Amazon Inc. Stock Rating BUY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amazon Inc. Stock Rating BUY EQUITY RESEARCH 30th October 2018 Amazon Inc. Stock Rating BUY Post Q3 2018 results, we maintain our BUY recommendation and Price Target of $2200. Overall, Amazon reported good results for Q3 2018. Sales came in at $56.6bln, Country United States Industry Consumer Cyclical at the high end of management’s guidance $54bln-$57.5bln. Ticker AMZN ISIN US0231351067 Having said this, shares were down heavily post results. Reason being that although sales came in towards the high end of management’s guidance, they came in slightly Price $1538.88 Price Target $2200.00 lower than market consensus. However, what trigger the sell-off in the shares was that Amazon’s Q4 2018 revenue guidance of 10-20% ($66.5B-$72.5B) was lower than Market Cap $752.46m expected. Shares in issue 487.7m Dividend Yield -- P/E 94.72x Although the lower guidance was the result of a $300mln headwind in Q4 2018 from an accounting change, with Prime subscription revenue now recognized on a straight 52-week 1086.87 – 2050.50 line basis over 12 months instead of with heavier allocation in Q4 2018 as was Range previously done. We recognize that Amazon shares are still up 30% YTD and there will be increased concerns around deceleration and future growth. We believe shares could remain under pressure near term as a result, but we think there is 4Q profit upside and potential for re-acceleration in 1Q19. We believe any pullback will prove to be a good buying opportunity. We continue to like Amazon because we strongly believe that its e-commerce and web services business (AWS) have further room to grow eCommerce – Amazon is the largest Internet retailer in the world as measured by revenue and market capitalization. We believe Amazon is well positioned as the market leader in eCommerce, where it’s still early days with US eCommerce representing circa 13% of adjusted retail sales (ex-gas, food, and autos), which we view as likely going to continue to increase over time. Amazon Web Services (AWS) – AWS at the moment only accounts for 10% of net sales. It offers a broad set of global cloud-based products including compute, storage, databases, analytics, networking, mobile, developer tools, management tools, IoT, security and enterprise applications. We believe the company has much further room to grow in this business segment which at the moment only contributed 10% of overall net sales. AWS is the leader in the public cloud with a circa 70% US market share. High AWS profitability gives us increased confidence in the business. Calamatta Cuschieri Research | Amazon Inc. EQUITY RESEARCH 30th October 2018 Valuation Our $2,200 based on our sum-of-the-parts analysis. We believe this methodology appropriately attributes value to the company’s large, fast-growing, and profitable AWS segment, in which Amazon continues to invest. E-commerce - We applied a 1.5x multiple on 2019E Gross Mercandise Value (GMV) of $449B, which we believe is justified as large retailer peer Walmart trades at circa 0.6x GMV and as Amazon has a meaningfully higher growth profile. AWS - We applied an 18x multiple on our 2020E AWS EBITDA of $23B, which is in-line with other Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) companies. We then reduced debt of €23.1bln and added back cash of €60.7bln before we divided by the number of shares outstanding to get our price target of $2200. What is Gross Merchandise Value (GMV)? Gross merchandise value is the total value of merchandise sold over a given period of time through a customer-to-customer exchange site. It is a measure of the growth of the business, or use of the site to sell merchandise owned by others. Gross merchandise value is one element of an e-commerce site's performance because the revenue of the business will be a function of gross merchandise sold and fees charged. Net sales breakdown Amazon rests on three main pillars, being Amazon Prime, Amazon Web Services (AWS), and Marketplace. It operates through three main segments: North America, International, and AWS. Net Sales - TTM Amazon Web Services, 10% $21,244 North America, 60% $125,642 International, 30% $61,239 Calamatta Cuschieri Research | Amazon Inc. EQUITY RESEARCH 30th October 2018 Second-Quarter Results Net Sales Operating Income $3,500 $2,983 $60,000 $3,000 $50,000 $2,500 $40,000 $2,000 $37,955 $30,000 $1,500 $52,886 $1,000 $628 $20,000 $500 $10,000 $0 $0 Q2 2017 Q2 2018 Net sales increased 39% to $52.9bn, compared with $38.0bn in the same quarter last year. Income from operations increased to $3.0bn, compared with $628m in Q2 2017. Net income amounted to $2.5bn, reaching $5.07 per diluted share, against the $0.4 per diluted share in the second quarter of 2017. Amazon's Net Revenue (2015-2018) (billions) $60.5 $51.0 $51.9 $43.7 $43.7 $38.0 $35.8 $35.7 $32.7 $29.1 $30.4 $25.4 $22.7 $23.2 Q3 2016 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017 Q1 2018 Q2 2018 Q1 2015 Looking at revenues generated by the firm every quarter, one can see significant growth, especially in the past year. The company sees a spike in revenues during the last quarter of every year, mainly attributable to the holidays and additional spending on gifts. Highlights Amazon Music has tens of millions of paid customers. New established brands were introduced on Prime Wardrobe in 2017. Introduction of Amazon Fashion in the US and expansion of Amazon Business to Italy and Spain. Calamatta Cuschieri Research | Amazon Inc. EQUITY RESEARCH 30th October 2018 Continuation of Whole Foods Market business, with expansion to more than 20 cities in the US. Established as the presenting sponsor of the 2018 Special Olympics USA Games Closing Ceremony. Hardware Sales It is believed that Alexa revenue could hit $15 billion in revenue in the next three years combined. Alexa-enabled devices have been the best-selling items across Amazon. Fire TV Sticks and Kids Edition Fire Tables this holiday season were purchased twice as much as the previous year. Continuous enhancement of Alexa capabilities and expansion into the hospitality business. The development and implementation of on-device fingerprint technique. Far-field speech recognition improved by 15% over the last year. In the US, UK, and Germany, Alexa’s spoken language has improved by more than 25% over the last 12 months. 2017 recorded Amazon’s biggest hardware sales. Echo and Alexa were launched in France; Echo Spot launched in India and Japan. Amazon also announced that Echo and Alexa are coming to Italy, Mexico, and Spain by 2018. Amazon Prime CEO Jeff Bezos recently announced that Amazon hit 100 million subscribers. In 2017, Amazon shipped more than 5bn items with Prime worldwide and more new members joined Prime than in any previous year, both worldwide and in the US. Expansion into Mexico, Singapore, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. Business Prime Shipping introduced to the US and Germany. Prime Free One-Day delivery available in more than 8,000 cities. In 2016, Prime’s penetration amounted to 40-60% of all US households, showing good potential for growth. Introduction to the monthly payment alternative, to attract lower-income shoppers into the program. Launch of Amazon Prime in Australia. Prime Day The fourth annual Prime Day was Amazon’s biggest global shopping event until Cyber Monday, welcoming more new Prime members on July 16th than any other previous day in Amazon history. Members purchased more than 100 million products. Small and medium-sized businesses selling on Amazon exceeded $1.5bn in sales. Global best-selling items: Fire TV Stick with Alexa Voice Remote; Echo Dot. Amazon Prime Video Amazon Prime Video received 22 Emmy nominations for its original programming. Calamatta Cuschieri Research | Amazon Inc. EQUITY RESEARCH 30th October 2018 Renewal of its streaming partnership with the NFL and announcement that Premier League football matches will be available in the UK in 2019 at no extra cost to Prime members. It continues to launch Original Series around the world, including India, Mexico, and Japan. Addition of new award-winning shows and new seasons of existing ones. Amazon Web Services $20bn annual revenue run rate and accelerating innovation in areas like machine learning, artificial intelligence, and Internet of Things. The division grew 49% year-over-year; becoming the biggest contributor to Amazon’s net income. Announcement of over 1,400 features last year, such as Amazon SageMaker. An increase of 250% over the last year of active users working with AWS machine learning services. New enterprise customers during the quarter, including Ryanair. Other entities are choosing to work with AWS, including 21st Century Fox, Verizon, Major League Baseball, and Formula One. Announcement of DeepLens and Amazon Sumerian; Amazon QuickSight becomes the first business intelligence service with pay-per-session pricing. Marketplace Half of the units sold last year on Amazon worldwide were from third-party sellers like small- and medium-sized businesses. Customers ordered over 40 million items from SMBs worldwide during Prime Day 2017, up more than 60% over Prime Day 2016. Over 140,000 SMBs surpassed $100,000 in royalties through Kindle Direct Publishing. Market Share Amazon has grown into an international e-commerce company with separate retail websites in North America and international markets. Its audience reach is substantial: during 2016, 82% of internet users in the UK accessed Amazon’s e- retailing services within a month. As of December 2017, Amazon.com had generated over 3 billion website visits across all devices.
