DOCSLIB.ORG

Yaacov Shavit an Imaginary Trio

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Yaacov Shavit An Imaginary Trio Yaacov Shavit An Imaginary Trio King Solomon, Jesus, and Aristotle Die freie Verfügbarkeit der E-Book-Ausgabe dieser Publikation wurde ermöglicht durch den Fachinformationsdienst Jüdische Studien an der Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg Frankfurt am Main und 18 wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken, die die Open-Access-Transformation in den Jüdischen Studien unterstützen. ISBN 978-3-11-067718-8 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-067726-3 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-067730-0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Das E-Book ist als Open-Access-Publikation verfügbar über www.degruyter.com, https://www.doabooks.org und https://www.oapen.org Library of Congress Control Number: 2020909307 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2020 Yaacov Shavit, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Cover image: Statue of King Solomon and Christ in the center of the southern portal of the cathedral Notre-Dame of Strasbourg (Bas-Rhin, France), Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com Open-Access-Transformation in den Jüdischen Studien Open Access für exzellente Publikationen aus den Jüdischen Studien: Dies ist das Ziel der gemeinsamen Initiative des Fachinformationsdiensts Jüdische Studien an der Universitäts- bibliothek J. C. Senckenberg Frankfurt am Main und des Verlags Walter De Gruyter. Unterstützt von 18 Konsortialpartnern können 2020 insgesamt acht Neuerscheinungen im Open Access Goldstandard veröffentlicht werden, darunter auch diese Publikation. Die nachfolgenden wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen haben sich an der Finanzierung beteiligt und fördern damit die Open-Access-Transformation in den Jüdischen Studien und gewährleisten die freie Verfügbarkeit für alle: Fachinformationsdienst Jüdische Studien, Universitätsbibliothek J. C. Senckenberg Frankfurt am Main Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin – Preußischer Kulturbesitz Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin Universitätsbibliothek der Technischen Universität Berlin Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf Universitätsbibliothek der Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder) Bibliothek der Vereinigten Theologischen Seminare der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Niedersächsische Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Hamburg – Carl von Ossietzky Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Bibliothek – Niedersächsische Landesbibliothek Hochschule für Jüdische Studien Heidelberg Universitäts- und Stadtbibliothek Köln Universitätsbibliothek Mainz Universitätsbibliothek der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Münster Herzog August Bibliothek Wolfenbüttel Universitätsbibliothek Wuppertal Contents Acknowledgements IX Introduction 1 Chapter One Biographies Correspond 15 Chapter TwoSolomon and Jesus—TwoSons of God, and of David? 32 Pagan polemic 39 The Sages’ polemic 40 Christian polemic 43 Medieval Jewish Polemic 47 The Broken Dynasty:Solomonand Jesus—two sons of David? 49 Chapter Three Solomon—His Actions and Books: Prefiguration, Typology,and His Teachings 56 Solomon’sTemple 59 The Queen of Sheba’sVisit as aTypological Event 64 The Theological and Allegorical Interpretations of Solomon’s Books 65 The Song of Songs 67 Proverbs 71 Ecclesiastes 73 Chapter FourThe Divine Presenceand aHeavenly Voice Come to Solomon’s Aid—On Sin, Repentance, and Absolution 76 Solomon’sSins and DownfallinJewish Tradition 79 Heaven comes to Solomon’sAid 84 Christianity on Solomon’sSins and Repentance 87 Chapter Five “How is Jesus Greater than Solomon?” Solomon and Jesus as Magicians (Healers and Exorcists) 96 Magic and Occultism 96 Magic and Healing 98 Jesus as aHealer and an Exorcist 103 The Riddle of Solomon’sRing 109 Solomon’sAfter-Life as aMagician 113 VIII Contents Chapter Six Miracles and Wonders: Magic, Satan, and Demons 119 Sorcerersand Magicians 122 Satan and Demons 127 Asmodeus and the DemonsBuild the Temple 131 Chapter Seven Solomon’sWisdom—From Hermes to Aristotle 136 Solomon’sWisdom according to the Sages 143 Solomon’sWisdom in the Middle Ages 145 Solomon’sWisdom in Christian Literature 149 Jesus’ Wisdom 151 From Thoth-Hermes to Aristotle 153 Solomonand Aristotle 159 Wisdom versus Wit 168 Chapter Eight Solomon, Aristoteles Judaicus, and the Invention of aPseudo- Solomonic Library 172 The Invention of aPseudo-Solomonic Library 185 Afterword 191 Bibliography 193 Name Index 230 Acknowledgements The research and writing of this book took place over along, frequentlyinter- rupted, period. My original idea was to write about King Solomon as atimeless legend and myth in various cultures. Yetthe more headwayImade in the vast amount of sourcematerials,the less Icould avoid acknowledging that this was aSisyphean task. The abundanceofsources and the extensive researchlit- erature thathas emergedoverthe last century or so regardingdiverse aspects of the figure of Solomonled me to relinquish my original plan and to limit its scope. Thisbook, then, is not intended to retell even asmall portion of the leg- endary traditions about Solomon.