The Arizona Radio Observatory: a New 12-M Telescope and Other Developments

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Arizona Radio Observatory: a New 12-M Telescope and Other Developments The Arizona Radio Observatory: A New 12-M Telescope and Other Developments Robert W. Freund*1, Lucy M. Ziurys2, Eugene F. Lauria3, George P. Reiland4 lThe University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0065, USA, (520)626-7714, (520)621-5554 FAX, [email protected], 2(520)621-6525, [email protected], 3(520)626-1098, [email protected], 4(520)626-6744, [email protected] Abstract The Arizona Radio Observatory (ARO) operates two radio telescopes in the millimeter and sub-millimeter wavelength region. Recently, one of these instruemnts, the aging, former NRAO 12 meter telescope on Kitt Peak, was replaced with one of the 12 m ALMA prototype antennas. The high performance design of this new instrument, including its 20 microns surface and sub-arcsecond pointing, will expand observational capabilites at the ARO. New receivers and backends are also in development at ARO. A dual polarization sideband separating SIS mixer covering the 0.7 mm atmospheric windw, ranging from 385 GHz to 500 GHz, has been installed as a facility instrument on the Sub-Millimeter Telescope (SMT) on Mount Graham. A prototype Band 2 receiever, based on HEMT amplifier technology, has been built and tested on the sky. These new additions and other developments will be presented. 1. Introduction Astronomical observations at millimeter and sub-millimeter wavelengths are routinely performed at the two telescopes operated by the Arizona Radio Observatory (ARO) at the University of Arizona. One telescope, the 10-meter diameter Sub-Millimeter Telescope (SMT), is located at an exceptional site at 3186.0 m on Mount Graham, 160 km east of Tucson, Arizona. The other telescope, the 12-Meter telescope, is located at 1914 m on Kitt Peak, 80 km west of Tucson. Both observatories employ high sensitivity near quantum limited heterodyne receivers matched to the atmospheric characteristics above their respective site. Backend instrumentation include stable, multi-resolution spectrometers to support molecular line observations, and classical continuum detector systems. The SMT facility IF system and all its radiometers support 4 GHz wide channels. The antenna at the SMT, shown in Figure 1, uses a high precision reflector attached to honeycomb panels supported on a thermally stable carbon-fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) structure. Excellent performance is obtained from the panel’s 15 µm RMS surface accuracy permitting observations well into the sub-millimeter wavelength region, even as short as 300 µm, unaffected by diurnal temperature variations. The venerable 12-Meter antenna on Kitt Peak, originally constructed by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory’s (NRAO) in 1967 and subsequently upgraded in 1984, was recently retired and removed from the site. It was replaced by one of the two 12-m diameter ALMA evaluation antennas. Early last year, ARO obtained this antenna from the European Southern Observatory (ESO) and moved it from the Very Large Array (VLA) site west of Socorro, Figure 1. The ARO 10-meter New Mexico, to Kitt Peak, Arizona. The new antenna will enable the ARO to SMT on Mount Graham, continue supporting astronomical research at the longer millimeter wavelengths Arizona. well into the future. The ARO emphasizes instrumentation, infrastructure, and observational techniques that enable coherent detection and identification techniques of extremely weak signals in spectrally confused regions. Both telescopes have played important roles in millimeter VLBI, and are participating in the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) and other projects. 2. A New 12-m Telescope on Kitt Peak In the summer of 2002, the construction of the two evaluation antennas of the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA) Project began at the National Radio Astronomy Observatory’s Antenna Test Facility at the Very Large Array (VLA) in New Mexico. Nine years later, their jobs complete, the community was notified that the antennas were no longer required by the Project and would become available. Last March, the ARO obtained ownership of the high performance European Southern Observatory’s (ESO) evaluation antenna. A plan was quickly developed that involved separating the antenna into two large pieces suitable for truck transport to Kitt Peak, the 650 kilometers west of the VLA. The plan involved separating the reflector from its supporting pedestal/receiver cabin. One difficulty for transport was that the reflector backing structure and receiver cabin were both constructed from CFRP, and thus major pieces were held 978-1-4673-5225-3/14/$31.00 ©2014 IEEE together by glue. Fortunately, the reflector was connected to the receiver cabin primarily with multiple bolts, as well as numerous CFRP interconnecting vanes that had to be cut. Most of