DOCSLIB.ORG

Maximum Sustainable Yield, Maximum Economic Yield and Sustainability in Fisheries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Journal of Aquaculture & Marine Biology Conceptual paper Open Access Maximum sustainable yield, maximum economic yield and sustainability in fisheries Abstract Volume 9 Issue 1 - 2020 A brief review of the concept of Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) used in fisheries management is discussed. The convenience of assessing the exploited stocks with the aid Ernesto A Chávez of simulation is advised, because implies the possibility to analyze the age structure of the Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas del IPN, Mexico fishery in more detail, as compared to the traditional methods of fish stock assessment. Ernesto A Chávez, Centro Interdisciplinario Emphasis is given to the use of the MSY as limit reference point because as long as the Correspondence: de Ciencias Marinas del IPN, Av. IPN s/n Col. Playa Palo de Sta. Fishing Mortality or fishing effort required for that point is kept at lower values, the fishery Rita, El Conchalito La Paz, BCS, Mexico, Email will have a good chance to be sustainable. A mention of the Maximum Economic Yield is made, proposing its use a target for the management, because it is reached in general Received: January 08, 2020 | Published: February 07, 2020 with lower F values than that for the MSY, and this way keeping the fishery in a healthy condition. Keywords: maximum sustainable yield, fishing effort, economical harvesting, fishing mortality, fishing pressure Introduction By assessing the stocks with a simulation model that analyzes the age structure, MSY can be determined with the current tc and The use of some terms in fisheries science is of a common use, compared to the optimum MSY value as a function of tc. Then the especially in cases of fisheries management. A constant concern by difference between current MSY and optimum MSY is evaluated and fisheries scientists is the problem of assessing the exploited stocks unexploited potential yield is found. and devising accurate scenarios for their optimum and sustainable management (Mace 2001; Maunder, 2008). This problem becomes Based on the general principles of evaluation of fishery resources,3,4 critical as long as more and more stocks are overexploited with every the management strategies can be tested to determine the effect of the passing day, leading to economic crisis of groups of fishers depending effort on recruitment, biomass, capture and profits; these variables can on these fish resources. be compared under different exploitation scenarios so several optimal scenarios for the fishery are defined. Current data on operating costs The approach For assessing the stocks, an age structured and benefits for fishing are used, and the exploitation scenarios can simulation model was used, named FISMO (acronym of Fisheries be simulated by modifying the age of first catch (tc) and the fishing 1,2 Simulation Model), described by Chavez and Chávez-Ortiz. It is fed mortality (F); with the results provided by simulation, it is possible to with catch data and population parameter values; it can be run with identify the most appropriate management strategy. only biological data, as the growth rate parameter (K), the asymptotic length (L∞), the asymptotic weight (W∞), which are estimated by the Adoption of management strategies is a prime concern by model using the length (L)-weight (W) equation where its parameter fishing authorities, because on their accurate decisions depends the values a and b must be provided too. In many worldwide fisheries, conservation of fish stocks and the fisheries. A fishery is exploited parameter values are available in the Fish Base Web page. With sustainably as long as it allows being exploited for a long time. For simple economic information like costs of a fishing day per boat, the adoption of good management decisions, it is often based upon the number of boats fishing, and the value per kg of the catch at the reference points. Which are the bench marks used to compare the landing time (without value added), the economic performance the current status of a fishery respecting another status that can be of the fishery can be also examined. It is a tool accessible for the a desirable reference. There are basically two types, target reference users; aided by the population parameter values of each stock, the points and limit reference points.5 model transforms catch data and reconstructs the age structure over A traditional way used to describe the reference points of a single time, allowing the assessment of optimum biological and economical fishery is the surplus yield model,6 which roughly describes the effect of harvesting strategies under different management scenarios. These fishing intensity, equivalent to fishing mortality, on the stock biomass. scenarios are addressed to evaluate the stock response after changing This model is based on the assumption of a