Cleaning up Hudson River Pcbs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cleaning up Hudson River Pcbs Background The Decision to Dredge: For 30 years, ending in the late 1970s, the PCBs in the sediment are not safely buried. General Electric Company (GE) discharged as River sediment is continually redistributed across much as 1.3 million pounds of polychlorinated the bottom by erosion and river flows. This biphenyls (PCBs) into the Hudson River from its movement exposes PCB-contaminated sediment, capacitor manufacturing plants in Hudson Falls making it available to fish. PCBs degrade and Fort Edward, New York. naturally over time, but the process, called Cleaning Up natural dechlorination, does not make them harmless. EPA considers all PCBs, regardless of Hudson River their level of chlorination, to be hazardous. PCBs are harmful to people's health. PCBs PCBs cause cancer in laboratory animals, are considered a probable cause of cancer in people, and can trigger reproductive and Spring 2011 immunological health affects and low birth weight. General Electric Hudson Falls Plant and Bakers Falls In February 2002, the federal government ordered GE to conduct targeted environmental dredging of PCB-contaminated sediment in a 40- mile stretch of the Upper Hudson. After many years of study, dredging has begun. The ecological and economic benefits of cleaning up the river will be enjoyed for generations to come. What are PCBs? PCBs in the river sediment also affect fish • PCBs were 3’ 2’ 2’ 3’ widely used as a and wildlife. fire preventive 4’ 4’ Removal of PCB-contaminated sediments will and insulator in reduce PCB levels in fish, and result in a the manufacture 5’ 6’ 6’ 5’ reduction in the risk to people's health, wildlife, of transformers Structure of Polychlorinated and the environment. and capacitors. Biphenyl (PCB) Molecule • The chemical stability of PCBs, which made them valuable for industrial uses, also makes them hazardous to the environment. Hudson River P C B s S U P E R F U N D S I T E Background The Decision to Dredge: For 30 years, ending in the late 1970s, the PCBs in the sediment are not safely buried. General Electric Company (GE) discharged as River sediment is continually redistributed across much as 1.3 million pounds of polychlorinated the bottom by erosion and river flows. This biphenyls (PCBs) into the Hudson River from its movement exposes PCB-contaminated sediment, capacitor manufacturing plants in Hudson Falls making it available to fish. PCBs degrade and Fort Edward, New York. naturally over time, but the process, called natural dechlorination, does not make them harmless. EPA considers all PCBs, regardless of their level of chlorination, to be hazardous. PCBs are harmful to people's health. Eating fish from the Hudson can PCBs cause cancer in laboratory animals, are be dangerous. considered a probable cause of cancer in people, and can trigger reproductive and For more than 30 years, concerns about PCBs immunological health affects and low birth in Hudson River fish have prompted New York weight. State to issue health advisories that recommend limits on eating fish from the river. General Electric Hudson Falls Plant and Bakers Falls In February 2002, the federal government • Women of childbearing age and ordered GE to conduct targeted environmental children under 15 should not eat any dredging of PCB-contaminated sediment in a 40- fish from the Hudson River. mile stretch of the Upper Hudson. After many • Between Bakers Falls (in Hudson Falls) years of study, dredging has begun. The and the Federal Dam in Troy, ecological and economic benefits of cleaning up catch and release fishing only. the river will be enjoyed for generations to come. What are PCBs? To reduce your exposure to PCBs, follow state PCBs in the river sediment also affect fish fish consumption advisories available at • PCBs were 3’ 2’ 2’ 3’ and wildlife. www.health.ny.gov/environmental/ widely used as a outdoors/fish/fish.htm fire preventive 4’ 4’ Removal of PCB-contaminated sediments will and insulator in reduce PCB levels in fish, and result in a For more information, call the NYS Dept. of the manufacture 5’ 6’ 6’ 5’ reduction in the risk to people's health, wildlife, Health at 1-800-458-1158. of transformers Structure of Polychlorinated and the environment. and capacitors. Biphenyl (PCB) Molecule • The chemical stability of PCBs, which made them valuable for industrial uses, also makes them hazardous to the environment. Dredging the Hudson River Dredging the Hudson River Dredging Project Area Map Glen Falls The cleanup of the Hudson River will occur in two phases. Phase 1 (the first year of the Project) was Hudson Falls