DOCSLIB.ORG

Foundation Rituals and the Culture of Building in Ancient Greece

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foundation Rituals and the Culture of Building in Ancient Greece FOUNDATION RITUALS AND THE CULTURE OF BUILDING IN ANCIENT GREECE Gloria R. Hunt A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Art. Chapel Hill 2006 Approved by Advisor: Donald C. Haggis Reader: Jaroslav Folda Reader: Robin F. Rhodes Reader: G. Kenneth Sams Reader: Mary C. Sturgeon ©2006 Gloria R. Hunt ii ABSTRACT GLORIA R. HUNT: Foundation Rituals and the Culture of Building in Ancient Greece (Under the direction of Donald C. Haggis) This dissertation examines the evidence for foundation rituals in post-Bronze Age Greece while investigating their function and meaning in ancient Greek culture. Foundation rituals are prescribed rites known throughout the ancient Mediterranean that marked the initiation of a buildings’ construction, usually with a combination of prayer, sacrifice, and the burial of foundation deposits containing offerings of various types and/or sacrificial material. These distinctive deposits were ritually interred during the beginning stages of construction, usually within the fabric of the structure itself. The discovery of foundation deposits in association with cult architecture from all over the ancient Greek world and from every historical period attests that foundation rituals were regular features of sacred building. This dissertation presents all published foundation deposits in their archaeological contexts and identifies patterns in placement, method of deposition, type of material deposited, and geographic distribution. Reconstructed from the archaeological evidence, ancient Greek foundation rituals are related to the broader history of foundation rituals in the ancient Mediterranean, especially to the traditions of Egypt and Mesopotamia. Of particular importance are the formal similarities Greek foundation deposits share with those of Near Eastern cultures, an affinity which appears especially intense in East Greece and other areas where contact with the Near East was strongest. This dissertation argues that Greek foundation rituals iii are Near Eastern in origin and were likely developed through contact with these cultures, further illustrating the impact of eastern traditions on Greek sacred architecture. The archaeological and historical context of Greek foundation deposits provides a foundation for the investigation of the meaning and function of foundation rituals in ancient Greek culture. One of the principal functions of Mediterranean foundation rituals was to forge the public perception of a socially advantageous link between patrons of buildings and the gods they honor. This dissertation maintains that Greek foundation rituals similarly underscored a close relationship between human patrons and divinities through the topos of building, in which the sanction and assistance of the gods were perceived to play major roles. This view is substantiated by the portrayal of building and builders in Greek myth, where the procurement and elaboration of sacred space frequently result from divine guidance or miracle, and not human industry. This study argues that foundation rituals describe a “culture of building” in ancient Greece, that is, they reveal ancient perceptions about building and builders by reflecting the cultic responses these perceptions elicited. In investigating these important rites, this dissertation offers new insight into the process of constructing sacred architecture and the role it played in Greek society. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have been the lucky recipient of various kinds of support from many individuals and institutions. Their generosity has made the development of this project an enriching final stage of my graduate studies, and to all I give my heartfelt thanks. It is difficult to express the many ways in which this dissertation has profited from Robin Rhodes, who first introduced me to Greek art and archaeology as an undergraduate at the University of Notre Dame. My experiences as his student and as a member of his 7th-Century Temple Project at Corinth inspired the direction of my graduate studies and this dissertation. I continue to draw upon his guidance, his friendship, and his infectious love of all things Greek with affection and gratitude. I also thank the rest of the talented “block and tile” crew and associates in Corinth, especially Phil Sapirstein, Nick Rynearson, Alexis Belis, Ed Deegan, Celeste Lovette Guichard, Chris Stackowitz, the Kratz family, and the staff of the American School of Classical Studies Corinth Excavations. I would like to thank Mary Sturgeon, whose path I also happily crossed in ancient Corinth and at the University of North Carolina. Professor Sturgeon has been for me an interminable source of knowledge and support both academically and personally, and I can think of no one who has delighted in my successes more than she. In addition to the benefit of her distinguished scholarship and strong leadership, one of her many gifts to me was the use of her lovely little apartment in Athens which I called home for two years; a part of me still does. Many thanks are also due to my advisor Donald Haggis, whose ideas, insights, and genuine enthusiasm have inspired my work in many ways. For his unwavering dedication to my cause and for the perfectly balanced direction of this dissertation I am deeply grateful. I would also like to