DOCSLIB.ORG

Transport Interchanges HILLINGDON DESIGN and ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT TRANSPORT INTERCHANGES Introduction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

HILLINGDON DESIGN AND ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT Contents 01 02 INTRODUCTION 04 HILLINGDON OVERVIEW 08 DESIGN PRINCIPLES 30 GOOD PRACTICE EXAMPLES 32 APPENDIX RELEVANT PLANNING POLICIES AND OTHER DOCUMENTS 36 REFERENCES 37 GLOSSARY This Supplementary Planning Document has been produced jointly by London Borough of Hillingdon and Mouchel Parkman, West Hall, Parvis Road, West Byfleet, Surrey London Borough of Hillingdon Transport Interchanges HILLINGDON DESIGN AND ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT TRANSPORT INTERCHANGES Introduction 02 Sustainable urban growth must be based this guidance concentrates on how these around good public transport links to interchanges should be designed and reduce the need to use the car for local developed. trips and commuting; 1.2 At interchanges development should High quality transport nodes encourage create places that are well-used and walking to and use of these facilities; and which become places of enduring value. Development close to transport nodes They should also provide transport is efficient and equitable and provides choice and provide the basis for good a mix of choices in land use and quality places to live and work. This accessibility. requires consideration of design principles that co-ordinate transport and And a holistic view to improving development together. Hillingdon’s environmental quality of life by Better walking ensuring levels of pollutants are minimised 1.3 This document recognises the need for environments around wherever possible. sustainable growth in Hillingdon around interchanges benefit everyone both public transport interchanges and corridors through the development of Transport Development Areas (TDAs). It 1.1 Transport interchanges are extremely defines key design principles for TDAs important in facilitating travel without a car 1.0 This document sets out design principles and provides guidance on how to apply as by their very nature they are the places for transport interchanges within Hillingdon. these principles, both on private land and that can be reached most easily. This The principles support sustainable transport the wider public realm of the street. means they are suitable for the and development, recognising the part development of major employment, retail, Hillingdon plays as a network of towns, leisure and other facilities that people suburban centres and villages in outer need to reach from a wide area and so London. London Borough of Hillingdon Transport Interchanges HILLINGDON DESIGN AND ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT TRANSPORT INTERCHANGES Introduction 03 Purpose of the Document Policy Context National and London 1.4 This document has several uses: Sustainable patterns of development There are significant areas of designated To help form the basis of development enable better access to jobs, education land use and large areas of green space. control decisions on planning applications and other local services; The main housing type is low density, in the identified transport corridors and at Trip generating development should be interwar and owner-occupier. interchanges, and in deciding on the focused in town centres as these are the nature of public realm improvements in Rail transport is provided mainly by the main transport hubs; these areas; Metropolitan, Central and Piccadilly lines Mixed development is key to reducing the in the north of the Borough and by First Information for transport operators / need to travel and maximise opportunities Great Western services through Hayes providers and public transport agencies for using other modes; and, and Harlington and West Drayton. on transport access and development Heathrow is serviced by the Heathrow London to become a walking friendly city synergy in Hillingdon; and, Express, tube (Piccadilly line), bus and taxi by 2015. services. Information for the Greater London The main mode of transport in Hillingdon Key interchanges are identified at Authority, adjoining planning authorities, is the car and vehicle congestion is Uxbridge and Hayes and Harlington and statutory planning consultees and increasing. developers on how LB Hillingdon will at centres with stations. The Borough is mainly suburban with interpret the Mayor’s London Plan and Main transport corridors are identified with low public transport accessibility levels. Mayor’s Transport Strategy in respect of priority bus routes running along heavily transport interchanges. trafficked vehicular routes. London Borough of Hillingdon Transport Interchanges HILLINGDON DESIGN AND ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT TRANSPORT INTERCHANGES Hillingdon Overview 04 1.5 Transport policy is set nationally, 1.6 Hillingdon has grown from a set