Champlain WARREN Canal conducted by General Electric Co (GE) with oversight by EPA from May to November 2009. During COUNTY Rogers Island Dewatering Facility this phase, approximately 283,000 cubic yards was removed from a six-mile stretch of the Upper Fernwood Fort Edward Hudson River near Fort Edward, New York. After an extensive evaluation by an independent panel of Former Fort scientists and input from a broad range of stakeholders, EPA developed plans for the second part of Edward Dam Lock 7 Upper the cleanup. Phase 2 will be conducted at full production to remove the remainder of the Hudson River contaminated river sediments; Phase 2 targets the removal of approximately 350,000 cubic yards of Moses Kill sediment per year. Gansevoort Hudson River PCBs Thompson Island Dam It is estimated that the second phase of the project will take five to seven Superfund Site Map Thompson Island Fort Miller Dam (far-field station) Hudson Lock 6 years to complete. Extensive monitoring will be done during both phases to Falls UpperUpper ensure that the dredging operations are safe and that public health is Northumberland Dam HudsonHudson RiverRiver Lock 5 protected at all times. Batten Kill Saratoga Schuylerville Springs Schuylerville (far-field station) Greenwich Sediment Removal, Fast Facts Merchanicville Saratoga Springs Fish Creek Scotia Cohoes Processing, and Disposal Schenectady • Dredge areas were identified Watervliet Troy Mechanical dredges are being used to remove using the results of a multi- Albany year sediment sampling Rensselaer SARATOGA PCB-contaminated sediment from the river bottom. Castleton-on- COUNTY WASHINGTON program conducted by GE Hudson COUNTY Dredges mounted on deck barges use clamshell Hudson River that began in 2002 and buckets to place dredged sediment into barges. generated more than 50,000 Lower Tugboats then push the filled barges to a Hudson River sediment samples taken from Hudson dewatering and sediment-processing facility located the bottom of the Upper on the Champlain Canal in Fort Edward, NY. Once Hudson River. Some there, debris is removed and sediment is additional sediment sampling Lock 4 Stillwater Stillwater Stillwater mechanically dewatered. The water is treated on- will occur as the project Kingston Dam continues. Hudson River site before being returned to the Champlain Canal. Lock 3 Hoosic River The dewatered sediment and debris are loaded • Dredging occurs 24 hours a Valley Falls onto railcars for transport to a secure, PCB- day, six days a week, when Poughkeepsie Lock 2 approved landfill. the Champlain Canal is open Walden Clifton Park RENSSELAER Beacon 40 River (May to November). Newburgh COUNTY Miles Lock 1 This is what dredge • In total, about 490 acres of Halfmoon Monroe operators see and what the Upper Hudson River will Peekskill Mohawk allows them to identify River be dredged. Haverstraw Phase 1 Dredging Area where to dig. The depth Waterford Waterford Phase 2 Dredging Area and locations are The Hudson River PCBs Site (far-field Water Monitoring station) determined by satellites. encompasses a nearly 200-mile Cohoes Location The computer software stretch of the Hudson River in To Albany and Poughkeepsie Federal Dam and being used is specific to eastern NY from Hudson Falls, New York (far-field station) Troy Lock the Hudson River NY to the Battery in NYC. City dredging project. Dredging will occur in the upper 40-mile section of the Superfund Site, from Fort Edward, NY, south to the Federal Dam in Troy. Performanceerformance Standards Standards Engineering Performance Standards In-River Water Monitoring Project Safety Strict Engineering An extensive water quality The Phase 2 Remedial Action Community Health Performance monitoring program is in and Safety Plan (CHASP) addresses potential Standards have place at upstream, near- health and safety issues for the public associated been developed field, mid-field, and far- with the dredging project. to minimize field stations. Components of the Plan: resuspension of Near-field monitoring: PCBs during • Identifies potential hazards to the community 300 meters downstream of dredging. dredging. The during work in-river, on-shore, and at the processing facility resuspension Mid-field monitoring: approximately 1 to 2 miles standard created downstream of dredging. • Discusses the control of potential hazards for the project was specifically designed to: Far-field monitoring: greater than 2 miles • Outlines the measures that are being taken downstream of dredging. (See map for far-field to protect drinking water supplies • Protect drinking water intakes downriver of the dredging operations, and monitoring locations) • Includes emergency response