Phylogenetic Position of the East Asian Endemic Genus Hattoria (Anastrophyllaceae) Based on Chloroplast DNA Sequences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Phylogenetic Position of the East Asian Endemic Genus Hattoria (Anastrophyllaceae) Based on Chloroplast DNA Sequences Hattoria 9: 41–52. 2018 Phylogenetic position of the East Asian endemic genus Hattoria (Anastrophyllaceae) based on chloroplast DNA sequences Tomoyuki KATAGIRI & Yuya INOUE Hattori Botanical Laboratory, Obi 6–1–26, Nichinan City, Miyazaki 889–2535, Japan Author for correspondence: Tomoyuki KATAGIRI, [email protected] Abstract The phylogenetic position of the East Asian monospecific genus Hattoria has been controversial since its description in 1961. Over the years it has been considered as either a member of subfam. Jamesonielloideae in Lophoziaceae/Jungermanniaceae, subfam. Jungermannioideae in Jungermanniaceae, or Anastrophyllaceae, due to its morphological characters related to the genera with unlobed leaves, such as Jamesoniella, Scaphophyllum or Gottschelia. In the present study we provide molecular evidence that supports its inclusion in the family Anastrophyllaceae and Hattoria as a distinct genus resolved and nested in a Tetralophozia–Plicanthus clade. Our phylogenetic analyses suggest that unique morphological characters, such as unlobed and entire leaves and bracts shown in Hattoria, be considered an autapomorphy for the genus/species and also support recognition of the genus Hattoria as distinct from the other genera of the family. Some sporophyte characters including morphology of the seta are newly given for Hattoria yakushimensis (Horik.) R.M.Schust. Introduction Hattoria R.M.Schust. is a monospecific leafy liverwort genus endemic to East Asia. The generitype, Hattoria yakushimensis (Horik.) R.M.Schust., was originally described from Yakushima Island as Anastrophyllum yakushimense by Horikawa (1934). Based on its unique morphological characters the new genus, Hattoria, was proposed in Lophoziaceae s.lat. by Schuster (1961). These characters include: (1) unlobed and entire leaves and bracts, (2) strongly concave leaves mostly hyaline-margined, (3) lack of underleaves and bracteoles, (4) lack of gemmae, (5) exclusively intercalary branching, (6) distally pluriplicate perianths with the mouth contracted. However, the systematic placement of the genus has fluctuated over the last five decades. Kitagawa (1965, 1966) and Inoue (1966, 1974) supported Schuster's treatment of Hattoria in Lophoziaceae, and Hattoria was considered to be closely related to Jamesoniella or Gottschelia and placed in Lophoziaceae subfam. Jamesonielloideae. Schuster (1970) suggested its close relationships to the monospecific genus Scaphophyllum of Jungermanniaceae subfam. Scaphophylloideae, but later he included Hattoria in Jungermanniaceae subfam. Jamesonielloideae (Schuster 1979). Grolle (1971) and Váňa (1973) removed Hattoria from Jungermanniaceae subfam. Jamesonielloideae and assigned it to the 41 Jungermanniaceae subfam. Jungermannioideae, while Crandall-Stotler et al. (2009) included Hattoria in Scapaniaceae s.lat. with Lophozia and Anastrophyllum. Recent molecular evidence has given a narrower circumscription of the families Lophoziaceae and Scapaniaceae, and the new family Anastrophyllaceae was proposed by Söderström et al. (2010). The three genera, Jamesoniella, Scaphophyllum, and Gottschelia, which have been considered to be related to Hattoria, were all segregated from Lophoziaceae based on molecular evidence. Jamesoniella was revealed to be paraphyletic and synonymized in Syzygiella and placed in Adelanthaceae (De Roo et al. 2007; Feldberg et al. 2010). Scaphophyllum was synonymized in Solenostoma (Feldberg et al. 2009), and the generitype Gottschelia schizopleura was considered to belong Scapaniaceae or Cephaloziellaceae (Feldberg et al. 2009, 2013; Váňa et al. 2013; Söderström et al. 2016). In their recent study of the systematics of liverworts, Söderström et al. (2016) provisionally placed Hattoria in the family Anastrophyllaceae due to lack of molecular evidence. In the present study, we use DNA sequence data to investigate the phylogenetic position of Hattoria based on fresh samples collected in the type locality, Yakushima Island, Japan. We investigate (1) whether the genus should be placed in Adelanthaceae, Anastrophyllaceae, or Lophoziaceae, (2) whether molecular evidence supports the recognition of Hattoria as a distinct genus, and (3) which genus or species should be resolved sister to Hattoria. Materials and Methods Plant material and morphological study The molecular and morphological analyses of Hattoria yakushimensis were conducted based on fresh material with mature sporophytes collected in the type locality of the species, Yakushima Island, Japan in 2017 (Katagiri 4281 in NICH). Structural analyses were made by manual dissection of the plant material using a dissecting microscope. Molecular phylogenetic analyses Three phylogenetic markers were selected for the present analyses: chloroplast ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL), ribosomal protein S4 (rps4) genes, and the tRNA trnLUAA-trnFGAA region including the trnL intron and the trnL-trnF intergenic spacer (trnL-F). The sequences of Hattoria yakushimensis were newly obtained. The protocol for DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing, and primer sequences followed earlier publications (Taberlet et al. 1991; Souza-Chies et al. 1997; Tsubota et al. 1999, 2015; Masuzaki et al. 2010; Inoue et al. 2011, 2012; Suzuki et al. 2013; Inoue & Tsubota 2014). Sequences obtained in the present study have been submitted to the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ), a member of International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC). The newly obtained accession numbers are LC376047 for rbcL, LC376048 for rps4, and LC376049 for trnL-F. The supposed ingroup and outgroup species were selected based on De Roo et al. (2007), Yatsentyuk et al. (2004), Vilnet et al. (2010), and our preliminary analyses using Jungermanniales accessions. A total of 60 OTUs were examined in the present analysis (see Appendix). 42 Sequences of the three regions were aligned separately by using the program MAFFT ver. 7.380 (Katoh & Standley 2013) with some manual adjustment on the sequence editor of MEGA ver. 7.0.21 (Kumar et al. 2016). Start and stop codons were removed, and gaps were treated as missing data. The resulting total length was 2,634 bp. and the final data matrix consisted of 60 OTUs. Phylogenetic analysis using the concatenated sequences of rbcL, rps4 and trnL-F was performed based on a maximum likelihood (ML) method (Felsenstein 1981), and the approximate unbiased (AU) test (Shimodaira 2002, 2004) in the final stage of the analysis scheme. Prior to the phylogenetic reconstruction, Kakusan4 (ver. 4.0.2016.11.07, Tanabe 2011) was used to determine the appropriate substitution model and partitioning scheme for our data based on corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc: Sugiura 1978). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the following three program packages to obtain the candidate topologies: (1) RAxML ver. 8.2.10 (Stamatakis 2014) with ML method using the equal mean rate model among codon positions (GTR+Γ for all regions) with 1,000 heuristic searches; (2) PAUPRat (Sikes & Lewis 2001) over PAUP* ver. 4.0b10 (Swofford 2002) with the maximum parsimony (MP) method (Fitch 1971) to implement Parsimony Ratchet searches (Nixon 1999) using the Parsimony Ratchet search strategy with random weighting of each character in fifty 200 iteration runs; (3) MrBayes ver. 3.2.6 (Ronquist et al. 2012) with Bayesian inference (BI) method using the proportional model among codon positions (GTR+ Γ for all codon positions of rbcL and third codon position of rps4; K80+Γ for first and second codon positions of rps4; HKY85+Γ for trnL-F) with 10,000,000 generations, sampling trees every 1,000 generations. A 50% majority-rule consensus tree was calculated after the convergence of the chains and discarding 25% of the sampled trees as burn-in. Based on the ML criteria, re-calculation of likelihood values for each tree topology was performed by PAUP with the GTR+Γ+ Invariant model which is the best fitted model for our data. The set of candidate topologies was evaluated by the AU test and Bayesian posterior probability (PP) calculated by BIC approximation (Schwarz 1978; Hasegawa & Kishino 1989) using CONSEL ver. 0.20 (Shimodaira & Hasegawa 2001). A 50% majority-rule condensed tree