DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture Structure, Assigned Readings, and Discussion Questions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture Structure, Assigned Readings, and Discussion Questions Lecture Structure, Assigned Readings, and Discussion Questions FES/TOX 434/535 & MCB 535 – Winter 2018 Week 1 Lectures 1: Introduction • 1a Strauss personal introduction • 1b Buermeyer personal introduction • 1b Class overview Lecture 1 readings • We can reprogram life. How to do it wisely (Juan Enriquez, TED Talk, 2015) • Why do many deny science? (Joel Achenbach, Nat Geo 2015) • Americans don't trust scientists' take on food issues (Dan Charles. The Salt, 2016) • The Trump administrations false promise to America (Food Tank, 2017) Lectures 2: Common biotech, genetics and genomic concepts • 2a Biotech in common use – food and pharma • 2b Genetic and genomic concepts Lecture 2 readings • You can thank genetic engineering for your delicious cheese (Levi Gadye, io9, 2015) • Are GMOs Good or Bad? Genetic Engineering & Our Food (Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell, YouTube 2017) • Genetically engineered crops: experiences and prospects (The National Academies of Sciences Engineering Medicine, 2016) Discussion 1: GM and transgenic crops social views Discussion 1 readings • Mark Lynas’s lecture to Oxford Farming (2013) • Smelling a rat (J.L.P., The Economist, 2013) • Why GMOs are “bad” (SciShow, YouTube, 2015) Discussion 1 questions • What does Mark Lynas’s mean by “naturalistic fallacy”? Why does he call vandalism against GM crops akin to burning books? • What can we learn from the controversy over the Seralini publication? • What are the similarities and differences between GE and conventional breeding method? Do you think the conclusion provided in SciShow is well-supported? Week 2 Lecture 3: Sustainability • 3a Key issues of sustainability • 3b Traits that affect sustainability Lecture 3 readings • GM crops, the environment and sustainable food production (Peter H. Raven, Transgenic Research, 2013) • Plating up solutions (Tara Garnett, Science, 2016) • Vegetarian or omnivore: The environmental implications of diet (Tamar Haspel, The Washington Post, 2014) • Comparative impacts of conventional and organic systems Env Res Lett 2017 (read abstract only) Lecture 4: Genetic improvements in agriculture • 4a Plant domestication • 4b Green revolution and modern plant breeding Lecture 4 readings • Green Revolution: Curse or blessing? (IFPRI, 2002) • Norman Borlaug: The genius behind the green revolution (Henry I. Miller, Forbes, 2012) • Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication (Jared Diamond, Nature, 2002) • Popped secret: The mysterious origin of corn (HHMI BioInteractive, 2016) • What fruits and vegetables looked like before we domesticated them (Youtube, Business Insider) Discussion 2: Key issues of sustainability Discussion 2 readings • Making the case for sustainability from industrial agriculture (Tom Nordhaus, GLP, 2017) • How will we survive when the population hits 10 billion – Mann - TED 2018? • Does GMO corn increase crop yields? (Paul McDivitt, GLP 2018) Discussion 2 questions • What is the main purpose of agriculture? Why does Nordhaus argue that misunderstanding of (industrial) agriculture has often led to misguided advocacies? • According to Nordhaus, what principles should we consider to promote sustainable agriculture? • What are the different ways GM crops can contribute or distract from sustainability? Week 3 Lecture 5: Fundamentals of toxicology • 5a TOX Basics: Dose Response • 5b TOX Basics: Risk and exposure Lecture 5 readings • Mother Nature? More like ‘Mad Scientist Mama’ — creator of chemicals good and bad for humans (Steve Savage, GLP, 2017) • Mycotoxin reduction in Bt corn: potential economic, health, and regulatory impacts (Felicia Wu, ISB, 2006) • Biomonitoring of environmental chemicals (Dennis Paustenbach and David Galbraith, Environ Health Perspect., 2006) Lectures 6: Genetic engineering methods and extent of GE crops • 6a Genetic engineering methods • 6b Bt crops • 6c Extent and diversity of GE crops Lecture 6 readings • Agrobacterium gene insertion (YouTube, 2008) • History of agricultural biotechnology: how crop development has evolved (Ania Wieczorek and