“Intruthyou Are the Polytheist!”: Mythic Elements in Ibn Al-ʿarabī
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 6 (2018) 359–387 brill.com/ihiw “In Truth You are the Polytheist!”: Mythic Elements in Ibn al-ʿArabī’s Teachings on the Divine Names Michael Ebstein The Hebrew University of Jerusalem [email protected] Abstract The following article aims at highlighting the mythic elements inherent in Muḥyī l-Dīn Ibn al-ʿArabī’s teachings on the Divine names. The article begins with a very general introduction to the subject of Divine names in Islamic mysticism and then proceeds to clarify the meaning of the term “mythic” as it is used in this study.The core of the article is devoted to an examination of four main areas in which the Divine names, according to Ibn al-ʿArabī, play a central role: the creation of the world (cosmogony); its manage- ment; mystical experiences and knowledge; magic and theurgy. The main claim is that in all four areas, Ibn al-ʿArabī’s discourse is to a great extent mythic. The implications of this claim for the understanding of Akbarian thought and for the study of Islamic mysticism in general are discussed in the concluding paragraph of the essay. Keywords Ibn al-ʿArabī – al-Andalus – Divine names – Divine attributes – theology – philosophy – mysticism – Sufism – magic – theurgy – Kabbalah Introduction: The Problem of Divine Names in Classical Islamic Mysticism In his commentary on al-Ǧuwaynī’s Kitāb al-Iršād, Ibn al-Marʾa (d. 611/1214) refers to the now-lost work Tawḥīd al-mūqinīn (“The Unification of Those Who Possess Firm Knowledge”) by his compatriot Ibn Masarra (269/883–319/931), the earliest Muslim mystic in al-Andalus known to us from his writings: © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2018 | doi: 10.1163/2212943X-00603006Downloaded from Brill.com09/29/2021 04:16:55AM via free access 360 ebstein In his book Tawḥīd al-mūqinīn, Ibn Masarra claimed that there is no limit to the number of attributes belonging to Allāh, glory be to Him. In Ibn Masarra’s view, Allāh’s knowledge is alive, it knows and is able, it hears, sees, and speaks. Allāh’s ability (qudratuhu) is likewise described as being alive, as knowing, able, willing, and as possessing a sense of hearing by which it hears. The same is said concerning all of His attributes; this, Ibn Masarra claimed, is unification. He has thus turned the attributes into gods. He said the same concerning the attributes of the attributes (ṣifāt al-ṣifāt), ad infinitum, thus turning God into an unlimited [number of] gods, may Allāh protect us.1 It is difficult to determine whether or not Ibn al-Marʾa’s account is accurate. Both concepts that he ascribes to Ibn Masarra—i.e. the infinite number of Divine attributes and their mutual reflection—are indeed found or echoed in the works of later Andalusī mystics,2 and they may very well have originated in Ibn Masarra’s own writings.3 Whatever the case might be, what is relevant to the current discussion is Ibn al-Marʾa’s feeling that certain mystical theories regarding the Divine names encroach upon the key tenet of Islam—tawḥīd, the belief in God’s unity. Was Ibn al-Marʾa correct? Can we detect polytheistic undertones in the mystical writings of Ibn Masarra and his Andalusī heirs, chief among them Muḥyī l-Dīn Ibn al-ʿArabī (560/1165–638/1240)? In what follows I shall attempt to address this question by highlighting several mythic elements in Ibn al-ʿArabī’s teachings on the Divine names. However, before I begin, two introductory remarks are in order. First, a detailed analysis of the diverse intellectual sources from which Ibn al-ʿArabī derived his teachings on the Divine names falls beyond the scope of the present article.4 Suffice it to say that these sources can be divided into six main groups: 1 Quoted in Massignon, Recueil, p. 70. On the possible contents of Tawḥīd al-mūqinīn and for a discussion of Ibn al-Marʾa’s quotation, see Stroumsa, “Ibn Masarra’s Third Book”. On Ibn al-Marʾa, Abū Isḥāq Ibrāhīm b. Yūsuf b. Muḥammad b. Dahhāq al-Awsī—a Mālikī faqīh, the- ologian, and Sufi who hailed from Malaga—see Urvoy, “Ibn al-Marʾa”. Finally, concerning the famous theologian al-Ǧuwaynī (d. 478/1085) and his Kitāb al-Iršād ilā qawāṭiʿ al-adilla fī uṣūl al-iʿtiqād (“The Book of Guidance to Peremptory Proofs Concerning the Principles of Faith”), see Brockelmann and Gardet, “al-Djuwaynī,”EI2, vol. 2, pp. 605–606. 2 See, for example, Ibn Barraǧān, Šarḥ asmāʾ Allāh, vol. 1, pp. 29–31, 409–410; Ibn Qasī, Ḫalʿ al- naʿlayni, pp. 257–266, 357, 379; Ibn al-ʿArabī, Futūḥāt, vol. 4, p. 467 (chapter 73, question 42); idem, Fuṣūṣ, pp. 79, 180. 3 See Ibn Masarra, Ḫawāṣṣ al-ḥurūf, pp. 58–61. 4 For basic introductions to Ibn al-ʿArabī’s thought (including his theories regarding the Divine Intellectual History of the IslamicateDownloaded World from 6 Brill.com09/29/2021 (2018) 359–387 04:16:55AM via free access “in truth you are the polytheist!” 