DOCSLIB.ORG

The Legacy and Significance of Archbishop Thomas Cranmer, 1558-1660

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

'There was never man handled as I am': The Legacy and Significance of Archbishop Thomas Cranmer, 1558-1660 Stephen Lamb ui The Department of History Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada Q Stephen Lamb, 200 1 National Library Bibiiothèque nationale 1+1 OfCada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bioliographit Senrices servicet bibliogaphiques The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence aiiowing the exclusive permettant à la National Libmy of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, Ioan, distniute or seil reproduire, prêter, distriiner ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thése sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fh, de reproduction sur papier ou sur fomiat électtonique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright m this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni Ia thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othenvise de ceiie-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduçed without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son pennt-ssion. autorisatioa iii ABSTRACT 'There was never man handled as 1am': The Legacy and Significance of Archbishop Thomas Cranmer, 1558- 1660 Stephen Lamb For centuries. historians and theologians have acknowledged the pre-eminent role of Thomas Cranmer in the English Reformation. However, his significance as an enduring religious influence in the century following his martyrdom has not received close investigation. This thesis traces the legacy and significance of Cranmer f?om the Elizabethan Settlement to the Restoration, focussing especially upon important mid-seventeenth-century religious debates. Interpretations of Cranmer during 1558- 1660 provide strong indications of where English Protestantism stood theologically, and how highly many Protestants valued the refomis enacted under Cranmer and his colleagues during the reign of Edward 1(1547-1553). This legacy has a significant bearing upon how one interprets English Protestantism, as it demonstrates a commitment to the Reformed theology of Cranmer's later years and a Iack of continuity with Roman Catholic antecedents. Furthemore, mid-seventeenth century interpretations of Cranmer demonstrate the importance of religious factors in the EngIisti Civil Wars. Changing interpretations of Cranmer by radical puritans and Laudians highlight the innovative nature of religious reforms leading to and during the hostilities of the I640s, whilst the use of Cranmer by moderates within the English Church reveais a longstanding reverence for and adherence to the doctrine of the Edwardian reformers. Thus, this examination reveals the construction of Cranmer as a universally approved Protestant hem during the Elizabethan era, lasting into the 1630s. Thts came undone in the mid- seventeenth century, however, as debates over the eucharist, episcopacy, and Iinirgy forced Laudians, Presbyterians, and especiaily radica! puritans, to re- evaluate Cranmer and the roIe he played in the Edwardiau Refonnation. It is upon the completion of a seemingly solitary effort such as a M.A. thesis that one cornes to realise the debts owed to so many for one's academic progress. While this thesis has been a work of discovery and serendipirj, and perhaps more of a pedagogical exercise than scholarly contribution, it none the less has been moulded by a great many people who deserve mention, whether for their contribution to its production, or for their contribution to my uitellectual development. Above all, 1must warmly thank my supervisor, Robert Tittler, for his patience, dedication, willingness to work in new areas, and for htsuggesting the topic to me one year ago. 1must also thank the other two examiners of this thesis for being so much more than careful examiners. During my time at Concordia, Fred Bode has provided me with constant intetlectual inspiration as well as fiiendship, and Shannon McSheffiey has been a mode1 of both industry and helpfiilness. In reaching this point in my academic life, 1must aIso acknowledge the following in particular: the enonnous influence of John Craig, who provided me, as a keen but IargeIy ignorant undergraduate, with no end of help, encouragement, and inspiration; Mary Vipond, for curing my distaste for histotiography and methodology; Deloris Clavero, for cultivating in me a love of Literature in history; and Lawrin Armstrong, for heIping me to understand the importance of epics and historical visions. My experience at Concordia has been greatly enriched by two other factors, nameiy, the reguiar stimuIation of my reading group and the sense of community generated by the Graduate History Student Association, both of which I shail miss most dearfy. Fialiy, 1 must offer a word of thanks to rny parents, Gordon and Susan Lamb, for their steadfast support in al1 my endeavours. Concordia University Dominion Day, 200 1 Contents CHAPTER 2 CWTINCA PROmTANT HERO: FROM THE ELIZABETHAN SETTLEMENT TO THE EARLY STUART ERA .......... ................... ,.... ..... -.......