DOCSLIB.ORG

Cross-Cultural Research Collaborations: Information For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cross-Cultural Research Collaborations: Information For Cross-Cultural Research Collaborations: Information for Collaborators Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok (Thailand) https://osf.io/z3xy4/ With the aim of improving the generalisability of psychological research, we are seeking to try and remove (some of) the barriers that might typically inhibit or demotivate researchers from stepping outside of WEIRD (Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) society samples and engaging in cross-cultural collaborations. Teaching students in a non-WEIRD (Thai) society has been a revelation in appreciating how many theories describing ‘human behaviour’ require a cultural disclaimer and I think we need to do much more to understand the applicability of theories in different cultures. However, it’s often far from straightforward to conduct cross-cultural research because of the difficulty in accessing heterogeneous samples of participants, particularly in the absence of existing collaborations or institutional links, (this is perhaps especially true for postgraduates or ECRs). In response, we would like to invite anyone who is interested in engaging in cross- cultural data collection to contact us and discuss collaboration - we would be particularly keen to hear from any researchers who have effects from data collected using participants in a WEIRD society and would like us to perform a direct replication of their experiment as an additional test of the effect.. Ideally, this could be as simple as you sharing the code for your experimental program and we’ll set it up and collect the data for you. At the outset, we have one highly conscientious and motivated research assistant who is available to work on this part time; hopefully more funding will be available for this depending on interest. 1. Background and Motivation The Faculty of Psychology at Chulalongkorn University has a rich history of cross- cultural collaborations with affiliations to institutions in the US, UK, Australia, and Japan. Consequently, we have a wide range of ongoing research collaborations between our staff and members of faculty at affiliated Universities; typically involving collaboration at each stage of the research cycle: e.g., theorising, planning, data collection, analysis, writing, editing, etc. These kinds of cross-cultural collaborations where there exists mutual responsibility at each stage have considerable merit and are useful for a wide range of reasons. However, we also believe there is scope for developing a different type of collaborative approach that instead seeks to directly address two of the primary issues facing psychology as a science: generalisability and reproducibility. 1.1. Issues of Generalisability “Growing attention has been drawn to the lack of diversity in psychological testing, in particular to the fact that the vast majority of psychological research has been conducted on populations that are unrepresentative of human culture more globally—those from WEIRD (Western, educated, industrial, rich, and democratic) backgrounds (Henrich et al., 2010; Legare and Harris, 2016; Nielsen and Haun, 2016). The dearth of systematic research outside of Western cultural contexts is a major impediment to theoretical progress in the psychological sciences (Legare and Nielsen, 2015 ; Rowley and Camacho, 2015). Where psychological researchers assume that data are not specific to the sample of participants under direct test (i.e., that findings are generalizable), lack of attention to cultural variation and its psychological consequences risks yielding incomplete, and potentially inaccurate, conclusions (e.g., Apicella and Barrett, 2016; Evans and Schamberg, 2009; Mani et al., 2013 ; Votruba-Drzal et al., 2016).” (Nielsen, Haun, Kärtner, & Legare, 2017, pp. 32): The quote above from Nielsen and colleagues effectively expresses our own perspectives on the present issues of diversity and generalisability inherent in psychological research. However, despite acknowledgment of the issues of generalisability and the use of WEIRD participants, there has been a widespread reluctance for researchers to engage in cross-cultural research or test their theories in heterogeneous samples. This reluctance is perhaps best understood through limited opportunities and incentives. 1.1.1. Opportunities: A major barrier to cross-cultural research is that it is not straightforward to develop collaborations that facilitate access to culturally heterogeneous samples and developing such collaborations is likely to take considerable time and resources whereby relationships are forged over a long time period. Thus, for PhD students or labs that do not have a strong relationship with researchers in another culture, there is often not the time or opportunity to develop the necessary links that might facilitate cross-cultural research. 1.1.2. Incentives: Put simply, researchers have few incentives to collect data from a heterogeneous sample. Journals have generally expressed only a modest preference for publishing data that includes non-WEIRD participants. Understandably, when researchers have limited time and resources, testing their theories in another sample is quite a low priority. 