of vil- regionally and locally to encourage greater use lages which form the heart of the boroughs of sustainable transport modes of cycling, bus, district and local centres. Public transport tram, canals and rail. Central to all these policy linkages between the centres are often broken aspirations is the need to create a good and not exploited to their full potential. Orbital walking environment providing good places, public transport in Hillingdon and West both for access and for quality of life. Relevant London is poorly developed. planning policies supporting the principles in this document are set out in the Appendix 1.7 Hillingdon as a Borough is currently very (p.34-37). car-reliant and continues to have the highest Low density, suburban car ownership among London Boroughs. street in Hillingdon. Some There are several strategic roads that bring are not close to local facilities, necessitating traffic from the wider area to access trips by car. employment areas and Heathrow or to pass through to inner London destinations. The Borough is characterised by its low- density inter-war suburbs, including several original London County Council housing estates. Within the suburbs there is some mixed land use, increasing the need to travel to get to shops and services. Retail uses in the centre of Uxbridge, well served by public transport London Borough of Hillingdon Transport Interchanges HILLINGDON DESIGN AND ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT TRANSPORT INTERCHANGES Hillingdon Overview 05 1.8 There is little synergy between transport public transport corridors. This is necessary as interchanges and land uses, except in the design principles, treatment and type of Uxbridge town centre where recent new development differ substantially for each. developments have helped in providing a Interchanges have been categorised by type, walking environment conducive to linking tube, based on level and capacity of services bus and other modes of travel. The Public provided for, network linkage, and catchment Transport Accessibility Levels (PTALs) in area. Hillingdon never exceed Level 4 except in Uxbridge town centre, parts of Hayes and Category A: Heathrow, Uxbridge and Hayes Ruislip town centres1. and Harlington Interchange - The Intermodal Category A – Heathrow Airport transport interchange for London - Best 1.9 Heathrow, the world’s busiest Practice guidlines (TfL et al 2001) state that international airport, is in the south of the ‘Interchange occurs when people transfer from Borough and its importance as a multi modal one mode to another, or between two services transport interchange has national of the same mode. In addition people join or significance. Many trips made to Heathrow leave the public transport system on foot, by are on public transport using the Heathrow bicycle, motorcycle and car. Transport Express from Paddington, the Piccadilly line interchanges can be defined as: the place and bus, although many employees and where you change between modes or services visitors travel to Heathrow by car. or a purpose built facility to improve interchange quality. Transport Interchanges in Hillingdon Category B – Ruislip Station 1.11 At Category A stations, the modal split 1.10 In developing this design guidance, a ranges from air, rail and underground, to 1 Note: In “The Mayor’s draft London Plan, Report to the Association of Local Government – Areas of Intensification, MTRU, January 2003, it states that the current PTAL system is not distinction has been made between transport vehicles, buses, cyclists and pedestrians. sufficient to measure site accessibility outside Central London because the process interchanges as nodes where several routes Heathrow, Uxbridge and Hayes and Harlington measures accessibility to the nearest access point to the public transport system and does meet, and public transport interchanges along not take account of where people may wish to travel. Within Hillingdon, many public transport routes terminate and this limits the opportunity for multi-directional travel. London Borough of Hillingdon Transport Interchanges HILLINGDON DESIGN AND ACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT TRANSPORT INTERCHANGES Hillingdon Overview 06 are all interchanges of strategic or sub-regional interchanges, they often provide a place to wait importance in respect of bus to rail between trips on different transport modes. interchanges. Hayes and Harlington station has regional transport catchments although Category C: All other stations. train services are not as frequent as would be ideal for such a category. Heathrow is a special 1.14 At Category C stations, the modal split circumstance since its catchment as an ranges from rail and underground, to vehicles, international airport is very different to other buses, cyclists and pedestrians. These stations Category A interchanges. Its transport needs provide an important
Recommended publications
  • Pre-Departure Guide 2013