¹ Instead, it focuses on thoseplaces and in- stances where his (imaginary) legendary biographyintersects with thoseof JesusChrist and of Aristotle, the Greek philosopher.Solomon is the axis around which this trio revolvesand is the thread that binds it together. The book is based on the premise that there existsacorrespondence, both overt and implied, be- tween these threebiographies—acorrespondence that has taken shape within avast,multifaceted field of texts for more than two thousand years. First and foremost my thanks goes to Chaya Naor for her endeavorintrans- lating the first version of the book. Throughout my years of research and writing, particularlyinthe final stages, Ihavebeen fortunate to receive assistance, in- sights, and input—both gentle and stern—from colleagues and friends. Iam very grateful to all of the following:Professor SaraKlein-Braslavy,Professor YuvalRotman, Dr.Yuval Haruvi, Dr.MayaShabat (Pinhas), Dr.Yuval Rubovitch, Itamar Levin, Dr.Maoz Cahana,Professor David Katz, Razia Geselson and Jean- LucAllouche (to whom Iamgrateful for his generous and indispensable help), and to Michal Engeland Carl Yonker for improvingthe final version. Without the nearlydaily assistance of Avital Ginat and Irit Halavy,Icould not have brought the idea of this book to fruition. Iowe aspecial debt of gratitude to Professor Manfred Oeming of Heidelberg Universityfor the fruitful months duringwhich he hosted me at the Wissen- schaftlich-Theologisches Seminarand introduced me to the statues of Solomon See Faerber (1902);George Salzberger(1907, 1912); Seymour (1924); Legends of the Jews, by Ginzberg(1909), which as of 2003 has comeout in six editions;and Bialik and Ravnitzky (1931-1934), which sinceits second edition has been the most popular and influential collection of Talmudiclegends (taken largely fromthe Babylonian Talmud) in modernHebrew culture. I should also mention herethe most bizarrebook on this subject,bythe radical American author MoncureD.Conway(1832–1907): Solomon and Solomonic Literature,1899;see review by Tyler (1990). OpenAccess. ©2020Yaacov Shavit, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 International. https:// doi.org/10.1515/9783110677263-001 X Acknowledgements and Jesusatthe StrasbourgCathedral. My gratitude is also due—not for the first time—to Professor Günter Stemberger: טוֹ פב ִּ ְריִ מי חֵ רָ וּ ץ וּ ִמ זּ ָפ וּ בְת וּ ָא ִת מי כִ ֶּ ֶס נף בִ חְ רָ ( “ My fruit is betterthan gold, even fine gold. And my yield than choicesilver”,Proverbs 8:19) Finally, but in truth first and foremost,this book could not have been written without Zohar,who once again has accompanied me along the entire journey, every up and down. Of such apartner Solomon must have thoughtwhen he wrote: ְו ָר ֹח מק פִ ְּ ִנ ני יִ מם כִ רְ הָ ּה ( “ she is moreprecious than jewels”,Proverbs 31:10). Earlyversions of several chapters of this book have appeared in the Culture and Literature supplement of the newspaper Ha’aretz;inthe book Books and Libra- ries published by the Zalman Shazar publishing house, Jerusalem; and in the Festschrift in honor of Professor Peter Schäfer (thanks to Dr.Reimund Leicht, one of its editors,for his important comments). Those chapters appearhere in expandedand supplemented form. The book is dedicated to the memory of Tamar Dror. Fig. 1 South portal of Notre-Dame de Strasbourg, Christ and King Solomon by Jean Vallastre, photobyJean-MarcPascolo, ©Wikimedia Commons. Introduction Twostatues stand on either sideofthe southtransept portal of the Strasbourg Cathedral, one personifying the Church in the figure of the triumphant Ecclesia, the other representing Judaism as the humiliated Synagoga. Between the two sits King Solomon on his throne, the sword of “Solomon’sjudgment” restingonhis knee²;above him, Jesus holds an orb,symbolizing his cosmic statusasthe arbit- er on the dayofthe Last Judgment.³ This is apparentlythe onlywork of art placed in the public sphere thatbringsSolomon and Jesustogether.⁴ It presents the Christian side of what Iwill call the “encounter” or “correspondence” be- tween these twofigures,who
Recommended publications
  • TALMUDIC STUDIES Ephraim Kanarfogel

