DOCSLIB.ORG

The London School of Economics and Political Science the New

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The London School of Economics and Political Science the New The London School of Economics and Political Science The New Industrial Order: Vichy, Steel, and the Origins of the Monnet Plan, 1940-1946 Luc-André Brunet A thesis submitted to the Department of International History of the London School of Economics for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, London, July 2014 1 Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the MPhil/PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 87,402 words. 2 Abstract Following the Fall of France in 1940, the nation’s industry was fundamentally reorganised under the Vichy regime. This thesis traces the history of the keystones of this New Industrial Order, the Organisation Committees, by focusing on the organisation of the French steel industry between the end of the Third Republic in 1940 and the establishment of the Fourth Republic in 1946. It challenges traditional views by showing that the Committees were created largely to facilitate economic collaboration with Nazi Germany. It also demonstrates that these institutions were run by a new group of technocratic managers from French industry and that they willingly oversaw production for the Third Reich insofar as it remained advantageous to French steel firms. By extending the period of study beyond the end of the Vichy regime, this thesis casts light on why the leaders of the Resistance decided to maintain these problematic institutions and provides the first detailed account of how the bodies were reformed following the Liberation of France. Finally, it reveals that although the Organisation Committees were formally abolished in 1946, Jean Monnet created parallel bodies, named Modernisation Commissions, which took over the functions and carried on the work of Vichy’s Committees under the auspices of the Monnet Plan. By demonstrating the continuities of institutions and individuals in French industrial organisation from 1940 to 1946, or l’entre-deux-républiques, this thesis contributes to the history of Vichy and post-war France and re-evaluates the origins of the Monnet Plan and of the European Coal and Steel Community, the forerunner to today’s European Union. 3 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 7 Abbreviations 9 Introduction 11 Chapter One: France’s New Industrial Order: Reordering Industrial Production after France’s Capitulation, Summer 1940 28 The law of 16 August 1940 34 Understanding the law of 16 August 1940 36 The prehistory of the Organisation Committees, June-August 1940 43 Meanwhile back in Vichy 47 A Franco-German Europe? 49 Conclusion 56 Chapter Two: ‘Twixt the Cup and the Lip: Building the New Industrial Order, 1940- 1941 57 Industrial organisation under Vichy: “acte révolutionnaire” or “pure façade”? 58 The creation of CORSID: stillborn tripartism? 60 “Action, dynamism, authority”: the new men for the New Industrial Order 65 First actions of CORSID 71 German authorities and French steel 75 Wagging the French dog 76 Conclusion 79 4 Chapter Three: Fuelling the German War Economy, 1941-1944 81 The National Revolution and the Labour Charter 82 Working in the Reich 90 Franco-German integration under Speer and Bichelonne 97 Harmonising Franco-German industry 101 Economic collaboration in the French steel industry 105 Conclusion 114 Chapter Four: «Nous serons les successeurs, sinon les héritiers de Vichy»: Maintaining the New Industrial Order in Post-Vichy France 116 Post-war programmes, Organisation Committees, and the division of the French left 117 The long shadow of Vichy 121 The first death of the New Industrial Order? 128 Debating the New Industrial Order: “suppression ou transition?” 130 Conclusion 138 Chapter Five: Conserver la forme en réformant l’esprit: Reforming Vichy’s New Industrial Order, 1944-1946 140 A Newer Industrial Order? 142 By any other name: unveiling the Professional Offices 144 Reforming Vichy’s Committees 145 From dictatorship to triumvirate 152 From autarky to planned production 155 Consolidating Vichy’s Committees 157 Returning to first principles: applying Vichy’s laws in post-war France 159 5 Conclusion 163 Chapter Six: From Organisation Committees to Modernisation Commissions, 1946 166 Who lost the Ministry for Industrial Production? 