DOCSLIB.ORG

An Annotated Checklist of Bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Annotated Checklist of Bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus Journal of Bryology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/yjbr20 An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus N. G. Hodgetts , L. Söderström , T. L. Blockeel , S. Caspari , M. S. Ignatov , N. A. Konstantinova , N. Lockhart , B. Papp , C. Schröck , M. Sim-Sim , D. Bell , N. E. Bell , H. H. Blom , M. A. Bruggeman-Nannenga , M. Brugués , J. Enroth , K. I. Flatberg , R. Garilleti , L. Hedenäs , D. T. Holyoak , V. Hugonnot , I. Kariyawasam , H. Köckinger , J. Kučera , F. Lara & R. D. Porley To cite this article: N. G. Hodgetts , L. Söderström , T. L. Blockeel , S. Caspari , M. S. Ignatov , N. A. Konstantinova , N. Lockhart , B. Papp , C. Schröck , M. Sim-Sim , D. Bell , N. E. Bell , H. H. Blom , M. A. Bruggeman-Nannenga , M. Brugués , J. Enroth , K. I. Flatberg , R. Garilleti , L. Hedenäs , D. T. Holyoak , V. Hugonnot , I. Kariyawasam , H. Köckinger , J. Kučera , F. Lara & R. D. Porley (2020) An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus, Journal of Bryology, 42:1, 1-116, DOI: 10.1080/03736687.2019.1694329 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2019.1694329 © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa Published online: 28 May 2020. UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group Submit your article to this journal Article views: 2747 View related articles View Crossmark data Citing articles: 28 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=yjbr20 JOURNAL OF BRYOLOGY 2020, VOL. 42, NO. 1, 1–116 https://doi.org/10.1080/03736687.2019.1694329 BRYOLOGICAL MONOGRAPH An annotated checklist of bryophytes of Europe, Macaronesia and Cyprus N. G. Hodgettsa, L. Söderström b, T. L. Blockeelc, S. Casparid, M. S. Ignatove, N. A. Konstantinovaf, N. Lockhartg, B. Papph, C. Schröcki, M. Sim-Simj, D. Bellk, N. E. Bell k, H. H. Bloml, M. A. Bruggeman- Nannengam, M. Bruguésn, J. Enrotho, K. I. Flatbergp, R. Garilleti q, L. Hedenäs r, D. T. Holyoaks, V. Hugonnott, I. Kariyawasamk, H. Köckingeru, J. Kučera v, F. Lara w and R. D. Porleyx aCuillin Views, Isle of Skye, UK; bNorwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; cDore, Sheffield, UK; dZentrum für Biodokumentation, Schiffweiler, Saarland, Germany; eMoscow University and Tsitsin Main Botanica Garden RAS, Moscow, Russia; fPolar- Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute RAS, Kirovsk, Russia; gNational Parks and Wildlife Service, Dublin, Ireland; hHungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Hungary; iBiology Centre of Upper Austrian National Museums, Linz, Austria; jUniversidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, cE3c - Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes, Lisboa, Portugal; kRoyal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, UK; lNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Bergen, Norway; mGriffensteijnseplein 23, Zeist, The Netherlands; nFacultat de Biosciènces, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain; oOrganismal and Evolutionary Research Programme, University of Helsinki, Finland; pDepartment of Natural History, University Museum, Trondheim, Norway; qDepartamento de Botánica y Geología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Valencia, Spain; rSwedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden; sRua da Barcoila 274, Cabeçudo, Portugal; tConservatoire Botanique National du Massif Central, Chavaniac Lafayette, France; uRoseggergasse 12, Weisskirchen, Austria; vFaculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic; wCentro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC-UAM), Madrid, Spain; xCerca dos Pomares, Aljezur, Portugal ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Introduction. Following on from work on the European bryophyte Red List, the First Published Online taxonomically and nomenclaturally updated spreadsheets used for that project have been 12 May 2020 expanded into a new checklist for the bryophytes of Europe. KEYWORDS Methods. A steering group of ten European bryologists was convened, and over the course Bryophytes; mosses; of a year, the spreadsheets were compared with previous European checklists, and all