DOCSLIB.ORG

Game Design and Software Specifications and Architecture (Public Summary)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Game Design and Software Specifications and Architecture (Public Summary) D 3.1 – Game Design and Software Specifications and Architecture (public summary) Document number D3.1 Document title Game Design and Software Specifications and Architecture (public summary) Version 1.5 Status Final Work package WP 3 Deliverable type Report Contractual date of delivery 01/02/2016 Actual date of delivery 04/03/2016 Author FRE Contributors UOP, ISEP Keyword list Game design and specifications, serious game Dissemination level PU Game Design Document Dissemination Level: PU Amendment history Version Date Author (unit) Description V1 29/01/2016 FRE First draft V2 09/02/2016 UOP First review V3 19/02/2016 FRE Second draft V4 04/03/2016 ISEP Second Review V5 04/03/2016 FRE Third draft (PU) This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 649673. Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for the content of this material lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the views of the European Union, and neither EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any use of this material. EnerGAware - 649673 Version 1.5 Page 2 of 47 Game Design Document Dissemination Level: PU Executive summary Deliverable D3.1 presents the results of the task T3.1 (Serious game design) and T3.2 (software specifications and architecture). It first presents the serious game design in the form of the Game Design Document, a standard document used in the video games development industry presenting the guidelines to create the game envisioned. It describes precisely the content of the game in terms of game concepts, settings, interfaces, graphic, audio and sound design, game modes, assets, interactions, game mechanics, characters, missions, etc. The deliverable then presents the artistic direction, describing the visual ideas thought for the EnerGAware serious game. The EnerGAware serious game artistic direction focuses on: the house concepts, as the house is at the centre of the gameplay; the evolution of the house, because it is a customisation game; and the integration to a real environment, because the game must relate to the everyday life of the players as previous works have concluded. The last part provides ideas and concept art around the main character of the game, the cat. The last part of the D3.1 document is dedicated to the software specifications and architecture of the EnerGAware serious game. It provides all the relevant details to produce the EnerGAware from a software and server architecture point of view. The part relative to the game and game server is managed by FremenCorp and the part relative to the house server, by ISEP. EnerGAware - 649673 Version 1.5 Page 3 of 47 Game Design Document Dissemination Level: PU Table of contents 1 GAME DESIGN DOCUMENT ................................................................................................................ 11 1.1 THE MAIN IDEA ........................................................................................................................................... 11 1.1.1 Story: the smart cat, king of the house ................................................................................. 11 1.1.2 Game systems .......................................................................................................................... 11 1.1.3 The main game mechanics ................................................................................................... 12 1.1.4 The main gameplay loop ....................................................................................................... 13 1.1.5 Balance between happiness and energy points ................................................................ 15 1.1.6 Social dimension of the EnerGAware serious game ........................................................... 15 1.1.7 Real consumption and game impact .................................................................................. 15 1.1.8 Behaviour change objectives ................................................................................................ 16 1.2 GENERIC GAME SETTINGS ........................................................................................................................... 16 1.2.1 Interface ................................................................................................................................... 17 1.2.2 Language ................................................................................................................................. 17 1.2.3 Difficulty default settings ......................................................................................................... 18 1.2.4 Graphics default settings ........................................................................................................ 18 1.2.5 Controls default settings ......................................................................................................... 18 1.2.6 Music, Sound and FX settings ................................................................................................. 18 1.3 IN-GAME MODE ......................................................................................................................................... 19 1.3.1 Camera: Field of view and Angle ......................................................................................... 19 1.3.2 Controls: Finger(s) touch ......................................................................................................... 20 1.3.3 Messages and pop-up ............................................................................................................ 20 1.4 EDITOR MODE ............................................................................................................................................ 21 1.4.1.1 Items’ information ................................................................................................................................ 21 1.4.1.1.1 Energy points consumption ........................................................................................................... 