DOCSLIB.ORG

The Bbc and 'Europe'

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Bbc and 'Europe' THE BBC AND ‘EUROPE’ ANALYSIS OF EU COVERAGE ON BBC RADIO 4's TODAY PROGRAMME 9 APRIL – 30 JUNE 2012 SUMMARY – Survey of BBC Radio 4 Today Programme 9 APRIL – 30 JUNE 2012 • The proportion of speakers who were clearly identified as eurosceptic was lower than in any of the eighteen previous Newswatch surveys. 99 guests (27%) spoke in favour of the EU or specific legislation, 60 (16%) were against the EU or specific legislation, and 207 speakers (57%) offered a neutral, factual or unclassifiable viewpoint. • This bias was compounded by that the programme rarely mounted coverage which genuinely investigated matters from the eurosceptic perspective. The expression of eurosceptic opinion amounted to only around 50 instances in 18 hours of EU coverage, most of them incidental comments. There were only a handful of interviews with those who were advocating a radical reappraisal or criticism of EU policy, compared to at least 20 alone on the subject of banking and fiscal union. • Those who could be defined as ‘robust’ eurosceptic – figures such as the Conservative backbench MP, Mark Reckless, who has stated publicly that he wants a radical re-shaping of the relationship with Brussels, including a referendum on the subject of ‘in or out’ – also made a very low level of appearances. There were no appearances by eurosceptic members of the Labour Party. The combined input of ‘robust’ eurosceptics was around 1,661 words. There were only four relatively short interviews with them – three with Lord Lamont and one with Mr Reckless. • No ‘robust’ eurosceptic was interviewed about the subject of a referendum on EU membership. The only figures that were Kenneth Clarke, who stated the idea was preposterous, and Lord Owen, who – although arguing that radical organisation of the EU was required to protect the single market – said he was a firm supporter of the acquis communautaire and the principle of continued UK membership. • Although a number of senior Conservative Party figures appeared on the programme, and they were asked about whether there should be a referendum on the changes in the eurozone, all of them said baldly this was not necessary because of the referendum ‘lock’. In balance terms, this made the absence of ‘robust’ eurosceptics even more puzzling – and especially so because all the senior Conservatives argued at length on the programme that closer integration of the eurozone was essential. • Labour figures who appeared, such as Chuka Umunna and Alistair Darling, made sweeping claims about the failure of ‘austerity’ policies, that they were fuelling a growth in right wing parties, and it was claimed that 3m UK jobs depended on the EU. Such views were not balanced by appearances from eurosceptics or sufficiently challenged by Today’s presenters. • Relatively few UK politicians figured in the EU coverage during the survey. There were more appearances by European politicians and EU officials. This created its own imbalance because all those who appeared from ‘Europe’ were broadly in favour of the EU and its policies. Those from Greece, for example, while they may have wanted a radical re-drafting of their bailout, were unanimously in favour of remaining in the eurozone. • The programme devoted 14.6% of its output to EU affairs, double the long term average. The coverage focused very heavily on the unfolding problems of the eurozone – and only eight and a half minutes per week dealt with other EU issues, equating to just 1.3% of Today’s available output. Only 9.4% of Today’s EU coverage focused on issues other than eurozone economics. In consequence, many EU-related matters of significant concern to the UK were seriously under-reported. A proposed 6.8% increase in the European Commission budget, for example, was deemed to merit only one short interview (with a Commission spokesman, who of course supported it). A proposed major overhaul in fisheries quotas ignored the eurosceptic perspective and had only minimal input from representatives of UK fishermen. • The EU ‘summit’ at the end of the period adopted measures towards further banking union as a solution to the eurozone crisis. Throughout the period, Today included contributions – some of them lengthy interviews – with speakers who favoured this approach. Proponents encompassed senior Labour and Conservative politicians, various