Gordon M. Graham (Part 3 of 4)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gordon M. Graham (Part 3 of 4) The American Fighter Aces Association Oral Interviews The Museum of Flight Seattle, Washington Gordon M. Graham (Part 3 of 4) Interview Date: circa 1990s 2 Abstract: In this four-part oral history, fighter ace Gordon M. Graham discusses his military service with the United States Army Air Forces during World War II. In part three, he continues to describe his experiences as a fighter pilot while serving with the 355th Fighter Group in England. Special focus on a bomber escort mission over Germany on December 25, 1944. Biography: Gordon M. Graham was born on February 16, 1918 in Ouray, Colorado. In 1940, he graduated from the University of California with a degree in petroleum engineering and shortly afterward joined the United States Army Air Forces. After serving for several years as a flight instructor, Graham joined the 355th Fighter Group as commander of the 354th Fighter Squadron in England. He remained in the military after World War II and held a number of command positions with the Air Force. He also flew missions in both the Korean War and the Vietnam War; between the three wars, he accumulated over 1,000 combat hours in fighter aircraft. Over the course of his career, Graham served with the 31st Tactical Fighter Wing, the 4th Tactical Fighter Wing, the Nineteenth Air Force, the Seventh Air Force, the Ninth Air Force, Tactical Air Command, and the Sixth Allied Tactical Air Force. He retired as a lieutenant general in 1973 and passed away in 2008. Biographical information courtesy of: Boyce, Ward J., ed., American fighter aces album. Mesa, Ariz: American Fighter Aces Association, 1996. Restrictions: Permission to publish material from the American Fighter Aces Association Oral Interviews must be obtained from The Museum of Flight Archives. Transcript: Transcribed by Pioneer Transcription Services 3 Index: Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Service details ................................................................................................................................. 4 Bomber escort mission over Germany (December 25, 1944) ......................................................... 5 More service details and conclusion ............................................................................................... 8 4 Gordon M. Graham (Part 3 of 4) [START OF INTERVIEW] [Begin Side A] 00:00:00 [Introduction] GORDON M. GRAHAM: …Graham, Mr. Hammel. G-O-R-D-O-N, M as in Mike, G-R-A-H-A- M. I’m responding to your recent correspondence—well, it’s a couple of months old or more now—asking that I furnish you with “information pertaining to your most exciting combat mission of World War II.” I must say, I think they’re—or thought they were all exciting. I don’t think that it’s possible to describe in the years now that have gone by and remember exactly what those missions were like. My encounter reports are fairly standard. They’re not—as you probably have read dozens and dozens of them, they’re fairly stereotyped. They were taken by the Intelligence Officer and written up and then signed by the individual after they had been typed up. 00:01:25 Anyway, one mission does come to mind because—not necessarily because the mission was that interesting, although it was pretty exciting, but there was a rather unique situation that occurred both before and after the mission. And so I picked this out, and you can use whatever part of it you want. I’ll make some interjections. Perhaps—and later, if you send me the copy, I might edit it a little bit. But I’ll describe it, and you can see what you think. [Service details] Let me put in a little information at first. I have been retired since July 1973. I retired as a lieutenant general after 34 years of service. And I served in all three wars. The last one, in Vietnam, I flew 146 missions—combat missions, fighter-combat missions. And I think rather than attempt to describe my background, I’ll just send you a copy of my biography, and you can extract from that whatever you wish. And then I won’t have to also fill out the sheet that you sent, that you indicated—well, I’ll probably—I’ll fill that out anyway. But let me get on to this mission. I was assigned to the 355th Fighter Group, 354th Fighter Squadron. When I was first assigned to the group, I was not the squadron commander, but shortly afterwards I was assigned as squadron commander of the 354th Fighter Squadron. We were flying P-51Ds and some Cs and had been flying Bs. I did not fly any combat missions in 5 anything other than a D model. Although I did fly some of the other airplanes because we hadn’t fully converted when I got there. 00:04:22 [Bomber escort mission over Germany (December 25, 1944)] This mission that I’m about to describe—well, our primary mission was escort the bombers. We were assigned to the 2nd Air Division, and the structure there, as you probably well know, three air divisions—this is in Eighth Air Force in England—two of the air divisions were equipped with B-17s and one with B-24s. The 2nd Air Division, our assigned division, being B-24- equipped, as far as bombers was concerned. The fighter groups were equipped primarily with 51s, although there were—I think there were two P-47—or at least one, I know, the 78th, when I got there, still had 47s. And the 56th. Also, there were two P-38 groups, as I remember. Later, I think those both converted to 51s. So most of our work was involved in escorting B-24s, but B-17s as well. And we did have some ground work, primarily strafing of transportation targets and airfields. And, in fact, our group had the highest destruction total of aircraft on the ground. We were known as the “Steeple Morden Strafers” because our base was on the outskirts of a very small village called Steeple Morden. 