Possible Baryonychid Dinosaur Teeth from the Wessex Formation (Lower

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Possible Baryonychid Dinosaur Teeth from the Wessex Formation (Lower Possible b aryonychid dinosaur t eeth f rom the W essex F ormation (Lower C retaceous, B arremian) of the Isle of Wight, England David M . Martill* and S teve Ruut MARTILL, D . M . & HUTT, S . 1 996. Possible b aryonychid dinosaur t eeth f rom the W essex F ormation (Lower C retaceous, B arremian) o f the I sle o f W ight, England. P roceedings of the G eologists ' Association, 107, 8 1-84. Isolated, l aterally c ompressed, recurved t eeth o f theropod d inosaurs f rom the Wessex F ormation ( Barremian) of the I sle o f W ight are d istinguished f rom o ther theropod t eeth b y t heir finely d enticulate carinae and b y lingual and l abial l ongitudinal f aceting. T hese t eeth are c omparable with t hose o f Baryonyx walkeri C harig & Milner 1986 and are t entatively assigned t o the e nigmatic theropod f amily B aryonychidae. * Department ofGeology, U niversity ofPortsmouth, P ortsmouth pal 3QL. t Museum ofIsle ofWight Geology, Sandown, I sle of Wight P036 8 AF. 1. INTRODUCTION Dinosaur remains are abundant i n the clays and sandstones of the W essex F ormation, Wealden Group, of the southern coast o f the I sle o f W ight. England (see B enton & Spencer, 1995 for a r eview of Wealden G roup reptile l ocalities) (Fig. I). The a rea has b ecome f amous for b oth the abundance and diversity of its dinosaur fauna w hich includes the ornithopods Hypsilophodon, Valdosaurus, and Iguanodon (Sues & Norman, 1 991; N orman & Weishampel, 1991), the ankylosaur Polacanthus (Blows, 1 987), the b rachiosaur sauropods Pelerosaurus and Chondrosteosaurus (Mclntosh, 199 1), a diplodocid sauropod (Charig, 1980) and t heropods. Until r ecently, t heropods f rom the I sle o fW ight w ere r epre- sented only b y isolated b ones and t eeth. Isolated t eeth h ave usually b een referred t o Megalosaurus sp., w hile a syn- sacrum, originally thought t o b elong t o a p terosaur, and named Ornithodesmus, has b een shown to be f rom a maniraptoran theropod. possibly with affinities to the Troodontidae (Howse & Milner, 1993). Lydekker (1988) referred f ive isolated theropod tooth crowns (BMNH R21O) from the I sle of Wight to Megalosaurus dunkeri Dames, but later considered that they might be referred to Megalosaurus oweni Lydekker (Lydekker, 1890). As M. oweni is based on a right metatarsus. these teeth cannot be referred to this taxon. Additionally, M. dunkeri is based on an isolated and worn tooth from the Wealden of Germany, and should be considered as a nomen dubium. Bones of the pelvic region and lumbar vertebrae of a theropod from Brook, Isle of Wight were made the type of Aristosuchus pusillus (Owen), and a number of other specimens were also referred to this taxon (Lydekker, 1888), mostly without justification. A number of names were erected last century for small Isle of Wight theropods on the basis of isolated vertebrae, including Calamo- spondylus foxi Lydekker based on two cervical vertebrae Proceedings ofthe Geologists ' Association. 107, 81-84. and Thecocoelurus daviesi (Seeley) b ased o n a n i ncomplete cervical v ertebra. Apart from the type material of Aristosuchus pusillus and Ornithodesmus c luniculus all o f the I sle o f W ight theropod material i s i nadequate for sensible generic d etermination. For a r eview o f the e arly history o f the I sle o f W ight d inosaurs and t heir c ollectors a detailed account can b e f ound i n Swinton (1936). More recently the remains o f a l arge and e xceptionally well p reserved a llosaurid skeleton h ave b een r ecovered. This specimen i s c urrently b eing prepared and i s u nder study b y one o f the authors. P reservation o f b one i n the Wessex F ormation i s o ften excellent and has b een the subject of a r ecent t aphonomic study (Clarke & Barker, 1993). The purpose of t his p aper is t o describe a n umber of iso- lated theropod teeth from the W essex Formation w hich were examined during a search for Spinosaurus teeth. The t eeth dinosaur-bearing Wealden Group. Possible baryonychid teeth have been found at the localities arrowed. 