The London Gazette of TUESDAY, the Ist of JUNE, 1948 Published By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The London Gazette of TUESDAY, the Ist of JUNE, 1948 Published By TOumb, 38308 3289 SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette Of TUESDAY, the ist of JUNE, 1948 published by Registered as a newspaper WEDNESDAY, 2 JUNE/1948 -THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE BRITISH PACIFIC FLEET TO THE . ASSAULT ON OKINAWA, 1945. The following Despatch was submitted to the and help of all were invaluable to our success, Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty on the a result which I know is most satisfactory to jth June, 1945, by Admiral Sir Bruce A. them. Eraser, G.C.B., K.B.E., Commander-in- 6. We shall not, however, be able to play our Chief, British Pacific Fleet. full part until sufficient forces are available to Office of the Commander-in-Chief, form a second task group, since the effort of British Pacific Fleet. one, alternatively striking and re-fuelling, must yth June, 1945. necessarily be discontinuous and uneconomical of force. " ICEBERG "—REPORT. 7. The British Pacific Fleet have been making British naval history by operating off the enemy Be pleased to lay before Their Lordships a coast for periods up to 30 days each, but it is report on the actions fought by the British well to remember that similar American task Pacific Fleet during the first phases of Opera- groups are doing the same thing for twice as tion " Iceberg." long. When we have mastered the technique 2. It is impossible yet to judge the effect of of ammunitioning and storing at sea, we shall these operations on the conquest of Okinawa, also be able to do .this. .These are matters but I consider that we have successfully carried receiving close attention. out our undertakings, employing a method of 8. In this connection, I wish to commend sea warfare with which we were previously most whole-heartedly the work of Rear-Admiral unfamiliar. D. B. Fisher, C.B., C.B.E., whose successful 3. It is not less than was expected, since all servicing of the Fleet at sea and in harbour has had turned their minds to it, but the credit been the admiration of all. must go to Vice-Admiral Sir Bernard Rawlings, •(Signed) BRUCE FRASER, K.C.B., O.B.E., whose inspiring leadership, Admiral. resolution and fine judgment were responsible. 4. Doubt as to our ability to operate in the Office of the Vice-Admiral, Pacific manner was somewhat naturally in Second-in-Command, American minds. This, however, was soon British Pacific Fleet, •changed. The toll taken by the suicide bomber SIR, gth May, 1945. of the more lightly armoured American carriers I have the honour to forward for your in- led to an increase in the proportionate effort formation reports of proceedings from the ships provided by our carriers, and the evidence of of the British Pacific Fleet which participated American eyes that we could support ourselves in the initial stages of Operation " Iceberg " logistically, relieved their anxieties on that score. We have now, I am sure', 'become not for the period from 26th March until 2oth April, only welcome but necessary in Central Pacific together with a general narrative of events for •operations. this period.* This latter duplicates inevitably Admiralty footnote :— • 5. Despite their doubts, the Americans put * Reports of proceedings of individual ships are not their trust in us unstintedly, and the generosity being reproduced. 59683 32QO SUPPLEMENTED THE LONDON GAZETTE, 2 JUNE, 1948 many of the events and remarks made in the these • American authorities responsible for the enclosures but is designed to present an overall provision and movements of Lifeguard Sub- and brief picture. marines* and aircraft: I know too that what 2. The successful capture of Okinawa, as a their units have accomplished is no 'less a source stepping stone~bn the way to the overthrow of of pleasure to them than it is to us. I am very the Japanese Empire, was 'appreciated as of grateful for their work. paramount importance, and it was in. conse- " .. .1 have the,honour to be,. Sir, quence a matter of great satisfaction to .'all in . Your obedient Servant, the two Forces, 57 and 112, that the former (Signed) .BERNARD RAWLiNGsr was able, in however small a degree, to draw Vice-Adm&aL a little of the enemy fire from those American The Commander, * '• Forces destined to bear the brunt of the attack United States Fifth Fleet. in these initial stages of the operation. It is hoped that, by their efforts in this area, any major staging of Japanese aircraft to the critical INTRODUCTION TO NARRATIVE. scene of operations was impeded. The resources Allied Object. • - of the Rear-Admiral, Fleet Train Task Force 1. The first objective of Operation " Iceberg " 112 on which we depend for logistic support are was to capture Okinawa Gunto and, gaining in some matters still somewhat embryonic: T control of the Nansei Shoto area, use them to have reason to believe that he.stretched them attack the main islands of Japan with their considerably to keep my Force-operating. sea and air approaches. 