167 The conversions of Paul: nationalising French industry 169 The end of the New Industrial Order? 173 The Monnet Plan 177 Building the Commissariat général du Plan 179 Institutional metempsychosis: from Committees to Commissions 185 Conclusion 194 Conclusions 196 The New Industrial Order: a summing up 197 A pragmatic and provisional age 199 Epilogue: d’une Europe l’autre 202 Bibliography 208 6 Acknowledgements I have been fortunate enough to have received excellent academic guidance over the course of my doctoral studies. First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Piers Ludlow. I am indebted to him for his invaluable support throughout my time at LSE, his incisive feedback, and his judicious advice. I feel privileged to have had him as my supervisor. I am also grateful to Alan Sked, who very kindly took me on as a PhD student and acted as supervisor for the first stages of my doctorate, helping me to adapt to the UK higher education system after my experiences in Canadian, French, and Belgian universities. Third, I would like to thank Claire Andrieu who acted as supervisor during my time as chercheur invité at the Centre d’Histoire de Sciences Po in Paris. Her expertise on precisely the issues I was interested in researching challenged my working hypotheses and forced me to strengthen my arguments. Over the past years, I have also received helpful academic guidance from Antony Best, Robert Boyce, Eric Bussière, Dominic Lieven, Erica Wald, Laurent Warlouzet, and Vladislav Zubok. I would also like to thank Eirini Karamouzi for her tireless support and invaluable guidance, particularly in the later stages of this thesis. I am especially grateful to LSE IDEAS, particularly Arne Westad, Svetozar Rajak, and Nigel Ashton, for awarding me the Pinto Post-Doctoral Fellowship for 2014-2015. My work at LSE IDEAS since 2012 with both the Cold War Studies Programme and the journal Cold War History has been an enriching experience that has informed my own research. I am thankful to Emilia Knight and everyone at IDEAS for their unwavering encouragement and accommodation and for constituting such a warm and supportive work environment. Daniel Strieff, in particular, generously took on extra work when I had to absent myself during the final stages of my thesis, for which he has my deep gratitude. I would also like to thank the LSE International History Department for providing such a stimulating and supportive environment and for allowing me to teach and organise a number of courses. My time as a PhD student has been facilitated by the support of a number of funding bodies. The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada awarded me a Doctoral Fellowship for the duration of my studies and covered my tuition fees as an overseas student. Academic Partnerships at LSE granted me a PhD Mobility Bursary to spend several months at Sciences Po which enabled me to complete a significant amount of archival research in Paris. The Economic History Society Research Grant allowed me to 7 undertake archival work in Roubaix, while the International History Department at LSE provided me with Travel Research Grants which facilitated a number of archival trips over the years. When conducting research, I have benefitted from the kind help of a number of archivists. I am grateful to Régis Clavé at the Fondation Jean Monnet pour l’Europe in Lausanne, Virginie Hébrard at the Institut d’Histoire Sociale in Paris, Valérie Hugonnard at the Institut d’Histoire du Temps Présent in Paris, Andrea Maier at the Bundesarchiv- Militärarchiv in Freiburg, and Gersande Piernas at the Centre d’Archives du Monde du Travail in Roubaix. Finally, I must thank three people. First, my parents, who have been tremendously supportive throughout my academic career, offering steadfast encouragement and tirelessly reading drafts of my work. To them this thesis is dedicated. Finally, I am grateful to Rebecca for so many reasons, not least her inestimable support and encouragement throughout the writing of this thesis. 