The Genetic Determinants of the Relative Expression of Alternative 3’UTR Isoforms in Human
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Novel Approach to Identify Driver Genes Involved in Androgen-Independent Prostate Cancer
Schinke et al. Molecular Cancer 2014, 13:120 http://www.molecular-cancer.com/content/13/1/120 RESEARCH Open Access A novel approach to identify driver genes involved in androgen-independent prostate cancer Ellyn N Schinke1, Victor Bii1, Arun Nalla1, Dustin T Rae1, Laura Tedrick1, Gary G Meadows1 and Grant D Trobridge1,2* Abstract Background: Insertional mutagenesis screens have been used with great success to identify oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Typically, these screens use gammaretroviruses (γRV) or transposons as insertional mutagens. However, insertional mutations from replication-competent γRVs or transposons that occur later during oncogenesis can produce passenger mutations that do not drive cancer progression. Here, we utilized a replication-incompetent lentiviral vector (LV) to perform an insertional mutagenesis screen to identify genes in the progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Methods: Prostate cancer cells were mutagenized with a LV to enrich for clones with a selective advantage in an androgen-deficient environment provided by a dysregulated gene(s) near the vector integration site. We performed our screen using an in vitro AIPC model and also an in vivo xenotransplant model for AIPC. Our approach identified proviral integration sites utilizing a shuttle vector that allows for rapid rescue of plasmids in E. coli that contain LV long terminal repeat (LTR)-chromosome junctions. This shuttle vector approach does not require PCR amplification and has several advantages over PCR-based techniques. Results: Proviral integrations were enriched near prostate cancer susceptibility loci in cells grown in androgen- deficient medium (p < 0.001), and five candidate genes that influence AIPC were identified; ATPAF1, GCOM1, MEX3D, PTRF, and TRPM4. -
Whole-Genome Microarray Detects Deletions and Loss of Heterozygosity of Chromosome 3 Occurring Exclusively in Metastasizing Uveal Melanoma
Anatomy and Pathology Whole-Genome Microarray Detects Deletions and Loss of Heterozygosity of Chromosome 3 Occurring Exclusively in Metastasizing Uveal Melanoma Sarah L. Lake,1 Sarah E. Coupland,1 Azzam F. G. Taktak,2 and Bertil E. Damato3 PURPOSE. To detect deletions and loss of heterozygosity of disease is fatal in 92% of patients within 2 years of diagnosis. chromosome 3 in a rare subset of fatal, disomy 3 uveal mela- Clinical and histopathologic risk factors for UM metastasis noma (UM), undetectable by fluorescence in situ hybridization include large basal tumor diameter (LBD), ciliary body involve- (FISH). ment, epithelioid cytomorphology, extracellular matrix peri- ϩ ETHODS odic acid-Schiff-positive (PAS ) loops, and high mitotic M . Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification 3,4 5 (MLPA) with the P027 UM assay was performed on formalin- count. Prescher et al. showed that a nonrandom genetic fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) whole tumor sections from 19 change, monosomy 3, correlates strongly with metastatic death, and the correlation has since been confirmed by several disomy 3 metastasizing UMs. Whole-genome microarray analy- 3,6–10 ses using a single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray (aSNP) groups. Consequently, fluorescence in situ hybridization were performed on frozen tissue samples from four fatal dis- (FISH) detection of chromosome 3 using a centromeric probe omy 3 metastasizing UMs and three disomy 3 tumors with Ͼ5 became routine practice for UM prognostication; however, 5% years’ metastasis-free survival. to 20% of disomy 3 UM patients unexpectedly develop metas- tases.11 Attempts have therefore been made to identify the RESULTS. Two metastasizing UMs that had been classified as minimal region(s) of deletion on chromosome 3.12–15 Despite disomy 3 by FISH analysis of a small tumor sample were found these studies, little progress has been made in defining the key on MLPA analysis to show monosomy 3. -
Genetic Basis of Simple and Complex Traits with Relevance to Avian Evolution
