Negotiated Vs. Judge-Niade Aboriginal Law: Bfudging the Two Solitudes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Negotiated Vs. Judge-Niade Aboriginal Law: Bfudging the Two Solitudes NEGOTIATED VS. JUDGE-NIADE ABORIGINAL LAW: BFUDGING THE TWO SOLITUDES Julie Ramona Jai A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of LL.M. Graduate Department of Law University of Toronto Q Copyright by Julie Ramona Jai (September, 2000). National Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawsON K1A ON4 Ottawa ON K1A ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant à la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/fïlm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission. autorisation. NEGOTIATED VS. JUDGE-MADE ABORIGINAL LAW: BRIDGING THE TWO SOLITUDES A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of LL.M. Graduate Depment of Law, University of Toronto Julie Ramona Jai, 2000. ABSTRACT This paper examines the two streams through which Aboriginal law is currently being developed - through negotiations, and through court decisions. It then analyzes the interaction between these two strearns, both positive and negative. It is my thesis that a greater understanding b y courts of modern negotiated agreements will provide them with a source of law, and with an understanding of Aboriginal perspectives, which will help them to better bridge the gap between their stated objectives, and the "on the ground" impact of their decisions. Both negotiated and judge-made Aboriginal law must interact in a more synergistic way if society is to meet the challenges inherent in reconciling preexisting Aboriginal occupation with the cument reality of a largely non-Aboriginal population with competing nghts and interests. Greater mutual understanding of their respective roles, strengths and weaknesses will help these two streams of law to work together, rather than at cross-purposes. NEGOTLQTED VS .JUDGE-MADE ABORIGINAL LAW: BRIDGING TKE TWO SOLITUDES TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....... ... ......................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER OM3: NEGOTIATED ABONGINAL LAW TKROUGH MODERN TREATIES: A STUDY OF THE PROCESS. ITS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES A . Introduction ..................... .,, ................................................................................................ 5 B . Theoretical Underphings and Governing Pnnciples of Nego tiated Abonginal Law 1. Historical Treaties ...................................................... ............................................... 8 2 . Modem Treaties and Self-Goverriment Agreements in the Yukon .............................. 9 3. Why Parties Negotiate ................................................................................................ 11 4 . Relative Benefits of Negotiation vs . Litigation a Benefits of the Negotiation Process - the Yukon Perspective .............................. 13 b . Criticisms of the Negotiation Process - the Yukon Perspective ........................... 16 c . Perspectives of Academics and Judges on Negotiations as a Means to Address Aboriginal Claims ............................................................................... 19 C . Process and Parties to Modem Treaty. Negotiations ....................................................... 23 1. Comprehensive Claims Negotiations ........................................................................ 23 2 . Parties. at. the Table and Format of Negotiations....................................................... 26 3 . Negotiating Approaches.............................................................................................. 27 D . Principles Arisinp fiom the Negotiation Process and the Yukon Agreements ................. 31 E . Resul ts .............................................................................................................................. 34 F . Negotiated Abonginal Law ............................................................................................... 38 Appendix 1 ........................................................................................................................... 41 Appendix II ............................................................................................................................. 42 CHAPTER WO: JUDGE-MADE ABORIGNAL LAW: A STUDY OF THE PROCESS. ITS STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES A . odction....................................................................................................................... 43 B . Theoretical. Underpinnings and Goveming Principles of Judge-Made Aborigind Law 1. Pnnciples of Judging................................................................................................... 44 2 . Approaches to Interpretation ....................................................................................... 47 3 . The Influence of Personal Characteristics on Judge-Made Law ................................. 49 4. Sources of Law ........................................................................................................ 51 5. Uniquely Challenging Factors to Judge-Made Aboriginal Law ............................... 52 6. 1s Aboriginal Law Invented Law? ................................................................ .. ......... 