Новости Сист. Низш. Раст. 51 — Novosti Sist. Nizsh. Rast. 51

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Новости Сист. Низш. Раст. 51 — Novosti Sist. Nizsh. Rast. 51 Новости сист. низш. раст. — Novosti Sist. Nizsh. Rast. 51: 242–250. 2017 Gemmae in Tetralophozia setiformis (Anastrophyllaceae, Marchantiophyta) and their second record in Eurasia M. V. Dulin Institute of Biology, Komi Science Centre UB RAS, Kommunisticheskaja Str., 28, Syktyvkar, Komi Republic, 167982, Russia; [email protected] Abstract. Tetralophozia setiformis is a widespread species occurring usually with- out organs of sexual and asexual reproduction. Gemmae of Tetralophozia setiformis were observed for the second time in Russia and Eurasia in the Northern Urals, Komi Republic. They form compact masses over upper leaves. The compact masses consist largely (70 %) of immature gemmae. Description of gemmae and gemmiparous shoots from the Northern Urals and their comparison with those from the other known locali- ties, namely British Columbia (Canada) and the Murmansk Region (European Russia) were carried out. The gemmiparous plants of T. setiformis from the Northern Urals have approximately the same width as plants without gemmae but they are shorter. The leaves of gemmiparous plants from the Northern Urals are similar to leaves of gemmiparous plants from British Columbia. The leaf shape in upper part of the gem- miparous shoots varies from the typical to ± modifi ed from gemmae production. These leaf shape transitions include reduction of leaf size and lobe number from 4 to 2–3, suppression of development and disappearance of characteristic teeth at the base of sinus. Gemmae size (17 × 22 μm) of plants from the Northern Urals is within vari- ability recorded for plants from the Murmansk Region and British Columbia. Keywords: gemmae, liverworts, Tetralophozia setiformis, British Columbia, Mur- mansk Region, Northern Urals, Komi Republic, Russia. Выводковые почки у Tetralophozia setiformis (Anastrophyllaceae, Marchantiophyta) и их вторая находка в Евразии М. В. Дулин Институт биологии Коми НЦ УрО РАН, ул. Коммунистическая, д. 28, г. Сыктывкар, 167982, Россия; [email protected] Резюме. Tetralophozia setifomis — широко распространенный вид, обычно встречающийся в вегетативном состоянии без органов полового и бесполого размножения. Описана вторая находка выводковых почек T. setifomis в России и Евразии и первая на Северном Урале, в Республике Коми. Приведено описа- ние найденных на Северном Урале выводковых почек, побегов, образующих выводковые почки, и их сравнение с данными из двух других известных место- нахождений в Британской Колумбии (Канада) и Мурманской области (Россия). Почкующиеся побеги приблизительно такие же по ширине, но более короткие, с выводковыми почками на верхних листьях в плотных скоплениях, которые об- разованы преимущественно (на 70 %) недозрелыми выводковыми почками. Ли- стья побегов с выводковыми почками с Северного Урала сходны с таковыми из Британской Колумбии. Описаны переходы формы листьев с верхушек почкую- 242 Dulin. Gemmae in Tetralophozia setiformis щихся побегов от типичных до формирующих выводковые почки, у которых на- блюдалось наряду с уменьшением размеров уменьшение числа лопастей от 4 до 2–3 также уменьшение и исчезновение характерных зубцов в основании выре- зок. Выводковые почки растений с Северного Урала по размерам (17 × 22 мкм) соответствуют ранее выявленному диапазону изменчивости этого признака, но максимальная длина у них меньше. Ключевые слова: выводковые почки, печеночники, Tetralophozia setifomis, Британская Колумбия, Мурманская область, Северный Урал, Республика Коми, Россия. The genus Tetralophozia (R. M. Schust.) Schljakov of the fami- ly Anastrophyllaceae L. Söderstr., De Roo et Hedd. includes four spe- cies known from Arctic to tropical latitudes in Asia and Africa (Schus- ter, 2002; Söderström et al., 2010; Söderström et al., 2016). The type of the genus, an arctic-alpine imperfectly circumpolar species T. setiformis (Ehrh.) Schljakov [≡ Chandonanthus setiformis (Ehrh.) Lindb.] is most widespread in the Northern Hemisphere (Konstantinova, 2000; Damsholt, 2002; Schumacker, Váňa, 2005; Konstantinova et al., 2009). Of the four species currently recognized in the genus Tetralophozia (Söderström et al., 2016), gemmae are known only in this species (Schuster, 2002). The plants of T. setiformis are fragile when dry and usually dissemi- nate via fragments. They produce sporophytes and gemmae very rarely. The gemmae were fi rst recognized by Godfrey and Godfrey (1978) from W. B. Schofi eld’s collections obtained from British Columbia. In recent European liverwort identifi cation books (Schljakov, 