DOCSLIB.ORG

Women and the American Revolution Discussion (March 1998)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Women and the American Revolution Discussion (March 1998) H-Women Women and the American Revolution Discussion (March 1998) Page published by Kolt Ewing on Thursday, June 12, 2014 Women and the American Revolution Discussion (March 1998) Query From Mary Furbee [email protected] 03 March 1998 For those with appropriate interest and expertise: I'd be curious to know which women of the American Revolution (Top 5?), you consider the most "historically significant." Very subjective, that word important...I'd appreciate your thoughts. [Ed. Note: See also Women and the American Revolution H-Net WWW Site Disc/ Nov 1997 on the H- women website: http://lists.h-net.org/~women] Responses: From Lisa Connelly Cook [email protected] 08 March 1998 Important Woman of the American Revolution: Mercy Otis Warren (1728-1814), wrote satirical plays, corresponded with important men and women of the day, published anti-federalist arguments against ratification of the Constitution, and published a three volume history of the revolution at the age of 77. She justified a woman's entering the world of politics (even if anonymously and privately!) as an extension of religious virtue, arguing that if it was good for a woman to join in discussions of religious principles, it was good for a woman to join in discussions of politics, since, as she saw it, religious principles were the foundation of politics. Guess she was a little disappointed in the way things turned out after the Revolution. From Linda Grant De Pauw MinervaCen [email protected] 08 March 1998 Margaret Kemble Gage, American wife of the military governor of Boston and Patriot informer, who told of the plan to attack Concord in April 1775 and was then banished to England. Peggy Shippen Arnold who turned the loyalty of her husband Benedict Arnold, perhaps the greatest general of the early years of the war, convincing him to betray the American cause. Mary Brant for her influence in the Iroquois confederacy which kept the western tribes loyal to Citation: Kolt Ewing. Women and the American Revolution Discussion (March 1998). H-Women. 07-20-2015. https://networks.h-net.org/node/24029/pages/31444/women-and-american-revolution-discussion-march-1998 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 1 H-Women George III. A British agent said of her "one word from her goes farther with them [the Iroquois] than a thousand from any white man without exception." Mercy Otis Warren, for her political activism from the first meetings of the Committee of Correspondence, which met in her home, through her authorship of a multi-volume history of the Revolution giving an insider's view. Mary Ludwig Hays McCauley, a soldier's widow buried in an unmarked grave, who in 1876 was claimed as the true incarnation of the legendary heroine Molly Pitcher who was said to have relieved her husband at an artillery position at the Battle of Monmouth. Proving that myth is more powerful than history, this woman, reinterred beneath a monument in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, is the best known female military figure in American history. Her actual service during the Revolution is not documented -- her obituary said nothing about Monmouth or a cannon. The only surviving contemporary evidence -- an 1822 news story --said she wore male clothing and was wounded at the Battle of Brandywine. From Mary Furbee <[email protected]> 08 March 1998 RE [Mary Beth Norton's [email protected]] >>>Significant at the time? or significant later? >That is, Deborah Sampson Gannett (who disguised herself as a man & >enlisted in the army & later made a living as a lecturer discussing her >experiences) was actually rather unimportant during the war but became an important >icon & cultural bellwether later. So too women who kept diaries during the >war were certainly not prominent at the time but those diaries have been very >important to historians--I refer here, most notably, to three >Philadelphians: Elizabeth Drinker, Sarah (Sally) Logan Fisher, and Grace >Growden Galloway. > >As for important during the Rev itself, I'd list 3 most prominently: > >Mercy Otis Warren: for her prev-rev. pamphlets and later her HISTORY (the >first written by a woman & one of the first histories of the Rev) > >Esther DeBerdt Reed: for organizing the Philadelphia Ladies Assn in the >summer of 1780 (and trying to form a nationwide organization), the first >formal large scale secular organization of American women for a political >purpose and >Abigail Adams: for her remarkable correspondence and perceptive, >forward-looking interpretation of events and insistence that women be >included in the revolutionary project. Greetings: I've read Liberty's Daughter and your other books, and they've been very helpful to me. It's great to hear your thoughts. Yes, I meant during the Revolution itself, as opposed to important to historians. I haven't heard, by the way, of Sally Fisher. I teach journalism at West Virginia University (writing) and write nonfiction for adults and children. I'm working on a children's book about the Revolutionary period; hence my query. The publisher I'm working with wants me to dwell on Citation: Kolt Ewing. Women and the American Revolution Discussion (March 1998). H-Women. 