logistic growth of the the fishing mortality (F), which is directly proportional to the fishing population and its derivative describes the expected change in stock intensity and the age of first catch tc( ). biomass as consequence of the fishing intensity; this change displays It allows the possibility to identify quantitative scenarios and to a parabolic trend, whose apex is known as maximum sustainable optimize the adoption of management regulations addressed to the yield (MSY). In principle, any fishery should not be exploited with a identification of exploitation strategies. This would allow choosing fishing pressure (usually the fishing mortality, F) such that its effects the reduction of fishing effort to allow sufficient fish in the sea such surpass the MSY level, if this is so, the population will not be able to that they could maintain the stock in a healthy condition, this is, replace its biomass as consequence of reproduction. For this reason, enough number of adult fish capable to reproduce and maintain a the F MSY level is considered a limit reference point which should not relatively constant stock enough to supply a portion of the stock to be be surpassed, or otherwise the fishery will be overexploited or even harvested by the fishery. collapsed. A collapsed stock is when its biomass is just 10% of the size it had once and adopted as reference. Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com J Aquac Mar Biol. 2020;9(1):15‒17. 15 ©2020 Chávez. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially. Copyright: Maximum sustainable yield, maximum economic yield and sustainability in fisheries ©2020 Chávez 16 There are other reference points,5,7,8 but for the purpose of this The age of first catch is a factor with strong influence on the catch paper, they will be not mentioned here. Let us say that for management and on the status of an exploited stock. Since more than sixty years purposes, the main goal in the analysis and assessment of any fishery ago3 it is shown that the yield per recruit increases with the age of will be to evaluate the MSY and then, by using this as reference, to first catch, until the MSY is attained. However, many papers assessing identify which value of the F is causing this. The next step in the fisheries were published afterwards and up to present time, just a management process should be trying to apply the level of fishing few mention that by increasing the age of first catch by using nets effort responsible for that F value and then to reorient the fishery with wider mesh openings, the age/size of fish being caught will be to meet this goal. It is very important to remind that the fisheries older, allowing juvenile fish scaping from being caught. Doing this assessment must be carried on as a permanent procedure, otherwise has several benefic consequences, because young fish would have a any regulation applied may be wrong due to errors in the assessment chance to reach the age of maturity, there would be more fish having process. chance to breed, and the stock biomass would be much higher than in an overexploited condition. In this case, fishers would have a chance Maximum sustainable yield and maximum to get higher yields and the stock would have more probability to be economic yield exploited under a sustainable condition. This process is illustrated in Figure 2. When an age structured model is used for the assessment, resulting curve of the stock biomass is not symmetrical, it usually describes an asymmetric curve biased towards the left side, but the MSY is clearly indicated. Other componments of the fishery, like the number of boats and the number of fishers, describe curves with similar trajectory as the catch line, and the F at the maximum values of each of these variables is the same as that of the MSY. This is illustrated in Figure 1 showing the output of the bioeconomic variables of a fishery, where the trend line of the profits clearly indicate that the maximum value or maximum economic yield (MEY), it is attained at a lower F value than the one required for the MSY. This is a common trend observed in many fisheries; in a few cases, the FMEY coincides with the FMSY, but is never higher. For this reason, it is considered that its adoption could be a very convenient target in the fisheries management process, because it ensures not overfishing the fishery, and reduces the risk of undesirable environmental effects that may cause a wrong prognosis and therefore depletion of the fishery.9,10 Figure 2 Stock response as consequence of the use of two ages of first catch, one and three years old. In the lower curve, the age of first entry to the fishery corresponds to juvenile fish with tc=1; in the higher curve, all fishes with tc=3, all exploited stock are adult fish, allowing the population to reach higher biomass.
Recommended publications
  • SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES and RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: a Guide for USAID Staff and Partners