1.2. Issues of Reproducibility Following the well-publicised issues surrounding reproducibility in psychology (Open Science Collaboration, 2015), there is a growing momentum towards the potential benefits of multi-site collaborative projects for improving statistical power and transparency in research (Munafò et al., 2017). For example, if a researcher is to have sufficient power to detect a small or moderate size effect (depending on the nature of the design), this might require a sample size that is too large to feasibly collect all the data from one lab, whereas it may be achieved instead by involving many labs in a distributed data collection process. Similarly, this ‘Team Science’ approach increases the level of transparency in the data collection process, as well as allowing for greater understanding of the effects of culture. Through adopting a structured approach to facilitating collaborations, we can go some way to make these opportunities available for researchers, at least for those individuals who are sufficiently motivated. With respect to the issue of incentives, these are admittedly rather limited in the present climate. However, we strongly feel that we are reaching a stage where genuine shifts are being made towards “(a) encouraging publication of studies that feature non-WEIRD participants, (b) encouraging replication in a new population of a previously established finding, and (c) encouraging theoretically motivated cross-cultural comparisons” (Nielsen et al., 2017, pp. 35). Provided the opportunity is there, we think the incentives will only increase of the coming years. 2. Data Collection Collaboration 2.1. Collaboration Process 1. Read the OSF page to get the latest details of the project: https://osf.io/z3xy4/ 2. Contact us via email ([email protected]) and provide details of your research study you would like us to collaborate on; including details of: sample size, demographics of participants, and summary of methods. For full details of what to provide see the link here. 3. We consider feasibility of data collection based on the number of participants required, time frame, availability of research assistants, equipment, etc. a. If feasible, we accept and assign a lead researcher based on their expertise in research area. b. We reject if not feasible 4. You share the relevant experimental materials (e.g., code, questionnaires, etc.) and a fully detailed description of the study procedures and protocol. 5. We perform any relevant translations of questionnaires and study information. 6. If you do not have IRB approval that covers our data collection, we will submit the study details to our office of ethics review committee for research involving human research subjects. 7. We pilot test the experiment for qualitative feedback 8. We collect the data. 9. We share the data with you. 10. We will assist in writing the manuscript and offering relevant cultural perspectives. Note. To facilitate transparency in the research process, all experimental details and anonymised data will be shared to a project page hosted on OSF.io. If you would prefer that these were kept private until after publication we can discuss this. 2.2. Who We Want to Collaborate With? We are keen to hear from any researchers who are interested in collaborating with us to collect data. At the outset, we are especially keen to hear from researchers who already have data (from at least a single study) showing an effect (or null effect) in a WEIRD society and would like to extend and replicate their study design in a sample of Thai participants. Whilst we are in the initial stages, we would also prefer to collaborate on research that is reasonably straightforward to implement. For example, we would particularly encourage researchers who have replicable experimental code that can be setup to run on our computers, or with researchers who are interested in questionnaire measures. 2.3. What Do We Get Out of The Collaboration? If you publish the research with the data we have collected, we would ask for the lead researcher based in the Faculty of Psychology at Chulalongkorn University to be included as a co-author on the paper. If you decide not to publish the data, we would like to have the option to publish any outcomes ourselves; the specifics of this can be discussed on a case by case basis. 3. Further Details and Questions. 3.1. Our Location and Thai
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding the Value of Arts & Culture | the AHRC Cultural Value
    Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska 2 Understanding the value of arts & culture The AHRC Cultural Value Project Geoffrey Crossick & Patrycja Kaszynska THE AHRC CULTURAL VALUE PROJECT CONTENTS Foreword 3 4. The engaged citizen: civic agency 58 & civic engagement Executive summary 6 Preconditions for political engagement 59 Civic space and civic engagement: three case studies 61 Part 1 Introduction Creative challenge: cultural industries, digging 63 and climate change 1. Rethinking the terms of the cultural 12 Culture, conflict and post-conflict: 66 value debate a double-edged sword? The Cultural Value Project 12 Culture and art: a brief intellectual history 14 5. Communities, Regeneration and Space 71 Cultural policy and the many lives of cultural value 16 Place, identity and public art 71 Beyond dichotomies: the view from 19 Urban regeneration 74 Cultural Value Project awards Creative places, creative quarters 77 Prioritising experience and methodological diversity 21 Community arts 81 Coda: arts, culture and rural communities 83 2. Cross-cutting themes 25 Modes of cultural engagement 25 6. Economy: impact, innovation and ecology 86 Arts and culture in an unequal society 29 The economic benefits of what? 87 Digital transformations 34 Ways of counting 89 Wellbeing and capabilities 37 Agglomeration and attractiveness 91 The innovation economy 92 Part 2 Components of Cultural Value Ecologies of culture 95 3. The reflective individual 42 7. Health, ageing and wellbeing 100 Cultural engagement and the self 43 Therapeutic, clinical and environmental 101 Case study: arts, culture and the criminal 47 interventions justice system Community-based arts and health 104 Cultural engagement and the other 49 Longer-term health benefits and subjective 106 Case study: professional and informal carers 51 wellbeing Culture and international influence 54 Ageing and dementia 108 Two cultures? 110 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection Development Policy for the Conservation Collection, Available Upon Request