0016-7878/96 $07·00 ©1996 Geologists' Association 82 D. M. MARTILL in question are held in the Isle of Wight Museum of Geology. Accession numbers IWCMS 3642; 5 120; 5122; 1995,207; 1995,208; 1995,209. In addition, a seventh tooth also f rom the W essex Formation of the I sle of Wight is held in the collection of the Geology D epartment of the University of P ortsmouth, accession n umber U 0P97. 2. I SLE OF W IGHT THEROPOD TEETH Two dental m orphotypes considered t o b elong t o f1esh- eating dinosaurs o ccur i n the W essex F ormation of the I sle of W ight. B oth m orphotypes are usually e ncountered as isolated crowns, and h ave usually suffered some d amage due e ither t o p ost-mortem effects, or, in m any cases as a result o f w ear d uring o cclusion. E ven i n s pecimens w ith post-mortem damage, d etail offine structure i s often visible as theropod t eeth are r elatively r esistant t o abrasion (Argast, Farlow, Gebet & Brinkman, 1987). The f irst m orphotype is l aterally c ompressed, recurved w ith smooth lingual and l abial sides, and has coarsely d enticulate carinae (serrations) b oth a nteriorly and p osteriorly. I n the p ast, i t has b een c ommon practice t o r efer t o t his t ooth t ype a s megalosaurid (or e ven for t hem t o b e p laced i n the g enus Megalosaurus). Indeed, historically. m any species of Megalosaurus w ere erected o n the b asis o f t eeth a lone (see Waldman, 1 974). The r ecent d iscovery o f a n a llosaurid i n the Wealden o f the I sle o f W ight w ith t his t ooth t ype s hows that such isolated t eeth can n o l onger b e p laced i n Megalosaurus w ith any c onfidence, and t his practice s hould stop u ntil i t can b e d emonstrated t hat M egalosaurus t eeth can be distinguished f rom the t eeth o f all o ther theropod genera. I t remains t o b e e stablished w hat t ype o f t eeth were p ossessed b y O rnithodesmus, the o ther I sle o f W ight theropod. The s econd t ooth m orphotype, and the m ain subject of this p aper, i s similar i n overall s hape t o t hat o f m ost theropod t eeth, but i s c haracterized b y h aving l ongitudinal fluting o n the l abial and lingual s urfaces, and b y h aving very f ine d enticles o n the anterior and p osterior carinae (Fig. 2). The s pecimens d escribed h ere are not w ell localized, but r WCMS 3 642 was f ound a t Y averland. IWCMS 5 120 was f ound a t Hanover P oint ( Fig. I). 3. D ESCRIPTION Teeth varying i n c rown h eight between 1 8 and 4 4 mm, w ith anteroposterior d imension a t the b ase o f the c rown between 8 and 2 3 m m (in the current s ample s et; n o minimum o r maximum s ize i s i nferred). C rown g ently p osteriorly flexed, labial and lingual surface o f c rown w ith l ongitudinal faceting, s ometimes i n l arge s pecimens becoming m inor carinae r ootwards ( Fig. 3). L abial and lingual surface may b e f inely rugose, e specially towards b ase o f c rown. Cross-section o val, enhanced b y p ossession o f anterior and posterior carinae. Carinae f inely d enticulate ( serrated) w ith seven t o e ight d enticles per m illimetre ( Fig. 3). R oot not known b eyond a few m illimetres b elow the c rown. & S. HUTT a b c d Fig. 2 . Possible b aryonychid t eeth: (a) I WCMS 5 122, complete tooth c rown i n lateral v iew, x I ; (b) I WCMS 1 995/208, i ncomplete tooth c rown and r oot i n lateral v iew showing l ongitudinal r idges and faceting o f ?lingual surface, x 1 .25; (c) I WCMS 3 642, t ooth crown i n lateral v iew w ith o cclusion w ear f acets ( arrowed), x 1.8; (d) s ame t ooth a s (a) a bove i n anterior v iew showing proximal carina, x 1.5. Root/crown boundary may b e obvious and i rregular (Fig. 2). 4. A FFINITIES Historically m any dinosaur t axa w ere b ased o n isolated teeth, a practice w hich, happily, i s d ying o ut.