EU figures, and a range of experts and commentators who appeared especially in the Business News sections. In contrast, there were only two contributors – their appearances both very brief - who disagreed with banking union. • Today projected in most of the coverage that the main battle of the period was between ’austerity; - as advocated especially by Angela Merkel, who was dubbed ‘the Iron Lady’ by BBC presenters – and ‘growth’, as championed by the British Labour Party, Greek left, President Obama and Francois Hollande. Programme coverage brought numerous examples of why ‘austerity’ was not working including a range of special reports chronicling suicide and hardship from Greece. Labour figures were given space to attack at length ‘anti-growth’ policies. But throughout the entire period, there was only one interview – with the German MP Michael Fuchs – with someone who thought that it was a valid policy, and no attempt to explore the eurosceptic viewpoint that unrealistic fiscal expectations had created inbuilt problems with the euro from the outset. The impression was strongly conveyed that the Today programme was a supporter of ‘growth’ rather than austerity. • Analysis of a range of EU-related topics covered by the programme – such as an Interview with Lord Mandelson, an examination of a claim by the European Commission of back duties on UK imports of garlic from China, the resignation of the Dutch government and the 6.8% budget rise being sought by the European Commission – also shows in microcosm the marked bias by Today against considering eurosceptic opinion. • A poll carried out on May 20 for the Independent on Sunday showed that amid the tumultuous events affecting the eurozone during this period, 46% of the UK population wanted to leave the EU. But despite this, only three speakers on Today were identifiably supporters of withdrawal. This was 0.8% of the total contributors. Only the survey undertaken one year previously, in summer 2011, yielded a lower figure. • Longer-term trends confirm that Today seriously under-reports withdrawal opinion. Since the publication of Lord Wilson’s report into the BBC coverage of the EU in 2005, Newswatch has monitored 1073 editions of Today, about half of those broadcast, covering three and a half years. In those programmes those clearly supporting withdrawal have been asked only 20 questions about the subject – that’s one question about withdrawal for every 54 editions (nine weeks) or every 153 programme hours. • Those who appeared who supported withdrawal were Nigel Farage – who was interviewed once and contributed a 90 word soundbite – and a vox contributor from Brussels. The combined contribution was 768 words, or 0.9% - less than one hundredth - of the total words spoken about the EU during the survey period. THE BBC’s TODAY PROGRAMME AND ‘EUROPE’ PART ONE: SUMMER 2012 MONITORING STATISTICS This survey investigates the Today programme’s coverage of EU news and current affairs over a twelve-week interval between Monday 9 April and Saturday 30 June 2012. Newswatch monitored and analysed all 72 editions in their entirety.. All programme items were timed and logged, and all items that had relevance to the European Union, or its relationship with the UK, were fully transcribed and subsequently analysed on a line-by-line basis. Information was collated in Newswatch’s bespoke database to analyse coverage patterns and to enable comparisons with data collected during the eighteen previous Newswatch projects undertaken since 2002. This methodology allows for weaknesses in individual programme items to be explored in detail, and also for longer-term trends and imbalances to be identified and investigated. 1.1 OVERVIEW Today is BBC Radio 4’s flagship news and current affairs programme. It broadcasts for three hours each weekday morning, and for two hours each Saturday. Each edition is also made available ‘on demand’ for those visiting the programme’s dedicated website and through the BBC iPlayer, and selections are included in a ‘Best of Today’ podcast.. The Today website also features an audio archive, containing programme material dating back to June 2003. RAJAR figures reveal that Today had a weekly audience reach of 6.76 million listeners during the second quarter of 2012 – the period 2nd April - 24th June. This was an increase of 100,000 listeners on the first quarter, but 400,000 down on the same quarter in 2011. 