    Collection Development Policy Collections Information Center Statement for the Conservation 1200 Getty Center Drive, Suite 700 Los Angeles, CA 90049-1684 Collection in the Research Library at the Getty Research Institute This Collection Development Policy Statement for the Conservation Collection in the Research Library at the Getty Research Institute (GRI) articulates the precise scope and policy for cultural heritage conservation literature acquired and retained within the Research Library. What began as a modest collection supporting the program activities of the Getty Conservation Institute (GCI) has become a significant resource for conservation research throughout the world. Nearly thirty years of sustained growth in the Research Library’s holdings of conservation literature has prompted periodic assessments of the Conservation Collection, and the revision of this policy statement for its continued growth and development. This policy will be reviewed and updated as needed at least every three years by the GCI Collection Development Librarian, the Manager of GCI Research Resources, and Manager of Library Collection Development and Acquisitions. Purpose of the Policy Statement This Collection Development Policy Statement is designed to serve a range of purposes. The Policy is intended to: • define and clarify the collecting policies of the Collection • guide the Collection Development Librarian in coordinating the activities to select and acquire resources for the collection • justify budget appropriations and guide expenditures • delineate and evaluate existing strengths and weaknesses in the Collection • articulate and emphasize the Collection’s vital relationship to other research resources managed by the Research Library and the GCI This Policy Statement for the Conservation Collection documents its: I.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannabis (Sub)Culture, the Subcultural Repository, and Networked Mediation
    SIMULATED SESSIONS: CANNABIS (SUB)CULTURE, THE SUBCULTURAL REPOSITORY, AND NETWORKED MEDIATION Nathan J. Micinski A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2014 Committee: Ellen Berry, Advisor Rob Sloane © 2014 Nathan Micinski All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Ellen Berry, Advisor Subcultural theory is traditionally rooted in notions of social deviance or resistance. The criteria for determining who or what qualifies as subcultures, and the most effective ways to study them, are based on these assumptions. This project seeks to address these traditional modes of studying subcultures and discover ways in which their modification may lead to new understandings and ways of studying subcultures in the contemporary moment. This will be done by suggesting a change in the criteria of examining subcultures from that of deviance or resistance to identification with a collection of images, symbols, rituals, and narratives. The importance of this distinction is the ability to utilize the insights that studying subcultures can offer while avoiding the faults inherent in speaking for or at a subculture rather than with or from it. Beyond addressing theoretical concerns, this thesis aims to apply notions of subcultural theory to study the online community of Reddit, in particular, a subset known as r/trees–a virtual repository for those images, symbols, rituals, and narratives of cannabis subculture. R/trees illustrates the life and vibrancy of a unique subcultural entity, which to this point has evaded a cultural studies analysis. To that end, this project advocates for the importance of the cultural studies approach to analyzing cannabis subculture and further, to insert the findings of this study into that gap in the literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection Policy
    COLLECTION POLICY Collecting is at the heart of the Witte Museum’s mission and must be done with clear purpose and well-articulated guidelines. The museum’s Collection Plan provides the guidelines for what the museum will collect. The Collection Policy sets forth the professional standards and responsibilities for the care and management of collections as required of an accredited museum. The Collections Department Procedures Manual covers procedures for implementing this policy. This policy should be reviewed every five years or as necessary to reflect changes in staff, strategic plan, Collection Plan, or museum practices at large. I. MISSION Statement The Witte Museum promotes lifelong learning through innovative exhibitions, programs, and collections in natural history, science, and South Texas heritage II. VISION STATEMENT Through innovative programs in history, science, and culture the Witte Museum enriches lives, promotes a quality of life for all South Texas people and generates a legacy of knowledge. III. VALUES Learning organization Collection Stewardship Quality programs and exhibitions Fiscal stability Environmental stewardship Professional ethic Welcoming environment Approved 09/20/2017 1 IV. TYPES OF COLLECTIONS The Witte Museum possesses five types of collections: Accessioned, Library, Research, Living, and Educational. The Witte shall designate at the time of acquisition the collection category to which material is assigned. The assigned category may change as the priorities and collections of the Witte evolve. Accessioned Collections Items in the Accessioned Collections shall relate directly to the Mission Statement of the Witte and shall be used solely for exhibitions, research, publications, exhibition loans, education, and Witte branding and merchandising. The documentation, care and disposition of accessioned items are governed by this policy and museum best practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection of Online Sources for Cultural Anthropology Videos In