the external protrusions such as platforms, stairs, cable wraps, thermal insulation and the prime focus quadrapod were removed from the Figure 3. The new ARO 12-Meter structures. Their removal Antenna on Kitt Peak, Arizona. was necessary to reduce the Figure 2. ESO 12-meter evaluation overall dimensions so that antenna located at the VLA site, NM. the pedestal and reflector could fit under the highway bridges that would be encountered along the way. To accomplish this removal, most of the telescope wiring was removed, one of the larger tasks of the project. Shown in Figure 2 is the ESO evaluation antenna located at the VLA site before disassembly and the start of the transportation process. Figure 3 shows the antenna within the 12-Meter observatory dome without its quadrapod shorting after arriving on Kitt Peak in December 2014. A transportation company that specialized in moving heavy and bulky items, Precision Heavy Haul of Phoenix, AZ, provided the customized vehicles, special moving fixtures and expertise. During the second week of last November, the 9 ton reflector was removed from its 75 ton pedestal. Then the pedestal was fitted into its custom transportation fixture and lifted onto a special trailer to begin its trip to Kitt Peak. After traveling for one week, the pedestal arrived safely at the observatory on Kitt Peak. During a snow storm, the pedestal was lifted into the 12-Meter dome and bolted to its new foundation. Two weeks later, the process started again, with the reflector being loaded onto its specialized trailer. A week later, the reflector was slid through the opening in the 12-Meter dome with about 1cm to spare on either side. It was placed onto the waiting receiver cabin completing the transportation phase of the relocation. The last step in the relocation process is to restore the antenna to its pre-move state. The external platforms, stairs, cable wraps, insulation have already been installed, and the prime-focus quadrapod will follow. All the removed wiring will be restored and some of the power wiring will be modified to accommodate North American power standards rather than the European or Chilean power for which it was designed. New software will be developed to interface with the telescope’s computer. The existing dual polarization 3 mm SBS receiver and facility IF system will be the first radiometer components to be installed on the new antenna. Commissioning with this instrumentation package will commence during late spring with observations resuming following the monsoons at the end of the summer. Later, the new 4 mm (Band 2) receiver is be installed, based on a prototype tested on the old 12 M before decommissioning. After upgrading the existing 2 mm receiver, a copy of the ARO 1.3 mm receiver will be constructed to support the expanding needs of the VLBI community. Coherent Receivers The goal of the ARO is to provide stable, high 385-500 GHz Receiver, with grid, IF = 5 GHz sensitivity, single sideband heterodyne receivers 2/25/14 utilizing SIS devices to its user community. Receivers with these characteristics permit the 350 detection and unambiguous identification of spectral 300 line emissions at levels limited only by the available 250 (K) V-pol. T LSB integration time. Observing programs requiring 200 rssb integration times as long as 100 hours are not T 150 V-pol. T USB uncommon. To maximize the system sensitivity, all 100 H-pol. T LSB ARO receivers detect both orthogonally polarized 50 H-pol. T USB signals. Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) 0 programs are also supported at ARO facilities. The 400 420 440 460 480 500 520 ARO telescopes now support receivers in all 6 LO Frequency (GHz) atmospheric windows from 4 mm to 0.4 mm; 4 - 3, 2, 1.3, 0.8, 0.7, and 0.4 mm. Figure 4. Noise temperatures of the 0.7 mm SBS dual polarization receiver. Three different SIS single-sideband dual polarization receivers operate on Kitt Peak. They cover the 2 atmospheric windows, from 65 GHz at the low end to 170 GHz at the high end. Even though all 3 receivers are single sideband, only the 3 mm receiver employs sideband separating (SBS) mixers that reject energy from the unwanted image band, thus improving the spectroscopic sensitivity. The 2 mm receiver employs waveguide tuning to filter out the unwanted sideband, The new 4 mm receiver will achieve SSB operation through sideband-separation at E-band, already demonstrated on the Band 2 prototype. At the SMT, the 1.3 mm receiver operates from 210 GHz to 283 GHz. The 0.8 mm and 0.4 mm atmospheric windows are cover by receivers using a pair of double sideband (DSB) mixers. The frequency ranges covered are 275 – 370 GHz and 620 - 720 GHz respectively These 3 SMT receivers use wire grids for polarization separation. The most recent ARO receiver utilizes a new SIS material technology in its mixer design to cover the 0.4 mm atmospheric window. It operates from 385 GHz to 500 GHz. and uses 2 – unbalanced SBS mixers to receive the 2 orthogonally polarized signals.