thank him, Margaret Mook, and the rest of the expert staff of the Azoria Project for the opportunity to have learned the nuts and bolts of archaeological investigation with them. I feel honored to have worked with each of these and other distinguished scholars at the University of North Carolina, especially Jaroslav Folda, G. Kenneth Sams, and Gerhard Koeppel. I know that any competence I may have acquired in my field is the direct result of the guidance and encouragement I’ve received from each of them. Support for my research in Greece and America has come from several fellowships and grants generously bestowed by the University of North Carolina, the Fulbright Foundation, the American Institute of Archaeology, and the American School of Classical Studies at Athens. For my time spent at the American School I thank in v particular Director Stephen Tracy and Mellon Professor James Sickinger. I can think of no other institution so tirelessly dedicated to the development of young scholars and am profoundly grateful for the exceptional opportunities for travel, research, excavation, and fellowship the School has afforded me. Many thanks are due to the Art Department at the University of North Carolina for much practical support. I also thank the excellent and charitable staff of several libraries, including the Joseph C. Sloane Art Library at UNC, the Blegen Library of the American School at Athens, and the staff at the Stephen Chan Library at the Institute of Fine Arts in New York. Personal thanks go to my parents, who always encouraged me along this path, even knowing it would take me far away from home. While in Athens and Chapel Hill, I was fortunate to have been surrounded by many supportive and engaging friends and colleagues, especially Andrea Bottaro, Maureen O’Brien, Jessica Sponsler, Benjamin Harvey, Melissa Eaby, Sheri Pak, and Douglas Park. Finally, I thank my husband James Hunt, my sine quo non, upon whose love and support this and all my endeavors are built. This dissertation was begun shortly before we met as students at the American School in Athens; it was completed soon after the birth of our first son, Vincent. The present work therefore chronicles, in a sense, the foundation of our new family and is the more enriched for it. Me agãph, June 15, 2006 vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Illustrations............................................................................................................ xii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................1 Foundation Rituals in the Ancient Mediterranean: Phenomenology..........................................................................................1 The Greek Evidence.....................................................................................5 Goals, Scope, and Organization...................................................................6 History of Scholarship: Literary Evidence ..................................................9 History of Scholarship: Archaeological Evidence.....................................14 Problems in Identification: Modern Terminology .....................................16 Problems in Identification: Archaeology...................................................18 II EAST GREEK TYPE FOUNDATION DEPOSITS ..........................................21 Ephesus, Temple of Artemis “Earlier Basis” Deposit ...............................22 ‘Pot Hoard’ Deposit .......................................................................35 Sardis, Temple of Artemis .........................................................................38 Priene, Temple of Athena Polias ...............................................................41 Perachora, Temple of Hera ........................................................................44 Kastabos, Temple of Hemithea..................................................................45 vii Xanthos, Letöon, Temple of Leto..............................................................46 Delos, Temple of Artemis (Temple E) ......................................................47
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Department Town Address Postcode Telephone Etoloakarnania Agrinio
    Department Town Address Postcode Telephone Etoloakarnania Agrinio 1, Eirinis square, Dimitrakaki street 301 00 2641046346 Etoloakarnania Mesologgi 45, Charilaou Trikoupi street 302 00 2631022487 Etoloakarnania Nafpaktos 1, Athinon street 303 00 2634038210 Etoloakarnania Amfilohia Vasileos Karapanou street 305 00 2642023302 Argolida Argos 12, Danaou street 212 00 2751069042 Argolida Nafplio 35, Argous street 211 00 2752096478 Argolida Porto Heli Porto Heli Argolidas 210 61 2754052102 Arkardia Megalopoli 15, Kolokotroni street 222 00 2791021131 Arkardia Tripoli 48, Ethinikis Antistaseos street 221 00 2710243770 Arta Arta 129, Skoufa street 471 00 2681077020 Attica Athens 316, Acharnon street & 26 Atlantos street 112 52 2102930333 Attica Agios Dimitrios 54, Agiou Dimitriou street 173 41 2109753953 Attica Agios Dimitrios 276, Vouliagmenis avenue 173 43 2109818908 Attica Agios Dimitrios 9 - 11, Agiou Dimitriou street 173 43 2109764322 Attica Agia Paraskevi 429, Mesogeion avenue 153 43 2106006242 Attica Athens - Piraeus 153, Piraeus Avenue 118 53 2104815333 Attica Athens - Aristeidou 1, Aristeidou street 105 59 2103227778 Attica Athens 79, Alexandras avenue 114 74 2106426650 Attica Athens - Plateia Viktorias 2, Victoria square 104 34 2108220800 Attica Athens - Stadiou 7, Stadiou street 105 62 2103316892 Attica Egaleo 266, Iera Odos street 122 42 2105316671 126, Vasilissis Sofias street & 2, Feidippidou Attica Abelokipoi street 115 27 2106461200 Attica Amfiali 32, Pavlou Fissa street 187 57 2104324300 Attica Palaio Faliro 82, Amfitheas avenue