21 1.4.1.1.2 Happiness ......................................................................................................................................... 22 1.5 RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................................... 22 1.5.1 Energy points ............................................................................................................................ 22 1.5.2 Unlock new items ..................................................................................................................... 22 1.5.3 Money ....................................................................................................................................... 22 1.5.4 Energy points, money, and happiness system ..................................................................... 22 1.6 CHARACTERS ............................................................................................................................................ 23 EnerGAware - 649673 Version 1.5 Page 4 of 47 Game Design Document Dissemination Level: PU 1.6.1 Cat ............................................................................................................................................. 23 1.6.2 Humans ..................................................................................................................................... 23 1.6.3 Neighbours ............................................................................................................................... 23 1.7 SYSTEM INFORMATION ................................................................................................................................ 24 1.7.1 Loading system ........................................................................................................................ 24 1.8 MISSIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 25 1.8.1 Global system ........................................................................................................................... 25 1.8.1.1 Triggers ................................................................................................................................................... 25 1.8.1.2 Interface ................................................................................................................................................ 25 1.9 TIME IN GAME ............................................................................................................................................ 26 1.9.1 Real calendar events .............................................................................................................. 26 1.9.2 Day and night cycle ............................................................................................................... 26 1.9.3 Seasons: in-game effects ....................................................................................................... 27 1.10 SPECIAL EVENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 27 1.11 ONLINE AND OFFLINE ............................................................................................................................ 27 2 ARTISTIC DIRECTION
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Game Level Layout from Design Specification
    EUROGRAPHICS 2014 / B. Lévy and J. Kautz Volume 33 (2014), Number 2 (Guest Editors) Game Level Layout from Design Specification Chongyang Ma∗z Nicholas Vining∗ Sylvain Lefebvrey Alla Sheffer∗ ∗ University of British Columbia y ALICE/INRIA z University of Southern California Abstract The design of video game environments, or levels, aims to control gameplay by steering the player through a sequence of designer-controlled steps, while simultaneously providing a visually engaging experience. Traditionally these levels are painstakingly designed by hand, often from pre-existing building blocks, or space templates. In this paper, we propose an algorithmic approach for automatically laying out game levels from user-specified blocks. Our method allows designers to retain control of the gameplay flow via user-specified level connectivity graphs, while relieving them from the tedious task of manually assembling the building blocks into a valid, plausible layout. Our method produces sequences of diverse layouts for the same input connectivity, allowing for repeated replay of a given level within a visually different, new environment. We support complex graph connectivities and various building block shapes, and are able to compute complex layouts in seconds. The two key components of our algorithm are the use of configuration spaces defining feasible relative positions of building blocks within a layout and a graph-decomposition based layout strategy that leverages graph connectivity to speed up convergence and avoid local minima. Together these two tools quickly steer the solution toward feasible layouts. We demonstrate our method on a variety of real-life inputs, and generate appealing layouts conforming to user specifications. Categories and Subject Descriptors (according to ACM CCS): I.3.5 [Computer Graphics]: Computational Geometry and Object Modeling—Curve, surface, solid, and object representations 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing the Game Design Matrix: a Step-By-Step Process for Creating Serious Games
    Air Force Institute of Technology AFIT Scholar Theses and Dissertations Student Graduate Works 3-2020 Introducing the Game Design Matrix: A Step-by-Step Process for Creating Serious Games Aaron J. Pendleton Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.afit.edu/etd Part of the Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Game Design Commons, and the Instructional Media Design Commons Recommended Citation Pendleton, Aaron J., "Introducing the Game Design Matrix: A Step-by-Step Process for Creating Serious Games" (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 4347. https://scholar.afit.edu/etd/4347 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Graduate Works at AFIT Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of AFIT Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCING THE GAME DESIGN MATRIX: A STEP-BY-STEP PROCESS FOR CREATING SERIOUS GAMES THESIS Aaron J. Pendleton, Captain, USAF AFIT-ENG-MS-20-M-054 DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT A APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED. The views expressed in this document are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, the United States Department of Defense or the United States Government. This material is declared a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. AFIT-ENG-MS-20-M-054 INTRODUCING THE GAME DESIGN MATRIX: A STEP-BY-STEP PROCESS FOR CREATING LEARNING OBJECTIVE BASED SERIOUS GAMES THESIS Presented to the Faculty Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Graduate School of Engineering and Management Air Force Institute of Technology Air University Air Education and Training Command in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Cyberspace Operations Aaron J.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Affective Games with Physiological Input Lennart E