1.2 AIRTIME Newswatch’s airtime calculations focus on ‘feature reports’, to ensure totals are not affected by repeated content such as bulletins and newspaper reviews and ‘non-news’ items such as sport, weather and trailers for other Radio 4 programmes. The total space available on Today for features during the Summer 2012 survey interval was 132 hours and 50 minutes. Of this, 18 hours and 32 minutes – 14% of the total available airtime – was EU-related. All EU material broadcast during the survey was fully transcribed, categorised and analysed. These transcripts had a combined length of 269,000 words. Since 1999, Newswatch has monitored, tracked and analysed Today for 293 weeks, which equates to 1834 individual editions with a combined airtime of 4981 hours. This has generated over seven thousand EU transcripts, running to over 4 million words of broadcast output. This long-term monitoring has established that Today has, on average, devoted 6.4% of its ‘feature’ output to the discussion of EU themes. During the Summer 2012 interval, EU coverage was more than twice the long-term average, and the second highest of any Newswatch survey interval.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Owner and Publisher/ Sahibi Ve Yayıncısı: Assoc.Prof.Dr./ Doç.Dr Fikret BİRDİŞLİ
    Volume: 2, Number: 4-2020 (Special Issue for China) / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 4-2020 Owner and Publisher/ Sahibi ve Yayıncısı: Assoc.Prof.Dr./ Doç.Dr Fikret BİRDİŞLİ EDITOR-IN-CHIEF/ EDİTOR Assoc. Prof.Dr. Fikret BİRDİŞLİ İnönü University, Center for Strategic Researches (INUSAM), 44280, Malatya-TURKEY Phone: +90 422 3774261/4383 E-mail [email protected] MANAGING EDITORS / ALAN EDİTÖRLERİ Political Science Editor/ Siyaset Bilimi Editörü Prof.Dr. Ahmet Karadağ İnönü University, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Department of International Relations, 44280, Malatya-TURKEY Phone: +90 422 3774288 E-mail [email protected] International Relations and Security Studies Editor/ Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Güvenlik Çalışmaları Editörü Assoc.Prof.Dr. Fikret Birdişli İnönü University, Center for Strategic Researches (INUSAM), 44280, Malatya-TURKEY Phone: +90 422 3774261/4383 E-mail [email protected] CONTAC INFORMATION / İLETİŞİM BİLGİLERİ İnönü University, Center for Strategic Researches (INUSAM), 44280, Malatya-TURKEY Phone: +90 422 3774261 İnönü Üniversitesi, Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi, İİBF Ek Bina, Kat:3, 44280, Malatya-TÜRKİYE SPECIAL ISSUE FOR CHINA IJPS, 2019; 2(4) International Journal of Politics and Security, 2019: 2(4) 2020, 2 (4), / Volume: 2, Number: 4-2020 OWNER / SAHİBİ/ Assoc. Prof.Dr. Fikret BİRDİŞLİ Managing Editors / Editörler Political Science Editor: Ahmet Karadağ International Relations and Security Studies Editor: Fikret Birdişli Editorial Assistance / Editör Yardımcıları English Language
    [Show full text]
  • What to Expect from Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's U.S. Visit
    What to Expect from Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s U.S. Visit By Caroline Wadhams and Aarthi Gunasekaran September 25, 2013 Despite ongoing turmoil in the Middle East, the Obama administration continues its steady pursuit of a foreign policy makeover, reorienting its attention and resources to the Asia-Pacific—specifically India. Following a number of high-level visits by American officials to India, including Vice President Joe Biden’s trip in July and Secretary of State John Kerry’s trip in June, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh will meet with President Barack Obama tomorrow during his second official trip to Washington as prime minister.1 During the meeting, President Obama and Prime Minister Singh will likely focus on the following six issues in the U.S.-India relationship: • Trade and investment • Defense cooperation • The U.S.-India civil nuclear deal • Climate change and clean energy • Immigration reform • Security issues and the strategic partnership 1 Center for American Progress | What to Expect from Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s U.S. Visit For the Obama administration, underlying these discussions will be the unmet expecta- tions of the U.S.-India relationship, a relationship envisioned as the cornerstone of the U.S. rebalance to the Asia-Pacific. While there were high hopes following the U.S.-India civil nuclear deal in 2008 and Prime Minister Singh’s 2009 visit to Washington, many U.S. policymakers have been disappointed by the Indian government’s failure to deepen the partnership by implementing the civil nuclear deal, making India more open to investment opportunities for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 — 27 August 2018 See P91—137 — See Children’S Programme Gifford Baillie Thanks to All Our Sponsors and Supporters