3. Although the. period under review 'Was B.P..F. Object. quiet and the enemy hard to find, those attacks 2. The particular object assigned to the British which did develop gave us valuable experience Pacific Fleet was to neutralise-the airfields in and revealed several flaws in our organisation the Sakishima Gunto as continuously, and for as which diligence, time and additional resources long as possible. - will remedy. Accurate assessments of the damage inflicted by our strikes was often diffi- Assignment of B.P.F. cult to determine; this was in part due to the 3. On I4th March, 1945, the British Pacific enemy's skilful use of dummy, aircraft, Fleet was situated as follows: — camouflage and dispersal. Most of Task. Force 113 (consisting of the ' 4. The difficulty of aircraft recognition when ist Battle Squadron, ist Aircraft Carrier friendly and enemy planes are in the vicinity Squadron, 4th Cruiser Squadron, 25th, 4th . of the Fleet is an ever present problem: several and 27-th Destroyer Flotillas) was at sea exer- proposals to obviate this confusion have Seen cising from Manus, Admiralty Islands. ' discussed, and, as remarked in the narrative, Task- Force 112 (ships of the Fleet Train a, solution to this appears of first importance. and Escort Vessels) was in harbour at Manus. I trust we shall find one. 4. On the forenoon of ,15th March-, whilst ist 5. The attack by suicide aircraft on the Fleet Battle Squadron and ist Aircraft Carrier demonstrates once again the importance of Squadron were exercising, the following signals fighter interception 'being carried out at the were received: — maximum possible range. CTF 713 (R) CTF 112 6. It has been unusual, during my generation, From C.-in-C., B.P.F. for a British Fleet of. this size to remain at COMINCHf directs you to report Task sea for the'length of time covered by this report Force 113 for,, duty "Iceberg" operations and I had beforehand found myself wondering together with Task Force 112 to C.-in-C., at times what shortcomings • in personnel and Pacific, t material it would discover. Over the' latter the TF 113 (R) TF 112 necessary steps are in hand; as regards the From C.-in-C., B.P.F. former, whilst certain adjustments and additions . TF 113 and '±12 must be employed in such to complement will be asked for, I am satisfied manner that they can be reallocated on 7 with the way in which the Fleet adapted itself days' notice from OOMINCH. to the new conditions. 5. On receipt of these signals all exercises 7. This report, dealing as it does with an were cancelled and Task Force 113 ordered into, unfinished operation, is of an interim nature harbour to top up with fuel, ammunition, only. It will not, however, be out of place to stores, and to embark the aircraft squadrons . remark on the helpfulness , of the American which had been landed for training ashore. authorities both at Manirs and Ulithi; I trust we After considering all factors the following signal did not ask for their assistance until we were was despatched: — faced with problems which frankly seemed beyond us, but whenever we did so appeal it C IN C PAC CTF ii2.C.-in-.C., B.P.F.' . was responded to with the utmost vigour. I ... From .CTF .113 would further add that the Communication Have recalled ships and am embarking air Liaison Teams in all ships have lived up to their squadrons from sea and shore training name in its best sense, and I am very conscious exercises. , (f both of the specialist help given me personally TF 113 and! 112, in accordance with orders by the Senior Communication Officer:iri my Flag- from C.-in-C., British Pacific Fleet, are.here- ship, Lieutenant, Commander R. F. Morris, by reported for duty. TF 113 with'units of U.S.N.R., as<also in general by Captain E. C. Admiralty footnotes :— " ... Eweri, U.S.N. His", knowledge and views have * Lifeguard Submarines—submarines employed for been most valuable. — . rescue of crews of aircraft." • - t COMINCH—C.-in-C., U.S. Fleets (Admiral King, JJ. I have yet to find a more helpful and re- U.S.N.). • . • . sponsive, attitude than that accorded to me by I C.-in-C., Pacific—Admiral Nimitz,' U.S.N. SUPPLEMENT TO. THE LONDON GAZETTE, 2 JUNE, 1948 32QI 112 will be ready to sail from Manus at 1200, 12. The British Pacific Fleet, until then iTth March and will join the United States Task Force 113, sailed from Ulithi at 0630 on forces under your command with feelings of 23rd March, 1945, as Task Force 57.
