Women but Not Sisters: Harriet A. Jacobs's Angered Literary Reply to Harriet B. Stowe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Rel'ista de Eswdíos Nortea111erica110.,, n." 61 /99R). pp. 35 - 50 WOMEN BUT NOT SISTERS: HARRIET A. JACOBS'S ANGERED LITERARY REPLY TO HARRIET B. STOWE CARME MANUEL Univcrsitat de Valencia Aftcr thc publication of Une/e 1rm1 's Cabin. Ralph Waldo Emerson said that the novel «encircled the globe, and was the only book that found readers in the parlor. thc nurscry, and the kitchcn in cvery household» (Gossett 165 ). Thc reaction of its readers was extraordinarily controverted. Whilc some cried their cyes out and wrote enthusiastic lcttcrs to the book publishers, others waved the war hatchet against Stowc's antislavcry work. Among other things. Uncle Tom ·.~ Cahin helped to build nationally and internationally an image of slavcry and Afro-American identity within the peculi ar institution. In fact. in her rcview on Dred-Stowe's second antislavcry novel- , Gcorgc Eliot dcclarcd that with both works «Mrs. Stowe has invented the black novel.» 1 Will iam Stanley Braithwaitc thought likewise in 1925. For this critic, Uncle Tom 's Cabin was «thc first conspicuous cxample of the Negro as a subjcct for litcrary trcatment. » (30) Literary replics by Afro-American writers did not take long to appear. According to Bernard W. Bell, thc nineteenth-century black authors who responded to the images of blacks created by white literature were mainly influcnced by the Bible, popular fiction. and especially abolitionist rhetoric, which became «by far the most useful tradition for thc didactic purposcs of black novelists.» The clcments ingrained in works such as U11cle Tom 's Cabin -«the formal diction, rhythmic cadenccs. balanced syntax, stark mctaphors, and clcvated tone ... - providcd the stylistic blcnd of matter-of-factness and sentimentali ty necessary for the ir initial moral and political appeals primarily to white readers.» (27-28) Richard Yarborough also analyses the impact of Une/e Tom 's Cahin 1. The Westmi11srer Review. October 1856. Quoted in Ammnns. Critica/ 43-44. 36 Carme Manuel on Afro-American ninetecnth-ccntury fiction since, whatcver attitude these writers felt towards Stowc or towards her novel, they «inevitably wrote in her wake.» This <loes not mean that they consciously created their works fol lowing this best-seller, but that thc novel «cmbodied a whole conste ll ation of preexisting, often conflicting ideas regarding racc, powcrfull y dramatized them in a sentimental fashion, presented them with an unabashedly didactic reformist message, and, linally proceeded to sell likc the dickens .» Al the same time, in providing a litcrary form and a whitc audiencc rcady to assimilate antislavcry protest, Stowc «also hclpcd to establish a range of character types that scrved to bind and restrict black authors for decades.» (72)~ Among the Afro-American works that directly responded to Stowe, it is importan! to mention Solomon Northup's Twelve Years a SI are ( 1853 ), Frederick Douglass's «The Heroic Slave» ( 1853) :md his re vi sed autobiography. My Bv11dage ami My Freedom ( 1855), as well as Martin Delany's Blake; 01; the Huts ofAm erica (1859), a novel which explicitly calls for a black revolutionary power.' Nineteenth-century Afro-American women writers also responded to Stowe. Elizabeth Ammons studies this influence in the work of Harriet E. Wilson, Sarah Lee Brown Fleming, Frances Ellen Watkins Hm·pcr and Angelina W. Grimké.4 This is just a samplc of Afro-American works writlen in the light of Stowe's novel, as thc list continued well into the twentieth-century.5 They come to demonstratc what Shelley. F. Fishkin calls «the interplay between Afro-American and white culture in the United States» and Wcrncr Sollors labels as «the pcrvasiveness of cultural syncretism in America.» ( 135, 141) Following their pathbreaking studies and retaking 2. Richard Yarborough states that «black writers could not help hut be convinced that if enough ofthe right ingrediems were combined in thc right proportions under the right conditions. thcy too could concoct deeply political novels that rnight tap the same rnass audience that Stowe did and thereby shape the altitudes of whites toward the black minority in the United States» (72). This critic studies this intluencc in sorne Afro-American authors: J. W. Howard"s Bond and Free: A True Tale ofS/m•e Times ( 1886). Frances Ellcn Watkins Harper's /ola Lemy. or Shaduws Uplífted ( 1892). Victoria Earle's IMatthews] A11111 Lind_\~ A Story Fowuled 011 Real Life ( 1892), Waltcr H . Stowers and William H. Anderson·s Appoí11ted ( 1894). and Charles W. Chesnutt's The Marrow of Tradilíon ( 1901 ). For William L. Andrews. Harriet Beechcr Stowe «provided a powerful impetus to the revolution of literary priorities that would impel black autobiographers further and further away from white precedents» ( 179). 