    FREEDOM. 11 — 27 August 2018 Baillie Gifford Programme Children’s — See p91—137 Thanks to all our Sponsors and Supporters Funders Benefactors James & Morag Anderson Jane Attias Geoff & Mary Ball The BEST Trust Binks Trust Lel & Robin Blair Sir Ewan & Lady Brown Lead Sponsor Major Supporter Richard & Catherine Burns Gavin & Kate Gemmell Murray & Carol Grigor Eimear Keenan Richard & Sara Kimberlin Archie McBroom Aitken Professor Alexander & Dr Elizabeth McCall Smith Anne McFarlane Investment managers Ian Rankin & Miranda Harvey Lady Susan Rice Lord Ross Fiona & Ian Russell Major Sponsors The Thomas Family Claire & Mark Urquhart William Zachs & Martin Adam And all those who wish to remain anonymous SINCE Scottish Mortgage Investment Folio Patrons 909 1 Trust PLC Jane & Bernard Nelson Brenda Rennie And all those who wish to remain anonymous Trusts The AEB Charitable Trust Barcapel Foundation Binks Trust The Booker Prize Foundation Sponsors The Castansa Trust John S Cohen Foundation The Crerar Hotels Trust Cruden Foundation The Educational Institute of Scotland The Ettrick Charitable Trust The Hugh Fraser Foundation The Jasmine Macquaker Charitable Fund Margaret Murdoch Charitable Trust New Park Educational Trust Russell Trust The Ryvoan Trust The Turtleton Charitable Trust With thanks The Edinburgh International Book Festival is sited in Charlotte Square Gardens by the kind permission of the Charlotte Square Proprietors. Media Sponsors We would like to thank the publishers who help to make the Festival possible, Essential Edinburgh for their help with our George Street venues, the Friends and Patrons of the Edinburgh International Book Festival and all the Supporters other individuals who have donated to the Book Festival this year.
    [Show full text]
  • A-Level Economics
    A-Level Economics Contents 1. Welcome - Description of course - Link to Specification - Outline of what you will study 2. Getting Started - Macroeconomics and microeconomics - Some key terms 3. Next Steps - Introductory reading - Useful websites - The business cycle - Quantitative skills 4. Building Skills - Economic data - Working with data - Building up a chain of reasoning 5. A-Level-Ready - Extended economic analysis, using data and applying your knowledge - Task to submit 6. Extension Tasks - A range of options to develop your interests further 1. Welcome Welcome to the A level Economics course. Most students who choose to study A level Economics are new to the subject; no prior learning or knowledge of economics is required to be successful. The study of economics complements a range of other a level subjects, such as history, geography, business, mathematics and the Sciences, and the way of thinking that you will develop as you study economics will help you to interpret issues you meet in many of these subjects. Studying economics can provide you with important employability skills and is good preparation for those wishing to progress to higher education. If you are thinking about studying economics at university, it's a good idea to think about studying mathematics as one of your A levels. Economics is the study of how choices are made in the use of scarce resources to provide goods and services. Although you're not expected to know about the economy in detail at the start of the course, it won't all be new to you. Economics is largely about people and their economic choices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foreign Affairs Select Committee and UK Foreign Policy Written by Tom Pettinger