Recommended publications
  • Walmart Inc. Takes on Amazon.Com
    For the exclusive use of Q. Mays, 2020. 9-718-481 REV: JANUARY 21, 2020 DAVID COLLIS ANDY WU REMBRAND KONING HUAIYI CICI SUN Walmart Inc. Takes on Amazon.com At the start of 2018, Walmart faced critical decisions about its future as e-commerce continued to explode. Walmart just lost its long-held crown as the most valuable retailer in the world to online leader Amazon. With Amazon’s recent acquisition of Whole Foods for $13 billion, Amazon moved aggressively into the offline world to challenge Walmart in its biggest business, grocery. Walmart was not standing still, making moves like buying Jet.com for $3 billion in 2016. While Walmart’s U.S. e- commerce revenues grew to $11.5 billion in 2017, there was no debate in Bentonville, AR: Walmart remained far behind. The question for Walmart CEO Doug McMillon and Walmart.com head Marc Lore was how to respond to its most aggressive competitor ever (Exhibits 1a and 1b).1 Amazon The Early Years (1994–2001) Jeff Bezos founded Amazon in 1994 to exploit the Internet, still a relatively nascent technology. He determined that selling books online was most promising, because the number of titles available was greater than even the largest brick-and-mortar store could stock. Bezos and his wife drove west to start “Earth’s Biggest Bookstore” in Seattle, WA. Amazon offered 1 million titles for sale on its opening day in July 1995. Next year, the company had over 2.5 million book titles for sale, with revenue doubling every quarter (Exhibit 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Plan for Attracting the Top Tech Companies to GM
    Targeting Plan for Attracting the Top Tech Companies to GM Andrew Toolan, Head of Creative Digital and Tech, MIDAS September 2018 Contents Executive Summary……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….p1 Which Companies to Target ……………………………………………………………………………………………….p2 Top 21 Companies……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….p3 Type of Information Researched………………………………………………………………………………………….p4 Other Tech Targeting Campaigns……………………………………………………………………………………….p7 Planning Stages and Deadlines…..……………………………………………………………………………………….p9 Appendix: Company Profiles: GAFAM……………………………….………………………………………………………………….p10 Company Profiles: NATU…………………………….……………………………………………………………………….p31 Company Profiles: BAT…………………………….…………………………………………………………………………..p48 Company Profiles: Forbes 2018 List………………………………..…………………………………………………..p61 Executive Summary This paper sets out a plan for building more strategic relationships between Greater The new opportunities could come from innovation driven projects that address a company’s Manchester (GM) and the worlds largest tech companies. The aim is that closer collaboration focus, areas of interest and their challenges. It could also come via market opportunities by will ultimately lead to increased levels of partnerships, investment and job creation. partnering with GM and its various institutions on areas such as ‘digitisation and delivery of public services’. These opportunities will be positioned with the inward investment pitch but MIDAS have selected 21 companies that in 2018, were either the largest tech firms by market help GM stand out from our competitor locations by being more tailored to company needs. capitalisation, major brands or the key employers/job creators within their sector. In order to This Top 21 campaign will run in parallel (and compliment) other tech targeting campaigns develop a more strategic approach we need to get a better understanding of these such as the CDT Sub-Sector Campaign; NexGen Campaign and Emerging Tech/Data City companies in terms of their goals, challenges and areas of focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon's Initiative Transforming a Non-Contact Society
