DOCSLIB.ORG

(Secen) Minutes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Secen) Minutes South East Creative Economy Network (SECEN) Wednesday 31st March 2021, 10:30am Virtual meeting – video conference via Zoom MINUTES Attendees (as per responses to calendar invite): Mandy Hare, Gravesham BC Marc De’ath, Chelmsford City Council Katharine Stout, Focal Point Gallery (Co-Chair) (KS) Madeni Fordham, University of Sussex Joe Hill, Towner Gallery Eastbourne (Co-Chair) (JH) Melanie Powell, Rother District Council (MP) Sarah Dance, Sarah Dance Associates (Co-Chair) (SD) Michael Tymkiw, University of Essex (MT) Alastair Upton, Creative Folkestone Rebecca Hughes, Chelmsford Cultural Development Trust Alex Riley, SELEP Natalie Parsons, University of Kent Alison Fogg, Colchester BC/ Colchester Amphora Rosalind Green, Essex Book Festival Andrea Cunningham, Metal (AC) Sally Staples, East Sussex County Council (SS) Andrew Ward, Essex County Council Sarah Walters, Things Made Public Anita Tysoe, Gravesham Borough Council Scott Dolling, Southend Borough Council Beatrice Prosser-Snelling, Artswork SE Bridge (BPS) Stephen Taylor, Thurrock Council Brian Warrens, The Backstage Centre (BW) Stewart Drew, De La Warr Pavilion Camilla Cole, Hypha Studios Victoria Barrow Williams, People Dem Collective Dawn Badland, Applause Virginie Giles, Medway Council Dawn Dublin, Unveiled (DD) Deborah Shaw, Marlowe Theatre (DS) Apologies: Emma Wilcox, Creative Estuary (EW) Gurvinder Sandher, Cohesion Plus Collette Bailey, Metal Imogen Robertson, Medway City of Culture 2025 (IR) Dan Chilcott, Thurrock Council (and SECCADs) Jane Brook, Space Coworking, Rye Jillian Barker, Royal Opera House Jane Kilby, Wealden District Council Judith Alder, Eastbourne Cultural Group/ Full Frontal Jo Nolan, Screen South (JN) Lucy Medhurst, Ideas Test Jo Simmons, SELEP (JS) Matthew Brown, Colchester Borough Council Julia Payne, The Hub (JP) Richard Holdsworth, Chatham Historic Dockyard Katie McGown, Canterbury Christ Church University Rob West, CCSkills Keith Grimley, Gravesham Borough Council Sujun Fieldhouse, Southend Borough Council Kelly Matthews, Royal Opera House Susan Oliver, University of Essex Lisa Ricketts, Thurrock Council/ SECCADS (LR) 1. Introduction and apologies SD welcomed attendees to the Zoom meeting. Apologies noted as above. 2. Review of previous minutes/actions The minutes of the previous meeting were approved. 3. Reopening and ongoing impact of Covid-19: open feedback session JH noted this was still an uncertain time for venues with concern that opening date slips as case numbers plateau. It is difficult to know what the restrictions may be on indoor venues at this point with regards to what social distancing measures will be required and expected. As well as having a staff that have been on furlough on and off for almost a full year. DS agreed that there is uncertainty over what the opening date for indoor venues might be in actuality. Support structures for things such as childcare are not as strong so there has to be sensitivity as opening up begins. It is difficult when you sell tickets eighteen months in advance. AC added that the Estuary Festival is happening despite having to flex this with all the new conditions – this is exciting and responds to artworks in the landscape and programmes happening online. It will be interesting to see how this is taken up and responded to by participants. It was noted that the road to recovery is focussed on the hospitality industry and does not consider freelancers much – and it was noted that a significant portion of respondents to a recent survey had not accessed emergency funding. Further details on the Estuary Festival are available at www.estuaryfestival.com. Page 1 of 4 JP noted the headlines from the most recent music industry survey – freelancers, those running own businesses, and PAYE employees – we’ve run: • Respondents twice as likely as the adult population at large to have seen their work, household finances and health negatively impacted by Covid-19. • Close to 8 out of 10 have seen their income reduce, and nearly 50% say Covid-19 has more than halved their projected 2020/21 earnings. • The majority of respondents think the financial impact of Covid-19 will be long lasting, with just a third expecting their professional lives will return to normal this year. • Going forward, the main challenge for artists and freelancers is to earn enough to cover basic living costs. BW stated that they have been busy throughout the period, the biggest impact has been on clients from the music and theatre industries. But there is still a case of people holding back