liverworts; hornworts; changes noted. Recent literature was searched extensively. A taxonomic system was Europe; checklist agreed, and the advice and expertise of many European bryologists sought. Key results. A new European checklist of bryophytes, comprising hornworts, liverworts and mosses, is presented. Fifteen new combinations are proposed. Conclusions. This checklist provides a snapshot of the current European bryophyte flora in 2019. It will already be out-of-date on publication, and further research, particularly molecular work, can be expected to result in many more changes over the next few years. Introduction The last published annotated checklist for mosses in of the great amount of new molecular work that Europe was Hill et al. (2006), while for liverworts and has been done (and continues to be done) on bryo- hornworts it was Grolle and Long (2000), although a phytes, revealing many new and often unexpected checklist with distributional records was produced by relationships. The nomenclature of liverworts and Söderström, Urmi, et al. (2002) and updated by hornworts in particular has undergone radical Söderström, Urmi, et al. (2007). In addition, Séneca changes, as recorded in the recent World Checklist and Söderström (2009) published a checklist of the (Söderström, Hagborg, et al. 2016), which, however, Sphagnophyta of Europe and Macaronesia with dis- did not contain synonyms. tribution data. During work for the new European Ironically, the checklist by Hill et al. (2006) was pre- bryophyte Red List, it became apparent that not pared in response to the intention of the European only was it necessary to publish a new European Committee for the Conservation of Bryophytes (ECCB) checklist covering all the bryophytes, but also that to produce a new Red List, but the latter had to wait this would be relatively little extra work, because another ten years before being addressed properly, spreadsheets of species indicating their distribution when the ECCB entered into collaboration with the by country had been prepared for the Red List, and International Union for the Conservation of Nature every effortmadetoupdatethenomenclatureand (IUCN), at which point LIFE funding became available taxonomy. A new checklist is also needed because for the Red List project. The Red List has now been CONTACT N. G. Hodgetts [email protected] This article was originally published with a minor error, which has now been corrected in the online version. Please see Correction (https://doi.org/10.1080/ 03736687.2020.1812875I). © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. Published online 28 May 2020 2 N. G. HODGETTS ET AL. published (Hodgetts et al. 2019), and the names are the World Checklist (Söderström, Hagborg, et al. substantially the same as in this checklist, although 2016). The provisional spreadsheets were also sent there have been some updates and additions to the to other bryologists for further expert advice checklist since the Red List cut-off date of 31 December (authors DB, VH and HK and those listed in acknowl- 2018, and the geographical areas covered by the Red edgements below). List and the checklist differ slightly (see below). Taxonomic hierarchy Methods For the liverworts and hornworts, the taxonomic hier- Following work on the Red List, funding was secured archy follows the Catalogue of Life (Roskov et al. ’ from the Irish government’s National Parks and Wildlife 2019),theonlinedatabaseoftheworldsknown Service to enable author NGH to co-ordinate a new species of animals, plants, fungi and micro-organ- checklist project. A Steering Group was set isms, in which the hierarchy for the hornworts up consisting of Tom Blockeel, Steffen Caspari, Nick (Anthocerotophyta) and the liverworts (Marchantio- Hodgetts, Misha Ignatov, Nadya Konstantinova, Neil phyta) is contributed by the Early Land Plants Lockhart, Beata Papp, Christian Schröck, Manuela Sim- Today project (Söderström, Hagborg, et al. 2019). fi Sim and Lars Söderström. Communication has largely The higher classi cation is substantially the same as been through e-mail, but the Steering Group met the one presented in the bryophyte phylogeny once in Budapest, in November 2018, to coincide poster by Cole et al. (2019). with the final Red List meeting. After this meeting, It was more complicated to agree on a higher