Recommended publications
  • Birds of Coniferous Forest on Mount Graham, Arizona
    Wilson Bull., 107(4), 1995, pp. 719-723 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS Birds of coniferous forest on Mount Graham, Arizona.-Because of interest in the effect upon the biota of Mount Graham by current development for astronomy, I repeated observations and censuses made there forty years ago. Avifaunal changes have occurred. Unlike my companion study in the Sierra Nevada (Marshall 1988), the losses at Mount Graham of nesting species-all at the lower altitudinal limit of Pinus Zeiophylla chihuahuana and P. ponderosa arizonica-lack an obvious connection to human interference with the environment. Study area.-Mount Graham, in southeastern Arizona, is capped with old growth Engel- mann spruce and alpine fir from 3000 m to the summit at 3267 m. This boreal forest of 8 km* is at its southernmost limits on the North American continent. Descending, one passes through other vegetation zones in sequence: Douglas firs and white firs mixed with spruce, and then mixed with Mexican white pines; south slopes of New Mexican locust and Gambel oak; ponderosa pine with Gambel oak, ponderosa pine mixed with silver-leaf oak; and finally Chihuahua pine with Arizona oak (Martin and Fletcher 1943, Hoffmeister 1956, Marshall 1957, Mohlenbrock 1987). From memory, notes, and photographs I detect no change in vegetation during the forty-year study period. Specifically, the trees at the mapped census area in Wet Canyon (Fig. 1) have not closed ranks about the little openings suitable for those foothill birds that forage among grasses, boulders, manzanitas, and nolinas. The mesic luxuriance of Mount Graham’s vegetation is shown by running streams sup- porting tall groves of maples, by the enormous Douglas firs that remain, by the profusion of understory flowers and green forbs, and by the gigantic stature of clear-trunked alders dominating Wet Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • 236 Pinaleño Mountains in the Twentieth Century Atalanta Hoyt
    Pinaleño Mountains in the Twentieth Century Atalanta Hoyt Throughout the twentieth century, a few major events dominated the history of the Forest Service. First, the founding of the National Forest Service in 1905 replaced the Bureau of Forestry and led to the creation of modern National Forests. The new service was created under the jurisdiction of the Department of Agriculture with the purpose of securing a long term supply of timber for the American people.1 Second, the great depression of the 1930s, Franklin Roosevelt’s creation of the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) and the expansion of the Forest Service changed the shape of National Forests.2 This time period featured a major transition from timber management to hands on putting resources into the forest. The Forest Service and CCC planted trees, carved trails, built roads, and conducted research; actively molding forests and applying the latest forestry techniques instead of letting the forest take its course.3 A third period of great change came in the 1970s during the environmental era.4 The emphasis changed from conceptualizing the forests as resources to be converted into marketable goods to seeing them as wilderness in need of preservation. While conservation has always been an important part of the Forest Service - advocated by both those who saw an intrinsic value in wilderness and by those who used the wilderness for recreational purposes - increased urbanization highlighted the uniqueness of forests. Efforts to catalog and protect the environments of forests became a main priority while ecologists and conservationists gained status.5 These three main shifts defined the Forest Service in the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona IGHWAYJ:~~-= E.Mber · · · - Narrow and Unsafe Bridges
    ARIZOnA IGHWAYJ:~~-= E.mBER · · · - Narrow and Unsafe Bridges A Lasting Monument . TO A GREATENGINEER Are Quickly, Economically and Lastingly Replaced With UILDER, executive, soldier, friend - Tom O'Connell has joined that silent host of Billustrious engi neers whose achievements are their end uring monuments. Armco Multi Plate Waterways His death on November 3, 1937, mark ed the end of a career of distinguished service Full Circles 01· Arches, Singly or in Battery, they care for streams up to his state and country ·that covered a period of almost a quarter of .a century. Time, to several hundred square feet in cross sectional area. Write for Illus­ immutable yardstick of values, will list his name conspiciously in the roll of those who trated Literature. built America's great Southwest. His works will long live af ter him. Western Metal ManufacturingCompany 1500 South Central Avenue P. 0. Box 1585 Phoenix, Arizona DECEMBER,1937 ARIZONA HIGHWAYS 3 The courtesy of the open range was are many denominational hospital s and Tucson numbers some of the most pr om­ th e rule most of th e time, except when sanitoriums, private sanitoriums, rest inent people, and man y of them come the Apaches went on a rampage, slaying, homes and "rest ranches," where privacy just for th e rod eo. Tucs on is also host pillaging and running off all available and specialized supervision are ava ilable. to many persons of international fam e. livestock. A welcome to strangers One of the most outstanding of these Each year it is becoming more and mor e meant offering the best.
