DOCSLIB.ORG

Yes Gravesham Borough Council Report To: Cabinet Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Yes Gravesham Borough Council Report To: Cabinet Date Classification: Part 1 – Public Key Decision: Yes Gravesham Borough Council Report to: Cabinet Date: 10 July 2013 Reporting officer: Director (Finance & Environment) Assistant Director (Environment) Subject: Update on the Waste Collection Support Scheme Purpose and summary of report: To provide Members with an update outlining the progress made to date in respect of the Waste Collection Support Scheme project. To request Members to grant delegated authority to enable the preferred refuse and recycling service delivery option to be implemented. Recommendations: 1. Members are requested to instruct the Director (Finance & Environment) in consultation with the Leader of the Executive and the Lead Member for Community Services to take the necessary action to implement the preferred refuse and recycling service delivery option based on the work completed by officers and Eunomia Research and Consulting, taking into account the results of the various fact-finding visits made by Members and officers. 1. Background to the scheme 1.1 In February 2012, the department for Communities and Local Government (CLG) announced a £250 million fund (over a three-year period) to encourage councils to maintain weekly waste collection and improve their refuse and recycling service. The council was successful in its bid for funding and has been awarded £4,915,990 (across the three-year period) in order to implement changes to the refuse and recycling service. The table below shows how the funding is spread across the three years. 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 Total £268,553 £1,010,711 £3,636,726 £4,915,990 Cabinet – 10 July 2013 Update on the Waste Collection Support Scheme 2. Progress to date Project Groups 2.1 To help guide and control the project to ensure that the changes to the refuse and recycling service are implemented effectively, three working groups have been established as outlined below: 2.1.1 Members’ Cross-party Working Group - responsible for monitoring the progress of the project and for giving advice on the ways in which the community can be kept informed before and during the introduction of the new service. The group will also act as a ‘critical friend’ within the process, providing feedback and advice at key stages of the project. The Members of the Cross-party Working Group are: • Cllr John Burden (Chair) • Cllr Andrea Webb (Vice-chair) • Cllr Colin Caller • Cllr Senja Compton • Cllr Harold Craske • Cllr Jane Cribbon • Cllr Mick Wenban 2.1.2 Service Delivery Project Group - responsible for ensuring the successful delivery of the overall project. This includes the roll-out of the food waste scheme across the borough and the implementation of an improved method for the collection of recycling via wheeled bins or boxes. 2.1.3 Communications Project Group – responsible for the development and delivery of a communications plan to ensure the effective internal and external communication and promotion of the new refuse and recycling service. All of the groups above have been meeting over recent months in order to set the foundations for the roll-out of the refuse and recycling service in the borough and the terms of reference for the groups are attached at appendix two. Use of Consultants to inform the refuse and recycling delivery 2.2 To help ensure that the council selects the most effective service method for delivering the new refuse and recycling service for the borough, Eunomia Research & Consulting have been commissioned to conduct an ‘options appraisal’ to evaluate various different service models. This appraisal has examined six different options for how the council could deliver its refuse and recycling service, utilising different vehicles and refuse/recycling receptacles. 2.3 Five of the options have been modelled with a 180ltr bin for residual waste with a food caddie for food waste and either a 240ltr bin or kerbside boxes for recycling. The sixth option models the use of a 140ltr bin for residual waste alongside the best performing recycling option. 2.4 The use of a 180ltr bin for residual, food refuse caddie and a 240ltr bin follows other schemes recently introduced in East and Mid Kent under the Kent Waste Partnership banner. Cabinet – 10 July 2013 Update on the Waste Collection Support Scheme 2.5 The options appraisal report from Eunomia Research & Consulting is attached at appendix three. The options outlined within the consultant’s report together with their conclusions have been discussed at the Members’ Cross-party Working Group, the Management Team and the Service Delivery Project Group. Discussions have centred around: • the various operational advantages and disadvantages of each option, in particular in relation to traffic disruption caused by slower collection operations; • the sustainability advantages that all of the options bring in terms of increasing recycling levels; and • the financial implications of all options, particularly the financial advantages offered by the ‘kerbside sort’ option (option 5). 