00:06:25 This mission was a—let’s see. This mission was on Christmas Day of 1944. And it was—no. I’m sorry. I’m reading the wrong encounter report. Well, I was correct the first time. It was Christmas Day 1944. And on this mission, I was leading Falcon Squadron, which was the 354th Squadron, “Falcon” being the call sign. And we were assigned a close escort to B-24s. And our group, our fighter group, had been split up the previous day, and our—my squadron was—we landed at three different fields, and we never got together when we took off on this particular mission. And so I had one flight that was flying with the other two squadrons in the group: the 357th and 358th squadrons. And two flights out of my four didn’t get airborne at all because of the weather. And so I had—for the particular mission, I had one flight of four ships and one flight of three. About 12 minutes before target time—and incidentally, the target was in the Hamburg area. I don’t remember now what the specific target was. Steel or steel mills or whatever. Port facilities, perhaps. I’ve forgotten now what the actual target was. But about 12 minutes before target time, Nuthouse, which was the call sign of our ground control radar installation—which was on the continent by now. Nuthouse called in a bunch of bandits 20 miles northeast of our bomber force. And I crossed to get between this point and the bomber force and detected what appeared to be a gaggle forming up in the indicated area. However, it was too far away to lead the bomber force 6 to investigate. Our bombers released their loads, and as their targets were a few miles apart, the groups were scattered somewhat in the target area. I orbited during the bombing and the controller, Nuthouse, gave us another position report to the effect that the gaggle was approaching from the east. About five minutes after turning on the withdrawal course, I observed a gaggle of 75-plus Focke- Wulf 190s and Messerschmitt 109s approaching from five o’clock level to a group of bombers, about four o’clock to me and 3,000 feet below me. I was flying at 27,000 feet. 00:10:38 Prior to target time, the three-ship flight with me had gone down to bounce some bogeys and was at approximately 15,000 feet, climbing back up toward my flight. I called a bounce, drop tanks, and went balls-out for the gaggle. My wingman did not follow me. Immediately after calling the bounce, my element leader called in 15-plus Messerschmitt 109s, which were about 3,000 feet above us covering the main gaggle. The Me 109s dived in to cut the three ships off that were climbing up, and my second element leader turned to engage them. I continued straight on into the gaggle to help—to break-up the attack about 800 to 1,000 yards behind the bombers. As I was closing, all of the gaggle fired simultaneously at the bomber force. I closed rapidly and hit them in the middle and opened fire immediately. They began to split-S just before I hit them and, just as I went through, fired another long burst. I closed fast on one from dead astern and fired a long burst from zero deflection at about 250 yards, observing many strikes around the wing roots and pieces flying off. As I pulled up to go over him, he either jettisoned his canopy or it came off, and he was climbing out of the ship as I shot by.
Recommended publications
  • Welcome to the Inn at Davis-Monthan Davis-Monthan AFB, Arizona 355Th Force Support Squadron
    Welcome to the Inn at Davis-Monthan Davis-Monthan AFB, Arizona 355th Force Support Squadron The appearance of local business names does NOT imply federal endorsements. All information to include addresses and telephone numbers are subject to change. Please call the business to confirm their operation hours. Please do not remove this directory from your room. PAGE 1 WELCOME LODGING GUESTS We are pleased you have chosen to stay at the Heritage Inn on Davis-Monthan as our guest and we look forward to making your stay comfortable, safe and pleasant. On behalf of the Fighter Wing commander, Mission Support Group commander, Force Support Squadron commander and the lodging staff, we welcome you to Davis-Monthan Air Force Base. This directory has been especially prepared to provide you useful information regarding the Inn on Davis-Monthan policies, the City of Tucson and available guest services. Any commercial establishments listed in the guide are provided to you only as a convenience. We sincerely welcome your comments and recommendations to assist us in improving our service to you. You may do this by calling the reception center or by completing the Air Force Lodging Customer Comment Card, provided in your room or Online Lodging Website. We strive for excellence and guest service is our number one priority. Please take a moment to let us know how we are doing. If we can help in any way to make your visit more enjoyable, safe or comfortable, please call us. You can reach the manager on duty anytime by dialing “0” from your guest room phone.