    Designing Affective Games with Physiological Input Lennart E. Nacke Regan L. Mandryk University of Saskatchewan University of Saskatchewan 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK 110 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK Canada Canada [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT information about user emotion [1] and/or cognition [6]) are With the advent of new game controllers, traditional input becoming more popular in desktop software design as well mechanisms for games have changed to include gestural [2]. For human-computer interaction evaluative studies, this interfaces and camera recognition techniques, which are marks a shift from analyses centering on usability to those being further explored with the likes of Sony’s PlayStation that are looking at the full spectrum of user experience Move and Microsoft’s Kinect. Soon these techniques will (UX). These studies focus on human aspects of interaction, include affective input to control game interaction and such as the behavioral, perceptual, emotional, and cognitive mechanics. Thus, it is important to explore which game capabilities of people [5]. designs work best with which affective input technologies, giving special regard to direct and indirect methods. In this In addition to evaluating affective user responses, the use of paper, we discuss some affective measurement techniques a player’s own cognitive and emotional state as input – and development ideas for using these as control known as affective input – is an exciting input possibility mechanisms for affective game design using that has not been fully explored in the context of games [4]. psychophysiological input. Affective input has seen use as a direct method of control in accessibility applications, and as an indirect method of Author Keywords control in biofeedback training for meditation and phobia Affective computing, entertainment computing, treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Game Design Involving Online Tools
    Analyzing a Process of Collaborative Game Design Involving Online Tools Sandra B. Fan1, Brian R. Johnson2, Yun-En Liu1, Tyler S. Robison1, Rolfe R. Schmidt1, Steven L. Tanimoto1 1. Department of Computer Science and Engineering 2. Department of Architecture University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 1: {sbfan, yunliu, trobison, rolfe, tanimoto}@cs.uw.edu; 2: [email protected] Abstract collaboration tools for problem solving across a range of disciplines. In particular, we take a state-space- In this study, we explore how problem solving and search approach to modeling the design process, based design can be modeled using state-space-search on the classical AI theory of problem solving. methodology, by engaging in the design of two During each design exercise, we utilized different educational games. Additionally, we wanted to online collaboration tools: our own INFACT system, discover how online communication tools could be Google Wave beta, as well as our CoSolve used to support collaborative design. We used three environment for modeling state-space problem solving, online tools: 1) CoSolve, a collaborative problem- and we developed two games: Go Atom, a chemistry solving environment that we developed, 2) Google game, and Eco-avelli, a climate change game. Wave, a wiki/chat hybrid communication tool, and 3) In Section 2, we will describe the existing INFACT, a discussion forum that we built for use in technologies and the state-space-search design education. We used these tools to design Go Atom, a methodology in more detail. In Sections 3, 4 & 5, we chemistry game, and Eco-avelli, a game that intended will describe our specific design process of creating to demonstrate the politics of climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Architecture in Constructing Gameworlds
    Document generated on 09/25/2021 8:46 p.m. Loading The Journal of the Canadian Game Studies Association The Role of Architecture in Constructing Gameworlds: Intertextual Allusions, Metaphorical Representations and Societal Ethics in Dishonored Anthony Zonaga and Marcus Carter Volume 12, Number 20, Fall 2019 Article abstract In this article, we present a close analysis of the role that the steampunk URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1065898ar industrial Victorian architecture in Dishonored (2012) has in constructing the DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1065898ar player’s experience and knowledge of the gameworld. Through various intertextual allusions and metaphorical representations, we argue the See table of contents architecture works as an important storytelling element, contextualizing information that the player learns and conveying information about the game’s main characters, similar to the ways that architecture is utilized in Publisher(s) other visual media such as television and film. In addition, we also argue that the architecture in Dishonored plays a crucial role in conveying to the player Canadian Game Studies Association information about the morals and values of the fictional society, key to the game’s moral-choice gameplay. ISSN 1923-2691 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Zonaga, A. & Carter, M. (2019). The Role of Architecture in Constructing Gameworlds: Intertextual Allusions, Metaphorical Representations and Societal Ethics in Dishonored. Loading, 12(20), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.7202/1065898ar Copyright, 2019 Anthony Zonaga, Marcus Carter This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online.
