Innis' Great Transformationl Staples Thesis/Medium Theory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Innis' Great Transformationl Staples Thesis/Medium Theory View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Canadian Journal of Communication (CJC) Research in Brief Innis’ Great Transformation: Staples Thesis/Medium Theory1 Robert E. Babe University of Western Ontario ABSTRACT Harold Innis inaugurated his research into Canadian economic history (staples studies) to countervail the purportedly universalist claims of mainstream economics; he be- lieved the mainstream “justified” exploitation of the developing world by the wealthiest coun- tries. Conversely, he sought out universalist principles in his media/communication work in order to countervail omnipresent misunderstanding in the world; he hoped to establish thereby a common ground conducive to world peace. The dialectic or contradiction of rela- tivism/universalism in Innis’ two major inquiries has hitherto remained unrecognized, and constitutes the focus of this article. KEYWORDS Innis; Dialectic; Staples; Economic theory; Medium theory RÉSUMÉ Harold Innis a entamé sa recherche sur l’histoire économique canadienne (théorie des principales ressources) pour contrer les postulats supposément universels de la science économique traditionnelle; il croyait que le courant traditionnel « justifiait » l’exploitation des pays en voie de développement par les pays les plus riches. Lui au contraire cherchait dans son travail sur les médias et la communication des principes universels qui supplanteraient cette incompréhension répandue dans le monde. Il espérait ainsi établir un terrain d’entente propice à favoriser la paix mondiale. La dialectique ou contradiction entre le relativisme et l’universalisme dans les deux enquêtes majeures effectuées par Innis n’a pas jusqu’à présent été reconnue, et constitue le sujet de cet article. MOTS CLÉS Innis; Dialectique; Principales ressources; Théorie économique; Théorie des médias According to his biographer and friend Donald Creighton, Harold Innis’ first decade of scholarship at the University of Toronto (1920–1930) was filled with frustration and loneliness (Creighton, 1978): he was the only one on staff researching Canadian eco- nomic history, for example, and his book on the fur trade (finally appearing in 1930) had been rejected by several publishers. Moreover, he was then calling for a new eco- nomics to countervail the hegemony of the economics establishment,2 hardly an en- terprise endearing him to the economics mainstream. Indeed, he expressed deep admiration for ostracized economist Thorstein Veblen, a position sure to lose him Robert E. Babe is Professor of Information and Media Studies, University of Western Ontario. Email: [email protected]. Canadian Journal of Communication Vol 40 (2015) 489–501 ©2015 Canadian Journal of Communication Corporation 490 Canadian Journal of Communication, Vol 40 (3) friends and antagonize people (Innis, 1979b). By the early to mid-1930s, however, Innis’ status within the Canadian scholarly establishment had changed dramatically, and by 1940, if not before, he was widely regarded as Canada’s pre-eminent scholar. One might well ask, therefore, why Innis, at the very apex of his career,3 would choose in the 1940s to again become “lonely and intellectually isolated” (Watson, 2006, p. 167), again to inaugurate and develop a line of research that few understood or ap- preciated,4 again to risk ostracism by disputing axioms held as inviolable by the inter- national scholarly elite.5 Numerous commentators have wrestled with these questions. Here I begin by reviewing briefly, but critically, some of that literature. This critical re- view and commentary will help delineate relations between Innis’ staples thesis and his medium theory, and also help identify (in Innis’ eyes) the limitations (or biases) of the former. Commentators’ speculations A complicated and contradictory person Eric Havelock scanned the surface of Innis’ psychological makeup and concluded that Innis “was a complicated and even contradictory person” (1982, p. 17), hinting perhaps that Innis was not quite stable. Maybe that was why he risked throwing so much away! Havelock described Innis also as “the radical conservative of his day” (p. 22), as the proverbial insider-outsider who steadfastly sought after and attained insider status early and at mid-career, but who seemingly repudiated all that in choosing, in his final decade, to again become an outsider. Regarding Innis’ emotional