Recommended publications
  • International Code of Zoological Nomenclature
    International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature INTERNATIONAL CODE OF ZOOLOGICAL NOMENCLATURE Fourth Edition adopted by the International Union of Biological Sciences The provisions of this Code supersede those of the previous editions with effect from 1 January 2000 ISBN 0 85301 006 4 The author of this Code is the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature Editorial Committee W.D.L. Ride, Chairman H.G. Cogger C. Dupuis O. Kraus A. Minelli F. C. Thompson P.K. Tubbs All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise), without the prior written consent of the publisher and copyright holder. Published by The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 1999 c/o The Natural History Museum - Cromwell Road - London SW7 5BD - UK © International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature 1999 Explanatory Note This Code has been adopted by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature and has been ratified by the Executive Committee of the International Union of Biological Sciences (IUBS) acting on behalf of the Union's General Assembly. The Commission may authorize official texts in any language, and all such texts are equivalent in force and meaning (Article 87). The Code proper comprises the Preamble, 90 Articles (grouped in 18 Chapters) and the Glossary. Each Article consists of one or more mandatory provisions, which are sometimes accompanied by Recommendations and/or illustrative Examples. In interpreting the Code the meaning of a word or expression is to be taken as that given in the Glossary (see Article 89).
    [Show full text]
  • Early Cretaceous) Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, Southern England
    A new albanerpetontid amphibian from the Barremian (Early Cretaceous) Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, southern England STEVEN C. SWEETMAN and JAMES D. GARDNER Sweetman, S.C. and Gardner, J.D. 2013. A new albanerpetontid amphibian from the Barremian (Early Cretaceous) Wes− sex Formation of the Isle of Wight, southern England. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 58 (2): 295–324. A new albanerpetontid, Wesserpeton evansae gen. et sp. nov., from the Early Cretaceous (Barremian) Wessex Formation of the Isle of Wight, southern England, is described. Wesserpeton is established on the basis of a unique combination of primitive and derived characters relating to the frontals and jaws which render it distinct from currently recognized albanerpetontid genera: Albanerpeton (Late Cretaceous to Pliocene of Europe, Early Cretaceous to Paleocene of North America and Late Cretaceous of Asia); Celtedens (Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous of Europe); and Anoualerpeton (Middle Jurassic of Europe and Early Cretaceous of North Africa). Although Wesserpeton exhibits considerable intraspecific variation in characters pertaining to the jaws and, to a lesser extent, frontals, the new taxon differs from Celtedens in the shape of the internasal process and gross morphology of the frontals in dorsal or ventral view. It differs from Anoualerpeton in the lack of pronounced heterodonty of dentary and maxillary teeth; and in the more medial loca− tion and direction of opening of the suprapalatal pit. The new taxon cannot be referred to Albanerpeton on the basis of the morphology of the frontals. Wesserpeton currently represents the youngest record of Albanerpetontidae in Britain. Key words: Lissamphibia, Albanerpetontidae, microvertebrates, Cretaceous, Britain. Steven C.