Genetic basis of simple and complex traits with relevance to avian evolution Małgorzata Anna Gazda Doctoral Program in Biodiversity, Genetics and Evolution D Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade do Porto 2019 Supervisor Miguel Jorge Pinto Carneiro, Auxiliary Researcher, CIBIO/InBIO, Laboratório Associado, Universidade do Porto Co-supervisor Ricardo Lopes, CIBIO/InBIO Leif Andersson, Uppsala University FCUP Genetic basis of avian traits Nota Previa Na elaboração desta tese, e nos termos do número 2 do Artigo 4º do Regulamento Geral dos Terceiros Ciclos de Estudos da Universidade do Porto e do Artigo 31º do D.L.74/2006, de 24 de Março, com a nova redação introduzida pelo D.L. 230/2009, de 14 de Setembro, foi efetuado o aproveitamento total de um conjunto coerente de trabalhos de investigação já publicados ou submetidos para publicação em revistas internacionais indexadas e com arbitragem científica, os quais integram alguns dos capítulos da presente tese. Tendo em conta que os referidos trabalhos foram realizados com a colaboração de outros autores, o candidato esclarece que, em todos eles, participou ativamente na sua conceção, na obtenção, análise e discussão de resultados, bem como na elaboração da sua forma publicada. Este trabalho foi apoiado pela Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) através da atribuição de uma bolsa de doutoramento (PD/BD/114042/2015) no âmbito do programa doutoral em Biodiversidade, Genética e Evolução (BIODIV). 2 FCUP Genetic basis of avian traits Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank to my all supervisors Miguel Carneiro, Ricardo Lopes and Leif Andersson, for the demanding task of supervising myself last four years. -
A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated. -
Structural Basis for DEAH-Helicase Activation by G-Patch Proteins
Structural basis for DEAH-helicase activation by G-patch proteins Michael K. Studera, Lazar Ivanovica, Marco E. Webera, Sabrina Martia, and Stefanie Jonasa,1 aInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biophysics, Department of Biology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland Edited by Joseph D. Puglisi, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, and approved February 21, 2020 (received for review August 12, 2019) RNA helicases of the DEAH/RHA family are involved in many essential RNA bases are stacked in the RNA binding channel between a long cellular processes, such as splicing or ribosome biogenesis, where β-hairpin in RecA2 (β14 to β15 in hsDHX15/scPrp43; SI Appendix, they remodel large RNA–protein complexes to facilitate transitions Fig. S1) and a conserved loop in RecA1 (termed “Hook-turn”). to the next intermediate. DEAH helicases couple adenosine tri- This means that during progression into the open state, the phosphate (ATP) hydrolysis to conformational changes of their β-hairpin and two other RNA-binding patches in RecA2 (termed catalytic core. This movement results in translocation along RNA, “Hook-loop” and “motif V”; SI Appendix, Fig. S1) have to shift 1 which is held in place by auxiliary C-terminal domains. The activity nucleotide (nt) toward the 5′ end of the RNA. Thus, when the of DEAH proteins is strongly enhanced by the large and diverse RecA domains close back up, at the start of the next hydrolysis class of G-patch activators. Despite their central roles in RNA me- cycle, the RNA is pushed by 1 nt through the RNA channel. -
RBM5/LUCA-15 Tumour Suppression by Control of Apoptosis and the Cell
Review Article TheScientificWorldJOURNAL (2002) 2, 1885–1890 ISSN 1537-744X; DOI 10.1100/tsw.2002.859 RBM5/LUCA-15 —Tumour Suppression by Control of Apoptosis and the Cell Cycle? Mirna Mourtada-Maarabouni1 and Gwyn T. Williams2 School of Life Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffs, ST5 5BG, U.K. 1 2 TEL: 44 1782 583679, FAX 44 1782 583516; TEL: 44 1782 583032, FAX: 44 1782 583516 E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Received March 19, 2002; Revised May 17, 2002; Accepted May 17, 2002; Published July 4, 2002 The candidate tumour suppressor gene, LUCA-15, maps to the lung cancer tumour suppressor locus 3p21.3. The LUCA-15 gene locus encodes at least four alternatively spliced transcripts, which have been shown to function as regulators of apoptosis, a fact that may have a major significance in tumour regulation. This review highlights evidence that implicates the LUCA-15 locus in the control of apoptosis and cell proliferation, and reports observations that significantly strengthen the case for tumour suppressor activity by this gene. KEY WORDS: T-lymphocytes, LUCA-15, RNA-binding proteins, cell death, cell proliferation DOMAINS: cell death, cell cycle, oncology, gene regulation INTRODUCTION The molecular control of cancer is complex. Cancer genes are involved in the dysregulation of a whole range of normal cellular systemic processes including cell proliferation[1], cell-cell communication[2], DNA repair[3], chromosome stability[4], tumour invasion, motility and metastasis[5,6], apoptosis[7], and others. Despite impressive progress in recent years in understanding the molecular basis of cancer, many crucial genes remain to be identified. -