    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES and RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: a Guide for USAID Staff and Partners

    SUSTAINABLE FISHERIES AND RESPONSIBLE AQUACULTURE: A Guide for USAID Staff and Partners June 2013 ABOUT THIS GUIDE GOAL This guide provides basic information on how to design programs to reform capture fisheries (also referred to as “wild” fisheries) and aquaculture sectors to ensure sound and effective development, environmental sustainability, economic profitability, and social responsibility. To achieve these objectives, this document focuses on ways to reduce the threats to biodiversity and ecosystem productivity through improved governance and more integrated planning and management practices. In the face of food insecurity, global climate change, and increasing population pressures, it is imperative that development programs help to maintain ecosystem resilience and the multiple goods and services that ecosystems provide. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem functions are central to maintaining ecosystem integrity, health, and productivity. The intent of the guide is not to suggest that fisheries and aquaculture are interchangeable: these sectors are unique although linked. The world cannot afford to neglect global fisheries and expect aquaculture to fill that void. Global food security will not be achievable without reversing the decline of fisheries, restoring fisheries productivity, and moving towards more environmentally friendly and responsible aquaculture. There is a need for reform in both fisheries and aquaculture to reduce their environmental and social impacts. USAID’s experience has shown that well-designed programs can reform capture fisheries management, reducing threats to biodiversity while leading to increased productivity, incomes, and livelihoods. Agency programs have focused on an ecosystem-based approach to management in conjunction with improved governance, secure tenure and access to resources, and the application of modern management practices.
  • On Permaculture Design: More Thoughts

    On Permaculture Design: More Thoughts

    On Permaculture Design: More Thoughts ON PERMACULTURE DESIGN: MORE THOUGHTS, IDEAS, METHODOLOGIES, PRINCIPLES, TEMPLATES, STEPS, WANDERINGS, EFFICIENCIES, DEFICIENCIES, CONUNDRUMS AND WHATEVER STRIKES THE FANCY ... PERMACULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE SITE DESIGN Today professionals and students in business, government, education, healthcare, building, economics, technology, and ntal environme sciences are being called upon to ‘design’ sustainable programs and activities. Through systems science we have learned that actions taken today can affect the viability of living systems to support human activity and evolution for many generations to come. Sustainability is a concept introduced to communicate the imperative for humanity to develop in nment our built enviro those conditions that will sustain the structures, functions, and processes inextricably linked with capacities for life. The challenge we face in this new era of sustainability is a realization that the goals and needs for developing sustainable conditions in our social environment are complex, diverse, and at times counter to the dynamics of ecological systems. In recent years ecology has been called upon to include the studies of how humans interrelate with ecological processes, within ecosystems. Although humans are part of the natural ecosystem when we speak of human ecology, the relationships between humanity and the t environment, i is helpful to think of the ‘environment’ as the social system. What are the relationships and interactions within this ecosystem? What are the relationships and interactions between the social system and ecological environment (this includes air, soil, water, physical living and nonliving structures)? How do the interactions systems, between affect the global ecosystem? The most fundamental means we have as a society in transforming human ecology is through modeling and designing in our social environment those conditions that will influence sustainable interactions and relationships within the global ecological system.
  • Maximum Sustainable Yield from Interacting Fish Stocks in an Uncertain World: Two Policy Choices and Underlying Trade-Offs Arxiv

    Maximum Sustainable Yield from Interacting Fish Stocks in an Uncertain World: Two Policy Choices and Underlying Trade-Offs Arxiv