    [Show full text]
  • Dino Cards Project D E F List B
    Daanosaurus Efraasia Dacentrurus Einiosaurus "Dachongosaurus" – nomen nudum Ekrixinatosaurus Daemonosaurus Elachistosuchus – a rhynchocephalian Dahalokely Elaltitan Dakosaurus – a metriorhynchid crocodilian Elaphrosaurus Dakotadon Elmisaurus Dakotaraptor Elopteryx - nomen dubium Daliansaurus Elosaurus – junior synonym of Brontosaurus "Damalasaurus" – nomen nudum Elrhazosaurus Dandakosaurus - nomen dubium "Elvisaurus" – nomen nudum; Cryolophosaurus Danubiosaurus – junior synonym of Struthiosaurus Emausaurus "Daptosaurus" – nomen nudum; early manuscript name for Deinonychus Embasaurus - theropoda incertae sedis Darwinsaurus - possible junior synonym of Huxleysaurus Enigmosaurus Dashanpusaurus Eoabelisaurus Daspletosaurus Eobrontosaurus – junior synonym of Brontosaurus Dasygnathoides – a non-dinosaurian archosaur, junior synonym Eocarcharia of Ornithosuchus Eoceratops – junior synonym of Chasmosaurus "Dasygnathus" – preoccupied name, now known as Dasygnathoides Eocursor Datanglong Eodromaeus Datonglong "Eohadrosaurus" – nomen nudum; Eolambia Datousaurus Eolambia Daurosaurus – synonym of Kulindadromeus Eomamenchisaurus Daxiatitan Eoplophysis - Dinosauria indet. Deinocheirus Eoraptor Deinodon – possibly Gorgosaurus Eosinopteryx - Avialae Deinonychus Eotrachodon Delapparentia - probable junior synonym of Iguanodon Eotriceratops Deltadromeus Eotyrannus Demandasaurus Eousdryosaurus Denversaurus Epachthosaurus Deuterosaurus – a therapsid Epanterias – may be Allosaurus Diabloceratops "Ephoenosaurus" – nomen nudum; Machimosaurus (a crocodilian) Diamantinasaurus
    [Show full text]
  • Brains and Intelligence
    BRAINS AND INTELLIGENCE The EQ or Encephalization Quotient is a simple way of measuring an animal's intelligence. EQ is the ratio of the brain weight of the animal to the brain weight of a "typical" animal of the same body weight. Assuming that smarter animals have larger brains to body ratios than less intelligent ones, this helps determine the relative intelligence of extinct animals. In general, warm-blooded animals (like mammals) have a higher EQ than cold-blooded ones (like reptiles and fish). Birds and mammals have brains that are about 10 times bigger than those of bony fish, amphibians, and reptiles of the same body size. The Least Intelligent Dinosaurs: The primitive dinosaurs belonging to the group sauropodomorpha (which included Massospondylus, Riojasaurus, and others) were among the least intelligent of the dinosaurs, with an EQ of about 0.05 (Hopson, 1980). Smartest Dinosaurs: The Troodontids (like Troödon) were probably the smartest dinosaurs, followed by the dromaeosaurid dinosaurs (the "raptors," which included Dromeosaurus, Velociraptor, Deinonychus, and others) had the highest EQ among the dinosaurs, about 5.8 (Hopson, 1980). The Encephalization Quotient was developed by the psychologist Harry J. Jerison in the 1970's. J. A. Hopson (a paleontologist from the University of Chicago) did further development of the EQ concept using brain casts of many dinosaurs. Hopson found that theropods (especially Troodontids) had higher EQ's than plant-eating dinosaurs. The lowest EQ's belonged to sauropods, ankylosaurs, and stegosaurids. A SECOND BRAIN? It used to be thought that the large sauropods (like Brachiosaurus and Apatosaurus) and the ornithischian Stegosaurus had a second brain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revised Taxonomy of the Iguanodont Dinosaur Genera and Species
    ARTICLE IN PRESS + MODEL Cretaceous Research xx (2007) 1e25 www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes A revised taxonomy of the iguanodont dinosaur genera and species Gregory S. Paul 3109 North Calvert Station, Side Apartment, Baltimore, MD 21218-3807, USA Received 20 April 2006; accepted in revised form 27 April 2007 Abstract Criteria for designating dinosaur genera are inconsistent; some very similar species are highly split at the generic level, other anatomically disparate species are united at the same rank. Since the mid-1800s the classic genus Iguanodon has become a taxonomic grab-bag containing species spanning most of the Early Cretaceous of the northern hemisphere. Recently the genus was radically redesignated when the type was shifted from nondiagnostic English Valanginian teeth to a complete skull and skeleton of the heavily built, semi-quadrupedal I. bernissartensis from much younger Belgian sediments, even though the latter is very different in form from the gracile skeletal remains described by Mantell. Currently, iguanodont remains from Europe are usually assigned to either robust I. bernissartensis or gracile I. atherfieldensis, regardless of lo- cation or stage. A stratigraphic analysis is combined with a character census that shows the European iguanodonts are markedly more morpho- logically divergent than other dinosaur genera, and some appear phylogenetically more derived than others. Two new genera and a new species have been or are named for the gracile iguanodonts of the Wealden Supergroup; strongly bipedal Mantellisaurus atherfieldensis Paul (2006. Turning the old into the new: a separate genus for the gracile iguanodont from the Wealden of England. In: Carpenter, K. (Ed.), Horns and Beaks: Ceratopsian and Ornithopod Dinosaurs.