Mark Wright, Nature Education, 2013) • A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops (abstract only) (Klümper and Qaim, PloS one, 2014) • Insect Resistance to Genetically Engineered Crops: Successes and Failures (Tabashnik, et al, press summary of Nature article, 2014) Discussion 3: Chemicals and cancer risk Discussion 3 reading • Toxicity of natural vs. synthetic pesticides – NY Times blog 2007 • Paracelsus to parascience: the environmental cancer distraction (Bruce N Ames and Lois Swirsky Gold, Mutation Research, 2000) • Glyphosate, Ben and Jerrys, and the NY Times Flap (Kevin Folta, GLP, 2017) Discussion 3 questions • After reading Ames and Gold’s article, what do you think about labeling "all natural"? Is it a type of misleading label that FDA should prohibit? • Ames and Gold mentions that chromosome damage can occur from vitamin deficiencies, similar to that caused by radiation. How does this influence your view on cancer prevention and the term “carcinogens”? • What are the “gold standards” for scientific information? Why does Folta think they have melted today? • If you were a consumer of B&J, does the presence of a trace amount of glyphosate in the ice cream bother you? Why or why not? Week 4 Lectures 7: Gene flow and herbicide tolerant crops • 7a Overview of gene flow and herbicide resistant crops • 7b Examples, coexistence, and adventitious presence Lecture 7 readings • The impact of asynchronous approvals for biotech crops on agricultural sustainability, trade, and innovation (CAST, 2016) (Read Pages 2-3 “The Issue” and Page 8 “Conclusion”) • Why Monsanto thought weeds would never defeat Roundup (Dan Charles, NPR’s The Salt, 2012) • Genetically engineered crops and pesticide use in U.S. maize and soybeans (abstract only) (Perry et al, Science, 2016) • The dicamba fiasco and new GE herbicide tolerant crops (Caitlyn Dewey, GLP, 2017) Lecture 8: Intellectual property • 8a IP basics • 8b IP issues – Biotech and gene flow Lecture 8 readings • Acceptable intellectual property (Stephen Hilgartner, Cornell University, 2006) • Arrested development (Terra, 2014) • Farmer's fight with Monsanto reaches the supreme court (Dan Charles, The Salt, 2013) • I’m a farmer and I signed a contract with Monsanto (GLP, 2016) Discussion 4: Vandana Shiva – eco-hero or charlatan? Discussion 4 readings • Seeds of doubt (Michael Specter, Annals of Science, 2014) • Seeds of truth (Vandana Shiva, Permaculture News, 2014) • New Yorker editor David Remnick responds to Vandana Shiva criticism of Michael Specter’s profile (David Remnick, The New Yorker, 2014) • The complicated truth behind GMO cotton in India (Mark Lynas, Cornell Alliance for Science, 2018) Discussion 4 questions • Do you think that there are greater risks or greater benefits from nutrient biofortification of crops by GE methods compared to conventional breeding? Why? • Do you believe that the controversy surrounding GMOs in the Western hemisphere, and especially in Europe, is hurting the potential of biofortified GMO crops like Golden Rice to help the poor? Do you think it is right for Greenpeace and other anti-GMO organizations to dismiss, and in some cases to actively create dissent against Golden Rice and other biofortified GMO crops as sources of nutrition? • After having read the critique and responses to the Specter article in the New Yorker, do you regard Vandana Shiva as a hero or a villain or some of both? Why? Week 5 Lecture 9: Pesticides and regulation • 9a Pesticide basics: Value and history • 9b Pesticide regulation Lecture 9 readings • What is 'natural' food? A riddle wrapped in notions of good and evil (Alan Levinovitz, The Salt, 2016) • Tackling toxics (Arlene Blum, Science, 2016) • ‘No justification’ for total ban on neonics, say farm leaders (Farmers Weekly 2018) • How activists hijack regulators and demonize chemicals (Ivo Vegter, Daily Maverick, 2017) Lecture 10: GMO regulations • 10a GMO crop regulations - overview • 10b GMO crop regulation - details Lecture 10 readings • How safe does transgenic food need to be? (Laura DeFrancesco, Nature Biotech, 2013) • Is the Bt protein safe for human consumption? (UCbiotech, 2012) • European court suggests relaxed gene-editing rules (Nature 2018) • What Is a Genetically Modified Crop? A European Ruling Sows Confusion (New