    Maximum sustainable yield from interacting fish stocks in an uncertain world: two policy choices and underlying trade-offs Adrian Farcas Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science Pakefield Road, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom [email protected] Axel G. Rossberg∗ Queen Mary University of London, School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 327 Mile End Rd, London E1, United Kingdom and Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science Pakefield Road, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, United Kingdom [email protected] 26 May 2016 c Crown copyright Abstract The case of fisheries management illustrates how the inherent structural instability of ecosystems can have deep-running policy implications. We contrast ten types of management plans to achieve maximum sustainable yields (MSY) from multiple stocks and compare their effectiveness based on a management strategy evalua- tion (MSE) that uses complex food webs in its operating model. Plans that target specific stock sizes (BMSY) consistently led to higher yields than plans targeting spe- cific fishing pressures (FMSY). A new self-optimising control rule, introduced here arXiv:1412.0199v6 [q-bio.PE] 31 May 2016 for its robustness to structural instability, led to intermediate yields. Most plans outperformed single-species management plans with pressure targets set without considering multispecies interactions. However, more refined plans to \maximise the yield from each stock separately", in the sense of a Nash equilibrium, produced total yields comparable to plans aiming to maximise total harvested biomass, and were more robust to structural instability. Our analyses highlight trade-offs between yields, amenability to negotiations, pressures on biodiversity, and continuity with current approaches in the European context.
  • Why Study Bycatch? an Introduction to the Theme Section on Fisheries Bycatch

    Why Study Bycatch? an Introduction to the Theme Section on Fisheries Bycatch

    Vol. 5: 91–102, 2008 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Printed December 2008 doi: 10.3354/esr00175 Endang Species Res Published online December xx, 2008 Contribution to the Theme Section ‘Fisheries bycatch problems and solutions’ OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Why study bycatch? An introduction to the Theme Section on fisheries bycatch Candan U. Soykan1,*, Jeffrey E. Moore2, Ramunas ¯ 5ydelis2, Larry B. Crowder2, Carl Safina3, Rebecca L. Lewison1 1Biology Department, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego, California 92182-4614, USA 2Center for Marine Conservation, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University Marine Laboratory, 135 Duke Marine Lab Road, Beaufort,North Carolina 28516, USA 3Blue Ocean Institute, PO Box 250, East Norwich, New York 11732, USA ABSTRACT: Several high-profile examples of fisheries bycatch involving marine megafauna (e.g. dolphins in tuna purse-seines, albatrosses in pelagic longlines, sea turtles in shrimp trawls) have drawn attention to the unintentional capture of non-target species during fishing operations, and have resulted in a dramatic increase in bycatch research over the past 2 decades. Although a number of successful mitigation measures have been developed, the scope of the bycatch problem far exceeds our current capacity to deal with it. Specifically, we lack a comprehensive understanding of bycatch rates across species, fisheries, and ocean basins, and, with few exceptions, we lack data on demographic responses to bycatch or the in situ effectiveness of existing mitigation measures. As an introduction to this theme section of Endangered Species Research ‘Fisheries bycatch: problems and solutions’, we focus on 5 bycatch-related questions that require research attention, building on exam- ples from the current literature and the contributions to this Theme Section.
  • Sustainability in International Law - S

    Sustainability in International Law - S

    INTRODUCTION TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – Sustainability in International Law - S. Wood SUSTAINABILITY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW S. Wood Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Canada Keywords: Agenda 21, Brundtland Commission, Climate Change Convention, Convention on Biological Diversity, developed countries, developing countries, development, Earth Summit, ecological limits, economic growth, ecosystem approach, environmental protection, fisheries, equity, international agreements, international environmental law, international institutions, international law, marine living resources, maximum sustainable yield, natural resources, optimum utilization, precautionary principle, Rio Declaration, Stockholm Conference, Stockholm Declaration, sustainability, sustainable development, sustainable utilization, UNEP, United Nations, World Charter for Nature. Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Overview of the Subject 1.2 Scope of the Article 1.3 What is International Law? 1.3.1 What Counts as “Law”? 1.3.2 Who Are the “Members of the International Community”? 2. Origins of Sustainability in International Law 3. Sustainability as Optimal Exploitation of Living Resources 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Sustainability as Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) 3.3 The MSY Era in International Law 3.3.1 MSY’s Rise to Prominence 3.3.2 Early Results and Controversies 3.4 The UN Law of the Sea Convention and the Displacement of MSY 3.5 Recent Trends 3.5.1 The Greening of International Fisheries Law 3.5.2 The Ascendancy of the “Sustainable Utilization” Paradigm 3.6 Conclusion 4. Sustainability as Respect for Ecological Limits 4.1 Sustainability as a General Concern with Human-Nature Interaction 4.2 EmergenceUNESCO of Sustainability as “Limits – to Growth”EOLSS 4.2.1 The 1972 Stockholm Conference 4.2.2 The 1982SAMPLE World Charter for Nature CHAPTERS 4.3 Contemporary Manifestations 4.4 Conclusion 5.
  • Climate Change and Food Systems