    TALMUDIC STUDIES Ephraim Kanarfogel

    chapter 22 TALMUDIC STUDIES ephraim kanarfogel TRANSITIONS FROM THE EAST, AND THE NASCENT CENTERS IN NORTH AFRICA, SPAIN, AND ITALY The history and development of the study of the Oral Law following the completion of the Babylonian Talmud remain shrouded in mystery. Although significant Geonim from Babylonia and Palestine during the eighth and ninth centuries have been identified, the extent to which their writings reached Europe, and the channels through which they passed, remain somewhat unclear. A fragile consensus suggests that, at least initi- ally, rabbinic teachings and rulings from Eretz Israel traveled most directly to centers in Italy and later to Germany (Ashkenaz), while those of Babylonia emerged predominantly in the western Sephardic milieu of Spain and North Africa.1 To be sure, leading Sephardic talmudists prior to, and even during, the eleventh century were not yet to be found primarily within Europe. Hai ben Sherira Gaon (d. 1038), who penned an array of talmudic commen- taries in addition to his protean output of responsa and halakhic mono- graphs, was the last of the Geonim who flourished in Baghdad.2 The family 1 See Avraham Grossman, “Zik˙atah shel Yahadut Ashkenaz ‘el Erets Yisra’el,” Shalem 3 (1981), 57–92; Grossman, “When Did the Hegemony of Eretz Yisra’el Cease in Italy?” in E. Fleischer, M. A. Friedman, and Joel Kraemer, eds., Mas’at Mosheh: Studies in Jewish and Moslem Culture Presented to Moshe Gil [Hebrew] (Jerusalem, 1998), 143–57; Israel Ta- Shma’s review essays in K˙ ryat Sefer 56 (1981), 344–52, and Zion 61 (1996), 231–7; Ta-Shma, Kneset Mehkarim, vol.
  • Back Listeners: Locating Nostalgia, Domesticity and Shared Listening Practices in Contemporary Horror Podcasting

    Back Listeners: Locating Nostalgia, Domesticity and Shared Listening Practices in Contemporary Horror Podcasting

    Welcome back listeners: locating nostalgia, domesticity and shared listening practices in Contemporary horror podcasting. Danielle Hancock (BA, MA) The University of East Anglia School of American Media and Arts A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2018 Contents Acknowledgements Page 2 Introduction: Why Podcasts, Why Horror, and Why Now? Pages 3-29 Section One: Remediating the Horror Podcast Pages 49-88 Case Study Part One Pages 89 -99 Section Two: The Evolution and Revival of the Audio-Horror Host. Pages 100-138 Case Study Part Two Pages 139-148 Section Three: From Imagination to Enactment: Digital Community and Collaboration in Horror Podcast Audience Cultures Pages 149-167 Case Study Part Three Pages 168-183 Section Four: Audience Presence, Collaboration and Community in Horror Podcast Theatre. Pages 184-201 Case Study Part Four Pages 202-217 Conclusion: Considering the Past and Future of Horror Podcasting Pages 218-225 Works Cited Pages 226-236 1 Acknowledgements With many thanks to Professors Richard Hand and Mark Jancovich, for their wisdom, patience and kindness in supervising this project, and to the University of East Anglia for their generous funding of this project. 2 Introduction: Why Podcasts, Why Horror, and Why Now? The origin of this thesis is, like many others before it, born from a sense of disjuncture between what I heard about something, and what I experienced of it. The ‘something’ in question is what is increasingly, and I believe somewhat erroneously, termed as ‘new audio culture’. By this I refer to all scholarly and popular talk and activity concerning iPods, MP3s, headphones, and podcasts: everything which we may understand as being tethered to an older history of audio-media, yet which is more often defined almost exclusively by its digital parameters.
  • ONEIROCRITICS and MIDRASH on Reading Dreams and the Scripture