    [Show full text]
  • Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis]
    Davis-Monthan Air Force Base 2016 [Economic Impact Analysis] Preface Commander’s Foreword 2 The History of Davis-Monthan AFB 3 Economic Impact Tables Table 1 – Executive Summary 4 Table 2-3 – Total Personnel / Annual Payroll by Classification and 5 Housing Location Table 4-5 – Total Civilian Personnel / Payroll by Appropriated and 6 Non-Appropriated Funds Table 6 – Expense Report 7 Table 7-8 – Indirect Jobs Created / Tucson Retiree Data 8 Table 9 – Economic Impact Estimate 9 Economic Impact Charts Chart 1 – Annual Economic Impact Estimates (w/o retirees) 9 Chart 2-3 – Appropriated Funds Military Payroll / Assigned 10 Chart 4-5 – Appropriated Funds Civilian Payroll / Military Retiree 11 Payments Chart 6-7 – Annual Estimated Jobs Created ($M / # Jobs) 12 1 Davis-Monthan Air Force Base [Economic Impact Analysis] 2016 PREFACE Commander’s Foreword Davis-Monthan Air Force Base (D-M AFB) is pleased to present its Economic Impact Analysis for Fiscal Year 2016. The Wing’s mission is clear: Deploy, employ, support, and sustain attack airpower in support of Combatant Commanders anywhere in the world at a moment’s notice; train the finest attack pilots for the Combat Air Forces; provide every member of Team D-M with responsive, tailored, mission-focused base support. The Wing’s vision is resolute: A premier Fighter Wing comprised of resilient Airmen, armed with precise tools and training; powered by a culture of leadership and innovation; prepared to provide responsive combat airpower which exceeds Combatant Command expectations for excellence. Members of D-M AFB live, work, and educate their children in the Tucson area.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerospace World
    Aerospace World By Suzann Chapman, Managing Editor Three Killed in MC-130 Crash Two airmen and one soldier were killed when an Air Force MC-130H Combat Talon II crashed upon take- off in southeast Afghanistan June 12. The airmen were TSgt. Sean M. Corlew, 37, of Thousands Oaks, Ca- lif., and SSgt. Anissa A. Shero, 31, of Grafton, W.Va. They were both as- signed to the 16th Special Opera- USAF photo by MSgt. Andrew E. Lynch tions Wing at Hurlburt Field, Fla. Seven other US military members on board survived and were taken to a medical facility for treatment. Officials said there was no indica- tion the crash was caused by enemy fire. An investigation is under way. Murray Is New CMSAF The Air Force Chief of Staff, Gen. John P. Jumper, selected CMSgt. Gerald R. Murray as the 14th Chief An Air Force A-10 waits on the flight line at Bagram, Afghanistan, for a mainte- Master Sergeant of the Air Force. nance check before its next mission. A-10s recently foiled an al Qaeda attack Plans called for Murray to assume on a coalition base. (See “A-10s Stop Attack,” p. 13.) the highest enlisted post in the ser- vice July 1. Jumper said the decision was “dif- proposal as part of the service’s lat- “Aerospace World: Alaska Gains Air- ficult because the candidates were est mobility roadmap. If approved and lifter Missions,” June, p. 22.) all so exceptionally qualified.” funded, the plan calls for buying or Murray, who was serving as com- modernizing more than 700 aircraft ANG Gets New Director mand chief master sergeant for Pa- over the next 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • SPEEDX's World of Utilities Collection
    SPEEDX's World of Utilities collection This is a collection of the electronic editions of "SPEEDX's World of Utilities" The electronic version was published between July 1992 and January 1995. Included are volumes: 1-00 February 1992 1-01 March 1992 1-02 April 1992 1-03 October 1992 1-04 January 1993 2-02 May 1993 2-03 June 1993 2-04 August 1993 2-05 September 1993 2-06 October 1993 2-07 November 1993 2-08 December 1993 3-01 January 1994 3-02 February 1994 3-03 March 1994 3-05 April 1994 3-06 May 1994 3-07 June 1994 3-08 July 1994 4-09 August 1994 4-10 September 1994 4-11 October 1994 4-12 December 1994 5-01 January 1995 5-02 February 1995 5-03 March 1995 WUN announcement February 1995 Front page of the first WUN newsletter If you have the missing volumes, please mail them to [email protected] :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::: SPEEDX UTILITY WORLD ONLINE ELECTRONIC EDITION :::::: ::::::::: ****The Utility Signals Online Monthly****** :::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: Volume 1, Number 0 February 1992 :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: The following file is courtesy of the SPEEDX shortwave listeners club and is an actual excerpt from the February 1992 Utility World Column. All references to the material in this file should acknowledge credit to the author and the SPEEDX club bulletin. SPEEDX is published monthly by SPEEDX (the Society to Preserve the Engrossing Enjoyment of DXing), DuBois, PA, USA, a non-profit hobby organization founded in 1971. To obtain a sample copy of the SPEEDX Bulletin, please contact the publisher: Edward Janusz, Publisher P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. European Command