58 C. Process and Parties in Developing Judge-Made Aboriginal Law 1 . Process and Parties in the Supreme Court of Canada ................................................ 60 2. lnherent Limitations of the frocess ............................................................ .............. 61 CHAlPTER THREE: THE EFFECT OF NEGOTIATED AB0RiGINA.L LAW ON JUDGE-MADE ABONGINAL LAW A . Introduction.................................................................................................................... 64 B . The Lack of Impact of Modem Treaties on Judge-made Aboriginal law ......................... 65 C . Reasons Why Modem Land Clairn and Self-government Agreements are Rarely Referred to by Courts .................................................................................... 68 D . Potential Contributions of Negotiated Aboriginal Law to Judge-made Aboriginal Law ............................................................................................ 74 A . Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 82 B . Ways in which Judge-made Law Cm Affect Negotiated Abonginal Law ....................... 83 1. Cases Interpreting Historic Treaties or Dealing with Abonginal Rights .................... 83 a . Interpretive Principles ........................................................................................... 84 b . Substantive Rights, Legal Principles and Bargaining Power ................................ 89 2 . Cases Interpreting Modem Treaties ............................................................................ 94 3 . Cases Specifically Relating to the Negotiation Process ........................................... 100 C . Case Study: impact of the Delgamuukw Decision on the Yukon Treaty Negotiations ............................................................................................. 105 1. The Yukon Land Claim Negotiations ....................................................................... 105 2 . Review of the Delgamurikw Decision and its Potential Impact on Modem Land Claim Negotiations a . What's New in the Delgamzirrkw Decision? ....................................................... 111 b . What Elements Could be Helpful to Negotiations? ........................................... 115 c. What Elements Might be Harmful to Negotiations? ........................................... 117 d . How Might the Decision Affect Existing Yukon Land Claim Agreements? ..... 119 3. Conclusion .............................................................................................................. 123 CWTER FIVE: CONCLUSION A . Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 125 B . Challenges Facing Both Negotiating Tables and Courts ................................................ 126 C . Structural Limitations of Court Processes as Compared with Negotiations 1. Focus on Legal Rights .............................................................................................. 129 2. Lack of Involvement of Aboriginal People ............................................................... 131 3. Limited Ability of Courts to Consider Matenal as to the Wider Context ................ 132 D . Arguments in Favour of Increased Dialogue Between the Two Strearns of Aboriginal Law 1. Potential Impacts of Court Decisions on Negotiations ............................................. 134 2. Potential Impacts of Negotiated Agreements on Court Decisions...........................
Recommended publications
  • YORK STUDENT Welcome to York Maddy Chose York for Its Desirable Toronto Location, Multicultural Environment and Extensive Course Offerings
    BEING A YORK STUDENT Welcome to York Maddy chose York for its desirable Toronto location, multicultural environment and extensive course offerings. “York really gave me the freedom to pursue all of my passions, allowing me to take an interdisciplinary approach to my studies,” she says. “I love that I can combine all of my passions and interests into one major.” As an international student, she especially appreciated the welcoming vibe of the large, beautiful and diverse campus. “One of the most profound parts of York, in my opinion, As our closest neighbour, the York University is Canada’s leading interdisciplinary is that it gives you the United States plays an integral teaching and research university, offering a modern experience to be a well- role in life in Canada and at rounded world citizen, which academic experience at both the undergraduate and York. Since our countries are is necessary in this globalized graduate levels in Toronto — Canada’s financial hub so closely tied, York maintains 21st century.” and most international city. York’s Keele campus is excellent relationships with a a self-contained community and a global centre for After graduation, Maddy plans number of American academic research and information. The Glendon campus, on to continue her education institutions. Our connections here at York by attending the other hand, is the only fully integrated bilingual Maddy MacKechnie with the United States range graduate school. campus of its kind in Canada, where students take From Wisconsin, USA from arts and academics to courses in English and French and often learn a third BA Hons.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Law: Issues, Individuals, Institutions And