361 1. Andalusī mystics, namely, Ibn Masarra, Ibn Barraǧān (d. 536/1141), and Ibn Qasī (d. 546/1151).5 2. Al-Ḥakīm al-Tirmiḏī (9th century), the idiosyncratic mystic from the East.6 3. Classical Sufism as it developed in the east up to Ibn al-ʿArabī’s time. 4. Theology (kalām). 5. Neoplatonic mystical philosophy, particularly as reflected in the Shiite- Ismāʿīlī Rasāʾil iḫwān al-ṣafāʾ (“The Epistles of the Sincere Brethren”) and in related works.7 6. Early Shiite traditions that deal with the high status of the Imam and his function as an intermediary between God and creation.8 The links between these diverse sources and al-Šayḫ al-akbar’s theories regard- ing the Divine names merit a separate discussion. Yet it seems to me—and the following argument can perhaps serve as a working hypothesis to be proven, modified, or refuted in future studies—that while the impact of eastern theol- ogy and Sufism on Ibn al-ʿArabī cannot be denied, Akbarian teachings on the Divine names are far removed from both these genres.9 In fact, Andalusī mys- ticism at large seems to mark a decisive shift from theology and Sufism alike to a more mythic and theosophical mode of thought. In the works of Ibn al-ʿArabī and his Andalusī predecessors, the Divine names are no longer approached from a strictly linguistic, hermeneutical, or logical perspective as in Islamic the- ology, nor do they pertain solely to the inner-psychological realm of the mystic, to his personal contact with God, as in many classical Sufi treatises. Rather, the Divine names are perceived as crucial elements of reality, as powers or forces that play a central role in cosmogonic and cosmological processes as well as in sacred human history; they signify the dynamic-manifest aspect of Divinity, names), see Affifi, Mystical Philosophy; Corbin, Creative Imagination; Chittick, Sufi Path; idem, Self-Disclosure; Chodkiewicz, Seal; see also http://www.ibnarabisociety.org/journals.html. 5 On Ibn Masarra see Ebstein, “Ibn Masarra,” EI3, and the references given there; on Ibn Barra- ǧān see Böwering and Casewit, A Qurʾān Commentary, pp. 1–45 (the Introduction in English); Casewit, “A reconsideration”; Casewit, The Mystics; and on Ibn Qasī see Ebstein, “Was Ibn Qasī a Ṣūfī?”. 6 On him see Sviri, Mystical Psychology; Radtke, al-Tirmiḏī. 7 See Ebstein, Mysticism, esp. pp. 146–151, 165–168. 8 Ibid. 9 One should bear in mind that various Sufi masters in the classical period, such as al-Kalābāḏī (d. 380s/990s), al-Qušayrī (d. 465/1072), and al-Ġazālī (d. 505/1111), were also theologians or were at least influenced by theology; on these figures see Karamustafa, Sufism, index. Intellectual History of the Islamicate World 6Downloaded (2018) 359–387 from Brill.com09/29/2021 04:16:55AM via free access 362 ebstein which is directly linked to creation and immanent within it.This shift in the way the Divine names are viewed is extremely significant for the self-image of the mystic and for his status and authority in society, given that he now functions as the main channel through which God’s attributes are manifested in the world or are revealed and interpreted; in other words, the mystic is responsible for the very connection between the Creator and creation, a connection embod- ied in the Divine attributes.10 Moreover, in his capacity as a mediator between the Divine and human realms, the mystic may even influence God Himself. I will return to this radical notion in the discussion below (pp. 374–379). Mythic Thought and Mysticism The second introductory remark concerns the term “mythic” employed in this essay. Definitions of “myth” and explanations of its importance and functions in human society and religiosity abound in modern scholarship.11 Strangely enough, the existence and significance of mythic thinking in classical Islamic mysticism have been by and large ignored in Western academia. One might contrast this unfortunate situation with the field of Jewish studies and specifi- cally Kabbalah scholarship, in which much research has been carried out on the relationship between religion and myth in general and between mysti- cism and mythic thought in particular.12 In the future I hope to address this issue with regard to Islamic mysticism in an in-depth study. For now, several points should be emphasized in order to clarify the premise of my discus- sion here. To begin with, one ought to distinguish between “mythology” and “mythic”. The former term signifies a cluster of stories (“myths”) dealing with issues such as gods and their relationships with human beings, the creation of the world, heroes and their ventures, the sacredness of specific geographi- cal spaces, the origins of social and religious institutions, and so forth; a good 10 To what degree the Andalusī shift described here was heralded by the teachings of cer- tain idiosyncratic Sufis in the east is a question that cannot be answered here.