    U.S. European Command Communication and Engagement Directorate - Media Operations Division Comm: +49 (0) 711 680 6868/6618/8010 / DSN: 314-430-6868/6618/8010 [email protected] www.facebook.com/eucom www.twitter.com/us_eucom www.instagram.com/us_eucom EUCOM DVIDS Hub: https://www.dvidshub.net/unit/EUCOM#.VQBztSz_7Gw European Security/DoD Specials Page: http://www.defense.gov/home/features/2014/0514_atlanticresolve/ OPERATION ATLANTIC RESOLVE (SEPTEMBER 2015) Operation Atlantic Resolve is a demonstration of our continued commitment to the collective security of NATO and dedication to the enduring peace and stability in the region, in light of the Russian intervention in Ukraine specifically. U.S. commitment to the security of every NATO ally is resolute and uniform. In meeting our global security commitments, the United States must have strong, committed and capable allies, which is why we have fought, exercised and trained with our European allies for the past 70 years. The U.S.-European strategic partnership is built on a foundation of shared values, experiences and vision. The U.S. took several immediate steps to demonstrate solidarity with our NATO allies, such as augmenting the air, ground and naval presence in the region, and enhancing previously scheduled exercises. Russia's aggressive actions have already led many to call for reinforcing NATO's readiness through Article 5-related planning training and adjustments to force posture. Operation Atlantic Resolve will remain in place as long as the need exists to reassure our allies and deter Russia from regional hegemony. European Reassurance Initiative ERI is part of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2015, signed by President Obama on December 19, 2014, included $985 million in ERI funds.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 2 SUMMER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 2
    SummerCover1&4.qxp 4/24/2008 7:43 PM Page 1 SUMMER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 2 WWW.AFHISTORICALFOUNDATION.ORG SUMMER 2008 - Volume 55, Number 2 WWW.AFHISTORICALFOUNDATION.ORG Features A Visionary Ahead of His Time: Howard Hughes and the U.S. Air Force —Part III: The Falcon Missile and Airborne Fire Control Thomas Wildenberg 4 The Sacred Cow and the Creation of the United States Air Force Jeffery S. Underwood 14 Air Power in the Global War on Terror: The Perspective from the Ground Randy G. Bergeron 20 Korean War Diary William Y. Smith 28 Book Reviews Rattlesnake Bomber Base: Pyote Army Airfield in World War II By Thomas E. Alexander Reviewed by Joseph L. Mason 46 History of Rocketry and Astronautics: AAS Ser. Vol 27- IAA Sym Vol 18: By Kerrie Dougherty & Donald Elders Reviewed by Rick W. Sturdevant 46 Into That Silent Sea: Trailblazers of the Space Era, 1961-1965 By Francis French & Colin Burgess Reviewed by Rick W. Sturdevant 47 The Son Tay Raid: American POWs in Vietnam Were Not Forgotten By Jon Gargus Reviewed by Joshua Pope 47 Canadian Combat and Support Aircraft: A Military Compendium By T.F.J. Leversedge Reviewed by David F. Crosby 48 Gauntlet: Five Friends, 20,000 Enemy Troops and the Secret that Could Have Changed the Course of the Cold War By Barbara Masin Reviewed by Curtis H. O’Sullivan 48 Striking First: Preemptive and Preventive Attack in U.S. National Security Policy By Karl P. Mueller, et al Reviewed by John L. Cirafici 48 8th Air Force: American Heavy Bomber Groups in England, 1942-1945 By Gregory Pons.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Military Affairs Commission
    ECONOMIC IMPACT OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS Military Affairs Commission PREPARED BY The Maguire Company 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND AND STUDY METHODOLOGY 1 CHAPTER TWO: DESCRIPTIONS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS 9 CHAPTER THREE: EMPLOYMENT AND SPENDING BY ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS 28 CHAPTER FOUR: ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS 32 CHAPTER FIVE: STATE AND LOCAL TAX REVENUES DERIVED FROM ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS 35 CHAPTER SIX: COMPARISONS TO THE MILITARY INDUSTRY IN ARIZONA 37 CHAPTER SEVEN: COMPARISONS OF THE MILITARY INDUSTRY OVER TIME 41 APPENDICES APPENDIX ONE: HOW IMPLAN WORKS A-1 APPENDIX TWO: RETIREE METHODOLOGY A-5 APPENDIX THREE: ECONOMETRIC MODEL INPUTS A-6 APPENDIX FOUR: DETAILED STATEWIDE MODEL