fi NGH led on the moss part of the checklist and author classi cation of mosses, as current concepts are in fl LS led on the liverworts and hornworts. a considerable state of ux as more molecular The existing network of ECCB contacts was crucial to work is done. Pleurocarpous mosses in particular the project, and a large number of bryologists in have undergone many changes in recent years, Europe have contributed, and those making major con- and it is expected that this will continue before rela- tributions are included in the authorship. tive stability is achieved. Our starting point was Frey The first step was to compare the data in the Red List and Stech
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Genetic Differentiation and Structure of Boreal Populations of Crossocalyx Hellerianus (Nees Ex Lindenb.) Meyl
    Mise en garde La bibliothèque du Cégep de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue et de l’Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT) a obtenu l’autorisation de l’auteur de ce document afin de diffuser, dans un but non lucratif, une copie de son œuvre dans Depositum, site d’archives numériques, gratuit et accessible à tous. L’auteur conserve néanmoins ses droits de propriété intellectuelle, dont son droit d’auteur, sur cette œuvre. Warning The library of the Cégep de l’Abitibi-Témiscamingue and the Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT) obtained the permission of the author to use a copy of this document for nonprofit purposes in order to put it in the open archives Depositum, which is free and accessible to all. The author retains ownership of the copyright on this document. UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC EN ABITIBI-TÉMISCAMINGUE DIFFÉRENCIATION GÉNÉTIQUE ET STRUCTURE DES POPULATIONS BORÉALES DE CROSSOCALYX HELLERIANUS (NEES EX LINDENB.) MEYL. EN AMÉRIQUE DU NORD MÉMOIRE PRÉSENTÉ COMME EXIGENCE PARTIELLE DE LA MAÎTRISE EN ÉCOLOGIE PAR NUWAN SAMEERA LIYANAGE NOVEMBRE 2020 ii UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC EN ABITIBI-TÉMISCAMINGUE GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION AND STRUCTURE OF BOREAL POPULATIONS OF CROSSOCALYX HELLERIANUS (NEES EX LINDENB.) MEYL. IN NORTH AMERICA THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MASTER'S DEGREE IN ECOLOGY BY NUWAN SAMEERA LIYANAGE NOVEMBER 2020 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor Nicole Fenton, Ph.D (UQAT), for the continuous support of my study, for her patience, inspiration, enthusiasm, and expert advice. Her guidance helped me in all the stages of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Cape Town
    The copyright of this thesis rests with the University of Cape Town. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non-commercial research purposes only. University of Cape Town Addendum (1) Soon after submitting this thesis a more recent comprehensive classification by Crandall-Stotler et al. (2009)1 was published. This recent publication does not undermine the information presented in this thesis. The purpose of including the comprehensive classification of Crandall-Stotler and Stotler (2000) was specifically to introduce some of the issues regarding the troublesome classification of this group of plants. Crandall-Stotler and Stotler (2000), Grolle and Long (2000) for Europe and Macaronesia and Schuster (2002) for Austral Hepaticae represent three previously widely used yet differing opinions regarding Lophoziaceae classification. They thus reflect a useful account of some of the motivation for initiating this project in the first place. (2) Concurrently or soon after chapter 2 was published by de Roo et al. (2007)2 more recent relevant papers were published. These include Heinrichs et al. (2007) already referred to in chapter 4, and notably Vilnet et al. (2008)3 examining the phylogeny and systematics of the genus Lophozia s. str. The plethora of new information regarding taxa included in this thesis is encouraging and with each new publication we gain insight and a clearer understanding these fascinating little plants. University of Cape Town 1 Crandall-Stotler, B., Stotler, R.E., Long, D.G. 2009. Phylogeny and classification of the Marchantiophyta.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes of Lophozia. Vii. on the Distribution of Some Species of Lophozia in Georgia (Caucasus) Заметки По Роду Lophozia