    Climate Change and Food Systems

    United Nations Food Systems Summit 2021 Scientific Group https://sc-fss2021.org/ Food Systems Summit Brief Prepared by Research Partners of the Scientific Group for the Food Systems Summit, May 2021 Climate Change and Food Systems by Alisher Mirzabaev, Lennart Olsson, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Prajal Pradhan, Marta Guadalupe Rivera Ferre, Hermann Lotze-Campen 1 Abstract Introduction Climate change affects the Climate change affects the functioning of all the components of food functioning of all the components of food systems, often in ways that exacerbate systems1 which embrace the entire range existing predicaments and inequalities of actors and their interlinked value-adding between regions of the world and groups in activities involved in the production, society. At the same time, food systems are aggregation, processing, distribution, a major cause for climate change, consumption, and recycling of food accounting for a third of all greenhouse gas products that originate from agriculture emissions. Therefore, food systems can (including livestock), forestry, fisheries, and and should play a much bigger role in food industries, and the broader economic, climate policies. This policy brief highlights societal, and natural environments in nine actions points for climate change which they are embedded2. At the same adaptation and mitigation in the food time, food systems are a major cause of systems. The policy brief shows that climate change, contributing about a third numerous practices, technologies, (21–37%) of the total Greenhouse Gas knowledge and social capital already exist (GHG) emissions through agriculture and for climate action in the food systems, with land use, storage, transport, packaging, multiple synergies with other important processing, retail, and consumption3 goals such as the conservation of (Figure 1).
  • Field Experiments Show That Acoustic Pingers Reduce Marine Mammal Bycatch in the California Drift Gill Net Fishery

    Field Experiments Show That Acoustic Pingers Reduce Marine Mammal Bycatch in the California Drift Gill Net Fishery

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Publications, Agencies and Staff of the U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Department of Commerce 2003 FIELD EXPERIMENTS SHOW THAT ACOUSTIC PINGERS REDUCE MARINE MAMMAL BYCATCH IN THE CALIFORNIA DRIFT GILL NET FISHERY Jay Barlow National Marine Fisheries Service, [email protected] Grant A. Cameron UCSD Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdeptcommercepub Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Barlow, Jay and Cameron, Grant A., "FIELD EXPERIMENTS SHOW THAT ACOUSTIC PINGERS REDUCE MARINE MAMMAL BYCATCH IN THE CALIFORNIA DRIFT GILL NET FISHERY" (2003). Publications, Agencies and Staff of the U.S. Department of Commerce. 236. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdeptcommercepub/236 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Commerce at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications, Agencies and Staff of the U.S. Department of Commerce by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. MARINE MAMMAL SCIENCE, 19(2):265-283 (April 2003) 0 2003 by the Society for Marine Mammalogy FIELD EXPERIMENTS SHOW THAT ACOUSTIC PINGERS REDUCE MARINE MAMMAL BYCATCH IN THE CALIFORNIA DRIFT GILL NET FISHERY JAY BARLOW GRANTA. CAMERON’ Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, 8604 La Jolla Shores Drive, La Jolla, California 92037, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A controlled experiment was carried out in 19961997 to determine whether acoustic deterrent devices (pingers) reduce marine mammal bycatch in the California drift gill net fishery for swordfish and sharks.
  • Coastal Upwelling Revisited: Ekman, Bakun, and Improved 10.1029/2018JC014187 Upwelling Indices for the U.S

    Coastal Upwelling Revisited: Ekman, Bakun, and Improved 10.1029/2018JC014187 Upwelling Indices for the U.S

