Evolutionary Conserved Regulatory Mechanisms of the JAK/STAT Pathway

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evolutionary Conserved Regulatory Mechanisms of the JAK/STAT Pathway JUHA GRÖNHOLM Evolutionary Conserved Regulatory Mechanisms of the JAK/STAT Pathway ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be presented, with the permission of the board of Institute of Biomedical Technology of the University of Tampere, for public discussion in the Jarmo Visakorpi Auditorium, of the Arvo Building, Lääkärinkatu 1, Tampere, on November 2nd, 2012, at 12 o’clock. UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE ACADEMIC DISSERTATION University of Tampere, Institute of Biomedical Technology and BioMediTech, Tampere University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Finland Supervised by Reviewed by Professor Olli Silvennoinen Professor Jean-Luc Imler University of Tampere University of Strasbourg Finland France Professor Mika Rämet Docent Sampsa Matikainen University of Tampere University of Helsinki Finland Finland Copyright ©2012 Tampere University Press and the author Distribution Tel. +358 40 190 9800 Bookshop TAJU [email protected] P.O. Box 617 www.uta.fi/taju 33014 University of Tampere http://granum.uta.fi Finland Cover design by Mikko Reinikka Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 1775 Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis 1249 ISBN 978-951-44-8948-8 (print) ISBN 978-951-44-8949-5 (pdf) ISSN-L 1455-1616 ISSN 1456-954X ISSN 1455-1616 http://acta.uta.fi Tampereen Yliopistopaino Oy – Juvenes Print Tampere 2012 Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................. 3 List of original communications ......................................................................................... 6 Abbreviations...................................................................................................................... 7 Abstract............................................................................................................................. 10 Tiivistelmä ........................................................................................................................ 12 1. Introduction................................................................................................................... 14 2. Review of the literature................................................................................................. 16 2.1 Cytokines and the immune system ......................................................................... 16 2.2 The JAK/STAT pathway ........................................................................................ 18 2.2.1 Biological roles of the JAK/STAT pathway.................................................... 19 2.2.2 Domain structure of JAKs ............................................................................... 20 2.2.3 Domain structure of STATs............................................................................. 21 2.3 Regulation of the JAK/STAT pathway................................................................... 23 2.3.1 Protein tyrosine phosphatases.......................................................................... 23 2.3.2 Suppressors of cytokine signaling, SOCS ....................................................... 25 2.3.3 Protein inhibitors of activated STAT, PIAS .................................................... 26 2.3.4 Post-translational modifications in the regulation of the JAK/STAT pathway........................................................................................................... 29 2.3.4.1 Tyrosine and serine phosphorylation, methylation, acetylation, O-glycosylation and ISGylation ............................................................... 29 2.3.4.2 Ubiquitination ........................................................................................... 31 2.4 Sumoylation ............................................................................................................ 32 2.4.1 Physiological consequences of protein sumoylation ....................................... 36 2.4.2 Sumoylation of STATs .................................................................................... 38 2.5 Drosophila as a model organism in biomedical research ....................................... 40 2.6 Overview of the Drosophila immune system ......................................................... 41 2.6.1 Cellular response.............................................................................................. 41 2.6.2 Humoral response ............................................................................................ 44 3 2.7 The Drosophila JAK/STAT pathway..................................................................... 46 2.7.1 Roles of the JAK/STAT pathway in Drosophila development and the immune response ............................................................................................ 48 2.7.2 Regulation of the Drosophila JAK/STAT pathway ........................................ 51 3. Aims of the study.......................................................................................................... 54 4. Materials and methods .................................................................................................. 55 4.1. Plasmid constructs and cloning.............................................................................. 55 4.2 Antibodies............................................................................................................... 57 4.3 Cell culture.............................................................................................................. 57 4.4 Generation of stable overexpression S2 cell lines .................................................. 