07-20-2015. https://networks.h-net.org/node/24029/pages/31444/women-and-american-revolution-discussion-march-1998 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 2 H-Women "mostly well-known, but also historically important, women." However, I find many of the lesser-known women (Sarah Bache, Penelope Barker, Mary Brant, Elizabeth Drinker and a host of others) more interesting and important than more well-known women (M. Washington, Betsy Ross, Captain Molly). So determining who to focus on (yet please this publisher) has been a real challenge. The three women in your second list -- Abigail Adams, Mercy Warren and Esther DeBerdt Reed -- are in my top five list, as well. The first two were givens, but Reed was harder to decide about. So I find it interesting you included her. Also, it's harder to find biographical information on her --from her childhood and pre-Association/Revolution years. Of course, I've just begun looking. Citation: Kolt Ewing. Women and the American Revolution Discussion (March 1998). H-Women. 07-20-2015. https://networks.h-net.org/node/24029/pages/31444/women-and-american-revolution-discussion-march-1998 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Camp Followers, Nurses, Soldiers, and Spies: Women and the Modern Memory of the Revolutionary War
    History in the Making Volume 9 Article 5 January 2016 Camp Followers, Nurses, Soldiers, and Spies: Women and the Modern Memory of the Revolutionary War Heather K. Garrett CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making Part of the United States History Commons, and the Women's History Commons Recommended Citation Garrett, Heather K. (2016) "Camp Followers, Nurses, Soldiers, and Spies: Women and the Modern Memory of the Revolutionary War," History in the Making: Vol. 9 , Article 5. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making/vol9/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in History in the Making by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Articles Camp Followers, Nurses, Soldiers, and Spies: Women and the Modern Memory of the Revolutionary War By Heather K. Garrett Abstract: When asked of their memory of the American Revolution, most would reference George Washington or Paul Revere, but probably not Molly Pitcher, Lydia Darragh, or Deborah Sampson. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate not only the lack of inclusivity of women in the memory of the Revolutionary War, but also why the women that did achieve recognition surpassed the rest. Women contributed to the war effort in multiple ways, including serving as cooks, laundresses, nurses, spies, and even as soldiers on the battlefields. Unfortunately, due to the large number of female participants, it would be impossible to include the narratives of all of the women involved in the war.
    [Show full text]
  • The Female Review
    The Female Review wife and children; soon after, mother Deborah Bradford Sampson The Female Review (1797) put five-year-old Deborah out to service in various Massachusetts Herman Mann households. An indentured servant until age eighteen, Sampson, now a “masterless woman,” became a weaver (“one of the very few androgynous trades in New England,” notes biographer Text prepared by Ed White (Tulane University) and Duncan Faherty (Queens College and the CUNY Graduate Center). We want to thank Paul Erickson and Alfred Young [40]), then a rural schoolteacher, then, near age the American Antiquarian Society for their tremendous support, and Jodi twenty-one, a soldier in the Continental Army (37). Donning Schorb (University of Florida) for contributing the following introduction. men’s clothes (not for the first time, as it turns out) and adopting the generic name “Robert Shurtliff,” the soldier fought in several skirmishes, suffered battle injuries (to either the groin or upper Mann Seeking Woman: body), and was eventually promoted to serving as “waiter” (an Reading The Female Review officer’s orderly) to brigadier general John Paterson. Sampson’s military career has been most carefully Jodi Schorb reconstructed by Alfred F. Young in Masquerade: The Life and Times of Deborah Sampson, Continental Soldier. Although The Female Review In the wake of the American Revolution and beyond, claims Sampson/Shurtliff enlisted in 1781 and fought at the Battle Deborah Sampson was both celebrity and enigma, capturing the of Yorktown (September-October, 1781), Sampson/Shurtliff 1 imagination of a nation that had successfully won their actually served in the Continental Army from May, 1782 until independence from England.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgender, and Queer History Is a Publication of the National Park Foundation and the National Park Service
    Published online 2016 www.nps.gov/subjects/tellingallamericansstories/lgbtqthemestudy.htm LGBTQ America: A Theme Study of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer History is a publication of the National Park Foundation and the National Park Service. We are very grateful for the generous support of the Gill Foundation, which has made this publication possible. The views and conclusions contained in the essays are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. © 2016 National Park Foundation Washington, DC All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reprinted or reproduced without permission from the publishers. Links (URLs) to websites referenced in this document were accurate at the time of publication. INCLUSIVE STORIES Although scholars of LGBTQ history have generally been inclusive of women, the working classes, and gender-nonconforming people, the narrative that is found in mainstream media and that many people think of when they think of LGBTQ history is overwhelmingly white, middle-class, male, and has been focused on urban communities. While these are important histories, they do not present a full picture of LGBTQ history. To include other communities, we asked the authors to look beyond the more well-known stories. Inclusion within each chapter, however, isn’t enough to describe the geographic, economic, legal, and other cultural factors that shaped these diverse histories. Therefore, we commissioned chapters providing broad historical contexts for two spirit, transgender, Latino/a, African American Pacific Islander, and bisexual communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Deborah Sampson Gannett (1760 – 1827)