plans for spills/releases/accidents • Limit the downriver transport of PCB- Water Quality Protection • Discusses the community notification process contaminated dredged material. EPA is committed to making sure that the project is • Identifies project safety personnel & The Resuspension Standard completed in a way that is protective of human emergency contacts health and the environment. • Outlines the complaint-resolution process The performance standard for dredging sets a • EPA has provided an alternate water supply to For the CHASP and other project-related resuspension level of 500 parts per trillion (ppt) total the towns who draw their water from the river. PCBs- the EPA drinking water standard under the documents go to: www.epa.gov/hudson or • If certain criteria for the water quality standard for www.hudsondredgingdata.com Safe Drinking Water Act.
Recommended publications
  • Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications
    Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Waterbody Type Segment ID Waterbody Index Number (WIN) Streams 0202-0047 Pa-63-30 Streams 0202-0048 Pa-63-33 Streams 0801-0419 Ont 19- 94- 1-P922- Streams 0201-0034 Pa-53-21 Streams 0801-0422 Ont 19- 98 Streams 0801-0423 Ont 19- 99 Streams 0801-0424 Ont 19-103 Streams 0801-0429 Ont 19-104- 3 Streams 0801-0442 Ont 19-105 thru 112 Streams 0801-0445 Ont 19-114 Streams 0801-0447 Ont 19-119 Streams 0801-0452 Ont 19-P1007- Streams 1001-0017 C- 86 Streams 1001-0018 C- 5 thru 13 Streams 1001-0019 C- 14 Streams 1001-0022 C- 57 thru 95 (selected) Streams 1001-0023 C- 73 Streams 1001-0024 C- 80 Streams 1001-0025 C- 86-3 Streams 1001-0026 C- 86-5 Page 1 of 464 09/28/2021 Waterbody Classifications, Streams Based on Waterbody Classifications Name Description Clear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Mud Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to Long Lake total length of all tribs to lake Little Valley Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Elkdale Kents Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Crystal Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Forestport Alder Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Bear Creek and tribs entire stream and tribs Minor Tribs to Kayuta Lake total length of select tribs to the lake Little Black Creek, Upper, and tribs stream and tribs, above Wheelertown Twin Lakes Stream and tribs entire stream and tribs Tribs to North Lake total length of all tribs to lake Mill Brook and minor tribs entire stream and selected tribs Riley Brook
    [Show full text]
  • Cleaning up Hudson River Pcbs Project Brochure
    Thursday,May19,201111:50:38AM G:\002200-002299\002260\HR07_02_03\Graphics\Trifold\CleaningupHudsonTrifold-April2011.cdr R O P T E L C A T T fEngineers of I N O CsSPRUDSITE SITE SUPERFUND SUPERFUND PCBs PCBs ® E N SAm Corps Army US M A Hudson Hudson River River N G O E R I N V C N Y E U S N E I T T E A D T S 020H0.20-laigu usnTrifold.cdr-4/18/11-GRA Hudson up 002260.HR07.02.03-Cleaning 58 9-07 r olfe 88 596-3655 (888) toll-free or, 792-4087, (518) rdigifrainpoeline: phone information dredging rjc,cl eea lcrcs24-hour Electric's General call project, oakqetoso oc ocrsaotthe about concerns voice or questions ask To or yappointment. by hours rdy :0am o43 .. ihevening with p.m., 4:30 to a.m. 8:00 Friday, h il fiehusaeMna through Monday are hours Office Field The [email protected] 58 4-39o 86 1-40Toll-Free 615-6490 (866) or 747-4389 (518) usnFls Y12839 NY Falls, Hudson 2 oe anStreet Main Lower 421 eilpooo h usnRvradisfloodplain its and River Hudson the of photo Aerial usnRvrFedOffice Field River Hudson Coordinator aiaRomanowski, Larisa omnt Involvement Community Floodplain P Contact: EPA River pig2011 Spring www.epa.gov/hudson Floodplain fiea h drs eo rlgo to on log or below address the at Office ii,cl,o rt oteHdo ie Field River Hudson the to write or call, Visit, Source: Microsoft Corporation, 2009 PCBs o oeInformation: More For usnRiver Hudson r needed. are odtriei nei lau measures cleanup interim if determine to laigUp Cleaning sdt upeetacmrhniestudy comprehensive a supplement to used usn h eut ftesmln ilbe will sampling the of results The Hudson.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Ddt, Chlordane, and Total Pcb's in Bed Sediments in the Hudson River Basin