    [Show full text]
  • Mount Graham Red Squirrel Recovery Plan
    MOUNT GRAHAM RED SQUIRREL Tamiasciurus hudsonicus arahamensie RECOVERY PLAN Prepared by Lesley A. Fitzpatrick, Member, Recovery Team U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Phoenix, Arizona Genice F. Froehlich, Consultant, Recovery Team U.S.D.A. Forest Service Coronado National Forest Safford, Arizona Terry B. Johnson, Member, Recovery Team Arizona Game and Fish Department Phoenix, Arizona Randall A. Smith, Leader, Mt. Graham Red Squirrel Recovery Team U.S.D.A. Forest Service Coronado National Forest Tucson, Arizona R. Barry Spicer Arizona Game and Fish Department Phoenix, Arizona for Region 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico Date: Disclaimer Page Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions which are believed to be required to recover and/or protect the species. Plans are prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, sometimes with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and others. Objectives will only be attained and funds expended contingent upon appropriations, priorities, and other budgetary constraints. Recovery plans do not necessarily represent the views nor the official positions or approvals of any individuals or agencies, other than the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, involved in the plan formulation. They represent the official position of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service & after they have been signed by the Regional Director as aDproved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. Literature citations should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1992. Mount Graham Red Squirrel Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Memo 67 SKA Demonstrators, 2005 Assessment by the Engineering Working Group
    Memo 67 SKA Demonstrators, 2005 Assessment by the Engineering Working Group P. J. Hall (EWG Chair), On Behalf of the Group 01/12/05 www.skatelescope.org/pages/page_memos.htm 2 Table of Contents Section Page Summary Remarks 3 Appendix 1 – Reviews of 2005 SKA Demonstrator Updates Chinese Demonstrator (FAST) 10 Canadian Demonstrator (CLAR) 13 US Demonstrators (ATA, DSAN) 16 European Demonstrator (EMBRACE) 19 South African Demonstrator (KAT) 22 Appendix 2 – Guidelines for Reviewers 29 Appendix 3 – SKA Demonstrator Updates for 2005 33 (PDF documents Appended as Submitted) 3 SKA Demonstrators – Summary Remarks Peter Hall, 1 December 2005 1. Introduction The EWG has considered the five SKA demonstrator submissions received. In four cases these submissions were brief updates of previous (2004) detailed expositions. However, an initial outline of the Karoo Array Telescope (KAT) was received from the South African SKA Consortium and the EWG devoted extra effort to a more thorough assessment of this project. No demonstrator updates were received from Australia or India although the Australian SKA Consortium submitted a background report in the form of the statutory annual report for their Major National Research Facility program (available at http://www.atnf.csiro.au/projects/mnrf2001/Astronomy_MNRF_0405.pdf). While this report does not contain detailed schedule information for the proposed Extended New Technology Demonstrator (xNTD) project, it does indicate that the SKA Molonglo Prototype (SKAMP) program is still largely on track. However, additional enquiries indicate that SKAMP development beyond mid-2007 still depends on as yet uncertain funding. It should also be mentioned that KAT and xNTD are very similar instruments and much of the EWG commentary is likely to apply to both projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report
    United States Department of Agriculture Coronado National Forest Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report Forest Service Southwestern Region Coronado National Forest July 2017 Potential Wilderness Area Evaluation Report In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • NRAO Enews: Vol. 10, Issue 7