    ONEIROCRITICS and MIDRASH on Reading Dreams and the Scripture

    ONEIROCRITICS AND MIDRASH On Reading Dreams and the Scripture Erik Alvstad A bstr act In the context of ancient theories of dreams and their interpretation, the rabbinic literature offers particularly interesting loci. Even though the view on the nature of dreams is far from un- ambiguous, the rabbinic tradition of oneirocritics, i.e. the discourse on how dreams are interpreted, stands out as highly original. As has been shown in earlier research, oneirocritics resembles scriptural interpretation, midrash, to which it has lent some of its exegetical rules. This article will primarily investigate the interpreter’s role in the rabbinic practice of dream interpretation, as reflected in a few rabbinic stories from the two Talmuds and from midrashim. It is shown that these narrative examples have some common themes. They all illustrate the polysemy of the dream-text, and how the person who puts an interpretation on it constructs the dream’s significance. Most of the stories also emphasize that the outcome of the dream is postponed until triggered by its interpretation. Thus the dreams are, in a sense, pictured as prophetic – but it is rather the interpreter that constitutes the prophetic instance, not the dream itself. This analysis is followed by a concluding discussion on the analogical relation between the Scripture and the dream-text, and the interpretative practices of midrash and oneirocritics. he striking similarities between the rabbinic traditions of Scriptural exegesis, midrash, and the rabbinic practice of Tdream interpretation,
  • The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿavoda Zara By

    The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿavoda Zara By

    The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿAvoda Zara By Mira Beth Wasserman A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley in Jewish Studies in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Daniel Boyarin, chair Professor Chana Kronfeld Professor Naomi Seidman Professor Kenneth Bamberger Spring 2014 Abstract The Humanity of the Talmud: Reading for Ethics in Bavli ʿAvoda Zara by Mira Beth Wasserman Joint Doctor of Philosophy with Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley University of California, Berkeley Professor Daniel Boyarin, chair In this dissertation, I argue that there is an ethical dimension to the Babylonian Talmud, and that literary analysis is the approach best suited to uncover it. Paying special attention to the discursive forms of the Talmud, I show how juxtapositions of narrative and legal dialectics cooperate in generating the Talmud's distinctive ethics, which I characterize as an attentiveness to the “exceptional particulars” of life. To demonstrate the features and rewards of a literary approach, I offer a sustained reading of a single tractate from the Babylonian Talmud, ʿAvoda Zara (AZ). AZ and other talmudic discussions about non-Jews offer a rich resource for considerations of ethics because they are centrally concerned with constituting social relationships and with examining aspects of human experience that exceed the domain of Jewish law. AZ investigates what distinguishes Jews from non-Jews, what Jews and non- Jews share in common, and what it means to be a human being. I read AZ as a cohesive literary work unified by the overarching project of examining the place of humanity in the cosmos.
  • Oneg 6 – Toldos 2018