York Times 2018) • CRISPR plants now subject to tough GM laws in European Union (Nature 2018) Discussion 5: Pesticide exposure and health Discussion 5 readings • Dietary exposure to pesticide residues from commodities alleged to contain the highest contamination levels (Carl K. Winter and Josh M. Katz, Journal of Toxicology, 2011) • Benefits of pesticides (Purdue University, 2006) Discussion 5 questions • Why do the authors feel that methodology used by EWG is not scientifically valid? Do you agree? Do you concur with the view of the authors that substituting organic forms of the “Dirty Dozen” commodities for conventional forms will not lead to any measurable consumer health benefit? Why or why not? • Do you believe that pesticides provide significant benefits for people? For the environment? Are there more benefits than harm? Are generalities meaningful? When and why? Week 6 Lecture 11 readings • RNAi technology (The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2015) • USDA approves modified potato (Andrew Pollack, NY Times, 2014) • These are not your father's GMOs – MIT Tech Rev 2017 Lecture 12 readings • GE tree brief introduction slides (National Research Council, 2016)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Temple Grandin Ingrid Newkirk
    Lesson to Grow Google Lies, Wikipedia Stinks and Siri Doesn’t Even Go Here Description: Grade Level: 9-12 Students will learn how to determine reliable information sources on the internet to develop fact-based writing about agricultural topics. Essential Skills: 1,2, 4. 5, 9 Background: It can be difficult for students to distinguish reputable, accurate sources. In this CCSS: 9-10.RI.4, 9-10.RI.7, lesson, students learn what characteristics to look for on a website to determine the 9-10.W.1, 9-10.W.8, 9-10 W.9, validity of the information being provided. Students will learn to identify credible 11-12.W.8, 11-12.W.9, 11-12. website sources for agricultural related topics. RI.4, 11-12.RI.7, 11-12.W.1 Directions: Part I: Celebrity Sources Time: 2 class periods 1) Divide students into small groups of 2-3 students, provide each group with a stack of Celebrity Cards with instructions to keep the picture side up with no Materials: Google Lies Kit* peeking at the back. 6 Celebrity Cards (set per 2) Today, we are going to look at determining if a source is credible with regards group)* to agriculture. Each group has a stack of cards face up in front up of them with a 5 Heads up Cards (set per picture of a celebrity and a name. You may not know some of them and that’s okay. group)* As a group, you will rank these in order of how trustworthy they would be to use a 5 Gallery Walk Papers source for agricultural purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix IV and Phoenix
    AP/GT Phoenix III ~ SUMMER READING, 2018 Assignment: Read at least three books this summer, one for discussion as a class during the first week of school and at least two more of your own choosing, simply for pleasure. Book #1: Teacher Choice: The Signet Book of American Essays, Edited by M. Jerry Weiss and Helen S. Weiss ISBN-10: 0451530217 ISBN-13: 978-0451530219 Read Mark Twain’s “Advice to Youth” and at least three (3) other selections from this essay collection. You may read any three that you like EXCEPT “Letter from Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King, Jr. and “Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau which we will read together later in the school year. Be prepared to discuss Twain’s essay and your three chosen selections during the first week of school. Books #2 and #3: Student Choice: Read at least two books of your own choosing. they may be classic works or contemporary pieces one must be fiction, one must be non-fiction they may be from any genre (history, science fiction, memoir, mystery, religion, etc.) they must be written for an adult audience For suggestions, see the list of AP authors on the back of this sheet. You do not have to select authors from this list, but it is an excellent place to start. You may also refer to the “Looking for a Good Book?” tab on Ms. Hughes’ website, the bestsellers list of The New York Times, Dallas Morning News, or any other reputable source for suggestions. In addition, librarians, family, and friends can be excellent sources.