    NRAO eNews Volume 10, Issue 7 • 10 August 2017 Upcoming Events ALMA Long Baseline Workshop (http://alma­ intweb.mtk.nao.ac.jp/~diono/meetings/longBL2017/) Oct 3 ­ 5, 2017 | Mielparque Kyoto, Japan 6th VLA Data Reduction Workshop (http://go.nrao.edu/vla­drw) Oct 23 ­ 27, 2017 | Socorro, NM 2017 Jansky Lecture (https://science.nrao.edu/science/jansky­lecture/speakers/2017­jansky­ lecturer­dr­bernard­fanaroff) Oct 24, 2017 | Charlottesville, VA 2017 Jansky Lecture (https://science.nrao.edu/science/jansky­lecture/speakers/2017­jansky­ lecturer­dr­bernard­fanaroff) Oct 27, 2017 | Green Bank Observatory, WV 2017 Jansky Lecture (https://science.nrao.edu/science/jansky­lecture/speakers/2017­jansky­ lecturer­dr­bernard­fanaroff) Nov 3, 2017 | Socorro, NM NRAO Town Hall at the Jan 2018 AAS Meeting (https://science.nrao.edu/science/meetings/2018/aas­231/town­hall) Jan 11, 2018 | National Harbor, MD The Very Large Array Today and Tomorrow: First Molecules to Life on Exoplanets (https://science.nrao.edu/science/meetings/2018/aas­231/vla) Jan 11, 2018 | National Harbor, MD The Very Large Array Today and Tomorrow: First Molecules to Life on Exoplanets Eric Murphy The NRAO will convene a Special Session entitled The Very Large Array Today and Tomorrow: First Molecules to Life on Exoplanets on 11 January 2018 in National Harbor, Maryland, near Washington, D.C. during the 231st Meeting of the American Astronomical Society (AAS). The Very Large Array (VLA) has had a major impact on nearly every branch of astronomy, and the results of its research are abundant in the pages of scientific journals and textbooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Indicator Species of the Kaibab National Forest: an Evaluation of Population and Habitat Trends Version 3.0 2010
    Management Indicator Species of the Kaibab National Forest: an evaluation of population and habitat trends Version 3.0 2010 Isolated aspen stand. Photo by Heather McRae. Pygmy nuthatch. Photo by the Smithsonian Inst. Pumpkin Fire, Kaibab National Forest Mule deer. Photo by Bill Noble Red-naped sapsucker. Photo by the Smithsonian Inst. Northern Goshawk © Tom Munson Tree encroachment, Kaibab National Forest Prepared by: Valerie Stein Foster¹, Bill Noble², Kristin Bratland¹, and Roger Joos³ ¹Wildlife Biologist, Kaibab National Forest Supervisor’s Office ²Forest Biologist, Kaibab National Forest, Supervisor’s Office ³Wildlife Biologist, Kaibab National Forest, Williams Ranger District Table of Contents 1. MANAGEMENT INDICATOR SPECIES ................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 4 Regulatory Background ...................................................................................................... 8 Management Indicator Species Population Estimates ...................................................... 10 SPECIES ACCOUNTS ................................................................................................ 18 Aquatic Macroinvertebrates ...................................................................................... 18 Cinnamon Teal .......................................................................................................... 21 Northern Goshawk ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0809.2227V1
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. 8893 c ESO 20181 October 31, 2018 Testing the inverse-Compton catastrophe scenario in the intra-day variable blazar S50716+71 III. Rapid and correlated flux density variability from radio to sub-mm bands L. Fuhrmann1,2,3, T. P. Krichbaum1, A. Witzel1, A. Kraus1, S. Britzen1, S. Bernhart1, C. M. V. Impellizzeri1, I. Agudo1,4, J. Klare1, B. W. Sohn1,5, E. Angelakis1, U. Bach1,3, K. E.´ Gab´anyi1,6,7, E. K¨ording8, A. Pagels1,J. A. Zensus1, S. J. Wagner9, L. Ostorero10,11, H. Ungerechts12, M. Grewing13, M. Tornikoski14, A. J. Apponi15, B. Vila-Vilar´o16, L. M. Ziurys15, R. G. Strom17 1 Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Radioastronomie, Auf dem H¨ugel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany 2 Dipartimento di Fisica, Universit`adi Perugia, Via A. Pascoli, 06123 Perugia, Italy 3 INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Torino, via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino Torinese (TO), Italy 4 Instituto de Astrof´ısica de Andaluc´ıa, CSIC, Apartado 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain 5 Korea Astronomy & Space Science Institute, 61-1 Hwaam-dong, 305-348 Daejeon 6 Hungarian Academy of Sciences Research Group for Physical Geodesy and Geodynamics, Budapest, Hungary 7 FOMI¨ Satellite Geodetic Observatory, Budapest, Hungary 8 School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom 9 Landessternwarte Heidelberg-K¨onigstuhl, K¨onigstuhl, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany 10 Dipartimento di Fisica Generale “Amedeo Avogadro”, Universit`adegli Studi di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 TORINO, Italy 11 Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, Italy 12 Institut de Radio Astronomie Millim´etrique, Avenida Divina Pastora 7, Local 20, 18012 Granada, Spain 13 Institut de Radio Astronomie Millim´etrique, 300 Rue de la Piscine, Domaine Universitaire de Grenoble, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Modelling the Population Dynamics of the Mt. Graham Red Squirrel: Can We Predict Its Future in a Changing Environment with Multiple Threats?