2.6 In terms of the kerbside sort option a key point of consideration has been that whilst this offers a low ‘net’ cost operation it is reliant on high income levels derived from the sale of recyclable materials. Consequently further work is being conducted by the consultant and by officers to verify prices in the various materials markets and also to gain, as far as is possible, a view on the strength and future life of those markets. 2.7 To ensure that the project can continue to progress in a timely manner over the coming months, Members are requested to give delegated authority to the Director (Finance and Environment), in conjunction with the Leader of the Executive and the Lead Member for Community Services, to take the necessary action to implement the preferred refuse and recycling service delivery option. Other areas of work 2.8 Outlined below are further areas of work currently underway to help increase recycling rates with immediate effect and to enable the project to progress most effectively. 2.8.1 Increasing availability of clear bags to residents During the last sack delivery in January/February 2013 and more recently in April/May 2013, residents were provided 30 clear bags on a roll instead of the previous 15 per roll they would normally receive. Residents will continue to receive additional recycling sacks until the recycling service is rolled-out. 2.8.2 Promotions and marketing To ensure that there is a joined-up approach to all communications and marketing work, the council has appointed Jane Packham, a specialist marketing and communications expert. This role will be funded by the grant and will add the critical communications resource and expertise required for this significant project. Cabinet – 10 July 2013 Update on the Waste Collection Support Scheme 2.8.3 Vehicle Testing Whilst Eunomia Research & Consulting have been undertaking the options appraisal, the council has tested a number of different ‘demonstrator’ vehicles on site. The vehicles have ranged in size, manufacturer and manoeuvrability. The refuse and recycling vehicle drivers have had the opportunity to test some of the vehicles both at the depot and on various collection routes in the borough. This has tested whether the vehicles are suitable from an operational point of view and has ensured that the refuse collection drivers are involved in the changes to the service. 2.8.4 Site Visits Various site visits have been made by Members and officers to look at alternative ways of delivering the refuse and recycling service. Officers from the operational side of the refuse and recycling service have undertaken visits to Spelthorne Borough Council and Epsom and Ewell Borough Council. Officers witnessed a wheeled bin and food waste collection in operation and took time to speak to officers at these councils about their experience in running these times of service. Members and officers have also made visits to Shepway District Council, Dover District Council and Bristol City Council to observe wheeled bin and kerbside sort operations in practice. 3. Background papers 3.1 Background papers pertaining to this report are: “Supporting Weekly Collections – Prospectus and bidding form for applicants ” – published by the department for Communities and Local Government “Waste Collection Support Scheme – Bid Form” – final bid document submitted to the department for Communities and Local Government. Anyone wishing to inspect background papers should, in the first place, be directed to Committee & Electoral Services who will make the necessary arrangements. Cabinet – 10 July 2013 Update on the Waste Collection Support Scheme IMPLICATIONS APPENDIX 1 Legal All Member States of the EU are required to achieve recycling and composting rates of 45% by 2015 and 50% by 2020 as contained in the revised Waste Framework Directive (rWFD) 2008. Failure to achieve these levels of performance as a nation may give rise to EU fines. The Government has legalised the passport of such fines to local authorities as contained in the Localism Act 2011. Whilst the Local Government Association achieved a better outcome in the drafting of the Act than had been originally proposed by the Government, financial risks remain for those councils that do not achieve the targets. The levels of potential fines are unknown. Finance and Under its Supporting Weekly Collections scheme, the CLG has awarded the council Value for a grant of £4,915,990 to assist the council in maintaining a weekly refuse collection Money service. The project plan for the implementation of this scheme will be used to assist in the control of the budget and spending on this project – the Service Manager (Financial Services) is a member of the officer working group responsible for implementing the project. Risk The main risk to the council, as set out in the ‘legal’ element of this appendix is in Assessment relation to the council not fulfilling its contribution to the national recycling targets for the UK.