    Deborah Sampson Gannett (1760 – 1827) A Local Guide Sharon Public Library 11 North Main Street Sharon, MA 02067 (781) 784-1578 sharonpubliclibrary.org About Deborah Deborah Sampson was born on December 17, 1760 in Plympton, MA to Jonathan and Deborah Sampson. An impoverished family, the Sampsons had 7 children. Deborah’s father, Jonathan, abandoned the family. Deborah worked as an indentured servant, then as a teacher. Physically, she is described as being tall, strong, and agile but plain, with brown hair and eyes. She was intelligent, with a strong knowledge of politics, theology, and war. In 1782, Deborah enlisted in the 4th Massachusetts Regiment under the name Robert Shurtlieff. She saw action in New York against Loyalists and Native Americans. That same year, she was injured in Tarrytown, but escaped discovery by removing a musket ball from her own leg. In 1793, she contracted brain fever in Philadelphia; Dr Barnabas Binney discovered that she was a woman. Though he did not expose her, he did make arrangements for her discharge. As a result, she was honorably discharged in October 1783. While Deborah was away at war, she was expelled from her Baptist congregation for dressing in men’s clothing and enlisting as a soldier. After her discharge, Deborah moved in with her aunt, Alice Walker, in Stoughton. She continued to dress as a man, passing herself off as her “brother, Ephraim,” until she met local farmer Benjamin Gannet. The two married in April 1785 and raised four children: three of their own (Earl Bradford, Mary, and Patience) and one adopted child (Susanna Shepard, a local orphan).
    [Show full text]
  • Deborah Sampson and the Legacy of Herman Mann's the Female Review Judith Hiltner
    "The Example of our Heroine": Deborah Sampson and the Legacy of Herman Mann's The Female Review Judith Hiltner Since its first publication in 1797, Herman Mann's The Female Review has been the primary source for information about the childhood and military career of Deborah Sampson, who served for eighteen months in the Continental Army during the American Revolution disguised as a male. Bolstered in part by Mann' s publication of her career, Sampson won some recognition in her lifetime as a pioneering female soldier and public speaker, and has been honored in the twentieth century as namesake for a Liberty Ship (1944), and as Massachusetts State Heroine (1982). But the most substantial legacy of Mann's appropriation of Sampson's career has been its generation of a two-hundred-year Deborah Sampson print industry. Edited and reprinted repeatedly in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in lieu of any definitive account of her life, Mann's 1797 "memoirs," along with his and his nineteenth-century editors' subsequent revi­ sions of her story, have been tapped, selectively and frequently, to tailor a Sampson designed to accommodate a range of competing cultural projects.1 This essay traces Mann's initial project to make of Deborah Sampson a chaste Minerva—a "genteel" and nonthreatening Amazon tailored to embody early national ideology. I show that his 1797 Sampson was a textual creation, with merely a contingent relation to the actual Middleboro, Massachusetts, woman who enlisted for unknown reasons near the end of the Revolutionary War. He shaped Sampson into an icon of "male" patriotism and "female" chastity, responding to his culture's longing for a more androgynous model of early American character.2 As Republican newspaper editor Mann regarded himself as a crucial cultural voice promulgating, among other agendas, the acceptable limits 0026-3079/2000/4101-093$2.50/0 American Studies, 41:1 (Spring 2000): 93-113 93 94 Judith Hiltner for female energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Was a Combat Solider in the American Revolution by Norman Dasinger, Jr., July 21, 2020 Blueandgrayeducation.Org
    He (She) was a Combat Solider in the American Revolution By Norman Dasinger, Jr., July 21, 2020 blueandgrayeducation.org Deborah Sampson | Massachusetts Historical Society Meet Robert Shirtliff, an enlisted man, I mean woman, who served in the 4th Massachusetts Regiment beginning in May 1782. Keep in mind, this was an elite unit that had seen combat at Bunker Hill, Trenton, Princeton, Saratoga, and Monmouth. Shirtfliff’s real name was Deborah Sampson. She was born in 1760 in Plympton, Massachusetts. Her father abandoned the family, and Deborah eventually was sent to live with Mary Prince Thatcher, who taught the youngster to read and write. But when the elderly lady died, Deborah became an indentured servant to the Jeremiah Thomas family in Middleborough, Massachusetts, until her 18th birthday. At that time, she became a teacher and accomplished woodworker and mechanical tradeswoman making