8 Abbreviations AN Archives nationales, Paris/Pierrefitte-sur-Seine ANMT Archives nationales du monde du travail, Roubaix BA-MA Bundesarchiv-Militärarchiv, Freiburg im Breisgau BNS Bureau de normalisation de la sidérurgie CAEF Centre des archives économiques et financières, Savigny-le-Temple CFLN Comité français de Libération nationale CFTC Confédération française des travailleurs chrétiens CGP Commissariat général du Plan CGPF Confédération générale du patronat français CGT Confédération générale du travail CGTU Confédération générale du travail unitaire CNPF Conseil national du patronat français CNR Conseil national de la Résistance CO Comité d’organisation COA Comité d’organisation de l’automobile et du cycle COH Comité d’organisation de l’industrie des combustibles
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Big Tech Dominance (1): the New Financial Tycoons
    Paul-Adrien HYPPOLITE Antoine MICHON BIG TECH DOMINANCE (1): THE NEW FINANCIAL TYCOONS December 2018 fondapol.org 2 BIG TECH DOMINANCE (1): THE NEW FINANCIAL TYCOONS Paul-Adrien HYPPOLITE Antoine MICHON 3 The Fondation pour l’innovation politique is a French think tank for European integration and free economy. Chair: Nicolas Bazire Vice-chair: Grégoire Chertok Executive Director: Dominique Reynié Chair of Scientific and Evaluation Board: Christophe de Voogd 4 FONDATION POUR L’INNOVATION POLITIQUE A French think tank for European integration and free economy The Fondation pour l’innovation politique provides an independent forum for expertise, opinion and exchange aimed at producing and disseminating ideas and proposals. It contributes to pluralism of thought and the renewal of public discussion from a free market, forward-thinking and European perspective. Four main priorities guide the Foundation’s work: economic growth, the environment, values and digital technology. The website www.fondapol.org provides public access to all the Foundation’s work. Anyone can access and use all the data gathered for the various surveys via the platform “Data.fondapol” and the data relating to international surveys is available in several languages. In addition, our blog “Trop Libre” (Too Free) casts a critical eye over the news and the world of ideas. “Trop Libre” also provides extensive monitoring of the effects of the digital revolution on political, economic and social practices in its “Renaissance numérique” (Digital Renaissance) section. Additionally, reflecting the Foundation’s editorial policy, our blog “Anthropotechnie” aims to explore new avenues prompted by human enhancement, reproductive cloning, human/machine hybridization, genetic engineering and germline manipulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution, Not Revolution: the Effect of New Deal Legislation On
    EVOLUTION, NOT REVOLUTION: THE EFFECT OF NEW DEAL LEGISLATION ON INDUSTRIAL GROWTH AND UNION DEVELOPMENT IN DALLAS, TEXAS M. Courtney Welch, B.S.E., M.A., Ed.D. Dissertation Prepared for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS August 2010 APPROVED: Richard McCaslin, Major Professor and Chair of the Department of History Randolph Campbell, Committee Member John Todd, Committee Member Aaron Navarro, Committee Member Elizabeth Turner, Committee Member James D. Meernik, Acting Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Welch, M. Courtney. Evolution, Not Revolution: The Effect of New Deal Legislation on Industrial Growth and Union Development in Dallas, Texas. Doctor of Philosophy (History), August 2010, 226 pp., 9 tables, 11 illustrations, references, 145 titles. The New Deal legislation of the 1930s would threaten Dallas’ peaceful industrial appearance. In fact, New Deal programs and legislation did have an effect on the city, albeit an unbalanced mixture of positive and negative outcomes characterized by frustrated workers and industrial intimidation. To summarize, the New Deal did not bring a revolution, but it did continue an evolutionary change for reform. This dissertation investigated several issues pertaining to the development of the textile industry, cement industry, and the Ford automobile factory in Dallas and its labor history