    Collection of Online Sources for Cultural Anthropology Videos in Anthropology Man and His Culture (14:51) The movie shows, in the imaginative form of a 'REPORT FROM OUTER SPACE,' how the ways of mankind might appear to visitors from another planet. Considers the things most cultures have in common and the ways they change as they pass from one generation to the next. Key words: Culture, Cultural universals, Language, Culture Change Chemically Dependent Agriculture (48:59) The change from smaller, more diverse farms to larger single-crop farms in the US has led to greater reliance on pesticides for pest management. Key words: Agriculture; Culture change, Food, Pesticide, Law The Story of Stuff (21:24) The Story of Stuff is a 20-minute, fast-paced, fact-filled look at the underside of our production and consumption patterns. Key words: Culture of consumption; Consumerism, Environment The Real Truth About Religion (26:43) Although the ancients incorporated many different conceptions of god(s) and of celestial bodies, the sun, the most majestic of all entities was beheld with awe, revered, adored and worshiped as the supreme deity. Key words: Religion, Symbolism, Symbolic Language, System of Beliefs Selected by Diana Gellci, Ph.D Updated 5.3.16 Collection of Online Sources for Cultural Anthropology The Arranged Marriage (Kashmiri) (20:48) Niyanta and Rohin, our lovely Kashmiri couple are an epitome of the popular saying "for everyone there is someone somewhere". Love struck when Rohin from South Africa met the Kashmiri beauty from Pune. They decided to get married. Everyone called it an arranged marriage, an "Arranged Marriage" with a rare amalgamation of Beauty, Emotions and above all Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualization of Cultural Heritage Collection Data: State of the Art and Future Challenges
    This article has been accepted for publication in a future issue of this journal, but has not been fully edited. Content may change prior to final publication. Citation information: DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2830759, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1 Visualization of Cultural Heritage Collection Data: State of the Art and Future Challenges Florian Windhager, Paolo Federico, Gunther¨ Schreder, Katrin Glinka, Marian Dork,¨ Silvia Miksch, Member, IEEE, and Eva Mayr Abstract—After decades of digitization, large cultural heritage collections have emerged on the web, which contain massive stocks of content from galleries, libraries, archives, and museums. This increase in digital cultural heritage data promises new modes of analysis and increased levels of access for academic scholars and casual users alike. Going beyond the standard representations of search-centric and grid-based interfaces, a multitude of approaches has recently started to enable visual access to cultural collections, and to explore them as complex and comprehensive information spaces by the means of interactive visualizations. In contrast to conventional web interfaces, we witness a widening spectrum of innovative visualization types specially designed for rich collections from the cultural heritage sector. This new class of information visualizations gives rise to a notable diversity of interaction and representation techniques while lending currency and urgency to a discussion about principles such as serendipity, generosity, and criticality in connection with visualization design. With this survey, we review information visualization approaches to digital cultural heritage collections and reflect on the state of the art in techniques and design choices. We contextualize our survey with humanist perspectives on the field and point out opportunities for future research.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of the Challenges Faced During Cross-Cultural Research
    An Overview of the Challenges faced during Cross-Cultural Research Moon Halder, Jens Binder, James Stiller and Mick Gregson Institution: Nottingham Trent University Email: [email protected] Abstract Cultural diversity in cross-cultural research is something which academic researchers need to recognise. This paper is an overview of the challenges faced during a cross- cultural research project in UK and in India. It identifies challenges which academic researchers can face in relation to data collection, cultural obligation and peer pressure, ethical considerations and awareness, the experiences working with a cross-cultural team and issues faced at personal level. This paper recommends ways for how such challenges could be addressed without compromising on the quality of the research. Personal experiences along with a review of literature in intercultural psychology suggest that an understanding of cultural norms, approaches and behaviours along with flexible and adaptable methodological and high ethical awareness are vital. Translation, instrumentation and data collection, cultural obligation and peer pressure are some of the crucial factors discussed. Keywords Culture, Individualist, Collectivist, Individualism, Collectivism. 1 Culture defines to a large extent who we are, how we perceive our environment around us and how we behave (Nisbett & Miyamoto, 2005; Oyserman & Lee, 2008). Understanding behaviours requires an understanding of cultural specific norms, values and behaviours. While Western cultures (typically labelled Individualist) are considered more independent, self-focussed and autonomous, Eastern cultures (typically labelled Collectivist) are considered more interdependent, group orientated and focussed on maintaining harmony (Markus & Kitayama, 1991; Triandis et al. 1988). As researchers in social sciences and related disciplines, it is important that consideration of such cultural differences are acknowledged when formulating and implementing research strategies and interpreting findings.
