DOCSLIB.ORG

Layout Copy 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Layout Copy 1 LONG STRUGGLE FOR TRUTH ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCES IN LIBYA 2 LONG STRUGGLE FOR TRUTH ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCES IN LIBYA ‘Libya today is not Libya of yesterday, and Libya of tomorrow, God willing, will be even better’ Saif al-Islam al-Gaddafi, son of the Libyan leader and head of the Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation, March 2010 Thousands of Libyan families are waiting for isolation. Today it is a full member of the violations committed and to apologize. answers from the Libyan authorities. They international community, elected to the UN They want accountability and assurances all have relatives who have been forcibly Human Rights Council in May 2010. Sadly, that such abuses will not be repeated. disappeared or who have been killed by the country’s international reintegration has Only then will they be able to mourn and agents of the state in past decades. Despite not been accompanied by steps to address heal, and only then will the authorities be Libya’s recent transformation from pariah the legacy of gross human rights violations able to regain their trust. state to international player, they have had committed in past decades. no satisfactory responses to their demands Far from responding to the families’ for truth and justice. Routine abuses committed in the 1970s, legitimate demands, the Libyan authorities 1980s and 1990s included arbitrary have first ignored the families and later tried Only a few years ago, Libya was a closed detentions, enforced disappearances, torture to pacify them through offering financial country under UN, European Union and and other ill-treatment, extrajudicial compensation – accepted by some families US sanctions. Gross human rights violations executions and deaths in custody. Victims but rejected by many others. The took place in a climate of secrecy and ranged from political dissidents living in authorities have not revealed the truth Libya or abroad to suspected members or about the fate of thousands of individuals MILOuD BOuShAShA supporters of armed Islamist groups. To date, who disappeared or died in the hands of the Libyan authorities refuse to acknowledge, security forces and no perpetrators have Nouri Boushasha wants to know the truth about let alone redress, the harm done. been brought to justice. In fact, some still what happened to his brother Miloud, whom he apparently hold official positions. This has not seen since his arrest in March 1989. A The relatives of the disappeared are asking climate of total impunity facilitates human group of men in civilian clothes came to the to know the fate of their loved ones and the rights violations. It also sends the message family home in Benghazi and took 23-year-old reasons why they were victimized. They that members of security forces and others Miloud away without explanation. The distraught want the authorities to recognize the responsible for gross human rights family spared no effort to locate Miloud. They violations are above the law, while victims asked local authorities and visited prisons in are outside its protection. Benghazi. All in vain. Three years after his arrest, the family heard rumours that Miloud enforced disappearance was in Abu Salim Prison. They made the long AMRAJA’ MAS’OuD FARAJ AL-KABAILI journey to Tripoli, but the prison administrators An enforced disappearance is: “ the arrest, refused to tell them anything. Eventually, they detention, abduction or any other form of Ahmed Mas’oud Faraj Al-Kabaili is still admitted that Miloud was held there, but did not deprivation of liberty by agents of the State searching for the truth about what happened to allow the family to see him. For years, the family or by persons or groups of persons acting his brother, Amraja’ Faraj Al-Kabaili, who was kept delivering food and clothing for Miloud, with the authorization, support or arrested in Ajdebia, in the northeast of Libya, in not knowing that he had been killed in June acquiescence of the State, followed by 1989. Amraja’ Faraj Al-Kabaili, father of five, 1996. Thirteen years later, in June 2009, the a refusal to acknowledge the deprivation was reportedly suspected of supporting Islamist family was given a death certifiate and offered of liberty or by concealment of the fate or armed groups. his family has obtained no news 200,000 Libyan dinars (about uS$158,000) as whereabouts of the disappeared person, about him despite requests for information from financial compensation. They refused to accept which place such a person outside the the authorities in Ajdebia and Tripoli. Years later, it until they are told the truth about why Miloud protection of the law ”. the family was given a death certificate which was arrested in the first place and why he was did not specify a cause of death, nor the exact killed in 1996. Article 2 of the International Convention for the place and date of death. Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance Amnesty International June 2010 Index: MDE 19/008/2010 LONG STRUGGLE FOR TRUTH 3 ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCES IN LIBYA © L i b y a n H u m a n R i g h t s S o l i d a r i t y A BU SALIM PRISON KILLINGS Up to 1,200 prisoners were killed in Abu Salim Prison in June 1996. This one event, for which no one has been held accountable , hangs heavy over Libya to this day. Shortly after the incident, rumours Families of victims of the Abu Salim Prison killings met with representatives of the Gaddafi circulated that a large number of detainees International Charity and Development Foundation in Benghazi in November 2009. Families were had been killed. However, the first official outspoken about their sufferings and insisted on knowing the truth about the fate of their relatives. acknowledgement of any disturbances The Gaddafi International Charity and Development Foundation called on the Libyan authorities to came eight years later, when Colonel address the killings in its latest annual report issued in December 2009. Mu’ammar al-Gaddafi, Libya’s leader, described the “tragedy” to an Amnesty © A International delegation. He said that what was happening, but they later heard m n e following an escape attempt and the killing that scores of prisoners had been killed. No s t y I of a number of guards by prisoners, the official statistics are available but according n t e r police had intervened. There was an to an organization headed by Saif al-Islam n a t i exchange of fire resulting in casualties, al-Gaddafi, the Gaddafi International Charity o n a including deaths, on both sides. and Development Foundation, there are at l least 1,167 families of victims – some of Another version is based on accounts by whom lost more than one relative. former prisoners, who described a riot sparked by appalling prison conditions on Most of those killed in Abu Salim Prison 28 June 1996. Prisoners allegedly took two were not only victims of extrajudicial guards hostage, stole keys to the cells and executions, but also victims of enforced tried to escape but were thwarted by locked disappearance. They had been arrested at gates. Security forces intervened and shot various times since 1989, and had not been randomly at prisoners who had managed seen by their families since. They were cut to leave their cells. A delegation of senior off from the outside world, denied contact security officials then arrived to negotiate with lawyers, and held unlawfully: without with prisoners’ representatives. It has been charge or trial or after grossly unfair trials. reported that during the negotiations, which A map of reform and rehabilitation institutions lasted late into the night, officials promised The Libyan authorities had refused to in Libya. The notorious Abu Salim Prison in that some of the prisoners’ demands for disclose their fate and whereabouts before Tripoli is not shown. The prison was the site of better conditions would be met. the Abu Salim Prison killings took place. up to 1,200 killings in two hours on the After June 1996, they denied the killings. morning of 29 June 1996. The prison is However, the next morning, former In fact, many families continued to bring believed to be controlled by the Internal prisoners said they heard an explosion food and clothes to the prison gates until Security Agency, an intelligence body, rather followed by shootings which lasted some the early 2000s believing that their relatives than the judicial police which has the two hours. At the time, they did not know were still alive. responsibility for prisons. Index: MDE 19/008/2010 Amnesty International June 2010 4 LONG STRUGGLE FOR TRUTH ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCES IN LIBYA © ‘They [the Libyan authorities] A P Libyan leader, Colonel Mu’ammar al-Gaddafi, P h acknowledged to an Amnesty International stole the happiness from the life o t o / A delegation in 2004 that there had been of a whole family.’ b d e disturbances in Abu Salim Prison in June l Mohamed hamil, whose three brothers died in the custody of M 1996. This was the first time in eight years a g the Libyan authorities i d that the Libyan authorities admitted that an A l F incident had occurred. To date, no independent e r g investigation has taken place into the killings a n y and families are still waiting for an explanation by the Libyan authorities. FROM DENIAL TO PROMISES MOhAMED hAMIL AhMED For years the authorities categorically Mohamed hamil has three brothers who died in Ahmed [not his real name] was called in for denied that any killings took place in Abu custody: Khaled, Saleh and Sanoussi hamil questioning by the Internal Security Agency Salim Prison in 1996.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United Nations A/HRC/17/44
    United Nations A/HRC/17/44 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 January 2012 Original: English Human Rights Council Seventeenth session Agenda item 4 Human rights situation that require the Council’s attention Report of the International Commission of Inquiry to investigate all alleged violations of international human rights law in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya* Summary Pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution S-15/1 of 25 February 2011, entitled “Situation of human rights in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya”, the President of the Human Rights Council established the International Commission of Inquiry, and appointed M. Cherif Bassiouni as the Chairperson of the Commission, and Asma Khader and Philippe Kirsch as the two other members. In paragraph 11 of resolution S-15/1, the Human Rights Council requested the Commission to investigate all alleged violations of international human rights law in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, to establish the facts and circumstances of such violations and of the crimes perpetrated and, where possible, to identify those responsible, to make recommendations, in particular, on accountability measures, all with a view to ensuring that those individuals responsible are held accountable. The Commission decided to consider actions by all parties that might have constituted human rights violations throughout Libya. It also considered violations committed before, during and after the demonstrations witnessed in a number of cities in the country in February 2011. In the light of the armed conflict that developed in late February 2011 in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya and continued during the Commission‟s operations, the Commission looked into both violations of international human rights law and relevant provisions of international humanitarian law, the lex specialis that applies during armed conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Violent Extremism and Insurgency in Libya: a Risk Assessment