    Fourword: Issues, Individuals, Institutions and Ideas JOHN BORROWS∗ There is a story about a young man who had a dream. In this dream he saw people scrambling up and down the rugged faces of four hills. When he looked closer he noticed each hill seemed to have different groups of people trying to scale its heights.1 He was perplexed. The first hill, to the east, was covered with very small people. Many were weeping and crying; some were covered in blood or lay lifeless at the base. The foot of the hill where they were piled was shrouded in darkness. The shadows and twisted heap made it hard to see how many were gathered there in death, or life. A bit higher, other tiny bodies could be seen crawling over rocks and spring scrub, determinedly edging their way higher over rough terrain. Knees were scraped, hands were red, but their upward progress was noticeable. At other points it was possible to see some totter forward on wobbly legs, through halting steps and tender help from a few around them. Small bits of tobacco would change hands in thanks. Some were laughing and playing, joyfully climbing to their destination. They seemed to be enjoying the challenge that stood before them. They learned from their mistakes, and carefully watched those around them to see how to go on. Yet, every so often one would trip, or lose their hold on the hill, and tumble and scrape to the bottom. A few had reached the top, and stood in the bright yellow glow of the morning sun.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Exploration of Outsider Course Enrollment in Canadian Legal Education Natasha Bakht
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Volume 45, Number 4 (Winter 2007) Article 4 Law and Feminism Guest Editor: Mary Jane Mossman Counting Outsiders: A Critical Exploration of Outsider Course Enrollment in Canadian Legal Education Natasha Bakht Kim Brooks Gillian Calder Jennifer Koshan Sonia Lawrence Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Part of the Legal Education Commons Special Issue Article Citation Information Bakht, Natasha; Brooks, Kim; Calder, Gillian; Koshan, Jennifer; Lawrence, Sonia; Mathen, Carissima; and Parkes, Debra. "Counting Outsiders: A Critical Exploration of Outsider Course Enrollment in Canadian Legal Education." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 45.4 (2007) : 667-732. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol45/iss4/4 This Special Issue Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. Counting Outsiders: A Critical Exploration of Outsider Course Enrollment in Canadian Legal Education Abstract In response to anecdotal concerns that student enrollment in "outsider" courses, and in particular feminist courses, is on the decline in Canadian law schools, the authors explore patterns of course enrollment at seven Canadian law schools. Articulating a definition of "outsider" that describes those who are members of groups historically lacking power in society, or traditionally outside the realms of fashioning, teaching, and adjudicating the law, the authors document the results of quantitative and qualitative surveys conducted at their respective schools to argue that outsider pedagogy remains a critical component of legal education.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Impacts: the Reliance on Hair Testing in Child Protection Report of the Motherisk Commission the Honourable Judith C
    Harmful Impacts: The Reliance on Hair Testing in Child Protection Report of the Motherisk Commission The Honourable Judith C. Beaman Commissioner February 2018 This Report is available at Motherisk Commission (https://motheriskcommission.ca). © 2018 Ministry of the Attorney General ISBN 978-1-4868-1372-8. Print. [English]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1378-0. Print. [Cree]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1373-5. PDF. [English]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1379-7. PDF. [Cree]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1374-2. Print. [French]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1380-3. Print. [Oji-Cree]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1375-9. PDF. [French]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1381-0. PDF. [Oji-Cree]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1376-6. Print. [Mohawk]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1382-7. Print. [Ojibway]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1377-3. PDF. [Mohawk]. ISBN 978-1-4868-1383-4. PDF. [Ojibway]. |2| Harmful Impacts: The Reliance on Hair Testing in Child Protection Report of the Motherisk Commission To recognize the broad harm caused by the unreliable Motherisk hair testing, the Commission considered “affected persons” to include children, siblings, biological parents, adoptive parents, foster parents, extended families, and the bands or communities of Indigenous children. This Report is dedicated to everyone who was affected by the testing. February 26, 2018 The Honourable Yasir Naqvi Attorney General of Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General McMurtry-Scott Building 720 Bay Street, 11th Floor Toronto, ON M7A 2S9 Re: Motherisk Commission Dear Minister: With this letter, I am delivering the Report of the Motherisk Commission, Harmful Impacts: The Reliance on Hair Testing in Child Protection. Establishing the Motherisk Commission served as public acknowledgement that the unreliable hair testing by the Motherisk Drug Testing Laboratory deeply affected Ontario families.