1980; Damsholt, 2002) there are no description of gemmae. Konstantinova (2002) in her treatment of the genus Tetralophozia for Russia briefl y described and il- lustrated gemmae of T. setiformis for the fi rst time for Eurasia from the Murmansk Region, Northwest European Russia, however, this reference tends to be overlooked. Then, Damsholt (2013) mentioned that gemmae in T. setiformis are known only from western Canada. In 2016 gemmae of T. setiformis were observed in a collection from the Northern Urals (Komi Republic) that represent the second record of the gemmae in T. setiformis in Eurasia. The purpose of the present paper is to summarize known data on the gemmae of T. setiformis and to provide comparisons from three known distant localities, illustrations and analysis of conditions of their formation. Materials and Methods Habitats and reproduction of Tetralophozia setiformis in the Northern Urals. In the Northern Urals, T. setiformis grows on and be- tween stones at stony fi elds, as well as in small holes and cracks with fi ne 243 Новости сист. низш. раст. — Novosti Sist. Nizsh. Rast. 51: 242–250. 2017 earth in rocky outcrops (remnants and cliffs). It rarely occurs on stones in dwarf-shrub and lichen tundra and on stones along mountain streams. It occurs also on stones in upland light forests, fi r-spruce forests and bushes of Betula nana L. The species occurs in large compact patches or tufts, usually with greenish-, yellowish- or golden-brown to dark brown pig- mentation or as single shoots among other bryophytes such as Tritomaria quinquedentata (Huds.) H. Buch, Sphenolobus minutus (Schreb.) Berggr. Many populations of T. setiformis were observed earlier in the Komi Re- public without organs of sexual or asexual reproduction and reproduce apparently by parts of the shoots and leaf fragments. Plants of T. setifor- mis are very fragile during dry periods and disseminated by wind, ani- mals, etc. Location of gemmiparous plants of Tetralophozia setiformis in the Northern Urals. Russia: Komi Republic, Northern Urals, Vuktylsky Dis- trict, «Yugyd Va» National Park, the Shchugor River basin, near Halmer- sale Mountain, 3 km SWW of the merger of sources of Halmerya River, 63°48ʹ56.8ʺN; 59°10ʹ48.5ʺE, ca. 715 m alt., lake cirque, steep (45–60°) slope of the cirque, NE exposure, rock outcrops, on ledge in yellowish- brown patches with whitish patches of degraded shoots, 01.07.2016 M. V. Dulin 3ha=1237mvd, SYKO. Gemmiparous shoots were studied using microscopes LOMO MBS 10 and Micmed-2. Shoots were measured after moistening. Prepared leaves and gemmae were selected in separate specimen fi xed by glycerin after microscopy. All observed gemmae (80) and 22 leaves were measured and kept after investigation as separate slides. Maximum values and mean values were calculated on the basis of the obtained measurements. Results Only two gemmiparous shoots of T. setiformis were observed in the specimen cited above. It should be noted that the specimen looks atypical. It contains the plants growing parallel to each other and assembled in compact patches with shoots spread in different directions and interwoven. The latter shoots are shorter and curved. Besides, the main part of plants (up to 50 %) in the specimen has features of degradation expressed in partial or complete yellowing of the plants. It is diffi cult to understand the reasons of such degradation. But, possibly, one of the reasons is being adjacent to the lichen Cladonia coccinifera (L.) Willd. that may affect the plants of T. setiformis by releasing lichen acids characterized by a high antibiotic activity. Such unfavorable condition resulted in degradation of T. setiformis may have initiated gemmae formation in the studied plants. 244 Dulin. Gemmae in Tetralophozia setiformis Description of gemmiparous plants and gemmae of Tetralophozia setiformis from the Northern Urals (Plate I). The gemmiparous plants of T. setiformis are golden-green to brown. They are smaller in size than non-gemmiparous plants from the same specimen (Table). At the old part of shoots they are 590–760 μm wide, in upper younger narrowed part of the shoots — 320 μm wide and 0.8–1.0 cm long. The leaves of gemmiparous shoots are divided for 0.7–0.9 their length into 3–4 lobes, × 1.0–1.5 as wide as long, 430–700 μm wide × 420–630 μm long; middle leaf lobes are × 1.2–1.9 as long as wide, 310–350 μm long × 160–270 μm wide. At the younger narrowed part of shoots, leaves × 1.0–1.1 as wide as long, 270–320 μm wide × 270–290 long; middle leaf lobes × 1.7–1.8 as long as wide, 170–180 μm long × 100–110 μm wide. Table Variability of morphological features of Tetralophozia setiformis in collections with