    VIOLENT EXTREMISM AND INSURGENCY IN LIBYA: A RISK ASSESSMENT JULY 1, 2013 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Guilain Denoeux, Management Systems International. VIOLENT EXTREMISM AND INSURGENCY IN LIBYA: A RISK ASSESSMENT Contracted under AID-OAA-TO-11-00051 Democracy and Governance and Peace and Security in the Asia and Middle East This paper was written by Dr. Guilain Denoeux, Professor of Government at Colby College and Senior Associate at Management Systems International. Dr. Denoeux is an expert on the comparative politics of the Middle East, democratization and violent extremism, and co-authored (with Dr. Lynn Carter) the USAID Guide to the Drivers of Violent Extremism (2009). DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms .................................................................................................................................... i Map ........................................................................................................................................... iii Executive Summary....................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 4 Spring 2012-Spring 2013 VE Highlights
    [Show full text]
  • Libya's Civil War, 2011
    Factsheet : Libya’s Civil War, 2011 Factsheet Series No. 123, Created: May 2011, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East What triggered protests in Libya in early 2011? Protests in Libya began on January 14, in the eastern town of al-Bayda over housing conditions. 1 The February 15 arrest of a human rights activist representing the families of victims of the Abu Salim prison massacre (see below) sparked protests by 500-600 people February 16 in the city of Benghazi, also in eastern Libya. On February 17, police killed 15 Benghazi protesters during a large organized protest. The army’s elite 32 nd Brigade, commanded by Muammar Gaddafi’s son Khamis, swept into Bayda and Benghazi February 17-18, killing dozens of people, sparking outrage and even larger protests. Protesters’ initial demands then morphed into calls for Gaddafi’s ouster. Benghazi remains a rebel stronghold. What are the protesters’ larger grievances? Regional disparities in the distribution of the benefits of oil revenues. Although most of Libya’s proven oil and gas reserves lie in eastern Libya, it has long been neglected in favour of the western province around Tripoli, the capital. According to a leaked US embassy cable, Gaddafi deliberately pursued policies to “keep the east poor.” Half of the men aged 18 to 34 in eastern Libya are unemployed, according to a local source quoted in the cable. 2 Periodic uprisings in eastern Libya have also been sharply suppressed over the years, intensifying resentment of Gaddafi there.3 Gross human rights violations. Gaddafi’s Libya has a history of gross human rights violations which remain unpunished and largely unacknowledged by the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghosts of the Past: the Muslim Brotherhood and Its Struggle for Legitimacy in Post‑Qaddafi Libya
    Ghosts of the Past: The Muslim Brotherhood and its Struggle for Legitimacy in post‑Qaddafi Libya Inga Kristina Trauthig ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author of this paper is Inga Kristina Trauthig. She wishes to thank Emaddedin Badi for his review and invaluable comments and feedback. The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own. CONTACT DETAILS For questions, queries and additional copies of this report, please contact: ICSR King’s College London Strand London WC2R 2LS United Kingdom T. +44 20 7848 2098 E. [email protected] Twitter: @icsr_centre Like all other ICSR publications, this report can be downloaded free of charge from the ICSR website at www.icsr.info. © ICSR 2018 Rxxntxxgrxxtxxng ISIS Sxxppxxrtxxrs xxn Syrxx: Effxxrts, Prxxrxxtxxs xxnd Chxxllxxngxxs Table of Contents Key Terms and Acronyms 2 Executive Summary 3 1 Introduction 5 2 The Muslim Brotherhood in Libya pre-2011 – Persecuted, Demonised and Dominated by Exile Structures 9 3 The Muslim Brotherhood’s Role During the 2011 Revolution and the Birth of its Political Party – Gaining a Foothold in the Country, Shrewd Political Manoeuvring and Punching above its Weight 15 4 The Muslim Brotherhood’s Quest for Legitimacy in the Libyan Political Sphere as the “True Bearer of Islam” 23 5 Conclusion 31 Notes and Bibliography 35 1 Key Terms and Acronyms Al-tajammu’-u al-watanī – Arabic for National Gathering or National Assembly GNA – Government of National Accord GNC – General National Council Hizb al-Adala wa’l-Tamiyya – JCP in Arabic HSC – High State Council Ikhwān – Arabic for
    [Show full text]
  • Origins of the Libyan Conflict and Options for Its Resolution