    [Show full text]
  • 2426Y-Osgoode AR 05/06 REV4
    ANNUAL REPORT ACADEMIC YEAR 2005-2006 osgoode OFFICE OF THE DEAN Office of the Dean Osgoode Hall Law School of York University 4700 Keele Street Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3 Tel: 416-736-5199 Fax: 416-736-5251 E-mail: [email protected] www.osgoode.yorku.ca 2005-2006 Officers Dean Patrick J. Monahan BA (Ottawa), MA (Carleton), LLB (Osgoode), LLM (Harvard), of the Bar of Ontario Associate Dean Until December 2005 Our mission is to contribute to new knowledge about the Janet Walker BA Hons , MA (York), LLB (Osgoode), Dphil (Oxon), of the Bar of Ontario law and the legal system by being a centre for thoughtful Associate Dean and creative legal scholarship, to provide an outstanding From January 2006 professional and liberal education to our students so that Robert Wai they can assume positions of leadership in the legal BCom (McGill), MPhil (Oxford), LLB (British Columbia), SJD (Harvard), of the Bars of British Columbia and New York profession, among legal academics and in all aspects of Associate Dean, Research and Graduate Studies public life, and to serve Canadian society and the world in Allan C. Hutchinson ways that further social justice. LLM (Manchester), LLD (Manchester), Barrister of Gray’s Inn, and of the Bar of Ontario Assistant Dean, First Year Per jus ad justitiam: Through law to justice Colleen M. Hanycz BA (Toronto), LLB (Dalhousie), LLM (Osgoode), PhD (Osgoode) Assistant Dean, Student Services Gina Alexandris LLB (Osgoode) Chief Law Librarian Nicholas Pengelley BA (LS) (South Australian Institute of Technology), DipL (Barristers Admission Board, Supreme Court of New South Wales), LLM (Monash University), PhD (Monash University) Executive Officer Richard Ooi BAS Hons Marketing (York) Director, Office of Advancement Anita Herrmann BA Hons History (York) Director, Osgoode Professional Development Victoria Watkins BSc (Toronto), LLB (Toronto) Director, Information Technology Services Kurt Binnie BA Hons (York) Executive Assistant to the Dean Mya Bulwa BA (Western), LLB (Osgoode) Table of Contents Introduction .
    [Show full text]
  • York University Board of Governors Notice of Meeting Tuesday, May 1, 2018, 1:30 to 4:30 Pm 5Th Floor, Kaneff Tower, Keele Campus
    York University Board of Governors Notice of Meeting Tuesday, May 1, 2018, 1:30 to 4:30 pm 5th Floor, Kaneff Tower, Keele Campus PAGE I. CLOSED SESSION II. OPEN SESSION – 2:00 pm approximately Chair’s Items (R. Waugh) Report on Items Decided in the Closed Session Consent Agenda approval Executive Committee (R. Waugh) 2:05 pm President’s Items (R. Lenton) 2:15 pm Kudos Report ............................................................................................................... 1 Strategic Research Plan Presentation (R. Haché) Academic Resources (H. Wu) 3:00 pm External Relations (J. Lassonde) 3:10 pm Policy on the Acceptance of Gifts to the University: Amended (For approval) ............ 8 Finance and Audit Committee (W. Hatanaka) 3:25 pm Capital Projects (For approval) i. Osgoode Professional Development Site Project Budget Adjustment ................ 16 ii. Lassonde School of Engineering, Capacity Expansion Project Budget .............. 21 iii. Lease of Space at 4747 Keele Street .................................................................. 23 New Leased Space for the Lassonde School of Engineering Renewal of Leased Space for the Finance Division iv. School of Continuing Studies Building: Budget Adjustment .............................. 25 v. Atkinson Building Renovations: Phase II Budget ................................................ 27 Governance and Human Resources Committee (D. McFadden) 3:45 pm Honorary Governors: Guidelines and Criteria (For approval) ................................ 29 Investment Committee (R.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 January 2017 31 Janvier 2017 the Honourable Ahmed D. Hussen L'honorable Ahmed D. Hussen Minister of Immigration, Refugees