gemmae Regions Features Murmansk Northern Urals British Columbia Region Nongemmiparous 0.6–1.5 to 6.0 1.6–4.0 shoot length, cm Nongemmiparous (430)540–590(760) (500)700–1100 (680)760–975 shoot width, mm Nongemmiparous (380)430–790(860) to 1000 (770)825–1075 leaf width, μm Nongemmiparous (320)380–540 400–600 (425)450–600 leaf length, μm Nongemmiparous 1.2–1.6 1.7 1.6–2.0 leaf, width/length ratio Gemmiparous shoot 0.8–1.0 «small», no 1.5–2.6 length, cm length mentioned Gemmiparous shoot (320) 590–760 «small», no 400–600(760) width, mm width mentioned Gemmiparous leaf (270–320)430–700 — 350–550 width, μm Gemmiparous leaf (270–290)420–630 — 275–420 length, μm Gemmiparous leaf, 1.0–1.5 — 1.1–1.5 width/length ratio Gemmae size, μm mature: (10)13–18(23) × mature 17–20 × 10–26 × 16–44 (13)18–23(31); 20–30(45) immature: (13)16–18 × (16)18–26(33); juvenile: (13)16–18(21) × (16)18–26(31) 245 Новости сист.
Recommended publications
  • Article ISSN 1179-3163 (Online Edition)
    Phytotaxa 63: 21–68 (2012) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2012 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Early Land Plants Today: Index of Liverworts & Hornworts 2009–2010 LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, ANDERS HAGBORG2, MARSHALL R. CROSBY3 & MATT VON KONRAT2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] 2 Department of Botany, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605–2496, U.S.A.;[email protected], [email protected] 3 Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166–0299 U.S.A.; [email protected] Abstract A widely accessible list of known plant species is a fundamental requirement for plant conservation and has vast applications. An index of published names of liverworts and hornworts between 2009 and 2010 is provided as part of a continued effort in working toward producing a world checklist of this group. Included in the list are also names overlooked by earlier indices. The list includes 30 higher taxa, 250 species, 52 infraspecific taxa, 31 autonyms, and two fossils for 2009 and 2010. A number of taxa not covered by the earlier indices for 2000-2008 are also included. Key words: Liverworts, hornworts, index, nomenclature Introduction Under the auspices of the Early Land Plants Today project, there has been a strong community-driven effort attempting to address the critical need to synthesize the vast nomenclatural, taxonomic and global distributional data for liverworts (Marchantiophyta) and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) (von Konrat et al. 2010a). These endeavours are critical in providing the foundation to develop a working checklist of liverworts and hornworts worldwide; the first version is projected to be published in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytotaxa, Taxonomic Novelties Resulting from Recent Reclassification of the Lophoziaceae
    Phytotaxa 3: 47–53 (2010) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Article PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2010 • Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Taxonomic novelties resulting from recent reclassification of the Lophoziaceae/ Scapaniaceae clade LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, RYAN DE ROO2 & TERRY HEDDERSON2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway email: [email protected] 2 Bolus Herbarium, Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa email: [email protected] Abstract A new family, Anastrophyllaceae, is segregated from Lophoziaceae, two new genera, Neoorthocaulis and Oleolophozia are described and the following new combinations are made: Neoorthocaulis attenuatus, N. binsteadii, N. floerkei, N. hyperboreus, Barbilophozia subgen. Sudeticae, Barbilophozia sudetica and Oleolophozia perssonii. Key words: Anastrophyllaceae, liverworts, Neoorthocaulis, Oleolophozia, Barbilophozia Introduction The Lophoziaceae has previously been either recognized as a separate family (e.g. Grolle & Long 2000) or placed in the synonymy of Jungermanniaceae (e.g. Damsholt 2002). Recent molecular work (De Roo et al. 2007) has shown that the two are not particularly closely related and that Lophoziaceae should be retained as a separate family. However, molecular data (Schill et al. 2004) also show that the family Scapaniaceae is nested within Lophoziaceae, a pattern confirmed by, inter alia, Yatsentyuk et al. (2004), Davis (2004) and De Roo et al. (2007). Those studies also exclude two elements frequently included in Lophoziaceae in the past— the family Jamesoniellaceae and the genus Leiocolea (Müller 1913: 711) Buch (1933: 288). However, some recent studies (De Roo et al. 2007 and unpublished results by R.