-... 25 CHAPTER 3 "l'HE MOST LEARNED M THIS THEME OF OUR WTE DIV[NES': CRANMER AND THE EUCHARET DEBATE ........- ............-... .... ....-."--.., 49 CHAPTER 4 'SUCH A FlLTHY PRECEDENT': CRANMER AND THE SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY DEBATE OVER THE EPISCOPACY ...., .................... ... ...... 13 CHAPTER 5 M THE BLOOD OF TFIE MARTYRS: CRANlCIER ANù THE ENCLISH LlTURGY ,.,U...U.....-.-..- ..................... .... 94 CONCLUSION ..., .... ........ ..... ................... .... ......................... ..........-......-...... .... -.. 114 Chapter 1 Introduction: An Ambiguous Legacy? Writing in 1655, Thomas Fuller, in his Church History, provides one of the most sympathetic and apologetic accounts of the most famous Marian martyr. ' Fuller's discussion of Cranmer is most noteworthy for the apparent need he feels to defend the archbishop at every stage of his career, against a wide amy of opponents of the reforms Cranmer brought about. When dealing with both the ordination and !he execution of Cranmer, Fuller fends off accusations of opportunism and cowardice by Roman Catholic and radical purita. critics alike, the latter of whom are represented in the vituperation of William ~rynne.~This is rather curious given that many sacrarnentalists and puritans also used Cranmer's beliefs and exarnple to promote their particular visions of the churçtt, be it one of ceremony or of suffering. For the former, Cranmer's nile in creating the Prayer Book and his obvious support for an episcopacy made him an important figure in the drive to maintain a liturgy and prelacy against encroaching puritan reforms in the 1640s. For the latter, Cranmer's connections to European reformers and to nascent Calvinisrn, as well as his eucharistie views, served CObuttress mid-seventeenth-century claims hat Laudian reforms were threatening to ovemahost a century of proper Protestant worship. ' Thomas Fuller, The Church History (London, 1659, Book V, pp. 52-53,6I-73,90, 137-175, 196-20 1. 'Ibid., see esp. pp. 66-73. Fuller's treatment of Cranmer provides just one example of how early modem Engiish Protestants dealt with a religious heritage that couid be problematic, but nevertheless formed an essential basis upon which to build. Fuller presents Cranmer as a key reformer who representcd a mode1 of moderation, conservatism, and compromise. However, Fuller was by no means the first English scholar to deal with the problern of how to interpret such a complex and important figure. This study will deal with the legacy, reputation, and significance of Thomas Cranmer in the century foIlowing his martyrdom, focusing especially upon the mid-seventeenth century. Cranmer's mie in the creation of the Church of England is without doubt paramount. As Archbishop of Canterbury, compiler of the Book of Common Prayer, advocate of ecclesiastical legal reforrn, and foremost Marian martyr, he is an unavoidable and pre-eminent figure in the early course of the Reformation. Yet, he would have become a perplexing figure to the seventeenth-century mind. It is likely that Cranmer only embraced Caivinist doctrine in the later stages of bis life, and he never sought to enact reforms of church practice and governent along entirely Genevan ine es.^ He was ultimately willing to die for his anti-Catholic beliefs, yet he was willing to see Protestants deemed too radical die for theirs. His major contribution to the Church was an English liturgy, much detested by Catholics; yet this was still a prescnied and ritualistic liturgy, greatiy disliked by many puritans. He favoured a symbolic interpretation of the eucharist; however, bis position on this matter 3 See Diarmaid MacCuiioch,-Thornos Cnuuner, A Life (New Haven, 1996), p. 428. had changed several times during his ~ife.~Thus, he is a figure who would have been potentialIy usehl as well as problematic to both sides in debates over episcopacy, use of the Prayer Book, the meaning of the Lord's supper, and hinianism. Such debates are well known to students of seventeenth-century religious and political history. However, the significance of the sixteenth-century reformers in such debates is something that has not been explored in great depth. 1 propose to use Cranmer's legacy as a way of getting some bearings on such matters. Though he is by no means the only important source of influence sternming fiorn the sixteenth
Recommended publications
  • Lesser Feasts and Fasts 2018