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review Borough of Gravesham/Borough of Dartford/District of Sevenoaks LOCAL GOVEHNICWT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND HEK)hT NO. LOCAL GOVKRflUEJlT BOI'NJJAHY COMMISSION FOR CHAIRMAN Mr C J Ellerton CMC MB1C Mr J U Powell PRICE FGV* Lady Aoknur lir T Brockbank DI^ Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Me B Qcholee QBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT 1. At present the New Barn residential area is split between Dartford Borough, Sevenoaks District and Gravesham Borough; the part situated in Dartford is in the parish of ^outhfleet; the part in Sevenoaks is in the parish of Longfield, whilst the part in Gravesham is unparished. On 30 November 1979» Gravesham Borough Council requested ue to review the boundaries between the districts of Gravesham, Dartford and Sevenoaks in the vicinity of New Barn. Their request was in response to representations from the New Barn Ratepayers Association for the whole of the New Barn residential area to be incorporated within Gravesham Borough. The Association based their representations on a survey of opinion which they carried out in 1978 among the residents of New Barn on the question of whether the area should be under one authority, and if so, which one. The results indicated that a majority (8?#) of residents indicating a view preferred to see New Barn under one authority and a large proportion (6990 of these considered that this should be Gravesham. 2. We noted that Kent County Council, Dartford Borough Council, Sevenoaks District Council, and Longfield Parish Council were all opposed to a review beinp undertaken at that time, although Kent County Council and Dartford BOrough Council did a^ree that the current boundaries in the New Barn area were not wholly satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment DGS
    1 Kent Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment Dartford, Gravesend, Swanley and surrounding areas co-terminus with Dartford, Gravesham & Swanley CCG The accompanying maps etc. in Appendix A should be viewed alongside this document Kent PNA 2018- DGS CCG area Final version March 2018 2 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 Transport Links ................................................................................................ 8 Pharmaceutical Services in the area ................................................................ 8 Healthy Living Pharmacies ............................................................................ 14 Housing .......................................................................................................... 15 Kent PNA 2015 – Dartford, Gravesham and Swanley area ........................... 16 Consultation ................................................................................................... 16 Conclusions and recommendations Kent PNA 2018 DGS area .................... 17 Document Version Control ............................................................................. 18 Kent PNA 2018- DGS CCG area Final version March 2018 3 Introduction This document has been written as part of the main Kent Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment (PNA) to allow judgements to be made using local data. This document should be read in conjunction with the main Kent PNA. The area consists of 3 main towns, Dartford, Gravesend
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2 Appendix J2 Envirocheck Report Part 2
    Data Suppliers A selection of organisations who provide data within this report Data Supplier Data Supplier Logo Ordnance Survey Environment Agency Scottish Environment Protection Agency The Coal Authority British Geological Survey Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Natural Resources Wales Scottish Natural Heritage Natural England Public Health England Ove Arup Peter Brett Associates Order Number: 140939997_1_1 Date: 27-Sep-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 67 of 68 Useful Contacts Contact Name and Address Contact Details 1 British Geological Survey - Enquiry Service Telephone: 0115 936 3143 Fax: 0115 936 3276 British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Email: [email protected] Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG12 5GG Website: www.bgs.ac.uk 2 Environment Agency - National Customer Contact Telephone: 03708 506 506 Centre (NCCC) Email: [email protected] PO Box 544, Templeborough, Rotherham, S60 1BY 3 Dartford Borough Council - Environmental Health Telephone: 01322 343233 Department Fax: 01322 343963 Website: www.dartford.gov.uk Civic Centre, Home Gardens, Dartford, Kent, DA1 1DR 4 Ordnance Survey Telephone: 023 8079 2000 Email: [email protected] Adanac Drive, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 0AS Website: www.ordnancesurvey.gov.uk 5 Gravesham Borough Council Telephone: 01474 564422 Fax: 01474 337546 Cygnet House, 132 Windmill Street, Gravesend, Kent, DA12 1AU Website: www.gravesham.gov.uk 6 Kent County Council - Waste Management Group Telephone: 01622 605976