    Technology in Society 65 (2021) 101596 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Technology in Society journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/techsoc Amazon’s initiative transforming a non-contact society - Digital disruptionleads the way to stakeholder capitalization Chihiro Watanabe a,b,*, Waleed Akhtar a, Yuji Tou c, Pekka Neittaanmaki¨ a a Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyvaskyl¨ a,¨ Finland b International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria c Dept. of Ind. Engineering & Magm., Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Contrary to the decisive role of R&D centered on information and communication technology (ICT) in the digital Advanced digital fashion economy, its excessive expansion has resulted in declining productivity due to the two-faced nature of ICT. Amazon Consequently, the novel concept emerges of innovation that maintains sustainable growth by harnessing the Learning orchestration externality vigor of soft innovation resources (SIRs). Stakeholder capitalism Pioneering endeavors can be observed at the forefront of the global ICT leaders. World R&D leader Amazon Non-contact society has been harnessing the power of users that seek SIRs. This functions as a virtuous cycle, leading to the trans­ formation of R&D by fusing a unique R&D system with a sophisticated financingsystem. With this orchestration, Amazon leverages the expectations of a wide range of stakeholders, and takes the initiative of stakeholder capitalism in which stakeholders bet on Amazon’s prospecting future. This paper attempts to elucidate the driving force of this notable accomplishment, taking Amazon’s recent challenge in developing advanced digital fashions (ADFs) successively as prospecting SIRs.
    [Show full text]
  • Mergers in the Digital Economy
    2020/01 DP Axel Gautier and Joe Lamesch Mergers in the digital economy CORE Voie du Roman Pays 34, L1.03.01 B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve Tel (32 10) 47 43 04 Email: [email protected] https://uclouvain.be/en/research-institutes/ lidam/core/discussion-papers.html Mergers in the Digital Economy∗ Axel Gautier y& Joe Lamesch z January 13, 2020 Abstract Over the period 2015-2017, the five giant technologically leading firms, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft (GAFAM) acquired 175 companies, from small start-ups to billion dollar deals. By investigating this intense M&A, this paper ambitions a better understanding of the Big Five's strategies. To do so, we identify 6 different user groups gravitating around these multi-sided companies along with each company's most important market segments. We then track their mergers and acquisitions and match them with the segments. This exercise shows that these five firms use M&A activity mostly to strengthen their core market segments but rarely to expand their activities into new ones. Furthermore, most of the acquired products are shut down post acquisition, which suggests that GAFAM mainly acquire firm’s assets (functionality, technology, talent or IP) to integrate them in their ecosystem rather than the products and users themselves. For these tech giants, therefore, acquisition appears to be a substitute for in-house R&D. Finally, from our check for possible "killer acquisitions", it appears that just a single one in our sample could potentially be qualified as such. Keywords: Mergers, GAFAM, platform, digital markets, competition policy, killer acquisition JEL Codes: D43, K21, L40, L86, G34 ∗The authors would like to thank M.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Wirelessreport
    Week Ending: Weekly Wireless Report October 6, 2017 This Week’s Stories Netflix Ups U.S. Fees For First Time Since 2015 Inside This Issue: October 5, 2017 This Week’s Stories Netflix Inc’s U.S. business announced the first rises in monthly fees in two years on Thursday, hiking Netflix Ups U.S. Fees For First costs for two of its three main subscription plans as it spends heavily on its own original content. Time Since 2015 The company's mid-range plan, which allows streaming on two devices at the same time, was increased to $10.99 per month from $9.99. AT&T CEO Makes The Case For Aquiring Time Warner The top-tier plan, which allows streaming on four screens in high definition, was raised to $13.99 per month from $11.99. The basic plan fee remained at $7.99. Comcast’s Skinny Bundle: Internet But No Cable? Meet Shares in the global streaming pioneer rose as much as 4.5 percent to a record high of $192.80. Xfinity Instant TV “Most investors believe that Netflix is priced well below its value to consumers and want to see the Products & Services management continue to increase monetization,” Rob Sanderson analyst at MKM Partners said. Google Pixel Buds Are Wireless Earbuds That Translate Conversations in Real Time In 2011, Netflix raised prices for some customers by as much as $6, causing more than 800,000 U.S. subscribers to desert the service. Need To Quick Charge Your iPhone? Grab This iPad Adaptor A more gradual move in 2014 did not provoke the same outrage.