    Oneg 6 – Toldos 2018

    1 Oneg! A collection of fascinating material on the weekly parsha! Rabbi Elchanan Shoff Parshas TOLDOS Avraham begat Yitzchak (Gen. 25:19). The Or Hachaim and R. Shlomo Kluger (Chochmas Hatorah, Toldos p. 3) explain that it was in Avraham’s merit that G-d accepted Yitzchak’s prayers and granted him offspring. Rashi (to Gen. 15:15, 25:30) explains that G-d had Avraham die five years earlier than he otherwise should have in order that Avraham would not see Yitzchak’s son Esau stray from the proper path. I saw in the name of R. Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld (Chochmas Chaim to Toldos) that if Yitzchak had not campaigned vigorously in prayer to father a child, G-d would have granted him children anyways after five years. So in which merit did Yitzchak father his children, in Avraham’s merit or in the merit of his own prayers? Both are true: It was only in Avraham’s merit that Yitzchak deserved to father Yaakov and Esau, but the fact that the twins were born earlier rather than later came in merit of Yitzchak’s prayers. R. Sonnenfeld adds that the Torah’s expression equals in Gematria the (748 = ויעתר לו י-ה-ו-ה) that denotes G-d heeding Yitzchak’s prayers .The above sefer records that when a grandson of R .)748 = חמש שנים) phrase five years Sonnenfeld shared this Gematria with R. Aharon Kotler, he was so taken aback that he exclaimed, “I am certain that this Gematria was revealed through Ruach HaKodesh!” Yitzchak was forty years old when he took Rivkah—the daughter of Besuel the Aramite from Padan Aram, the sister of Laban the Aramite—as a wife (Gen.
  • Muhammad Speaking of the Messiah: Jesus in the Hadīth Tradition

    Muhammad Speaking of the Messiah: Jesus in the Hadīth Tradition

    MUHAMMAD SPEAKING OF THE MESSIAH: JESUS IN THE HADĪTH TRADITION A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Fatih Harpci (May 2013) Examining Committee Members: Prof. Khalid Y. Blankinship, Advisory Chair, Department of Religion Prof. Vasiliki Limberis, Department of Religion Prof. Terry Rey, Department of Religion Prof. Zameer Hasan, External Member, TU Department of Physics © Copyright 2013 by Fatih Harpci All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Much has been written about Qur’ānic references to Jesus (‘Īsā in Arabic), yet no work has been done on the structure or formal analysis of the numerous references to ‘Īsā in the Hadīth, that is, the collection of writings that report the sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad. In effect, non-Muslims and Muslim scholars neglect the full range of Prophet Muhammad’s statements about Jesus that are in the Hadīth. The dissertation’s main thesis is that an examination of the Hadīths’ reports of Muhammad’s words about and attitudes toward ‘Īsā will lead to fuller understandings about Jesus-‘Īsā among Muslims and propose to non-Muslims new insights into Christian tradition about Jesus. In the latter process, non-Muslims will be encouraged to re-examine past hostile views concerning Muhammad and his words about Jesus. A minor thesis is that Western readers in particular, whether or not they are Christians, will be aided to understand Islamic beliefs about ‘Īsā, prophethood, and eschatology more fully. In the course of the dissertation, Hadīth studies will be enhanced by a full presentation of Muhammad’s words about and attitudes toward Jesus-‘Īsā.
  • The Relationship Between Targum Song of Songs and Midrash Rabbah Song of Songs

    The Relationship Between Targum Song of Songs and Midrash Rabbah Song of Songs

    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TARGUM SONG OF SONGS AND MIDRASH RABBAH SONG OF SONGS Volume I of II A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2010 PENELOPE ROBIN JUNKERMANN SCHOOL OF ARTS, HISTORIES, AND CULTURES TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME ONE TITLE PAGE ............................................................................................................ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................. 2 ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. 6 DECLARATION ........................................................................................................ 7 COPYRIGHT STATEMENT ....................................................................................... 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DEDICATION ............................................................... 9 CHAPTER ONE : INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 11 1.1 The Research Question: Targum Song and Song Rabbah ......................... 11 1.2 The Traditional View of the Relationship of Targum and Midrash ........... 11 1.2.1 Targum Depends on Midrash .............................................................. 11 1.2.2 Reasons for Postulating Dependency .................................................. 14 1.2.2.1 Ambivalence of Rabbinic Sources Towards Bible Translation .... 14 1.2.2.2 The Traditional
  • Transcendence of God