before, during, and after the New Deal. New Deal legislation not only created an avenue for industrial workers to achieve better representation but also improved their working conditions. Specifically focusing on the textile, cement, and automobile industries illustrates that the development of union representation is a spectrum, with one end being the passive but successful cement industry experience and the other end being the automobile industry union efforts, which were characterized by violence and intimidation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Empire Returns: 'Repatriates' and 'Refugees' from French Algeria
    Eldridge, Claire. "The Empire Returns: ‘Repatriates’ and ‘Refugees’ from French Algeria." Refugees in Europe, 1919–1959: A Forty Years’ Crisis?. By Matthew Frank and Jessica Reinisch. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017. 195–212. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 24 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474295734.0015>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 24 September 2021, 05:54 UTC. Copyright © Matthew Frank, Jessica Reinisch and Contributors 2017. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 1 1 Th e Empire Returns: ‘Repatriates’ and ‘Refugees’ from French Algeria Claire Eldridge From 1954 until 1962, France fought a protracted and brutal colonial war in an attempt to retain control over the territory of Algeria. Th ere were many reasons why France sought to deny the forces of the National Liberation Front (FLN) the independence they were seeking, among them were Algeria’s geographical proximity; its unique status as an integral part of the nation since 1848 rather than just a colony; the importance of a global territorial reach to France’s post-1945 claims to great power status; and the presence of over one million Europeans who regularly and forcefully made clear their ardent wish that Algeria remain part of France. Infamous for the extreme tactics used by both sides, including the systematic use of torture by the French army, this politically destabilizing confl ict brought down the Fourth Republic, occasioned the return to power of General Charles de Gaulle in 1958, and led to the creation of the Fift h Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • DP Musée De La Libération UK.Indd
    PRESS KIT LE MUSÉE DE LA LIBÉRATION DE PARIS MUSÉE DU GÉNÉRAL LECLERC MUSÉE JEAN MOULIN OPENING 25 AUGUST 2019 OPENING 25 AUGUST 2019 LE MUSÉE DE LA LIBÉRATION DE PARIS MUSÉE DU GÉNÉRAL LECLERC MUSÉE JEAN MOULIN The musée de la Libération de Paris – musée-Général Leclerc – musée Jean Moulin will be ofcially opened on 25 August 2019, marking the 75th anniversary of the Liberation of Paris. Entirely restored and newly laid out, the museum in the 14th arrondissement comprises the 18th-century Ledoux pavilions on Place Denfert-Rochereau and the adjacent 19th-century building. The aim is let the general public share three historic aspects of the Second World War: the heroic gures of Philippe Leclerc de Hauteclocque and Jean Moulin, and the liberation of the French capital. 2 Place Denfert-Rochereau, musée de la Libération de Paris – musée-Général Leclerc – musée Jean Moulin © Pierre Antoine CONTENTS INTRODUCTION page 04 EDITORIALS page 05 THE MUSEUM OF TOMORROW: THE CHALLENGES page 06 THE MUSEUM OF TOMORROW: THE CHALLENGES A NEW HISTORICAL PRESENTATION page 07 AN EXHIBITION IN STEPS page 08 JEAN MOULIN (¡¢¢¢£¤) page 11 PHILIPPE DE HAUTECLOCQUE (¢§¢£¨) page 12 SCENOGRAPHY: THE CHOICES page 13 ENHANCED COLLECTIONS page 15 3 DONATIONS page 16 A MUSEUM FOR ALL page 17 A HERITAGE SETTING FOR A NEW MUSEUM page 19 THE INFORMATION CENTRE page 22 THE EXPERT ADVISORY COMMITTEE page 23 PARTNER BODIES page 24 SCHEDULE AND FINANCING OF THE WORKS page 26 SPONSORS page 27 PROJECT PERSONNEL page 28 THE CITY OF PARIS MUSEUM NETWORK page 29 PRESS VISUALS page 30 LE MUSÉE DE LA LIBÉRATION DE PARIS MUSÉE DU GÉNÉRAL LECLERC MUSÉE JEAN MOULIN INTRODUCTION New presentation, new venue: the museums devoted to general Leclerc, the Liberation of Paris and Resistance leader Jean Moulin are leaving the Gare Montparnasse for the Ledoux pavilions on Place Denfert-Rochereau.