58 4.5 Transfections........................................................................................................... 58 4.6 Immunoprecipitation, Co-immunoprecipitation and Western blotting................... 59 4.6.1 Immunoprecipitation........................................................................................ 60 4.6.2 Co-immunoprecipitation.................................................................................. 60 4.6.3 Western blotting............................................................................................... 60 4.7 dsRNA synthesis and RNA interference................................................................. 61 4.8 Luciferase reporter gene assay................................................................................ 62 4.9 RNAi screen to identify novel JAK/STAT pathway regulators ............................. 62 4.10 Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)....................................................... 64 5. Results........................................................................................................................... 65 5.1 Sumoylation of Stat92E (Article I)......................................................................... 65 5.1.1 Lysine 187 is a putative sumoylation site in Stat92E ...................................... 65 5.1.2 Stat92E is sumoylated in mammalian cells ..................................................... 66 5.1.3 Stat92E is sumoylated in Drosophila S2 cells and lysine 187 is the acceptor site for SUMO conjugation .............................................................. 67 5.1.4 Sumoylation negatively regulates Stat92E driven gene expression ................ 67 5.2 CG14225/ET and CG31716/Not4 as regulators of the Drosophila JAK/STAT pathway (Articles II and III) ................................................................................. 68 5.2.1 CG14225 and CG31716 are novel Drosophila JAK/STAT pathway regulators found in a genome-wide RNAi screen in Drosophila S2 cells....................... 68 4 5.2.2 CG14225 encodes a gp130 related transmembrane protein called Eye transformer (ET) (Article II)........................................................................... 71 5.2.3 ET negatively regulates Upd-induced Stat92E phosphorylation (Article II)... 72 5.2.4 CG31716 overexpression enhances JAK/STAT pathway mediated gene responses in S2 cells (Article III).................................................................... 73 5.2.5 Drosophila CG31716 gene encodes Not4, a protein related to mammalian CNOT4 (Article III)........................................................................................ 74 5.2.6 Human CNOT4 regulates STAT1- and STAT6-mediated signal transduction (Article III)...................................................................................................... 74 5.2.7 Drosophila Not4 is a Stat92E interacting protein (Article III)........................ 75 5.2.8 Not4/CNOT4 does not affect STAT tyrosine phosphorylation (Article III) ... 75 5.2.9 Not4 is required for efficient Stat92E DNA binding (Article III) ................... 77 6. Discussion..................................................................................................................... 78 6.1 Drosophila melanogaster as a model for studying the JAK/STAT signaling cascade .................................................................................................................. 78 6.2 Sumoylation in the regulation of transcription factor activity................................ 80 6.3 SUMO as a regulator of STAT-mediated gene expression .................................... 81 6.4 Genome-wide screens to identify genes that regulate the activity of the JAK/STAT pathway.............................................................................................. 83 7. Conclusions..................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • CNOT4 Antibody (Pab)
    21.10.2014CNOT4 antibody (pAb) Rabbit Anti-Human/Mouse/Rat CCR4-NOT Transcription Complex Subunit 4 (NOT4, NOT4H) Instruction Manual Catalog Number PK-AB718-4813 Synonyms CNOT4 Antibody: CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 4, NOT4, NOT4H Description CNOT4 is a component of the CCR4-NOT transcription complex, a complex that is implicated in the repression of RNA polymerase II transcription. In the CCR4-NOT complex, CNOT4 acts as an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase and interacts with a subset of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes through a unique C4C4 RING domain. This E3 ligase activity was shown to be dependent on the selective and specific interaction with the ubiquitin conjugating enzyme UbcH5B. In yeast, mutations in CNOT4 that prevented its interaction with the UbcH5B homolog UBC4 caused increased sensitivity to hydroxyurea, heat shock, and hygromycin B, suggesting that CNOT4 and UbcH5B are involved in stress response in vivo. Multiple isoforms of CNOT4 are known to exist. Quantity 100 µg Source / Host Rabbit Immunogen CNOT4 antibody was raised against a 19 amino acid peptide near the amino terminus of the human CNOT4. Purification Method Affinity chromatography purified via peptide column. Clone / IgG Subtype Polyclonal antibody Species Reactivity Human, Mouse, Rat Specificity Formulation Antibody is supplied in PBS containing 0.02% sodium azide. Reconstitution During shipment, small volumes of antibody will occasionally become entrapped in the seal of the product vial. For products with volumes of 200 μl or less, we recommend gently tapping the vial on a hard surface or briefly centrifuging the vial in a tabletop centrifuge to dislodge any liquid in the container’s cap.