    [Show full text]
  • Gravesham Tree Trail
    of the past military occupation can be seen. be can occupation military past the of Tel: 01474 33 76 00 Tweet @visit_gravesend 00 Tweet 76 33 01474 Tel: restful environment in which intriguing glimpses glimpses intriguing which in environment restful 18a St George’s Square, Gravesend DA11 0TB DA11 Gravesend Square, George’s St 18a and the statue of Pocahontas. of statue the and The pleasant riverside gardens offer visitors a a visitors offer gardens riverside pleasant The George’s Shopping Centre, close to St George’s Church Church George’s St to close Centre, Shopping George’s into the Visitor Information Centre – at the rear of St St of rear the at – Centre Information Visitor the into enter the New Tavern Fort Gardens. Fort Tavern New the enter Make the most of your visit to Gravesend by dropping dropping by Gravesend to visit your of most the Make Gordon’s statue to the south west gate, you can can you gate, west south the to statue Gordon’s Walking through the gardens, around General General around gardens, the through Walking caused by a V2 in 1944. in V2 a by caused building was demolished following an explosion explosion an following demolished was building House in the grounds of the New Tavern Fort. The The Fort. Tavern New the of grounds the in House included the New Tavern Fort. He lived in Fort Fort in lived He Fort. Tavern New the included various fortifications along the Thames which which Thames the along fortifications various the borough. He was appointed to upgrade the the upgrade to appointed was He borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of Local Authority Companies
    Appendix Two Examples of local authority companies Ashford Borough Council Ashford Borough Council established two council-run Private Sector Housing Company (which is split into two entities - A Better Choice for Property Limited and A Better Choice for Building Consultancy Limited) which operates outside of the Housing Revenue Account (HRA); they are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the council. The Council is 100% in control of Member/Shareholder decisions, including the appointment and removal of Directors and winding up of the companies. Service Level Agreements are in place with the Council regarding the use of Council staff and resources. The companies were established in April 2014 and currently comprises of 50 homes which are rented on the private rental market at true market rents. The company currently only employs one person who is the surveyor which has been appointed on commercial terms and they are not entitled to be part of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) but are entitled to a private pension. The company has its own set of accounts and its own bank account and produced group accounts at year-end. The commercial development aspect is retained within the General Fund in order to benefit from VAT. The council has a contract with the Housing Company to provide services such as maintenance. The cash flows for the company have been modelled as follows: The council draw down a loan from the PWLB which it then loans to the Trading company in order to build/establish new private sector rented housing. The trading company is then responsible for providing this housing to the customers/tenants and recovering rents and service charges.
    [Show full text]
  • Terms and Conditions
    Terms and Conditions a. Building control inspections are not a substitute for clerk of works or architect supervision. It is essentially a series of third party spot checks intended to provide reasonable confidence that work complies with the Building Regulations but not definitive proof. b. Responsibility for constructing in compliance with the Building Regulations rests with the owner who should carefully select contractors, designers, engineers and other professionals c. Structural calculations submitted as part of the application will be risk assessed to determine the level of checking required. Where an engineer is professionally qualified, has indemnity insurance and is using established design methods, these calculations