    [Show full text]
  • This Pdf Is a Digital Offprint of Your Contribution in E. Alram-Stern, F
    This pdf is a digital offprint of your contribution in E. Alram-Stern, F. Blakolmer, S. Deger-Jalkotzy, R. Laffineur & J. Weilhartner (eds), Metaphysis. Ritual, Myth and Symbolism in the Aegean Bronze Age (Aegaeum 39), ISBN 978-90-429-3366-8. The copyright on this publication belongs to Peeters Publishers. As author you are licensed to make printed copies of the pdf or to send the unaltered pdf file to up to 50 relations. You may not publish this pdf on the World Wide Web – including websites such as academia.edu and open-access repositories – until three years after publication. Please ensure that anyone receiving an offprint from you observes these rules as well. If you wish to publish your article immediately on open- access sites, please contact the publisher with regard to the payment of the article processing fee. For queries about offprints, copyright and republication of your article, please contact the publisher via [email protected] AEGAEUM 39 Annales liégeoises et PASPiennes d’archéologie égéenne METAPHYSIS RITUAL, MYTH AND SYMBOLISM IN THE AEGEAN BRONZE AGE Proceedings of the 15th International Aegean Conference, Vienna, Institute for Oriental and European Archaeology, Aegean and Anatolia Department, Austrian Academy of Sciences and Institute of Classical Archaeology, University of Vienna, 22-25 April 2014 Edited by Eva ALRAM-STERN, Fritz BLAKOLMER, Sigrid DEGER-JALKOTZY, Robert LAFFINEUR and Jörg WEILHARTNER PEETERS LEUVEN - LIEGE 2016 98738_Aegaeum 39 vwk.indd 1 25/03/16 08:06 CONTENTS Obituaries ix Preface xiii Abbreviations xv KEYNOTE LECTURE Nanno MARINATOS Myth, Ritual, Symbolism and the Solar Goddess in Thera 3 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Demetrius Poliorcetes and the Hellenic League
    DEMETRIUSPOLIORCETES AND THE HELLENIC LEAGUE (PLATE 33) 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND D JURING the six years, 307/6-302/1 B.C., issues were raised and settled which shaped the course of western history for a long time to come. The epoch was alike critical for Athens, Hellas, and the Macedonians. The Macedonians faced squarely during this period the decision whether their world was to be one world or an aggregate of separate kingdoms with conflicting interests, and ill-defined boundaries, preserved by a precarious balance of power and incapable of common action against uprisings of Greek and oriental subjects and the plundering appetites of surrounding barbarians. The champion of unity was King Antigonus the One- Eyed, and his chief lieutenant his brilliant but unstatesmanlike son, King Demetrius the Taker of Cities, a master of siege operations and of naval construction and tactics, more skilled in organizing the land-instruments of warfare than in using them on the battle field. The final campaign between the champions of Macedonian unity and disunity opened in 307 with the liberation of Athens by Demetrius and ended in 301 B.C. with the Battle of the Kings, when Antigonus died in a hail of javelins and Demetrius' cavalry failed to penetrate a corps of 500 Indian elephants in a vain effort to rescue hinm. Of his four adversaries King Lysimachus and King Kassander left no successors; the other two, Kings Ptolemy of Egypt and Seleucus of Syria, were more fortunate, and they and Demetrius' able son, Antigonus Gonatas, planted the three dynasties with whom the Romans dealt and whom they successively destroyed in wars spread over 44 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings & Events of the Babylonian, Persian and Greek Dynasties
    KINGS AND EVENTS OF THE BABYLONIAN, PERSIAN, AND GREEK DYNASTIES 612 B.C. Nineveh falls to neo-Babylonian army (Nebuchadnezzar) 608 Pharaoh Necho II marched to Carchemesh to halt expansion of neo-Babylonian power Josiah, King of Judah, tries to stop him Death of Josiah and assumption of throne by his son, Jehoahaz Jehoiakim, another son of Josiah, replaced Jehoahaz on the authority of Pharaoh Necho II within 3 months Palestine and Syria under Egyptian rule Josiah’s reforms dissipate 605 Nabopolassar sends troops to fight remaining Assyrian army and the Egyptians at Carchemesh Nebuchadnezzar chased them all the way to the plains of Palestine Nebuchadnezzar got word of the death of his father (Nabopolassar) so he returned to Babylon to receive the crown On the way back he takes Daniel and other members of the royal family into exile 605 - 538 Babylon in control of Palestine, 597; 10,000 exiled to Babylon 586 Jerusalem and the temple destroyed and large deportation 582 Because Jewish guerilla fighters killed Gedaliah another last large deportation occurred SUCCESSORS OF NEBUCHADNEZZAR 562 - 560 Evil-Merodach released Jehoiakim (true Messianic line) from custody 560 - 556 Neriglissar 556 Labaski-Marduk reigned 556 - 539 Nabonidus: Spent most of the time building a temple to the mood god, Sin. This earned enmity of the priests of Marduk. Spent the rest of his time trying to put down revolts and stabilize the kingdom. He moved to Tema and left the affairs of state to his son, Belshazzar Belshazzar: Spent most of his time trying to restore order. Babylonia’s great threat was Media.