OUTPUT A-14 APPENDIX FIVE: REGIONAL IMPACT INFORMATION A-15 ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS The Maguire Company LIST OF TABLES TABLE 3-1: SUMMARY OF BASIC PERSONNEL STATISTICS 28 Arizona’s Principal Military Operations TABLE 3-2: SUMMARY OF MILITARY RETIREE STATISTICS 29 Arizona’s Principal Military Operations TABLE 3-3: SUMMARY OF PAYROLL AND RETIREMENT BENEFITS 30 Arizona’s Principal Military Operations TABLE 3-4: SUMMARY OF SPENDING STATISTICS 31 Arizona’s Principal Military Operations TABLE 4-1: SUMMARY OF STATEWIDE ECONOMIC IMPACTS 33 Arizona’s Principal Military Operations TABLE 5-1: SUMMARY OF STATEWIDE FISCAL IMPACTS 35 Arizona’s Military Industry TABLE 5-2: STATEWIDE FISCAL IMPACTS 36 Arizona’s Military Industry TABLE 6-1: COMPARISON OF MAJOR INDUSTRIES/ EMPLOYERS IN ARIZONA 39 TABLE 7-1: COMPARISON OF MILITARY INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT IN FY 2000, FY 2005, AND FY 2014 41 TABLE 7-2: COMPARISON OF MILITARY INDUSTRY ECONOMIC OUTPUT IN FY 2000, FY 2005, AND FY 2014 41 ARIZONA’S PRINCIPAL MILITARY OPERATIONS The Maguire Company ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We wish to acknowledge and thank the leadership and personnel of the various military operations included within this study.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transformation Trinity a Model for Strategic Innovation and Its Application to Space Power
    The Transformation Trinity A Model for Strategic Innovation and Its Application to Space Power BRUCE H. MCCLINTOCK, Major, USAF School of Advanced Airpower Studies THESIS PRESENTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF ADVANCED AIRPOWER STUDIES, MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA, FOR COMPLETION OF GRADUATION REQUIREMENTS, ACADEMIC YEAR 1999–2000. Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 36112–6615 May 2002 This School of Advanced Airpower Studies thesis is available electronically at the Air University Research Web site http://research.maxwell.af.mil under “Research Papers,” then “Special Collections.” Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: dis- tribution unlimited. ii Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii ABSTRACT . v ABOUT THE AUTHOR . vii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . ix 1 INTRODUCTION . 1 2 THE TRANSFORMATION TRINITY . 9 3 THE SPACE POWER VISION: MECCA OR MIRAGE? . 23 4 CULTURAL CHANGE IN THE MILITARY SPACE COMMUNITY . 39 5 ASSESSING SPACE THEORIES OF VICTORY . 59 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . 73 Illustrations Figure 1 The General Relationship between Military and Civilian Visions of Space Power . 31 iii Abstract “The world that lies in store for us over the next 25 years will surely challenge our received wisdom about how to protect American interests and advance American values.” With these words, the Commission on National Security in the 21st Century captured the exciting challenges this study sets out to explore. First, this study develops a generalized model for United States military trans- formations in peacetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 18
    Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 18 Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Fairchild Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II is an American single-seat, twin-engine, straight-wing jet aircraft A-10 Thunderbolt II developed by Fairchild-Republic in the early 1970s. The A- 10 was designed for a United States Air Force requirement to provide close air support (CAS) for ground forces by attacking tanks, armored vehicles, and other ground targets with a limited air interdiction capability. It is the first U.S. Air Force aircraft designed solely for close air support. The A-10 was designed around the GAU-8 Avenger, a heavy rotary cannon which forms the aircraft's primary armament (and is, to date, the heaviest rotary cannon ever mounted on an aircraft). The aircraft's hull incorporates over 1,200 An A-10 from the 81st Fighter Squadron, pounds (540 kg) of armor and was designed with Spangdahlem Air Base, Germany survivability as a priority, with protective measures in place Role Fixed-wing close air support, which enable the aircraft to continue flying even after taking forward air control, and ground- significant damage. attack aircraft The A-10's official name comes from the Republic P-47 Manufacturer Fairchild Republic Thunderbolt of World War II, a fighter that was particularly effective at close air support. The A-10 is more commonly First flight 10 May 1972 known by its nickname "Warthog" or simply "Hog". As a Introduction March 1977 secondary mission, it provides airborne forward air control, Status In service guiding other aircraft against ground targets.