    [Show full text]
  • Role and Regulation of the P53-Homolog P73 in the Transformation of Normal Human Fibroblasts
    Role and regulation of the p53-homolog p73 in the transformation of normal human fibroblasts Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Lars Hofmann aus Aschaffenburg Würzburg 2007 Eingereicht am Mitglieder der Promotionskommission: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Dr. Martin J. Müller Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael P. Schön Gutachter : Prof. Dr. Georg Krohne Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am Erklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbständig angefertigt und keine anderen als die angegebenen Hilfsmittel und Quellen verwendet habe. Diese Arbeit wurde weder in gleicher noch in ähnlicher Form in einem anderen Prüfungsverfahren vorgelegt. Ich habe früher, außer den mit dem Zulassungsgesuch urkundlichen Graden, keine weiteren akademischen Grade erworben und zu erwerben gesucht. Würzburg, Lars Hofmann Content SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ IV ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ............................................................................................. V 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Molecular basics of cancer .......................................................................................... 1 1.2. Early research on tumorigenesis ................................................................................. 3 1.3. Developing
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Model of the Ubch5b/CNOT4 Complex Revealed by Combining NMR, Mutagenesis, and Docking Approaches
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Structure, Vol. 12, 633–644, April, 2004, 2004 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. DOI 10.1016/j.str.2004.03.004 Structural Model of the UbcH5B/CNOT4 Complex Revealed by Combining NMR, Mutagenesis, and Docking Approaches Cyril Dominguez,1 Alexandre M.J.J. Bonvin,1 Weissman, 2001). Different classes of E3 ligases have G. Sebastiaan Winkler,2 Frederik M.A. van Schaik,2 been found that mediate substrate ubiquitination. E3 H.Th. Marc Timmers,2 and Rolf Boelens1,* enzymes can be distinguished by their E2-interacting 1Department of NMR Spectroscopy domains, which include the HECT and the RING domains Bijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research (Glickman and Ciechanover, 2002; Pickart, 2001). There- Utrecht University fore, specific E2/E3 pairs are thought to be responsible Padualaan 8 for mediating target recognition and subsequent ubiqui- 3584 Utrect tination. Structures of nine E2 enzymes from different 2 Department of Physiological Chemistry species in the free form have been solved by X-ray University Medical Center Utrecht crystallography (Cook et al., 1992, 1993, 1997; Hamilton Universiteitsweg 100 et al., 2001; Jiang and Basavappa, 1999; Lin et al., 2002; 3584 CG Utrecht Tong et al., 1997; VanDemark et al., 2001; Worthylake The Netherlands et al., 1998) and one was solved by NMR (Miura et al., 2002). The structure of the human E2 enzyme UbcH5B, however, has not been determined. Furthermore, five Summary structures of E2 in complex with various other proteins have been solved by X-ray crystallography (Bernier-Vil- The protein CNOT4 possesses an N-terminal RING lamor et al., 2002; Huang et al., 1999; Moraes et al., finger domain that acts as an E3 ubiquitin ligase and 2001; VanDemark et al., 2001; Zheng et al., 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of CNOT8 Deadenylase Subunit in DNA Damage Responses Following Ionizing Radiation (IR)
    Reports of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology Vol.9, No.1, July 2020 Original article www.RBMB.net Importance of CNOT8 Deadenylase Subunit in DNA Damage Responses Following Ionizing Radiation (IR) Samira Eskandarian1,2, Roger Grand2, Shiva Irani*1, Mohsen Saeedi3, Reza Mirfakhraie4 Abstract Background: The Ccr4-Not protein complex (CNOT complex) is a key regulator of gene expression in eukaryotic cells. Ccr4-Not Complex is composed of at least nine conserved subunits in mammalian cells with two main enzymatic activities. CNOT8 is a subunit of the complex with deadenylase activity that interacts transiently with the CNOT6 or CNOT6L subunits. Here, we focused on the role of the human CNOT8 subunit in the DNA damage response (DDR). Methods: Cell viability was assessed to measure ATP level using a Cell Titer-Glo Luminescence reagent up to 4 days’ post CNOT8 siRNA transfection. In addition, expression level of phosphorylated proteins in signalling pathways were detected by western blotting and immunofluorescence microscopy. CNOT8- depleted Hela cells post- 3 Gy ionizing radiation (IR) treatment were considered as a control. Results: Our results from cell viability assays indicated a significant reduction at 72-hour post CNOT8 siRNA transfection (p= 0.04). Western blot analysis showed slightly alteration in the phosphorylation of DNA damage response (DDR) proteins in CNOT8-depleted HeLa cells following treatment with ionizing radiation (IR). Increased foci formation of H2AX, RPA, 53BP1, and RAD51 foci was observed after IR in CNOT8-depleted cells compared to the control cells. Conclusions: We conclude that CNOT8 deadenylase subunit is involved in the cellular response to DNA damage. Keywords: CNOT complex, CNOT8, DNA damage response, SiRNA.