for the topologies with high ranking log-likelihood values that passed both AU and PP tests was also computed by MEGA. Supporting values more than 50% obtained by CONSEL were overlaid to assess the robustness of each branch of the condensed topology: AU test (AU), bootstrap probabilities (BP), and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) are shown on or near each branch (AU/BP/PP). Results Phylogenetic analyses The concatenated data matrix had a total length of 2,634 bp, of which 1,058 (40.1%) were variable, and 733 (69.2% of the variable sites) were parsimony-informative. A total of 82 topologies were obtained from the three analyses: 13 ML topologies by RAxML; 68 MP by PAUPRat over PAUP*; and one BI by MrBayes. More detailed topologies were searched through the obtained trees using a log-likelihood measure. One 50% majority-rule condensed tree was obtained for the three topologies with high-ranking log-likelihood values that passed the both AU and PP tests as shown in Fig. 1. The resultant tree confirmed six clades 43 Figure 1. A majority-rule condensed tree based on chloroplast sequences (rbcL, rps4, trnL-F) with supporting values: AU test (AU), bootstrap probabilities (BP), and Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP). Asterisks indicate that all three supporting values are 100%. corresponding
Recommended publications
  • Additions to the Bryophyte Flora of Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh, India 1
    Additions to the Bryophyte flora of Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh, India 1 Additions to the Bryophyte flora of Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh, India 1 1 2 KRISHNA KUMAR RAWAT , VINAY SAHU , CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH , PRAVEEN 3 KUMAR VERMA 1 CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow -226001, India: [email protected], [email protected] 2AED/BPSG/EPSA, pace Applications Center, ISRO, Ahmadabad-380015, Gujarat, India: [email protected] 3Forest Research Institute, Dehradun, India: [email protected] Abstract: Rawat, K.K; Sahu, V.; Singh, C.P.; Verma, P.K. (2017): Additions to the Bryophyte flora of Tawang, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Frahmia 14:1-17. A total of 30 taxa of bryophytes are reported for the first time from Tawang district of Arunachal Pradesh, India, including 10 taxa as new to Arunachal Pradesh. 1. Introduction The district Tawang in Arunachal Pradesh, India, is located in extreme western corner of the state between 27º25’ & 27º45’N and 91º42’ & 92º39’ E covering an area of 2,172 km2 and is bordered with Tibet (China) to North, Bhutan to south-west and west Kameng district towards east. The bryo-floristic information of the area was unknown till Vohra and Kar (1996) published an account of 82 species of mosses from Arunachal Pradesh, including 12 from Tawang. Rawat and Verma (2014) published an account of 23 species of liverworts from Tawang. Recently Ellis et al (2016a, 2016b) reported two mosses viz., Splachnum sphaericum Hedw. and Polytrichastrum alpinum (Hedw.) G.L. Sm. from Tawang. The present paper provides additional information of 30 more bryophyte taxa from Tawang district of Arunachal Pradesh, making a sum of 67 bryophytes known so far from the district.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Differentiation and Structure of Boreal Populations of Crossocalyx Hellerianus (Nees Ex Lindenb.) Meyl
    Mise en garde La bibliothèque du Cégep de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue et de l’Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT) a obtenu l’autorisation de l’auteur de ce document afin de diffuser, dans un but non lucratif, une copie de son œuvre dans Depositum, site d’archives numériques, gratuit et accessible à tous. L’auteur conserve néanmoins ses droits de propriété intellectuelle, dont son droit d’auteur, sur cette œuvre. Warning The library of the Cégep de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue and the Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT) obtained the permission of the author to use a copy of this document for nonprofit purposes in order to put it in the open archives Depositum, which is free and accessible to all. The author retains ownership of the copyright on this document. UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC EN ABITIBI-TÉMISCAMINGUE DIFFÉRENCIATION GÉNÉTIQUE ET STRUCTURE DES POPULATIONS BORÉALES DE CROSSOCALYX HELLERIANUS (NEES EX LINDENB.) MEYL. EN AMÉRIQUE DU NORD MÉMOIRE PRÉSENTÉ COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE DE LA MAÎTRISE EN ÉCOLOGIE PAR NUWAN SAMEERA LIYANAGE NOVEMBRE 2020 ii UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC EN ABITIBI-TÉMISCAMINGUE GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION AND STRUCTURE OF BOREAL POPULATIONS OF CROSSOCALYX HELLERIANUS (NEES EX LINDENB.) MEYL. IN NORTH AMERICA THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MASTER'S DEGREE IN ECOLOGY BY NUWAN SAMEERA LIYANAGE NOVEMBER 2020 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Nicole Fenton, Ph.D (UQAT), for the continuous support of my study, for her patience, inspiration, enthusiasm, and expert advice. Her guidance helped me in all the stages of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of Bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus
    Journal of Bryology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjbr20 An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus N. G. Hodgetts , L. Söderström , T. L. Blockeel , S. Caspari , M. S. Ignatov , N. A. Konstantinova , N. Lockhart , B. Papp , C. Schröck , M. Sim-Sim , D. Bell , N. E. Bell , H. H. Blom , M. A. Bruggeman-Nannenga , M. Brugués , J. Enroth , K. I. Flatberg , R. Garilleti , L. Hedenäs , D. T. Holyoak , V. Hugonnot , I. Kariyawasam , H. Köckinger , J. Kučera , F. Lara & R. D. Porley To cite this article: N. G. Hodgetts , L. Söderström , T. L. Blockeel , S. Caspari , M. S. Ignatov , N. A. Konstantinova , N. Lockhart , B. Papp , C. Schröck , M. Sim-Sim , D. Bell , N. E. Bell , H. H. Blom , M. A. Bruggeman-Nannenga , M. Brugués , J. Enroth , K. I. Flatberg , R. Garilleti , L. Hedenäs , D. T. Holyoak , V. Hugonnot , I. Kariyawasam , H. Köckinger , J. Kučera , F. Lara & R. D. Porley (2020) An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus, Journal of Bryology, 42:1, 1-116, DOI: 10.1080/03736687.2019.1694329 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2019.1694329 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa Published online: 28 May 2020. UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2747 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 28 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yjbr20 JOURNAL OF BRYOLOGY 2020, VOL. 42, NO. 1, 1–116 https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2019.1694329 BRYOLOGICAL MONOGRAPH An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus N.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cape Town
    The copyright of this thesis rests with the University of Cape Town. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non-commercial research purposes only. University of Cape Town Addendum (1) Soon after submitting this thesis a more recent comprehensive classification by Crandall-Stotler et al. (2009)1 was published. This recent publication does not undermine the information presented in this thesis. The purpose of including the comprehensive classification of Crandall-Stotler and Stotler (2000) was specifically to introduce some of the issues regarding the troublesome classification of this group of plants. Crandall-Stotler and Stotler (2000), Grolle and Long (2000) for Europe and Macaronesia and Schuster (2002) for Austral Hepaticae represent three previously widely used yet differing opinions regarding Lophoziaceae classification. They thus reflect a useful account of some of the motivation for initiating this project in the first place. (2) Concurrently or soon after chapter 2 was published by de Roo et al. (2007)2 more recent relevant papers were published. These include Heinrichs et al. (2007) already referred to in chapter 4, and notably Vilnet et al. (2008)3 examining the phylogeny and systematics of the genus Lophozia s. str. The plethora of new information regarding taxa included in this thesis is encouraging and with each new publication we gain insight and a clearer understanding these fascinating little plants. University of Cape Town 1 Crandall-Stotler, B., Stotler, R.E., Long, D.G. 2009. Phylogeny and classification of the Marchantiophyta.