Westminsterresearch ZFP36 Proteins and Mrna Targets in B Cell
WestminsterResearch http://www.westminster.ac.uk/westminsterresearch ZFP36 proteins and mRNA targets in B cell malignancies Alcaraz, A. This is an electronic version of a PhD thesis awarded by the University of Westminster. © Miss Amor Alcaraz, 2015. The WestminsterResearch online digital archive at the University of Westminster aims to make the research output of the University available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the authors and/or copyright owners. Whilst further distribution of specific materials from within this archive is forbidden, you may freely distribute the URL of WestminsterResearch: ((http://westminsterresearch.wmin.ac.uk/). In case of abuse or copyright appearing without permission e-mail [email protected] ZFP36 proteins and mRNA targets in B cell malignancies Maria del Amor Alcaraz-Serrano A Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the University of Westminster for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2015 Abstract The ZFP36 proteins are a family of post-transcriptional regulator proteins that bind to adenine uridine rich elements (AREs) in 3’ untranslated (3’UTR) regions of mRNAs. The members of the human family, ZFP36L1, ZFP36L2 and ZFP36 are able to degrade mRNAs of important cell regulators that include cytokines, cell signalling proteins and transcriptional factors. This project investigated two proposed targets for the protein family that have important roles in B cell biology, BCL2 and CD38 mRNAs. BCL2 is an anti-apoptotic protein with key roles in cell survival and carcinogenesis; CD38 is a membrane protein differentially expressed in B cells and with a prognostic value in B chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL), patients positive for CD38 are considered to have a poor prognosis. -
Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase -
CNOT4 Antibody (Pab)
21.10.2014CNOT4 antibody (pAb) Rabbit Anti-Human/Mouse/Rat CCR4-NOT Transcription Complex Subunit 4 (NOT4, NOT4H) Instruction Manual Catalog Number PK-AB718-4813 Synonyms CNOT4 Antibody: CCR4-NOT transcription complex subunit 4, NOT4, NOT4H Description CNOT4 is a component of the CCR4-NOT transcription complex, a complex that is implicated in the repression of RNA polymerase II transcription. In the CCR4-NOT complex, CNOT4 acts as an E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase and interacts with a subset of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes through a unique C4C4 RING domain. This E3 ligase activity was shown to be dependent on the selective and specific interaction with the ubiquitin conjugating enzyme UbcH5B. In yeast, mutations in CNOT4 that prevented its interaction with the UbcH5B homolog UBC4 caused increased sensitivity to hydroxyurea, heat shock, and hygromycin B, suggesting that CNOT4 and UbcH5B are involved in stress response in vivo. Multiple isoforms of CNOT4 are known to exist. Quantity 100 µg Source / Host Rabbit Immunogen CNOT4 antibody was raised against a 19 amino acid peptide near the amino terminus of the human CNOT4. Purification Method Affinity chromatography purified via peptide column. Clone / IgG Subtype Polyclonal antibody Species Reactivity Human, Mouse, Rat Specificity Formulation Antibody is supplied in PBS containing 0.02% sodium azide. Reconstitution During shipment, small volumes of antibody will occasionally become entrapped in the seal of the product vial. For products with volumes of 200 μl or less, we recommend gently tapping the vial on a hard surface or briefly centrifuging the vial in a tabletop centrifuge to dislodge any liquid in the container’s cap. -
Supplemental Information Figure S1. Genome-Wide Alternative Splicing