Recommended publications
  • British Pacific Fleet, 1945
    British Pacific Fleet 1945 Battleships HMS DUKE OF YORK (C-in-C, BPF): CAPT A.D.Nicholl, CBE, DSO HMS KING GEORGE V (VA 2 in C): CAPT B.B.Schofield, CBE HMS ANSON: CAPT A.C.G.Madden HMS HOWE: CAPT H.W.U.McCall, DSO Fleet Aircraft Carriers HMS VICTORIOUS: Rear Admiral M.M.Denny, CB, C8E HMS FORMIDABLE: CAPT W.G.Andrewes, CBE, DSO HMS INDEFATIGABLE: CAPT Q.D.Graham, CBE, DSO HMS INDOMITABLE: CAPT J.A.S.Eccles, CBE HMS IMPLACABLE: CAPT C.C.Hughes-Hallett, CBE Light Fleet Aircraft Carriers HMS COLOSSUS: CAPT G.H.Stokes, CB, DSC HMS GLORY: CAPT A.W.Buzzard, DSO, OBE HMS VENERABLE: CAPT W.A.Dallmeyer, DSO HMS VENGEANCE: CAPT D.M.L.Neame, DSO Escort Aircraft Carriers HMS STRIKER: CAPT W.P.Carne HMS ARBITER: CAPT D.H.Everett, DSO, MBE HMS CHASER: CAPT R.G.Poole HMS RULER: CAPT H.P.Currey, OBE HMS SLINGER: LCDR J.G.Hopkins HMS SPEAKER: CAPT U.H.R.James HMS VINDEX: CDR J.D.L.Williams, DSC HMS REAPER: CDR I.T.Clark, OBE Cruisers HMS BERMUDA: CAPT J.S.Bethell, CBE HMS BELFAST: CAPT R.M.Dick, CBE, DSC HMS EURYALUS: CAPT R.S.Warne, CBE HMS GAMBIA (N.Z.manned): CAPT R.A.B.Edwards, CBE HMS ACHILLES (N.Z.manned): CAPT F.J.Butler, MBE HMS NEWFOUNDLAND: CAPT R.W.Ravenhill, CBE, DSC HMS BLACK PRINCE: CAPT G.V.Gladstone HMS ONTARIO (RCN): CAPT H.T.W.Grant, DSO, RCN HMS SWIFTSURE: CAPT P.V.McLaughlin HMS ARGONAUT: CAPT W.P.McCarthy Fast Minelayers HMS APOLLO: CAPT L.N.Brownfield HMS ARIADNE: CAPT F.B.Lloyd, OBE HMS MANXMAN: CAPT G.Thistleton-Smith, GM Destroyer Depot Ships HMS TYNE: CAPT S.Boucher HMS MONTCLARE: CAPT G.W.Hoare-Smith Destroyers HMS QUADRANT:
    [Show full text]
  • Reginald James Morry's Memoirs of WWII
    THE MORRY FAMILY WEBSITE -- HTTP://WEB.NCF.CA/fr307/ World War II Memoirs of Reginald James Morry Including an eyewitness account of the sinking of the German battleship “Bismarck”. Reginald James Morry 10/6/2007 Edited by C. J. Morry Following long standing Newfoundland maritime tradition, when hostilities broke out at the beginning of WWII, Reginald James Morry chose to serve in the “Senior Service”, the Royal Navy. This is his personal account of those momentous years, including one of the most crucial naval battles of the war, the sinking of the German battleship “Bismarck”. © Reginald James Morry; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; 2007 World War II Memoirs of Reginald James Morry (then Able Seaman R. Morry P/SSX 31753) Including an eyewitness account of the sinking of the German battleship “Bismarck”. Newfoundland’s Military Legacy Newfoundland participated in both World Wars. Even though the province is small, it produced a famous Regiment of Infantry that fought in Gallipolis and from there to France. They lost quite a few men in Turkey and were decimated twice in France, once in Beaumont Hamel and again at Arras and other areas on the Somme. Total casualties (fatal) were 1305, and at sea 179 lost their lives. Of those that returned, many died of wounds, stress, and worn out hearts. They were given the title “Royal” for their role in the defence of Masnieres (the Battle for Cambrai) by King George VI, the reigning Monarch of the time. World War II is practically dead history, especially since some anti-Royals disbanded the regiment in 2002, as it's territorial section, according to the present army regime in HQ Ottawa, did not measure up!! During WWII the British changed the regiment over to Artillery so they became known as The Royal Newfoundland Light Artillery to lessen the chances of heavy losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Hirohito's War - Carriers Summary