    NYES&E, Vol. 3, No. 1, Spring 1997 DISTRIBUTION OF DDT, CHLORDANE, AND TOTAL PCB'S IN BED SEDIMENTS IN THE HUDSON RIVER BASIN Patrick J. Phillips1, Karen Riva-Murray1, Hannah M. Hollister2, and Elizabeth A. Flanary1. 1U.S. Geological Survey, 425 Jordan Road, Troy NY 12180. 2Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Troy NY 12180. Abstract Data from streambed-sediment samples collected from 45 sites in the Hudson River Basin and analyzed for organochlorine compounds indicate that residues of DDT, chlordane, and PCB's can be detected even though use of these compounds has been banned for 10 or more years. Previous studies indicate that DDT and chlordane were widely used in a variety of land use settings in the basin, whereas PCB's were introduced into Hudson and Mohawk Rivers mostly as point discharges at a few locations. Detection limits for DDT and chlordane residues in this study were generally 1 µg/kg, and that for total PCB's was 50 µg/kg. Some form of DDT was detected in more than 60 percent of the samples, and some form of chlordane was found in about 30 percent; PCB's were found in about 33 percent of the samples. Median concentrations for p,p’- DDE (the DDT residue with the highest concentration) were highest in samples from sites representing urban areas (median concentration 5.3 µg/kg) and lower in samples from sites in large watersheds (1.25 µg/kg) and at sites in nonurban watersheds. (Urban watershed were defined as those with a population density of more than 60/km2; nonurban watersheds as those with a population density of less than 60/km2, and large watersheds as those encompassing more than 1,300 km2.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection
    Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection A FOB THE TOURIST J1ND TRAVELLER, ALONO THE LINE OF THE CANALS, AND TUB INTERIOli COMMERCE OF THE STATE OF NEW-YORK. BT HORATIO GATES SPAFFORD, LL. IX AUTHOR OF THE GAZETTEER Of SKW-IOBK. JfEW-YOBK: PRIXTEB BY T. AND J. SWORDS, No. 99 Pearl-street. 1824. Prfee SO Ceats. Central Library of Rochester and Monroe County · Historic Monographs Collection Northern-District of New-York, In wit: BE it remembered, thut on the twelfth day of July, in the forty-ninth year of the Inde­ pendence of the United States of America, A. D 1824. Harutio G. Spajford, of the said District, hath deposited in this Office the title of a Book, the right whereof he claims as Author, in the word& following, to wit: **A Pocket Guide for the Tourist and Traveller, along the line of the Canals, and the interior Commerce of the State of New-York. By Horatio Gates Spaffor'dyLL.D. Author of the Gazetteer of Nete-York." In conformity to the Act of the Congress of the United States, entitled, " An Act for the Encouragement of Learn­ ing, !>y securing the Copies of Maps, Charts, and Books, to the Authors and Proprietors of such Copies, during the times therein mentioned;" and also to the Act, entitled " An Act, supplementary to an Act, entitled ' An Act for the Encou­ ragement of Learning, !>y securing the Copies of Maps, Charts, and Hooks, to the Authors and Proprietors of such Copies during the times therein mentioned,' and extending the Benefits thereof to the Arts of Designing, Engraving, and Etching Historical and other Prints." R.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington County, New York Data Book
    Washington County, New York Data Book 2008 Prepared by the Washington County Department of Planning & Community Development Comments, suggestions and corrections are welcomed and encouraged. Please contact the Department at (518) 746-2290 or [email protected] Table of Contents: Table of Contents: ....................................................................................................................................................................................... ii Profile: ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Location & General Description .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Municipality ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 Physical Description ............................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Quality of Life: ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Housing .................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in the Hudson River Basin New York and Adjacent States, 1992–95