stability, or lack thereof, one could indeed point to Innis’ pessimism, to his tendency to depression,6 and to his “mental breakdown” of 1937 (Creighton, 1978; Watson, 2006). Regarding his purportedly overweening ambi- tion, however, Havelock’s conjectures seem totally off-target. It was not self-aggrandiz- ment or lust for status, as Havelock contends,7 that drove Innis in his early and mid-career. Innis did choose in the 1920s, after all, to inaugurate, in isolation, a new and countervailing approach to economics; he fervently berated the economics main- stream for being (as he saw it) an instrument for economic exploitation (among other non desiderata); he resigned, and later again threatened to resign, from his position at the University of Toronto—in the latter instance to support another outsider, Frank Underhill (with whom he disagreed fervently); he resigned from an office with the Royal Society of Canada on a matter of principle (Creighton, 1980); he continually made disparaging remarks, from at least the mid-1930s, regarding not just the compe- tence but also the integrity of governmental and scholarly elites—including university presidents and other administrators.8 These are not the behaviours or strategies of one lusting after status or power. Far more convincing than Havelock’s conjectures is the proposition that through- out his career, Innis consistently wrote what he thought was most truthful. His pes- simism and skepticism enabled (and indeed perhaps required) him to see matters in ways not conforming to the mainstream. Innis was an “inner-directed,” honest scholar to begin with, and he remained just that until the very end. He eventually received the approval and praise of elites (particularly in Canada), true, but this was due to the Babe Innis’ Staples Thesis/Medium Theory 491 originality and integrity of his staples work (which, incidentally, aligned at the time with the interests of domestic politicians and civil servants intent on furthering Canadian independence). That said, the question still remains: Why would Innis feel the need to change the focus (and indeed the very ontology) of his scholarship, to move from staples to media, and thereby risk misunderstanding and non-acceptance? Testing for bias In 1952, Innis’ colleague, Tom Easterbrook, addressed the American Economics Association to honour the recently deceased Innis. Easterbrook proposed that Innis’ shift from staples to communication/media entailed “no suggestion of a break or loss of continuity or of interests” (1953a, pp. 8–9). At another commemoration, Easterbrook made a similar pronouncement: “Although it is possible to mark out some [phases] in Innis’s work, there is at no point any suggestion of a break or a radical shift in his mode of approach to national or general economic history” (1953b, p. 292). To support these claims, Easterbrook noted (correctly) that Innis had always been intent to test the limits or biases of knowledge. When developing his staples thesis, for example, Easterbrook explained, Innis was testing the limitations of the economics mainstream—and he quoted Innis to that effect (Easterbrook, 1953b). That being said, I must point out that Innis had much more in mind than just testing for bias in developing his staples thesis. Actually, his main mission was the de- velopment of a new economics for emerging economies, such as Canada’s, to countervail the exploitative thrust, as he saw it, of the economics mainstream (Innis, 1972b; 1979a). Throughout his life Innis was always dialectical with regard to the mainstream. To continue, Innis later redeployed in his media/communication work tools he had originally developed to analyze staples (Easterbrook, 1953b), in part (again accord- ing to Easterbrook) to test limitations or biases. And again, Innis himself can be quoted to support this claim (Innis, 1972a). However, once again, I must remark, Easterbrook failed to note that Innis had much bigger fish to fry than just testing for bias. His goals in developing media/communication, in fact, were in important respects antithetical to his goals for his staples work. As developed below, Innis sought after universal un- derstanding to strengthen possibilities for world peace. Paper to media/communication Other commentators suggest that in transitioning to media/communication, Innis merely extended his staples investigations of the timber and paper staples to news, public opinion, propaganda, advertising, and so forth (Berger, 1976; Bickerton, Brooks, & Gagnon, 2006; Heyer, 2003; McLuhan, 1971). The incompleteness (one might say the bias) in this claim, again, is that it fails to recognize that Innis’ communication work is in important aspects antithetical to the staples thesis and that he developed the two bodies of writing for diametrically opposed reasons. As developed below, Innis resolved this dialectical tension only on his deathbed. Donald Creighton (1980), it is true, captured some of the mental anguish Innis must have experienced in transitioning from staples to media. However, Creighton also remarked (consistently with others just cited) that “originally, pulp and paper had