    [Show full text]
  • PLANT SCIENCE Bulletin SUMMER 2015 Volume 61 Number 2
    PLANT SCIENCE Bulletin SUMMER 2015 Volume 61 Number 2 1st place triarch botanical images student travel awards Jennifer dixon, iowa state university Flowers from eragrostis cilianensis (stinkgrass) In This Issue.............. Post-doc unionization at the Naomi Volain honored as a Award winners announced for University of California... p. 40 top 10 nominee for the Global Botany 2015.... p. 30 Teacher Prize.... p. 58 From the Editor PLANT SCIENCE As the Summer 2015 Plant Science Bulletin goes to press, many of us are transitioning from the spring BULLETIN semester into the summer. I find this an especially Editorial Committee bittersweet time of year as I wrap up classes and say goodbye to Creighton’s graduating seniors. It is a time Volume 61 to reflect on the past academic year, celebrate achieve- ments, and eat University-catered petit fours. Carolyn M. Wetzel Fortunately, this time of year also means honoring (2015) members of the Botanical Society with well-earned Biology Department awards. In this issue, we are proud to announce the Division of Health and winners of the Kaplan Memorial Lecture and Public Natural Sciences Policy Awards. We also present the winners of sev- Holyoke Community College eral student awards, including the Karling and BSA 303 Homestead Ave Graduate Student Research, Undergraduate Stu- Holyoke, MA 01040 dent Research, Cheadle Travel, and Young Botanist [email protected] Awards. You can find the winning Triarch images on pages 33-34 and I encourage you to view all the Tri- arch submissions at http://botany.org/PlantImages/ ConantSTA2015.php. Lindsey K. Tuominen Congratulations to all of these commendable (2016) botanists! The Society will be considering many ad- Warnell School of Forestry & ditional awards over the next few months and we will Natural Resources profile more winners in the Fall issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List - Kenai - U.S
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List - Kenai - U.S. Fish and Wild... http://www.fws.gov/refuge/Kenai/wildlife_and_habitat/species_list.html Kenai National Wildlife Refuge | Alaska Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List Below is a checklist of the species recorded on the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge. The list of 1865 species includes 34 mammals, 154 birds, one amphibian, 20 fish, 611 arthropods, 7 molluscs, 11 other animals, 493 vascular plants, 180 bryophytes, 29 fungi, and 325 lichens. Of the total number of species, 1771 are native, 89 are non-native, and five include both native and non-native subspecies. Non-native species are indicated by dagger symbols (†) and species having both native and non-native subspecies are indicated by double dagger symbols (‡). Fifteen species no longer occur on the Refuge, indicated by empty set symbols ( ∅). Data were updated on 15 October 2015. See also the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge checklist on iNaturalist.org ( https://www.inaturalist.org/check_lists/188476-Kenai-National-Wildlife- Refuge-Check-List ). Mammals ( #1 ) Birds ( #2 ) Amphibians ( #3 ) Fish ( #4 ) Arthropods ( #5 ) Molluscs ( #6 ) Other Animals ( #7 ) Vascular Plants ( #8 ) Other Plants ( #9 ) Fungi ( #10 ) Lichens ( #11 ) Change Log ( #changelog ) Mammals () Phylum Chordata Class Mammalia Order Artiodactyla Family Bovidae 1. Oreamnos americanus (Blainville, 1816) (Mountain goat) 2. Ovis dalli Nelson, 1884 (Dall's sheep) Family Cervidae 3. Alces alces (Linnaeus, 1758) (Moose) 4. Rangifer tarandus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Caribou) Order Carnivora Family Canidae 5. Canis latrans Say, 1823 (Coyote) 6. Canis lupus Linnaeus, 1758 (Gray wolf) 7. Vulpes vulpes (Linnaeus, 1758) (Red fox) Family Felidae 8. Lynx lynx (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lynx) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge's Species List
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2017-06-30 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff June 30, 2017 2 Cover images represent changes to the checklist. Top left: Halobi- sium occidentale observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (https://www. inaturalist.org/observations/6565787). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Top right: Aegialites alaskaensis observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/6612922). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Bottom left: Fucus distichus observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/6612338). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Bottom right: Littorina subrotundata observed at Gull Rock, June 8, 2017 (http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/6612398). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 24 Vascular Plants........................................................ 47 Bryophytes .......................................................... 59 Chromista........................................................... 63 Fungi ............................................................. 63 Protozoa............................................................ 72 Non-native species 73