given significant level of investment in production. There has also been a shift of festival dates to the August bank holiday weekend, but this may become an issue as the supply chain is stretched to cover this requirement. But overall, it has been positive and other sectors can learn from the TV and film sector. JN noted that convergence of skills and opportunities should be at the forefront as we open up and that networking opportunities remain limited. There does need to be continuing reminders of the social distancing measures as people return to on-site working and may forget the new rules. Results from the BECTU survey were also noted: • 53% are not currently working, either in the creative industries or another industry; • 20% have been unable to access either of the support schemes; • 54% have lost over half their income. SD thanked those for providing this feedback and noted certain themes that have come out of this discussion on mental health, access to financial support and learning support, messaging from the Government and the sector – both to audiences and businesses, potential supply chain concerns, and local authority licensing. MP agreed on the importance of the planning licensing process in opening up and engaging local authorities on this. This has come up as an issue for Rother as there has been hold ups. There is a general issue with licenses in terms of a slight conflict between what is wanted and what will be allowed. DD noted frustration in obtaining licenses and convincing local authorities to activate those spaces. There appears to be over-caution and there is a significant opportunity for local creators to run programmes. SD thanked attendees for this feedback and noted that the SECEN Co-Chairs will continue a discussion about what they can do with this feedback. 4. Creative Estuary EW shared a presentation with the group (to be circulated with the minutes) outlining the vision of Creative Estuary and the campaign that is starting up. Estuary Festival opens on 22 May 2021 and noted that great collaboration that has taken place to make this happen. A key part of the project is promoting the infrastructure that the sector needs to grow and flourish. The Re-Generation 2031 programme continues as an innovative approach to develop the creative skills of young people agreed 16-25 in less advantaged areas of North Kent/South Essex. It was also noted that work continues with Ebbsfleet and there is a broader ambition of what garden communities can do for the creative sector. The Creative Estuary Co-Commissions will support practitioners to make and present new works, this will be delivered by a network of partners and work with local communities, working directly with local artists and creators. The first of the commissions will be delivered alongside the Estuary Festival – information on those projects can be found on the website. The next round of co-commissions will become more visible over the next few months –there is still space to develop new projects and we’re keen to hear from organisations. The project is now running until March 2023 after an additional year extension. Page 2 of 4 MT asked how the word would be spread for the placements on some of those opportunities. EW noted that the emerging producers programme will have opportunities for placements and that further opportunities will be shared on the website and via SECEN. SD reflected that this project grew out of SECEN and this is the product of what great partnership working can deliver. 5. Medway City of Culture IR updated the group on the bid. The City of Culture is a competition run by DCMS every four years. Medway is currently waiting on timeframes for the 2025 launch – the initial submission is likely to be due this summer. It is anticipated that there will be an extended judging process with an announcement of the winner at the beginning of 2022. The other 2025 competitors are Southampton, Bradford and Lancashire. This is an opportunity for the entire region which is why obtaining as many collaborations as possible is important. The Board of Trustees for the bid has been announced this week. A number of working groups have also been established around media, comms, fundraising, business engagement and community engagement – if anyone is interested to be part of these discussions contact IR. It is intended that Creative Medway would serve as the legacy vehicle for the City of Culture bid. It is also intended that young people will be at the heart of the project and there has been an extensive engagement programme that has taken place – partnering with local schools and colleges. IR stated that the benefits from a City of Culture can have a significant regional impact. The focus of work over the coming months is business engagement – with businesses invited to pledge support. Work is also to be undertaken on the potential economic impact of the project – as an example Hull’s bid added over £300m to the local economy. 