    Lesser Feasts and Fasts 2018

    Lesser Feasts and Fasts 2018 Conforming to General Convention 2018 1 Preface Christians have since ancient times honored men and women whose lives represent heroic commitment to Christ and who have borne witness to their faith even at the cost of their lives. Such witnesses, by the grace of God, live in every age. The criteria used in the selection of those to be commemorated in the Episcopal Church are set out below and represent a growing consensus among provinces of the Anglican Communion also engaged in enriching their calendars. What we celebrate in the lives of the saints is the presence of Christ expressing itself in and through particular lives lived in the midst of specific historical circumstances. In the saints we are not dealing primarily with absolutes of perfection but human lives, in all their diversity, open to the motions of the Holy Spirit. Many a holy life, when carefully examined, will reveal flaws or the bias of a particular moment in history or ecclesial perspective. It should encourage us to realize that the saints, like us, are first and foremost redeemed sinners in whom the risen Christ’s words to St. Paul come to fulfillment, “My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness.” The “lesser feasts” provide opportunities for optional observance. They are not intended to replace the fundamental celebration of Sunday and major Holy Days. As the Standing Liturgical Commission and the General Convention add or delete names from the calendar, successive editions of this volume will be published, each edition bearing in the title the date of the General Convention to which it is a response.
  • Magis ... Pro Nostra Sentencia

    Magis ... Pro Nostra Sentencia

    "Magis ... Pro Nostra Sentencia": John Wyclif, his mediaeval Predecessors and reformed Successors, and a pseudo-Augustinian Eucharistic Decretal Augustiniana [Institutum Historicum Augustianum Lovanii], 45, fasc. 3-4 (1995), 213-245. John Wyclif had not a high regard for Lanfranc. There were general grounds: though he lived three hundred years earlier, Lanfranc was on the wrong side of the great millennial divide. For the first one thousand years after the ascension of Christ, Satan, the father of lies had been bound, as the Apocalypse says. Consequently, in that time, there had been a succession of truthful teachers, "correctly logical, philosophers conformed to the faith of Scripture".1 Ambrose, Augustine and Jerome were the principal of these, and "any of them is one thousand times more valuable than a dozen subsequent doctors and popes, when the enemy of truth is free and sowing lies contrary to the school of Christ".2 There were, moreover, particular grounds which moved Wyclif to go far beyond despising Lanfranc's authority. He both made him an object of invective, and also directed reason, as well as, scriptural and patristic authority against him. There was the manner of Lanfranc's attack on Berengarius, to whom Wyclif had a most ambiguous relation. He was strongly enthusiastic for the decretal "Ego Berengarius" which recorded the confession of Berengar. But this was, after all, an enforced retraction!3 They were, in Wyclif's view, fellow soldiers in the army of truth. Like the Berengar of the decretal, Wyclif held both that the sacrament of the altar was truly, even, "substantially", the body of Christ, and also that the identity of the sacrament and Christ's body was figurative.
  • Paul's Cross and the Culture of Persuasion in England, 1520–1640