    [Show full text]
  • NRF1) Coordinates Changes in the Transcriptional and Chromatin Landscape Affecting Development and Progression of Invasive Breast Cancer
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 11-7-2018 Decipher Mechanisms by which Nuclear Respiratory Factor One (NRF1) Coordinates Changes in the Transcriptional and Chromatin Landscape Affecting Development and Progression of Invasive Breast Cancer Jairo Ramos [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Clinical Epidemiology Commons Recommended Citation Ramos, Jairo, "Decipher Mechanisms by which Nuclear Respiratory Factor One (NRF1) Coordinates Changes in the Transcriptional and Chromatin Landscape Affecting Development and Progression of Invasive Breast Cancer" (2018). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 3872. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/3872 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida DECIPHER MECHANISMS BY WHICH NUCLEAR RESPIRATORY FACTOR ONE (NRF1) COORDINATES CHANGES IN THE TRANSCRIPTIONAL AND CHROMATIN LANDSCAPE AFFECTING DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION OF INVASIVE BREAST CANCER A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in PUBLIC HEALTH by Jairo Ramos 2018 To: Dean Tomás R. Guilarte Robert Stempel College of Public Health and Social Work This dissertation, Written by Jairo Ramos, and entitled Decipher Mechanisms by Which Nuclear Respiratory Factor One (NRF1) Coordinates Changes in the Transcriptional and Chromatin Landscape Affecting Development and Progression of Invasive Breast Cancer, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative Analysis of Disease Signatures Shows Inflammation Disrupts Juvenile Experience-Dependent Cortical Plasticity
    New Research Development Integrative Analysis of Disease Signatures Shows Inflammation Disrupts Juvenile Experience- Dependent Cortical Plasticity Milo R. Smith1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, Poromendro Burman1,3,4,5,8, Masato Sadahiro1,3,4,5,6,8, Brian A. Kidd,2,7 Joel T. Dudley,2,7 and Hirofumi Morishita1,3,4,5,8 DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0240-16.2016 1Department of Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, 2Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, 3Department of Psychiatry, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, 4Department of Ophthalmology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, 5Mindich Child Health and Development Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, 6Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, 7Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029, and 8Friedman Brain Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York 10029 Visual Abstract Throughout childhood and adolescence, periods of heightened neuroplasticity are critical for the development of healthy brain function and behavior. Given the high prevalence of neurodevelopmental disorders, such as autism, identifying disruptors of developmental plasticity represents an essential step for developing strategies for prevention and intervention. Applying a novel computational approach that systematically assessed connections between 436 transcriptional signatures of disease and multiple signatures of neuroplasticity, we identified inflammation as a common pathological process central to a diverse set of diseases predicted to dysregulate Significance Statement During childhood and adolescence, heightened neuroplasticity allows the brain to reorganize and adapt to its environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Ubiquitination-Dependent Control of Sexual Differentiation in Fission Yeast
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Ubiquitination-dependent control of sexual differentiation in fission yeast Fabrizio Simonetti1,2, Tito Candelli1,2, Sebastien Leon3, Domenico Libri1, Mathieu Rougemaille1†* 1Institut Jacques Monod, Team “Metabolism and Function of RNA in the Nucleus”, CNRS, UMR7592, Universite´ Paris-Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite´, Paris, France; 2Universite´ Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; 3Institut Jacques Monod, Team “Membrane Trafficking, Ubiquitin and Signaling”, CNRS, UMR9198, Universite´ Paris- Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite´, Paris, France Abstract In fission yeast, meiosis-specific transcripts are selectively eliminated during vegetative growth by the combined action of the YTH-family RNA-binding protein Mmi1 and the nuclear exosome. Upon nutritional starvation, the master regulator of meiosis Mei2 inactivates Mmi1, thereby allowing expression of the meiotic program. Here, we show that the E3 ubiquitin ligase subunit Not4/Mot2 of the evolutionarily conserved