    [Show full text]
  • Design Methods for Democratising Mobile Game Design
    Design Methods for Democratising Mobile Game Design Mark J. Nelson Abstract Swen E. Gaudl Playing mobile games is popular among a large and Simon Colton diverse set of players, contrasting sharply with the lim- Rob Saunders ited set of companies and people who design them. We Edward J. Powley would like to democratise mobile game design by ena- Peter Ivey bling players to design games on the same devices they Blanca Pérez Ferrer play them on, without needing to program. Our concept Michael Cook of fluidic games aims to realise this vision by drawing on three design methodologies. The interaction style of The MetaMakers Institute fluidic games is that of casual creators; their end-user Falmouth University design philosophy is adapted from metadesign; and Cornwall, UK their technical implementation is based on parametric metamakersinstitute.com design. In this short article, we discuss how we’ve adapted these three methods to mobile game design, and some open questions that remain in order to em- power end user game design on mobile phones in a way that rises beyond the level of typical user- generated content. Author Keywords Mobile games; casual creators; metadesign; parametric design; end-user creativity; mixed-initiative interfaces. ACM Classification Keywords H.5.m. Information interfaces and presentation: Miscel- laneous Introduction Fluidic Games Our starting point is the observation that mobile games To support on-device casual design, we are developing have attracted a large and diverse set of players, but a what we call fluidic games [5-7]. These blur the line smaller and less diverse set of designers.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Game Development Program Brochure
    School of Game Development STEM certified school academyart.edu SCHOOL OF GAME DEVELOPMENT Contents Program Overview .................................................. 5 What We Teach ......................................................... 7 The School of Game Development Difference ....... 9 Faculty .................................................................... 11 Degree Options ...................................................... 13 Our Facilities ........................................................... 15 Student & Alumni Testimonials ............................ 17 Partnerships .......................................................... 19 Career Paths .......................................................... 21 Additional Learning Experiences ......................... 23 Awards and Accolades ......................................... 25 Online Education .................................................. 27 Academy Life ........................................................ 29 San Francisco ........................................................ 31 Athletics ................................................................ 33 Apply Today .......................................................... 35 3 SCHOOL OF GAME DEVELOPMENT Program Overview We offer two degree tracks—Game Development and Game Programming. Pursue your love for both the art and science of games at the School of Game Development. OUR MISSION WHAT SETS US APART Don’t let the word “game” fool you. The gaming • Learn both the art, (Game Development) and
    [Show full text]
  • Creativity Training Model for Game Design
    (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2021 Creativity Training Model for Game Design Raudyah Md Tap1, Nor Azan Mat Zin2, Hafiz Mohd Sarim3, Norizan Mat Diah4 Faculty of Information Science and Technology, The National University of Malaysia, 43600 Bangi, Malaysia1, 2, 3 Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia4 Abstract—The popularity of digital games is increasing with a efficient, beneficial, and of quality [3] [4] [5]. Regardless of global market value of RM197.6 billion. However, the game the purpose of the computer games, the fundamental emphasis produced locally still has no impact. One reason is that there is should be on the game design and the design process's creative no emphasis on the game design process in the game development aspect. education program. Games designed have a problem in terms of creativity, and there is still no specific method of training The game design process plays a crucial role in producing creative thinking. This study aims to identify and validate game a good and creative game. According to [6], the process of design's creativity components and develop a Creativity Training game design is divided into two main phases that need to be Model for Game Design (LK2RBPD Model) verified through the emphasized, namely ideation and conceptualization. Ideation Game Design Document Tool (GDD Tool) prototype. This refers to the process of generating creative and innovative research has four main phases: the requirements planning, game design ideas, while conceptualization is to outline the design, development, implementation, and testing phases.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Game Design Tool: State Explorer
    Practical Game Design Tool: State Explorer Rokas Volkovas Michael Fairbank John R. Woodward Simon Lucas QMUL University of Essex QMUL QMUL London, UK Colchester, UK London, UK London, UK [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—This paper introduces a computer-game design tool B. Problem Scope which enables game designers to explore and develop game mechanics for arbitrary game systems. The tool is implemented To approach solving the problem of shortening the iteration as a plugin for the Godot game engine. It allows the designer to cycle of designing and building systems for games, we first view an abstraction of a game’s states while in active development narrow down its domain and define the scope of the problem and to quickly view and explore which states are navigable from in question. which other states. This information is used to rapidly explore, Our idealized set of features to address the problem of slow validate and improve the design of the game. The tool is most practical for game systems which are computer-explorable within video-game design iteration speed were identified. Conceptu- roughly 2000 states. The tool is demonstrated by presenting how ally, these were the ability to: it was used to create a small, yet complete, commercial game. • navigate game states manually • navigate game states automatically I. INTRODUCTION • to identify states of interest A. Video Game Design is Tedious • examine the explored states At their very core, games are systems built for human Given a tool with these features, a video game designer can interaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing Gameplay Researching and Testing Nintendo’S Game Design