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans RESEARCH ARTICLE Coastal Upwelling Revisited: Ekman, Bakun, and Improved 10.1029/2018JC014187 Upwelling Indices for the U.S. West Coast Key Points: Michael G. Jacox1,2 , Christopher A. Edwards3 , Elliott L. Hazen1 , and Steven J. Bograd1 • New upwelling indices are presented – for the U.S. West Coast (31 47°N) to 1NOAA Southwest Fisheries Science Center, Monterey, CA, USA, 2NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO, address shortcomings in historical 3 indices USA, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA • The Coastal Upwelling Transport Index (CUTI) estimates vertical volume transport (i.e., Abstract Coastal upwelling is responsible for thriving marine ecosystems and fisheries that are upwelling/downwelling) disproportionately productive relative to their surface area, particularly in the world’s major eastern • The Biologically Effective Upwelling ’ Transport Index (BEUTI) estimates boundary upwelling systems. Along oceanic eastern boundaries, equatorward wind stress and the Earth s vertical nitrate flux rotation combine to drive a near-surface layer of water offshore, a process called Ekman transport. Similarly, positive wind stress curl drives divergence in the surface Ekman layer and consequently upwelling from Supporting Information: below, a process known as Ekman suction. In both cases, displaced water is replaced by upwelling of relatively • Supporting Information S1 nutrient-rich water from below, which stimulates the growth of microscopic phytoplankton that form the base of the marine food web. Ekman theory is foundational and underlies the calculation of upwelling indices Correspondence to: such as the “Bakun Index” that are ubiquitous in eastern boundary upwelling system studies. While generally M. G. Jacox, fi [email protected] valuable rst-order descriptions, these indices and their underlying theory provide an incomplete picture of coastal upwelling.
  • Seafood Watch® Standard for Fisheries

    Seafood Watch® Standard for Fisheries

    1 Seafood Watch® Standard for Fisheries Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Seafood Watch Guiding Principles ...................................................................................................... 3 Seafood Watch Criteria and Scoring Methodology for Fisheries ........................................................... 5 Criterion 1 – Impacts on the Species Under Assessment ...................................................................... 8 Factor 1.1 Abundance .................................................................................................................... 9 Factor 1.2 Fishing Mortality ......................................................................................................... 19 Criterion 2 – Impacts on Other Capture Species ................................................................................ 22 Factor 2.1 Abundance .................................................................................................................. 26 Factor 2.2 Fishing Mortality ......................................................................................................... 27 Factor 2.3 Modifying Factor: Discards and Bait Use .................................................................... 29 Criterion
  • Other Processes Regulating Ecosystem Productivity and Fish Production in the Western Indian Ocean Andrew Bakun, Claude Ray, and Salvador Lluch-Cota

    Other Processes Regulating Ecosystem Productivity and Fish Production in the Western Indian Ocean Andrew Bakun, Claude Ray, and Salvador Lluch-Cota

    CoaStalUpwellinO' and Other Processes Regulating Ecosystem Productivity and Fish Production in the Western Indian Ocean Andrew Bakun, Claude Ray, and Salvador Lluch-Cota Abstract /1 Theseasonal intensity of wind-induced coastal upwelling in the western Indian Ocean is investigated. The upwelling off Northeast Somalia stands out as the dominant upwelling feature in the region, producing by far the strongest seasonal upwelling pulse that exists as a; regular feature in any ocean on our planet. It is surmised that the productive pelagic fish habitat off Southwest India may owe its particularly favorable attributes to coastal trapped wave propagation originating in a region of very strong wind-driven offshore trans­ port near the southern extremity of the Indian Subcontinent. Effects of relatively mild austral summer upwelling that occurs in certain coastal ecosystems of the southern hemi­ sphere may be suppressed by the effects of intense onshore transport impacting these areas during the opposite (SW Monsoon) period. An explanation for the extreme paucity of fish landings, as well as for the unusually high production of oceanic (tuna) fisheries relative to coastal fisheries, is sought in the extremely dissipative nature of the physical systems of the region. In this respect, it appears that the Gulf of Aden and some areas within the Mozambique Channel could act as important retention areas and sources of i "see6stock" for maintenance of the function and dillersitv of the lamer reoional biolooical , !I ecosystems. 103 104 large Marine EcosySlIlms ofthe Indian Ocean - . Introduction The western Indian Ocean is the site ofsome of the most dynamically varying-. large marine ecosystems (LMEs) that exist on our planet.
  • ICELAND, WHALING and ECOSYSTEM - BASED FISHERY MANAGEMENT