Recommended publications
  • Digital Media Practice and Medium Theory Informing Learning on Mobile Touch Screen Devices
    Touching knowledge: Digital media practice and medium theory informing learning on mobile touch screen devices Victor Alexander Renolds Bachelor of Communications (Interactive Multimedia) College of Arts & Education Victoria University. Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Arts 13 November 2017 Abstract The years since 2007 have seen the worldwide uptake of a new type of mobile computing device with a touch screen interface. While this context presents accessible and low cost opportunities to extend the reach of higher education, there is little understanding of how learning occurs when people interact with these devices in their everyday lives. Medium theory concerns the study of one type of media and its unique effects on people and culture (Meyrowitz, 2001, p. 10). My original contribution to knowledge is to use medium theory to examine the effects of the mobile touch screen device (MTSD) on the learning experiences and practices of adults. My research question is: What are the qualities of the MTSD medium that facilitate learning by practice? The aim of this thesis is to produce new knowledge towards enhancing higher education learning design involving MTSDs. The project involved a class of post-graduates studying communications theory who were asked to complete a written major assessment using their own MTSDs. Their assignment submissions form the qualitative data that was collected and analysed, supplemented with field notes capturing my own post-graduate learning experiences whilst using an MTSD. I predominantly focus on the ideas of Marshall McLuhan within the setting of medium theory as my theoretical framework. The methods I use are derived from McLuhan's Laws of the Media (1975), its phenomenological underpinnings and relevance to the concept of ‘flow' (Csikszentmihalyi, 2014b, p.
    [Show full text]
  • MA JMC CBCSS Syllabus 2019.Pages
    UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT ————————————————- BOARD OF STUDIES IN JOURNALISM (PG) FACULTY OF JOURNALISM REGULATIONS & SYLLABUS M A PROGRAMME IN JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION (MA JMC-CBCSS) FOR AFFILIATED COLLEGES (FROM 2019 ADMISSION) !1 UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT ————————————————- BOARD OF STUDIES IN JOURNALISM (PG) FACULTY OF JOURNALISM PROGRAMME REGULATIONS MASTER OF ARTS IN JOURNALISM & MASS COMMUNICATION (MA-JMC) CBCSS 2019 admission For AFFILIATED Colleges Title of the Programme affiliated Master of Arts in Journalism and Mass Communication ( MA JMC) Duration of the Programme Four semesters with each semester consisting of a minimum of 90 working days distributed over a minimum of 18 weeks, each of 5 working days Eligibility for Admission Candidates who have passed a Bachelor Degree course of the University of Calicut or any other university recognised by the University of Calicut as equivalent thereto and have secured a minimum of 50% marks in aggregate are eligible to apply. However, professional graduates will be considered for admission, provided they secure minimum of first class (60%) in overall subjects. Backward communities and SC/ST candidates will get relaxation in marks as per the university rules. Admission Procedure Admission to the program shall be made in the order of merit of performance of eligible candidates at the entrance examination. The entrance examination will assess the language ability, general knowledge and journalistic aptitude of the candidate. Weightage Marks Holders of PG diploma in journalism 5 marks Graduates with journalism sub 5 marks Three year degree holders with Journalism as Main 7 marks Bachelor’s Degree holders in Multimedia Communication / Visual Communication/ Film Production/Video Production 5 marks Candidates will be given weight age in only one of the categories whichever is higher.