    Paul's Cross and the Culture of Persuasion in England, 1520–1640

    Paul’s Cross and the Culture of Persuasion in England, 1520–1640 Studies in the History of Christian Traditions General Editor Robert J. Bast Knoxville, Tennessee In cooperation with Paul C.H. Lim, Nashville, Tennessee Eric Saak, Liverpool Christine Shepardson, Knoxville, Tennessee Brian Tierney, Ithaca, New York Arjo Vanderjagt, Groningen John Van Engen, Notre Dame, Indiana Founding Editor Heiko A. Oberman† VOLUME 171 The titles published in this series are listed at brill.com/shct Paul’s Cross and the Culture of Persuasion in England, 1520–1640 Edited by Torrance Kirby P.G. Stanwood LEIDEN • BOSTON 2014 Cover illustration and Frontispiece: ‘A sermon preached in the presence of King James I at Paul’s Cross’. The Society of Antiquaries’ diptych commissioned by Henry Farley in 1616 and painted by John Gipkyn. Scharf XLIII, Way/Museum No. 304, Burlington House, London. By kind permission of the Society of Antiquaries, London. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Paul’s Cross and the culture of persuasion in England, 1520-1640 / edited by Torrance Kirby, P.G. Stanwood. pages cm. -- (Studies in the history of Christian traditions, ISSN 1573-5664 ; VOLUME 171) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-90-04-24227-2 (hardback : alk. paper) -- ISBN 978-90-04-26281-2 (e-book) 1. Preaching-- England--London--History--16th century. 2. Preaching--England--London--History--17th century. 3. Sermons, English--16th century. 4. Sermons, English--17th century. 5. St. Paul’s Cathedral (London, England) 6. London (England)--Church history--16th century. 7. London (England)--Church history-- 17th century. I. Kirby, W. J.
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day

    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day

    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Biographical Sources for Archbishops of Canterbury from 1052 to the Present Day 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 3 2 Abbreviations Used ....................................................................................................... 4 3 Archbishops of Canterbury 1052- .................................................................................. 5 Stigand (1052-70) .............................................................................................................. 5 Lanfranc (1070-89) ............................................................................................................ 5 Anselm (1093-1109) .......................................................................................................... 5 Ralph d’Escures (1114-22) ................................................................................................ 5 William de Corbeil (1123-36) ............................................................................................. 5 Theobold of Bec (1139-61) ................................................................................................ 5 Thomas Becket (1162-70) ................................................................................................. 6 Richard of Dover (1174-84) ............................................................................................... 6 Baldwin (1184-90) ............................................................................................................
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted

    DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted

    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
  • Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 I I

    Xerox University Microfilms 300 North Zeeb Road Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 I I

    INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image. You will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., was part of the material being photographed the photographer followed a definite method in "sectioning" the material. It is customary to begin photoing at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue photoing from left to right in equal sections with a small overlap. If necessary, sectioning is continued again - beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. The majority of users indicate that the textual content is of greatest value, however, a somewhat higher quality reproduction could be made from "photographs" if essential to the understanding of the dissertation.
  • The Apostolic Succession of the Right Rev. James Michael St. George

    The Apostolic Succession of the Right Rev. James Michael St. George

    The Apostolic Succession of The Right Rev. James Michael St. George © Copyright 2014-2015, The International Old Catholic Churches, Inc. 1 Table of Contents Certificates ....................................................................................................................................................4 ......................................................................................................................................................................5 Photos ...........................................................................................................................................................6 Lines of Succession........................................................................................................................................7 Succession from the Chaldean Catholic Church .......................................................................................7 Succession from the Syrian-Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch..............................................................10 The Coptic Orthodox Succession ............................................................................................................16 Succession from the Russian Orthodox Church......................................................................................20 Succession from the Melkite-Greek Patriarchate of Antioch and all East..............................................27 Duarte Costa Succession – Roman Catholic Succession .........................................................................34
  • Preaching and the Reformation in Henrician Kent