    [Show full text]
  • The Two Postwar Eras and the Conditions for Stability in Twentieth-Century Western Europe
    The Two Postwar Eras and the Conditions for Stability in Twentieth-Century Western Europe The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Maier, Charles S. 1981. The two postwar eras and the conditions for stability in twentieth-century Western Europe. American Historical Review 86(2): 327-352. Published Version doi:10.2307/1857441 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4727674 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AHR Forum The Two Postwar Eras and the Conditions for Stability in Twentleth-CenturyWestern Europe CHARLES S. MAIER BROADCASTING over the BBC in November 1945, A. J. P. Taylor assured his lis- teners, "Nobody in Europe believes in the American way of life-that is, in pri- vate enterprise; or rather those who believe in it are a defeated party and a party which seems to have no more future than the Jacobites in England after 1688. "I Taylor proved to be wrong, or at least premature, about the end of pri- vate enterprise. The question here is why, at least in Western Europe, there was less transformation than he envisaged. Posed in broader terms, how did Western Europe achieve political and social stability by the mid-twentieth century after two great, destructive wars and the intervening upheaval. Historians often treat stability as a passive coming to rest or a societal inertia that requires no explanation.
    [Show full text]
  • Luxembourg Resistance to the German Occupation of the Second World War, 1940-1945
    LUXEMBOURG RESISTANCE TO THE GERMAN OCCUPATION OF THE SECOND WORLD WAR, 1940-1945 by Maureen Hubbart A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS Major Subject: History West Texas A&M University Canyon, TX December 2015 ABSTRACT The history of Luxembourg’s resistance against the German occupation of World War II has rarely been addressed in English-language scholarship. Perhaps because of the country’s small size, it is often overlooked in accounts of Western European History. However, Luxembourgers experienced the German occupation in a unique manner, in large part because the Germans considered Luxembourgers to be ethnically and culturally German. The Germans sought to completely Germanize and Nazify the Luxembourg population, giving Luxembourgers many opportunities to resist their oppressors. A study of French, German, and Luxembourgian sources about this topic reveals a people that resisted in active and passive, private and public ways. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Dr. Elizabeth Clark for her guidance in helping me write my thesis and for sharing my passion about the topic of underground resistance. My gratitude also goes to Dr. Brasington for all of his encouragement and his suggestions to improve my writing process. My thanks to the entire faculty in the History Department for their support and encouragement. This thesis is dedicated to my family: Pete and Linda Hubbart who played with and took care of my children for countless hours so that I could finish my degree; my husband who encouraged me and always had a joke ready to help me relax; and my parents and those members of my family living in Europe, whose history kindled my interest in the Luxembourgian resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Vichy France and the Jews
    VICHY FRANCE AND THE JEWS MICHAEL R. MARRUS AND ROBERT 0. PAXTON Originally published as Vichy et les juifs by Calmann-Levy 1981 Basic Books, Inc., Publishers New York Contents Introduction Chapter 1 / First Steps Chapter 2 / The Roots o f Vichy Antisemitism Traditional Images of the Jews 27 Second Wave: The Crises of the 1930s and the Revival of Antisemitism 34 The Reach of Antisemitism: How Influential Was It? 45 The Administrative Response 54 The Refugee Crisis, 1938-41 58 Chapter 3 / The Strategy o f Xavier Vallat, i 9 4 !-4 2 The Beginnings of German Pressure 77 Vichy Defines the Jewish Issue, 1941 83 Vallat: An Activist at Work 96 The Emigration Deadlock 112 Vallat’s Fall 115 Chapter 4 / The System at Work, 1040-42 The CGQJ and Other State Agencies: Rivalries and Border Disputes 128 Business as Usual 144 Aryanization 152 Emigration 161 The Camps 165 Chapter 5 / Public Opinion, 1040-42 The Climax of Popular Antisemitism 181 The DistriBution of Popular Antisemitism 186 A Special Case: Algeria 191 The Churches and the Jews 197 X C ontents The Opposition 203 An Indifferent Majority 209 Chapter 6 / The Turning Point: Summer 1Q42 215 New Men, New Measures 218 The Final Solution 220 Laval and the Final Solution 228 The Effort to Segregate: The Jewish Star 234 Preparing the Deportation 241 The Vel d’Hiv Roundup 250 Drancy 252 Roundups in the Unoccupied Zone 255 The Massacre of the Innocents 263 The Turn in PuBlic Opinion 270 Chapter 7 / The Darquier Period, 1942-44 281 Darquier’s CGQJ and Its Place in the Regime 286 Darquier’s CGQJ in Action 294 Total Occupation and the Resumption of Deportations 302 Vichy, the ABBé Catry, and the Massada Zionists 310 The Italian Interlude 315 Denaturalization, August 1943: Laval’s Refusal 321 Last Days 329 Chapter 8 / Conclusions: The Holocaust in France .
