Western Australian Naturalist 30
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Draft Animal Keepers Species List
Revised NSW Native Animal Keepers’ Species List Draft © 2017 State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this report in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. All content in this publication is owned by OEH and is protected by Crown Copyright, unless credited otherwise. It is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), subject to the exemptions contained in the licence. The legal code for the licence is available at Creative Commons. OEH asserts the right to be attributed as author of the original material in the following manner: © State of New South Wales and Office of Environment and Heritage 2017. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage 59 Goulburn Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box A290, -
An Annotated Type Catalogue of the Dragon Lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the Collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J
RECORDS OF THE WESTERN AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM 34 115–132 (2019) DOI: 10.18195/issn.0312-3162.34(2).2019.115-132 An annotated type catalogue of the dragon lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the collection of the Western Australian Museum Ryan J. Ellis Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool DC, Western Australia 6986, Australia. Biologic Environmental Survey, 24–26 Wickham St, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT – The Western Australian Museum holds a vast collection of specimens representing a large portion of the 106 currently recognised taxa of dragon lizards (family Agamidae) known to occur across Australia. While the museum’s collection is dominated by Western Australian species, it also contains a selection of specimens from localities in other Australian states and a small selection from outside of Australia. Currently the museum’s collection contains 18,914 agamid specimens representing 89 of the 106 currently recognised taxa from across Australia and 27 from outside of Australia. This includes 824 type specimens representing 45 currently recognised taxa and three synonymised taxa, comprising 43 holotypes, three syntypes and 779 paratypes. Of the paratypes, a total of 43 specimens have been gifted to other collections, disposed or could not be located and are considered lost. An annotated catalogue is provided for all agamid type material currently and previously maintained in the herpetological collection of the Western Australian Museum. KEYWORDS: type specimens, holotype, syntype, paratype, dragon lizard, nomenclature. INTRODUCTION Australia was named by John Edward Gray in 1825, The Agamidae, commonly referred to as dragon Clamydosaurus kingii Gray, 1825 [now Chlamydosaurus lizards, comprises over 480 taxa worldwide, occurring kingii (Gray, 1825)]. -
Native Animal Species List
Native animal species list Native animals in South Australia are categorised into one of four groups: • Unprotected • Exempt • Basic • Specialist. To find out the category your animal is in, please check the list below. However, Specialist animals are not listed. There are thousands of them, so we don’t carry a list. A Specialist animal is simply any native animal not listed in this document. Mammals Common name Zoological name Species code Category Dunnart Fat-tailed dunnart Sminthopsis crassicaudata A01072 Basic Dingo Wild dog Canis familiaris Not applicable Unprotected Gliders Squirrel glider Petaurus norfolcensis E04226 Basic Sugar glider Petaurus breviceps E01138 Basic Possum Common brushtail possum Trichosurus vulpecula K01113 Basic Potoroo and bettongs Brush-tailed bettong (Woylie) Bettongia penicillata ogilbyi M21002 Basic Long-nosed potoroo Potorous tridactylus Z01175 Basic Rufous bettong Aepyprymnus rufescens W01187 Basic Rodents Mitchell's hopping-mouse Notomys mitchellii Y01480 Basic Plains mouse (Rat) Pseudomys australis S01469 Basic Spinifex hopping-mouse Notomys alexis K01481 Exempt Wallabies Parma wallaby Macropus parma K01245 Basic Red-necked pademelon Thylogale thetis Y01236 Basic Red-necked wallaby Macropus rufogriseus K01261 Basic Swamp wallaby Wallabia bicolor E01242 Basic Tammar wallaby Macropus eugenii eugenii C05889 Basic Tasmanian pademelon Thylogale billardierii G01235 Basic 1 Amphibians Common name Zoological name Species code Category Southern bell frog Litoria raniformis G03207 Basic Smooth frog Geocrinia laevis -
A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Ecological Diversification in the Australian Lizard Genus Ctenophorus