    science for a changing world Water Quality in the Hudson River Basin New York and Adjacent States, 1992–95 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1165 A COORDINATED EFFORT Coordination among agencies and organizations is an integral part of the NAWQA Program. We thank the following individuals and organizations who contributed data, knowledge, time, and expertise. Steven Anderson, Montgomery American Museum of Natural History New York Sea Grant County Soil Conservation District Cornell University New York State Canal Corporation Robert W. Bode, Margaret A. Novak, Cornell University Cooperative New York State Department of Environ- and Lawrence E. Abele, New York Extension mental Conservation State Department of Environmen- Freshwater Institute at Rensselaer New York State Department of Health tal Conservation (NYSDEC) Divi- Polytechnic Institute New York State Department of State sion of Water, Stream General Electric Company Coastal Resource Management Biomonitoring Unit Hudsonia New York State Geological Survey Richard Bopp, Rensselaer Polytech- nic Institute, Department of Earth Hudson River-Black River Regulating New York State Museum and Environmental Sciences District Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Robert Crowe and other landowners Hudson River Foundation River Watch Network, Inc. who permitted access to stream Hudson River National Estuarine Simon’s Rock College and well sites on private property Research Reserve State University of New York at Albany Robert A. Daniels, New York State Hudson Valley Regional Council Suffolk County, N.Y. Museum, Biological Survey Institute of Ecosystem Studies Thatcher Research Associates, Inc. Larry Rosenmann, NYSDEC Divi- New York Botanical Garden The Nature Conservancy sion of Pesticides and Radiation New York City Department of Environ- U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality in the Hudson River Basin New York and Adjacent States, 1992–95
    science for a changing world Water Quality in the Hudson River Basin New York and Adjacent States, 1992–95 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1165 A COORDINATED EFFORT Coordination among agencies and organizations is an integral part of the NAWQA Program. We thank the following individuals and organizations who contributed data, knowledge, time, and expertise. Steven Anderson, Montgomery American Museum of Natural History New York Sea Grant County Soil Conservation District Cornell University New York State Canal Corporation Robert W. Bode, Margaret A. Novak, Cornell University Cooperative New York State Department of Environ- and Lawrence E. Abele, New York Extension mental Conservation State Department of Environmen- Freshwater Institute at Rensselaer New York State Department of Health tal Conservation (NYSDEC) Divi- Polytechnic Institute New York State Department of State sion of Water, Stream General Electric Company Coastal Resource Management Biomonitoring Unit Hudsonia New York State Geological Survey Richard Bopp, Rensselaer Polytech- nic Institute, Department of Earth Hudson River-Black River Regulating New York State Museum and Environmental Sciences District Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Robert Crowe and other landowners Hudson River Foundation River Watch Network, Inc. who permitted access to stream Hudson River National Estuarine Simon’s Rock College and well sites on private property Research Reserve State University of New York at Albany Robert A. Daniels, New York State Hudson Valley Regional Council Suffolk County, N.Y. Museum, Biological Survey Institute of Ecosystem Studies Thatcher Research Associates, Inc. Larry Rosenmann, NYSDEC Divi- New York Botanical Garden The Nature Conservancy sion of Pesticides and Radiation New York City Department of Environ- U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Pcbs in the Upper Hudson River Historical
    iVs * PCBs in the Upper Hudson River Volume 1 Historical Perspective and Model Overview Prepared for: General Electric Albany, New York Job Number: GENhud:131 May 1999 313460 Volume 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES.......................................................................... 1-1 1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION......................................................................................... 1-2 SECTION 2 PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS.................................................................. 2-1 2.1 GEOGRAPHIC FEATURES......................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 River Location......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 River Dimensions and Characteristics.....................................................................2-1 2.1.3 Drainage Basin Characteristics................................................................................2-3 2.2 CULTURAL FEATURES..............................................................................................2-6 2.2.1 Hydroelectric Power Generation..............................................................................2-7 2.2.2 Champ!ainCanal......................................................................................................2-8 2.2.3 Hydropower Sites Affecting PCBs in the Hudson River........................................