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION 131 (2006) 121– 131 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biocon Modelling the population dynamics of the Mt. Graham red squirrel: Can we predict its future in a changing environment with multiple threats? S.P. Rushtona, D.J.A. Woodb, P.W.W. Lurza,*, J.L. Koprowskib aIRES, School of Biology, Devonshire Building, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK bWildlife Conservation and Management, School of Natural Resources, 325 Biological Sciences East, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The Mt. Graham red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus grahamensis; MGRS) is among the Received 25 April 2005 most critically endangered mammals in the United States and is isolated on the periphery Received in revised form of the species’ range, potentially increasing its conservation priority. To investigate poten- 31 January 2006 tial threats to the population and provide a tool for land managers, we developed a spatially Accepted 24 February 2006 explicit population dynamics model. We tested model predictions using available range- Available online 17 April 2006 wide data from the literature and field work specific to the MGRS. A general model input data set using mean life history values overpredicted MGRS abundance. However, we found Keywords: significant correlation with known squirrel abundance using a general data set with cur- Conservation tailed fecundity and survival. A model with MGRS-specific data provided the best fit to SEPM observed population size. We investigated potential impacts of two major threats to the Endangered species MGRS: competition from introduced Abert’s squirrels (Sciurus aberti) and increased levels Introduced species of predation.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Astronomy Institute"-Radioscience Laboratory, Stanford Univefsity - Frank D
    Up 1h~ {~Ji()}Oec41.,! t;7/JI~,.rt5 vel ,J-~cpt:fT ~)11. I ~ SqP1~ /? /lA.f "'6~n~ ~ 6V"C~Mk';, .-.If?t)J M4fer Z,I/ lCJop.r - ~.t'1 ..r I'e-t ".r . !l4'C~1/ ,-1"1/}'/ , 70. f!ql'~ ~ N.~ - 1. .. I. r--/,./r ~ ~ J ! "c ~r~1H ,-~/~ POT- SHors NO · IISI Don't take the -Pr'esent m oment too sertousld;J gt ~"n' be h ere for to~. :TABLE b: SCORECARD ;1Lt. ,A. ,Never /yery REPORT Numbel' of Number i* Operation Number in operation Number eventually Number 'eventually unlikely Identifiable ~ 15 yr *fter report ,;;; 15 yr after report built with built with Items with mostly federal with mostly other ' mostly federal mostly other Requested funding , fundingCs tate, funding funding ptiyate, foreign) Whitford 13 6 0 0 , 1 6 Greenstein 21 5 (+1 similar) 2' 4 1 8 Fie ld 21 3 (+2 similar) 2 3 2 9 Baheall 29 11 6 5 () 7 McKee-Taylor 23 8 1 5 3 6 TOTAL 106 33 (::t, 3 similar) 11 17 7 36 /" PANEL ON ASTRONOMICAL FACILITIES A. E. W bittw:d.. Chairman, Lick ObsefvatofY, University of California R. N. lJrqcewell, Radio Astronomy Institute"-Radioscience Laboratory, Stanford Univefsity - Frank D. Drake, Department of Astronomy, Cornell Univefsity Frederick T. Haddock, Jr., Radio Astronomy Observatory, University of Michigan ,..-----William Liller, Department of Astronomy, Harvard University W. W. Morgan, Yerkes Observatory, University of Chicago Bruce H. Rule, California Institute of Technology · ·-~\llan R. Sandage, Mt. Wilson and Palomar Observatories, California Institute of Technology, Carnegie Institution of Washington Whit£ODd - publ .
    [Show full text]