6. SELEP High Streets Project AR updated the group on the exciting collaboration between SELEP and Arts Council England to explore the role of the Creative and Cultural Sector in High Streets. This project aims to develop a better understanding of, and economic modelling for, embedding cultural and creative organisations within High Streets thorough: • Alignment of data capture and impact measurement.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Progress Summary
    CLIMATE EMERGENCY PROGRESS CHECKLIST - 10 December 2019 NB. This is work in progress! We have almost certainly missed some actions. Please contact [email protected] with any news or updates. County/Authority Council Status County/Authority Council Status Brighton & Hove BRIGHTON & HOVE CITY COUNCIL DECLARED Dec 2018 KENT COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed May 2019 WEST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL Motion Passed - April 2019 Ashford Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 Adur Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Canterbury City Council DECLARED July 2019 Arun District Council DECLARED Nov 2019 Dartford Borough Council DECLARED Oct 2019 Chichester City Council DECLARED June 2019 Dover District Council Campaign in progress West Sussex Chichester District Council DECLARED July 2019 Folkestone and Hythe District Council DECLARED July 2019 Crawley Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Gravesham Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Kent Horsham District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Maidstone Borough Council DECLARED April 2019 Mid Sussex District Council Motion Passed - June 2019 Medway Council DECLARED April 2019 Worthing Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Sevenoaks District Council Motion Passed - Nov 2019 EAST SUSSEX COUNTY COUNCIL DECLARED Oct 2019 Swale Borough Council DECLARED June 2019 Eastbourne Borough Council DECLARED July 2019 Thanet District Council DECLARED July 2019 Hastings Borough Council DECLARED Dec 2018 Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council Motion Passed July 2019 East Sussex Lewes District Council DECLARED July 2019 Tunbridge
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No. Principal Area Boundary Review Borough of Gravesham/Borough of Dartford/District of Sevenoaks LOCAL GOVEHNICWT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND HEK)hT NO. LOCAL GOVKRflUEJlT BOI'NJJAHY COMMISSION FOR CHAIRMAN Mr C J Ellerton CMC MB1C Mr J U Powell PRICE FGV* Lady Aoknur lir T Brockbank DI^ Professor G E Cherry Mr K J L Newell Me B Qcholee QBE THE RT. HON. PATRICK JENKIN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT 1. At present the New Barn residential area is split between Dartford Borough, Sevenoaks District and Gravesham Borough; the part situated in Dartford is in the parish of ^outhfleet; the part in Sevenoaks is in the parish of Longfield, whilst the part in Gravesham is unparished. On 30 November 1979» Gravesham Borough Council requested ue to review the boundaries between the districts of Gravesham, Dartford and Sevenoaks in the vicinity of New Barn. Their request was in response to representations from the New Barn Ratepayers Association for the whole of the New Barn residential area to be incorporated within Gravesham Borough. The Association based their representations on a survey of opinion which they carried out in 1978 among the residents of New Barn on the question of whether the area should be under one authority, and if so, which one. The results indicated that a majority (8?#) of residents indicating a view preferred to see New Barn under one authority and a large proportion (6990 of these considered that this should be Gravesham. 2. We noted that Kent County Council, Dartford Borough Council, Sevenoaks District Council, and Longfield Parish Council were all opposed to a review beinp undertaken at that time, although Kent County Council and Dartford BOrough Council did a^ree that the current boundaries in the New Barn area were not wholly satisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment DGS