    ORIGINS OF THE LIBYAN CONFLICT AND OPTIONS FOR ITS RESOLUTION JONATHAN M. WINER MAY 2019 POLICY PAPER 2019-12 CONTENTS * 1 INTRODUCTION * 4 HISTORICAL FACTORS * 7 PRIMARY DOMESTIC ACTORS * 10 PRIMARY FOREIGN ACTORS * 11 UNDERLYING CONDITIONS FUELING CONFLICT * 12 PRECIPITATING EVENTS LEADING TO OPEN CONFLICT * 12 MITIGATING FACTORS * 14 THE SKHIRAT PROCESS LEADING TO THE LPA * 15 POST-SKHIRAT BALANCE OF POWER * 18 MOVING BEYOND SKHIRAT: POLITICAL AGREEMENT OR STALLING FOR TIME? * 20 THE CURRENT CONFLICT * 22 PATHWAYS TO END CONFLICT SUMMARY After 42 years during which Muammar Gaddafi controlled all power in Libya, since the 2011 uprising, Libyans, fragmented by geography, tribe, ideology, and history, have resisted having anyone, foreigner or Libyan, telling them what to do. In the process, they have frustrated the efforts of outsiders to help them rebuild institutions at the national level, preferring instead to maintain control locally when they have it, often supported by foreign backers. Despite General Khalifa Hifter’s ongoing attempt in 2019 to conquer Tripoli by military force, Libya’s best chance for progress remains a unified international approach built on near complete alignment among international actors, supporting Libyans convening as a whole to address political, security, and economic issues at the same time. While the tracks can be separate, progress is required on all three for any of them to work in the long run. But first the country will need to find a way to pull back from the confrontation created by General Hifter. © The Middle East Institute The Middle East Institute 1319 18th Street NW Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • 416 Kb, 82 Pages
    January 2006 Volume 18, No. 1(E) Words to Deeds The Urgent Need for Human Rights Reform I. Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 II. Methodology............................................................................................................................. 5 III. Recommendations.................................................................................................................. 7 Regarding the People’s Court ................................................................................................. 7 Regarding the Death Penalty................................................................................................... 8 Regarding Political Prisoners...................................................................................................8 Regarding Freedom of Expression ........................................................................................ 8 Regarding Freedom of Association........................................................................................ 9 Regarding Torture..................................................................................................................... 9 Regarding the Draft Penal Code............................................................................................. 9 Regarding the Committee to Investigate the 1996 Deaths in Abu Salim Prison............ 9 Regarding International Human Rights Treaties ...............................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Justice and the Rule Of
    LIBYA AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL SUBMISSION FOR THE UN UNIVERSAL PERIODIC REVIEW 22ND SESSION OF THE UPR WORKING GROUP, MAY 2014 FOLLOW UP TO THE PREVIOUS REVIEW In its first Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in 2010, Libya accepted 66 recommendations, rejected 24 and gave no clear position on a further 30 recommendations.1 Following the 2011 armed conflict that toppled the rule of Colonel Muammar al-Gaddafi, Libya formed a committee to revise its previous positions. In a welcome step, Libya accepted a further 47 recommendations in 2012.2 However, despite their public commitment, successive governments since 2011 have failed to ensure accountability for human rights abuses, which are perpetrated by the state, state-affiliated militias and armed groups at an alarming scale. Libya accepted in principle a recommendation to commute all existing death sentences and establish a moratorium on the use of the death penalty as a first step towards its abolition, but to date has not done so. 3 Regrettably, Libya has refused to “amend or repeal legislation that applies the death penalty to non-serious crimes”.4 It continues to be prescribed for a wide range of offences, including those related to the peaceful exercise of the rights to freedom of expression and association. Amnesty International welcomes Libya’s commitment to bring the security forces under legal oversight in compliance with international human rights standards.5 However, since 2011, the authorities have not been able to disband militias that have operated with little state oversight and perpetrated serious human rights abuses with impunity. 6 Libya also accepted recommendations to repeal laws that criminalize the peaceful exercise of the rights to freedom of expression, assembly and association.7 However, since 2011, the authorities have prosecuted and detained individuals for peacefully expressing their views under existing legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on Libya: Detailed Findings * **
    A/HRC/31/CRP.3 Distr.: General 15 February 2016 English only Human Rights Council Thirty-first session Agenda items 2 and 10 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Technical assistance and capacity-building Investigation by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on Libya: detailed findings * ** Summary The present document contains the detailed findings of the investigation by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on Libya. The principal findings and recommendations of OHCHR are provided in document A/HRC/31/47. * Reproduced as received. ** The information contained in this present document should be read in conjunction with the report of the investigation of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on Libya (A/HRC/31/47 ). A/HRC/31/CRP.3 Contents Page I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Mandate ................................................................................................................................... 3 B. Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 3 C. Challenges and constraints ....................................................................................................... 5 D. Acknowledgements