    Arctoa (2013) 22: 121-123 NOTES OF LOPHOZIA. VII. ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF SOME SPECIES OF LOPHOZIA IN GEORGIA (CAUCASUS) ЗАМЕТКИ ПО РОДУ LOPHOZIA. VII. О РАСПРОСТРАНЕНИИ НЕКОТОРЫХ ВИДОВ LOPHOZIA В ГРУЗИИ (КАВКАЗ) VADIM A. BAKALIN1, 2 & KETEVAN TIGISHVILI3 ВАДИМ А. БАКАЛИН1, 2, КЕТЕВАН ТИГИШВИЛИ3 Abstract Revision of the liverwort collection in Tbilisi Institute of Botany (TBI) has revealed four Lophozia taxa new for the liverwort flora of Georgia : L. lantratoviae Bakalin, L. longidens (Lindb.) Macoun, L. perssonii H. Buch et S.W. Arnell and L. wenzelii (Nees) Steph. var. massularioides Bakalin. A com- ment on these new findings is supplemented by the list of all Lophozia specimens in TBI. Резюме При ревизии коллекции печеночников, хранящейся в Тбилисском институте ботаники (TBI), обнаружено 4 новых для Грузии таксона Lophozia: L. lantratoviae Bakalin, L. longidens (Lindb.) Macoun, L. perssonii H. Buch et S.W. Arnell и L. wenzelii (Nees) Steph. var. massularioides Bakalin. Приводится описание этих новых находок и список всех видов Lophozia с территории Грузии, образцы которых хранятся в TBI. KEYWORDS: Lophozia, liverworts, Hepaticae, Georgia, Caucasus. The last checklist of Georgian bryophytes was pub- ca (Nees ex Hueb.) Konstant. et Vilnet (= Lophozia su- lished at 2004 (Chikovani & Svanidze, 2004). It includes detica)) (Konstantinova & Vilnet, 2009). These “super- data on distribution of 174 taxa of hepatics (3 hornworts splitted” genera, however, are not distinct in morpholo- and 171 liverworts) within administrative subunits and gy, so we retain Lophozia in the sense of Schljakov’s represents a shortened version of conspectus published (1980) Lophozia or Lophozia subg. Lophozia sensu 18 years before (Chikovani, 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • North American H&A Names
    A very tentative and preliminary list of North American liverworts and hornworts, doubtless containing errors and omissions, but forming a basis for updating the spreadsheet of recognized genera and numbers of species, November 2010. Liverworts Blasiales Blasiaceae Blasia L. Blasia pusilla L. Fossombroniales Calyculariaceae Calycularia Mitt. Calycularia crispula Mitt. Calycularia laxa Lindb. & Arnell Fossombroniaceae Fossombronia Raddi Fossombronia alaskana Steere & Inoue Fossombronia brasiliensis Steph. Fossombronia cristula Austin Fossombronia foveolata Lindb. Fossombronia hispidissima Steph. Fossombronia lamellata Steph. Fossombronia macounii Austin Fossombronia marshii J. R. Bray & Stotler Fossombronia pusilla (L.) Dumort. Fossombronia longiseta (Austin) Austin Note: Fossombronia longiseta was based on a mixture of material belonging to three different species of Fossombronia; Schuster (1992a p. 395) lectotypified F. longiseta with the specimen of Austin, Hepaticae Boreali-Americani 118 at H. An SEM of one spore from this specimen was previously published by Scott and Pike (1988 fig. 19) and it is clearly F. pusilla. It is not at all clear why Doyle and Stotler (2006) apply the name to F. hispidissima. Fossombronia texana Lindb. Fossombronia wondraczekii (Corda) Dumort. Fossombronia zygospora R.M. Schust. Petalophyllum Nees & Gottsche ex Lehm. Petalophyllum ralfsii (Wilson) Nees & Gottsche ex Lehm. Moerckiaceae Moerckia Gottsche Moerckia blyttii (Moerch) Brockm. Moerckia hibernica (Hook.) Gottsche Pallaviciniaceae Pallavicinia A. Gray, nom. cons. Pallavicinia lyellii (Hook.) Carruth. Pelliaceae Pellia Raddi, nom. cons. Pellia appalachiana R.M. Schust. (pro hybr.) Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. ssp. alpicola R.M. Schust. Pellia endiviifolia (Dicks.) Dumort. ssp. endiviifolia Pellia epiphylla (L.) Corda Pellia megaspora R.M. Schust. Pellia neesiana (Gottsche) Limpr. Pellia neesiana (Gottsche) Limpr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of Estonian Bryophytes