    [Show full text]
  • Pterosaur Distribution in Time and Space: an Atlas 61
    Zitteliana An International Journal of Palaeontology and Geobiology Series B/Reihe B Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Staatssammlung für Pa lä on to lo gie und Geologie B28 DAVID W. E. HONE & ERIC BUFFETAUT (Eds) Flugsaurier: pterosaur papers in honour of Peter Wellnhofer CONTENTS/INHALT Dedication 3 PETER WELLNHOFER A short history of pterosaur research 7 KEVIN PADIAN Were pterosaur ancestors bipedal or quadrupedal?: Morphometric, functional, and phylogenetic considerations 21 DAVID W. E. HONE & MICHAEL J. BENTON Contrasting supertree and total-evidence methods: the origin of the pterosaurs 35 PAUL M. BARRETT, RICHARD J. BUTLER, NICHOLAS P. EDWARDS & ANDREW R. MILNER Pterosaur distribution in time and space: an atlas 61 LORNA STEEL The palaeohistology of pterosaur bone: an overview 109 S. CHRISTOPHER BENNETT Morphological evolution of the wing of pterosaurs: myology and function 127 MARK P. WITTON A new approach to determining pterosaur body mass and its implications for pterosaur fl ight 143 MICHAEL B. HABIB Comparative evidence for quadrupedal launch in pterosaurs 159 ROSS A. ELGIN, CARLOS A. GRAU, COLIN PALMER, DAVID W. E. HONE, DOUGLAS GREENWELL & MICHAEL J. BENTON Aerodynamic characters of the cranial crest in Pteranodon 167 DAVID M. MARTILL & MARK P. WITTON Catastrophic failure in a pterosaur skull from the Cretaceous Santana Formation of Brazil 175 MARTIN LOCKLEY, JERALD D. HARRIS & LAURA MITCHELL A global overview of pterosaur ichnology: tracksite distribution in space and time 185 DAVID M. UNWIN & D. CHARLES DEEMING Pterosaur eggshell structure and its implications for pterosaur reproductive biology 199 DAVID M. MARTILL, MARK P. WITTON & ANDREW GALE Possible azhdarchoid pterosaur remains from the Coniacian (Late Cretaceous) of England 209 TAISSA RODRIGUES & ALEXANDER W.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaurs British Isles
    DINOSAURS of the BRITISH ISLES Dean R. Lomax & Nobumichi Tamura Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett (Natural History Museum, London) Skeletal reconstructions by Scott Hartman, Jaime A. Headden & Gregory S. Paul Life and scene reconstructions by Nobumichi Tamura & James McKay CONTENTS Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett.............................................................................10 Foreword by the authors........................................................................................11 Acknowledgements................................................................................................12 Museum and institutional abbreviations...............................................................13 Introduction: An age-old interest..........................................................................16 What is a dinosaur?................................................................................................18 The question of birds and the ‘extinction’ of the dinosaurs..................................25 The age of dinosaurs..............................................................................................30 Taxonomy: The naming of species.......................................................................34 Dinosaur classification...........................................................................................37 Saurischian dinosaurs............................................................................................39 Theropoda............................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in Later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica
    Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous Asiamerica Journal: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Manuscript ID cjes-2020-0174.R1 Manuscript Type: Article Date Submitted by the 04-Jan-2021 Author: Complete List of Authors: Holtz, Thomas; University of Maryland at College Park, Department of Geology; NationalDraft Museum of Natural History, Department of Geology Keyword: Dinosaur, Ontogeny, Theropod, Paleocology, Mesozoic, Tyrannosauridae Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Tribute to Dale Russell Issue? : © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Page 1 of 91 Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 1 Theropod Guild Structure and the Tyrannosaurid Niche Assimilation Hypothesis: 2 Implications for Predatory Dinosaur Macroecology and Ontogeny in later Late Cretaceous 3 Asiamerica 4 5 6 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. 7 8 Department of Geology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA 9 Department of Paleobiology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC 20013 USA 10 Email address: [email protected] 11 ORCID: 0000-0002-2906-4900 Draft 12 13 Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. 14 Department of Geology 15 8000 Regents Drive 16 University of Maryland 17 College Park, MD 20742 18 USA 19 Phone: 1-301-405-4084 20 Fax: 1-301-314-9661 21 Email address: [email protected] 22 23 1 © The Author(s) or their Institution(s) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Page 2 of 91 24 ABSTRACT 25 Well-sampled dinosaur communities from the Jurassic through the early Late Cretaceous show 26 greater taxonomic diversity among larger (>50kg) theropod taxa than communities of the 27 Campano-Maastrichtian, particularly to those of eastern/central Asia and Laramidia.