    [Show full text]
  • FW2019 Catalogue Outside Cover.Indd
    WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY PRESS Fall 2019 | SERIES Canadian Commentaries Canadian Unit, Formation, and Command Histories | Series Editor: Mike Bechthold CMTS Dialogues | Series Editor: Marta Marín-Domine Crossing Lines | Series Editors: Barbara Postema, Candida Rifkind, and Nhora Lucía Serrano Early Canadian LIterature | Series Editor: Benjamin Lefebvre Environmental Humanities | Series Editor: Cheryl Lousley Film and Media Studies | Series Editors: Philippa Gates, Russell Kilbourn, and Ute Lischke Indigenous Studies | Series Editor: Deanna Reder Laurier Poetry | Series Editors: Neil Besner and Brian Henderson Laurier Studies in Political Philosophy | Series Editor: Ashwani K. Peetush Life Writing | Series Editors: Marlene Kadar and Sonja Boon Memory and Testimony Studies | Series Editors: Marta Marín-Dòmine and Colman Hogan Studies in Childhood and Family in Canada | Series Editor: Cynthia Comacchio TransCanada | Series Editor: Smaro Kamboureli Wilfrid Laurier University Press is grateful for the support it receives from Wilfrid Laurier University; the Canada Council for the Arts; the Awards to Scholarly Publications Program (with funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada); and the Ontario Arts Council. The Press acknowledges the nancial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Book Fund and Livres Canada Books. The Press acknowledges the assistance of Ontario Creates. We acknowledge that Wilfrid Laurier University Press is located on the Haldimand tract, traditional territory of the Neutral, Anishnaabe, and Haudenosaunee peoples. Wilfrid Laurier University Press Phone Directory Manuscript proposals 75 University Avenue West Toll-free in North America: WLU Press welcomes manuscripts Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5 866-836-5551 from Canadian scholars. Send Canada Phone: 519-884-0710 inquiries to Siobhan McMenemy Fax: 519-725-1399 General inquiries, Sales, Marketing, at the above address or email [email protected] or Email: [email protected] and Publicity: Ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Harold Innis and the Empire of Speed
    Review of International Studies (1999), 25, 273–289 Copyright © British International Studies Association Harold Innis and the Empire of Speed RONALD J. DEIBERT* Abstract. Increasingly, International Relations (IR) theorists are drawing inspiration from a broad range of theorists outside the discipline. One thinks of the introduction of Antonio Gramsci’s writings to IR theorists by Robert Cox, for example, and the ‘school’ that has developed in its wake. Similarly, the works of Anthony Giddens, Michel Foucault, and Jurgen Habermas are all relatively familiar to most IR theorists not because of their writings on world politics per se, but because they were imported into the field by roving theorists. Many others of varying success could be cited as well. Such cross-disciplinary excursions are important because they inject vitality into a field that—in the opinion of some at least—is in need of rejuvenation in the face of contemporary changes. In this paper, I elaborate on the work of the Canadian communications theorist Harold Innis, situating his work within contemporary IR theory while underlining his historicism, holism, and attention to time- space biases. Introduction One of the more refreshing developments in recent International Relations (IR) theorizing has been the increasing willingness among scholars to step outside of traditional boundaries to draw from theorists not usually associated with the study of international relations.1 My own expeditions in this respect have been in the communications field, where I have drawn from an approach called ‘medium theory.’ Writers generally associated with this approach, such as Harold Innis, Marshall McLuhan, Eric Havelock, and Walter Ong, have analysed how different media of communications affect communication content, cognition, and the character of societies.2 In a recent study, I modified and reformulated medium theory to help * An earlier version of this article was delivered to the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 28–31, 1997, Washington, DC.
    [Show full text]
  • Joshua Meyrowitz’S Medium Theory Analyses the Impact of the Electronic Media on Human Behavior in Everyday Life?