Ccr4-Not complex, which associates with Mmi1, promotes suppression of meiotic transcripts expression in mitotic cells. Our analyses suggest that Mot2 directs ubiquitination of Mei2 to preserve the activity of Mmi1 during vegetative growth. Importantly, Mot2 is not involved in the constitutive pathway of Mei2 turnover, but rather plays a regulatory role to limit its accumulation or inhibit its function. We propose that Mmi1 recruits the *For correspondence: Ccr4-Not complex to counteract its own inhibitor Mei2, thereby locking the system in a stable state [email protected] that ensures the repression of the meiotic program by Mmi1. saclay.fr DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.28046.001 Present address: †Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), CEA, CNRS, Univ. Paris- Introduction Sud, Universite´Paris-Saclay, Gif- sur-Yvette, France The cell cycle switch from mitosis to meiosis is associated with profound changes in gene expression.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conserved RNA Recognition Motif and C3H1 Domain of the Not4
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The conserved RNA recognition motif and C3H1 domain of the Not4 ubiquitin ligase regulate in vivo Received: 17 November 2017 Accepted: 16 May 2018 ligase function Published: xx xx xxxx Hongfeng Chen1, Tirupataiah Sirupangi1, Zhao-Hui Wu1, Daniel L. Johnson2 & R. Nicholas Laribee1 The Ccr4-Not complex controls RNA polymerase II (Pol II) dependent gene expression and proteasome function. The Not4 ubiquitin ligase is a Ccr4-Not subunit that has both a RING domain and a conserved RNA recognition motif and C3H1 domain (referred to as the RRM-C domain) with unknown function. We demonstrate that while individual Not4 RING or RRM-C mutants fail to replicate the proteasomal defects found in Not4 defcient cells, mutation of both exhibits a Not4 loss of function phenotype. Transcriptome analysis revealed that the Not4 RRM-C afects a specifc subset of Pol II-regulated genes, including those involved in transcription elongation, cyclin-dependent kinase regulated nutrient responses, and ribosomal biogenesis. The Not4 RING, RRM-C, or RING/RRM-C mutations cause a generalized increase in Pol II binding at a subset of these genes, yet their impact on gene expression does not always correlate with Pol II recruitment which suggests Not4 regulates their expression through additional mechanisms. Intriguingly, we fnd that while the Not4 RRM-C is dispensable for Ccr4-Not association with RNA Pol II, the Not4 RING domain is required for these interactions. Collectively, these data elucidate previously unknown roles for the conserved Not4 RRM-C and RING domains in regulating Ccr4-Not dependent functions in vivo.
    [Show full text]
  • Reduced Expression of Innate Immunity-Related Genes in Lymph
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Reduced expression of innate immunity‑related genes in lymph node metastases of luminal breast cancer patients Marta Popeda1, Aleksandra Markiewicz1, Tomasz Stokowy2, Jolanta Szade3, Magdalena Niemira4, Adam Kretowski4, Natalia Bednarz‑Knoll1 & Anna J. Zaczek1* Immune system plays a dual role in cancer by either targeting or supporting neoplastic cells at various stages of disease, including metastasis. Yet, the exact immune‑related transcriptome profles of primary tumours (PT) and lymph node metastases (LNM) and their evolution during luminal breast cancer (BCa) dissemination remain undiscovered. In order to identify the immune‑related transcriptome changes that accompany lymphatic spread, we analysed PT‑LNM pairs of luminal BCa using NanoString technology. Decrease in complement C3—one of the top‑downregulated genes, in LNM was validated at the protein level using immunohistochemistry. Thirty‑three of 360 analysed genes were downregulated (9%), whereas only 3 (0.8%) upregulated in LNM when compared to the corresponding PT. In LNM, reduced expression was observed in genes related to innate immunity, particularly to the complement system (C1QB, C1S, C1R, C4B, CFB, C3, SERPING1 and C3AR1). In validation cohort, complement C3 protein was less frequently expressed in LNM than in PT and it was associated with worse prognosis. To conclude, local expression of the complement system components declines during lymphatic spread of non‑metastatic luminal BCa, whilst further reduction of tumoral complement C3 in LNM is indicative for poor survival. This points to context‑dependent role of complement C3 in BCa dissemination. Te metastatic disease remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Metastasis is a multistep process that involves the action of both tumour microenvironment (TME), comprising immune cells and stromal compo- nents, and cancer cells.