may receive just a cursory check or simply be accepted d. Every effort will be made to ensure that the estimated hours for charging is consistent with the actual hours spent. Further payment may be requested should the actual service hours exceed the original estimated hours. For the purposes of this calculation, the first hour will be disregarded. This may arise where: 1. The project turns out to be more complex than anticipated and additional time is needed to check construction details, e.g. structural foundation design once soil condition fully established 2. The project is changed after initial plans check requiring addition checking time of details or calculations 3. Calculations not produced to recognised methods require additional checking/consultant input 4. The customer has requested a higher service level than quoted for 5. After risk assessment of the professionals/individuals/company involved it is decided that the design or construction requires additional checking time to ensure compliance 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Area Local Authorities Covered by Funding Provisional 2020/21
    Lead area Local authorities covered by funding Provisional 2020/21 funding allocation Adur and Worthing £421,578.00 Arun £318,817.00 Ashford £257,000.00 Babergh Babergh and Mid Suffolk (lead) £163,498.00 West Suffolk Barking and Dagenham £184,703.00 Barnet £636,845.00 Barnsley £102,900.00 Basildon £474,871.00 Basingstoke and Deane £199,850.00 Bath and North East Somerset £417,151.00 Bedford £986,915.00 Birmingham £684,666.00 Blackburn with Darwen Hyndburn BC £184,000.00 Ribble Valley BC Burnley BC Pendle BC Rossendale BC Blackpool £200,000.00 Bolton £124,997.00 Boston £385,451.00 Bournemouth, Christchurch and £1,401,333.00 Poole Bracknell Forest £356,141.00 Bradford £461,320.00 Breckland £106,500.00 Brent £827,422.00 Brighton and Hove £2,042,637.00 Bristol, City of £2,814,768.00 Bromley £103,654.00 Broxbourne £119,380.00 Buckinghamshire Aylesbury Vale £576,500.00 Wycombe Chiltern South Bucks Bury £40,000.00 Calderdale £253,945.00 Cambridge £486,457.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £229,500.00 Camden £1,327,000.00 Canterbury £584,739.00 Carlisle (lead for all Cumbrian Allerdale Borough Council £416,340.00 authorities) Barrow Borough Council Carlisle City Council Copeland Borough Council Cumbria County Council Eden District Council South Lakeland District Council Central Bedfordshire £329,938.00 Cheshire East £438,329.30 Cheshire West and Chester £731,034.00 Chichester £230,465.00 City of London £590,300.00 Colchester £296,144.00 Corby East Northamptonshire £113,000.00 Kettering Wellingborough Cornwall £1,696,467.00 County Durham £269,128.35
    [Show full text]
  • (Secen) Minutes
    South East Creative Economy Network (SECEN) Wednesday 31st March 2021, 10:30am Virtual meeting – video conference via Zoom MINUTES Attendees (as per responses to calendar invite): Mandy Hare, Gravesham BC Marc De’ath, Chelmsford City Council Katharine Stout, Focal Point Gallery (Co-Chair) (KS) Madeni Fordham, University of Sussex Joe Hill, Towner Gallery Eastbourne (Co-Chair) (JH) Melanie Powell, Rother District Council (MP) Sarah Dance, Sarah Dance Associates (Co-Chair) (SD) Michael Tymkiw, University of Essex (MT) Alastair Upton, Creative Folkestone Rebecca Hughes, Chelmsford Cultural Development Trust Alex Riley, SELEP Natalie Parsons, University of Kent Alison Fogg, Colchester BC/ Colchester Amphora Rosalind Green, Essex Book Festival Andrea Cunningham, Metal (AC) Sally Staples, East Sussex County Council (SS) Andrew Ward, Essex County Council Sarah Walters, Things Made Public Anita Tysoe, Gravesham Borough Council Scott Dolling, Southend Borough Council Beatrice Prosser-Snelling, Artswork SE Bridge (BPS) Stephen Taylor, Thurrock Council Brian Warrens, The Backstage Centre (BW) Stewart Drew, De La Warr Pavilion Camilla Cole, Hypha Studios Victoria Barrow Williams, People Dem Collective Dawn Badland, Applause Virginie Giles, Medway Council Dawn Dublin, Unveiled (DD) Deborah Shaw, Marlowe Theatre (DS) Apologies: Emma Wilcox, Creative Estuary (EW) Gurvinder Sandher, Cohesion Plus Collette Bailey, Metal Imogen Robertson, Medway City of Culture 2025 (IR) Dan Chilcott, Thurrock Council (and SECCADs) Jane Brook, Space Coworking, Rye Jillian
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authorities Involved in LAD2, Organised Into County Area Consortia for the Purpose of the Scheme