    Pre-Departure Guide 2013

    PRE-DEPARTURE GUIDE 2013 University Programmes LIBT London IBT Pre-departure Guide 2013 1 PREPARING OVERVIEW FOR YOUR DEPARTURE to London, United Kingdom Contents Welcome . 1 London: the world in one city . 2 Student services . 4 Entry clearance and visa guide . 5 Preparing to leave home . 6 Arriving in the UK . 7 Your first weeks in the UK . 11 Getting started at LIBT . 12 Practical information . 13 Important websites . 13 Welcome I warmly congratulate you on your in education and understanding the acceptance at London IBT Ltd, established cultural adjustments required when in association with Brunel University, students move to a new country . London . All staff at LIBT look forward to welcoming you and will assist you with all LIBT Reception is open Monday to Friday, the important aspects of your time with us . from 8 .30am to 5 00pm. The office is closed on weekends, however if you have an This Pre-Departure Guide for International emergency then we have a 24-hour helpline Students contains important information where one of the team will be able to assist . regarding your arrival in the UK . Please read through this guide before your arrival On behalf of the staff of LIBT, I wish you in the UK as it provides you with some success with your studies, an enjoyable and important information . rewarding time in London and, above all, your move towards your degree qualification You may be assured that we are all fully and the start of a successful career . committed to ensuring that your studies Christine Vincent with us are successful and I hope you find College Director / Principal your time with us an enjoyable one .
  • Walks Programme: July to September 2021

    Walks Programme: July to September 2021

    LONDON STROLLERS WALKS PROGRAMME: JULY TO SEPTEMBER 2021 NOTES AND ANNOUNCEMENTS IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING COVID-19: Following discussions with Ramblers’ Central Office, it has been confirmed that as organized ‘outdoor physical activity events’, Ramblers’ group walks are exempt from other restrictions on social gatherings. This means that group walks in London can continue to go ahead. Each walk is required to meet certain requirements, including maintenance of a register for Test and Trace purposes, and completion of risk assessments. There is no longer a formal upper limit on numbers for walks; however, since Walk Leaders are still expected to enforce social distancing, and given the difficulties of doing this with large numbers, we are continuing to use a compulsory booking system to limit numbers for the time being. Ramblers’ Central Office has published guidance for those wishing to join group walks. Please be sure to read this carefully before going on a walk. It is available on the main Ramblers’ website at www.ramblers.org.uk. The advice may be summarised as: - face masks must be carried and used, for travel to and from a walk on public transport, and in case of an unexpected incident; - appropriate social distancing must be maintained at all times, especially at stiles or gates; - you should consider bringing your own supply of hand sanitiser, and - don’t share food, drink or equipment with others. Some other important points are as follows: 1. BOOKING YOUR PLACE ON A WALK If you would like to join one of the walks listed below, please book a place by following the instructions given below.
  • Public Session