baskets, milking stools, winter sleds, weather vanes, spools for thread, weaving quills, and pie crimpers, all of which she sold door to door. Being nearly 6 feet tall (average height for women was 5 feet and men 5 feet 6 inches) and gifted with strength, stamina, and dexterity, she decided in January 1782 to rename herself “Robert Shirtliff” and join the Army. At first unsuccessful due to being recognized by the recruiter and some other locals, she was forced to travel to another town where the 4th Massachusetts happened to be recruiting, but only for those who met its unique criteria. In fact, this being an elite unit, Sampson’s disguise was more likely to succeed, since no one would expect to find a woman among soldiers who were specially chosen for their above-average size and superior physical ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina James Matthew Am C Donald Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2006 Politics of the personal in the old north state: Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina James Matthew aM c Donald Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Mac Donald, James Matthew, "Politics of the personal in the old north state: Griffith Rutherford in Revolutionary North Carolina" (2006). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3625. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3625 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. POLITICS OF THE PERSONAL IN THE OLD NORTH STATE: GRIFFITH RUTHERFORD IN REVOLUTIONARY NORTH CAROLINA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of History By James M. Mac Donald B.A., University of Delaware, 1995 M.A., Appalachian State University, 1997 May, 2006 To My Parents ii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my committee for their support and suggestions during the writing of my dissertation. As a student, I had the good fortune of taking seminars with each member beginning with my first graduate class at LSU. Mark Thompson became director late in the course of the project and generously agreed to chair the committee during the last semester.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography Activity: Deborah Sampson Gannett
    NAME _______________________________________________ CLASS ___________________ DATE _________________ BIOGRAPHY Deborah Sampson Gannett General George Washington had great difficulty raising enough recruits to fill the ranks of the Continental Army, but one healthy, young Massachusetts native was eager to sign up. The only problem was, she was a woman, and women could not serve as soldiers in colonial America. As you read the passage below, think about all the ways that Deborah Sampson defied the social conventions of her times. Deborah Sampson was descended from hardy ball wound in her thigh. Bleeding heavily, she and illustrious stock. The blood of Pilgrims John was taken to a hospital. To avoid being found out Alden, Miles Standish, and William Bradford as a woman, she convinced the doctors that she flowed in her veins. Yet her father was unable to had only been grazed on the leg. Then, in secret, earn a living and deserted the family shortly after she extracted the musket ball herself and soon her birth in 1760. Unable to support her children, rejoined her unit. The following year, Deborah’s Deborah’s mother had to send them to live with unit was stationed in Philadelphia, where she other families. Deborah changed homes frequently, contracted a deadly fever and was hospitalized. and her troubled childhood had made her highly This time, her doctor discovered she was a self-reliant. Finally, at age 10, she was bound out woman, but agreed to keep her secret. He sent her as a servant to a kindly church deacon. to his own home to recover. There she performed such “unladylike” With the signing of the peace treaty ending tasks as plowing fields, spreading fertilizer, and the War for Independence, she was ordered back carpentry.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 6, Issue 1
    TILTON LIBRARY NEWSLETTER Volume 6, Issue 1 Spring 2013 Pi - Pie Day Meet Our Volunteer Name: Les Thomas Help us celebrate the mathematical constant Π on th Hometown: Deerfield, but originally from Biddeford, Thursday, March 14 . We’ll be serving pie and Maine at what is now the site of the University of New solving math problems from 2-5. If you love to England, located at the mouth of the Saco River. bake, feel free to bring your favorite pie to share. Family: Married Jean Fessenden, a classmate at Bates, Author Visit – David Gillham class of 1940. We had two children, Peter who lives in Tilton Library’s Third Thursday Book Discussion Vermont and my youngest son, Paul, who died in1981. I group is reading David R. Gillham’s City of have two grandchildren and one great grandchild. Women for its March title. Author David R. Job: I taught English at Biddeford High School until I Gillham has graciously agreed to visit on Thursday, came to Frontier Regional High School in 1956. After March 21st at 7:00. Join us at 6:30 as we gather our twelve years there I taught at Amherst Senior and Junior thoughts about the book or come at 7:00 to meet High Schools and then retired in 1979. the author. Reserve your library copy online or at Most memorable book: My grandmother turned me the adult circulation desk. To order a book for loose in her library with Gibbon’s History of Rome – I purchase and signing please contact the library by started early near a bookshelf and never got too far away.