Supplemental information Figure S1. Genome-wide alternative splicing events affected by inducible expression SRSF3 in mouse MEF3T3 cells. To examine the effects of SRSF3 (SRp20) on genome-wide RNA splicing in mouse cells, we utilized Exonhit SpliceArray to compare genome-wide changes of RNA splicing and transcription in MEF3T3 mouse fibroblasts with or without ectopically inducible expression of SRp20. (A–C) Clustered heat maps for the top events regulated by SRSF3 identified by ExonHit splice arrays. SRSF3-targeted genes in three experimental repeats consist of 65 evidenced splicing events (A), 74 novel splicing events (B) and 11 genes with expression changes (C), with a threshold of ≥2-fold changes (p<0.01) in log2 as determined by a B/E method and FDR cutoff of 0.1 for gene expression change and 0.2 for splicing alternation. Individual gene names and event ID are indicated on the right. Event ID specifies individual splicing events being detailed in Supplementary Table S1-S3. MEF3T3 cells with an empty vector transfection were included as vector controls. Color key scales in log2 values are indicated at the bottom of each panel. The full list of B/E ratio analysis result is available at NCBI GEO (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) (accession number GSE60147). Figure S2. Isoform profiling of mouse Ilf3 and human ILF3. (A) Diagrams of RNA isoforms of mouse Ilf3. Mouse Ilf3 consists of 22 exons and 21 introns, which produces 6 spliced isoforms of mRNAs by alternative splicing as illustrated. (B) Diagrams of splice isoforms of human ILF3. Human ILF3 gene consists of 21 exons (boxes) and 20 introns (lines between boxes), which produce 8 splice isoforms of mRNAs by alternative splicing as depicted. -
Genomic Signatures of Recent Adaptive Divergence in the Swamp Sparrow (Melospiza Georgiana)
GENOMIC SIGNATURES OF RECENT ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE IN THE SWAMP SPARROW (MELOSPIZA GEORGIANA) A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Petra Elizabeth Deane December 2017 © 2017 Petra Elizabeth Deane GENOMIC SIGNATURES OF RECENT ADAPTIVE DIVERGENCE IN THE SWAMP SPARROW (MELOSPIZA GEORGIANA) Petra Elizabeth Deane, Ph. D. Cornell University 2017 Populations that have recently diverged across sharp environmental gradients provide an opportunity to study the mechanisms by which natural selection drives adaptive divergence. Inland and coastal populations of the North American swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana) have become an emerging model system for studies of natural selection because they are morphologically and behaviorally distinct despite a very recent divergence time (<15,000 years), yet common garden experiments have demonstrated a genetic basis for their differences. I characterized genomic patterns of variation within and between inland and coastal swamp sparrows via reduced representation sequencing and demonstrated that background genomic differentiation (FST=0.02) and divergence (ΦST=0.05) between these populations is very low, rendering signatures of natural selection highly detectable (max FST=0.8). I then sequenced and assembled a de novo reference genome for the species and conducted a scan for genes involved in coastal adaptation, particularly the evolution of a deeper bill, darker plumage, and tolerance for salinity. I recovered a multigenic snapshot of adaptation via robust signatures of selection at 31 genes. As in Darwin’s finches, bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling appears responsible for changes in bill depth, a putative magic trait for ecological speciation. -
Role and Regulation of the P53-Homolog P73 in the Transformation of Normal Human Fibroblasts
Role and regulation of the p53-homolog p73 in the transformation of normal human fibroblasts Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg vorgelegt von Lars Hofmann aus Aschaffenburg Würzburg 2007 Eingereicht am Mitglieder der Promotionskommission: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Dr. Martin J. Müller Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael P. Schön Gutachter : Prof. Dr. Georg Krohne Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: Doktorurkunde ausgehändigt am Erklärung Hiermit erkläre ich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbständig angefertigt und keine anderen als die angegebenen Hilfsmittel und Quellen verwendet habe. Diese Arbeit wurde weder in gleicher noch in ähnlicher Form in einem anderen Prüfungsverfahren vorgelegt. Ich habe früher, außer den mit dem Zulassungsgesuch urkundlichen Graden, keine weiteren akademischen Grade erworben und zu erwerben gesucht. Würzburg, Lars Hofmann Content SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ IV ZUSAMMENFASSUNG ............................................................................................. V 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Molecular basics of cancer .......................................................................................... 1 1.2. Early research on tumorigenesis ................................................................................. 3 1.3. Developing