    HIROHITO'S WAR - CARRIERS SUMMARY JAPANESE FLEET CARRIERS* CLASS LAID DOWN COMMISSION ARMAMENT LENGTH/ BEAM/DISPLACEMENT DECK/ELEVATORS CREW ENGINES MAX. SPEED SERVICE HISTORY COMMANDERS Kaga Tosa/battleship hull 19.7.1920 30.11.1929 90 aircraft 812 feet/106 feet/ 38,200 Long Tons Teak Plank/3 1708 4 Shaft Kampon geared turbines, 8 Boilers, 95,000 kW 15 knots Pearl Harbor, Rabaul, Darwin, Dutch East Indies, Indian Ocean, Sunk at Battle of Midway: 4.12.1942 Akagi Akagi 6.12.1920 25.3.1927 66+25 reserve 855,000 feet/102 feet/ 36,500 Long Tons Teak Plank/3 1630 4 Shaft, 4 Kampon geared steam turbines, 31.5 knots Pearl Harbor, Rabaul, Darwin, Dutch East Indies, Indian Ocean, Sunk at Battle of Midway: 4.12.1942 Soryu Soryu 20.11.1934 23.12.1935 63+9 746 feet/69 feet/ Teak Plank/3 1,100 4 Shafts, 8 Kampon water-tube boilers, 4 geared turbines 34 knots Pearl Harbor, Wake,Ambon, Darwin, Java, Palau, Borneo, Ceylon, Sunk at Battle of Midway: 4.12.1942 Hiryu Soryu/Hiryu 8.7.1936 5.7.1939 64+9 746 feet/ 73 feet/ 17,300 Long Tons Teak Plank/3 1,100 4 Shafts, 8 Kampon water-tube boilers, 4 geared turbines 34 knots Pearl Harbor, Wake,Ambon, Darwin, Java, Palau, Borneo, Ceylon, Sunk at Battle of Midway: 4.12.1942 Shokaku Shokaku 12.12.1937 8.8.1941 72+12 844 feet/85 feet/ Teak Plank/3 1,660 4 Shafts, 8 Kampon geared steam turbines, 8 boilers 34.2 knots Pearl Harbor, Indian Ocean, Coral Sea, Battles of East Solomons, Santa Cruz Islands, Philipinnes Sea - Sunk at this Battle: 19.6.1944 Zuikaku Shokaku 25.5.1938 25.9.1941 72+12 844 feet/85 feet/ Teak Plank/3
    [Show full text]
  • Hms Victorious 1966-1967
    VICTORIOUS, 1965-67 3 Foreword Throughout her long and vigorous life Victorious has had an enviable reputation as a happy, efficient and hard-hitting carrier. The commission of 1966-67 has matched and added to this record. The quality of the commission had already been established by September, 1966 when I relieved Captain Davenport and it was my good fortune to take command of a smoothly running fighting ship manned by a cheerfully capable Ship's Company. This condition can only be achieved and sustained by hard work, consideration for others, a degree of self-denial - and indeed sacrifice - and a pride in the task and the `Ship' and Aircraft we have been given to perform it. These qualities have been present throughout and have been shown with such willing cheerfulness that this splendid command has been for me not only a great privilege but also a pleasure. During the commission Victorious has steamed nearly 100,000 miles and our aircraft have flown well over a million miles. Mixed with hard work have been some fine sporting performances and some memorable visits, in particular to my own country Australia. These pages contain a record of some of the personalities and some of our activities on board, in the air and ashore. They can be only a small part of the whole but I hope that in the years to come they will serve as reminders of this commission and will help you to recall your own memories of friends and incidents in a satisfying and rewarding commission. Good Luck to you all.