    Folia Cryptog. Estonica, Fasc. 52: 109–127 (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.12697/fce.2015.52.14 Annotated checklist of Estonian bryophytes Kai Vellak1,2, Nele Ingerpuu2, Mare Leis3 & Loore Ehrlich4 1Natural History Museum, University of Tartu, 46 Vanemuise Street, Tartu 51014. E-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Street, Tartu 51005. E-mail: [email protected] 3Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 5 Fr. R. Kreutzwald Street, 51014 Tartu. E-mail: [email protected] 4Estonian Museum of Natural History, 26 Toompuiestee Street, 10148 Tallinn. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The updated list of Estonian bryophytes includes 594 species from all three phyla. Only one species is reported for Estonia according to the literature data, all others have voucher speciemens in herbaria, two of them outside of Estonia. Altogether 242 species are frequent in Estonia, 173 species are rare, and 161 are sporadically distributed. We do not have any recent data for 20 species, and their presence in Estonia is doubtful. In 2008 a new Estonian Red list was compiled and 369 bryophyte species were evaluated against IUCN criteria. Approximately one fifth of the Estonian bryoflora (129 species) is designated to the three threat categories. Keywords: Bryoflora, frequencies of species, protected species, red list INTRODUCTION The diversity of taxa at the global or local scale taxa according to recently accepted synonyms, depends greatly on the taxonomical research. supply every taxa with a voucher specimen, The species number of bryophytes in the world estimate the present frequency in Estonia and varies between 15 000 and 20 000 (Shaw et al., give proper names in Estonian for new taxa or 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Article ISSN 1179-3163 (Online Edition)
    Phytotaxa 63: 21–68 (2012) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2012 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Early Land Plants Today: Index of Liverworts & Hornworts 2009–2010 LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, ANDERS HAGBORG2, MARSHALL R. CROSBY3 & MATT VON KONRAT2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491, Trondheim, Norway; [email protected] 2 Department of Botany, The Field Museum, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, IL 60605–2496, U.S.A.;[email protected], [email protected] 3 Missouri Botanical Garden, P. O. Box 299, St. Louis, MO 63166–0299 U.S.A.; [email protected] Abstract A widely accessible list of known plant species is a fundamental requirement for plant conservation and has vast applications. An index of published names of liverworts and hornworts between 2009 and 2010 is provided as part of a continued effort in working toward producing a world checklist of this group. Included in the list are also names overlooked by earlier indices. The list includes 30 higher taxa, 250 species, 52 infraspecific taxa, 31 autonyms, and two fossils for 2009 and 2010. A number of taxa not covered by the earlier indices for 2000-2008 are also included. Key words: Liverworts, hornworts, index, nomenclature Introduction Under the auspices of the Early Land Plants Today project, there has been a strong community-driven effort attempting to address the critical need to synthesize the vast nomenclatural, taxonomic and global distributional data for liverworts (Marchantiophyta) and hornworts (Anthocerotophyta) (von Konrat et al. 2010a). These endeavours are critical in providing the foundation to develop a working checklist of liverworts and hornworts worldwide; the first version is projected to be published in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytotaxa, Taxonomic Novelties Resulting from Recent Reclassification of the Lophoziaceae
    Phytotaxa 3: 47–53 (2010) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Article PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2010 • Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) Taxonomic novelties resulting from recent reclassification of the Lophoziaceae/ Scapaniaceae clade LARS SÖDERSTRÖM1, RYAN DE ROO2 & TERRY HEDDERSON2 1 Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway email: [email protected] 2 Bolus Herbarium, Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, Private Bag, Rondebosch 7701, South Africa email: [email protected] Abstract A new family, Anastrophyllaceae, is segregated from Lophoziaceae, two new genera, Neoorthocaulis and Oleolophozia are described and the following new combinations are made: Neoorthocaulis attenuatus, N. binsteadii, N. floerkei, N. hyperboreus, Barbilophozia subgen. Sudeticae, Barbilophozia sudetica and Oleolophozia