    Brand 1 Catherine Brand (ID N00185778) Instructor: Jae Kang Media Studies: Ideas Fall 2010 6 October 2010 How does Joshua Meyrowitz’s medium theory analyses the impact of the electronic media on human behavior in everyday life? This paper aims to explain how Joshua Meyrowitz’s medium theory analyses the impact of the electronic media on human behavior in everyday life. It is an attempt to clarify the different ideas that are developed by the author and that ultimately lead to a better comprehension of his theory. To provide a historical context, this paper considers critical research developments conducted by first generation medium theorists Harold Innis and Marshall McLuhan. It then focuses on Meyrowitz’s medium theory and its analysis of the impact of electronic media by examining the notions of situations as information systems and roles as information networks. This paper concludes with an evaluation of the theory’s contributions and shortcomings. Before discussing Joshua Meyrowitz’s medium theory it is important to gain an insight into the work of his predecessors, first generation medium theorists Harold Innis and Marshall McLuhan. Trained as an economic historian, Harold Innis (1894-1952) draws a parallel between economic monopolies and information monopolies. He argues that the control of media of communication has an impact on changes occurring in a society and on the sustainability of a society. In The Bias of Communication he rewrites the history of Western civilization by placing the innovation of media technology at the center of social and political changes. He observes that a medium of communication has an influence on the dissemination of knowledge and that depending on its characteristics it is either space or time biased.
    [Show full text]
  • New Social Media and Public Relations: Review of the Medium Theory
    NEW SOCIAL MEDIA AND PUBLIC RELATIONS: REVIEW OF THE MEDIUM THEORY Oleh Andi Windah Staf Pengajar Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi FISIP Universitas Lampung ABSTRAK Media telah menjadi bagian yang tak terpisahkan dengan masyarakat. Integrasi ini membawa berbagai perubahan kepada kedua belah pihak mengingat interaksi yang terjalin di antara keduanya. Salah satu perubahan yang mendasar adalah bagaimana media telah membawa sudut pandang baru bagi masyarakat dalam menjalani kehidupannya sehari-hari. Bila dikaji dari sejarah, kondisi ini sebenarnya sudah terjadi sedari media itu ditemukan untuk pertama kalinya. Gagasan bahwa media adalah sebuah lingkungan yang mampu mendorong inovasi bahkan revolusi sebagaimana yang dicetuskan oleh para ahli teori medium. Artikel ini menilik lebih jauh mengenai keberadaan teori medium dengan menggunakan metode studi literatur dan contoh aplikasinya yakni melalui keberadaan media sosial dan implikasi penggunaan media sosial dalam praktek kehumasan. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan praktis dengan menekankan pada pembahasan deskriptif. Dari hasil pembahasan, ditemukan bahwa teori medium berakar pada konsep keberadaan media sebagai sebuah lingkungan yang mampu membawa pengaruh dan perubahan kepada kehidupan manusia. Misalnya aktivitas dalam media sosial semakin mempengaruhi kehidupan di luar media sosial, dengan contoh kasus pemilihan Presiden Barack Obama pada tahun 2008.Kehadiran media sosial juga memciptakan banyak peluang baru bagi praktek di dunia kehumasan, misalnya munculnya profesi kehumasan yang khusus mengelola image perusahaan melalui dunia maya. Kata kunci: media sosial, kehumasan “Facebook has changed me. I remember I once found it difficult to cope with the idea of having a photograph of myself in a public space. I am less private than I used to be” (Golds, 2010) “I tweetedmy opinions on the topics covered in Online Marketing Inside Out book.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Quayle Innis and Her Relationship to Harold Innis' Legacy1
    “Both of us can move mountains”: Mary Quayle Innis and Her Relationship to Harold Innis’ Legacy1 J. David Black Wilfrid Laurier University and Royal Roads University Abstract: This paper offers an account of the life and work of Mary Quayle Innis (1899-1972), the wife of Harold Innis, and a figure largely unknown in the Innis scholarship. Using material taken from her writing, archival sources, and inter- views with two of the Innises’ children, this paper provides background on her contributions to Canadian culture as a writer and editor. The paper also specu- lates on her possible influence upon Innis’ political economy and media research, and suggests that in understanding Mary Quayle Innis better, puzzling features of Harold Innis’ own work are illuminated. A full bibliography of works by and about Mary Innis is attached. Résumé: Cet essai présente un compte-rendu de la vie et de l’oeuvre de Mary Quayle Innis (1899-1972). En comparaison de l’oeuvre de son mari Harold Innis, Mary, qui était écrivain et éditeur lui-même, est rarement reconnue, mais cet article vise sa contribution à la culture canadienne, en explorant des archives, des extraits de sa propre écriture et des entretiens avec ses enfants. Cet article spécule sur son influence possible sur l’écriture de Harold et propose qu’on peut mieux comprendre certains traits intriguants de l’oeuvre de Harold, en comprennant celle de Mary Quayle. Keywords: History; Toronto School; Feminist/Gender Introduction “Both of us can move mountains” Harold Innis writes in a 1919 letter to his fiancée, Mary (Emma) Quayle, not long after he returned to Toronto upon com- pleting most of his PhD obligations at the University of Chicago.