    The Foreign Affairs Select Committee and UK Foreign Policy Written by Tom Pettinger This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. The Foreign Affairs Select Committee and UK Foreign Policy https://www.e-ir.info/2012/03/11/the-foreign-affairs-select-committee-and-uk-foreign-policy/ TOM PETTINGER, MAR 11 2012 Has the Foreign Affairs Select Committee made a difference to UK Foreign Policy? Because the executive has held, and still holds, royal prerogative for foreign affairs matters, Parliament has been “unusually limited”[1] in its influence over the area.[2] Scrutiny of foreign policy is unique because unlike in other areas of governance “Parliament is in no sense a regular participant in the process, either by right or custom,”[3] and because there is so little legislation in comparison with other policy areas.[4] Before 1979, an amalgamation of committees existed under different departments, examining specific foreign affairs issues with no oversight of the whole of foreign policy. The establishment of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee (FAC) in 1979 brought an increase in Parliamentary influence in the area, by “[creating] a committee devoted primarily, indeed exclusively, to foreign affairs,”[5] and the Committee was given the role of scrutinising “administration and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO).”[6] An in-depth study by The Constitution Unit, however, found that the FAC provided the least substantive recommendations compared with other committees,[7] implying the Committee’s scrutiny role is somewhat hindered – possibly because the main parties’ front benches, to maintain one national voice on international affairs, withhold usual party politicking.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq: an Initial Assessment of Post- Conflict Operations
    House of Commons Defence Committee Iraq: An Initial Assessment of Post- Conflict Operations Sixth Report of Session 2004–05 Volume II Oral and Written Evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 16 March 2005 HC 65-II [Incorporating HC 721-i-ii, Session 2003–04] Published on 24 March 2005 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £16.50 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current Membership Mr Bruce George MP (Labour, Walsall South) (Chairman) Mr James Cran MP (Conservative, Beverley and Holderness) Mr David Crausby MP (Labour, Bolton North East) Mike Gapes MP (Labour, Ilford South) Mr Mike Hancock CBE MP (Liberal Democrat, Portsmouth South) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, North Durham) Richard Ottaway MP (Conservative, Croydon South) Mr Frank Roy MP (Labour, Motherwell and Wishaw) Rachel Squire MP (Labour, Dunfermline West) Mr Peter Viggers MP (Conservative, Gosport) The following Member was also a member of the Committee during the period covered by this report. Mr Crispin Blunt MP (Conservative, Reigate) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Cheltlf12 Brochure
    SponSorS & SupporterS Title sponsor In association with Broadcast Partner Principal supporters Global Banking Partner Major supporters Radio Partner Festival Partners Official Wine Working in partnership Official Cider 2 The Times Cheltenham Literature Festival dIREctor Festival Assistant Jane Furze Hannah Evans Artistic dIREctor Festival INTERNS Sarah Smyth Lizzie Atkinson, Jen Liggins BOOK IT! dIREctor development dIREctor Jane Churchill Suzy Hillier Festival Managers development OFFIcER Charles Haynes, Nicola Tuxworth Claire Coleman Festival Co-ORdinator development OFFIcER Rose Stuart Alison West Welcome what words will you use to describe your festival experience? Whether it’s Jazz, Science, Music or Literature, a Cheltenham Festival experience can be intellectually challenging, educational, fun, surprising, frustrating, shocking, transformational, inspiring, comical, beautiful, odd, even life-changing. And this year’s The Times Cheltenham Literature Festival is no different. As you will see when you browse this brochure, the Festival promises Contents 10 days of discussion, debate and interview, plus lots of new ways to experience and engage with words and ideas. It’s a true celebration of 2012 NEWS 3 - 9 the power of the word - with old friends, new writers, commentators, What’s happening at this year’s Festival celebrities, sports people and scientists, and from children’s authors, illustrators, comedians and politicians to leading opinion-formers. FESTIVAL PROGRAMME 10 - 89 Your day by day guide to events I can’t praise the team enough for their exceptional dedication and flair in BOOK IT! 91 - 101 curating this year’s inspiring programme. However, there would be no Festival Our Festival for families and without the wonderful enthusiasm of our partners and loyal audiences and we young readers are extremely grateful for all the support we receive.