    [Show full text]
  • The Giant Pliosaurid That Wasn't—Revising the Marine Reptiles From
    The giant pliosaurid that wasn’t—revising the marine reptiles from the Kimmeridgian, Upper Jurassic, of Krzyżanowice, Poland DANIEL MADZIA, TOMASZ SZCZYGIELSKI, and ANDRZEJ S. WOLNIEWICZ Madzia, D., Szczygielski, T., and Wolniewicz, A.S. 2021. The giant pliosaurid that wasn’t—revising the marine reptiles from the Kimmeridgian, Upper Jurassic, of Krzyżanowice, Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 66 (1): 99–129. Marine reptiles from the Upper Jurassic of Central Europe are rare and often fragmentary, which hinders their precise taxonomic identification and their placement in a palaeobiogeographic context. Recent fieldwork in the Kimmeridgian of Krzyżanowice, Poland, a locality known from turtle remains originally discovered in the 1960s, has reportedly provided additional fossils thought to indicate the presence of a more diverse marine reptile assemblage, including giant pliosaurids, plesiosauroids, and thalattosuchians. Based on its taxonomic composition, the marine tetrapod fauna from Krzyżanowice was argued to represent part of the “Matyja-Wierzbowski Line”—a newly proposed palaeobiogeographic belt comprising faunal components transitional between those of the Boreal and Mediterranean marine provinces. Here, we provide a de- tailed re-description of the marine reptile material from Krzyżanowice and reassess its taxonomy. The turtle remains are proposed to represent a “plesiochelyid” thalassochelydian (Craspedochelys? sp.) and the plesiosauroid vertebral centrum likely belongs to a cryptoclidid. However, qualitative assessment and quantitative analysis of the jaws originally referred to the colossal pliosaurid Pliosaurus clearly demonstrate a metriorhynchid thalattosuchian affinity. Furthermore, these me- triorhynchid jaws were likely found at a different, currently indeterminate, locality. A tooth crown previously identified as belonging to the thalattosuchian Machimosaurus is here considered to represent an indeterminate vertebrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Microvertebrates of the Lourinhã Formation (Late Jurassic, Portugal)
    Alexandre Renaud Daniel Guillaume Licenciatura em Biologia celular Mestrado em Sistemática, Evolução, e Paleobiodiversidade Microvertebrates of the Lourinhã Formation (Late Jurassic, Portugal) Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Mestre em Paleontologia Orientador: Miguel Moreno-Azanza, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Co-orientador: Octávio Mateus, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa Júri: Presidente: Prof. Doutor Paulo Alexandre Rodrigues Roque Legoinha (FCT-UNL) Arguente: Doutor Hughes-Alexandres Blain (IPHES) Vogal: Doutor Miguel Moreno-Azanza (FCT-UNL) Júri: Dezembro 2018 MICROVERTEBRATES OF THE LOURINHÃ FORMATION (LATE JURASSIC, PORTUGAL) © Alexandre Renaud Daniel Guillaume, FCT/UNL e UNL A Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia e a Universidade Nova de Lisboa tem o direito, perpétuo e sem limites geográficos, de arquivar e publicar esta dissertação através de exemplares impressos reproduzidos em papel ou de forma digital, ou por qualquer outro meio conhecido ou que venha a ser inventado, e de a divulgar através de repositórios científicos e de admitir a sua cópia e distribuição com objetivos educacionais ou de investigação, não comerciais, desde que seja dado crédito ao autor e editor. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First of all, I would like to dedicate this thesis to my late grandfather “Papi Joël”, who wanted to tie me to a tree when I first start my journey to paleontology six years ago, in Paris. And yet, he never failed to support me at any cost, even if he did not always understand what I was doing and why I was doing it. He is always in my mind. Merci papi ! This master thesis has been one-year long project during which one there were highs and lows.