    [Show full text]
  • XX. SCAPANIACEAE Migula Alan T. Whittemore Plants Forming Mats Or Turfs Or Spreading from Substrate
    BFNA Title: Scapaniaceae Author: Provisional Publication Date:Dec. 4, 2020 Edit Level: S Version: 1 Bryophyte Flora of North America, Provisional Publication Missouri Botanical Garden BFNA Web site: http://www.mobot.org/plantscience/BFNA/bfnamenu.htm Notice Return to Home XX. SCAPANIACEAE Migula Alan T. Whittemore Plants forming mats or turfs or spreading from substrate; branches sometimes intercalary from sides of stem, sometimes replacing ventral half of a leaf; usually without flagella. Leaves alternate, succubous, sometimes succubous ventrally and transverse or incubous dorsally, plane, concave, or folded, always lobed, entire or toothed; underleaves very rarely present on sterile shoot sectors. Rhizoids scattered over ventral stem. Specialized asexual reproduction by1-- 2(--3)-celled gemmae, common on margins of ordinary leaves. Gynoecium terminal on an ordinary leafy branch. Perianth with or without subfloral branches, well developed, cylindrical and smooth or plicate or flattened, mouth wide or somewhat narrowed, perigynium absent. Genera ca. 35, species ca. 350 (15 genera, 114 species in the flora): cosmopolitan, except Antarctica. Scapaniaceae is one of the largest families of liverworts, found worldwide but speciose in cool- temperate to arctic regions of the Northern Hemisphere. Species of Scapaniaceae form an important part of the vegetation in arctic, boreal, and high-altitude floras around the Northern Hemisphere. The name Scapaniaceae was originally used only for the group of genera with leaves sharply folded together along a median keel (Scapania, Diplophyllum, Macrodiplophyllum, and Douinia). This is virtually the only grouping in the broad family that is well-defined and recognizable. The bulk of the species in the family have plane or concave leaves and were traditionally placed in a separate family Lophoziaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, Version 2017-12-22
    Kenai National Wildlife Refuge Species List, version 2017-12-22 Kenai National Wildlife Refuge biology staff December 22, 2017 2 Cover images represent changes to the checklist. Top left: Psilo- carphus elatior, Mystery Creek Road, August 2, 2017 (https: //www:inaturalist:org/observations/9139348). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Top right: Mermis nigrescens at Headquarters Lake, October 11, 2017 (http://arctos:database:museum/media/10570362). Image CC0 Matt Bowser. Bottom left: Dichelotarsus laevicollis near Headquarters Lake, June 30, 2017 (http://arctos:database:museum/media/10572462). Image CC0 Matt Bowser. Bottom right: Drepanocladus longifolius at Headquarters Lake, April 10, 2015 (https://www:inaturalist:org/ photos/1708594). Image CC BY Matt Bowser. Contents Contents 3 Introduction 5 Purpose............................................................ 5 About the list......................................................... 5 Acknowledgments....................................................... 5 Native species 7 Vertebrates .......................................................... 7 Invertebrates ......................................................... 25 Vascular Plants........................................................ 52 Bryophytes .......................................................... 67 Other Plants ......................................................... 72 Chromista........................................................... 72 Fungi ............................................................. 72 Protozoa...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article in PDF Format