    1 Kent Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment Dartford, Gravesend, Swanley and surrounding areas co-terminus with Dartford, Gravesham & Swanley CCG The accompanying maps etc. in Appendix A should be viewed alongside this document Kent PNA 2018- DGS CCG area Final version March 2018 2 Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................... 3 Transport Links ................................................................................................ 8 Pharmaceutical Services in the area ................................................................ 8 Healthy Living Pharmacies ............................................................................ 14 Housing .......................................................................................................... 15 Kent PNA 2015 – Dartford, Gravesham and Swanley area ........................... 16 Consultation ................................................................................................... 16 Conclusions and recommendations Kent PNA 2018 DGS area .................... 17 Document Version Control ............................................................................. 18 Kent PNA 2018- DGS CCG area Final version March 2018 3 Introduction This document has been written as part of the main Kent Pharmaceutical Needs Assessment (PNA) to allow judgements to be made using local data. This document should be read in conjunction with the main Kent PNA. The area consists of 3 main towns, Dartford, Gravesend
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2 Appendix J2 Envirocheck Report Part 2
    Data Suppliers A selection of organisations who provide data within this report Data Supplier Data Supplier Logo Ordnance Survey Environment Agency Scottish Environment Protection Agency The Coal Authority British Geological Survey Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Natural Resources Wales Scottish Natural Heritage Natural England Public Health England Ove Arup Peter Brett Associates Order Number: 140939997_1_1 Date: 27-Sep-2017 rpr_ec_datasheet v53.0 A Landmark Information Group Service Page 67 of 68 Useful Contacts Contact Name and Address Contact Details 1 British Geological Survey - Enquiry Service Telephone: 0115 936 3143 Fax: 0115 936 3276 British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Email: [email protected] Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG12 5GG Website: www.bgs.ac.uk 2 Environment Agency - National Customer Contact Telephone: 03708 506 506 Centre (NCCC) Email: [email protected] PO Box 544, Templeborough, Rotherham, S60 1BY 3 Dartford Borough Council - Environmental Health Telephone: 01322 343233 Department Fax: 01322 343963 Website: www.dartford.gov.uk Civic Centre, Home Gardens, Dartford, Kent, DA1 1DR 4 Ordnance Survey Telephone: 023 8079 2000 Email: [email protected] Adanac Drive, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 0AS Website: www.ordnancesurvey.gov.uk 5 Gravesham Borough Council Telephone: 01474 564422 Fax: 01474 337546 Cygnet House, 132 Windmill Street, Gravesend, Kent, DA12 1AU Website: www.gravesham.gov.uk 6 Kent County Council - Waste Management Group Telephone: 01622 605976
    [Show full text]
  • Gravesham Tree Trail
    of the past military occupation can be seen. be can occupation military past the of Tel: 01474 33 76 00 Tweet @visit_gravesend 00 Tweet 76 33 01474 Tel: restful environment in which intriguing glimpses glimpses intriguing which in environment restful 18a St George’s Square, Gravesend DA11 0TB DA11 Gravesend Square, George’s St 18a and the statue of Pocahontas. of statue the and The pleasant riverside gardens offer visitors a a visitors offer gardens riverside pleasant The George’s Shopping Centre, close to St George’s Church Church George’s St to close Centre, Shopping George’s into the Visitor Information Centre – at the rear of St St of rear the at – Centre Information Visitor the into enter the New Tavern Fort Gardens. Fort Tavern New the enter Make the most of your visit to Gravesend by dropping dropping by Gravesend to visit your of most the Make Gordon’s statue to the south west gate, you can can you gate, west south the to statue Gordon’s Walking through the gardens, around General General around gardens, the through Walking caused by a V2 in 1944. in V2 a by caused building was demolished following an explosion explosion an following demolished was building House in the grounds of the New Tavern Fort. The The Fort. Tavern New the of grounds the in House included the New Tavern Fort. He lived in Fort Fort in lived He Fort. Tavern New the included various fortifications along the Thames which which Thames the along fortifications various the borough. He was appointed to upgrade the the upgrade to appointed was He borough.
