Game Design Documentation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Game Design Documentation APPENDIX A Game Design Documentation While you will learn many technical and practical aspects of game development as you work through the example projects in this book, it is equally important to have a solid foundation in the theoretical aspects of game design. The first effort to create a framework for these concepts was discussed in a paper published by Robin Hunicke, Marc LeBlanc, and Robert Zubek in 2004.1 In it, they proposed the Mechanics-Dynamics-Aesthetics (MDA) framework, which provides a useful way to categorize the components of a game. They defined Mechanics as the formal rules of the game, expressed at the level of data structures and algorithms, Dynamics as the interaction between the player and the game mechanics while the game is in progress, and Aesthetics as the emotional responses experienced by players as they interact with the game. Since then, other frameworks have been proposed, each of which provides a different way of analyzing games. A popular example is Jesse Schell’s Elemental Tetrad,2 which consists of Mechanics, Story, Aesthetics, and Technology (where aesthetics is defined more broadly than in the original MDA framework). Frameworks such as these are valuable tools to help people consistently and fully analyze games. Players can use frameworks to better understand and express what they enjoy about particular games. Developers can use the formal structure to help them create a more cohesive design and to organize and document the development process; explaining how to write such documentation is the goal of this appendix. A game design document (GDD) serves as the blueprint or master plan for creating a game: it describes the overall vision of a game, as well as the details (often based on a game design framework such as MDA). Practical aspects are also included, such as a schedule that lists when certain features will be completed, a list of team members and responsibilities, and plans for testing and releasing the game. A GDD can provide clarity and focus, while serving as a guide and a reference to the person or people working on the game. To be most effective, the GDD should be as complete as possible before the development process begins. Depending on the flexibility of the developers, a certain amount of modification may be permitted over the course of development, and various adjustments may need to be made after collecting feedback from gameplay testing. 1Hunicke, LeBlanc, and Zubek. “MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Research.” Proceedings of the Nineteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2004. 2Schell. The Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. CRC Press, 2008. © Lee Stemkoski and Evan Leider 2017 231 L. Stemkoski and E. Leider, Game Development with Construct 2, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4842-2784-8 APPENDIX A ■ GaME DESIgN DOCUMENTaTION There is no one standard format for game design documents; an Internet search will provide many templates for a variety of development scenarios. GDD templates often contain a bulleted list of topics or questions for your consideration (when applicable). In what follows, we present a similar list of questions for you to ponder as you design your own games; the scope of these questions is particularly good for individual developers or small teams working on projects with game engine software such as Construct 2. By recording detailed responses to the following queries, you will effectively create your own game design document to help guide you through the development process. 1. Overall vision. a. Write a short paragraph (three to six sentences) explaining your game. (This is sometimes called the elevator pitch: a short summary used to quickly and simply describe an idea or product during a 30-second elevator ride.) b. How would you describe the genre(s)? Is it single- player or multiplayer (and if the latter, cooperative or competitive)? c. What is the target audience? Include demographics (the age, interests, and game experience of potential players), the game platform (desktop, console, or smartphone), and any special equipment required (such as gamepads). d. Why will people want to play this game? What features distinguish this game from similar titles? What is the hook that will get people interested at first, how will the game keep people interested, and what makes it fun? 2. Mechanics: the rules of the game world. (Note that the following questions are phrased in terms of the game’s main character, as distinguished from the player, since the player is the focus of the section on dynamics. However, if no such character exists, the player can be considered as the character.) a. What are the character’s goals? These may be divided into short-term, medium-term, and long-term goals. b. What abilities does the character have? This should include any action the character is capable