    [Show full text]
  • INFORMATION in PURSUIT of the “GOOD DEATH”: LIBRARIES' ROLE in the DEATH POSITIVITY MOVEMENT (Paper)
    Roger Chabot Western University, London, Ontario, Canada INFORMATION IN PURSUIT OF THE “GOOD DEATH”: LIBRARIES’ ROLE IN THE DEATH POSITIVITY MOVEMENT (Paper) Abstract: The Death Positivity Movement (DPM) is a recent social and activist movement seeking to change the North American “culture of silence” surrounding death and dying. Seeking to engage with the conference theme of “conversations across boundaries,” this presentation presents arguments as to why libraries should be involved in the movement and also outlines more specifically actions that they can take to be involved. In this presentation, a short introduction to the DPM will be provided, followed by a brief discussion of the concept of the “good death”. Arguments will then be made explaining why libraries should be involved in the DPM and then the last section explores more specifically how libraries can be involved through collection development, community assistance and programming. 1. Introduction The Death Positivity Movement (DPM, or sometimes Death Positive Movement) is a recent social and activist movement seeking to change the North American “culture of silence” (Doughty, 2019b) surrounding death and dying. The modern DPM is relatively novel, and until now has been primarily driven through the publishing and sharing of content on social media (Hayasaki, 2013). However, as the movement grows, libraries are well positioned to be involved in the movement through their role as information providers and community builders. In turn, the pursuit of the goals of the DPM fulfills the mission of libraries. In engaging with the CAIS/ACSI 2019 conference theme of “conversations across boundaries,” this presentation explores the current and future relationship between the DPM and libraries to bring awareness to it and to further promote its growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Anthropology
    Georgia State University Library Collection Development Policy Department of Anthropology Purpose of the Collection: To support the curricular and research needs of faculty and students in the Department of Anthropology in the sub-disciplines of social or cultural anthropology, physical or biological anthropology, archaeology, and linguistic anthropology. The Department offers courses of study leading to the Bachelor of Arts and Master of Arts. The Master of Arts program emphasizes research and teaching related to urban contexts, processes, and populations. Students receive training in local, regional, and global transformations, quantitative and qualitative research methods, and theories of human nature, society, and culture. In addition, students gain practical skills, including proposal writing, project development, field research, ethnographic needs-assessments, community development, and program evaluation. Graduate students are trained in theories, methods, topics, and skills in archaeology, biological anthropology, cultural anthropology, and its applied domains. General Collection Guidelines: a. Languages: English is the preferred language. Literature in other languages is acquired when requested. b. Chronological Guidelines: Prehistoric time for all continents, selectively, to the present. c. Geographical Guidelines: Focus is on the urban southeastern United States, especially for the applied anthropology graduate program. Major research interests include North America (emphasis on Native Americans, Southeastern U.S.A, Southwestern U.S.A, and Texas); Central America (particularly Mexico and Belize) and the Caribbean; South America (particularly Argentina); Africa south of the Sahara; industrialized Europe (particularly Greece); the Middle East, and Southeast Asia (particularly China). Other regions are selectively collected selectively. d. Date of Publication: Current publications are of primary importance. Retrospective classic or standard works not already in the collection are selectively collected.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition and Disposal of Collections
    139 ACQUISITION AND DISPOSAL OF COLLECTIONS The goal of collections development is to shape collections whose composition supports a collecting unit’s mission and programs. The main tools of collections development are acquisitions and disposals. This chapter discusses these tools. acquisition and disposal 140 ollections are acquired through various methods, such as donation, field collection, transfer from another organization, and purchase. “Disposal” means termination of ownership and physical removal of accession C 1 collection items. In the United States, “deaccessioning” and “disposal” are often used interchangeably, but technically the former term refers only to the first step in disposal — the removal of an item from the catalogue