    Public Session

    PUBLIC SESSION MINUTES OF ORAL EVIDENCE taken before HIGH SPEED RAIL COMMITTEE On the HIGH SPEED RAIL (LONDON – WEST MIDLANDS) BILL Tuesday 23 June 2015 (Afternoon) In Committee Room 5 PRESENT: Mr Robert Syms (Chair) Mr Henry Bellingham Sir Peter Bottomley Ian Mearns _____________ IN ATTENDANCE Mr James Strachan QC, Counsel, Department for Transport Witnesses: Mr John Donovan Mr Robert Jones-Owen Mrs Beryl Upton Ms Kirsty Gibbs Ms KJ Alonso and Mr KJ West Ms Gayle Metcalfe and Pauline Woodham Mr Ian Phillips Ms Susan Crane and Mr David Crane Mr Henry Gardner, Governor, Vyners School _____________ IN PUBLIC SESSION INDEX Subject Page John Donovan, Beryl Upton, Robert Jones-Owen and others (continued) Closing submissions by Mr Donovan 3 Submissions by Mrs Upton 4 Submissions by Mr Jones-Owen 12 Response from Mr Strachan 18 Kirsty Gibbs and others Submissions by Ms Gibbs 28 Response from Mr Strachan 33 Ms KJ Alonso and Mr KJ West Submissions by Ms Alonso 36 Submissions by Mr West 37 Response from Mr Strachan 39 Gayle Metcalfe and Pauline Woodham and others Submissions by Ms Metcalfe 41 Response from Mr Strachan 50 Ian Phillips, Susan Crane and others Submissions by Mr Phillips 61 Submissions by Mr Crane 69 Submissions by Ms Crane 76 Response from Mr Strachan 79 The Governing Body of Vyners School Submissions by Mr Gardner 84 Response from Mr Strachan 99 2 1. CHAIR: Order, order. We’re back this afternoon with HS2 Select Committee, dealing with petitions 728, 717, 730, 729, 724 and 1264. Mr Donovan. John Donovan, Beryl Upton, Robert Jones-Owen and others (continued) 2.
  • Neighbourhood Policing Evaluation

    Neighbourhood Policing Evaluation

    Agenda Item 9 Neighbourhood Policing Evaluation London Area Baselining Study September 2009 British Transport Police 1 Contents_______________________________________ __________ Executive summary 2 Background 4 Methodology 6 Case Studies 1 Croydon 11 2 Wimbledon 19 3 Finsbury Park 27 4 Seven Sisters 35 5 Acton Mainline 41 6 Stratford 48 Officer survey findings 55 Appendix 58 Quality of Service Research Team Strategic Development Department Strategic Services Force Headquarters 25 Camden Road London, NW1 9LN Tel: 020 7830 8911 Email: [email protected] British Transport Police 2 Executive summary______________________________________ Many of the rail staff who took part in the evaluation spoke of feeling neglected by a police service that they perceived to be more engaged with its own organisational agenda than with the needs of its users. This was evidenced by the failure of BTP’s current policing arrangements to reflect the needs of staff effectively. Of great interest was the way in which many staff spoke of their hopes and expectations for the future. The introduction of NP was often described in glowing terms, considered capable of providing the visible, accessible and familiar police presence that staff thought was needed to close the gap that had developed between themselves and BTP. Indeed, the strongest message for NPTs is that staff confidence may appear low, but their expectations are high. It became clear throughout the evaluation that each site has its own narrative – its own unique collection of challenges, customs and conflicts which can only be understood by talking to those with ‘local’ knowledge. Indeed, as will become clear throughout the following report, the experiential knowledge of those who work on and regularly use the railways is at present a largely untapped resource.
  • 153 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route

    153 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route

    153 bus time schedule & line map 153 Finsbury Park Station View In Website Mode The 153 bus line (Finsbury Park Station) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Finsbury Park Station: 12:10 AM - 11:50 PM (2) Liverpool Street: 4:48 AM - 11:55 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 153 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 153 bus arriving. Direction: Finsbury Park Station 153 bus Time Schedule 33 stops Finsbury Park Station Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 12:10 AM - 11:50 PM Monday 12:10 AM - 11:50 PM Liverpool Street Station (C) Sun Street Passage, London Tuesday 12:10 AM - 11:50 PM Moorgate Station (B) Wednesday 12:10 AM - 11:50 PM 142-171 Moorgate, London Thursday 12:10 AM - 11:50 PM Finsbury Street (S) Friday 12:10 AM - 11:50 PM 72 Chiswell Street, London Saturday 12:10 AM - 11:50 PM Silk Street (BM) 47 Chiswell Street, London Barbican Station (BA) Aldersgate Street, London 153 bus Info Direction: Finsbury Park Station Clerkenwell Road / Old Street (BQ) Stops: 33 60 Goswell Road, London Trip Duration: 45 min Line Summary: Liverpool Street Station (C), Clerkenwell Road / St John Street Moorgate Station (B), Finsbury Street (S), Silk Street 64 Clerkenwell Road, London (BM), Barbican Station (BA), Clerkenwell Road / Old Street (BQ), Clerkenwell Road / St John Street, Aylesbury Street Aylesbury Street, Percival Street (UJ), Spencer Street 159-173 St John Street, London / City University (UK), Rosebery Avenue / Sadler's Wells Theatre (UL), St John Street / Goswell Road Percival Street (UJ) (P), Chapel Market (V), Penton Street / Islington St.
  • Underground Diary