of performing, such as moving, attacking, defending, collecting items, interacting with the environment, and so forth. Describe the abilities or actions in detail; for example, how high can the character jump? Can the character both walk and run? 232 APPENDIX A ■ GaME DESIgN DOCUMENTaTION c. What obstacles or difficulties will the character face? Some obstacles are active (such as enemies, projectiles, or traps) and should be described in detail (how they affect the player, their location, their movement patterns, and so forth). Other obstacles are passive (such as doors that need to be unlocked, mazes that need to be navigated, puzzles that need to be solved, or time limits that need to be to beat). How can the character overcome these obstacles (items, weapons, spells, quick reflexes)? d. What items can the character obtain? What are their effects, where are they obtained, and how frequently do they appear? e. What resources must be managed (such as health, money, energy, and experience)? How are these resources obtained and used? Are they limited? f. Describe the game world environment. How large is the world (relative to the screen)? Are there multiple rooms or regions? Is the gameplay linear or open? In other words, is there a strictly linear progression of levels or tasks to complete, or can the character select levels, explore the world, and complete quests at will? 3. Dynamics: the interaction between the player and the game mechanics. a. What hardware is required by the game (keyboard, mouse, speakers, gamepad, touchscreen)? Which keys/ buttons are used, and what are their effects? How is the player informed of the control scheme (a separate manual document, game menus, tutorials, or in-game signs)? b. What type of proficiency will the player need to develop to become proficient at the game? Are there any complex actions that can be created from combinations of basic game mechanics? Do the game mechanics or game world environment directly or indirectly encourage the player to develop or discourage any particular play strategies? Does the player’s performance affect the gameplay mechanics (as in feedback loops)? c. What gameplay data is displayed during the game (such as points, health, items collected, time remaining)? Where is this information displayed on the screen? How is the information conveyed (text, icons, charts, status bars)? 233 APPENDIX A ■ GaME DESIgN DOCUMENTaTION d. What menus, screens, or overlays will there be (title screen, help/instructions, credits, game over)? How does the player switch between screens, and which screens can be accessed from each other? e. How does the player interact with the game at the software level (pause, quit, restart, control volume)? 4. Aesthetics: the visual, audio, narrative, and psychological aspects of the game; these are the elements that most directly affect the player’s experience. a. Describe the style and feel of the game. Does the game take place in a world that is rural, technological, or magical? Does the game world feel cluttered or sparse, ordered or chaotic, geometric or organic? Is the mood lighthearted or serious? Is the pace relaxing or frenetic? All the aesthetic elements discussed should work together and contribute to create a coherent and cohesive theme. b. Does the game use pixel art, line art, or realistic graphics? Are the colors bright or dark, varied or monochromatic, shiny or dull? Will there be value-based or image-based animations? Are there any special effects? Create a list of graphics you will need. c. What style of background music or ambient sounds will the game use? What sound effects will be used for character actions or for interactions with enemies, objects, and the environment? Will there be sound effects corresponding to interactions with the user interface? List all the music and sounds you will need. d. What is the relevant backstory for the game? What is the character’s motivation for pursuing their goal? Will there be a plot or storyline that unfolds as the player progresses through the game? e. What emotional state(s) does the game try to provoke: happiness, excitement, calm, surprise, pride, sadness, tension, fear, frustration? f. What makes the game “fun”? Some players may enjoy the graphics, music, story, or emotions evoked by the game. Other features players might enjoy include the following: i. Fantasy (simulating experiences one doesn’t have in real life) ii. Role-playing (identifying with a character) 234 APPENDIX A ■ GaME DESIgN DOCUMENTaTION iii. Competition (against other players or against records previously set by oneself) iv. Cooperation (working with others toward a common goal) v. Compassion (providing assistance or rescuing others) vi. Discovery (finding objects or exploring a world) vii. Overcoming challenges (such as defeating enemies or solving puzzles) viii. Collection (including game items or badges/ trophies for achievements) ix. Social aspects (both within the game and the communities that form around the game) 5.