    31 January 2017 31 janvier 2017 The Honourable Ahmed D. Hussen L’Honorable Ahmed D. Hussen Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Ministre de l’Immigration, des Réfugiés et de la Citizenship Citoyenneté 365 Laurier Avenue West 365, avenue Laurier Ouest Ottawa, Ontario (K1A 1L1) Ottawa (Ontario) K1A 1L1 CC: c. c. The Right Honorable Justin Trudeau Le très honorable Justin Trudeau Prime Minister of Canada Premier ministre du Canada The Honourable Serge Cormier L’Honorable Serge Cormier Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Secrétaire parlementaire du ministre de Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship l'Immigration, des Réfugiés et de la Citoyenneté Re: Suspending Safe Third Country Agreement Objet : Suspension de l’Entente sur les tiers pays sûrs Dear Minister Hussen / Cher Monsieur le Ministre Hussen, We, the undersigned law professors, call on the Canadian government to immediately suspend directing back refugee claimants at the Canada-US border under the Safe Third Country Agreement. Canada's immigration legislation indicates that, in determining whether a country should be designated as "safe" for refugees, consideration must be given to the country's human rights record and to whether the country complies with the 1951 Refugee Convention and the Convention against Torture. Executive orders issued by President Trump demonstrate that the US is not "safe" for refugees. These include a ban on Syrian refugees and a bar on entry of nationals of seven mostly Muslim countries. It is also evident that administration of the executive orders through border enforcement has been chaotic, inconsistent and arbitrary. This exposes refugees to yet more risk. Additional statements issued by the President also indicate that the US is not "safe", including his call for a ban on entry for all Muslims and his suggestion that he is open to considering the use of torture.
    [Show full text]
  • Campus Directory
    YORK UNIVERSITY KEELE CAMPUS BLACK & WHITE 100 DÎNER DE RÉSEAUTAGE (JEUDI), 100 - ENTRÉE À LA STATION DE MÉTRO SÉANCES DU COLLOQUE AUTRES OPTIONS POUR MANGER LES ÉVÉNEMENTS SOCIAUX EN SOIRÉE SUBWAY TTC "YORK UNIVERSITY" 60 Physical Resources Building PRB B9 PARKING GARAGES – VISITORS VISUAL PERFORMANCE ARTS FACILITIES CAMPUS DIRECTORY 28 Ross Building R D5 80 Arboretum Lane Parking Garage ARB D4 92 Art Gallery of York University ACE E7 x ACADEMIC, ADMINISTRATIVE & 25 Scott Library SCL D4 84 Student Services Parking Garage SSP E7 37 Burton Auditorium BU E6 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 27 Scott Religious Centre, CSQ SRC D5 72 York Lanes Parking Garage YLP D6 93 Gales Gallery ACW E6 59 190 Albany Road ALB A8 42 Seymour Schulich Building SSB E7 38 Joseph G. Green Studio Theatre CFT E6 92 Accolade East ACE E7 2 Sherman Health Science SHR B2 PARKING LOTS – VISITORS 92 McLean Performance Studio ACE E7 93 Accolade West ACW E6 Research Centre 83 Atkinson Lot E5 92 Price Family Cinema ACE E7 33 Atkinson ATK E5 18 Steacie Science STL D4 66 Founders Road East Lot A6 92 Sandra Faire ACE E7 29 Behavioural Science BSB D5 & Engineering Library 87 Kinsmen Lot B9 & Ivan Fecan Theatre 41 Bennett Centre for BCS E7 22 Stedman Lecture Halls SLH D6 64 Northwest Gate Lot B4 92 Tribute Communities ACE E7 Student Services, Admissions 13 Stong College SC D3 89 Physical Resources Building C9 Recital Hall 81 Bergeron Centre for BRG E4 23 Student Centre STC D6 South Visitor Lot Engineering Excellence 4 Tait McKencie Centre TM C3 77 Tait McKenzie Lot C3 SPORT & RECREATION FACILITIES
    [Show full text]
  • Derek Mckee Faculté De Droit, Université De Montréal Pavillon Maximilien-Caron C.P