    Transcendence of God

    TRANSCENDENCE OF GOD A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE OLD TESTAMENT AND THE QUR’AN BY STEPHEN MYONGSU KIM A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE PHILOSOPHIAE DOCTOR (PhD) IN BIBLICAL AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES IN THE FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA SUPERVISOR: PROF. DJ HUMAN CO-SUPERVISOR: PROF. PGJ MEIRING JUNE 2009 © University of Pretoria DEDICATION To my love, Miae our children Yein, Stephen, and David and the Peacemakers around the world. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I thank God for the opportunity and privilege to study the subject of divinity. Without acknowledging God’s grace, this study would be futile. I would like to thank my family for their outstanding tolerance of my late studies which takes away our family time. Without their support and kind endurance, I could not have completed this prolonged task. I am grateful to the staffs of University of Pretoria who have provided all the essential process of official matter. Without their kind help, my studies would have been difficult. Many thanks go to my fellow teachers in the Nairobi International School of Theology. I thank David and Sarah O’Brien for their painstaking proofreading of my thesis. Furthermore, I appreciate Dr Wayne Johnson and Dr Paul Mumo for their suggestions in my early stage of thesis writing. I also thank my students with whom I discussed and developed many insights of God’s relationship with mankind during the Hebrew Exegesis lectures. I also remember my former teachers from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary, especially from the OT Department who have shaped my academic stand and inspired to pursue the subject of this thesis.
  • 'He Descended Into Hell': Creed, Article and Scripture Part 1 JOHN YATES 1

    'He Descended Into Hell': Creed, Article and Scripture Part 1 JOHN YATES 1

    'He Descended into Hell': Creed, Article and Scripture Part 1 JOHN YATES 1. Introduction The 'descent into hell' is an expression of Christian truth to which members of the Anglican Communion are immediately committed in three places: The Apostles' Creed, The Athanasian Creed and Article 3. 1 Despite this it is probably true that of all the credal statements (at least of those in The Apostles' Creed) it is the one which is the most poorly understood. One major aim of this article is to remedy this deficiency in a public forum, and to do so in a manner which self-consciously remains faithful to the classical Anglican emphasis on the essential interrelatedness of scripture, tradition and reason in all matters of theological endeavour. To adopt such an approach is to deny both that appeal to tradition alone can be determinative for doctrine (as in Roman Catholicism), or, that one must necessarily be able to point directly to passages of scripture to authenticate a theological position (as in the claims of various forms of modern Fundamentalism). Article 8 puts the matter at hand clearly. 'The Three Creeds, Nicene Creed, Athanasius's Creed, and that which is commonly called the Apostles' Creed, ought thoroughly to be received and believed: for they may be proved by most certain warrants of Holy Scripture'. This Article does not claim that the form of a credal statement must be scriptural, but rather that because the content of the specifically named creeds are biblical they are to be accepted. 2 The authority of the creeds in matters of faith and conduct rests upon their background in the Bible, and never vice-versa.
  • New Testament Canon.” the Word “Canon” Is Actually a Greek Word That Means “Rule” Or “Measure.”

    New Testament Canon.” the Word “Canon” Is Actually a Greek Word That Means “Rule” Or “Measure.”

    How We Got Our New Testament Greg Stiekes, Pastor, Bethany Bible Church, 2014 Introduction We call the 27 books that comprise our New Testament the “New Testament Canon.” The word “canon” is actually a Greek word that means “rule” or “measure.” For example, the word “canon” is used in Galatians 6:16—“As for all who walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them.” In the overall context of the letter to the Galatians, Paul is saying that there is a standard by which he wanted the church to measure up, and whoever was not walking according to that standard was not living out the true Gospel of Jesus Christ. Notice, then, that a canon is a standard that limits or confines. When applied to the New Testament, the word canon means those original, Greek writings which measure up to or meet the standard of being the Word of God. And the canon limits those writings to 27 “books”—no greater, no fewer; 27 books which are believed to comprise the authoritative writings divinely given by God to the church. Yet a 27-book New Testament canon raises several questions which God’s people should be able to answer, especially when skeptics attack the accuracy and authority of the Bible: 1. How do we know that these and these only 27 Greek documents are the writings God gave to the church? 2. Are the present Greek copies of these books accurate? 3. Do we have confident English translations of the original Greek? 4. Why are other early writings rejected from the canon, even though they claim to be from God or his apostles? Question 1: Why these and these only 27 New Testament Books? The Attack: The New Testament canon was formed by the followers of one version of Christianity which dominated in the first centuries A.D.
  • 2 Argumentative Christian Story and the Bible