of accession collections.2 The first section of this chapter addresses acquisitions, with particular emphasis on how collecting units have built their collections, the policy framework related to acquisitions, and how collecting units are responding to a changed collecting environment. It also examines how collecting units make acquisition decisions, and considers alternatives to traditional collection methods. The second section addresses deaccessioning and disposal. It discusses the reasons units dispose of items, and the obstacles to disposal. The role of organizational and professional culture in collections development is discussed. Also discussed briefly is the issue of duplication and overlap of collections at the Smithsonian. The chapter closes with conclusions. FINDINGS acquisitions Collecting appears to be an innate human propensity. Archaeological excavations indicate, for example, that 80,000 years ago Neanderthals assembled collections of small stones (Neal 1980, 24). Norman Rosenthal, exhibitions secretary at the Royal 1 Collecting units also dispose of non-accessioned items, but that is not the focus here.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Matters: the Peace Corps Cross-Cultural Workbook
    Culture Matters The Peace Corps Cross-Cultural Workbook c Peace Corps Information Collection and Exchange T0087 ISBN 0-9644472-3-1 For sale by the U.S. Government Printing Office Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328 (202) 512-1800 Culture Matters, The Peace Corps first extensive cross-cultural workbook for the volunteers, represents a major effort forward in cross-cultural training. As community involvement is always important, there were many people who have contributed to this work. The Peace Corps acknowledges the following people in the intercultural field who kindly responded to our request for activities: Robert Kohls, Geert Hofstede, Ned Seelye, LaRay Barna, Michael Paige, Margaret Pusch, Diane Hofner Saphiere, Ann Wederspahn, Neal Goodman, Noel Kreicker, and Pierre Corbeil, and to Intercultural Press for their permission to include published material. The Peace Corps would like to thank the following people who contributed, enhanced and reviewed the workbook: Raquel Aronhime, Judee Blohm, Brenda Bowman, Joe Byrnes, John Coyne, Doug Gilzow, Diego Hay, Lani Havens, Duane Karlen, Lee Lacy, Mary Jo Larsen, Anne Latimer, Bill Perry, Kathy Rulon, Jim Russell, and Patrick Triano; Judy Benjamin for editorial assistance and efforts; Steve Jacobs for design and layout; Craig Storti, for reseach and writing in collaboration with Laurette Bennhold-Samaan, Cross-Cultural Specialist. This workbook is dedicated to Peace Corps trainees and Volunteers. We hope as you read this you will hear your own voices, and read and write your own cross-cultural stories. The Center's Information Collection and Exchange (ICE) makes available the strategies and technologies developed by Peace Corps Volunteers, their co-workers, and their counterparts to development organizations and workers who might find them useful.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction: the Evolution of Culture in a Microcosm
    1 Introduction: The Evolution of Culture in a Microcosm Stephen C. Levinson Evolutionary speculation constitutes a kind of metascience, which has the same intellectual fascination for some biologists that metaphysical speculation possessed for some medieval scholastics. It can be considered a relatively harmless habit, like eating peanuts, unless it assumes the form of an obsession; then it becomes a vice. —R. V. Stanier, Some aspects of the biology of cells in H. Charles and B. Knight (eds.), Organization and Control in Prokaryotic Cells As the quotation here suggests, this volume is full of the vice of speculation. Yet any student of the human condition can hardly avoid it. Somehow culture—or at least the culture-bearing ape—evolved. An evolutionary perspective on human culture, which is much less fashionable now than it was 70 or more years ago, seems inevitable, yet the social sciences actively resist it, allowing ill-informed conjectures from other sci- ences (which does little to increase the interest from the social sciences of course). In this introductory chapter, I try to do two things: The first is to deal frontally, and speculatively, with what I take to be the “big questions” about the evolution of human culture. This may serve as a partial introduction to the more detailed explo- rations in other chapters in this volume. The second is to give the reader some grist for these speculative mills. I will argue that if we look at the details of any culture, it is quite clear that we need an evolutionary perspective to understand how such fea- tures could have arisen (note that such a perspective is quite consistent with other kinds of social science explanations).
    [Show full text]