    [Show full text]
  • John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey D. Sachs
    2018 John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey D. Sachs Table of Contents World Happiness Report 2018 Editors: John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard, and Jeffrey D. Sachs Associate Editors: Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, Haifang Huang and Shun Wang 1 Happiness and Migration: An Overview . 3 John F. Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey D. Sachs 2 International Migration and World Happiness . 13 John F. Helliwell, Haifang Huang, Shun Wang and Hugh Shiplett 3 Do International Migrants Increase Their Happiness and That of Their Families by Migrating? . 45 Martijn Hendriks, Martijn J. Burger, Julie Ray and Neli Esipova 4 Rural-Urban Migration and Happiness in China . 67 John Knight and Ramani Gunatilaka 5 Happiness and International Migration in Latin America . 89 Carol Graham and Milena Nikolova 6 Happiness in Latin America Has Social Foundations . 115 Mariano Rojas 7 America’s Health Crisis and the Easterlin Paradox . 146 Jeffrey D. Sachs Annex: Migrant Acceptance Index: Do Migrants Have Better Lives in Countries That Accept Them? . 160 Neli Esipova, Julie Ray, John Fleming and Anita Pugliese The World Happiness Report was written by a group of independent experts acting in their personal capacities. Any views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of any organization, agency or programme of the United Nations. 2 Chapter 1 3 Happiness and Migration: An Overview John F. Helliwell, Vancouver School of Economics at the University of British Columbia, and Canadian Institute for Advanced Research Richard Layard, Wellbeing Programme, Centre for Economic Performance, at the London School of Economics and Political Science Jeffrey D. Sachs, Director, SDSN, and Director, Center for Sustainable Development, Columbia University The authors are grateful to the Ernesto Illy Foundation and the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research for research support, and to Gallup for data access and assistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Events Open to the Lse Community And
    EVENTS OPEN TO THE LSE COMMUNITY AND THE PUBLIC to 6 September December 2019 20 Finance Most finance professionals can drive the car... But do they understand how the engine works? At LSE, we believe in understanding why things work. We take you below the surface to understand the fundamentals of finance, giving you the tools to accelerate your career in a changing marketplace. MSc Finance (Part-time) The MSc Finance (Part-time) is LSE’s most established Executive Master’s programme. Taught in the evenings, it provides a unique opportunity for busy professionals to combine a full-time career with the opportunity to study a world- class MSc Finance programme that is grounded in academic depth and rigour. Join us for an Information Evening or a one-to-one session to discuss your application. Register at lse.ac.uk/finance 19_0577 FinanceAdvert_Events.indd 1 07/08/2019 15:29 Finance WELCOME Everyone is welcome to attend LSE’s public events, where some of the Most finance professionals can drive the car... most influential figures in the social sciences can be heard. Events are generally free and open to all, with entry on a first come, first But do they understand served basis – unless otherwise stated. It does get busy so we advise people to turn up 20 minutes before the advertised time. For ticketed events, please go to lse.ac.uk/events and fill in the online booking form to request how the engine works? a ticket. Allocations of tickets are set aside for LSE staff and students. Transcripts, podcasts and videos of an increasing number of LSE events are available online after the event at lse.ac.uk/lse-player.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arsenalisation of Space: the Imagined Community of a Football Club