    ICELAND, WHALING and ECOSYSTEM - BASED FISHERY MANAGEMENT

    ICELAND, WHALING and ECOSYSTEM - BASED FISHERY MANAGEMENT PETER CORKERON Iceland, whaling and ecosystem-based fishery management. Peter Corkeron Ph.D. http://aleakage.blogspot.com/ 1 Introduction Icelanders look to the sea, and always have. Fishing has always been important to them, and they have a good record of attempting to ensure that their fisheries are sustainable. As the Icelandic Ministry of Fisheries stated in a declaration on 17th October 2006, “The Icelandic economy is overwhelmingly dependent on the utilisation of living marine resources in the ocean around the country. The sustainability of the utilisation is therefore of central importance for the long-term well being of the Icelandic people. For this reason, Iceland places great emphasis on effective management of fisheries and on scientific research on all the components of the marine ecosystem. At a time when many fish stocks around the world are declining, or even depleted, Iceland's marine resources are generally in a healthy state, because of this emphasis. The annual catch quotas for fishing and whaling are based on recommendations by scientists, who regularly monitor the status of stocks, thus ensuring that the activity is sustainable.”. Fisheries account for approximately 40% of the value of Iceland’s exported goods and exported services, and roughly two-thirds of Iceland's exported goods, minus services. Fisheries and fish processing account for little under 10% of Iceland’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP), down from more than 15% in 1980. With a population of just over 300,000 in 2007, Iceland is the world’s 178th largest nation, but in 2002 it was still ranked as the world’s 13th largest fisheries exporter.
  • Fisheries Oceanography Warren S

    Fisheries Oceanography Warren S

    FISHERIES OCEANOGRAPHY WARREN S. WOOSTER ’ Scripps Institution of Oceanography University of California, La Jolla, California In considering how to summarize the oceanographic stirring aiid cmistal np~~~lling)or secontlary effects aspects of the papers we have just heard, I found of thr wind-driven circulation (for exaniple, doming my thoughts falling into several distinct rategories- or ridging). the definition and goals of fisheries oceanography, cur- The near surface circulation may aff~ctdirectly rent practice in this field, adthe success of this the distribution or abundance of organisms at all approach. trophic lcvc~ls. In addition, changes in the intensity Some may feel that fisheries oceanography is noth- of the refertilizing procc’sst’s are reflected in the time ing more spwific than the broad assemblage of prob- mid spaw distribution of primary produc:tioii. This lems being studied by oceanographers working for in turii affects production iii thr n~xthig1ic.r trophic fishery laboratories. The interests of marine fisheries level, aiid so on. with assorted time and spac:e lags, scieiitists and those of oceanographers overlap in SO to the desircd fish. At each step ill this line of rwson- maiiy arras that aliiiost any marine rc>search can be iiig, rrfinmnieiits and eoniplications are involvrtl, but, inclnded in a suitably broad definition. But unfor- the basic thciiie of the model reinaiiis: tniiately \uch broad definitions haw little opera- ii (’haiiges in the wind firld lcacl eve~ltually to tional value. changes in the succ(~ssof fishing. ’’ One might speak, however, of a somewhat restricted Th(3 goal of investigatioii of this niotlel is often roil- area of marine research which could be calld ecologi- siderrd to be prdictioii.