    [Show full text]
  • General Introduction Hesiod and His Poems
    General Introduction Hesiod and His Poems The Theogony is one of the most important mythical texts to survive from antiquity, and I devote the first section of this translation to it. It tells of the creation of the present world order under the rule of almighty Zeus. The Works and Days, in the second section, describes a bitter dispute between Hesiod and his brother over the disposition of their father’s property, a theme that allows Hesiod to range widely over issues of right and wrong. The Shield of Herakles, whose centerpiece is a long description of a work of art, is not by Hesiod, at least most of it, but it was always attributed to him in antiquity. It is Hesiodic in style and has always formed part of the Hesiodic corpus. It makes up the third section of this book. The influence of Homer’s poems on Greek and later culture is inestima- ble, but Homer never tells us who he is; he stands behind his poems, invisi- ble, all-knowing. His probable contemporary Hesiod, by contrast, is the first self-conscious author in Western literature. Hesiod tells us something about himself in his poetry. His name seems to mean “he who takes pleasure in a journey” (for what it is worth) but in the Works and Days he may play with the meaning of “he who sends forth song.” As with all names—for example, Homer, meaning “hostage,” or Herodotus, meaning “a warrior’s gift”—the name of a poet may have nothing to do with his actual career.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIL Multikey Lesson Plan LESSON PLAN
    CLIL MultiKey lesson plan LESSON PLAN Subject: Art History Topic: The Athenian acropolis Students' age: 14-15 Language level: B1 Time: 2 hours Content aims: Art History (and a bit of History) on ancient Greece and the poleis. To describe an artistic element of an ancient city To understand the political role of Art and Religion in Ancient Greece Language aims: - Listening activity - Learn and use new vocabulary - Knowledge of technical art and history vocabulary Pre-requisites: - Geographical and cartographical skill - Knowledge of Greek history from the Persian wars to Pericles; - The role of the city in the world Materials: - Personal computer - handouts Procedure steps: Teacher starts explaining the geographical asset: where is Greece in Europe, where is Athens, arriving to the map that shows the metropolis in the details. Then after a short brainstorming activity about the poleis, (birth and main characters) arrives to the substantial continuity of the word polis in English. Which are the words deriving from polis? acropolis, necropolis, metropolis, metropolitan; megalopolis, cosmopolitan; Politics Policy Police T. shows map and asks: 1 CLIL MultiKey lesson plan Where are the acropolis and the necropolis of Athens? Then t. shows a video, inviting students to understanding the following items: - Which was the Athenian political role? - Which politicians are quoted? Why? When do they live? - Which are the most relevant urban changes for Athens? Finally teacher invites students to complete the handout 2 CLIL MultiKey lesson plan HANDOUT a) Sites references: Image coins: http://www.ancientresource.com/lots/greek/coins_athens.html http://blogs-images.forbes.com/stephenpope/files/2011/05/300px-1_euro_coin_Gr_serie_1.png Athena's birth: http://galeri7.uludagsozluk.com/282/zeus_454246.png b) vvideos's transcripts 1) https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/ancient-art-civilizations/greek-art/classical/v/parthenon Transcript Voiceover: We're looking at the Parthenon.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unrecorded Attic Colony in Euboea?