    [Show full text]
  • University Microfilms, a XEROX Company , Ann Arbor, Michigan REVISIONARY and POPULATION STUDIES in the AMERICAN
    71-27,513 LOWDEN, Richard Max, 1943- REV I SI ONARY AND POPULATION STUDIES IN THE AMERICAN AQUATIC PLANT GENUS PONTEDERIA L. The Ohio State University, Ph.D., 1971 Botany University Microfilms, A XEROX Company , Ann Arbor, Michigan REVISIONARY AND POPULATION STUDIES IN THE AMERICAN AQUATIC PLANT GENUS PONTEDERIA L- DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Richard Max Lowden* B,A., M.Sc. The Ohio State University 1971 Approved by Adviser Graduate Program in Botany To my Parents for their continued interest in Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have sincerest admiration for my industrious assistant, Rafaela Joaquin, my wife, for the countless hours she rendered to this research in the field and laboratory. The receipt of a Grant-In-Aid of Research from The Society of the Sigma Xi is acknowledged, which en­ abled me, while carrying out other research, to study populations in British Honduras during December 1969. I am most indebted to the Organization for Tropical Studies, Inc. (OTS) for an introduction to tropical Biology (Costa Rica, summer of 1968) and for granting an OTS Pilot Research Grant F 70-23 (The Ohio State University Research Foundation Project No. 3031-Al) to R. L. Stuckey (Faculty Adviser, Department of Botany, The Ohio State University) and myself (Principal Investigator) for aid in performing the necessary field research in Mexico and Central America during the summer of 1970. To the Graduate Committee of the Department of Botany and the Graduate School Fellowship Committee (The Ohio State University), I am most grateful for the University Dissertation Year Fellowship awarded to me for the completion of this investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Results of Spirit Leveling in New York
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED*STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, DIRECTOR BULLETIN 514= RESULTS OF SPIRIT LEVELING IN NEW YORK 1906 TO 1911, INCLUSIVE R. B. MARSHALL, CHIEF GEOGRAPHER WASPIINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1912 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.............................................................. 5 Cooperation............................ .............................. 5 Previous publication.................................................. 5 Corrections ............................................................ 5 Personnel............................................................. 7 Classification.......................................................... 7 Bench marks........................................................ 7 Datum............................................................... 8 Topographic maps...................................................... 8 Primary leveling........................................................... 12 Dannemora, Loon Lake, Lyou Mountain, and Santa Clara quadrangles (Clinton and Franklin counties)........................................ 12 Massena and Potsdam quadrangles (St. Lawrence County)................ 17 Antwerp, Canton, Hammond, and Ogdensburg quadrangles (Jefferson and St. Lawrence counties).............................................. 18 Big Moose, Carthage, Lowville, McKeever, Number Four, and Port Leyden quadrangles (Herkimer, Lewis, and Oneida counties)................. 23 Cooperstown, Hartwick, and New Berlin quadrangles (Chenango, Madison,