    New Zealand Journal of Research on Europe Volume 9, Number 1, 2015 (June) THE ARSENALISATION OF SPACE: THE IMAGINED COMMUNITY OF A FOOTBALL CLUB William Sidnam Auckland, New Zealand Email: [email protected] New Zealand Journal of Research on Europe Volume 9, Number 1, 2015 (June) Abstract This article examines the relationship between the fan community of Arsenal Football Club and time-space distanciation. Since the end of European imperialism, the English football club has been quietly colonising the minds of spectators everywhere, introducing them to cultural forms that had once been unique to England. Now a global phenomenon, the North London club has an estimated 113 million fans worldwide. Using Benedict Anderson’s concept of “imagined community,” I analyse the conditions that have enabled fans from Lagos to Los Angeles, and from Beijing to Bangalore, to identify with a sporting institution based in a country they may have never visited. To explore the paradoxes of this long- distance relationship, this article analyses information about Arsenal that appeared in newspapers, blogs, and social media websites from 2004 to 2014. The study concludes that, with the advent of digital technologies, Arsenal is simultaneously embedded in English culture and accessible to the millions of fans living in the interminable spaces beyond its country’s borders. In an age marked by constant social and technological change, fans find in the football club a universal community capable of contributing to their sense of ontological security. Keywords: imagined community, identity, football fandom, Arsenal, time-space distanciation, mediated experience, liquid society, globalisation 135 New Zealand Journal of Research on Europe Volume 9, Number 1, 2015 (June) Introduction When Suleiman Omondi came home from the pub on 5th May 2009, he tied a rope around his neck and hanged himself.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills, Defence, Foreign Affairs, and International Development Committees
    House of Commons Business, Innovation and Skills, Defence, Foreign Affairs, and International Development Committees Scrutiny of Arms Export Controls (2011): UK Strategic Export Controls Annual Report 2009, Quarterly Reports for 2010, licensing policy and review of export control legislation First Joint Report of Session 2010–11 Fourth Report from the Business, Innovation and Skills Committee of Session 2010–11 Second Report from the Defence Committee of Session 2010–11 Fifth Report from the Foreign Affairs Committee of Session 2010–11 Sixth Report from the International Development Committee of Session 2010–11 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 22 March 2011 HC 686 Published on 5 April 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £17.50 The Committees on Arms Export Controls The Business Innovation and Skills, Defence, Foreign Affairs and International Development Committees are appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, the Ministry of Defence, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the Department for International Development and any associated public bodies. Current membership BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND SKILLS: Mr Adrian Bailey*§, Mr Brian Binley, Paul Blomfield*, Katy Clark*, Rebecca Harris, Margot James*, Dan Jarvis, Simon Kirby, Ian Murray*, Mr David Ward, Nadhim Zahawi* DEFENCE: Rt Hon James Arbuthnot*§, Mr Julian
    [Show full text]
  • PMC ANNUAL REPORT 2010 2011 “We’Re Trying to Get the Message Across to Stop Violence Against Women
    POPULATION MEDIA CENTER PMC ANNUAL REPORT 2010 2011 “We’re trying to get the message across to stop violence against women... it’s not the end, we still have hope.” The actress playing Nini in PMC’s Papua New Guinea drama, Echoes of Change Population Media Center P.O. Box 547 Shelburne, VT 05482 USA T + 1.802.985.8156 F + 1.802.985.8119 [email protected] POPULATIONMEDIA.ORG Cover photo taken in Vietnam by Ly Hoang Long. CONTENTS 02 INTRODUCTION 04 MISSION AND MAP OF PMC’S WORK 08 YEAR IN REVIEW 10 BURKINA FASO 12 ETHIOPIA 16 NIGERIA 17 SENEGAL 18 SIERRA LEONE 19 SOUTH AFRICA 20 PAPUA NEW GUINEA 24 VIETNAM 26 BRAZIL 27 CARIBBEAN 28 MEXICO 30 UNITED STATES 36 WORLDWIDE 38 FINANCIAL STATEMENT 40 DONORS 46 BOARD OF DIRECTORS 47 PROGRAM ADVISORY BOARD 56 WORLDWIDE STAFF William N. Ryerson INTRODUCTION Founder and President, Population Media Center Since the population factor is a major driver of demand October 31, 2011 marked the day human for food, and since so many women choose not to use contraception as a result of desired large family size, population reached 7 billion. misinformation about the relative safety of contraception compared to early and repeated childbearing, disapproval The first Homo sapiens were recorded in 200,000 BC. of contraception by their partners, or lack of self-efficacy By these calculations, it took 201,804 years for human (the belief that one has the right and the ability to determine population to reach 1 billion. But in the last 50 years alone, the number and spacing of children), PMC has a unique we added 4 billion people to the planet – a number most of ability to contribute to helping people make healthy and us can’t even visualize.
    [Show full text]