Recommended publications
  • Journal of Games Is Here to Ask Himself, "What Design-Focused Pre- Hideo Kojima Need an Editor?" Inferiors
    WE’RE PROB NVENING ABLY ALL A G AND CO BOUT V ONFERRIN IDEO GA BOUT C MES ALSO A JournalThe IDLE THUMBS of Games Ultraboost Ad Est’d. 2004 TOUCHING THE INDUSTRY IN A PROVOCATIVE PLACE FUN FACTOR Sessions of Interest Former developers Game Developers Confer We read the program. sue 3D Realms Did you? Probably not. Read this instead. Computer game entreprenuers claim by Steve Gaynor and Chris Remo Duke Nukem copyright Countdown to Tears (A history of tears?) infringement Evolving Game Design: Today and Tomorrow, Eastern and Western Game Design by Chris Remo Two founders of long-defunct Goichi Suda a.k.a. SUDA51 Fumito Ueda British computer game developer Notable Industry Figure Skewered in Print Crumpetsoft Disk Systems have Emil Pagliarulo Mark MacDonald sued 3D Realms, claiming the lat- ter's hit game series Duke Nukem Wednesday, 10:30am - 11:30am infringes copyright of Crumpetsoft's Room 132, North Hall vintage game character, The Duke of industry session deemed completely unnewswor- Newcolmbe. Overview: What are the most impor- The character's first adventure, tant recent trends in modern game Yuan-Hao Chiang The Duke of Newcolmbe Finds Himself design? Where are games headed in the thy, insightful next few years? Drawing on their own in a Bit of a Spot, was the Walton-on- experiences as leading names in game the-Naze-based studio's thirty-sev- design, the panel will discuss their an- enth game title. Released in 1986 for swers to these questions, and how they the Amstrad CPC 6128, it features see them affecting the industry both in Japan and the West.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Schools for Aspiring Game Developers
    THE BEST SCHOOLS FOR ASPIRING GAME DEVELOPERS THE BEST GAME Whether you’re taking your first steps or refining your skills, there’s DESIGN PROGRAMS, a game design program for anyone. Check out the 50 best RANKED BY THE undergraduate and 25 best PRINCETON REVIEW. graduate programs out there. Even in these ridiculous times, video games you want to use your artistic flourish to are there to comfort, challenge, and inspire design fascinating worlds and new us. It takes a lot of work to make your characters? Do you want to manage the favorite games, though, and a lot of business of running a studio? Or do you smarts. It’s dangerous to go alone, as one want to get your hands dirty in the coding famous adventure told us, and that’s where and programming that makes games run? awaiting new image these game design programs come in. Maybe you’re also looking to master your The Princeton Review has done all the skill set with a graduate degree. & cut out heavy lifting of researching the absolute Every adventurer knows that the first best game design programs across North steps can often be the most important. America and Europe. Whether it’s the best If you’re ready to take that leap, read teachers, the most prestigious graduates, on to find out where you should start the best facilities, or the highest average your journey. salary, you’ll find a great school for you. Want to know more? Check out The So take a moment to think about what Princeton Review’s website for further info: kind of game developer you’d like to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Booklet
    30th Oct - 1st Nov CONFERENCE BOOKLET 1 2 3 INTRO REBOOT DEVELOP RED | 2019 y Always Outnumbered, Never Outgunned Warmest welcome to first ever Reboot Develop it! And we are here to stay. Our ambition through Red conference. Welcome to breathtaking Banff the next few years is to turn Reboot Develop National Park and welcome to iconic Fairmont Red not just in one the best and biggest annual Banff Springs. It all feels a bit like history repeating games industry and game developers conferences to me. When we were starting our European older in Canada and North America, but in the world! sister, Reboot Develop Blue conference, everybody We are committed to stay at this beautiful venue was full of doubts on why somebody would ever and in this incredible nature and astonishing choose a beautiful yet a bit remote place to host surroundings for the next few forthcoming years one of the biggest worldwide gatherings of the and make it THE annual key gathering spot of the international games industry. In the end, it turned international games industry. We will need all of into one of the biggest and highest-rated games your help and support on the way! industry conferences in the world. And here we are yet again at the beginning, in one of the most Thank you from the bottom of the heart for all beautiful and serene places on Earth, at one of the the support shown so far, and even more for the most unique and luxurious venues as well, and in forthcoming one! the company of some of the greatest minds that the games industry has to offer! _Damir Durovic
    [Show full text]
  • The Shape of Games to Come: Critical Digital Storytelling in the Era of Communicative Capitalism