    [Show full text]
  • In Media Theory: the ’Media-Centrism’ Debate Terry Flew
    The ’Theory’ in Media Theory: The ’Media-Centrism’ Debate Terry Flew To cite this version: Terry Flew. The ’Theory’ in Media Theory: The ’Media-Centrism’ Debate. Media Theory, Media Theory, 2017, Manifestos, 1 (1), pp.43-56. hal-01687715 HAL Id: hal-01687715 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01687715 Submitted on 18 Jan 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Special Issue: Manifestos Media Theory The ‘Theory’ in Media Theory: Vol. 1 | No. 1 | 43-56 © The Author(s) 2017 The ‘Media-Centrism’ Debate CC-BY-NC-ND http://mediatheoryjournal.org/ TERRY FLEW Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia With the launch of a new journal called Media Theory, the question presents itself as to what is ‘media theory’, as distinct from social theory as applied to the media. There are certainly plenty of studies that consider the media in relation to the great traditions of sociology and critical theory, as there are also applications of various strands of political theory (pluralism, elite theory, class theory) and economic theory (neoclassical, political economy, institutionalism) to the media (Winseck, 2011; Waisbord, 2012; Cunningham et.
    [Show full text]
  • Key Themes in Media Theory
    Key Themes in Media Theory “Key Themes in Media Theory is wonderfully wide-ranging and deservedly destined to become a key text for students of Media Studies.” Professor John Storey, Centre for Research in Media and Cultural Studies, University of Sunderland, UK Key Themes What is media theory? How do media affect our actions, opinions and beliefs? In what ways do media serve powerful political and economic interests? in Is media consumerism unhealthy or is it empowering? Media Theory Key Themes in Media Theory provides a thorough and critical introduction Themes in to the key theories of media studies. It is unique in bringing together different schools of media theory into a single, comprehensive text, examining in depth the ideas of key media theorists such as Lasswell, McLuhan, Hall, Williams, Barthes, Adorno, Baudrillard and Bourdieu. Media Theory Using up-to-date case studies the book embraces media in their everyday cultural forms – music, internet, film, television, radio, newspapers and magazines – to enable a clearer view of the ‘big picture’ of media theory. In ten succinct chapters Dan Laughey discusses a broad range of themes, issues and perspectives that inform our contemporary understanding of media production and consumption. These include: Behaviourism and media effects Feminist media theory Postmodernity and information society Political economy Media consumerism With images and diagrams to illustrate chapter themes, examples that apply Dan Laughey media theory to media practice, recommended reading at the end of every chapter, and a useful glossary of key terms, this book is the definitive guide to understanding media theory. Dan Laughey is Senior Lecturer in Media Studies at Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne Innis Dagg - Pioneer Award
    Anne Innis Dagg - Pioneer Award Anne Innis Dagg was born in Toronto, Ontario on January 25, 1933. In the 1950s, she at- tended the University of Toronto for her B.A. in Biology and M.A. in Genetics. She then trav- eled solo to South Africa to study giraffes, a species that had fascinated her since, as a small child, she first saw them in a zoo. Against the odds, she located a wild population and began her pioneering studies of giraffe social behaviour—-a pursuit that became her life’s work. In 1974, she completed her PhD in Animal Behaviour at the University of Waterloo on the topic of comparing the gaits of giraffe and other large mammals. With this, she is recognized as the first person to study animal behaviour in the wild in Africa. However, the University of Waterloo did not hire women in the biology department. She was hired in a program that became known as Independent Studies where students did the hiring and she continues in that pro- gram today. Anne Dagg has over 60 refereed scientific papers to