More Things Change, the More They Stay the Same’: Idioms of House Society in the Leh Area (Ladakh)1 Sophie Day Introduction I had a strange sense of déjà-vu writing this essay as I found myself thinking about virtually the same issues as I had before, during and after my doctoral fieldwork in the early 1980s, along with colleagues working on the household and contemplating the impact of the by-then solid and militarised borders surrounding Ladakh. At that time, we learned that households were named property-holding units that lasted over time. We were struggling to work out the relative importance of the conjugal tie, the sibling group, the phaspun (a handful of houses joined for ritual purposes in the Leh area), legal title and state or religious dues in reproducing the corporate unit. The Buddhist smallholdings among which we were then working are known as tronpa (grong ba),2 containing one or more houses: a main or ‘big house’ (khang chen) and one or more offshoot ‘small houses’ (khangun; khang chung). The small houses held an older ‘retired’ generation and individuals who did not or could not marry, given the local ideal of just one marriage per generation per household.3 These latter residences, we were told, always reverted to the main house each generation. I worked closely with colleagues from my undergraduate days among whom Maria Phylactou (1989) contributed much to our understanding of the position of younger brothers, and Nicola Grist (1993) to commonalities among Muslim and Buddhist households across Ladakh. They asked whether siblings were now establishing independent households and whether the apparent contrasts within Ladakh that pitted Buddhist non- division against Muslim practices of household division, fuelling in turn a highly charged politics relating to intermarriage and population growth, had any empirical foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovering Dualism in the Pueblo Past Carrie Heitman University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Anthropology Faculty Publications Anthropology, Department of 2006 Kinship and the Dynamics of the House: Rediscovering Dualism in the Pueblo Past Carrie Heitman University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Stephen Plog University of Virginia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Heitman, Carrie and Plog, Stephen, "Kinship and the Dynamics of the House: Rediscovering Dualism in the Pueblo Past" (2006). Anthropology Faculty Publications. 76. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub/76 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Catalyst 04 9/13/05 10:31 AM Page 69 In A Catalyst for Ideas: Anthropological Archaeology and the Legacy of Douglas W. Schwartz, edited by Vernon Scarborough, pp. 69-100. School of American Research Press, Santa Fe. 4 Kinship and the Dynamics of the House Rediscovering Dualism in the Pueblo Past Carolyn Heitman and Stephen Plog Even if we grant that the Keresans came from the San Juan [Basin]— which I am inclined to believe since it is their own tradition—this does not rule out the possibility that they came equipped with moieties as well as clans and the rest. The Anasazi peoples practiced irrigation and built huge communal houses. Chaco towns have two large Kivas. It is not impos- sible that a moiety system was some sort of response to these conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Household Archaeology and Reconstructing Social Organization
    Anthropology Faculty Publications Anthropology 2001 Household Archaeology and Reconstructing Social Organization in Ancient Complex Societies: A Consideration of Models and Concepts Based on Study of the Prehispanic Maya Julia A. Hendon Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/anthfac Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Hendon, Julia A. 2001. Household Archaeology and Reconstructing Social Organization in Ancient Complex Societies: A Consideration of Models and Concepts Based on Study of the Prehispanic Maya. Paper presented at the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Washington, DC. This is the authors's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/anthfac/12 This open access article is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Household Archaeology and Reconstructing Social Organization in Ancient Complex Societies: A Consideration of Models and Concepts Based on Study of the Prehispanic Maya Abstract Studies of the settlement pattern in the Copan Valley, Honduras, indicate that a House society model provides the best way to understand the social organization of the Late Classic period Maya. The ousH e society model, based on Levi-Strauss's original work but since modified by anthropologists and archaeologists, does not replace household archaeology. Instead, the model allows archaeologists to discuss the continuation of social identity over time.
    [Show full text]
  • The House That Morgan Built
    THE HOUSE THAT MORGAN BUILT Thomas R. Trautmann Department of History University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan USA [email protected] L.H. Morgan’s kinship work began and ended with the Iroquois longhouse, and the Iro- quois kinship system that it shaped and by which it was shaped. Kinship became a house for anthropology, shaping and being shaped by the emerging discipline. Much of the house that Morgan built for anthropology still stands, including the last book, on houses and house-life, which seems to anticipate the current literature on houses and house- societies. I continue in my belief that Morgan is “good to think,” to use the memorable phrase of a recently-departed colleague. Lévi-Strauss thought so, and dedicated his big book of kinship to Morgan by way of honoring his pioneering work and the American school of anthropology that he founded and with which Lévi-Strauss was associated during the war years, “recalling that this school was especially great at a time when scientific precision and exact observation did not seem to him to be incompatible with a frankly theoretical mode of thought and a bold philosophical taste.” (Lévi-Strauss 1969:xxvi) The compli- ment to American anthropology was at the same time an implied criticism of the Boasian refusal of theory and bold philosophical taste, which so bedeviled American anthropolo- gists’ relation to Morgan. Lévi-Strauss and many others have looked past the manifest evolutionism of Morgan’s mature work and found therein resources for current research, not just the record of a past that is dead.
    [Show full text]