    [Show full text]
  • WRP Military Asset List (MAL)
    WRP Military Asset List (MAL) The Western Regional Partnership (WRP) has compiled the Military Asset List (MAL), a set of summaries describing the history, missions, and importance of installations in the WRP region. These fact sheets include installations from all of the Services and the National Guard. The summaries provide overviews of the military installations and ranges throughout the WRP's region. Their purpose is to better inform WRP Partners on the importance of these installations and ranges and Installations, such as Naval Base their missions by providing brief, accurate, uniform surveys of our assets Point Loma, often encompass vital and their missions from a single source. natural habitats. (U.S. Navy photo) These summaries use only publicly available information and are written WRP VISION STATEMENT for the policy maker new to military issues and the military savvy person WRP will be a significant resource to needing specific military information. It is our hope that WRP Partners proactively address common goals, identify emerging issues and develop use these summaries as a tool for future land use and environmental solutions that support WRP Partners policy and planning efforts throughout WRP's region, ultimately using and protect natural resources, while them to help prevent or mitigate encroachment. promoting sustainability, homeland security and military readiness. WRP MISSION STATEMENT WRP provides a proactive and collaborative framework for senior- policy level Federal, State and Tribal leadership to identify common goals and emerging issues in the states of Arizona, California, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah and to develop solutions that support WRP Partners and protect natural resources, while promoting sustainability, homeland security and military readiness.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-96-111BR Military Readiness B-271209
    United States General Accounting Office Briefing Report to the Chairman, GAO Committee on National Security, House of Representatives March 1996 MILITARY READINESS Data and Trends for January 1990 to March 1995 GOA years 1921 - 1996 GAO/NSIAD-96-111BR United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-271209 March 4, 1996 The Honorable Floyd Spence Chairman, Committee on National Security House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: As you requested, this report is an unclassified version of our earlier classified report on military readiness. We analyzed military readiness data contained in the Department of Defense’s (DOD) Status of Resources and Training System (SORTS) to determine if the data showed significant changes in readiness since 1990—a year of peak readiness. This report provides readiness information for the four military services. Specifically, it (1) summarizes the reported overall readiness status of all military units from January 1, 1990, to March 31, 1995; (2) assesses readiness trends of selected units from each service for the same period, and, where applicable, discusses reported readiness problems experienced throughout a service and by the selected units; and (3) explains significant changes in reported readiness of the selected units. On August 31, 1995, we briefed the Subcommittee on Military Readiness, House Committee on National Security, staff on the results of our work. This report summarizes the information we presented in that briefing. SORTS is DOD’s automated reporting system that identifies the current level Background of selected resources and training status of a unit—that is, its ability to undertake its wartime mission.
    [Show full text]
  • NSIAD-96-194 Military Readiness B-272379
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO National Security, House of Representatives August 1996 MILITARY READINESS Data and Trends for April 1995 to March 1996 GOA years 1921 - 1996 GAO/NSIAD-96-194 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 National Security and International Affairs Division B-272379 August 2, 1996 The Honorable Floyd Spence Chairman, Committee on National Security House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: As you requested, we have updated our Military Readiness report 1 through March 31, 1996, to determine if the data show significant changes. Also, we reviewed readiness data for selected units participating in the Bosnia operation to see whether the operation has affected readiness. This report provides unclassified readiness information on the four military services. Specifically, it (1) assesses readiness trends of selected units from each service from April 1, 1995, to March 31, 1996, with particular emphasis on units that reported degraded readiness during the prior period and (2) assesses readiness trends (for the period Oct.1, 1995, to Mar. 31, 1996) for selected units that participated in the Bosnia operation. On June 26, 1996, we provided a classified briefing to the staff of the Subcommittee on Military Readiness, House Committee on National Security, on the results of our work. This letter summarizes the unclassified information presented in that briefing. Background The Status of Resources and Training System (SORTS) is the Department of Defense’s (DOD) automated reporting system that identifies the current level of selected resources and training status of a unit—that is, its ability to undertake its wartime mission.
    [Show full text]