    cryptogamie Bryologie 2021 ● 42 ● 6 DIRECTEUR DE LA PUBLICATION / PUBLICATION DIRECTOR : Bruno David, Président du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle RÉDACTEUR EN CHEF / EDITOR-IN-CHIEF : Denis LAMY ASSISTANTE DE RÉDACTION / ASSISTANT EDITOR : Marianne SALAÜN ([email protected]) MISE EN PAGE / PAGE LAYOUT : Marianne SALAÜN RÉDACTEURS ASSOCIÉS / ASSOCIATE EDITORS Biologie moléculaire et phylogénie / Molecular biology and phylogeny Bernard GOFFINET Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut (United States) Mousses d’Europe / European mosses Isabel DRAPER Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) Francisco LARA GARCÍA Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) Mousses d’Afrique et d’Antarctique / African and Antarctic mosses Rysiek OCHYRA Laboratory of Bryology, Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow (Pologne) Bryophytes d’Asie / Asian bryophytes Rui-Liang ZHU School of Life Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai (China) Bioindication / Biomonitoring Franck-Olivier DENAYER Faculté des Sciences Pharmaceutiques et Biologiques de Lille, Laboratoire de Botanique et de Cryptogamie, Lille (France) Écologie des bryophytes / Ecology of bryophyte Nagore GARCÍA MEDINA Department of Biology (Botany), and Centro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain) COUVERTURE / COVER : Trichocolea tomentella (Ehrh.)
    [Show full text]
  • Marchantiophyta, Order Jungermanniales: Cephaloziineae 1
    Glime, J. M. 2021. Aquatic and Wet Marchantiophyta, Order Jungermanniales: Cephaloziineae 1. Chapter 1-2. In: Glime, J. M. 1-2-1 Bryophyte Ecology. Volume 4. Habitat and Role. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 24 May 2021 and available at <http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. CHAPTER 1-2 AQUATIC AND WET MARCHANTIOPHYTA, ORDER JUNGERMANNIALES: CEPHALOZIINEAE 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Adelanthaceae........................................................................................................................................................................ 1-2-3 Cuspidatula flexicaulis................................................................................................................................................... 1-2-3 Syzygiella sonderi .......................................................................................................................................................... 1-2-3 Anastrophyllaceae.................................................................................................................................................................. 1-2-4 Anastrophyllum assimile ................................................................................................................................................ 1-2-4 Anastrophyllum michauxii ............................................................................................................................................. 1-2-5 Barbilophozia
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Classification of the Marchantiophyta
    E D I N B U R G H J O U R N A L O F B O T A N Y 66 (1): 155–198 (2009) 155 Ó Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh (2009) doi:10.1017/S0960428609005393 PHYLOGENY AND CLASSIFICATION OF THE MARCHANTIOPHYTA B. CRANDALL-STOTLER1 ,R.E.STOTLER1 &D.G.LONG2 Input from molecular phylogenetics in the past five years has substantially altered concepts of systematic relationships among liverworts. While these studies have confirmed the monophyly of phylum Marchantiophyta, they have demonstrated that many previously recognised ranks within the hierarchy are unnatural and in need of modification. Changes in the ranks of suborder and above have been proposed by various workers, but modifications in the circumscription of genera and families are still required. A comprehensive, phylogenetic classification scheme that integrates morphological data with molecular hypotheses is presented. The scheme includes diagnoses and publication citations for all names above the rank of genus. All currently recognised genera are listed alphabetically in their respective families; subfamilies are not indicated. Major modifications and novel alignments of taxa are thoroughly discussed, with pertinent references provided. Jungermanniaceae is redefined and Solenostomataceae fam. nov. is formally described to accommodate some of the genera excluded from it. Keywords. Classification scheme, family diagnoses, liverworts. Introduction Historically, classification schemes have been intuitively constructed to show re- lationships among organisms based upon degree of morphological similarity or difference. Major changes in classification generally reflected the addition of newly discovered organisms and new interpretations of anatomical characters. In Species Plantarum, the starting point for liverwort nomenclature, Linnaeus (1753) recog- nised the single genus Jungermannia to comprise both leafy and simple thalloid taxa, relegated the complex thalloid taxa to Targionia, Marchantia and Riccia, and associated Blasia with the complex thalloid group by placing it between Marchantia and Riccia.