    [Show full text]
  • CNOT4 Monoclonal Antibody Catalog Number:67798-1-Ig
    For Research Use Only CNOT4 Monoclonal antibody Catalog Number:67798-1-Ig www.ptglab.com Catalog Number: GenBank Accession Number: Purification Method: Basic Information 67798-1-Ig BC035590 Protein A purification Size: GeneID (NCBI): CloneNo.: 150ul , Concentration: 1000 μg/ml by 4850 4H5H3 Nanodrop; Full Name: Recommended Dilutions: Source: CCR4-NOT transcription complex, WB 1:2000-1:10000 Mouse subunit 4 IHC 1:250-1:1000 Isotype: Calculated MW: IF 1:200-1:800 IgG2b 575 aa, 64 kDa Immunogen Catalog Number: Observed MW: AG29964 64-85 kDa Applications Tested Applications: Positive Controls: IF, IHC, WB, ELISA WB : HeLa cells, HSC-T6 cells, MCF-7 cells, U2OS cells Species Specificity: IHC : human colon cancer tissue, Human, mouse, rat Note-IHC: suggested antigen retrieval with IF : human colon cancer tissue, TE buffer pH 9.0; (*) Alternatively, antigen retrieval may be performed with citrate buffer pH 6.0 CNOT4, also known as CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 4 , has E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, and promotes Background Information ubiquitination and degradation of target proteins. CNOT4 is involved in activation of the JAK/STAT pathway. CNOT4 exist many isoforms and the range of its molecular weight from 48 to 84 kDa. Storage: Storage Store at -20°C. Storage Buffer: PBS with 0.02% sodium azide and 50% glycerol pH 7.3. Aliquoting is unnecessary for -20ºC storage For technical support and original validation data for this product please contact: This product is exclusively available under Proteintech T: 1 (888) 4PTGLAB (1-888-478-4522) (toll free E: [email protected] Group brand and is not available to purchase from any in USA), or 1(312) 455-8498 (outside USA) W: ptglab.com other manufacturer.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Talk Between PRMT1-Mediated Methylation and Ubiquitylation on RBM15 Controls RNA Splicing
    1 Cross-talk between PRMT1-mediated methylation and ubiquitylation on RBM15 controls RNA splicing 2 Li Zhang1*, Ngoc-Tung Tran1*, Hairui Su1*, Rui Wang2, Yuheng Lu11, Haiping Tang4, Sayura Aoyagi10, 3 Ailan Guo10, Alireza Khodadadi-Jamayran1, Dewang Zhou1, Kun Qian5, Todd Hricik3, Jocelyn Côté6, 4 Xiaosi Han8, Wenping Zhou7, Suparna Laha9, Omar Abdel-Wahab3, Ross L. Levine3, Glen Raffel9, 5 Yanyan Liu7, Dongquan Chen12, Haitao Li4, Tim Townes1, Hengbin Wang1, Haiteng Deng4, Y. George 6 Zheng5, Christina Leslie11, Minkui Luo2, and Xinyang Zhao1 7 8 1. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, UAB Stem Cell Institute, The University of 9 Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. 10 2. Program of Molecular Pharmacology, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY 10021, USA. 11 3. HOPP, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY 10021, USA. 12 4. School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084 China. 13 5. Department of Pharmaceutical & Biomedical Sciences, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA 14 30602, USA 15 6. Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, 16 ON K1H 8M5, Canada. 17 7. Department of Internal Medicine, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan 18 Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China 19 8. Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Alabama at 20 Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. 21 9. Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 364 22 Plantation St, Worcester, MA 01605, USA. 23 10. Cell Signaling Inc. 3 Trask lane, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. 24 11. Computational Biology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY 10021, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cnot Complex Contributes to the Maintenance of Genome Stability
    THE CNOT COMPLEX CONTRIBUTES TO THE MAINTENANCE OF GENOME STABILITY By NAFISEH CHALABI HAGKARIM A thesis presented to the College of Medical and Dental Sciences, the University of Birmingham, for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham December 2019 1 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The yeast CCR4-NOT (CNOT in mammals) complex is a large (1.0-MDa) and highly conserved multifunctional set of proteins. It is involved in many different aspects of mRNA metabolism, including repression and activation of mRNA initiation, control of mRNA elongation, and deadenylation-dependent mRNA turnover; it also has a role in ubiquitin-protein transferase activity and histone methylation. Some studies have suggested that the yeast complex may be involved in the recognition and repair of DNA damage. To investigate whether similar properties are attributable to the mammalian complex we have examined the effects of inactivation of the complex on various aspects of the DNA damage response. Inactivation was achieved by depletion of CNOT1, the largest of the CNOT proteins, which forms a scaffold to the complex.
    [Show full text]