3. About the ways Douglass revises Stowe in My Bonda¡¡e mzd Mv Freedom, see Sundquist, New Essays 17-18. and also the chapter «Signs of Power: Nat Tumer ami Frcderick Douglass» in his To Wake the Nations (27- 134). Likcwise Robert B. Stcpm's «Sharing thc Thunden> makes a comparison between Une/e Tom"s Cabi11 and Douglass's «The Heroic Slave», asan example of textual conversation on antislavery rhetoric. On the other hand. Sundquist considers Blake as a literary reply to Stowc, Douglass, ami Melville ( «Conspiracy» 54). See al so the second chaptcr of 7ii Wake the Nlllio11s. «Mclville, Delany, and New World Slavery» ( 135-224 ). 4 . Anunons analyses the work of these writers as a rcflection and reconstruction of the maternal theme in Unde Tom"s Cabi11. Scc «Stowc's Dream». 5 . Anmng the hest known are, for cxample. Richard Wright"s U11cle Trmr 's Children ( 1938). lshmael Reed's A Flight 10 Canada ( 1976) and Toni M orrison ·s Beloved ( 1987). Women Rut No! Sisters: Harriet A. Jacohs's A11xered Literary Rep/y to Harriet 8. Stoll'e 37 Toni Morrison 's call to literary researchers «to acknowledge the very mixcd Ji terary bloodlines on both sides». I will discuss that Harrict A. J acobs 's bzcidents in the Lije of a Slave Girl: Writte11 by Herselfwas also wrilten in thc wakc of Stowc's extraordinarily popular best-scller. Thc aim of this essay is to analysc how Jacobs manages to fashion a rnultiple representation in her text that is directly related to the literary modes employed by Harriet Beecher Stowe in Uncle Tom 's Cabi11. and that they shape not only the presentation of her experience but. also and most importantly, the ways in which she cxpects to impact readers. In 1861 Harrict A. Jacobs, after endless cfforts to find a publishcr, brought out /ncidems in the Lije v.f a SI ave Girl: Written hy Herseif on her own, hut soon after, thc book and its author fell into oblivion. The fcw critics who knew aboul it thought it a dictated narrative by a fugitive slavc; others bclicved il to be a fictional account written in thc form of a slave narrative by a white abolition i st.~ In both cases it was dismissed altogether as a poorly writtcn work marred by its sentimentality and moralizing. Not until Jean Fagan Yell in 's research authenticated Jacobs's authorship did the hook start to receive its due scholarly attention. Jean F. Yellin explains that «it is no accident that man y critics mistook Jacobs 's narrativc for fiction. » ( «Introduction» xxix) Linda Brcnt, Jacobs's alter-ego and her book's heroine and narrator, tells an ambiguous story of triumph. Her confessional account of her fall and guilt is presentecl to thc rcader to be judged in thc same way as thc helpless virtuous Richardsonian or Rowsonian heroine. But this is only apparently becausc, even if it is undoubtedly true thal the strategies Jacobs uti lizes in her narrative clraw inspirntion from well-known popular fiction devices, Une/e Tom '.~ Cabin is the book she responds to and, in her attcmpt to give a true and jusl account of the evils of slavery for women. shc suhverts Harrict Bcecher Stowe's tcxt and gives form lo her black voice. The relationship betwcen Jacobs and Stowc can be considered from a twofold pcrspectivc: from a pcrsonal-professional point of view and from a Iitcrary stance. Jacobs was fully awarc of the importance of Stowe and of the lcgitimizing powcr that her voice could con fer to her own story if the whitc wri tcr accepted to actas a mediator in producing a dictatcd narrativc. Bul she did not come up to Jacobs's cxpectations. According to Joan D. Hedrick, «publicly succcssful, Stowe was not as skillful and scnsitive in a private antislavery rnattcr.» (248) First. Stowe dcclined Jacobs's proposal of her daughters' accornpanying her to England. Moreover, she did not believe Jacobs's 6. John Blassingame is regardcd to he onc of the most importalll male scholars who eslablished this train of thought in his Tf1e Slnn! Comm1111ity: P/amatio11 Lije i11 the A11tebel/11111 Sowh ( 1979). For 131assingame. «thc story is too melodramatic: misccgcnation and cruelty, outragcd vi1iue, unrequited love. and planter licentiousness appear on practically every page» (373). Carby rcplies to his opinion in 45-6. Yellin prescnts a summary of the different positions defended by schnlars in «Tcxts and Contexts». For a discussion of the factors influencing thc acceptance of a slave narrator's voicc as authentic, secAndrcws 1-7. 22-:l l. 97-105. 38 Carme Ma11uel autobiographical narrativc at her first readi ng and sent it to Mrs. Willis, Jacobs·s white northern employcr, for verification. If it turncd out to be true, then she would use it as material for her Key to Uncle Tom 's Cabin. Jacob s's strategy of hiding in the attic was strikingly similar to thc trick Cassy devised to chcat Legree, and Stowe hoped to use it to corroborate her fiction.