    [Show full text]
  • Cvf) Programme
    CHILD POLICY This PDF document was made available CIVIL JUSTICE from www.rand.org as a public service of EDUCATION the RAND Corporation. ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE Jump down to document6 INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS NATIONAL SECURITY The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit POPULATION AND AGING research organization providing PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY objective analysis and effective SUBSTANCE ABUSE solutions that address the challenges TERRORISM AND facing the public and private sectors HOMELAND SECURITY TRANSPORTATION AND around the world. INFRASTRUCTURE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Europe View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Options for Reducing Costs in the United Kingdom’s Future Aircraft Carrier (cvf) Programme John F. Schank | Roland Yardley Jessie Riposo | Harry Thie | Edward Keating Mark V. Arena | Hans Pung John Birkler | James R. Chiesa Prepared for the UK Ministry of Defence Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research described in this report was sponsored by the United King- dom’s Ministry of Defence.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. Donald Macintyre, Narvik (London: Evans, 1959), p. 15. 2. See Olav Riste, The Neutral Ally: Norway’s Relations with Belligerent Powers in the First World War (London: Allen and Unwin, 1965). 3. Reflections of the C-in-C Navy on the Outbreak of War, 3 September 1939, The Fuehrer Conferences on Naval Affairs, 1939–45 (Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1990), pp. 37–38. 4. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 10 October 1939, in ibid. p. 47. 5. Report of the C-in-C Navy to the Fuehrer, 8 December 1939, Minutes of a Conference with Herr Hauglin and Herr Quisling on 11 December 1939 and Report of the C-in-C Navy, 12 December 1939 in ibid. pp. 63–67. 6. MGFA, Nichols Bohemia, n 172/14, H. W. Schmidt to Admiral Bohemia, 31 January 1955 cited by Francois Kersaudy, Norway, 1940 (London: Arrow, 1990), p. 42. 7. See Andrew Lambert, ‘Seapower 1939–40: Churchill and the Strategic Origins of the Battle of the Atlantic, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 17, no. 1 (1994), pp. 86–108. 8. For the importance of Swedish iron ore see Thomas Munch-Petersen, The Strategy of Phoney War (Stockholm: Militärhistoriska Förlaget, 1981). 9. Churchill, The Second World War, I, p. 463. 10. See Richard Wiggan, Hunt the Altmark (London: Hale, 1982). 11. TMI, Tome XV, Déposition de l’amiral Raeder, 17 May 1946 cited by Kersaudy, p. 44. 12. Kersaudy, p. 81. 13. Johannes Andenæs, Olav Riste and Magne Skodvin, Norway and the Second World War (Oslo: Aschehoug, 1966), p.