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of Local Authority Companies
    Appendix Two Examples of local authority companies Ashford Borough Council Ashford Borough Council established two council-run Private Sector Housing Company (which is split into two entities - A Better Choice for Property Limited and A Better Choice for Building Consultancy Limited) which operates outside of the Housing Revenue Account (HRA); they are wholly-owned subsidiaries of the council. The Council is 100% in control of Member/Shareholder decisions, including the appointment and removal of Directors and winding up of the companies. Service Level Agreements are in place with the Council regarding the use of Council staff and resources. The companies were established in April 2014 and currently comprises of 50 homes which are rented on the private rental market at true market rents. The company currently only employs one person who is the surveyor which has been appointed on commercial terms and they are not entitled to be part of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) but are entitled to a private pension. The company has its own set of accounts and its own bank account and produced group accounts at year-end. The commercial development aspect is retained within the General Fund in order to benefit from VAT. The council has a contract with the Housing Company to provide services such as maintenance. The cash flows for the company have been modelled as follows: The council draw down a loan from the PWLB which it then loans to the Trading company in order to build/establish new private sector rented housing. The trading company is then responsible for providing this housing to the customers/tenants and recovering rents and service charges.
    [Show full text]
  • Terms and Conditions
    Terms and Conditions a. Building control inspections are not a substitute for clerk of works or architect supervision. It is essentially a series of third party spot checks intended to provide reasonable confidence that work complies with the Building Regulations but not definitive proof. b. Responsibility for constructing in compliance with the Building Regulations rests with the owner who should carefully select contractors, designers, engineers and other professionals c. Structural calculations submitted as part of the application will be risk assessed to determine the level of checking required. Where an engineer is professionally qualified, has indemnity insurance and is using established design methods, these calculations may receive just a cursory check or simply be accepted d. Every effort will be made to ensure that the estimated hours for charging is consistent with the actual hours spent. Further payment may be requested should the actual service hours exceed the original estimated hours. For the purposes of this calculation, the first hour will be disregarded. This may arise where: 1. The project turns out to be more complex than anticipated and additional time is needed to check construction details, e.g. structural foundation design once soil condition fully established 2. The project is changed after initial plans check requiring addition checking time of details or calculations 3. Calculations not produced to recognised methods require additional checking/consultant input 4. The customer has requested a higher service level than quoted for 5. After risk assessment of the professionals/individuals/company involved it is decided that the design or construction requires additional checking time to ensure compliance 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Lead Area Local Authorities Covered by Funding Provisional 2020/21
    Lead area Local authorities covered by funding Provisional 2020/21 funding allocation Adur and Worthing £421,578.00 Arun £318,817.00 Ashford £257,000.00 Babergh Babergh and Mid Suffolk (lead) £163,498.00 West Suffolk Barking and Dagenham £184,703.00 Barnet £636,845.00 Barnsley £102,900.00 Basildon £474,871.00 Basingstoke and Deane £199,850.00 Bath and North East Somerset £417,151.00 Bedford £986,915.00 Birmingham £684,666.00 Blackburn with Darwen Hyndburn BC £184,000.00 Ribble Valley BC Burnley BC Pendle BC Rossendale BC Blackpool £200,000.00 Bolton £124,997.00 Boston £385,451.00 Bournemouth, Christchurch and £1,401,333.00 Poole Bracknell Forest £356,141.00 Bradford £461,320.00 Breckland £106,500.00 Brent £827,422.00 Brighton and Hove £2,042,637.00 