    [Show full text]
  • Cesifo Working Paper No. 8056
    8056 2020 January 2020 Mergers in the Digital Economy Axel Gautier, Joe Lamesch Impressum: CESifo Working Papers ISSN 2364-1428 (electronic version) Publisher and distributor: Munich Society for the Promotion of Economic Research - CESifo GmbH The international platform of Ludwigs-Maximilians University’s Center for Economic Studies and the ifo Institute Poschingerstr. 5, 81679 Munich, Germany Telephone +49 (0)89 2180-2740, Telefax +49 (0)89 2180-17845, email [email protected] Editor: Clemens Fuest www.cesifo-group.org/wp An electronic version of the paper may be downloaded · from the SSRN website: www.SSRN.com · from the RePEc website: www.RePEc.org · from the CESifo website: www.CESifo-group.org/wp CESifo Working Paper No. 8056 Mergers in the Digital Economy Abstract Over the period 2015-2017, the five giant technologically leading firms, Google, Amazon, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft (GAFAM) acquired 175 companies, from small start-ups to billion dollar deals. By investigating this intense M&A, this paper ambitions a better understanding of the Big Five’s strategies. To do so, we identify 6 different user groups gravitating around these multi-sided companies along with each company’s most important market segments. We then track their mergers and acquisitions and match them with the segments. This exercise shows that these five firms use M&A activity mostly to strengthen their core market segments but rarely to expand their activities into new ones. Furthermore, most of the acquired products are shut down post acquisition, which suggests that GAFAM mainly acquire firm’s assets (functionality, technology, talent or IP) to integrate them in their ecosystem rather than the products and users themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Merger Policy in Digital Markets: an Ex Post Assessment 3 Study Is to Undertake a Less Common Form of Ex Post Assessment
    Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 00(00), 1–46 doi: 10.1093/joclec/nhaa020 MERGER POLICY IN DIGITAL MARKETS: AN EX Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcle/advance-article/doi/10.1093/joclec/nhaa020/5874037 by guest on 18 December 2020 POST ASSESSMENT† Elena Argentesi,∗Paolo Buccirossi,†Emilio Calvano,‡ Tomaso Duso,§,∗ & Alessia Marrazzo,¶ & Salvatore Nava† ABSTRACT This paper presents a broad retrospective evaluation of mergers and merger decisions in markets dominated by multisided digital platforms. First, we doc- ument almost 300 acquisitions carried out by three major tech companies— Amazon, Facebook, and Google—between 2008 and 2018. We cluster target companies on their area of economic activity providing suggestive evidence on the strategies behind these mergers. Second, we discuss the features of digital markets that create new challenges for competition policy. By using relevant case studies as illustrative examples, we discuss theories of harm that have been used or, alternatively, could have been formulated by authorities in these cases. Finally, we retrospectively examine two important merger cases, Facebook/Instagram and Google/Waze, providing a systematic assessment of the theories of harm considered by the UK competition authorities as well as evidence on the evolution of the market after the transactions were approved. We discuss whether the competition authority performed complete and careful analyses to foresee the competitive consequences of the investigated mergers and whether a more effective merger control regime can be achieved within the current legal framework. JEL codes: L4; K21 ∗ Department of Economics, University of Bologna † Lear, Rome ‡ Department of Economics, University of Bologna, Toulouse School of Economics and CEPR, London § Deutsches Institut fuer Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW Berlin), Department of Economics, Tech- nical University (TU) Berlin, CEPR, London and CESifo, Munich ¶ Lear, Rome and Department of Economics, University of Bologna ∗ Corresponding author.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon's Initiative Transforming a Non-Contact Society