    [Show full text]
  • How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money by Peter Pomerantsev and Michael Weiss
    The Menace of Unreality: How the Kremlin Weaponizes Information, Culture and Money by Peter Pomerantsev and Michael Weiss A Special Report presented by The Interpreter, a project of the Institute of Modern Russia imrussia.org interpretermag.com The Institute of Modern Russia (IMR) is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public policy organization—a think tank based in New York. IMR’s mission is to foster democratic and economic development in Russia through research, advocacy, public events, and grant-making. We are committed to strengthening respect for human rights, the rule of law, and civil society in Russia. Our goal is to promote a principles- based approach to US-Russia relations and Russia’s integration into the community of democracies. The Interpreter is a daily online journal dedicated primarily to translating media from the Russian press and blogosphere into English and reporting on events inside Russia and in countries directly impacted by Russia’s foreign policy. Conceived as a kind of “Inopressa in reverse,” The Interpreter aspires to dismantle the language barrier that separates journalists, Russia analysts, policymakers, diplomats and interested laymen in the English-speaking world from the debates, scandals, intrigues and political developments taking place in the Russian Federation. CONTENTS Introductions ...................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ........................................................... 6 Background ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CFI-Annual-Report-2018.Pdf
    Message from the President and CEO Last year was another banner year for the Center the interests of people who embrace reason, for Inquiry. We worked our secular magic in a science, and humanism—the principles of the vast variety of ways: from saving lives of secular Enlightenment. activists around the world who are threatened It is no secret that these powerful ideas like with violence and persecution to taking the no others have advanced humankind by nation’s largest drugstore chain, CVS, to court unlocking human potential, promoting goodness, for marketing homeopathic snake oil as if it’s real and exposing the true nature of reality. If you medicine. are looking for humanity’s true salvation, CFI stands up for reason and science in a way no look no further. other organization in the country does, because This past year we sought to export those ideas to we promote secular and humanist values as well places where they have yet to penetrate. as scientific skepticism and critical thinking. The Translations Project has taken the influential But you likely already know that if you are reading evolutionary biology and atheism books of this report, as it is designed with our supporters in Richard Dawkins and translated them into four mind. We want you not only to be informed about languages dominant in the Muslim world: Arabic, where your investment is going; we want you to Urdu, Indonesian, and Farsi. They are available for take pride in what we have achieved together. free download on a special website. It is just one When I meet people who are not familiar with CFI, of many such projects aimed at educating people they often ask what it is we do.
    [Show full text]
  • GENETICS of TREE ARCHITECTURE in PEACH (Prunus Persica (L.) Batsch)
    GENETICS OF TREE ARCHITECTURE IN PEACH (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) By OMAR CARRILLO MENDOZA A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2012 1 © 2012 Omar Carrillo Mendoza 2 To my wife Patricia and my Mom Marcela with love 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am thankful to my advisor Dr. Jose Chaparro and retired professor Dr. Wayne Sherman, it has been a pleasure to learn from them and be part of the Stone Fruit Breeding Program. To the members of my committee: Dr. Rebecca Darnell, Dr. Kevin Folta, Dr. Matias Kirst and Dr. Jeffrey Williamson for all the guidance during my research. To Dr. James W. Olmstead for allowing me and Patricia for teaching me how to use the real time PCR machine. To Bruce Topp, Jean-Clement Marceillou, Jose Gandia, Jorge Rodriguez, Mohamed Benzit, Paul Lyrene and Thomas Beckman for sharing their experience. To Mark Gal, Cecil Shine, and John Thomas for their valuable help on the farm. To Valerie for her support in the lab. To Elia Ulivi and Dario Chavez for helping me to take field data. To my friends, Andres, Aparna, Divya, Marga, Mitra, Octavio, Preeti, Silvia,Yuan and especially Kendra for their friendship and kindness. To my Mexican fellows: Alberto, Aurora, Miriam, Nicacio, Oscar, Paola, Paula and Sebastian for helping me to adjust to my new home and reminding me my beloved home country. I am especially grateful to CONACYT and the people of Mexico for granting me with a scholarship that made possible this achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • The North American Leaders Session on Agricultural Technology And