    Local Authorities involved in LAD2, organised into county area consortia for the purpose of the scheme. Bedfordshire Bedford Borough Central Bedfordshire Luton Borough Milton Keynes Berkshire Bracknell Forest Reading Slough West Berkshire Windsor & Maidenhead Wokingham Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire Council Cambridge Cambridge City East Cambridgeshire District Fenland District Council Huntingdonshire District Peterborough City Council South Cambridgeshire District East Sussex Eastbourne Borough Hastings Borough Lewes District Rother District Council Wealden District Council Essex Basildon Braintree Brentwood Borough Council Castle Point Chelmsford Colchester Epping Forest Harlow Maldon Rochford Southend on Sea Tendring Thurrock Uttlesford District Hampshire Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council East Hampshire District Council Hart District Council Rushmoor Borough Council Test Valley Borough Council Winchester City Council Hertfordshire Broxbourne Borough Dacorum Borough East Herts District Council Hertsmere Borough North Hertfordshire District St Albans City & District Stevenage Borough Three Rivers District Watford Borough Welwyn Hatfield Borough Kent Ashford Borough Council Canterbury City Council Dartford Borough Council Dover District Council Folkestone & Hythe District Council Gravesham Borough Council Maidstone Borough Council Medway Council Sevenoaks District Council Swale Borough Council Thanet District Council Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Tunbridge Wells Borough Council London Barking & Dagenham Bexley Bromley Camden City
    [Show full text]
  • Licensing and Planning Policy Committee
    Public Document Pack Legal and Democratic Services LICENSING AND PLANNING POLICY COMMITTEE Thursday 7 March 2019 at 7.30 pm Council Chamber - Epsom Town Hall The members listed below are summoned to attend the Licensing and Planning Policy Committee meeting, on the day and at the time and place stated, to consider the business set out in this agenda. Councillor Graham Dudley Councillor Chris Frost (Chairman) Councillor Rob Geleit Councillor David Reeve (Vice- Councillor Tina Mountain Chairman) Councillor Martin Olney Councillor Michael Arthur MBE Councillor Humphrey Reynolds Councillor Steve Bridger Councillor Robert Foote Yours sincerely Chief Executive For further information, please contact Sandra Dessent, tel: 01372 732121 or email: [email protected] AGENDA 1. QUESTION TIME To take any questions from members of the the Public Please note: Members of the Public are requested to inform the Democratic Servicers Officer before the meeting begins if they wish to ask a verbal question to the Committee. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Members are asked to declare the existence and nature of any Disclosable Pecuniary Interests in respect of any item of business to be considered at the meeting. 3. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING (Pages 3 - 6) The Committee is asked to confirm as a true record the Minutes of the Meeting of the Committee held on January 24 2019 (attached) and to authorise the Chairman to sign them. 4. CORPORATE PLAN: KEY PRIORITY TARGETS FOR 2019 TO 2020 (Pages 7 - 12) This report presents the Committee with its Key Priority Targets for 2019 to 2020. 5. PROGRESS ON THE LOCAL PLAN (Pages 13 - 84) The Committee is asked to note the continued forward progress being made in preparing the new Local Plan; and the contents of the Local Plan Annual Monitoring Report and agree to its publication on the Council’s website 6.
    [Show full text]
  • PELHAM WARD 0 50 100 200 Meters Date : March 2014
    CRAWLEY COURT WARREN HASTINGS COURT REGENTS COURT WEST STREET LANSDOWNE SQUARE THE MALTINGS MELBOURNE QUAY HAZARDS HOUSE BULL YARD CHURCH STREET D - Pier Road A - St George Towncentric, St Georges Centre DA11 0TB BURCH ROAD PIER ROAD STUART ROAD PICKERING HOUSE HIGH STREET CYRIL HALL COURT PRINCES STREET BATH STREET FOUNTAIN WALK CHESTNUT CLOSE KING STREET KING STREET St Mark's Church Hall, London Rd DA11 9NH NEW ROAD ROSHER HOUSE OVERCLIFFE STONE STREET LONDON ROAD ELIZABETH COURT ST.JAMES'S STREET WINDMILL STREET PARROCK STREET WINDMILL STREET ST.JAMES'S ROAD LENNOX AVENUE RAILWAY PLACEMANOR ROAD MARINA DRIVE RATHMORE ROAD ST.MARK'S AVENUE CREMORNE ROAD ST.JAMES'S AVENUE COBHAM STREET VAUXHALL CLOSE LENNOX ROAD NORMANS CLOSE DARNLEY STREET WROTHAM ROAD DARNLEY ROAD DARNLEY STREET GRANGE HOUSE ACACIA COURT SPENCER STREET GRANGE ROAD RANELAGH GARDENS CUTMORE STREET BEAUMONT DRIVE CAMBRIAN GROVE ARTHUR STREET WEST Claremont Place, Cutmore St DA11 0PS LENNOX ROAD British Red Cross Hall, Pelham Rd DA11 0HZ THE AVENUE VICTORIA AVENUE NINE ELMS GROVE WINDMILL STREET CLIFTON GROVE ST. JAMES' OAKS SHEPPY PLACE CLARENCE ROW B - Pelham Road LYDIA COTTAGES WILLIAM HOUSE TRAFALGAR ROAD STANBROOK ROADMAYFIELD ROAD LENNOX ROAD EAST FIVEASH ROAD CAMPBELL ROADBYCLIFFE MEWS PELHAM ROAD PELHAM TERRACE WINGFIELD ROAD GRANVILLE ROAD WEAVERS CLOSE HAVELOCK ROAD C - Wrotham Road HAVELOCK ROAD WINDMILL STREET DOVER ROAD EAST THE AVENUE ESSEX ROAD ESSEX ROAD TIVOLI GARDENS HUNTSMAN HOUSE WROTHAM ROAD OLD ROAD WEST DARNLEY ROAD PORTLAND ROAD MAY AVENUE OLD ROAD
    [Show full text]