    Preaching and the Reformation in Henrician Kent

    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society PREACHING AND THE REFORMATION IN HENRICIAN KENT BRIAN M. HOGBEN Some dioceses are more fortunate than others in the materials which they afford to the student of the English Reformation. A most valuable source for the diocese of Canterbury is a well-known MS volume kept in the library of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge.' Given to his college by Archbishop Matthew Parker, the volume contains three documents, presumably bound together for the archbishop himself. All are written on paper measuring, for the most part, 12+ in. by 8It in. The pagination, which is in red crayon, is thought to be in Parker's own hand. After p. 1 and its verso (unnumbered) the pages run from 5 to 441. The second of the documents, which begins at p. 365, is entitled, 'The book of the expenses of D. Cranmer, Latymer, and Ridley, for the time of their imprisonment in Oxford and of their execution'. Preceded by a letter and petition which refer to them, the accounts are dated December 1566. The third item in the volume, beginning on p. 405, is believed to have been written for Parker by Ralph Morice, Cranmer's secretary, and bears the title, 'A declaration concerning the progeny with the manner and trade of the life and bringing up of that most reverent Father in god Thomas Cranmer'. However, it is the first and longest document on which this paper is based. Untitled, it consists mainly of evidence collected in various ways during the enquiries in the summer and autumn of 1543 following the so-called Prebendaries' Plot, in which a number of conservative clergy and laity of the Canterbury diocese had conspired to denounce Archbishop Cramer to the King's Council.
  • The Historic Episcopate

    The Historic Episcopate

    THE HISTORIC EPISCOPATE By ROBERT ELLIS THOMPSON, M.A., S.T. D., LL.D. of THE PRESBYTERY of PHILADELPHIA PHILADELPHIA tEfce Wtstminmx pre** 1910 "3^70 Copyright, 1910, by The Trustees of The Presbyterian Board of Publication and Sabbath School Work Published May, 1910 <§;G!.A265282 IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACADEMIC USAGE THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED TO THE PRESIDENT, FACULTY AND TRUSTEES OF MUHLENBERG COLLEGE IN GRATEFUL RECOGNITION OF HONORS CONFERRED PREFACE The subject of this book has engaged its author's attention at intervals for nearly half a century. The present time seems propitious for publishing it, in the hope of an irenic rather than a polemic effect. Our Lord seems to be pressing on the minds of his people the duty of reconciliation with each other as brethren, and to be bringing about a harmony of feeling and of action, which is beyond our hopes. He is beating down high pretensions and sectarian prejudices, which have stood in the way of Christian reunion. It is in the belief that the claims made for what is called "the Historic Episcopate" have been, as Dr. Liddon admits, a chief obstacle to Christian unity, that I have undertaken to present the results of a long study of its history, in the hope that this will promote, not dissension, but harmony. If in any place I have spoken in what seems a polemic tone, let this be set down to the stress of discussion, and not to any lack of charity or respect for what was for centuries the church of my fathers, as it still is that of most of my kindred.
  • Archbishop of Canterbury, and One of the Things This Meant Was That Fruit Orchards Would Be Established for the Monasteries

    Archbishop of Canterbury, and One of the Things This Meant Was That Fruit Orchards Would Be Established for the Monasteries

    THE ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY And yet — in fact you need only draw a single thread at any point you choose out of the fabric of life and the run will make a pathway across the whole, and down that wider pathway each of the other threads will become successively visible, one by one. — Heimito von Doderer, DIE DÂIMONEN “NARRATIVE HISTORY” AMOUNTS TO FABULATION, THE REAL STUFF BEING MERE CHRONOLOGY “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project Archbishops of Canterb HDT WHAT? INDEX ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY 597 CE Christianity was established among the Anglo-Saxons in Kent by Augustine (this Roman import to England was of course not the Aurelius Augustinus of Hippo in Africa who had been in the ground already for some seven generations — and therefore he is referred to sometimes as “St. Augustine the Less”), who in this year became the 1st Archbishop of Canterbury, and one of the things this meant was that fruit orchards would be established for the monasteries. Despite repeated Viking attacks many of these survived. The monastery at Ely (Cambridgeshire) would be particularly famous for its orchards and vineyards. DO I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION? GOOD. Archbishops of Canterbury “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY 604 CE May 26, 604: Augustine died (this Roman import to England was of course not the Aurelius Augustinus of Hippo in Africa who had been in the ground already for some seven generations — and therefore he is referred to sometimes as “St. Augustine the Less”), and Laurentius succeeded him as Archbishop of Canterbury.
  • Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Archbishops of Canterbury – Universities Attended Abbreviations: B