    [Show full text]
  • K a L E N D E R- B L Ä T T E R
    - Simon Beckert - K A L E N D E R- B L Ä T T E R „Nichts ist so sehr für die „gute alte Zeit“ verantwortlich wie das schlechte Gedächtnis.“ (Anatole France ) Stand: Januar 2016 H I N W E I S E Eckig [umklammerte] Jahresdaten bedeuten, dass der genaue Tag des Ereignisses unbekannt ist. SEITE 2 J A N U A R 1. JANUAR [um 2100 v. Chr.]: Die erste überlieferte große Flottenexpedition der Geschichte findet im Per- sischen Golf unter Führung von König Manishtusu von Akkad gegen ein nicht bekanntes Volk statt. 1908: Der britische Polarforscher Ernest Shackleton verlässt mit dem Schoner Nimrod den Ha- fen Lyttelton (Neuseeland), um mit einer Expedition den magnetischen Südpol zu erkunden (Nimrod-Expedition). 1915: Die HMS Formidable wird in einem Nachtangriff durch das deutsche U-Boot SM U 24 im Ärmelkanal versenkt. Sie ist das erste britische Linienschiff, welches im Ersten Weltkrieg durch Feindeinwirkung verloren geht. 1917: Das deutsche U-Boot SM UB 47 versenkt den britischen Truppentransporter HMT In- vernia etwa 58 Seemeilen südöstlich von Kap Matapan. 1943: Der amerikanische Frachter Arthur Middleton wird vor dem Hafen von Casablanca von dem deutschen U-Boot U 73 durch zwei Torpedos getroffen. Das zu einem Konvoi gehörende Schiff ist mit Munition und Sprengstoff beladen und versinkt innerhalb einer Minute nach einer Explosion der Ladung. 1995: Die automatische Wellenmessanlage der norwegischen Ölbohrplattform Draupner-E meldet in einem Sturm eine Welle mit einer Höhe von 26 Metern. Damit wurde die Existenz von Monsterwellen erstmals eindeutig wissenschaftlich bewiesen. —————————————————————————————————— 2. JANUAR [um 1990 v. Chr.]: Der ägyptische Pharao Amenemhet I.
    [Show full text]
  • General HMS York - OP Deference
    J Royal Naval Medical Service 2011, 97.1 28-31 General HMS York - OP Deference S Schofield In March 2010, when I left HMS ILLUSTRIOUS, eventuality had to be considered including use I was saddened at the thought of never of different ports (Benghazi/Tripoli), use of returning to a sea-going unit – but less than a different assets (coming alongside/using sea- year later I was back at sea and the following boats/using helicopter) and how to react to 10 days reminded me just why I love my job as different situations ashore (aggression and a Medical Officer in the Royal Navy…..! hostility from locals/being welcomed into On the 19 February, after months of hard Libya). There were a lot of unanswered work, HMS YORK finally set sail for her APT questions, a lot of “ifs” and a lot of “buts” but (South) Deployment. She was due a 5 day eventually a flexible plan came together. run-ashore in Las Palmas starting on In Malta, elements of HMS YORK’s Wednesday 23 February, however, on Command team went ashore to the makeshift Tuesday 22 February, twelve hours before Joint Task Force Head Quarters which had reaching Las Palmas, she received instruction been established in the High Commission to turn about and make best speed to building, and as a result our mission became Gibraltar for a different tasking; the ship was clearer; we were to embark Royal Marine to prepare for a possible Non-combatant security troops and proceed to just outside Evacuation Operation (NEO) from Libya, territorial waters off of Tripoli.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Maritime Power
    Joint Doctrine Publication 0-10 UK Maritime Power Fifth Edition Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre Joint Doctrine Publication 0-10 UK Maritime Power Joint Doctrine Publication 0-10 (JDP 0-10) (5th Edition), dated October 2017, is promulgated as directed by the Chiefs of Staff Director Concepts and Doctrine Conditions of release 1. This information is Crown copyright. The Ministry of Defence (MOD) exclusively owns the intellectual property rights for this publication. You are not to forward, reprint, copy, distribute, reproduce, store in a retrieval system, or transmit its information outside the MOD without VCDS’ permission. 2. This information may be subject to privately owned rights. i Authorisation The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre (DCDC) is responsible for publishing strategic trends, joint concepts and doctrine. If you wish to quote our publications as reference material in other work, you should confirm with our editors whether the particular publication and amendment state remains authoritative. We welcome your comments on factual accuracy or amendment proposals. Please send them to: The Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre Ministry of Defence Shrivenham SWINDON Wiltshire SN6 8RF Telephone: 01793 31 4216/4217/4220 Military network: 96161 4216/4217/4220 E-mail: [email protected] All images, or otherwise stated are: © Crown copyright/MOD 2017. Distribution Distributing Joint Doctrine Publication (JDP) 0-10 (5th Edition) is managed by the Forms and Publications Section, LCSLS Headquarters and Operations Centre, C16 Site, Ploughley Road, Arncott, Bicester, OX25 1LP. All of our other publications, including a regularly updated DCDC Publications Disk, can also be demanded from the LCSLS Operations Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Royal Navy Aircraft Carrier Deployment to the Indo-Pacific