her credit on such topics as homosexuality, behaviour of mammals, sociobiology, feminism, sexism at universities and the rights of animals. She has also written 20 books and over 100 articles on these topics. She published the book Giraffe: behaviour, and conservation. in 2014. Anne continues well into re- tirement time with her work. She received her own Anne Dagg Pioneer Award from the Interna- tional Association of Giraffe Care Professionals in 2010. On a lighter note, she received the Distinguished Old Girl Award from her Bishop Strachan high school in 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • New Media, Mediation, and Communication Study
    Information, Communication & Society ISSN: 1369-118X (Print) 1468-4462 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rics20 NEW MEDIA, MEDIATION, AND COMMUNICATION STUDY Leah A. Lievrouw To cite this article: Leah A. Lievrouw (2009) NEW MEDIA, MEDIATION, AND COMMUNICATION STUDY , Information, Communication & Society, 12:3, 303-325, DOI: 10.1080/13691180802660651 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691180802660651 Published online: 09 Mar 2011. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 3277 View related articles Citing articles: 9 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rics20 Download by: [University of Liverpool] Date: 14 October 2016, At: 02:14 Leah A. Lievrouw NEW MEDIA, MEDIATION, AND COMMUNICATION STUDY1 The division of the communication discipline according to whether people communicate face-to-face or via a technological medium has shaped the field’s development from the outset. The divide has been institutionalized over time in the structures of academic departments and schools, professional training and degrees, scholarly societies and publishing, and in the field’s larger research agendas. However, critics inside and outside the field have long insisted that the differences between the two subfields actually obscure the shifting, contingent nature of communication in everyday experience, social formations, and culture. This paper traces efforts to theorize the intersection of interpersonal and media communication, and in particu- lar the concept of mediation, from Lazarsfeld and Katz’s two-step flow in the 1950s, to the challenge of digital media technologies in the 1970s and 1980s, to the rise of new media studies and digital culture scholarship from the 1990s onward.
    [Show full text]
  • Theatrical & Festival Booking Contacts: Nancy Gerstman & Emily Russo
    Theatrical & Festival Booking Contacts: Nancy Gerstman & Emily Russo, Zeitgeist Films 212-274-1989 • [email protected][email protected] A ZEITGEIST FILMS RELEASE in association with KINO LORBER Page 1 of 10 The Woman Who Loves Giraffes is the story of Canadian biologist Dr. Anne Innis Dagg, written and directed by Alison Reid (The Baby Formula), produced by Joanne Jackson (The Messenger, The Big Wait, Long Haul Big Hearts) and Alison Reid, and executive produced by Paul Zimic (Grass 2, Never Enough). The documentary features the voices of Tatiana Maslany (Orphan Black), Victor Garber (Argo, Milk, Titanic), David Chinchilla (The Expanse) and Lindsay Leese (Bomb Girls) reading letters written by young Anne, Fleur de Lys manager, Alex Matthew, Anne’s husband, Ian Dagg, and Anne’s mother, Mary Quayle Innis. The film was shot between 2013 and 2018 on location in Brookfield Zoo, Chicago; Ontario, Canada; Samburu National Reserve, Kenya; Fleur de Lys, South Africa; and Natural Bridge Wildlife Ranch, San Antonio, Texas. The Woman Who Loves Giraffes incorporates vintage 16mm archival footage from 1956-57 which was filmed by Anne Dagg herself, and, when she is in frame, Alex Matthew. Cinematography by Dale Hildebrand (Peace, TO in 24) and Iris Ng (Point of Departure, Stories We Tell, The Ghosts In Our Machine), editing by Mike Munn (Hip-Hop Evolution, Stories We Tell) and Caroline Christie (Birdland, Frankie Drake Mysteries, Project Grizzly), costume design by Anne Dixon (Anne with an E, Shoot the Messenger) and music by Tom Third (What Wala Wants, Yellow is Forbidden, Shoot the Messenger, The Listener).
    [Show full text]