    The Shape of Games to Come: Critical Digital Storytelling in the Era of Communicative Capitalism by Sarah E. Thorne A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Cultural Mediations Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario © 2018, Sarah E. Thorne Abstract The past decade has seen an increase in the availability of user-friendly game development software, the result of which has been the emergence of a genre of reflexive and experimental games. Pippin Barr, La Molleindustria’s Paolo Pedercini, and Davey Wreden are exemplary in their thoughtful engagement with an ever-expanding list of subjects, including analyses and critiques of game development, popular culture, and capitalism. These works demonstrate the power of games as a site for critical media theory. This potential, however, is hindered by the player-centric trends in the game industry that limit the creative freedom of developers whose work is their livelihood. In the era of communicative capitalism, Jodi Dean argues that the commodification of communication has suspended narrative in favour of the circulation of fragmented and digestible opinions, which not only facilitates the distribution and consumption of communication, but also safeguards communicative capitalism against critique. Ultimately, the very same impulse that drives communicative capitalism is responsible for the player-centric trends that some developers view as an obstacle to their art. Critical game studies has traditionally fallen into two categories: those that emphasize the player as the locus of critique, such as McKenzie Wark’s trifler or Mary Flanagan’s critical play, and those that emphasize design, as in Alexander Galloway’s countergaming, Ian Bogost’s procedural rhetoric, and Gonzalo Frasca’s theory of simulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Gameplay Researching and Testing Nintendo’S Game Design
    Designing Gameplay Researching and testing Nintendo’s game design Malin Ribäck Arcada Biblioteket och Språkenheten Helsingfors 2019 EXAMENSARBETE Arcada Utbildningsprogram: Mediekultur Identifikationsnummer: 6847 Författare: Malin Ribäck Arbetets namn: Gameplays design – Undersökning och test av Nintendos speldesign Handledare (Arcada): Mirko Ahonen Uppdragsgivare: Sammandrag: Studien gick ut på att utforska hur spelföretaget Nintendo designar gameplay. För att testa resultaten i praktiken skapades ett game design-dokument. Därför börjar arbetet med att diskutera vad game design-dokument är och vad de används för. Game design-dokumentet som gjordes i samband med studien är en kombination av det huvudsakliga game design- dokumentet och ett konceptdokument. Därför tar arbetet också upp skillnaderna mellan dessa dokument. För att utreda hur Nintendo designar gameplay utfördes en litteraturundersökning. Materialet som användes i litteraturundersökningen består av intervjuer. Majoriteten av intervjuerna härstammar från Nintendos egen hemsida. För att utforma en teori tar arbetet upp några befintliga teorier för hur Nintendo designar sina spel. För att kunna diskutera Nintendos gameplay definieras gameplays koncept genom att diskutera olika definitioner av olika författare som tar upp ämnet i fråga. Litteraturundersökningen inleds med en presentation av varifrån materialet för studien har kommit. Inledningsvis tar också arbetet upp två viktiga spelutvecklare från Nintendo, för att ge insikt i varför just de personerna är viktiga. För att presentera en helhet över hur Nintendo designar gameplay studeras, organiseras, presenteras och diskuteras innehållet från litteraturundersökningen. Resultatet från undersökningen visar bland annat att när Nintendo designar sina spel, fokuserar man på följande saker: Att göra spelen användarvänliga, att formge dem enligt deras funktion, att göra spelvärlden responsiv i förhållande till spelaren och att undvika störa eller avbryta spelarens inlevelse i spelet.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Implementation of a Single-Player First-Person Shooter Game Using XNA Game Development Studio
    Final Report Design and implementation of a single-player first-person shooter game using XNA game development studio Master of Science Thesis in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering Hatice Ezgi TUGLU Kahraman AKYIL Chalmers University of Technology Department of Computer Science and Engineering Göteborg, Sweden, 2010 The Author grants to Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg the non-exclusive right to publish the Work electronically and in a non-commercial purpose make it accessible on the Internet. The Author warrants that he/she is the author to the Work, and warrants that the Work does not contain text, pictures or other material that violates copyright law. The Author shall, when transferring the rights of the Work to a third party (for example a publisher or a company), acknowledge the third party about this agreement. If the Author has signed a copyright agreement with a third party regarding the Work, the Author warrants hereby that he/she has obtained any necessary permission from this third party to let Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg store the Work electronically and make it accessible on the Internet. Design and implementation of a single-player first-person shooter game using XNA game development studio Hatice Ezgi TUGLU Kahraman AKYIL © Hatice Ezgi TUGLU, October 2010. © Kahraman AKYIL, October 2010. Examiner: Per ZARING Chalmers University of Technology University of Gothenburg Department of Computer Science and Engineering SE-412 96 Göteborg Sweden Telephone + 46 (0)31-772 1000 Department of Computer Science and Engineering Göteborg, Sweden October 2010 1 | P a g e HUMANKILLERS Will you keep your promise? 2 | P a g e Abstract “Humankillers” is a name of the game that was developed for Master Thesis in Computer Science Department at Chalmers University of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • 賽車遊戲的視角之研究A Study of Viewing Angle in Racing Video Game