    [Show full text]
  • A/Hrc/31/Crp.3
    A/HRC/31/CRP.3 Distr.: General 23 February 2016 English only Human Rights Council Thirty-first session Agenda items 2 and 10 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Technical assistance and capacity-building Investigation by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on Libya: detailed findings* ** Summary The present document contains the detailed findings of the investigation by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) on Libya. The principal findings and recommendations of OHCHR are provided in document A/HRC/31/47. * Reproduced as received. ** The information contained in this present document should be read in conjunction with the report of the investigation of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights on Libya (A/HRC/31/47). GE.16-02797(E) *1602797* A/HRC/31/CRP.3 Contents Page I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Mandate ................................................................................................................................... 3 B. Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 3 C. Challenges and constraints ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 'Libya of Tomorrow'
    ’ ? r w s o t o f f h r e o g i p r r o a o h n y a t b m a m i h o u l ‘ t w h ‘libya of tomorrow’ what hope for human rights? amnesty international amnesty international is a global movement of 2.8 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human rights and other international human rights standards. we are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. amnesty international Publications first published in 2010 by amnesty international Publications international secretariat Peter benenson House 1 easton street london wC1X 0Dw United Kingdom www.amnesty.org © amnesty international Publications 2010 index: mDe 19/007/2010 original language: english Printed by amnesty international, international secretariat, United Kingdom all rights reserved. this publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. the copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. for copying in any other circumstances, or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. Cover photo : families of victims of the abu salim Prison killings of 1996 continue to demand truth, justice and reparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Libya: End Long Wait for Justice for Victims of Abu Salim Prison Killing
    AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC STATEMENT Index: MDE 19/006/2014 27 June 2014 Libya: End long wait for justice for victims of Abu Salim Prison killing Eighteen years on since the Abu Salim Prison killing, in which around 1,200 prisoners are believed to have been extrajudicially executed, Amnesty International is urging the Libyan authorities to end the victims’ families’ long wait for truth, justice and reparations. In the early morning of 29 June 1996, hundreds of men held in four different blocs of the Abu Salim Prison, located in a suburb of the Libyan capital Tripoli, were taken out into courtyards, and then shot dead by gunmen who were standing on rooftops. Such was their punishment for having rioted a day earlier, on 28 June, in protest at being held without charge or trial in poor detention conditions, in which they were denied medical treatment and family visits. The riot is said to have started during food distribution when two guards were taken hostage by several prisoners. Unable to open one of the iron gates, the prisoners failed to escape from the prison. Security forces retaliated by allegedly shooting randomly and killing several prisoners. Soon after, a delegation headed by the then Head of Intelligence, Abdallah al-Senussi, came to the prison urging all prisoners to go back to their cells. Facing refusal, the delegation was forced to negotiate over the prisoners’ demands to be brought before a judge, access medical treatment and receive family visits. The riot reportedly ended once Abdallah al-Senussi appeared to agree to their demands, and sick prisoners were taken out of the blocs.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Protest in North Africa and the Middle East (V): Making Sense of Libya
    POPULAR PROTEST IN NORTH AFRICA AND THE MIDDLE EAST (V): MAKING SENSE OF LIBYA Middle East/North Africa Report N°107 – 6 June 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... i I. INTRODUCTION: THE UPRISING .............................................................................. 1 II. THE NATURE OF QADDAFI’S REGIME ................................................................... 6 A. THE EARLY YEARS ...................................................................................................................... 6 B. THE JAMAHIRIYA AND THE ROLE OF IDEOLOGY ........................................................................... 7 C. THE FORMAL POLITICAL SYSTEM ................................................................................................ 8 D. INFORMAL POWER NETWORKS................................................................................................... 10 1. The Men of the Tent .................................................................................................................. 10 2. The Revolutionary Committees Movement ............................................................................... 10 3. Tribes and “Social People’s Leaderships” ................................................................................. 11 E. QADDAFI’S FAMILY ................................................................................................................... 12 F. THE ROLE OF PATRONAGE
    [Show full text]