    [Show full text]
  • North American H&A Names
    A very tentative and preliminary list of North American liverworts and hornworts, doubtless containing errors and omissions, but forming a basis for updating the spreadsheet of recognized genera and numbers of species, November 2010. Liverworts Blasiales Blasiaceae Blasia L. Blasia pusilla L. Fossombroniales Calyculariaceae Calycularia Mitt. Calycularia crispula Mitt. Calycularia laxa Lindb. & Arnell Fossombroniaceae Fossombronia Raddi Fossombronia alaskana Steere & Inoue Fossombronia brasiliensis Steph. Fossombronia cristula Austin Fossombronia foveolata Lindb. Fossombronia hispidissima Steph. Fossombronia lamellata Steph. Fossombronia macounii Austin Fossombronia marshii J. R. Bray & Stotler Fossombronia pusilla (L.) Dumort. Fossombronia longiseta (Austin) Austin Note: Fossombronia longiseta was based on a mixture of material belonging to three different species of Fossombronia; Schuster (1992a p. 395) lectotypified F. longiseta with the specimen of Austin, Hepaticae Boreali-Americani 118 at H. An SEM of one spore from this specimen was previously published by Scott and Pike (1988 fig. 19) and it is clearly F. pusilla. It is not at all clear why Doyle and Stotler (2006) apply the name to F. hispidissima. Fossombronia texana Lindb. Fossombronia wondraczekii (Corda) Dumort. Fossombronia zygospora R.M. Schust. Petalophyllum Nees & Gottsche ex Lehm. Petalophyllum ralfsii (Wilson) Nees & Gottsche ex Lehm. Moerckiaceae Moerckia Gottsche Moerckia blyttii (Moerch) Brockm. Moerckia hibernica (Hook.) Gottsche Pallaviciniaceae Pallavicinia A. Gray, nom. cons. Pallavicinia lyellii (Hook.) Carruth. Pelliaceae Pellia Raddi, nom. cons. Pellia appalachiana R.M. Schust. (pro hybr.) Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. ssp. alpicola R.M. Schust. Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. ssp. endiviifolia Pellia epiphylla (L.) Corda Pellia megaspora R.M. Schust. Pellia neesiana (Gottsche) Limpr. Pellia neesiana (Gottsche) Limpr.
    [Show full text]
  • On Syzygiella Nipponica (Adelanthaceae
    Arctoa (2013) 22: 167-172 ON SYZYGIELLA NIPPONICA (ADELANTHACEAE, MARCHANTIOPHYTA) AND ITS FIRST RECORD IN RUSSIA О SYZYGIELLA NIPPONICA (ADELANTHACEAE, MARCHANTIOPHYTA) И ПЕРВОЙ НАХОДКЕ ЭТОГО ВИДА В РОССИИ ALEXEY D. POTEMKIN1 & YURIY S. MAMONTOV2,3 АЛЕКСЕЙ Д. ПОТЁМКИН1, ЮРИЙ С. МАМОНТОВ2,3 Abstract Syzygiella nipponica was collected in Primorye Territory on rocks. The plants were sterile and recognized due to prostrate shoots, coarsely papillose cell surface and sporadic postical intercalary branches not characteristic of known in Asia morphologically similar species of Jungermannia, Solenostoma, Plagiochila, Pedinophyllum, and Syzygiella. Collected plants are dissimilar to phyloge- netically allied Syzygiella autumnalis. Their generic position was identified in the basis of comparison of rbcL gene sequence. Joint morphological and molecular study of collected materials and morpho- logical tudy of collections from LE, KPABG, NICH, HIRO, HSNU, E (including types of Jamesoniella nipponica and its synonyms J. verrucosa, and J. perverrucosa) shows separate position of Syzygiella nipponica from S. autumnalis at the species level. Резюме Новый для России вид печёночников Syzygiella nipponica собран в Приморском крае на скалах. Растения стерильные и характеризуются стелющейся формой роста, грубопапиллозной по- верхностью клеток листьев, развитием ризоидов из брюшных оснований листьев и наличием вентрально-интеркалярного ветвления – сочетанием, которое не свойственно известным из Азии морфологически сходным видам родов Jungermannia, Solenostoma, Plagiochila, Pedinophyllum и Syzygiella. Собранные растения также не сходны с филогенетически близким видом S. autumna- lis, и их родовое положение было определено на основании сравнения нуклеотидных последо- вательностей по гену rbcL. Морфологическое и молекулярное исследование собранных мате- риалов, а также изучение морфологии образцов из LE, KPABG, NICH, HIRO, HSNU, E (включая тип вида Jamesoniella nipponica, а также типы синонимов этого вида – J.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Liverwort and Hornwort Flora of Nilgiri Hills, Western Ghats (India)