    國立交通大學 應用藝術研究所視覺傳達設計組 碩士論文 賽車遊戲的視角之研究 A Study of Viewing Angle in Racing Video Game 指導教授:張恬君博士 研究生:曹訓誌 中華民國九十四年七月 i 摘要 電動遊戲裡所呈現真實感是一個簡化後的真實,這和真實世界裡的真實感 其實是不一樣的。先前的許多研究並未針對遊戲裡的物理行為、視覺效果如何影 響玩家的感受等議題做進一步的探討。本研究是針對賽車遊戲裡的遊戲視角做研 究與分析,研究中發現速度的快慢,與路旁有無參考物對視角大小(路寬)的認知 沒有影響,但是視野大小的寬與窄對視角有顯著的影響。除此之外,在本次研究 的條件下,速度的快慢、路旁有無參考物、視野大小的寬與窄對女性受試者視角 大小的認知均沒有影響,但視野大小的寬與窄(Y 方向)對男性受試者的視角大小 的認知有影響。另外,有 33%受試者會將路寬調整至接近視野的寬度(X 方向) , 這群受試者中又以男性受試者佔大多數(91%),相較之下女性受試者這個現象較 不明顯。此外, 受試者喜愛與不喜愛賽車電玩之間也沒有顯著的差異。 關鍵字:電動遊戲、賽車遊戲、視角。 ii Abstract The realistic world of video game is different from reality, it only provide reduced reality to players. This study focus on the viewing angle of racing video game, and try to understand how the viewing angle influence of the speed of moving, side walk object and field size of viewing. The results show the speed of moving and side walk object don’t affect the perception of viewing angle, but the field size of viewing (Y-axis direction) do. Otherwise, the speed of motion, side walk object, and view area size is nothing to do with the viewing angle perception of female testers, but male testers are influenced by the size of view area. This study also observes 33% testers intend to align the width of road to the width of view area (X-axis direction), most of them are male (90%). Besides, the factor that a man who favors the racing video game or not doesn’t make any difference to the viewing angle perception. Keywords: Video game, Racing Video game, view angle iii 目錄 摘要................................................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • D3.5 Game Design Document
    Grant Agreement No. 687676 Innovation Action ICT-20-2015 D3.5 Game Design Document Due date Month 12 Actual date Month 12 Deliverable author(s) Laurent Auneau Partner(s) Succubus Interactive Version 1.0 Status Draft Dissemination level Public Project Coordinator Coventry University Sylvester Arnab Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK E-mail: [email protected] Project website: http://www.beaconing.eu This project has received funding under the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union – Grant Agreement No. 687676 D3.5 Game Design Document Version control Version Date Author Institution Change and where applicable reason for change 0.1 12/12/16 Laurent Auneau Succubus 0.4 13/12/16 Laurent Auneau Succubus Merged Geomotion’s review 0.5 22/12/16 Laurent Auneau Succubus Merged Imaginary’s review 1.0 30/12/16 Laurent Auneau Succubus Merged Sebit’s review 1.1 31/12/16 Jayne Beaufoy COVUNI Language check and Abrv. table Quality control QA Date QA Responsible Institution Change and where applicable Version reason for change 0.5_Sebit 23/12/2016 A.M. Turker SEBIT See track changes 1.1 31/12/2016 Ioana Stefan, Antoniu ATS See track changes Stefan Release approval Version Date Name Institution Role 1.1 31/12/2016 Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge BIBA QM Statement of originality This deliverable contains original unpublished work except where clearly indicated otherwise. Acknowledgement of previously published material and of the work of others has been made through appropriate citation, quotation or both. BEACONING Page 2 of 22 D3.5 Game Design Document TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 68: Computer Game Design
    Unit 68: Computer Game Design Unit code: H/502/5671 QCF Level 3: BTEC National Credit value: 10 Guided learning hours: 60 Aim and purpose The aim of this unit is to provide learners with an understanding of the underlying principles of game design. Learners will examine visual style and gameplay present in games by undertaking structured gameplay. They will generate game design ideas and learn about and prepare initial formal documentation to communicate these ideas. Unit introduction Game design is about daydreams. But these dreams must be communicated to team members, managers and financial backers. They must then be developed and documented for others to implement and this is a matter of engaging with some challenging realities. Consideration has to be given to identifying those unique features that will make them into playable top titles. All ideas must be recorded to provide a starting point and a reference against which entrepreneurs can make judgements on the risk involved in investing in the development of the game. The unit aims to provide learners with an understanding of the underlying principles of game design that define the way that games work. Learners must appreciate these key game attributes before applying them to their own game ideas. Ideas generation is a very necessary component of the initial development of every game. Having achieved the unit learners will be able to make decisions about potential audiences and identify potential ideas sources. They will have an opportunity to practise methods to stimulate and capture imaginings, and compare their ideas with existing titles. Using more formal documentation, game studios record and communicate the concepts they hope to develop.