    Underground Diary

    UNDERGROUND DIARY AUGUST 2009 On Saturday 1 August, an unattended item in a cross-passage between the Piccadilly Line platforms at King’s Cross suspended services between Hyde Park Corner and Arnos Grove from 12.05 for 40 minutes. A signal failure at Heathrow Terminal 5 began at 21.10 but had little effect on the service. However, a total failure at 23.20 suspended services between T123 and T5 through to the end of traffic. There was nothing untoward to note for Sunday 2 August. Monday 3 August may be summarised as follows: A Metropolitan Line train from Neasden depot accepted a wrong signal and ended up in the northbound Jubilee Line platform at Wembley Park at 06.10, the train then being returned to depot. A ‘bridge bash’ between Gunnersbury and Kew Gardens suspended the Richmond branch of the District Line from 12.00 to 12.45. Metropolitan Line service to the City suspended 15.15 to 16.05 – signal failure at Farringdon. A multiple signal failure between Hammersmith and Barons Court suspended the Piccadilly Line between Acton Town and Hyde Park Corner from 18.05 to 18.40. A northbound Victoria Line train stalled in Victoria platform at 10.00 on Tuesday 4 August, suspending services south of Warren Street. The offending train was reversed back to Victoria sidings and services resumed at 10.25. The service south of Warren Street was again suspended from 10.45 because of a person under a northbound train at Victoria. The passengers on the train stalled approaching Victoria were walked forward to the station and were clear by 12.00.
  • In Your Area 3: Ruislip and Ickenham

    In Your Area 3: Ruislip and Ickenham

    LOCAL AREA High Speed Rail Consultation In Your Area 3: Ruislip and Ickenham Find out here about: • what is proposed between Ruislip and Ickenham; • what this means for people living in and around Ruislip and Ickenham; and • what would happen during construction. What is proposed between What this means for people Ruislip and Ickenham? living in and around Ruislip and Ickenham. From Northolt Junction heading north west the proposed route for the high speed line would Property and Land be joined by the existing Chiltern Line from For much of its length the existing railway Marylebone, and from that point the two lines, corridor is bounded by residential and light and the Central Line, would run alongside each industrial or commercial properties. While we other to West Ruislip. have kept the amount of land needed to a minimum, we expect that around 10 homes This would mean widening the existing railway would need to be demolished. These are corridor to accommodate the two high speed scattered along this section of the route. tracks, which – from Northolt Junction Additionally, a number of properties could be westwards – would lie on the north-eastern at risk of having some land taken, generally edge of the existing railway. where gardens back onto the line although it The route would pass to the north of West may prove that many of these may not be Ruislip station and would pass under Ickenham affected after all. Road. It would then pass through the southern If a decision is taken to go ahead with the high edge of Ruislip Golf Course crossing the River speed line, we will carry out more detailed Pinn and Breakspear Road South on a new design of the route, including considering the bridge, before passing westwards into a cutting.
  • UNDERGROUND DIARY JANUARY 2018 with Monday 1 January Already Covered in the Previous Issue, We Begin with Tuesday 2 January

    UNDERGROUND DIARY JANUARY 2018 with Monday 1 January Already Covered in the Previous Issue, We Begin with Tuesday 2 January