perssonii. Key words: Anastrophyllaceae, liverworts, Neoorthocaulis, Oleolophozia, Barbilophozia Introduction The Lophoziaceae has previously been either recognized as a separate family (e.g. Grolle & Long 2000) or placed in the synonymy of Jungermanniaceae (e.g. Damsholt 2002). Recent molecular work (De Roo et al. 2007) has shown that the two are not particularly closely related and that Lophoziaceae should be retained as a separate family. However, molecular data (Schill et al. 2004) also show that the family Scapaniaceae is nested within Lophoziaceae, a pattern confirmed by, inter alia, Yatsentyuk et al. (2004), Davis (2004) and De Roo et al. (2007). Those studies also exclude two elements frequently included in Lophoziaceae in the past— the family Jamesoniellaceae and the genus Leiocolea (Müller 1913: 711) Buch (1933: 288). However, some recent studies (De Roo et al. 2007 and unpublished results by R.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikstrom2009chap13.Pdf
    Liverworts (Marchantiophyta) Niklas Wikströma,*, Xiaolan He-Nygrénb, and our understanding of phylogenetic relationships among A. Jonathan Shawc major lineages and the origin and divergence times of aDepartment of Systematic Botany, Evolutionary Biology Centre, those lineages. Norbyvägen 18D, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D 75236, Altogether, liverworts (Phylum Marchantiophyta) b Uppsala, Sweden; Botanical Museum, Finnish Museum of Natural comprise an estimated 5000–8000 living species (8, 9). History, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 7, 00014 Helsinki, Finland; Early and alternative classiA cations for these taxa have cDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA *To whom correspondence should be addressed (niklas.wikstrom@ been numerous [reviewed by Schuster ( 10)], but the ebc.uu.se) arrangement of terminal taxa (species, genera) into lar- ger groups (e.g., families and orders) based on morpho- logical criteria alone began in the 1960s and 1970s with Abstract the work of Schuster (8, 10, 11) and Schljakov (12, 13), and culminated by the turn of the millenium with the work Liverworts (Phylum Marchantiophyta) include 5000–8000 of Crandall-Stotler and Stotler (14). 7 ree morphological species. Phylogenetic analyses divide liverworts into types of plant bodies (gametophytes) have generally been Haplomitriopsida, Marchantiopsida, and Jungerman- recognized and used in liverwort classiA cations: “com- niopsida. Complex thalloids are grouped with Blasiales in plex thalloids” including ~6% of extant species diversity Marchantiopsida, and leafy liverworts are grouped with and with a thalloid gametophyte that is organized into Metzgeriidae and Pelliidae in Jungermanniopsida. The distinct layers; “leafy liverworts”, by far the most speci- timetree shows an early Devonian (408 million years ago, ose group, including ~86% of extant species diversity and Ma) origin for extant liverworts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cephaloziella Konstantinovae (Cephaloziellaceae, Marchantiophyta), a New Leafy Liverwort Species from Russia and Mongolia Identified by Integrative Taxonomy
    Polish Botanical Journal 62(1): 1–19, 2017 e-ISSN 2084-4352 DOI: 10.1515/pbj-2017-0001 ISSN 1641-8190 CEPHALOZIELLA KONSTANTINOVAE (CEPHALOZIELLACEAE, MARCHANTIOPHYTA), A NEW LEAFY LIVERWORT SPECIES FROM RUSSIA AND MONGOLIA IDENTIFIED BY INTEGRATIVE TAXONOMY 1 Yuriy S. Mamontov & Anna A. Vilnet Abstract. In the course of a taxonomic study of the genus Cephaloziella (Spruce) Schiffn. (Cephaloziellaceae, Marchantiophyta) in Asia, the new species Cephaloziella konstantinovae Mamontov & Vilnet, sp. nov., from the eastern regions of Russia and from the Republic of Mongolia was discovered. The new species is formally described and illustrated here. Morphologically it is similar to C. divaricata var. asperifolia (Taylor) Damsh., but differs in its leaf shape and thin-walled, inflated stem and leaf cells. The new species can be distinguished from other Cephaloziella taxa by the following characters: (i) female bracts entirely free from each other and from bracteole, (ii) perianth campanulate, (iii) cells of perianth mouth subquadrate, (iv) capsule spherical, (v) seta with 8–10 + 4–6-seriate morphology, and (vi) elaters with 1–2 spiral bands. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of nrITS1-5.8S-ITS2 and chloroplast trnL-F sequences from 63 samples (34 species, 23 genera) confirm the taxonomical status of the new species. Five specimens of C. konstantinovae form a clade placed sister to a clade of C. elachista (J. B. Jack) Schiffn. and C. rubella (Nees) Warnst. Key words: Cephaloziella konstantinovae, distribution, ecology, new species, Hepaticae, taxonomy, ITS1-2 nrDNA, trnL-F cpDNA Yuriy S. Mamontov, Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institute, Kola Scientific Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, 184256, Kirovsk, Russia; Komarov Botanical Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2 Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Flora of the Czech Republic: Updated Checklist and Red List and a Brief Analysis
    Preslia 84: 813–850, 2012 813 Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis Bryoflóra České republiky: aktualizace seznamu a červeného seznamu a stručná analýza Dedicated to the centenary of the Czech Botanical Society (1912–2012) Jan K u č e r a1, Jiří Vá ň a2 & Zbyněk H r a d í l e k3 1University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branišovská 31, CZ–370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 2Charles University Prague, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Benátská 2, CZ–128 01 Prague 2, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]; 3Palacký University Olomouc, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Šlechtitelů 11, CZ-783 71 Olomouc-Holice, Czech Republic, e-mail: [email protected]. Kučera J., Váňa J. & Hradílek Z. (2012): Bryophyte flora of the Czech Republic: updated checklist and Red List and a brief analysis. – Preslia 84: 813–850. The bryoflora of the Czech Republic is analysed using an updated version of the checklist that includes recent taxonomic and nomenclatural changes. In addition, the baseline data was com- pletely revised using the IUCN 3.1 criteria. The main list includes 863 species of bryophytes (4 hornworts, 207 liverworts and 652 mosses) with 5 additional subspecies and 23 generally recog- nized varieties; 9 additional species are listed as of doubtful taxonomic status and 17 other species are evaluated as of uncertain occurrence. Of the 892 taxa evaluated, 46% qualified for inclusion in Red List categories (40 taxa in category RE, 70 in CR, 88 in EN, 93 in VU, 66 in LR-nt, 24 in DD-va and 30 in DD), while 54% are considered Least Concern (LC).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of New Zealand Hornworts and Liverworts, 2014
    NEW ZEALAND THREAT CLASSIFICATION SERIES 11 Conservation status of New Zealand hornworts and liverworts, 2014 Peter J. de Lange, David Glenny, John Braggins, Matt Renner, Matt von Konrat, John Engel, Catherine Reeb and Jeremy Rolfe Cover: Chaetophyllopsis whiteleggei, Nationally Endangered, growing under alpine tangle fern (Gleichenia alpina) on the southern slopes of Mount Ruapehu. Note that the image shows the plant at many times its actual size. Photo: Jeremy Rolfe New Zealand Threat Classification Series is a scientific monograph series presenting publications related to the New Zealand Threat Classification System (NZTCS). Most will be lists providing NZTCS status of members of a plant or animal group (e.g. algae, birds, spiders). There are currently 23 groups, each assessed once every 5 years. After each five-year cycle there will be a report analysing and summarising trends across all groups for that listing cycle. From time to time the manual that defines the categories, criteria and process for the NZTCS will be reviewed. Publications in this series are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. This report is available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science & technical. © Copyright September 2015, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 2324–1713 (web PDF) ISBN 978–0–478–15051–3 (web PDF) This report was prepared for publication by the Publishing Team; editing and layout by Lynette Clelland. Publication was approved by the Deputy Director-General, Science and Policy, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. Published by Publishing Team, Department of Conservation, PO Box 10420, The Terrace, Wellington 6143, New Zealand.
    [Show full text]