JEZ Mde 2035 JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ZOOLOGY (MOL DEV EVOL) 291:339–353 (2001) A Molecular Phylogenetic Study of Ecological Diversification in the Australian Lizard Genus Ctenophorus JANE MELVILLE,* JAMES A. SCHULTE II, AND ALLAN LARSON Department of Biology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri 63130 ABSTRACT We present phylogenetic analyses of the lizard genus Ctenophorus using 1,639 aligned positions of mitochondrial DNA sequences containing 799 parsimony-informative charac- ters for samples of 22 species of Ctenophorus and 12 additional Australian agamid genera. Se- quences from three protein-coding genes (ND1, ND2, and COI) and eight intervening tRNA genes are examined using both parsimony and maximum-likelihood analyses. Species of Ctenophorus form a monophyletic group with Rankinia adelaidensis, which we suggest placing in Ctenophorus. Ecological differentiation among species of Ctenophorus is most evident in the kinds of habitats used for shelter. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the ancestral condition is to use burrows for shelter, and that habits of sheltering in rocks and shrubs/hummock grasses represent separately derived conditions. Ctenophorus appears to have undergone extensive cladogenesis approximately 10–12 million years ago, with all three major ecological modes being established at that time. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 291:339–353, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. The agamid lizard genus Ctenophorus provides ecological categories based on whether species abundant opportunity for a molecular phylogenetic shelter in rocks, burrows, or vegetation. Eight spe- study of speciation and ecological diversification. cies of Ctenophorus are associated with rocks: C. Agamid lizards show a marked radiation in Aus- caudicinctus, C. decresii, C. fionni, C. -
Vertebrate Fauna Assessment
A LEVEL 1 VERTEBRATE FAUNA ASSESSMENT OF THE PROPOSED FORTESCUE RIVER GAS PIPELINE, WESTERN AUSTRALIA Prepared for: DDG & Mattiske Consulting Pty Ltd Prepared by: Ninox Wildlife Consulting December 2013 i Solomon Hub to CS 1 Gas Pipeline – Level 1 Vertebrate Fauna Assessment Table of Contents Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 3 3 STUDY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................... 3 4 NOMENCLATURE, TAXONOMY AND DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS ........................................... 5 5 METHODS .................................................................................................................................................. 5 5.1 PHASE 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 5 5.2 PHASE 2 .............................................................................................................................................. 5 5.3 STUDY TEAM ...................................................................................................................................... 6 5.4 STUDY LIMITATIONS ......................................................................................................................... -
Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective
Species Richness in Time and Space: a Phylogenetic and Geographic Perspective by Pascal Olivier Title A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in The University of Michigan 2018 Doctoral Committee: Assistant Professor and Assistant Curator Daniel Rabosky, Chair Associate Professor Johannes Foufopoulos Professor L. Lacey Knowles Assistant Professor Stephen A. Smith Pascal O Title [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6316-0736 c Pascal O Title 2018 DEDICATION To Judge Julius Title, for always encouraging me to be inquisitive. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research presented in this dissertation has been supported by a number of research grants from the University of Michigan and from academic societies. I thank the Society of Systematic Biologists, the Society for the Study of Evolution, and the Herpetologists League for supporting my work. I am also extremely grateful to the Rackham Graduate School, the University of Michigan Museum of Zoology C.F. Walker and Hinsdale scholarships, as well as to the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Block grants, for generously providing support throughout my PhD. Much of this research was also made possible by a Rackham Predoctoral Fellowship, and by a fellowship from the Michigan Institute for Computational Discovery and Engineering. First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Dan Rabosky, for taking me on as one of his first graduate students. I have learned a tremendous amount under his guidance, and conducting research with him has been both exhilarating and inspiring. I am also grateful for his friendship and company, both in Ann Arbor and especially in the field, which have produced experiences that I will never forget. -
Adenovirus Infection in Bearde