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Systems Integration: Implications for Public Policy
    Energy Policy 143 (2020) 111609 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy Policy journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol ☆ Energy Systems Integration: Implications for public policy Carlo Cambini a,*, Raffaele Congiu a, Tooraj Jamasb b, Manuel Llorca b, Golnoush Soroush c a Department of Management, Politecnico di Torino, Italy b Copenhagen School of Energy Infrastructure (CSEI), Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School, Denmark c Florence School of Regulation – European University Institute, Florence, Italy ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT JEL classification: Energy Systems Integration (ESI) is an emerging paradigm and at the centre of the EU energy debate. ESI takes a L51 holistic view of the electricity, gas, and heat sectors to deliver a clean, reliable, and affordable energy system. By L94 using the synergies within and between sectors, ESI aims to increase flexibility in the energy system, maximise Q4 the integration of renewable energy and distributed generation, and reduce environmental impact. While ESI- Keywords: enabling technologies have been studied from a technical perspective, the economic, regulatory, and policy Energy systems integration dimensions of ESI are yet to be analysed in depth. This paper discusses ESI in a multi-step approach. We first Sector coupling Regulation focus on the economics of ESI-enabling technologies. Then we briefly discuss how the EU national regulators Innovation incentivise their adoption. Major economic and policy barriers to ESI are identified and policy solutions to Research and development overcome these barriers are proposed. We conclude that current regulatory frameworks in the EU do not suf­ Economic and policy barriers ficiently stimulate ESI investments and only through proper design of incentives ESI can be adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Liberation : Myths and History Perhaps More Than Any Other
    L2: WW2 France & the Historians: Libération 1 The Liberation : myths and history Perhaps more than any other aspect of the Second World War, the Libération was the subject of myth-making, at the time and subsequently. This should not surprise us. Contemoraries were conscious of living an historic moment, one that seemed like the reversal of the verdict of 1940. For those in the Resistance or the Free French, it was an apotheosis. For their antagonists, collaborating directly with the Germans (the French fascists) or supporters of Vichy, it was a nemesis. For everyone, it raised the alternatives of whether this was the end of a bitterly divisive parenthesis and a return to normality or the start of a radically new phase in French history, perhaps even a revolution of sorts. Wherever one stood, the stakes could not have been higher. So it is no wonder that historical meaning was imparted to the Libération at the time and afterwards by politicians and others. The question for us is what sense have historians made of the Libération, whether as part of this broader ascription of meaning to the end of the Occupation or independently of it. The more or less instantaneous myth-making is evidenced by de Gaulle’s speech with which we began course, suggesting central idea of ‘self-liberation’, and also the PCF emerging from clandestinity with image of the FFI as a kind of popular unrising, incarnating justice against the collaborators. Chronologically, the Libération was spread over ten months, from June 1944 to May 1945. But the epicentre was July-August 1944, once the Allies broke out of the Normandy beacheads and also landed in Provence.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles De Gaulle - Wikipedia Charles De Gaulle from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    338 REKHITA [to scarify] [= TA-KI-RI] FILIP FALETOLU KAWATIRI ©All Rights Reserved Courtesy: De Gaulle during World War II, Wikipedia wearing the two stars of a général de brigade on his sleeve. President of France Co-Prince of Andorra 27/07/2017 Charles de Gaulle - Wikipedia Charles de Gaulle From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Charles André Joseph Marie de Gaulle (French: [ a l də ʃ ʁ Charles de Gaulle ɡol]; 22 November 1890 – 9 November 1970) was a French general and statesman. He was the leader of Free France (1940–44) and the head of the Provisional Government of the French Republic (1944–46). In 1958, he founded the Fifth Republic and was elected as the President of France, a position he held until his resignation in 1969. He was the dominant figure of France during the Cold War era and his memory continues to influence French politics. Born in Lille, he graduated from Saint-Cyr in 1912. He was a decorated officer of the First World War, wounded several times, and later taken prisoner at Verdun. During the interwar period, he advocated mobile armoured divisions. During the German invasion of May 1940, he led an armoured division which counterattacked the invaders; he was then appointed Under-Secretary for War. Refusing to accept his government's armistice with Nazi Germany, de Gaulle President of France exhorted the French population to resist occupation and to Co-Prince of Andorra continue the fight in his Appeal of 18 June. He led a In office government in exile and the Free French Forces against the 8 January 1959 – 28 April 1969 Axis.