    The Classical Review http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR Additional services for The Classical Review: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here An Unrecorded Attic Colony in Euboea? Lewis R. Farnell The Classical Review / Volume 20 / Issue 01 / February 1906, pp 27 - 31 DOI: 10.1017/S0009840X00993557, Published online: 27 October 2009 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0009840X00993557 How to cite this article: Lewis R. Farnell (1906). An Unrecorded Attic Colony in Euboea?. The Classical Review, 20, pp 27-31 doi:10.1017/S0009840X00993557 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/CAR, IP address: 147.188.128.74 on 23 Mar 2015 THE CLASSICAL REVIEW. 27 extant line of the 'AOrprauav iro\vrtia and in meaning fourteen chapters earlier. (2) As Plutarch, V. Solonis c. 12, referring to the to the meaning of apia-rivSrjv with such a same event, viz. the constitution of the court verb as alpeio-dai in the undoubted writings which tried the Alcmaeonidae. I do not of Aristotle there can be no shadow of doubt. challenge Mr. Greenidge's statement that If we turn to Politics ii. 11, 1273 a 23, 26, when applied to these early constitutions the same mode of election which in the one api<TTiv8r)v may practically and technicallyline is designated apurrivSrjv is in the other signify 'by right of birth,' but I wish to designated Kar' aperrp/. At Carthage oi point out two considerations which in my jj-ovov api<TTiv8rpr d\\a Kai irXovrivSr}V olovrai judgment nullify completely the argument Selv aiptiorOai TOVS ap^ovras (1273 a 23 sq.) or, from Polybius.
    [Show full text]
  • The Annual of the British School at Athens Excavations At
    The Annual of the British School at Athens http://journals.cambridge.org/ATH Additional services for The Annual of the British School at Athens: Email alerts: Click here Subscriptions: Click here Commercial reprints: Click here Terms of use : Click here Excavations at Palaikastro. II: § 10.—Hagios Nikolaos Marcus Niebuhr Tod The Annual of the British School at Athens / Volume 9 / November 1903, pp 336 - 343 DOI: 10.1017/S0068245400007796, Published online: 18 October 2013 Link to this article: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0068245400007796 How to cite this article: Marcus Niebuhr Tod (1903). Excavations at Palaikastro. II: § 10.—Hagios Nikolaos. The Annual of the British School at Athens, 9, pp 336-343 doi:10.1017/S0068245400007796 Request Permissions : Click here Downloaded from http://journals.cambridge.org/ATH, IP address: 128.122.253.212 on 13 Apr 2015 EXCAVATIONS AT PALAIKASTRO. II. § 10.—HAGIOS NIKOLAOS. ON March 31st, 1903, and the three following days I conducted a trial excavation at a site situated at about an hour's distance from Rous- solakkos, and known as Hagios Nikolaos from a small church of that name. During the first three days I employed ten men, on the fourth only two. The most prominent feature of the landscape is the height called Modhi (1776 ft.). From the foot of this there runs almost due east a deep valley with a river-bed, which, although quite dry at the time when I saw it, must sometimes carry off a considerable volume of water from the surrounding hills. The valley is at first narrow and its sides very steep, but a little way above the chapel it broadens out considerably : although the left bank is steep and in places almost precipitous, the right side rises in a gentle slope, forming a series of terraces which are under cultivation and afford a good harvest in spite of the stony character of the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Greece Around the Museum Gallery Trail
    Ancient Greece around the Museum Gallery Trail USE this trail to fi nd Ancient Greek objects around the museum when the main Greek galleries are booked by another group. This trail does NOT include Greece (16), Aegean World (20), Money (7) or the Cast Gallery (14). GO OUTSIDE THE BUILDING TO THE FORECOURT The Ashmolean was built in 1845 in the style of an Ancient Greek temple. LOOK closely at the building and fi nd these elements of Greek archtictecture. DRAW a line between the labels and the pictures below. Pediment Classical column Key pattern Capital Mythical beast Apollo Apollo fact In the Ancient Greek world, Apollo was the god of music, poetry and the arts. He was the son of Zeus, king of all the gods. RE-ENTER THE MUSEUM AND FIND OUT MORE Ancient Greece around the Museum Gallery Trail GO TO: Ground fl oor, Gallery 21: Greek and Roman Sculpture MEET Athena a famous Greek goddess. Goddess Fact This is Athena the patron goddess of Athens. She is also the goddess of wisdom and warfare. She always wears a helmet and the ‘mask of Medusa’ on her breast plate. LOOK closely at Athena’s breast plate. It shows the face of the gorgon Medusa with snakes for hair. Greek myths tell us that if you looked Medusa in the eye you would be turned to stone! DRAW Medusa’s face onto this picture of the breastplate. In this gallery HUNT for: A giant head of the God Apollo A throne with Griffi n wings on the side Griffi n Information The Greek hero Herakles fi ghting A griffi n is a mythical creature with the with a lion.