Fact sheet Adenoviral hepatitis is a common cause of neonatal and juvenile mortality in captive bearded dragons (Pogona spp.) in the USA. Although adenoviral infection has been reported in both captive and free-living bearded dragons in Australia, there is little information on the prevalence of disease. Disease associated with adenovirus has only been reported in captive bearded dragons. Both free-living reptiles and captive populations are at risk from this virus in Australia. Adenoviruses are medium-sized (80–110 nm), non-enveloped viruses containing a double stranded DNA genome (Moormann et al. 2009). Adenoviral infections have been recorded from a large number of reptile species including snakes, dragons, skinks, geckos, chameleons, monitors, crocodiles and tortoises (Jacobson 2007). Adenoviruses are generally regarded as being species specific and the majority of infections in bearded dragons have been caused by Agamid adenovirus-1 (AgAdv-1), as confirmed by PCR (Wellehan et al. 2004; Kübber-Heiss et al. 2006; Wagner et al. 2007; Moormann et al. 2009; Doneley et al. 2014; Hyndman and Shilton 2016). However, there is one report of lizard atadenovirus infection in a western bearded dragon (Pogona minor minor), while AgAdv-1 has been found in a central netted dragon (Ctenophorus nuchalis), a species in the same subfamily as bearded dragons (Hyndman and Shilton 2011). Given the high prevalence of AgAdv-1 in bearded dragons overseas it seems likely that some, if not all, of the adenovirus infections in bearded dragons reported before the advent of PCR were due to AgAdv-1 virus (Julian and Durham 1982; Frye et al. -
Shape of Western Australian Dragon Lizards (Agamidae)
Amphibia-Reptilia 26 (2005): 73-85 Shape of Western Australian dragon lizards (Agamidae) Graham G. Thompson1, Philip C. Withers2 Abstract. For 41 species of Western Australian agamid lizards, we found that most appendage lengths vary isometrically, so shape is largely independent of size. Of the three methods we used to quantitatively remove the effects of size on shape, the two that use principal component analysis (PCA; Jolicoeur, 1963; Somers, 1986; 1989) provided similar results, whereas regression residuals (against body length) provided a different interpretation. Somers’ size-free PCA approach to remove the size-effects was the most useful because it provided ‘size-free’ scores for each species that were further analysed using other techniques, and its results seemed more biologically meaningful. Some, but not all, of the variation in size-free shape for these lizards could be related to phylogeny, retreat choice and performance traits. Introduction that ratios should not be used for a variety of reasons. Many authors have used residuals of The obvious differences in head and limb di- morphological characteristics regressed against mensions (shape) among species of Western a body dimension (e.g. snout-to-vent length) to Australian (WA) dragon lizards (Agamidae; remove the effects of size before assessing the subsequently referred as dragons) are probably relationship between ‘size-free’ shape and habi- related to performance traits, behaviour and pre- tat use (e.g. Malhotra and Thorpe, 1997; Van- ferred habitat (Losos, 1990; Garland and Losos, hooydonck and Van Damme, 1999; Herrel et 1994; Miles, 1994; Malhotra and Thorpe, 1997; al., 2001, 2002; Kohlsdorf et al., 2001). -
Taxonomic Assessment of Diporiphora (Reptilia: Agamidae) Dragon Lizards from the Western Arid Zone of Australia
Zootaxa 3518: 1–24 (2012) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2012 · Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:45D8F963-B9CA-4386-B54D-6C6E6AE72C63 Taxonomic assessment of Diporiphora (Reptilia: Agamidae) dragon lizards from the western arid zone of Australia PAUL DOUGHTY1,3, LUKE KEALLEY1 & JANE MELVILLE2 1Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Western Australian Museum, 49 Kew St, Welshpool, Western Australia, Australia. 2 Department of Sciences, GPO Box 666, Museum Victoria, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3Corresponding author email: [email protected] Abstract Members of the genus Diporiphora are slender perching agamid lizards from Australasia, with a conservative morphology and some outstanding taxonomic issues. Here we assess morphological variation in the morphologically similar D. pin- dan, D. valens, and D. winneckei from the western deserts of Australia. A reassessment of morphological differences that included the presence or absence of a gular fold, revealed D. pindan to be much more widely distributed than previously thought, occurring as far south as the northern Pilbara and east to the Tanami Desert. Examination of D. valens specimens revealed a north-south split within the Pilbara, with specimens conspecific with the types from the Hamersley Range in the southern Pilbara, whereas recently collected specimens from the Chichester and Roebourne regions in the northern Pilbara differ morphologically, and are described as a new species. Examination of the type of D. winneckei and topotypic material indicates that populations referable to this species are confined to the eastern arid zone. The isolated far western population of ‘D. winneckei’ from the Carnarvon Basin differs in morphology from the eastern arid zone D. -
Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia Julie Rej East Tennessee State University
East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2017 Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia Julie Rej East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Paleontology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Rej, Julie, "Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3210. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/3210 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia ____________________________________ A thesis presented to the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences ____________________________________ by Julie Rej May 2017 ____________________________________ Dr. Blaine Schubert, Chair Dr. Steven Wallace Dr. Chris Widga Keywords: Agamidae, Pogona, Ctenophorus, Tympanocryptis, Hastings Cave, Horseshoe Cave, Western Australia, Squamata, Late Quaternary ABSTRACT Late Quaternary Dragon Lizards (Agamidae: Squamata) from Western Australia by Julie Rej Fossil Agamidae from Western Australia have been the subject of limited study. To aid in fossil agamid identification, Hocknull (2002) examined the maxilla and dentary of several extant species from Australia and determined diagnostic characters for various species groups. In the study here, fossil agamids from two localities in Western Australia, Hastings Cave and Horseshoe Cave, were examined, grouped, and identified to the lowest unambiguous taxonomic level. -
Bearded Dragon, Pogona Vitticeps 50 - Pallid Cuckoo, Cuculus Pallidus 50 - Wolf Spider, Lycosa Spp
Biodiversity Surveys 2009 2 Contents Introduction 4 - Land for Wildlife 4 - Biodiversity Surveys 4 Background Information 6 - Land units on survey properties 7 - Vegetation Communities present 8 - Buffel Grass Eradication 9 Methods and Materials 10 - Elliott traps 10 - Pitfall traps 11 - Funnel traps 12 Weather Conditions 13 Site Survey Results 14 Week 1 - Site 1: Chateau Rd. 14 o Birds 14 o Reptiles 15 o Mammals 16 o Invertebrates 16 o Photos 17 - Site 2: Brunonia Rd. 19 o Birds 19 o Reptiles 20 o Mammals 21 o Invertebrates 21 o Photos 22 Week 2 - Site 3: Heffernan Rd. 23 o Birds 23 o Reptiles 24 o Mammals 26 o Invertebrates 27 o Photos 28 - Site 4: Schaber Rd. 29 o Birds 29 o Reptiles 31 o Mammals 32 o Invertebrates 32 o Photos 34 3 A comparison with the AZRI property 36 o Birds 37 o Reptiles 38 o Mammals 39 o Introduced Plant Species 39 Conclusion 40 - Trends & findings 40 - Breeding Activity 41 - Bird Surveys 41 - Reptiles 42 - Invertebrates 42 - Weed presence 43 - A comparison with AZRI 43 - Land for Wildlife members & Monitoring 44 References 45 Acknowledgements 46 Appendix 47 - 1: November 2009 Daily Weather Observations, Alice Springs, NT 47 2: December 2009 Daily Weather Observations, Alice Springs, NT 48 3. Fauna profiles 49 - Tree Dtella, Gehyra variegata 49 - Central Netted Dragon, Ctenophorus nuchalis 49 - Bearded Dragon, Pogona vitticeps 50 - Pallid Cuckoo, Cuculus pallidus 50 - Wolf Spider, Lycosa spp. 51 - House Mouse, Mus musculus 51 - Sandy Inland Mouse, Pseudomys hermannsburgensis 52 - Scorpion 52 4. Vegetation Profiles 55 - Harlequin Mistletoe, Lysiana exocarpi 55 - Fork-leaved Corkwood, Hakea divaricata 55 - Wild Passionfruit/Caper Bush, Capparis spinosa subsp. -
Selected Fauna of the Onslow Region
Selected fauna of the Onslow region Prepared by Ray Turnbull, Scott Thompson and Graham Thompson Selected fauna of the Onslow region Ray Turnbull, Scott Thompson and Graham Thompson Terrestrial Ecosystems i All rights reserved. Except under the conditions described in the Australian Copyright Act 1968 and subsequent amendments, no part of this publication maybe reproduced. Published by: Terrestrial Ecosystems 10 Houston Place Mt Claremont, Western Australia, 6010. First published in 2013 ISBN – 978-0-9875497-0-9 Notice No responsibility is implicitly or explicitly assumed or accepted by the authors or publisher for any injury and / or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. Images: Upper left – Gehyra pilbara Upper right – Rainbow Bee-eater (Merops ornatus) Lower left – Euro (Macropus robustus) Lower right – Sheep Frog (Cyclorana maini) All images are taken by Terrestrial Ecosystems unless otherwise noted. This document is formatted to print double sided. Table of Contents Frogs of the Onslow region ..................................................................................................................... 1 Cyclorana maini – Sheep Frog ............................................................................................................. 2 Litoria caerulea – Green Tree Frog ....................................................................................................