    NIDS Commentary No. 146 The first Royal Navy aircraft carrier deployment to the Indo-Pacific since 2013: Reminiscent of an untold story of Japan-UK defence cooperation NAGANUMA Kazumi, Planning and Management Division, Planning and Administration Department No. 146, 3 January 2021 Introduction: Anticipating the UK’s theatre-wide commitment to the Indo-Pacific in 2021 On 5 December, it was reported that the UK Royal Navy aircraft carrier HMS Queen Elizabeth would deploy to the Indo-Pacific region in early 2021 and conduct training with Japan and the US.1 It is the first time in the eight years since the disaster relief operations for the Philippines affected by typhoon in November 2013, that a Royal Navy aircraft carrier will deploy to the region. It is highly possible that the UK would clarify its theatre-wide commitment to the Indo-Pacific through the deployment of a brand-new aircraft carrier. According to a previous study on the UK’s military involvement in the region, for example, in Southeast Asia, “the development of security from 2010 to 2015 is limited” and “in reality, they conducted a patchy dispatch of their vessels when required for humanitarian assistance and search and rescue”.2 However, the study overlooked that in the context of disaster relief and search and rescue of missing aircrafts, considerably substantial defence cooperation has been already promoted between Japan and the UK, resulting in a huge impact on Japan’s defense policy. Coincidently, the year of 2021 is also the 100th anniversary of the Washington Conference which decided to renounce the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, so it will be a good opportunity to look at Japan-UK defence cooperation.3 The Japan-UK Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) came into effect on 1 January 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2
    The Old Pangbournian Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society The Old angbournianP Record Volume 2 Casualties in War 1917-2020 Collected and written by Robin Knight (56-61) The Old Pangbournian Society First published in the UK 2020 The Old Pangbournian Society Copyright © 2020 The moral right of the Old Pangbournian Society to be identified as the compiler of this work is asserted in accordance with Section 77 of the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, “Beloved by many. stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any Death hides but it does not divide.” * means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior consent of the Old Pangbournian Society in writing. All photographs are from personal collections or publicly-available free sources. Back Cover: © Julie Halford – Keeper of Roll of Honour Fleet Air Arm, RNAS Yeovilton ISBN 978-095-6877-031 Papers used in this book are natural, renewable and recyclable products sourced from well-managed forests. Typeset in Adobe Garamond Pro, designed and produced *from a headstone dedication to R.E.F. Howard (30-33) by NP Design & Print Ltd, Wallingford, U.K. Foreword In a global and total war such as 1939-45, one in Both were extremely impressive leaders, soldiers which our national survival was at stake, sacrifice and human beings. became commonplace, almost routine. Today, notwithstanding Covid-19, the scale of losses For anyone associated with Pangbourne, this endured in the World Wars of the 20th century is continued appetite and affinity for service is no almost incomprehensible.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Admiralty War Staff and Its Influence on the Conduct of The
    ‘The Admiralty War Staff and its influence on the conduct of the naval between 1914 and 1918.’ Nicholas Duncan Black University College University of London. Ph.D. Thesis. 2005. UMI Number: U592637 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592637 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS Page Abstract 4 Acknowledgements 5 Abbreviations 6 Introduction 9 Chapter 1. 23 The Admiralty War Staff, 1912-1918. An analysis of the personnel. Chapter 2. 55 The establishment of the War Staff, and its work before the outbreak of war in August 1914. Chapter 3. 78 The Churchill-Battenberg Regime, August-October 1914. Chapter 4. 103 The Churchill-Fisher Regime, October 1914 - May 1915. Chapter 5. 130 The Balfour-Jackson Regime, May 1915 - November 1916. Figure 5.1: Range of battle outcomes based on differing uses of the 5BS and 3BCS 156 Chapter 6: 167 The Jellicoe Era, November 1916 - December 1917. Chapter 7. 206 The Geddes-Wemyss Regime, December 1917 - November 1918 Conclusion 226 Appendices 236 Appendix A.
    [Show full text]