Bristol, City of £2,814,768.00 Bromley £103,654.00 Broxbourne £119,380.00 Buckinghamshire Aylesbury Vale £576,500.00 Wycombe Chiltern South Bucks Bury £40,000.00 Calderdale £253,945.00 Cambridge £486,457.00 Cambridgeshire County Council £229,500.00 Camden £1,327,000.00 Canterbury £584,739.00 Carlisle (lead for all Cumbrian Allerdale Borough Council £416,340.00 authorities) Barrow Borough Council Carlisle City Council Copeland Borough Council Cumbria County Council Eden District Council South Lakeland District Council Central Bedfordshire £329,938.00 Cheshire East £438,329.30 Cheshire West and Chester £731,034.00 Chichester £230,465.00 City of London £590,300.00 Colchester £296,144.00 Corby East Northamptonshire £113,000.00 Kettering Wellingborough Cornwall £1,696,467.00 County Durham £269,128.35
    [Show full text]
  • Local Authorities Involved in LAD2, Organised Into County Area Consortia for the Purpose of the Scheme
    Local Authorities involved in LAD2, organised into county area consortia for the purpose of the scheme. Bedfordshire Bedford Borough Central Bedfordshire Luton Borough Milton Keynes Berkshire Bracknell Forest Reading Slough West Berkshire Windsor & Maidenhead Wokingham Buckinghamshire Buckinghamshire Council Cambridge Cambridge City East Cambridgeshire District Fenland District Council Huntingdonshire District Peterborough City Council South Cambridgeshire District East Sussex Eastbourne Borough Hastings Borough Lewes District Rother District Council Wealden District Council Essex Basildon Braintree Brentwood Borough Council Castle Point Chelmsford Colchester Epping Forest Harlow Maldon Rochford Southend on Sea Tendring Thurrock Uttlesford District Hampshire Basingstoke & Deane Borough Council East Hampshire District Council Hart District Council Rushmoor Borough Council Test Valley Borough Council Winchester City Council Hertfordshire Broxbourne Borough Dacorum Borough East Herts District Council Hertsmere Borough North Hertfordshire District St Albans City & District Stevenage Borough Three Rivers District Watford Borough Welwyn Hatfield Borough Kent Ashford Borough Council Canterbury City Council Dartford Borough Council Dover District Council Folkestone & Hythe District Council Gravesham Borough Council Maidstone Borough Council Medway Council Sevenoaks District Council Swale Borough Council Thanet District Council Tonbridge & Malling Borough Council Tunbridge Wells Borough Council London Barking & Dagenham Bexley Bromley Camden City
    [Show full text]
  • Licensing and Planning Policy Committee
    Public Document Pack Legal and Democratic Services LICENSING AND PLANNING POLICY COMMITTEE Thursday 7 March 2019 at 7.30 pm Council Chamber - Epsom Town Hall The members listed below are summoned to attend the Licensing and Planning Policy Committee meeting, on the day and at the time and place stated, to consider the business set out in this agenda. Councillor Graham Dudley Councillor Chris Frost (Chairman) Councillor Rob Geleit Councillor David Reeve (Vice- Councillor Tina Mountain Chairman) Councillor Martin Olney Councillor Michael Arthur MBE Councillor Humphrey Reynolds Councillor Steve Bridger Councillor Robert Foote Yours sincerely Chief Executive For further information, please contact Sandra Dessent, tel: 01372 732121 or email: [email protected] AGENDA 1. QUESTION TIME To take any questions from members of the the Public Please note: Members of the Public are requested to inform the Democratic Servicers Officer before the meeting begins if they wish to ask a verbal question to the Committee. 2. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Members are asked to declare the existence and nature of any Disclosable Pecuniary Interests in respect of any item of business to be considered at the meeting. 3. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING (Pages 3 - 6) The Committee is asked to confirm as a true record the Minutes of the Meeting of the Committee held on January 24 2019 (attached) and to authorise the Chairman to sign them. 4. CORPORATE PLAN: KEY PRIORITY TARGETS FOR 2019 TO 2020 (Pages 7 - 12) This report presents the Committee with its Key Priority Targets for 2019 to 2020. 5. PROGRESS ON THE LOCAL PLAN (Pages 13 - 84) The Committee is asked to note the continued forward progress being made in preparing the new Local Plan; and the contents of the Local Plan Annual Monitoring Report and agree to its publication on the Council’s website 6.