    [Show full text]
  • New Approaches to the Temple of Zeus at Olympia
    New Approaches to the Temple of Zeus at Olympia New Approaches to the Temple of Zeus at Olympia Proceedings of the First Olympia-Seminar 8th-10th May 2014 Edited by András Patay-Horváth New Approaches to the Temple of Zeus at Olympia: Proceedings of the First Olympia-Seminar 8th-10th May 2014 Edited by András Patay-Horváth This book first published 2015 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2015 by András Patay-Horváth and contributors All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-7816-2 ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-7816-6 FOR J. GY. SZILÁGYI TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ......................................................................................................... x List of Illustrations and Tables .................................................................. xii Abbreviations ............................................................................................ xx Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Adopting a New Approach to the Temple and its Sculptural Decoration András Patay-Horváth Part I: Architecture Chapter One ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Reporting Cycle 1, Section I
    Application of the World Heritage Convention by the States Parties City of Rhodes (1988); Mystras, (1989); GREECE Archaeological Site of Olympia (1989); Delos (1990); Monasteries of Daphni, Hossios Luckas and Nea Moni of Chios (1990); Pythagoreion and I.01. Introduction Heraion of Samos (1992); Archaeological Site of Vergina (1996); Archaeological Sites of Mycenae Year of adhesion to the Convention: 1981 and Tiryns (1999); The Historic Centre (Chorá) with the Monastery of Saint John “the Theologian” and the Cave of Apocalypse on the Island of Organisation(s) or institution(s) responsible for Pátmos (1999) preparation of report • 2 mixed (cultural and natural) sites: Mount Athos (1988); Meteora (1988) • Ministry of Culture, General Directorate of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage Benefits of inscription I.02. Identification of Cultural and Natural • Honour/prestige, enhanced protection and Properties conservation of the site, working in partnership, lobbying and political pressure, endangered site protected Status of national inventories • The coordinating unit of national cultural heritage I.05. General Policy and Legislation for the inventories is the Directorate of the Archive of Protection, Conservation and Monuments and Publications/ Ministry of Culture Presentation of the Cultural and Natural • Natural Heritage has no central inventory because Heritage responsibility is divided between several ministries • Scientific List of Protected Areas related to the NATURA 2000 requirements Specific legislations • Cultural environment: Law ‘On the protection of I.03. The Tentative List Antiquities and Cultural Heritage in General’. The ‘General Building Construction Regulation’ focuses • Original Tentative List submitted in 1985 specially on the protection of listed architectural • Revision submitted in 2003 heritage and living settlements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parthenon, Part I: from Its Multiple Beginnings to 432 BCE"
    1 THE FORTNIGHTLY CLUB Of REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA Founded 24 January 1895 Meeting Number 1856 March 13, 2014 "The Parthenon, Part I: From its Multiple Beginnings to 432 BCE" Bill McDonald Assembly Room, A. K. Smiley Public Library 2 [1] (Numbers in red catalog the slides) Fortnightly Talk #6 From Herekleides of Crete, in the 3rd century BCE: “The most beautiful things in the world are there [in Athens}… The sumptuous temple of Athena stands out, and is well worth a look. It is called the Parthenon and it is on the hill above the theatre. It makes a tremendous impression on visitors.” Reporter: Did you visit the Parthenon during your trip to Greece?” Shaq: “I can’t really remember the names of the clubs we went to.” Architects, aesthetes, grand tour-takers from England, France and Germany all came to Rome in the 3rd quarter of the 18th century, where they developed on uneven evidence a newly austere view of the classical world that in turn produced the Greek revival across northern Europe and in America. Johann Joachim Winckelmann (1717 – 1768) [2], a self-made scholar of ancient Greek language and texts, was their unofficial high priest. In 1755 Winckelmann arrived for the first time in Rome, where thanks not only to his brilliant publications but also to a recent and, shall we say, a timely conversion to Catholicism, he was admitted by papal authorities to the Vatican galleries and storerooms (his friend Goethe said that Winckelmann was really “a pagan”). His contemporaries in Rome saw Greek civilization as a primitive source for Roman art, and had never troubled to isolate Greek art from its successor; Winckelmann reversed that, making Greek art and 3 architecture, especially sculpture—and especially of the young male form that he especially admired—not only distinctive in its own right but the font of the greatest Western art.
    [Show full text]