    Derek McKee Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal Pavillon Maximilien-Caron C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7 (514) 343-2329 [email protected] I. BACKGROUND Academic and Professional Appointments 2018–present Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal Associate Professor (2018) 2012–2018 Faculté de droit, Université de Sherbrooke Associate Professor (2018) Assistant Professor (2013–2018) Director of programs in Common Law and Transnational Law (2014–2018) 2006–2007 Supreme Court of Canada Law Clerk to Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin Education 2007–2013 University of Toronto, Faculty of Law Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D.) • Dissertation: “Internationalism and Global Governance in Canadian Public Law” • Supervisor: Prof. Kerry Rittich • SSHRC Canada Graduate Scholarship, 2008–2011 ($105,000) • Ontario Graduate Scholarship, 2007–2008 ($15,000) • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Doctoral Scholarship, 2007–2008 ($9,000) 2002–2006 McGill University, Faculty of Law Bachelor of Civil Laws/Bachelor of Laws (B.C.L./LL.B.) • Dean’s Honour List • Joseph Cohen, Q.C. Award, 2006 (shared) • Montreal Bar Association Prize for highest standing in Civil Procedure, 2006 • Daniel Mettarlin Memorial Scholarship for academic achievement and demonstrated interest in public interest advocacy, 2005 (shared) • Harry Batshaw prize for the best result in the course “Foundations of Canadian Law,” 2003 • English Editorial Board, McGill Law Journal, 2003–2005 1993–1998 Harvard University Bachelor of Arts magna cum laude PROF. DEREK MCKEE – CURRICULUM VITAE – UPDATED NOVEMBER 2018 1 • Joint concentration in Visual and Environmental Studies and Anthropology • Senior thesis: “Darshan in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” Professional credentials Law Society of Ontario (called to the bar 2007) Languages English (native speaker), French (fluent), German (intermediate) II.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Board / Comité De Rédaction Advisory Board / Comité Consultatif
    Editorial Board / Comité de rédaction Editor-in-Chief Rédacteur en chef Robert S. Schwartzwald, University of Massachusetts, U.S.A. Associate Editors Rédacteurs adjoints Caroline Andrew, Université d’Ottawa / University of Ottawa, Canada Coral Ann Howells, University of Reading, United Kingdom Daniel Salée, Concordia University, Canada Managing Editor Secrétaire de rédaction Guy Leclair, ICCS/CIEC, Ottawa, Canada Advisory Board / Comité consultatif Maria Cristina Rosas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico Giovanni Dotoli, Université de Bari, Italie Saturo Osanai, Chuo University, Japan Jacques Leclaire, Université de Rouen, France Bernd Dietz, Cordoba University, Spain Vadim Koleneko, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia Michael Behiels, University of Ottawa, Canada Maria Bernadette Veloso Porto, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Brésil Wolfgang Kloos, Universität Trier, Germany Myungsoon Shin, Yonsei University, Korea Wilfredo Angulo Baudin, Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Liberator, Venezuela Coomi Vevaina, University of Bombay, India Helen O’Neill, University College Dublin, Ireland Jane Moss, Romance Languages, Colby College, U.S. Jiaheng Song, Université de Shantong, Chine Malcolm Alexander, Griffith University, Australia Ines Molinaro, University of Cambridge, U.K. Therese Malachy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israël Erling Lindström, Uppsala University, Sweden Leen d’Haenens, University of Nijmegen, Les Pays-Bas The International Journal of Canadian Paraissant deux fois l’an, la Revue Studies (IJCS) is published twice a year internationale d’études canadiennes by the International Council for (RIÉC) est publiée par le Conseil Canadian Studies. Multidisciplinary in international d’études canadiennes. scope, the IJCS is intended for people Revue multidisciplinaire, elle rejoint les around the world who are interested in the lecteurs de divers pays intéressés à l’étude study of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • John Borrows Curriculum Vitae
