GETTING IT RIGHT 43,000 Fact-Checkers Can’T Be Wrong
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mountain Bike Accessories for Trail Work
Part 1 of 3 United States Department of Agriculture MountainMountain BikeBike Forest Service Technology & Development AccessoriesAccessories forfor Program 2300 Recreation April 1998 TTrailrail WWorkork 9823-2812-MTDC Brian Vachowski, Project Leader 7E72A47–Accessories for Transporting Trail Maintenance Tools 1 Part 1 of 3 Contents Acknowledgments Part 1of 3 any people throughout the country who are not listed Introduction ___________________________ 3 here helped on this project with their comments and MM suggestions. I am especially grateful to the following The Situation at Seward _________________ 4 for their indepth contributions: Benefits of Bicycles ____________________ 5 Suzanne Hanlon, Adventure Cycling Association Not for Everyone _______________________ 6 Stephen Hmurciak, Seward Ranger District Panniers ______________________________ 7 Irene Lindquist, Seward Ranger District Chain Saw Carrier ______________________ 8 Kurt Loheit, International Mountain Bicycling Assn. Part 2 of 3 John Morris, Burley Design Cooperative Trailers ______________________________ 10 Sylvia Russell, Recreational Equipment, Inc. B.O.B. Yak Trailer _________________________ 10 B.O.B. Coz Trailer _________________________ 11 Wheele Pac Dog Trailer _____________________ 11 Keith Wolferman, Missoula Aerial Fire Depot Burley Design Cooperative’s Prototype _________ 11 Part 3 of 3 MTDC Staff: Bob Beckley, Windy Hayden, Bob Hensler, Product Sources and Organizations ______ 14 Gary Hoshide, Bert Lindler, and Sara Lustgraaf. About the Author______________________ 14 Appendix A—Job Hazard Analyses for Riding Mountain Bicycles and for Trailers _____________ 15 Appendix B—Kurt Loheit’s Tool Holder (Fits B.O.B. Yak Trailer) _______________________ 17 The Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, has developed this information for the guidance of its employees, its contractors, and its cooperating Federal and State agencies, and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone except its own employees. -
Title of PAPER
Journal of Special Topics P2_7 Power Curves and Gear Ratios in Bicycles J. Anand, A. Buccheri, M. Gorley, I. Weaver Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH. November 19, 2009 Abstract This article investigates how the power exerted by a cyclist varies with cyclist speed, and gear ratio. From Hill’s relation, both relations are determined and plotted. Suggestions are made on how these results might be useful to recreational and competitive cyclists. P2_2 Sports Science pedalling rates than contraction velocity (as in Hill’s relation), so we substitute v=ωr where r Introduction is the pedal crank arm length. Originally, Hill Gears in bicycles are often misused. Many used parameters for the mechanics of muscle people have experienced that pedalling in a fibres to determine the unknowns in this high gear from stationary is very difficult, and equation. However, since the cyclic pedalling produces very little acceleration. Equally, a motion is not as well studied as basic linear low gear at high speeds is inefficient. This contraction, values for a, b and c must be article explores the relationship between found from the special cases. That it, at ω=0 bicycle gearing, and the cyclist power output. where F=F0, and at F=0 where ω=ω0. Power Functions (1) (2) The force exerted by any engine is always applied in 2 different areas. The first is These 2 equations alone are not enough to accelerating engine components, and the determine values for the 3 unknowns. other is in the system on which you want to However, by considering the maximum power do work. -
THE IMPORTANCE of SINGLETRACK from the International Mountain Bicycling Association
THE IMPORTANCE OF SINGLETRACK From the International Mountain Bicycling Association “Mountain biking on singletrack is like skiing in fresh powder, or matching the hatch while fly fishing, or playing golf at Pebble Beach.” —Bill Harris; Montrose, Colorado “On singletrack I meet and talk to lots of hikers and bikers and I don’t do that nearly as much on fire roads. Meeting people on singletrack brings you a little closer to them.” — Ben Marriott; Alberta, Canada INTRODUCTION In recent years mountain bike trail advocates have increasingly needed to defend the legitimacy of bicycling on singletrack trails. As land agencies have moved forward with a variety of recreational planning processes, some officials and citizens have objected to singletrack bicycling, and have suggested that bicyclists should be satisfied with riding on roads – paved and dirt surfaced. This viewpoint misunderstands the nature of mountain bicycling and the desires of bicyclists. Bike riding on narrow, natural surface trails is as old as the bicycle. In its beginning, all bicy- cling was essentially mountain biking, because bicycles predate paved roads. In many historic photographs from the late 19th-century, people are shown riding bicycles on dirt paths. During World War II the Swiss Army outfitted companies of soldiers with bicycles to more quickly travel on narrow trails through mountainous terrain. In the 1970’s, when the first mountain bikes were being fashioned from existing “clunkers,” riders often took their bikes on natural surface routes. When the mass production of mountain bikes started in the early 1980’s, more and more bicyclists found their way into the backcountry on narrow trails. -