    2017 North American Leaders Session on Agricultural Technology and Innovation April 5 – 6, 2017 Disney’s Coronado Springs Resort #CFI17 The North American Leaders Session on Agricultural Technology and Innovation brings together leadership from broad agriculture coalitions and state commodity organizations responsible for earning trust in today’s food system. CFI’s role is to facilitate an information exchange and strategy development that connects individual and organizational efforts. Participants will have the opportunity to discuss programs, celebrating successes and learning from challenges. This meeting provides leaders with a platform to share current programs and also gather insights on how to best reach their key target audiences. Meeting Objectives Connect state and national efforts related to biotechnology and on-farm sustainability practices. Share current programs and insights on how to best reach influencers and regulators. Identify strategies to reach influencers and regulators. Logistics Attendees will hear from a variety of leaders from both attending organizations and allied organizations that can “set-the-stage” for collaborative and educational discussions. Following each presentation there will be ample time for questions and answers as well as an opportunity during state-sharing to highlight key take-a-ways and learnings for strategic direction. After the meeting, CFI will distribute all the strategies to all attendees. Wednesday, April 5 Meeting Room: Durango 1 & 2; Reception and Dinner: Monterrey 1, 2, 3 8:00 a.m. Registration Open 9:00 a.m. Welcome Philip Lobo, United Soybean Board Terry Fleck, The Center for Food Integrity 9:30 a.m. Overview of CFI Technology and Innovation Outreach Terry Fleck, The Center for Food Integrity The Center for Food Integrity is a leader in consumer trust research and a number of research topics have explored how to better communicate with consumers on issues – like technology and innovation, that are complex and at times controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Year and Genetic Factors on Chilling Injury
    Euphytica DOI 10.1007/s10681-011-0572-1 Influence of year and genetic factors on chilling injury susceptibility in peach (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch) Pedro J. Martı´nez-Garcı´a • Cameron P. Peace • Dan E. Parfitt • Ebenezer A. Ogundiwin • Jonathan Fresnedo-Ramı´rez • Abhaya M. Dandekar • Thomas M. Gradziel • Carlos H. Crisosto Received: 30 August 2011 / Accepted: 29 October 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract Chilling injury (CI) is a major physiolog- susceptibility factors and/or experiences inducing ical problem limiting consumption and export of peach conditions. The F-M locus also greatly influences and nectarine (Prunus persica (L.) Batsch). To clarify susceptibility to flesh bleeding, although the physio- the genetic basis for chilling injury, inheritance of the logical mechanism for this disorder is unclear and may major CI symptoms mealiness, flesh browning, flesh be controlled by a different gene closely linked to bleeding, and flesh leatheriness were examined over endoPG. Unlike mealiness, flesh bleeding occurred three years in two related peach progenies. In addition, primarily in non-melting flesh fruit, particularly when genetic relationships among traits and the year-to-year the fruit is white-fleshed. Flesh browning incidence variation in trait performance in these progenies were was greater in mealy fruit and was not associated with tracked. Both populations also segregated for Free- flesh bleeding. Breeding for CI resistance is thus a stone-Melting flesh (F-M) and yellow flesh. There viable long-term strategy to reduce losses in the fresh were significant differences in CI symptoms among and processed peach and nectarine industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Session Abstracts ORALS–MONDAY 102Nd Annual International Conference of the American Society for Horticultural Science Las Vegas, Nevada