    [Show full text]
  • PHILADELPHIA WOMEN and the PUBLIC SPHERE, 1760S-1840S
    “THE YOUNG WOMEN HERE ENJOY A LIBERTY”: PHILADELPHIA WOMEN AND THE PUBLIC SPHERE, 1760s-1840s By KATHARINE DIANE LEE A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History Written under the direction of Nancy Hewitt and Paul G. E. Clemens And approved by _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May 2016 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION “The Young women here enjoy a liberty”: Philadelphia Women and the Public Sphere, 1760s-1840s by KATHARINE DIANE LEE Dissertation Director: Nancy Hewitt This dissertation examines women’s access to and participation in the community life of Philadelphia in the decades surrounding the American Revolution. It argues against the application of separate spheres to late-colonial and early national Philadelphia and proposes that women were heavily integrated into nearly all aspects of the city’s public life. Women from diverse backgrounds were actively involved in commerce, politics, protest, intellectual and legal debates, social institutions, wartime developments, educational advancements, and benevolent causes. They saw themselves and were viewed by their peers as valuable members of a vibrant and complex city life. If we put aside assumptions about women’s limited relationship to the public sphere, we find a society in which women took advantage of a multitude of opportunities for participation and self-expression. This project also examines the disparity between the image of the ideal housewife and the lived experience of the majority of female Philadelphians. Idealized descriptions of Revolutionary women present a far more sheltered range of options than those taken advantage of by most actual women.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and the American Revolution (2020)
    The Varieties of Political Experience: Women and the American Revolution Presented to the faculty of Lycoming College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Joanne and Arthur Haberberger Fellowship By Erin Emerick Lycoming College May 3, 2020 Approved by: ____________________________________________Dr. Christopher Pearl ____________________________________________Dr. Laura Seddelmeyer ____________________________________________Dr. Ryan Adams ____________________________________________Dr. Jessica Munson Introduction Early in the spring of 1776, as tension between the American colonies and the British government was at its peak, there was a disturbance in the town of Stratford, Connecticut. One of the women had just given birth to a son and she had decided to name him Thomas Gage after the former commander of the British army. As news of the birth spread through the town, some of the patriotic townswomen became upset, and quickly decided to band together to punish the Loyalist mother.1 Nearly 200 women “formed themselves into a battalion, and with solemn ceremony appointed a general and other officers to lead them on.” After forming their ranks, the women “then marched in the greatest good order to pay their compliments to Thomas Gage, and present his mother with a suit of tar and feathers.”2 Only the pleas of the woman’s husband prevented this female militia from accomplishing their task.3 These New England women chose to take violent action, expressing their political identities in a public way. However, this overt political expression was not the only way that women expressed their political ideas during the American Revolution. During the war for independence, patriot women expressed themselves politically on the homefront, as well as on the battlefield, in a variety of ways.
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the Status of Women in the United States Social Studies Standards
    Where are the Women? A Report on the Status of Women in the United States Social Studies Standards By National Women’s History Museum www.WomensHistory.org Report By: Elizabeth L. Maurer, Director of Program Jeanette Patrick, Project Director Liesle M. Britto, Editorial Assistant Henry Millar, Editorial Assistant Museum Advisory Council Dr. Catherine Allgor, Chair Nancy Hayward Massachusetts Historical Society Former Director of School Programs George Washington’s Mount Vernon Dr. Franky Abbott The Digital Public Library Fath Davis Ruffin Smithsonian National Museum of American Dr. Carol Berkin History Baruch College, The City University of New York Dr. Katrin Schultheiss Audrey Davis George Washington University Alexandria Black History Museum Dr. Marjorie Spruill Dr. Julie Des Jardins University of South Carolina Independent Scholar Jennifer Thomas Dr. Laura Edwards Virginia Association of Museums Duke University Jill Tietjen Dr. Cathy Gorn Former Director National History Day National Women’s Hall of Fame Kristina Graves Dr. William White Clayton County Public Schools Retired Director of Educational Program Development Colonial Williamsburg Foundation Where are the Women? A Report on the Status of Women in the United States Curricula. Copyright © 2017 by National Women’s History Museum. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this report may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission by the copyright owner. The National Women’s History Museum would like to give special thanks to all the Charter Members whose generous tax-deductible gifts made the research for this report possible and enable the organization to continue its important work bringing women’s history into the light of day.
    [Show full text]