    [Show full text]
  • D7bedeb08b27c78eb72a779c8b
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 59: 1–828 (2016) World checklist of hornworts and liverworts 1 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.59.6261 CHECKLIST http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research World checklist of hornworts and liverworts Lars Söderström1,*, Anders Hagborg2,*, Matt von Konrat2,*, Sharon Bartholomew-Began3, David Bell4, Laura Briscoe2, Elizabeth Brown5, †, D. Christine Cargill6, Denise P. Costa7, Barbara J. Crandall-Stotler8, Endymion D. Cooper9, Gregorio Dauphin10, John J. Engel2, Kathrin Feldberg11, David Glenny12, S. Robbert Gradstein13, Xiaolan He14, Jochen Heinrichs11, Jörn Hentschel15, Anna Luiza Ilkiu-Borges16, Tomoyuki Katagiri17, Nadezhda A. Konstantinova18, Juan Larraín2, David G. Long19, Martin Nebel20, Tamás Pócs21, Felisa Puche22, Elena Reiner-Drehwald23, Matt A.M. Renner5, Andrea Sass-Gyarmati21, Alfons Schäfer-Verwimp24, José Gabriel Segarra Moragues25, Raymond E. Stotler8, †, Phiangphak Sukkharak26, Barbara M. Th iers27, Jaime Uribe28, Jiří Váňa29, Juan Carlos Villarreal30, Martin Wigginton31, Li Zhang32, Rui-Liang Zhu33 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway 2 Department of Science and Education, Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605– 2496, United States of America 3 Department of Biology, West Chester University, West Chester, PA 19383, United States of America 4 Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada 5 Royal Botanic Gardens
    [Show full text]
  • Of Bryophytes 2001–2004
    Index of Bryophytes 2001–2004 Marshall R. Crosby Robert E. Magill Authors’ addresses: Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166 U.S.A. [email protected] [email protected] Printed in an edition of 200 and distributed free until supply is exhausted. This index may currently be downloaded as a pdf file. Go to http://www.mobot.org/mobot/tropicos/most/welcome.shtml and find Index of Bryophytes in the list under Bryology. © Missouri Botanical Garden, 2005. All rights reserved. Sidre Presse, Sugar Grove, North Carolina INTRODUCTION For new names the “Replaced name” and the “Blocking name” that prevents the reuse of an In this index we attempt to list, in an epithet are indicated. abbreviated form, the citations for names Orthotrichum jetteae B. H. Allen, 2002: 639. Replaced published for bryophytes: between January 1, name: Orthomitrium tuberculatum Lewinsky- 2001 and December 31, 2004 for hepatics and Haapasaari & Crosby, 1996. Blocking name: January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2004 for Orthotrichum tuberculatum Mitt., 1869. mosses, synchronizing the indexes for mosses and Names preceded by an asterisk (*) are hepatics (Crosby & Engel, 2005; Crosby & interpreted by us as contrary to the St. Louis Code Magill, 2004). All ranks are included. We also list (Greuter et al., 2000): *Anastrophyllum sect. Hypocladopsis R. M. Schust., some names that were overlooked in previous 2002b: 315, invalid, no Latin description. indexes and some corrections to previous indexes. Later homonyms have their earlier We have adopted an abbreviated style for homonyms indicated as “Earlier name”: several reasons. First, it allows us to compile the *Jungermannia polycarpa Gao Chien & Bai Xue-liang, index from the data accumulated by us and 2001: 147.
    [Show full text]