    UNDERGROUND DIARY JANUARY 2018 With Monday 1 January already covered in the previous issue, we begin with Tuesday 2 January. At 23.35 the Bakerloo Line was suspended north of Queen’s Park because of items blown onto the track by the high winds south of Kensal Green – a metal obstruction and a tarpaulin under a southbound train. The service remained suspended until the end of traffic. A loss of all point indications in Morden Depot from 22.10 initially resulted in a 35-minute suspension south of Tooting Broadway, with delays continuing until the end of traffic following points being secured and restricted access to the depot, the last being 30 minutes late stabling, with several trains stabled elsewhere. The strong winds continued early on Wednesday 3 January. A tree blown onto the track from a private property on the approach to Ickenham was struck by the first eastbound Metropolitan Line train, suspending services on the Uxbridge line. The first eastbound Piccadilly Line train from Uxbridge, which follows the first Metropolitan Line train, was stalled to the rear until 06.20. Once cleared, services resumed at 06.55. The train was damaged in the incident but not seriously enough to prevent it being worked in service to Harrow, where it was detrained and worked empty to Neasden Depot. In the meanwhile, nine Northern Line trains were cancelled from Morden Depot because of stock imbalance (q.v.). An air burst on a southbound train at Kenton at 23.35 suspended the Bakerloo Line north of Stonebridge Park until the end of traffic.
  • River Pinn to Breakspear Road

    River Pinn to Breakspear Road

    London West Midlands HS2 Hillingdon Traffic and Construction Impacts Contents Page number 1 Executive summary ................................................................................................. 1 2 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 2 2.1 General .................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 Traffic Flows ............................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Sustainable Placement ............................................................................................ 3 3 Options to be carried forward and to be considered by the Promoter for inclusion within contractual documentation ................................................................................. 5 3.1 Re-use of excavated material from Copthall Cutting to construct Harvil Road Embankments .................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Construction of bridge structures instead of railway embankments – River Pinn to Breakspear Road ............................................................................................................ 9 3.3 Use of excavated material for interval embankment between HS2 and Chiltern Lines 19 3.4 Commence importation of material earlier in the programme ........................... 21 3.5 Retention of Railway ‘Up-Sidings’ at
  • Finsbury Park

    Finsbury Park

    FINSBURY PARK Park Management Plan 2020 (minor amendments January 2021) Finsbury Park: Park Management Plan amended Jan 2021 Section Heading Page Contents Foreword by Councillor Hearn 4 Draft open space vision in Haringey 5 Purpose of the management plan 6 1.0 Setting the Scene 1.1 Haringey in a nutshell 7 1.2 The demographics of Haringey 7 1.3 Deprivation 8 1.4 Open space provision in Haringey 8 2.0 About Finsbury Park 2.1 Site location and description 9 2.2 Facilities 9 2.3 Buildings 17 2.4 Trees 18 3.0 A welcoming place 3.1 Visiting Finsbury Park 21 3.2 Entrances 23 3.3 Access for all 24 3.4 Signage 25 3.5 Toilet facilities and refreshments 26 3.6 Events 26 4.0 A clean and well-maintained park 4.1 Operational and management responsibility for parks 30 4.2 Current maintenance by Parks Operations 31 4.3 Asset management and project management 32 4.4 Scheduled maintenance 34 4.5 Setting and measuring service standards 38 4.6 Monitoring the condition of equipment and physical assets 39 4.7 Tree maintenance programme 40 4.8 Graffiti 40 4.9 Maintenance of buildings, equipment and landscape 40 4.10 Hygiene 40 5.0 Healthy, safe and secure place to visit 5.1 Smoking 42 5.2 Alcohol 42 5.3 Walking 42 5.4 Health and safety 43 5.5 Reporting issues with the ‘Love Clean Streets’ app 44 5.6 Community safety and policing 45 5.7 Extending Neighbourhood Watch into parks 45 5.8 Designing out crime 46 5.9 24 hour access 48 5.10 Dogs and dog control orders 49 6.0 Sustainability 6.1 Greenest borough strategy 51 6.2 Pesticide use 51 6.3 Sustainable use of
  • The-Story-Behind-The-Xmas-Kings