    JOHN BORROWS CURRICULUM VITAE FULL TIME ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS University of Victoria, Law School Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Law, 2014-present Law Foundation Professor in Aboriginal Justice, (tenured) Faculty of Law, 2001-2011 University of Minnesota, Law School Professor & Robina Chair in Law, Public Policy and Society, Law School, 2009 -2014 University of Toronto, Law School Associate Professor (tenured), Faculty of Law, 1998-2001 University of British Columbia, Law School Assistant Professor, 1992 – 1994, Associate Professor, (tenured) 1996 - 1998 Osgoode Hall Law School, York University Assistant Professor 1994-1996 VISITING ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Indigenous Scholar in Residence, 2017; Senior Fellow, 2018-present McGill University, Tomlinson Distinguished Visiting Professor, 2017-2018 Nexen Chair in Indigenous Leadership, Banff Centre for Arts & Creativity, Alberta 2015-present Beedie School of Business, Simon Fraser University, Visiting Professor, 2014-present Princeton University, L.G. Pathy Visiting Professor in Canadian Studies, Winter 2011 Brigham Young University, J. Rueben Clark Law School, Visiting Professor, Fall 2007 University of Waikato Law School, New Zealand Law Foundation Distinguished Visitor, 2006 University of New South Wales, Faculty of Law, Visiting Professor, 2004 (Jan.-June) Arizona State University, College of Law, Visiting Professor, 2000-2001, Acting Executive Director, Indian Legal Program 1 DEGREES D.H.L University of Toronto, Victoria University (October 2019) Hons. LL.D. Dalhousie University (May 2014) Hons. Law Society of Upper Canada (June 2017) Osgoode Hall Law School at York University (June 2018) Queens University (November 2019) Simon Fraser University (June 2020) Ph.D. Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, 1994 LL.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Derek Mckee Faculté De Droit, Université De Montréal Pavillon Maximilien-Caron C.P
    Derek McKee Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal Pavillon Maximilien-Caron C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7 (514) 343-2329 [email protected] I. BACKGROUND Academic and Professional Appointments 2018– Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal Associate Professor 2012–2018 Faculté de droit, Université de Sherbrooke Associate Professor (2018) Assistant Professor (2013–2018) Professor chargé d’enseignement (2012–2013) 2006–2007 Supreme Court of Canada Law Clerk to Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin Education 2007–2013 University of Toronto, Faculty of Law Doctor of Juridical Science (S.J.D.) Dissertation: “Internationalism and Global Governance in Canadian Public Law” Supervisor: Prof. Kerry Rittich SSHRC Canada Graduate Scholarship, 2008–2011 ($105,000) Ontario Graduate Scholarship, 2007–2008 ($15,000) University of Toronto Faculty of Law Doctoral Scholarship, 2007–2008 ($9,000) 2002–2006 McGill University, Faculty of Law Bachelor of Civil Laws/Bachelor of Laws (B.C.L./LL.B.) Dean’s Honour List Joseph Cohen, Q.C. Award, 2006 (shared) Montreal Bar Association Prize for highest standing in Civil Procedure, 2006 Daniel Mettarlin Memorial Scholarship for academic achievement and demonstrated interest in public interest advocacy, 2005 (shared) Harry Batshaw prize for the best result in the course “Foundations of Canadian Law,” 2003 English Editorial Board, McGill Law Journal, 2003–2005 1993–1998 Harvard University Bachelor of Arts magna cum laude Joint concentration in Visual and Environmental Studies and Anthropology Senior thesis: “Darshan in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction” PROF. DEREK MCKEE – CURRICULUM VITAE – UPDATED NOVEMBER 2019 1 Professional credentials Law Society of Ontario (called to the bar 2007) Languages English (native speaker), French (fluent), German (intermediate) II.
    [Show full text]