    [Show full text]
  • Geotourism and Geoconservation on the Isle of Wight, UK: Balancing Science with Commerce
    Carpenter: Rocky start of Dinosaur National Monument… Geoconservation Research Original Article Geotourism and Geoconservation on the Isle of Wight, UK: Balancing Science with Commerce Martin I. Simpson Lansdowne, Military Rd, Chale, Isle of Wight, PO38 2HH, UK. Abstract The Isle of Wight has a rich and varied geological heritage which attracts scientists, tourists and fossil collectors, both private and commercial. Each party has a role to play in geoconservation and geotourism, but a policy on the long term curation of scientifically important specimens is essential to prevent future conflicts. A new code of conduct is recommended, based on the one adopted on the Jurassic Coast of Dorset. I have spent over 40 years living on the Island and working in the tourist industry running geology field-trips for both academics and tourists, and managing one of the longest running geological gift shops. I see the geological heritage and fossil sites as valuable geotourism assets, and envisage no problems with respect to the scientifically important material provided that a clear collecting policy is adopted, and the local museum generates funding to ensure that significant finds remain on the Island. A positive attitude is recommended in view of past experiences. Corresponding Author: Martin I. Simpson Lansdowne, Military Rd, Chale, Isle of Wight, PO38 2HH, UK. Email: [email protected] Keywords: Palaeontology, Geology, Isle of Wight, Tourism. Introduction with few formations absent, probably one of the best successions of this type in Europe (Fig 1c).Once a larger landmass joined to the mainland The Isle of Wight is a small, vaguely lozenge-shaped island situated as recently as 9000 years ago, what remains as 'Wight Island' or 'Vecta just off the central south coast of England, about 113 km south west of Insula' is eroding away at a rate of one metre per year in places (Munt London (Fig 1a, 1b), renowned for its balmy climate and golden, sandy 2016), but this erosion has produced spectacular scenery and iconic beaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    Index Note: Page numbers in italic denote figures. Page numbers in bold denote tables. Abel, Othenio (1875–1946) Ashmolean Museum, Oxford, Robert Plot 7 arboreal theory 244 Astrodon 363, 365 Geschichte und Methode der Rekonstruktion... Atlantosaurus 365, 366 (1925) 328–329, 330 Augusta, Josef (1903–1968) 222–223, 331 Action comic 343 Aulocetus sammarinensis 80 Actualism, work of Capellini 82, 87 Azara, Don Felix de (1746–1821) 34, 40–41 Aepisaurus 363 Azhdarchidae 318, 319 Agassiz, Louis (1807–1873) 80, 81 Azhdarcho 319 Agustinia 380 Alexander, Annie Montague (1867–1950) 142–143, 143, Bakker, Robert. T. 145, 146 ‘dinosaur renaissance’ 375–376, 377 Alf, Karen (1954–2000), illustrator 139–140 Dinosaurian monophyly 93, 246 Algoasaurus 365 influence on graphic art 335, 343, 350 Allosaurus, digits 267, 271, 273 Bara Simla, dinosaur discoveries 164, 166–169 Allosaurus fragilis 85 Baryonyx walkeri Altispinax, pneumaticity 230–231 relation to Spinosaurus 175, 177–178, 178, 181, 183 Alum Shale Member, Parapsicephalus purdoni 195 work of Charig 94, 95, 102, 103 Amargasaurus 380 Beasley, Henry Charles (1836–1919) Amphicoelias 365, 366, 368, 370 Chirotherium 214–215, 219 amphisbaenians, work of Charig 95 environment 219–220 anatomy, comparative 23 Beaux, E. Cecilia (1855–1942), illustrator 138, 139, 146 Andrews, Roy Chapman (1884–1960) 69, 122 Becklespinax altispinax, pneumaticity 230–231, Andrews, Yvette 122 232, 363 Anning, Joseph (1796–1849) 14 belemnites, Oxford Clay Formation, Peterborough Anning, Mary (1799–1847) 24, 25, 113–116, 114, brick pits 53 145, 146, 147, 288 Benett, Etheldred (1776–1845) 117, 146 Dimorphodon macronyx 14, 115, 294 Bhattacharji, Durgansankar 166 Hawker’s ‘Crocodile’ 14 Birch, Lt.
    [Show full text]