    Polish Botanical Journal 58(2): 525–537, 2013 DOI: 10.2478/pbj-2013-0038 ASSESSMENT OF LIVERWORT AND HORNWORT FLORA OF NILGIRI HILLS, WESTERN GHATS (INDIA) PR AV E E N KUMAR VERMA 1, AFROZ ALAM & K. K. RAWAT Abstract. Bryophytes are an important part of the flora of the Nilgiri Hills of Western Ghats, a biodiversity hotspot. This paper gives an updated catalogue of the Hepaticae of the Nilgiri Hills. The list includes all available records, based on the authors’ collections and those in LWU and other renowned herbaria. The catalogue of liverworts indicates their substrate and occur- rence, and includes several records new for the Nilgiri bryoflora as well as for Western Ghats. The list of Hepaticae contains 29 families, 55 genera and 164 taxa. The list of Anthocerotae comprises 2 families, 3 genera and 5 taxa belonging to almost all life form types. Key words: Western Ghats, biodiversity hotspot, Tamil Nadu, Bryophyta, Hepaticae, Anthocerotae Praveen Kumar Verma, Rain Forest Research Institute, Deovan, Sotai Ali, Post Box # 136, Jorhat – 785 001 (Assam), India; e-mail: [email protected] Afroz Alam, Department of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Banasthali University, Tonk – 304 022 (Rajasthan), India; e-mail: [email protected] K. K. Rawat, CSIR-National Botanical Research Institute, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow – 226 001, India; e-mail: drkkrawat@ rediffmail.com INTRODUCT I ON The Nilgiri Hills of Tamil Nadu are a part of the tropical hill forest, montane wet temperate forests, Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve (NBR), recognized mixed deciduous, montane evergreen (shola grass- under the Man and Biosphere (MAB) Program land) (see also Champion & Seth 1968; Hockings of UNESCO.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetic Data on Reticulate
    Phytotaxa 49: 6–22 (2012) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2012 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Molecular phylogenetic data on reticulate evolution in the genus Barbilophozia Löske (Anastrophyllaceae, Marchantiophyta) and evidence of non-concerted evolution of rDNA in Barbilophozia rubescens allopolyploid ANNA VILNET1, NADEZDA KONSTANTINOVA1 & ALEXEY TROITSKY2 1Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute of Kola SC RAS, 184236 Kirovsk-6, Russia email: [email protected], [email protected], 2 Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia email: [email protected] Abstract Phylogeny of the genus Barbilophozia inferred from ITS1-2 nrDNA, trnL-F and trnG-intron cpDNA provides different evolutionary scenarios within the genus. ITS1-2 tree placed B. barbata and B. lycopodioides in sister position, whereas from both cpDNA loci morphologically quite distinctive B. barbata is separated from B. hatcheri and B. lycopodioides. The significant differences in nucleotide sequences suggest that B. lycopodioides and B. hatcheri are clearly separated species. The poorly known species—B. rubescens—has originated through hybridization of B. barbata and B. hatcheri. The occurrence of both two parental types of ITS in hybrid accessions indicate a non-completeness of concerted evolution in these cases. The highest haplotype diversity is found for ITS1-2 that could be caused by recombination, whereas trnL-F and trnG are characterized only by several haplotypes. The haplotypes distribution is weakly supported from geographical evidence. Key words: liverworts, Jungermanniales, speciation, hybridization, systematics, molecular evolution, biogeography, ITS1-2, trnL-F, trnG-intron Introduction Barbilophozia is a widely distributed and morphologically relatively easily distinguishable group of jungermannioid liverworts.