    [Show full text]
  • PELHAM WARD 0 50 100 200 Meters Date : March 2014
    CRAWLEY COURT WARREN HASTINGS COURT REGENTS COURT WEST STREET LANSDOWNE SQUARE THE MALTINGS MELBOURNE QUAY HAZARDS HOUSE BULL YARD CHURCH STREET D - Pier Road A - St George Towncentric, St Georges Centre DA11 0TB BURCH ROAD PIER ROAD STUART ROAD PICKERING HOUSE HIGH STREET CYRIL HALL COURT PRINCES STREET BATH STREET FOUNTAIN WALK CHESTNUT CLOSE KING STREET KING STREET St Mark's Church Hall, London Rd DA11 9NH NEW ROAD ROSHER HOUSE OVERCLIFFE STONE STREET LONDON ROAD ELIZABETH COURT ST.JAMES'S STREET WINDMILL STREET PARROCK STREET WINDMILL STREET ST.JAMES'S ROAD LENNOX AVENUE RAILWAY PLACEMANOR ROAD MARINA DRIVE RATHMORE ROAD ST.MARK'S AVENUE CREMORNE ROAD ST.JAMES'S AVENUE COBHAM STREET VAUXHALL CLOSE LENNOX ROAD NORMANS CLOSE DARNLEY STREET WROTHAM ROAD DARNLEY ROAD DARNLEY STREET GRANGE HOUSE ACACIA COURT SPENCER STREET GRANGE ROAD RANELAGH GARDENS CUTMORE STREET BEAUMONT DRIVE CAMBRIAN GROVE ARTHUR STREET WEST Claremont Place, Cutmore St DA11 0PS LENNOX ROAD British Red Cross Hall, Pelham Rd DA11 0HZ THE AVENUE VICTORIA AVENUE NINE ELMS GROVE WINDMILL STREET CLIFTON GROVE ST. JAMES' OAKS SHEPPY PLACE CLARENCE ROW B - Pelham Road LYDIA COTTAGES WILLIAM HOUSE TRAFALGAR ROAD STANBROOK ROADMAYFIELD ROAD LENNOX ROAD EAST FIVEASH ROAD CAMPBELL ROADBYCLIFFE MEWS PELHAM ROAD PELHAM TERRACE WINGFIELD ROAD GRANVILLE ROAD WEAVERS CLOSE HAVELOCK ROAD C - Wrotham Road HAVELOCK ROAD WINDMILL STREET DOVER ROAD EAST THE AVENUE ESSEX ROAD ESSEX ROAD TIVOLI GARDENS HUNTSMAN HOUSE WROTHAM ROAD OLD ROAD WEST DARNLEY ROAD PORTLAND ROAD MAY AVENUE OLD ROAD
    [Show full text]
  • Mid Year Population Estimates
    Statistical Bulletin July 2021 2020 Mid-Year Population Estimates: Total population of Kent authorities Related This bulletin presents the 2020 Mid-Year documents Population Estimates (2011 Census based) The Population and as published by the Office for National Census web page Statistics on 25 June 2021. contains more information which you may find useful. Summary of findings Population forecasts • Kent’s population grew by 7,500 people (0.47%) presents the latest between 2019 and 2020 which was equal to the thinking about future national rate of growth and higher than South East population levels. average. 2011 Census provides • This annual rate of population growth is lower than the information of the previous year when Kent’s population grew by 12,900 characteristics of the people (0.82.9%) between 2018 and 2019. population. • Kent remains England’s largest non-metropolitan NOTE: within this bulletin ’Kent’ refers to the Kent county with a resident population of 1,589,100 people County Council (KCC) area in mid-2020. which excludes Medway • There are 4.5 people per hectare in Kent, making Kent Further Information less densely populated than the regional average (4.8) Kent Analytics but slightly higher than the national average (4.3). Kent County Council • Maidstone has the largest population of all Kent local Invicta House Maidstone authority districts with a population of 173,100 in mid- Kent 2020 whilst Gravesham has the smallest population ME14 1XX with 106,900 people. • Dartford is Kent’s most densely populated local Email: authority district with 15.7 people per hectare and [email protected] Ashford is the least densely populated district (2.3 persons per hectare).
    [Show full text]