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Inland Passage
    THE NORTHERN INLAND PASSAGE 1 2 The Northern Inland Passage An Interpretive Guide to the Champlain Canal Region by LAKES TO LOCKS PASSAGE Crown Point, New York • Lakes to Locks Passage, Inc. • 2019 3 This guidebook would not have been possible © 2019 Lakes to Locks Passage, Inc. without the essential contributions of public Crown Point, New York historians, keepers of the region’s stories: Maggie Funded in part by a grant from the National Scenic Brand, Town of Easton; Sandy McReynolds, Byways Program and from the Alfred Z. Solomon Town of Greenwich; Charles Filkins, Town of Charitable Trust. Hoosick; Paul Loding, Village of Hudson Falls; Paul Loatman, City of Mechanicville; Georgia COVER ILLUSTRATION: Residence of Joseph Ball, Mike Bilekiewicz, and George Hodgson, H. Harris, Smith’s Basin, Washington Co., NY. Town of Northumberland; Sean Kelleher, Town of Unknown artist, ca 1875, courtesy of Washington Saratoga; Christina Kelly, Town of Schaghticoke; County Historical Association. Linda Palmieri and JoAnn Winchell, Town of Stillwater; Carol Greenough, Town of Whitehall; INSIDE COVERS: 1820 map of the Champlain Stana Iseman, Knickerbocker Mansion; Brad L. Canal from Lake Champlain to the Hudson River. Utter, Waterford Historical Museum & Cultural (New York State Archives) Center; Kay Tomasi, Washington County Historical HALF TITLE: Champlain Canal sidecut, Waterford. Association, Eileen Hannay, Rogers Island Visitor (Waterford Historical Museum) Center; Paul McCarty and Sandra Spaulding, Old Fort House, Fort Edward. In addition to historians, TITLE PAGE: New York Barge Canal Lock 2 and other residents were generous with their time triple lock of the old Champlain Canal. Waterford, and knowledge: geologists David De Simone and 1912.
    [Show full text]
  • NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021
    NY State Highway Bridge Data: August 31, 2021 Washington County Year Date BIN Built or of Last Poor Region County Municipality Location Feature Carried Feature Crossed Owner Replaced Inspectio Status n N 01 Washingto Argyle (Town) 3306560 1.9 MI WEST OF S ARGYLE HARPER ROAD MOSES KILL 30 - County 1942 05/03/2021 n N 01 Washingto Argyle (Town) 3306550 1.5 MI NE OF ARGYLE KINNEY ROAD MOSES KILL 30 - County 1942 04/01/2020 n Y 01 Washingto Argyle (Town) 3305840 3.5 MI S JCT SH40 & SH197 MOORE ROAD MOSES KILL 30 - County 1929 05/04/2021 n N 01 Washingto Argyle (Town) 3203590 VILLAGE OF ARGYLE WEST ROAD MOSES KILL 30 - County 1958 04/22/2021 n N 01 Washingto Argyle (Town) 3306280 1.8 MI S JCT RTS 197 + 40 WEST VALLEY ROAD MOSES KILL 30 - County 1938 07/23/2019 n N 01 Washingto Argyle (Village) 1039870 0.2 MI N JCT RTES 40& 197 197 197 18021063 MOSES KILL NYSDOT 1870 04/08/2021 n N 01 Washingto Cambridge (Town) 3306290 .7 MILE WEST OF BUSKIRK CAMBRIDGE ROAD HALL BROOK 30 - County 1984 04/21/2021 n N 01 Washingto Cambridge (Town) 3305950 3.5 MI SW OF CAMBRIDGE COUNTY ROAD 59 HALL BROOK 30 - County 1930 04/22/2021 n Y 01 Washingto Cambridge (Town) 3306070 5.0MI S OF GREENWICH CR 59A WAMPECACK CREEK 30 - County 1931 04/08/2020 n Y 01 Washingto Cambridge (Town) 3306020 2 MI SOUTH OF CAMBRIDGE KING ROAD WHIPPLE BROOK 30 - County 1930 04/22/2021 n N 01 Washingto Cambridge (Town) 2203600 5 MI SW OF CAMBRIDGE LEES CROSSING RD WHITESIDE CREEK 40 - Town 1992 07/15/2020 n N 01 Washingto Cambridge (Town) 3306140 8 MI S OF CAMBRIDGE RAIL ROAD CR 74 WAMPECACK
    [Show full text]