    Technology in Society 65 (2021) 101596 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Technology in Society journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/techsoc Amazon’s initiative transforming a non-contact society - Digital disruptionleads the way to stakeholder capitalization Chihiro Watanabe a,b,*, Waleed Akhtar a, Yuji Tou c, Pekka Neittaanmaki¨ a a Faculty of Information Technology, University of Jyvaskyl¨ a,¨ Finland b International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria c Dept. of Ind. Engineering & Magm., Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Contrary to the decisive role of R&D centered on information and communication technology (ICT) in the digital Advanced digital fashion economy, its excessive expansion has resulted in declining productivity due to the two-faced nature of ICT. Amazon Consequently, the novel concept emerges of innovation that maintains sustainable growth by harnessing the Learning orchestration externality vigor of soft innovation resources (SIRs). Stakeholder capitalism Pioneering endeavors can be observed at the forefront of the global ICT leaders. World R&D leader Amazon Non-contact society has been harnessing the power of users that seek SIRs. This functions as a virtuous cycle, leading to the trans­ formation of R&D by fusing a unique R&D system with a sophisticated financingsystem. With this orchestration, Amazon leverages the expectations of a wide range of stakeholders, and takes the initiative of stakeholder capitalism in which stakeholders bet on Amazon’s prospecting future. This paper attempts to elucidate the driving force of this notable accomplishment, taking Amazon’s recent challenge in developing advanced digital fashions (ADFs) successively as prospecting SIRs.
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Vs Alibaba M&A Activity Comparison Between Two E-Commerce Giants
    An Acuris Company AMAZON VS ALIBABA M&A ACTIVITY COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO E-COMMERCE GIANTS As the technology battle between the US and China heats up, Mergermarket compares the gargantuan players’ M&A strategies since 2012 - by industry, by size, and by influence. DEAL VALUE - 2018 US$ 7.5bn US$ 14.3bn 2017 US$ 9.2bn - 2016 US$ 13.8bn US$ 646m 2015 US$ 18.0bn US$ 990m 2014 US$ 5.3bn US$ 176m 2013 US$ 1.5bn US$ 775m 2012 US$ 20m Disclaimer: the majority of Amazon’s deals have undisclosed deal value DEAL COUNT 2 2018 11 9 2017 37 7 2016 24 5 2015 28 5 2014 26 7 2013 11 1 2012 2 AMAZON ALIBABA GROUP Amazon's acquisitions have mostly been within the US and Alibaba's acquisitions have been mostly in China, and also primarily in the technology sector, with a few notable exceptions predominantly in the technology sector. However, last year, it such as the 2017 purchase of Whole Foods Markets. In 2016, really ramped up its presence in artificial intelligence (AI) with Amazon made strategic acquisitions in India to establish its pres- five deals. Alibaba has often dipped into multiple sectors, rang- ence in the region, acquiring a 74% stake in a media publisher ing from logistics, supermarkets and cinemas. Westland Publications as well as in regional e-commerce compa- nies - QwikCilver and EMVantage Payments. Most recently, Amazon acquired IoT company Ring, a US-based developer of Data run from 01/01/2012 to 03/30/2018 'smart' doorbells. INTELLIGENCE PillPack could attract under USD 1bn offer from 03 18 Carrefour denies report on sale of China business
    [Show full text]
  • Amazon Strategy Teardown
    Amazon Strategy Teardown AMAZON’S BARRELING INTO PHYSICAL RETAIL, FINANCIAL SERVICES, HEALTHCARE, AND AI-LED COMPUTING 1 Seattle-based Amazon is doubling down on AI for AWS and the ecosystem around its AI assistant, Alexa. It’s seeking to become the central provider for AI-as-a-service. But it’s not leaving retail behind either, running grocery, book, and convenience stores across the US. Amazon is the exception to nearly every rule in business. Rising from humble beginnings as a Seattle-based internet bookstore, Amazon has grown into a propulsive force across at least 5 major industries: retail, logistics, consumer technology, cloud computing, and most recently, media & entertainment. Notably, Amazon’s $13.7B purchase of grocery chain Whole Foods last year shook up the grocery industry, highlighting Amazon’s increasingly deep push into brick-and-mortar retail. Of course, the company has had its share of missteps — the expensive Fire phone flop comes to mind — but Amazon is also rightly known for strokes of strategic genius that have launched it ahead of competitors in promising new industries. This was the case with the launch of cloud business AWS in the mid-2000s, as well as the more recent consumer hit Amazon found with its Echo device and Alexa AI assistant. Today’s Amazon is far more than just an “everything store;” it’s a leader in consumer-facing AI and enterprise cloud services. And its insatiable appetite for new markets means competitors must always be on guard against its next moves. As the United States’ biggest online retailer, the company accounts for about 4% of all retail and about 44% of all e-com- merce spending in the US.