    [Show full text]
  • Nearfinalfinal
    Wednesday, 30th of October Opening Ceremony - Damir Durovic (ReBoot), Patrice Desiléts (Panache Digital Games) 10:00-11:00 Goichi Suda, Grasshopper Manufacture - Morning Talk with SUDA 51 11:00 - 11:30 Coffee Breaks MADHEAD GAMES STAGE AMD STAGE KHRONOS GROUP STAGE OCULUS STAGE BIG BLUE BUBBLE STAGE ZEUZ STAGE Rand Miller, Hannah Gamiel, Jon Goldman, Greycroft / Hendrik Lesser, rc productions Benjamin Mitchell, Samsung Chris Jurney, Oculus Matt Turner, EA Cyan Skybound The Character of Play - Emotional 11:30-12:30 Principles to run game 30 Years in the Making: The MoBilising Call of Duty: Bringing a character moments through companies - survival, VR Business Best Practices Session TBA Indie Evolution of Cyan BlockBuster title to Android cinematic storytelling and game sustainaBility and success mechanics Patrice Desiléts, Panache Graham McAllister, Tom Ohle, Evolve PR Nuno Subtil, Nvidia Matt Conte, Oculus Damir Slogar, Big Blue Bubble Digital Games Independent 12:30-13:30 Stop Making Sense - Evolution and SYNC: A Practical System for The Courage to Be Different: The Evolution of PR - Adapt or Bringing Ray Tracing to Vulkan SESSION TBA the changes in the direction of Defining the Player Experience Ancestors Post-Mortem Die independent studios and Creating Successful Teams 13:30 - 15:00 Lunch Break Dough North Cook (Chatham Tom Ohle, Ante Vrdelja, Dan Raphael Van Lierop, University), Hannah Gamiel PANEL: Future of UX Aleksander Kauch, 11 bit studios Anna Carolin Weber, Independent Pearson, moderated by Matt Hinterland (Cyan), Alex SchWartz
    [Show full text]
  • Game Design and Software Specifications and Architecture (Public Summary)
    D 3.1 – Game Design and Software Specifications and Architecture (public summary) Document number D3.1 Document title Game Design and Software Specifications and Architecture (public summary) Version 1.5 Status Final Work package WP 3 Deliverable type Report Contractual date of delivery 01/02/2016 Actual date of delivery 04/03/2016 Author FRE Contributors UOP, ISEP Keyword list Game design and specifications, serious game Dissemination level PU Game Design Document Dissemination Level: PU Amendment history Version Date Author (unit) Description V1 29/01/2016 FRE First draft V2 09/02/2016 UOP First review V3 19/02/2016 FRE Second draft V4 04/03/2016 ISEP Second Review V5 04/03/2016 FRE Third draft (PU) This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 649673. Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for the content of this material lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the views of the European Union, and neither EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any use of this material. EnerGAware - 649673 Version 1.5 Page 2 of 47 Game Design Document Dissemination Level: PU Executive summary Deliverable D3.1 presents the results of the task T3.1 (Serious game design) and T3.2 (software specifications and architecture). It first presents the serious game design in the form of the Game Design Document, a standard document used in the video games development industry presenting the guidelines to create the game envisioned. It describes precisely the content of the game in terms of game concepts, settings, interfaces, graphic, audio and sound design, game modes, assets, interactions, game mechanics, characters, missions, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Template for a Game Design Document (GDD)
    Mansion of Doom GDD V1.0 This is a template for a Game Design Document (GDD). As it’s a template there are many elements that may not apply to your game, (if it’s a fighting game or a puzzle- focused game). This is a starting point based on the games I’ve talked about in the book. This document is a ‘scope’ document, it outlines the main areas of the game and what making the game will entail for the developers. It’s a blueprint for the game and will adapt and change over time (“we can’t get the cooperative component to work right, let’s drop that in favor of a more solid one-player experience” etc.) There is no perfect GDD or Design document, as long as all the stakeholders (those involved in the design, publication and promotion of the game) can make sense of it and use it to understand their workload and who’s doing what, that’s good enough. Game Design Document: Cover: Logo/Image. As with the Design Document Example. Always good to have some exciting cover art. Title: Awesome Name Here (check the name or a similar one is not already in use). Version: (your team needs to know if the document has been updated and that they’re looking at the most up-to-date copy). Written By and Contact Details: who is the document’s author (Art director? Producer? ) Header/Footer; each page should have the game title at the top and a version number. The footer should contain copyright information, page numbering and a date.
    [Show full text]