    Designing Gameplay Researching and testing Nintendo’s game design Malin Ribäck Arcada Biblioteket och Språkenheten Helsingfors 2019 EXAMENSARBETE Arcada Utbildningsprogram: Mediekultur Identifikationsnummer: 6847 Författare: Malin Ribäck Arbetets namn: Gameplays design – Undersökning och test av Nintendos speldesign Handledare (Arcada): Mirko Ahonen Uppdragsgivare: Sammandrag: Studien gick ut på att utforska hur spelföretaget Nintendo designar gameplay. För att testa resultaten i praktiken skapades ett game design-dokument. Därför börjar arbetet med att diskutera vad game design-dokument är och vad de används för. Game design-dokumentet som gjordes i samband med studien är en kombination av det huvudsakliga game design- dokumentet och ett konceptdokument. Därför tar arbetet också upp skillnaderna mellan dessa dokument. För att utreda hur Nintendo designar gameplay utfördes en litteraturundersökning. Materialet som användes i litteraturundersökningen består av intervjuer. Majoriteten av intervjuerna härstammar från Nintendos egen hemsida. För att utforma en teori tar arbetet upp några befintliga teorier för hur Nintendo designar sina spel. För att kunna diskutera Nintendos gameplay definieras gameplays koncept genom att diskutera olika definitioner av olika författare som tar upp ämnet i fråga. Litteraturundersökningen inleds med en presentation av varifrån materialet för studien har kommit. Inledningsvis tar också arbetet upp två viktiga spelutvecklare från Nintendo, för att ge insikt i varför just de personerna är viktiga. För att presentera en helhet över hur Nintendo designar gameplay studeras, organiseras, presenteras och diskuteras innehållet från litteraturundersökningen. Resultatet från undersökningen visar bland annat att när Nintendo designar sina spel, fokuserar man på följande saker: Att göra spelen användarvänliga, att formge dem enligt deras funktion, att göra spelvärlden responsiv i förhållande till spelaren och att undvika störa eller avbryta spelarens inlevelse i spelet.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Implementation of a Single-Player First-Person Shooter Game Using XNA Game Development Studio
    Final Report Design and implementation of a single-player first-person shooter game using XNA game development studio Master of Science Thesis in the Department of Computer Science and Engineering Hatice Ezgi TUGLU Kahraman AKYIL Chalmers University of Technology Department of Computer Science and Engineering Göteborg, Sweden, 2010 The Author grants to Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg the non-exclusive right to publish the Work electronically and in a non-commercial purpose make it accessible on the Internet. The Author warrants that he/she is the author to the Work, and warrants that the Work does not contain text, pictures or other material that violates copyright law. The Author shall, when transferring the rights of the Work to a third party (for example a publisher or a company), acknowledge the third party about this agreement. If the Author has signed a copyright agreement with a third party regarding the Work, the Author warrants hereby that he/she has obtained any necessary permission from this third party to let Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg store the Work electronically and make it accessible on the Internet. Design and implementation of a single-player first-person shooter game using XNA game development studio Hatice Ezgi TUGLU Kahraman AKYIL © Hatice Ezgi TUGLU, October 2010. © Kahraman AKYIL, October 2010. Examiner: Per ZARING Chalmers University of Technology University of Gothenburg Department of Computer Science and Engineering SE-412 96 Göteborg Sweden Telephone + 46 (0)31-772 1000 Department of Computer Science and Engineering Göteborg, Sweden October 2010 1 | P a g e HUMANKILLERS Will you keep your promise? 2 | P a g e Abstract “Humankillers” is a name of the game that was developed for Master Thesis in Computer Science Department at Chalmers University of Technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Scaling the Level of Difficulty in Single Player Video Games
    Scaling the Level of Difficulty in Single Player Video Games Maria-Virginia Aponte, Guillaume Levieux, and St´ephane Natkin Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches en Informatique du CNAM Conservatoire National des Arts et M´etiers, Paris, France [email protected] Abstract. In this this paper, we discuss the interest and the need to evaluate the difficulty of single player video games. We first show the importance of difficulty, drawing from semiotics to explain the link be- tween tension-resolution cycles, and challenge with the player’s enjoy- ment. Then, we report related work on automatic gameplay analysis. We show through a simple experimentation that automatic video game analysis is both practicable and can lead to interesting results. We argue that automatic analysis tools are limited if they do not consider diffi- culty from the player point of view. The last section provides a player and Game Design oriented definition of the challenge and difficulty no- tions in games. As a consequence we derive the property that must fulfill a measurable definition of difficulty. Keywords : video games, challenge, difficulty, learning, evaluation. 1 Introduction One of the fundamental issues to tackle in the design of video games is mostly referred as creating a well-shaped difficulty curve. This means that one of the core element of a good game design is to make the game just as difficult as it has to be, so that the player feels challenged enough, but not too much. However, game creators cannot rely on strong tools to help them in this task, and there is not even a clear and accepted definition of difficulty as a measurable parameter.
    [Show full text]