    Oral Session Abstracts ORALS–MONDAY 102nd Annual International Conference of the American Society for Horticultural Science Las Vegas, Nevada Presenting authors are denoted by an astrisk (*) the CP treatment had a higher Area Under the Disease Progress Curve than the NST treatment in tomato in 2003. Overall, disease pressure was highest in tomato in 2001. But disease levels within years were Oral Session 1—Organic Horticulture mostly unaffected by amendment treatments. In cabbage, disease was more common in 2002 than in 2003, although head rot was more Moderator: Matthew D. Kleinhenz prevalent in compost-amended plots in 2003 than in manure-amended 18 July 2005, 2:00–4:00 p.m. Ballroom H or control plots. Tomato postharvest quality parameters were similar among amendment and weed treatments within each year. Soil amend- Weed Control in Organic Vegetable Production: The Use ment may enhance crop yield and quality in a transitional-organic of Sweet Corn Transplants and Vinegar system. Also, weed management strategy can alter weed populations and perhaps disease levels. Albert H. Markhart, III *1, Milton J. Harr 2, Paul Burkhouse 3 Consumer Sensory Evaluation of Organically and Con- 1University of Minnesota, Horticultural Science, 223 Alderman Hall, St. Paul, MN, 55108; 2Southwest State University, Southwest Research and Outreach Center, Lamberton, MN, ventionally Grown Spinach 56512; 3Farm, Foxtail Farm, Shafer, MN, 55074 Xin Zhao *1, Edward E. Carey 1, Fadi M. Aramouni2 Weed control in organic vegetable production is a major challenge. 1Kansas State University, Horticulture, Forestry and Recreation Resources, 2021 Throck- During Summer 2004, we conducted fi eld trials to manage weeds in morton Hall, Manhattan, KS, 66506; 2Kansas State University, Animal Sciences and organic sweet corn, carrots and onions.
    [Show full text]
  • JCOM 20(04)(2021)A09 2 Their Opinion Matches the Group’S Opinion, They Will Share It
    COM Silent science: a mixed-methods analysis of faculty J engagement in science communication Taylor K. Ruth, Joy N. Rumble, Lisa K. Lundy, Sebastian Galindo, Hannah S. Carter and Kevin Folta Abstract To address science literacy issues, university faculty have to engage in effective science communication. However, social pressures from peers, administration, or the public may silence their efforts. The purpose of this study was to understand the effect of the spiral of silence on faculty’s engagement with science communication. A survey was distributed to a census of tenure-track faculty at the University of Florida [UF], and the findings did not support the spiral of silence was occurring. However, follow-up interviews revealed faculty did not perceive their peers to value science communication and were more concerned about how the public felt about their research and communication. Keywords Public understanding of science and technology; Science communication: theory and models DOI https://doi.org/10.22323/2.20040209 Submitted: 7th September 2020 Accepted: 17th April 2021 Published: 26th July 2021 Context The definition for science literacy has expanded from once only including individuals’ ability to understand science [American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1990] to include ability to apply that knowledge along with perceptions and trust in science [National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NAS), 2016]. Recent research has concluded the public has an adequate understanding of scientific topics; however, knowledge gaps have been identified across demographic groups, like education and gender [Funk and Kehaulani Goo, 2015; National Science Board (NSB), 2016]. These knowledge gaps underscore the need for targeted science literacy efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Idea Exchange Brings Together Veterans and New Representatives