    The-Story-Behind-The-Xmas-Kings

    Know When To Run: The Story Behind The Xmas Kings Cross Problems ! 11:50, 24 January 2015 " John Bull (http://www.londonreconnections.com/author/admin/) — 244 Comments # (http://www.londonreconnections.com/2015/know-run-story-behind-xmas-kings-cross-problems/#comments) Delays and work overruns aren’t an uncommon part of the Christmas experience on London’s railways. Ultimately, maintenance and improvement needs to be carried out and from a utilitarian perspective the opportunity to do so in a period where passenger numbers are generally lower is simply too good to miss. It is rare, however, to see quite the level of disruption and overcrowding that was witnessed at Finsbury Park and on the East Coast Main Line last Christmas as a result of overrunning works between there and Kings Cross. Indeed, whilst it was not quite the disaster that the media and some politicians seemed determine to make it, it was certainly extreme enough to warrant further investigation, and a full report into what happened was swiftly commissioned by Network Rail. That report is now out (http://cdn.londonreconnections.com/2013/kingscrossdisruption.pdf), and it makes interesting reading. For it provides a window into the events that happened that weekend. Some serious works This particular Christmas period was a busy one for railway work. With Christmas falling on a Thursday, Network Rail were presented with what they saw as a rare four day period in which to carry out engineering work. Closures for the entire period would, of course, need to be avoided wherever possible, but it was still an opportunity.
  • West Ruislip Station – Zone 6 I Onward Travel Information Local Area Map Bus Map

    West Ruislip Station – Zone 6 I Onward Travel Information Local Area Map Bus Map

    West Ruislip Station – Zone 6 i Onward Travel Information Local Area Map Bus Map 39 O N E AT S 17 R ACRE 56 C St. Martin’s 15 O L D P R I O R Y H SOUTHCOTE RISE 444 10 A Church R 50 47 D C 35 L H O Southcote 12 S I E E Clinic G U n 31 S n A K i N N E O H E E P S L A T H V r A R P A S H S e iv T 76 48 8 T R S R R H E 28 U A 1 D E 3 36 5 A 9 H O T R H R E N N O F A E I M 1 T L E 25 20 G L E 53 D A N 24 L R L 80 I 19 I L M S H A N O E R R O A D E 25 U S 19 N E H 20 O S E C L A E V 33 G R A TA 9 O T P F C H I S E FIELD CLOSE L 3 C D W L R 60 A 3 A Y U River Pinn N H Y A E C W 2 D L E I 96 F A D R O 12 16 28 D ’ S 27 A R 11 17 D W G E K I N Ruislip Heathfield Rise/Glenhurst Avenue 33 71 34 F I E R D ’ S R O A D L D N G E D WA W K I U10 AY E E 21 35 S 45 N I 15 A R Heathfield Rise Woodville Gardens L L King Edwards L Hill Lane L I L H 31 Medical Centre I 48 H Field Way E Y U A W H I L L R I S E N S 2 H ’ Ruislip E R C Westcote Rise Orchard Close V 15 A O N A M 1 Golf Course H C R 20 Manor Road U 15 H Southcote Rise 120 20 C Sharps Lane D A S 1 H O Sharps Lane Neats Acre Ruislip A R Ruislip R P Methodist S M 87 Golf Course A L H Church Ruislip A E N N I CK 33 Golf Course E 36 Ruislip High Street/The Oaks The Orchard, Premier Inn Ruislip Ruislip High Street/Midcroft The yellow tinted area includes every S H D bus stop up to one-and-a-half miles A A Ruislip High Street/Brickwall Lane R RO Ruislip P M Ruislip 44 from West Ruislip.