    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Archbishops of Canterbury – Universities Attended Abbreviations: B

    Lambeth Palace Library Research Guide Archbishops of Canterbury – Universities attended abbreviations: b. = born. c or c. = circa. e = education. e. = educated. esp. = especially. nr. = near. s = school. (ap) = apparently. (pr) = probably. (ps) = possibly. (r) = reputedly. 105th 2013- Justin Portal Welby (b. 1956) Trinity College Cambridge BA 78; St John’s College Durham BA 91. 104th 2002-2012 Rowan Douglas Williams (b. 1950) Christ’s College Cambridge BA 71, MA 75; Wadham College, Oxford DPhil 75; DD 89. 103rd 1991-2002 George Leonard Carey (b.1935) London College of Divinity. King's College London. Associate of the London College of Divinity 1st class 1961, BD Hons 1962 (London), MTh1965 (London), PhD1971 (London). 102nd 1980-1991 Robert Alexander Kennedy Runcie (1921-2000) Brasenose College Oxford (1 year). Sandhurst (trained for Guards Armoured Division). Brasenose College Oxford. BA (1st class lit. hum) 1948, MA 1948. 101st 1974-1980 Frederick Donald Coggan (1909-2000) St John's College Cambridge. 1st class oriental languages tripos part i 1930, BA (1st class oriental languages tripos part ii), MA 1935. 100th 1961-1974 Arthur Michael Ramsey (1904-1988) Magdalene College Cambridge. 2nd class classical tripos part i 1925, BA (1st class theological tripos part i) 1927, MA1930, BD1950. 99th 1945-1961 Geoffrey Francis Fisher (1887-1972) Exeter College Oxford. 1st class classical honour moderations 1908, BA (1st class literae humaniores) 1910, 1st class theology 1911, MA1913. 98th 1942-1944 William Temple (1881-1944) Balliol College Oxford. 1st class honour moderations 1902 & literae humaniores 1904. 97th 1928-1941 William Cosmo Gordon Lang (1864-1945) Glasgow. MA. Balliol College Oxford.
  • Somerset Parish Registers. Marriages

    Somerset Parish Registers. Marriages

    942.38019 W!E^ Aalp V.6 1379239 GENEALOGY eOL LECTION ALLEN COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 3 1833 00676 1198 ) SOMERSET PARISH REGISTERS. nDarriagee, VI. PHILLIMORE S PARISH RKGISTER SERIES. VOL. VI. (SOMERSET, VOL. LIV. (Jni- hundred and fifty only printed. O. (P'^ : Somerset I ^ Parish Registers. ilDarriages. Edited by W. P. W. PHILLIMORE, M.A., B.C.L., AND W. A. BELL, Rector of Chavlynch, AND C. W. WHISTLER, M.R.C.S., Vicay of Stockland. VOL. VI. 5o XonDon Issued to the Subscribers by Phillimore & Co., 124, Chancery Lane, 1905. ^ — ^^ i s PREFACE. A sixth volume of Somerset Marriage Registers is now completed, making the total number of parishes dealt with to be forty-nine. JL37^9^39 As before, contractions have been made use of w.—widower or widow. dioc.—in the diocese of. b.—bachelor co.—in the county of. s. —spinster, single woman. lie. —marriage licence, d. —daughter. y.—yeoman, p.—of the parish of. c.—carpenter. The reader must remember that the printed volumes are not " evidence " in the legal sense. Certificates must be obtained from the local clergy in charge of the Registers. The Editors have to acknowledge the ready willingness of the Clergy in affording facilities for making the needful transcripts for the printers. Their names are given under the respective parishes. They will gladly welcome the assistance of others who may be willing to aid in transcribing Registers, for it is only by volunteer work that it is possible to print our Parish Registers. They would gladly issue two volumes in each year, and this they can do if those who have the opportunity will supply them with the needful transcriptions of the Registers.