    2 Argumentative Christian Story and the Bible

    2 Argumentative Christian Story and the Bible Literary Poetics from the Hebrew Bible to the Quran Literary Poetics in the Hebrew Bible The perspective that drives the analysis, research, and interpretation for this book and the series in which it appears concerns the persuasive na- ture of religious discourse from the Hebrew Bible through the New Testament to the Quran in the seventh century CE. Paul Ricoeur helped to inaugurate the approach in this book and in this series with his essay in 1980 entitled “Toward a Hermeneutic of the Idea of Revelation.”1 In this essay, he discusses five discourses in the Hebrew Bible: prophetic, narrative, prescriptive, wisdom, and hymnic discourse.2 Ricoeur’s ap- proach helped to move biblical interpretation beyond historical and theological issues into an appreciation of the Hebrew Bible from the perspective of the literary poetics it made conventional in Jewish tradi- tion. This means, for Ricoeur, that there are five conventional “poetics” in the Hebrew Bible. In each instance there are two or more entire books in the Hebrew Bible that contain a conventional poetics. Ricoeur does not list them, but it is easy to see the literary home of prophetic poetics in the major and minor prophets; the literary home of narrative poetics in Genesis through Exodus 19, Joshua through 2 Kings, Ezra-Nehemiah through 1-2 Chronicles, and perhaps Ruth; the literary home of pre- scriptive poetics in Exodus 20-40, Leviticus, and Deuteronomy; the liter- 1 Paul Ricoeur, Essays on Biblical Interpretation (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980) 75-85. Subsequently, David Tracy built on Ricoeur’s insights in Plurality and Ambiguity: Herme- neutics, Religion, Hope (San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987).
  • BIBLICAL GENEALOGIES Adam → Seth

    BIBLICAL GENEALOGIES Adam → Seth

    BIBLICAL GENEALOGIES Adam → Seth → Enosh → Kenan → Mahalalel → Jared→ Enoch → Methuselah → Lamech → Noah (70 descendants to repopulate the earth after the flood – Gen. 10: 1- 32; 1 Chr. 1: 1-27; sons, grandsons, great grandsons): 1 2 The sons of Kenaz (1 Chr. 1: 36) joined the Jews by the tribe of Judah. His descendant was Jephunneh the Kenizzite, who begot Caleb (Num. 32: 12; Josh. 14: 6; 14; 1 Chr. 4: 13-15). Amalek was the father of the Amalekites. Descendants of Jacob (Gen. 46: 26-27) who came to Egypt: • From Reuben: Hanoch, Pallu, Hezron and Carmi. • From Simeon: Jemuel, Jamin, Ohad, Jakin, Zohar and Shaul (son of a Canaanite woman). • From Levi: Gershon, Kohath and Merari. • From Judah: Er ( in Canaan), Onan ( in Canaan), Shelah, Perez and Zerah; From Perez: Hezron and Hamul. • From Issachar: Tola, Puah (or Puvah, Masoretic text), Jashub (or Iob, Masoretic text) and Shimron. • From Zebulun: Sered, Elon and Jahleel. • Dinah (they were all sons of Leah , who had died in Canaan – Gen. 49: 31); total of 33 people (including Jacob). • From Gad: Zephon (Septuagint and Samaritan Pentateuch or Ziphion in Masoretic text), Haggi, Shuni, Ezbom, Eri, Arodi and Areli • From Asher: Imnah, Ishvah, Ishvi, Beriah and Serah (their sister). Beriah begat Heber and Malkiel (they were all sons of Zilpah , Leah’s maidservant); total of 16 people. • From Joseph: Manasseh and Ephraim. • From Benjamin: Bela, Beker, Ashbel, Gera, Naaman, Ehi, Rosh, Muppim, Huppim and Ard. They were all sons of Rachel , who had already died in Canaan – Gen. 35: 19), a total of 14 people.