    NEWSLETTER Idea Exchange Brings Together Veterans and April - June 2010 New Representatives from State Centers By Guy Lamolinara The axiom that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts was in evidence on June 28-29, when the State Centers for the Book came together in Washington for their annual Idea Exchange meeting. Many longtime faces were present and several new ones joined the fold of enthu- siastic promoters of books and reading. “This is always an exciting time for the Library of Congress and Center for the Book staff,” John Y. Cole, director of the national Center for the Book in Washington. Cole said he was also “excited” to take meeting attendees later in the day to the Jefferson Building for a visit to the Young Readers Center, which recently doubled in size in April. (The YRC officially opened The Center for the Book’s last October. See Center for the Book Newsletter September-December 2009.) networks of state centers and reading promotion part- Following self-introductions from those assembled, the group heard from Charles ners extend the reach of the Trueheart, director of the Center for the Book’s new reading promotion partner, national center far beyond the American Library in Paris, which is celebrating its 90th year. The library the programs it sponsors in was started during World War I, said Trueheart, when American libraries sent a the Washington area. The million and a half books to Paris for the soldiers. “So some high-minded people national center in the Library in France decided to create of Congress has established an American library.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Krasny Has Interviewed a Wide Range of Major Political and Cultural Figures Including Edward Albee, Madeleine Albright
    Michael Krasny has interviewed a wide range of major political and cultural figures including Edward Albee, Madeleine Albright, Sherman Alexei, Robert Altman, Maya Angelou, Margaret Atwood, Ken Auletta, Paul Auster, Richard Avedon, Joan Baez, Alec Baldwin, Dave Barry, Harry Belafonte, Annette Bening, Wendell Berry, Claire Bloom, Andy Borowitz, T.S. Boyle, Ray Bradbury, Ben Bradlee, Bill Bradley, Stephen Breyer, Tom Brokaw, David Brooks, Patrick Buchanan, William F. Buckley Jr, Jimmy Carter, James Carville, Michael Chabon, Noam Chomsky, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Cesar Chavez, Bill Cosby, Sandra Cisneros, Billy Collins, Pat Conroy, Francis Ford Coppola, Jacques Cousteau, Michael Crichton, Francis Crick, Mario Cuomo, Tony Curtis, Marc Danner, Ted Danson, Don DeLillo, Gerard Depardieu, Junot Diaz, Leonardo DiCaprio, Joan Didion, Maureen Dowd. Jennifer Egan, Daniel Ellsberg, Rahm Emanuel, Nora Ephron, Susan Faludi, Diane Feinstein, Jane Fonda, Barney Frank, Jonathan Franzen, Lady Antonia Fraser, Thomas Friedman, Carlos Fuentes, John Kenneth Galbraith, Andy Garcia, Jerry Garcia, Robert Gates, Newt Gingrich, Allen Ginsberg, Malcolm Gladwell, Danny Glover, Jane Goodall, Stephen Greenblatt, Matt Groening, Sammy Hagar, Woody Harrelson, Robert Hass, Werner Herzog, Christopher Hitchens, Nick Hornby, Khaled Hosseini, Patricia Ireland, Kazuo Ishiguro, Molly Ivins, Jesse Jackson, PD James, Bill T. Jones, James Earl Jones, Ashley Judd, Pauline Kael, John Kerry, Tracy Kidder, Barbara Kingsolver, Alonzo King, Galway Kinnell, Ertha Kitt, Paul Krugman, Ray
    [Show full text]
  • Literary Award Gala
    NASHVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY LITERARY AWARD GALA NPLF.org LITERARY AWARD GALA The Nashville Public Library Literary Award was established in 2004 to recognize distinguished authors and other individuals for their contributions to the world of books and reading. Each year the award brings an outstanding individual to Nashville to honor his or her achievements, to benefit the library and to promote books and literacy. he NPL Literary Award weekend draws an audience T of nearly 1,000 cultural, political, community and business leaders from Nashville and beyond. Each year, the celebration begins with a Patrons Party. Often called “the best book club in town,” the annual gathering provides an intimate setting for guests to mingle, network and spark riveting conversation. The Literary Award Gala follows at the beautiful downtown library. The black-tie affair begins with cocktails in Ingram Hall and is followed by dinner and remarks from the honoree in the Grand Reading Room. Proceeds from the Literary Award’s Patrons Party and -John Lewis, 2016 Literary Award Honoree Gala benefit the Nashville Public Library Foundation’s mission to support and enhance the Literary Award Honorees Nashville Public Library. Elizabeth Gilbert, 2017 To learn more about sponsorship opportunities, please contact Amanda Tate: [email protected]. John Lewis, 2016 Jon Meacham, 2015 Scott Turow, 2014 Robert K. Massie, 2013 Margaret Atwood, 2012 John McPhee, 2011 Billy Collins, 2010 Doris Kearns Goodwin, 2009 John Irving, 2008 Ann Patchett, 2007 John Updike, 2006 David McCullough, 2005 David Halberstam, 2004 NPLF.org David Remnick 2018 Literary Award Honoree David Remnick has been the editor of The New Yorker since 1998 and a staff writer since 1992.
    [Show full text]