    [Show full text]
  • Interior Freedom in the French-Language Poetry Written in the Concentration Camps (1943-45)
    Interior Freedom in the French-language Poetry Written in the Concentration Camps (1943-45) Belle Marie Joseph A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the Australian National University January 2017 © Copyright by Belle Marie Joseph 2017 All Rights Reserved This thesis presents my own original research. All sources have been duly acknowledged. Except where acknowledged in the customary manner, the material presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge, original and has not been submitted in whole or part for a degree in any university. Belle Joseph 27 January 2017 ii Acknowledgements I would like to extend my thanks, first of all, to my supervisors. I am deeply grateful to Peter Brown, who supervised this project from its beginnings and whose expertise and encouragement throughout the project were invaluable. Gillian Russell provided helpful input at the beginning of my research. Ned Curthoys gave invaluable feedback at each stage of my project; I am grateful for his insightful and constructive comments. Sincere thanks to Ash Collins, who provided thoughtful commentary on the completed thesis draft. I would also like to thank my many wonderful colleagues in the School of Literature, Language and Linguistics (SLLL) at ANU, who often provided useful suggestions in informal discussions about my research, and in particular Kate Flaherty, who kindly read drafts of the thesis introduction and the first chapter and gave me helpful comments on them. I would also like to acknowledge that this research was supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship. My warmest thanks go to the directors and staff of the various associations for former déportés , who gave me invaluable assistance with my research.
    [Show full text]
  • French Legal and Regulatory Update – February 2016
    French Legal and Regulatory Update – February 2016 Contact The Paris office of Hogan Lovells is pleased to provide this English language edition of our monthly e-newsletter, which offers a legal and regulatory update covering France and Europe for February 2016. Bruno Knadjian Avocat à la Cour, Partner Please note that French legal concepts are translated into English for information only and not as legal advice. The concepts expressed in English may not exactly reflect or correspond to similar concepts existing under the laws of the jurisdictions of the Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP readers. 17, Avenue Matignon CS 60021 If you would like to consult this newsletter from past months, please click here. 75008 Paris Tél. : +33 1 53 67 47 47 Please send an e-mail to [email protected] if you wish to subscribe to this publication. Fax : +33 1 53 67 47 48 For additional information, please speak to your usual contact. Hoganlovells.com Summary of miscellaneous French draft legislation Draft constitutional law to amend the Environment Chart to specify the scope of the precautionary principle, filed at the Senate on December 3, 2013 – Adopted in first reading by the Senate on May 27, 2014. Draft law on class actions for discrimination and fight against inequalities, n°1699, filed before the National Assembly on January 14, 2014 – Adopted in first reading by the National Assembly on June 10, 2015. Draft law relating to biodiversity, n°1847, filed on March 26, 2014 – Adopted in first reading by the National Assembly on March 24, 2015 and by the Senate on January 26, 2016 – Under examination in new reading by the National Assembly from March 15, 2016.
    [Show full text]