    [Show full text]
  • Article ISSN 1179-3163 (Online Edition)
    Phytotaxa 63: 21–68 (2012) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2012 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Early Land Plants Today: Index of Liverworts & Hornworts 2009–2010 LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, ANDERS HAGBORG2, MARSHALL R. CROSBY3 & MATT VON KONRAT2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] 2 Department of Botany, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605–2496, U.S.A.;[email protected], [email protected] 3 Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166–0299 U.S.A.; [email protected] Abstract A widely accessible list of known plant species is a fundamental requirement for plant conservation and has vast applications. An index of published names of liverworts and hornworts between 2009 and 2010 is provided as part of a continued effort in working toward producing a world checklist of this group. Included in the list are also names overlooked by earlier indices. The list includes 30 higher taxa, 250 species, 52 infraspecific taxa, 31 autonyms, and two fossils for 2009 and 2010. A number of taxa not covered by the earlier indices for 2000-2008 are also included. Key words: Liverworts, hornworts, index, nomenclature Introduction Under the auspices of the Early Land Plants Today project, there has been a strong community-driven effort attempting to address the critical need to synthesize the vast nomenclatural, taxonomic and global distributional data for liverworts (Marchantiophyta) and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) (von Konrat et al. 2010a). These endeavours are critical in providing the foundation to develop a working checklist of liverworts and hornworts worldwide; the first version is projected to be published in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Ecology Table of Contents
    Glime, J. M. 2020. Table of Contents. Bryophyte Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University 1 and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 15 July 2020 and available at <https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. This file will contain all the volumes, chapters, and headings within chapters to help you find what you want in the book. Once you enter a chapter, there will be a table of contents with clickable page numbers. To search the list, check the upper screen of your pdf reader for a search window or magnifying glass. If there is none, try Ctrl G to open one. TABLE OF CONTENTS BRYOPHYTE ECOLOGY VOLUME 1: PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY Chapter in Volume 1 1 INTRODUCTION Thinking on a New Scale Adaptations to Land Minimum Size Do Bryophytes Lack Diversity? The "Moss" What's in a Name? Phyla/Divisions Role of Bryology 2 LIFE CYCLES AND MORPHOLOGY 2-1: Meet the Bryophytes Definition of Bryophyte Nomenclature What Makes Bryophytes Unique Who are the Relatives? Two Branches Limitations of Scale Limited by Scale – and No Lignin Limited by Scale – Forced to Be Simple Limited by Scale – Needing to Swim Limited by Scale – and Housing an Embryo Higher Classifications and New Meanings New Meanings for the Term Bryophyte Differences within Bryobiotina 2-2: Life Cycles: Surviving Change The General Bryobiotina Life Cycle Dominant Generation The Life Cycle Life Cycle Controls Generation Time Importance Longevity and Totipotency 2-3: Marchantiophyta Distinguishing Marchantiophyta Elaters Leafy or Thallose? Class
    [Show full text]
  • Phytotaxa, Taxonomic Novelties Resulting from Recent Reclassification of the Lophoziaceae
    Phytotaxa 3: 47–53 (2010) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Article PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2010 • Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Taxonomic novelties resulting from recent reclassification of the Lophoziaceae/ Scapaniaceae clade LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, RYAN DE ROO2 & TERRY HEDDERSON2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway email: [email protected] 2 Bolus Herbarium, Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa email: [email protected] Abstract A new family, Anastrophyllaceae, is segregated from Lophoziaceae, two new genera, Neoorthocaulis and Oleolophozia are described and the following new combinations are made: Neoorthocaulis attenuatus, N. binsteadii, N. floerkei, N. hyperboreus, Barbilophozia subgen. Sudeticae, Barbilophozia sudetica and Oleolophozia perssonii. Key words: Anastrophyllaceae, liverworts, Neoorthocaulis, Oleolophozia, Barbilophozia Introduction The Lophoziaceae has previously been either recognized as a separate family (e.g. Grolle & Long 2000) or placed in the synonymy of Jungermanniaceae (e.g. Damsholt 2002). Recent molecular work (De Roo et al. 2007) has shown that the two are not particularly closely related and that Lophoziaceae should be retained as a separate family. However, molecular data (Schill et al. 2004) also show that the family Scapaniaceae is nested within Lophoziaceae, a pattern confirmed by, inter alia, Yatsentyuk et al. (2004), Davis (2004) and De Roo et al. (2007). Those studies also exclude two elements frequently included in Lophoziaceae in the past— the family Jamesoniellaceae and the genus Leiocolea (Müller 1913: 711) Buch (1933: 288). However, some recent studies (De Roo et al. 2007 and unpublished results by R.
    [Show full text]