    [Show full text]
  • Entering New Markets and Diversifying Business the Role of Amazon’S Acquisitions in International Growth and Development
    No. 69 – August 2019 Entering New Markets and Diversifying Business The Role of Amazon’s Acquisitions in International Growth and Development Stefan Schmid Sebastian Baldermann No. 69 – August 2019 Entering New Markets and Diversifying Business The Role of Amazon’s Acquisitions in International Growth and Development Stefan Schmid Sebastian Baldermann AUTHORS Prof. Dr. Stefan Schmid Chair of International Management and Strategic Management ESCP Europe Business School Berlin Heubnerweg 8-10, 14059 Berlin Germany T: +49 (0) 30 / 3 20 07-136 F: +49 (0) 30 / 3 20 07-107 [email protected] Sebastian Baldermann, M.A. ISSN: 1869-5426 Department of International Management and Strategic Management EDITOR ESCP Europe Business School Berlin © ESCP Europe Wirtschaftshochschule Berlin Heubnerweg 8-10, 14059 Berlin Heubnerweg 8-10, 14059 Berlin, Germany Germany T: +49 (0) 30 / 3 20 07-0 T: +49 (0) 30 / 3 20 07-191 F: +49 (0) 30 / 3 20 07-111 F: +49 (0) 30 / 3 20 07-107 [email protected] [email protected] www.escpeurope.eu ESCP Europe, Working Paper No. 69 – 08/19 ABSTRACT: E-commerce has grown considerably in recent decades and has had a disruptive impact on the retail industry. In this context, Amazon, one of the major players in (online) retailing and beyond, has been able to expand its business activities continuously in many countries. The present case study sheds light on the internationalization of Amazon, with a particular focus on the company’s acquisitions. The study illustrates that Amazon’s acquisitions over the last decades had two major objectives. First, acquisitions helped Amazon enter new markets and strengthen its presence in specific regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Amazon: Making the 21St-Century Gatekeeper Safe For
    Understanding Amazon: #5 POWER CORPORATE ON SERIES PAPER WORKING Making the 21st-Century Gatekeeper Safe for Democracy Pat Garofalo Matt Stoller Olivia Webb July 2020 AMERICAN ECONOMIC LIBERTIES PROJECT economicliberties.us ABOUT THE AUTHORS PAT GAROFALO Pat Garofalo is the Director of State and Local Policy at the American Economic Liberties Project. Pat is the author of The Billionaire Boondoggle: How Our Politicians Let Corporations and Bigwigs Steal Our Money and Jobs. Prior to joining Economic Liberties, Pat served as managing editor for Talk Poverty at the Center for American Progress. Previously, Pat was assistant managing editor for opinion at U.S. News & World Report and economic policy editor at ThinkProgress, and his work has also appeared in The Atlantic, The Nation, The Guardian, and The Week, among others. MATT STOLLER Matt Stoller is the Director of Research at the American Economic Liberties Project. He is the author of the Simon and Schuster book Goliath: The Hundred Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy, which Business Insider called “one of the year’s best books on how to rethink capitalism and improve the economy.” Stoller is a former policy advisor to the Senate Budget Committee and also worked for a member of the Financial Services Committee in the U.S. House of Representatives during the financial crisis. His 2012 law review article on the foreclosure crisis, “The Housing Crash and the End of American Citizenship,” predicted the rise of autocratic political forces, and his 2016 Atlantic article, “How the Democrats Killed their Populist Soul,” helped inspire the new anti-monopoly movement.
    [Show full text]